Long‐Term Outcome Following Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Originating From the Pulmonary Veins: Absence of Late Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation and Pulmonary Vein Tachycardia . Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the long‐term outcome and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients following catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia (AT) from the pulmonary veins (PV). Background: Although both AT and AF may originate from ectopic foci within PVs, it is unknown whether PV AT patients subsequently develop AF. Methods: Twenty‐eight patients with 29 PV ATs (14%) from a consecutive series of 194 patients who underwent RFA for focal AT were included. Patients with concomitant AF prior to the index procedure were excluded. Results: The minimum follow‐up duration was 4 years; mean age 38 ± 18 years with symptoms for 6.5 ± 10 years, having tried 1.5 ± 0.9 antiarrhythmic drugs. The distribution of foci was: left superior 12 (41%), right superior 10 (34%), left inferior 5 (17%), and right inferior 2 (7%). The focus was ostial in 93% and 2–4 cm distally within the vein in 7%. Mean tachycardia cycle length was 364 ± 90 ms. Focal ablation was performed in 25 of 28 patients. There were 6 recurrences with 5 from the original site. Twenty‐six patients were available for long‐term clinical follow‐up. At a mean of 7.2 ± 2.1 years, 25 of 26 (96%) were free from recurrence off antiarrhythmic drugs. No patients developed AF. Conclusions: Focal ablation for tachycardia originating from the PVs is associated with long‐term freedom from both AT and AF. Therefore, although PV AT and PV AF share a common anatomic distribution, PV AT is a distinct clinical entity successfully treated with focal RFA and not associated with AF in the long term. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 747‐750, July 2010)     

Pulmonary Vein Contraction Before and After Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary Vein Contraction After Ablation. Introduction: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) may provide a noninvasive method to test for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) by detecting changes in PV contraction. Methods: PV contraction (the maximal percentage change in PV cross‐sectional area [CSA] during the cardiac cycle) measured 1 month before and 2 months after PV isolation was compared in 63 PVs from 16 patients with medically refractory AF. Repeat cMRI imaging and invasive catheter mapping was performed prior to repeat PV ablation in 50 PVs from 14 additional patients with recurrent AF. Contraction in PVs with sustained isolation after the initial ablation was compared to contraction in PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff PV contraction value for prediction of PV‐atrial reconnection after ablation. The cutoff value was then prospectively tested in 40 PVs from 12 additional patients. Results: PV contraction decreased after AF ablation (22.4 ± 10% variation in CSA before ablation vs 10.1 ± 8% variation in CSA after ablation, P < 0.00001). PVs with sustained isolation on invasive mapping contracted less than PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium (13.7 ± 10.6% vs 21.4 ± 9.3%, P = 0.021). PV contraction produced a c‐index of 0.74 for prediction of PV‐atrial reconnection after ablation and >17% variation in PV CSA predicted reconnection with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 66.7%. Conclusion: PV contraction is reduced by ablation. PV contraction measurement may provide a noninvasive method to test for PV isolation after ablation procedures. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 169‐174, February 2011)     

The impact of age on ablation outcomes in AF-mediated cardiomyopathy

Introduction

The absence of ventricular scar in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and systolic heart failure (HF) predicts left ventricular (LV) recovery following AF ablation. It is unknown whether age impacts the degree of LV recovery, reverse remodeling, or AF recurrence following catheter ablation (CA) among this population.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of age on LV recovery and AF recurrence in a population with AF and systolic HF without fibrosis (termed AF-mediated cardiomyopathy) following CA.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing CA between 2013 and 2021 with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45% and absence of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) detected LV myocardial fibrosis were stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 years). Following CA, participants underwent remote rhythm monitoring for 12 months with repeat CMR for HF surveillance.

Results

The study population consisted of 70 patients (10% female, mean LVEF 33 ± 9%), stratified into younger (age < 65 years, 63%) and older (age ≥ 65 years, 37%) cohorts. Baseline comorbidities, LVEF (34 ± 9 vs. 33 ± 8 ≥65 years, p = .686), atrial and ventricular dimensions (left atrial volume index: 55 ± 21 vs. 56 ± 14 mL/m² age ≥ 65, p = .834; indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume: 108 ± 40 vs. 104 ± 28 mL/m² age ≥ 65, p = .681), pharmacotherapy and ablation strategy (pulmonary vein isolation in all; posterior wall isolation in 27% vs. 19% age ≥ 65, p = .448; cavotricuspid isthmus in 9% vs. 11.5% age ≥ 65) were comparable (all p > .05) albeit a higher CHADS₂VASc score in the older cohort (2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.6 age < 65, p < .001).   Freedom from AF was comparable (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.38–1.48, LogRank p = .283) as was AF burden [0% (interquartile range, IQR: 0.0–2.1) vs. age ≥ 65: [0% (IQR 0.0–1.7), p = .516], irrespective of age. There was a significant improvement in LV systolic function in both groups (ΔLVEF + 21 ± 14% vs. +21 ± 12% age ≥ 65, p = .913), with LV recovery in the vast majority (73% vs. 69%, respectively, p = .759) at 13 (IQR: 12–16) months. This was accompanied by comparable improvements in functional status (New York Heart Association class p = .851; 6-min walk distance 50 ± 61 vs. 93 ± 134 m in age ≥ 65, p = .066), biomarkers (ΔN-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide −139 ± 246 vs. −168 ± 181 age ≥ 65,p = .629) and HF symptoms (Short Form-36 survey Δphysical component summary p = .483/Δmental component summary, p = .841).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing CA for AF with systolic HF in the absence of ventricular scar, comparable improvements in ventricular function, symptoms, and freedom from AF are achieved irrespective of age.     

Long‐Term Results of Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function

AF Ablation and Impaired Left Ventricular Function. Introduction: Long‐term outcome of AF ablation in patients with impaired LVEF is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance, clinical status, and echocardiographic parameters over a long‐term period following atrial fibrillation (AF) transcatheter ablation in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. Methods and Results: A total of 196 patients (87.2% males, age 60.5 ± 10.2 years) with LVEF <50% underwent radiofrequency transcatheter ablation for paroxysmal (22.4%) or persistent (77.6%) AF. Patients were followed up for 46.2 (16.4–63.5) months regarding AF recurrences, functional class, and echocardiographic parameters. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation, while 167 (85.2%) required additional atrial lesions. Eleven (5.6%) patients suffered procedural complications. During follow‐up, 58 (29.6%) patients required repeated ablations. At the follow‐up end, 15 (7.7%) patients died, while 74 (37.8%) documented at least one episode of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial ectopic tachycardia. Eighty‐three (47.2%) patients maintained antiarrhythmic drugs. During follow‐up, NYHA class improved by at least one class more frequently among patients maintaining SR compared to those experiencing relapses (70.6% vs 47.9%, P = 0.003). LVEF showed a broader relative increase in patients maintaining SR (32.7% vs 21.4%; P = 0.047) and mitral regurgitation grading significantly decreased (P <0.001) only within these patients. At multivariable analysis SR maintenance emerged as an independent predictor (odds ratio 4.26, 95% CI 1.69–10.74, P = 0.002) of long‐term clinical improvement (reduction in NYHA class ≥1 and relative increase in LVEF ≥10%). Conclusions: Although not substantially worse than in patients with preserved LVEF, AF ablation in patients with impaired LVEF is affected by high long‐term recurrence rate. Among these patients SR maintenance is associated with greater clinical improvement. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 24‐32, January 2013)     

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Re‐Isolation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation . Aim: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence, necessitating repeat ablation procedures. The aim of this prospective randomized patient‐blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon (Cryo) versus radiofrequency (RF) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure. Methods: Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to Cryo or RF redo ablation. The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia, after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow‐up. All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm. Patients with an AF burden (AF%) ≤ 0.5% were considered AF‐free (Responders), while those with an AF% > 0.5% were classified as patients with AF recurrences (non‐Responders). Results: Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to Cryo (N = 40) or to RF (N = 40). Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs (1.9 ± 0.8 per patient) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs (1.7 ± 0.8 per patient) in RF Group (P = 0.62), all of which were targeted. In Cryo group, 68 (88%) of the 77 PVs were re‐isolated using only Cryo technique; the remaining 9 PVs were re‐isolated using RF. In RF group, all 72 PVs were successfully re‐isolated (P = 0.003 vs Cryo). By intention‐to‐treat, 23 (58%) RF patients were AF‐free vs 17 (43%) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year (P = 0.06). Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group; the RF group had no complications. Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation, 11 (38%) were AF‐free vs 20 (59%) of the 34 patients who had RF only (P = 0.021). Conclusion: When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF, RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 274‐279, March 2013)     

Reversal of cardiomyopathy in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to tachycardia

Objectives

Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TCM) is a reversible cause of heart failure. Little is known of the characteristics of tachycardia associated with the development of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and the reversal of cardiomyopathy after cure of tachycardia. This study aimed to examine the reversal of cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing ablation with congestive heart failure secondary to tachycardia.

Methods

A total of 625 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation for tachycardiarrhymias between January 2009 and July 2011. Echocardiography analysis was performed to identify patients with depressed LV function, defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction <50 %. Patients with preexisting structural heart disease (n?=?10) were excluded. NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assessment was performed before ablation in patients considered to have TCM (n?=?17). Repeated echocardiography study and NT-proBNP assessment were measured after a mean follow-up of 3 months. Levels of NT-proBNP before and after ablation were compared. Reversal of cardiomyopathy was also assessed.

Results

The incidence of TCM was 2.7 % (12 males; age, 35.8?±?17.1 years). Successful ablation was performed in 16 of 17 patients (94.1 %). There was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (36.7?±?7.5 vs. 59.4?±?9.7 %; P?<?0.001). The mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter before treatment was 59.5?±?8.3 mm (range, 43 to 70), compared with 51.9?±?7.4 mm (range, 40 to 67) (P?=?0.009) after 3 months follow-up. The levels of NT-proBNP decreased after ablation procedure, from 4,092.6?±?3,916.6 to 478.9?±?881.9 pg/ml (P?<?0.001). After successful ablation, ventricular function normalized in 15 of 17 (88.2 %) patients at a mean of 3 months.

Conclusions

Restoration of LV function and reversal of LV remodeling can be achieved with successful elimination of tachycardia in the majority of patients. NT-proBNP level elevates in subjects with TCM and decreases sharply after ablation.     

Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in isolated ventricular noncompaction in adults: follow-up of four cases

Background: An isolated ventricular noncompaction (IVNC) is an unclassified cardiomyopathy and, despite the increasing awareness of and interest in this disorder, the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains obscure. Objective: The purpose of this study was to clarify the long‐term effect of CRT on IVNC in adult patients. Methods: Four cases of IVNC were included in this study. Before the CRT device was implanted, all four patients (54 ± 16‐year‐old, 4 males) presented with symptomatic congestive heart failure. Echocardiography revealed their systolic dysfunction and their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 21 ± 8%. There was also mechanical dyssynchrony observed between the LV septum and free wall area. The QRS duration was “narrow” (112 and 120 ms) in two patients. One patient had been resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF) and two had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). A CRT defibrillator (CRT‐D) was implanted in three patients with VT/VF and a CRT pacemaker (CRT‐P) in a patient without VT/VF. The LV lead was positioned in a lateral branch of the coronary sinus where a thickened noncompacted wall existed. Results: During the follow‐up period (28 ± 23 months), their congestive heart failure had improved in terms of the cardiothoracic ratio on the chest X‐ray, B‐type natriuretic peptide level, LV systolic dimension, and LVEF. No episodes of defibrillation shocks were observed. Conclusion: CRT may improve the prognosis and quality‐of‐life in patients with an IVNC with mechanical dyssynchrony.     

Impact of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Introduction and AimsCatheter ablation has been shown to improve left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). Our aim was to assess the impact of AF ablation on the outcome of patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational cohort study of all patients with HF and LVEF <50% and with no apparent cause for systolic dysfunction other than AF who underwent catheter ablation in a tertiary referral center between July 2016 and November 2018. The primary endpoint was a ≥5% improvement in LVEF. Secondary endpoints included improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and reduction in LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left atrial diameter (LAD).ResultsOf 153 patients who underwent AF ablation in this period, 22 (77% male, median age 61 [IQR 54-64] years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 11.1 months (IQR 6.1-19.0). After ablation, median LVEF increased from 40% (IQR 33-41) to 58% (IQR 55-62) (p<0.01), mean NYHA class improved from 2.35±0.49 to 1.3±0.47 (p<0.001), and median LAD and LVEDD decreased from 48.0 (IQR 43.5-51.5) mm to 44 (IQR 40-49) mm (p<0.01) and from 61.0 (IQR 54.0-64.8) mm to 55.0 (52.2-58.0) mm (p<0.01), respectively.ConclusionIn patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction, AF ablation is associated not only with improved functional status but also with favorable structural remodeling, including improvement in LVEF and decreases in LAD and LVEDD.     

Incidence of asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism after atrial fibrillation ablation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram

Cerebral Microthromboembolism After CFAE Ablation . Background: The incidence of cerebral thromboembolism after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ranges from 2% to 14%. This study investigated the incidence of cerebral thromboembolism after complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation with or without PVI. Methods: One hundred consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (50 paroxysmal and 50 persistent, including 10 longstanding) who underwent CFAE ablation combined with (n = 41, PVI+CFAE group) or without (n = 59, CFAE group) PVI were studied. Coronary angiography (CAG) was conducted with AF ablation in 5 cases in which coronary artery stenosis was suspected on 3D‐computed tomography. PVI was performed before CFAE ablation without circular catheter during AF. After termination of AF, additional ablation was performed to complete PVI with a circular catheter. All patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion‐weighted MRI and T2‐weighted MRI the day after ablation. Results: New thromboembolism was detected in 7.0%, and there was no significant difference between the 2 strategies (7.3% in PVI+CFAE group, 6.8% in CFAE group). CHADS2 score (1.6 ± 1.0 vs 0.8 ± 0.9, P < 0.05), left atrial volume (LAV; 83.8 ± 27.1 vs 67.8 ± 21.8, P < 0.05), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 53.1 ± 9.2 vs 65.1 ± 9.7, P < 0.01) were significantly different when comparing patients with or without thromboembolism. In multivariate analysis, LVEF (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–0.99; P < 0.05) and concomitant CAG (OR 18.82; 95% CI, 1.77–200.00; P < 0.05) were important predictors of new cerebral thromboembolism. Conclusions: The incidence of cerebral microthromboembolism after CFAE ablation was not greater than previous reports in PVI. Cautious management is required during AF ablation, especially in the patients with low LVEF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 567–573, June 2012)     

Characteristics of premature ventricular complexes as correlates of reduced left ventricular systolic function: study of the burden, duration, coupling interval, morphology and site of origin of PVCs

PVCs and Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Background: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can cause a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated whether the site of origin and other PVC characteristics are associated with LVEF. Methods: We retrospectively studied 70 consecutive patients (mean age 42 ± 17 years, 40 [57%] female) with no other cause of cardiomyopathy undergoing ablation of PVCs. We analyzed the association of a reduced LVEF, defined by LVEF <50% on echocardiography, with features of PVCs obtained from electrocardiography, 24‐ or 48‐hour Holter monitor and electrophysiology study. Results: Patients with reduced LVEF (n = 17) as compared to normal LVEF (n = 53) had an increased burden of PVCs (29.3 ± 14.6% vs 16.7 ± 13.7%, P = 0.004), higher prevalence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) [13 (76%) vs 21 (40%), P = 0.01], longer PVC duration (154.3 ± 22.9 vs 145.6 ± 20.8 ms, P = 0.03) and higher prevalence of multiform PVCs [15 (88%) vs 31 (58%), P = 0.04]. There was no significant difference in prevalence of sustained VT, QRS duration of normally conducted complexes, PVC coupling interval, or delay in PVC intrinsicoid deflection. Patients with fascicular PVCs (n = 5) had higher mean LVEF compared to others (66.2 ± 4.0% vs 53.0 ± 10.0%, P = 0.002). There was no association of LVEF with other PVC foci or with left‐bundle versus right‐bundle branch block morphologies. The threshold burden of PVCs associated with reduced LVEF was lower for right as compared to left ventricular PVCs. Conclusion: In addition to the PVC burden, other characteristics like a longer PVC duration, presence of nonsustained VT, multiform PVCs and right ventricular PVCs might be associated with cardiomyopathy. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 791‐798, July 2011)     

Impact of adenosine-provoked acute dormant pulmonary vein conduction on recurrence of atrial fibrillation

Impact of ATP Reconduction on AF Recurrence. Introduction: Adenosine can be associated with acute recovery of conduction to the pulmonary veins (PVs) immediately after isolation. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the response to adenosine predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after a single ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods and Results: A total of 109 consecutive patients (61 ± 10 years; 91 males) with drug‐refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation were analyzed. After PV antrum isolation (PVAI), dormant PV conduction was evaluated by an administration of adenosine in all patients. No acute reconnections were provoked by the adenosine in 70 (64.2%) patients (Group‐1), but they were provoked in at least one side of the ipsilateral PVs in 39 (35.8%) patients (Group‐2). All adenosine‐provoked dormant conductions were successfully eliminated by additional ablation applications. By 12 months after the initial procedure, 72 (66.1%) patients were free of AF recurrences without any antiarrhythmic drugs. A Cox regression multivariate analysis of the variables including the adenosine‐provoked reconductions, age, gender, duration of AF, presence of hypertension or structural heart disease, left atrial size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and body mass index demonstrated that adenosine‐provoked reconductions were an independent predictor of AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure (hazard ratio: 1.387; 95% confidence interval: 1.018–1.889, P = 0.038). At the repeat session for recurrent AF, conduction recovery was observed similarly in both groups (P = 0.27). Conclusion: Even after the elimination of any adenosine‐provoked dormant PV conduction, the appearance of acute adenosine‐provoked reconduction after the PVAI was an independent predictor of AF recurrence after a single AF ablation procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23 p. 256‐260, March 2012.)     

RF ablation of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation in patient with familial dilated cardiomyopathy

A vicious circle of interactions between dilated cardiomyopathy and longstanding persistent AF/AFL may cause symptoms of advanced congestive heart failure. In a 31-year-old patient with diagnosis of familial dilated cardiomyopathy and permanent AF lasting for five years, gradually decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and increased diameter of heart chambers - left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVdD) 7.7 cm, left atrium (LA) 5.4 cm, and LVEF 15% were noted. Pharmacological treatment was ineffective Successful RF ablation of AF/AFL substrate (CTI block, PVs isolation, CFAE ablation, roof and MIG line, CS applications) reversed symptoms of significant heart remodeling (LVdD 5.9 cm, LA 4.3 cm, LVEF 50%).     

Comparison of ThermoCool® Surround Flow Catheter Versus ThermoCool® Catheter in Achieving Persistent Electrical Isolation of Pulmonary Veins: A Pilot Study

Persistent Electrical Isolation of Pulmonary Veins . Introduction: Aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of the new ThermoCool Surround Flow® catheter (SFc) versus the ThermoCool® (TCc) in achieving persistent circumferential electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results: This multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled patients suffering from paroxysmal AF. Randomization was run in a one‐to‐one fashion between radiofrequency ablation by TCc or SFc. Aim of PVs ablation was documentation of electrical isolation with exit/entrance block recorded on a circular catheter. Among the 106 enrolled patients, 52 (49.0%) were randomized to TCc and 54 (51.0%) to SFc. Total volume of infused saline solution during the procedure was lower in the SFc than in TCc group (752.7 ± 268.6 mL vs 1,165.9 ± 436.2 mL, P < 0.0001). Number of identified and isolated PVs was similar in the 2 groups. Number of PVs remaining isolated 30 minutes after ablation was higher in the SFc than in TCc group (95.2% vs 90.5%, P < 0.03), mainly driven by acute ablation result in the left PVs (96.1% vs 89.7%, P < 0.04). Complications were seldom and observed only in the TCc group (0% vs 3.84%, P < 0.03). At 6‐month follow‐up SFc patients reported a trend toward less AF recurrences compared to those in the TCc group (22.9% vs 27.0%, P = 0.69). Conclusion: PV isolation by SFc lowered the rate of left PV early reconnections and reduced the volume of infused saline solution while maintaining the safety profile of AF ablation. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 269‐273, March 2013)     

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are often coexisting major public health burdens. Although several studies have reported partial restoration of systolic left ventricular (LV) function after catheter ablation for AF, the method is not widely applied in patients with LV dysfunction. We reviewed the results of AF ablation in patients with systolic LV dysfunction.

Methods and Results

PubMed was searched for studies published after 2000 reporting original data on AF catheter ablation in adult patients with systolic LV dysfunction. Primary end point was the change of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after catheter ablation; secondary endpoints were the changes of exercise capacity and quality of life after the procedure. We calculated mean difference (MD) of LVEF and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was investigated by I² statistic, publication bias with Egger's test. The impact of covariates on LVEF improvement was evaluated with meta-regression analyses. Nine studies with a total of 354 patients with systolic LV dysfunction were analyzed. Study patients were mainly male with mean age 49 to 62 years, LVEF was moderately impaired and ranged in all but 1 study from 35% to 43%. LVEF improved after ablation with a MD of 11.1% (95% CI: 7.1–15.2, P < .001). Heterogeneity among analyzed studies was significant (I² = 92.9, P < .001). No potential publication bias was found. In meta-regression analyses, the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease was inversely related with LVEF improvement (P < .0001) whereas there was no association between the LVEF change and the proportion of patients with nonparoxysmal AF or the proportion of patients without AF recurrences during follow-up.

Conclusions

AF ablation in patients with systolic LV dysfunction results in significant improvement of LV function, but the extent of this improvement is heterogeneous. Patients with coronary artery disease seem to benefit less than patients with other underlying diseases. These results may be explained by patient selection.     

Results of Short‐Term and Long‐Term Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using Duty‐Cycled Bipolar and Unipolar Radiofrequency Energy

PV Isolation Using Bipolar/Unipolar RF Energy . Background: Electrical disconnection of the pulmonary veins (PV) plays an important role in the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Antral ablation using a conventional steerable ablation catheter often is technically challenging and time consuming. Methods: Eighty‐eight patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent ablation with a circular mapping/ablation decapolar catheter (PVAC). Ablation was performed in the antral region of the PVs with a power‐modulated bipolar/unipolar radiofrequency (RF) generator using 8–10 W delivered simultaneously through 2–10 electrodes, as selected by the operator. Seven‐day Holter monitor recordings were performed off antiarrhythmic drugs at 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month follow‐up, and patients were requested to visit the hospital in the event of ongoing palpitations. All follow‐up patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 with a follow‐up of less than 1 year and group 2 patients completing a 1‐year follow‐up. Results: Overall, 338 of 339 targeted PVs (99%) were isolated with the PVAC with a mean of 24 ± 9 RF applications per patient, a mean total procedure time of 125 ± 28 minutes, and a mean fluoroscopy time of 21 ± 13 minutes. Freedom from AF off antiarrhythmic drugs was found in 82 and 79% of group 1 and group 2 patients, respectively. No procedure‐related complications were observed. Conclusion: PV isolation by duty‐cycled unipolar/bipolar RF ablation can be effectively and safely performed with a circular, decapolar catheter. Twelve‐month follow‐up data compare favorably with early postablation results, indicating stable effects over time. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 399–405, April 2010)     

Substrate and procedural predictors of outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often accompanied by atrial fibrillation (AF) due to diastolic dysfunction, elevated left atrial pressure, and enlargement. Although catheter ablation for drug‐refractory AF is an effective treatment, the efficacy in HCM remains to be established. Methods: Thirty‐three consecutive patients (25 male, age 51 ± 11 years) with HCM underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (n = 8) or wide area circumferential ablation with additional linear ablation (n = 25) for drug‐refractory AF. Twelve‐lead and 24‐hour ambulating ECGs, echocardiograms, event monitor strips, and SF 36 quality of life (QOL) surveys were obtained before ablation and for routine follow‐up. Results: Twenty‐one (64%) patients had paroxysmal AF and 12 (36%) had persistent/permanent AF for 6.2 ± 5.2 years. The average ejection fraction was 0.63 ± 0.12. The average left atrial volume index was 70 ± 24 mL/m 2 . Over a follow‐up of 1.5 ± 1.2 years, 1‐year survival with AF elimination was 62%(Confidence Interval [CI]: 66‐84) and with AF control was 75%(CI: 66‐84). AF control was less likely in patients with a persistent/chronic AF, larger left atrial volumes, and more advanced diastolic disease. Additional linear ablation may improve outcomes in patient with severe left atrial enlargement and more advanced diastolic dysfunction. Two patients had a periprocedureal TIA, one PV stenosis, and one died after mitral valve replacement from prosthetic valve thrombosis. QOL scores improved from baseline at 3 and 12 months. Conclusion: Outcomes after AF ablation in patients with HCM are favorable. Diastolic dysfunction, left atrial enlargement, and AF subtype influence outcomes. Future studies of rhythm management approaches in HCM patients are required to clarify the optimal clinical approach.     

Impact of Radiofrequency Characteristics on Acute Pulmonary Vein Reconnection and Clinical Outcome After PVAC Ablation

Impact of Radiofrequency Characteristics . Objective: The objective was to study the impact of radiofrequency (RF) characteristics on acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) and outcome after PVAC ablation. PVI with additional ablation of PVR (PVI + PVR) was compared to PVI‐only. Methods: In 40 consecutive patients, after PVAC‐guided PVI, adenosine and a 1‐hour waiting time were used to unmask and ablate acute PVR (PVI + PVR group). RF‐characteristics and 1‐year AF freedom were compared post hoc to 40 clinically matched patients undergoing PVI only (PVI‐only group). Custom‐made software was used to assess RF characteristics of the PVAC applications needed to obtain baseline PVI. Results: There was no difference in clinical characteristics or baseline RF‐profile between both groups. Acute PVR was observed and ablated in 38 of 160 veins (24%). AF‐freedom after PVI + PVR was higher than PVI (85% vs 65%, P < 0.05). Within the PVI group, comparing patients with and without AF‐recurrence, the percentage of PVAC applications with high T° (>48°) but low power (<3W) was higher (28 ± 18% vs 11 ± 11%, P < 0.0001). Within the PVI + PVR group, when comparing PVs with and without PVR, the percentage of low power/high T° PVAC applications was also higher (27 ± 13% vs 13 ± 15%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: (1) After PVAC ablation, 24% of PVs exhibit acute reconnection. Additional ablation of reconnection improves clinical outcome. (2) Acute reconnection as well as clinical recurrence of AF are characterized by PVAC ablation with a considerable number of applications with high temperature but low power. (3) If PV isolation is obtained with low power applications, a consistent use of both adenosine and waiting time is required. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 290‐296, March 2013)     

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrences of Atrial Tachycardia After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Early Recurrence After AF Ablation. Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) commonly recurs within 3 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether early recurrence of atrial tachycardia (ERAT) predicts late recurrence of AF or AT. Methods: Of 352 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with or without linear ablation(s) for AF, 56 patients (15.9%) with ERAT were identified by retrospective analysis. ERAT was defined as early relapse of AT within a 3‐month blanking period after ablation. Results: During 21.7 ± 12.5 months, the rate of late recurrence was higher in patients with ERAT (41.1%) compared with those without ERAT (11.8%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, positive inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation (65.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.046; odd ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–14.6) and the number of patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (73.9% vs 42.4%, P = 0.042; odd ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–19.5) were significantly related to late recurrence in the ERAT group. The duration of ablation (174.3 ± 62.3 vs 114.7 ± 39.5 minutes, P = 0.046) and the procedure time (329.3 ± 83.4 vs 279.2 ± 79.7 minutes, P = 0.027) were significantly longer in patients with late recurrence than in those without late recurrence following ERAT. Conclusions: The late recurrence rate is higher in the patients with ERAT compared with those without ERAT following AF ablation, and is more often noted in the patients who underwent CTI ablation and had a prolonged procedure time. Furthermore, inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation independently predicts late recurrence in patients with ERAT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1331‐1337, December 2010)     

Impact of a patent foramen ovale on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

Introduction: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is located at the anterior and superior part of the anatomical interatrial septum, the area that is targeted during transseptal puncture. This study sought to investigate the impact of accessing the left atrium via a PFO on paroxysmal AF ablation. Methods: From March 2004, 203 patients (55 ± 11 years) underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF (80 ± 71 months), with the endpoint being electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins (PV) and AF noninducibility. The presence of a PFO was determined by both transesophageal echocardiography and catheter probing. Procedural difficulty was evaluated by radiofrequency (RF), procedural, and fluoroscopic durations. Clinical follow‐up was also investigated. Results: A PFO was detected in 27 patients (13%) by transesophageal echocardiography and in 22 additional patients (total 49 patients, 24%), by catheter probing (P < 0.001). A PFO was associated with longer total RF applications (57 ± 19 vs 51 ± 18 min, P = 0.04) and RF applications to isolate the PVs (42 ± 16 vs 35 ± 12 min, P = 0.001). Procedural and fluoroscopic times were unaffected. Seventy‐three patients (36%) required a second procedure; there was no difference in the number of PV reconnections (1.3 vs 1.8 veins, P = NS). After a mean follow‐up of 19 ± 9 months, 194/203 patients (96%) were free of AF, with no difference in patients in whom a PFO had been used. Conclusion: Although isolation of PVs is longer, overall procedural duration and success is not affected when using a PFO compared with a transseptal puncture. The presence of a PFO is underestimated by transesophageal echocardiography with brachial injection when compared with catheter probing.     

Upgrading to biventricular pacing guided by pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation

Pressure–Volume Loop Analyses during CRT Implants. Introduction: cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may improve prognosis in patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing, and optimal lead position can decrease nonresponders. We evaluated the clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT in patients with previous chronic RV pacing, using pressure–volume loop analyses to determine the optimal left ventricular (LV) lead position during implantation. Methods and Results: In this single‐blinded, randomized, controlled crossover study, 40 patients with chronic RV apical pacing and symptoms of heart failure, decreased LV ejection fraction (LVEF) or dyssynchrony were included. During implantation, stroke work (SW), LVEF, cardiac output, and LV dP/dt_max were assessed by a conductance catheter. Clinical and echocardiographic response was studied during a 3‐month period of RV pacing (RV period, LV lead inactive) and a 3‐month period of biventricular pacing (CRT period). At the optimal LV lead position, SW (37 ± 41%), LVEF (16 ± 13%), cardiac output (29 ± 16%), and LV dP/dt_max increased (11 ± 11%) significantly during biventricular pacing compared to baseline. Additional benefit could be achieved by pressure–volume loop guided selection of the best left‐sided pacing location. RV outflow tract pacing did not improve hemodynamics. During follow‐up, symptoms improved during CRT, VO_2,max increased 10% and significant improvements in LVEF, LV volumes, and mitral regurgitation were observed as compared to the RV period. Conclusions: CRT in patients with chronic RV pacing causes significant improvement of both LV function as measured by pressure–volume loops during implantation and clinical and echocardiographic improvement during follow‐up. Pressure–volume loops during implantation may facilitate selection of the most optimal pacing site . (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 677‐683, June 2011)