Interobserver and intraobserver variation in endoscopic assessment of GERD using the "Los Angeles" classification.

BACKGROUND: A new endoscopic classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been proposed, and the term mucosal break has been introduced to describe mucosal damage. This new classification was evaluated by endoscopists with different levels of experience. METHODS: Fifty endoscopic photographs for each of 20 randomly selected patients with GERD were assessed retrospectively by three groups of seven endoscopists classified by experience: group 1 (100 to 500 procedures), group 2 (500 to 3000), and group 3 (more than 3000). The new classification was modified by adding grade 0 to describe healed mucosal breaks, so that there were five grades. All photographs were assessed twice at an interval of more than 1 week, and kappa statistics were used to determine observer variation. RESULTS: Interobserver variation within group 3 (kappa = 0.39, n = 21) and between groups 3 and 2 (kappa = 0.36, n = 49) was significantly different (p < 0.01) from that between groups 3 and 1 (kappa = 0.26, n = 49). Intraobserver variation in group 1 (kappa = 0.39, n = 7) was significantly different (p < 0.01) from that in group 2 (kappa = 0.51, n = 7) and group 3 (kappa = 0.54, n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: Observer variation depends on level of endoscopic experience. Only experienced endoscopists should use the new classification for grading of GERD.     

Interobserver and intraobserver variation in endoscopic assessment of GERD using the “Los Angeles” classification

Background: A new endoscopic classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been proposed, and the term mucosal break has been introduced to describe mucosal damage. This new classification was evaluated by endoscopists with different levels of experience. Methods: Fifty endoscopic photographs for each of 20 randomly selected patients with GERD were assessed retrospectively by three groups of seven endoscopists classified by experience: group 1 (100 to 500 procedures), group 2 (500 to 3000), and group 3 (more than 3000). The new classification was modified by adding grade 0 to describe healed mucosal breaks, so that there were five grades. All photographs were assessed twice at an interval of more than 1 week, and κ statistics were used to determine observer variation. Results: Interobserver variation within group 3 (κ = 0.39, n = 21) and between groups 3 and 2 (κ = 0.36, n = 49) was significantly different (p < 0.01) from that between groups 3 and 1 (κ = 0.26, n = 49). Intraobserver variation in group 1 (κ = 0.39, n = 7) was significantly different (p < 0.01) from that in group 2 (κ = 0.51, n = 7) and group 3 (κ = 0.54, n = 7). Conclusions: Observer variation depends on level of endoscopic experience. Only experienced endoscopists should use the new classification for grading of GERD. (Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:700-4.)     

Comparison of inter- and intraobserver consistency for grading of esophagitis by expert and trainee endoscopists

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated intra- and interobserver variability in the endoscopic scoring of esophagitis by using two grading schemes, the Los Angeles and Hetzel-Dent scales. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-five endoscopic photographs of esophagitis or healed esophagitis were randomly displayed twice to 9 endoscopist evaluators (4 experts, 5 trainees) by means of a CD-ROM. Evaluators scored each photograph by using both classification schemes. The analysis was based on the kappa (kappa) statistic as a measure of consistency. RESULTS: For trainees, intraobserver reproducibility was good (kappa = 0.436) when using the Los Angeles classification and marginal (kappa = 0.395) by using the Hetzel-Dent classification. For experts, intraobserver reproducibility was better by using both the Los Angeles (kappa = 0.545) and Hetzel-Dent classification (kappa = 0.552). Interobserver consistency for trainees was good when using both classifications (Los Angeles, kappa = 0.459; Hetzel-Dent, kappa = 0.427). Again, intraobserver reproducibility was better for experts when using both classifications (Los Angeles, kappa = 0.556, Hetzel-Dent, kappa = 0.571). By using the Los Angeles classification, only 5.1% and 7.5% of the photographs were interpreted to be more than 1 grade different from the mean grade for, respectively, experts and trainees. This same consistency was found by using the Hetzel-Dent classification scheme (experts 5.1%, trainees 10.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility in grading esophagitis was good for both expert endoscopists and fellows, although there was greater consistency among the experts. Both the Los Angeles and Hetzel-Dent scoring systems are reproducible.     

Endoscopic classification for reflux pharyngolaryngitis

The quality of life in patients who have undergone surgery for esophageal cancer is frequently disturbed by postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease or pharyngolaryngeal reflux disease. Recently, there have been many reports on gastroesophageal reflux disease after esophagectomy, and only a few on pharyngolaryngeal reflux disease. There is not yet any convenient endoscopic classification of reflux pharyngolaryngitis. We designed a new classification for reflux pharyngolaryngitis based on endoscopic findings. Our new classification consists of the five grades from 0 to IV based on (i) the extent and severity of erythema and/or edema in the pharynx and the larynx, and (ii) the extent and severity of granulation or scarring stenosis in the vocal cords. Ninety‐three patients after cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy (the CEG group) and 28 patients after intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy (the TEG group) were reviewed in this study. We investigated the relation between the severity of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and clinical symptoms in these patients, and the correlation between this new classification of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and the Los Angeles classification of reflux esophagitis. Reflux esophagitis was more severe in the TEG group than in the CEG group, while there was no difference in the grading of reflux pharyngolaryngitis between the two groups. The pharyngolaryngeal symptoms and F‐scale scores were not correlated with the severity of reflux pharyngolaryngitis in each group. The grading of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and that of reflux esophagitis was correlated in each group (P < 0.001 in the CEG group and P= 0.002 in the TEG group). We proposed a new endoscopic classification of reflux pharyngolaryngitis. The new classification of reflux pharyngolaryngitis correlated fairly well with the Los Angeles classification of reflux esophagitis, although this classification did not correlate with the clinical symptoms in patients who underwent esophagectomy. Follow‐up attention including upper endoscopy should be paid to reflux pharyngolaryngitis in patients after esophagogastrostomy as well as reflux esophagitis, because there is often a lack in symptoms regardless of high incidence of pharyngolaryngitis.     

Endoscopic Experience Improves Interobserver Agreement in the Grading of Esophagitis by Los Angeles Classification: Conventional Endoscopy and Optimal Band Image System

Background/Aims

Interobserver variation by experience was documented for the diagnosis of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether interobserver agreement can be improved by higher levels of endoscopic experience in the diagnosis of erosive esophagitis.

Methods

Endoscopic images of 51 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were obtained with conventional endoscopy and optimal band imaging (OBI). Endoscopists were divided into an expert group (16 gastroenterologic endoscopic specialists guaranteed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) and a trainee group (individuals with fellowships, first year of specialty training in gastroenterology). All endoscopists had no or minimal experience with OBI. GERD was diagnosed using the Los Angeles classification with or without OBI.

Results

The mean weighted paired κ statistics for interobserver agreement in grading erosive esophagitis by conventional endoscopy in the expert group was better than that in the trainee group (0.51 vs 0.42, p<0.05). The mean weighted paired k statistics in the expert group and in the trainee group based on conventional endoscopy with OBI did not differ (0.42, 0.42).

Conclusions

Interobserver agreement in the expert group using conventional endoscopy was better than that in the trainee group. Endoscopic experience can improve the interobserver agreement in the grading of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification.     

Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility and hyperactive acid sensitization in patients with gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Esophageal motor abnormalities including ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and visceral hypersensitivity have been frequently observed in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. The aim of this study was to observe the incidences of hypersensitivity to acid infusion and motor abnormalities in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) compared with erosive esophagitis. METHODS: We performed upper GI endoscopy, an acid perfusion test and esophageal manometry on 113 NERD patients and 37 erosive esophagitis patients. RESULTS: The frequency of acid sensitization was 69.9% in NERD and 67.6% in erosive esophagitis. The frequency of esophageal motor abnormality in patients with erosive esophagitis (48.6%) was higher than in patients with NERD (25.7%, P = 0.014). The most frequent esophageal motor abnormality was IEM. The frequency of IEM was 15.9% in NERD patients, 42.9% in Los Angeles grade A, 53.8% in Los Angeles grade B and 66.7% in Los Angeles grade C esophagitis (chi(2) = 16.67, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that no difference exists between visceral hypersensitivity in patients with NERD and those with erosive esophagitis, and that IEM occurs in NERD as well as erosive esophagitis patients. The occurrence of IEM is associated with the endoscopic severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Difference in localization of esophageal mucosal breaks among grades of esophagitis

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux occurs mainly during the daytime in patients with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis, but predominantly during the night in patients with grade C and D esophagitis. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate whether this difference in the pattern of gastroesophageal reflux influences the circumferential localization of erosions in the esophageal wall. METHODS: The subjects were 394 consecutive patients diagnosed endoscopically as having reflux esophagitis (grade A, n = 223; B, n = 93; C, n = 53; D, n = 25 cases). Their endoscopic films were reviewed retrospectively to determine the circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks, and also the prevalence and size of hiatal hernia (HH). RESULTS: The numbers of mucosal breaks analyzed in patients with grade A, B and C esophagitis were 321, 173 and 54, respectively. Patients with grade A and B esophagitis had longitudinal mucosal breaks mainly in the right-anterior wall of the lower esophagus, whereas patients with grade C esophagitis had transverse mucosal breaks mainly in the posterior wall. The prevalence and size of HH was significantly higher and larger, respectively, in patients with grade C or D esophagitis than in those with grade A and B esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks differs significantly among different grades of esophagitis.     

Predominant nocturnal acid reflux in patients with Los Angeles grade C and D reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (NAB) is defined as an intragastric pH < 4.0 lasting more than 1 h during the night in patients taking a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with nocturnal gastroesophageal acid reflux accompanied by NAB are thought to be refractory to PPI treatment. The aim of this study was to endoscopically identify the patients with predominant nocturnal gastroesophageal acid reflux. METHODS: The subjects were 37 patients with erosive reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles classification (LA) grade A, 12; B, 10; C, eight; and D, seven cases) and a control group of 20 patients without esophagitis. The results of ambulatory 24 h gastric and esophageal pH monitoring were compared among different grades of esophagitis. RESULTS: Gastroesophageal reflux during 24 h in patients with high-grade esophagitis was more frequent than for patients with low-grade esophagitis or no esophagitis. Although the length of esophageal acid exposure (percentage time with pH < 4.0) in patients with grade A or without esophagitis was longer in the daytime, that in patients with grades C and D was longer during the night. The reason for the delayed nocturnal acid exposure was the longer nocturnal acid clearance in high-grade reflux esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal exposure of the esophagus to acid occurs frequently in patients with LA grades C and D esophagitis. Thus, the existence of NAB with resulting nocturnal acid reflux should be considered when the patient with high-grade esophagitis shows resistance to PPI treatment.     

Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease, reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease among Chinese patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination

AIM： To analyze the spectrum and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD） based on presenting symptoms and endoscopic findings. METHODS： A cross-sectional survey in a cluster random sample was conducted from November 2004 to June 2005 using a validated Chinese version Reflux Disease Questionnaire （RDQ） and other items recording the demographic characteristics and potential risk factors for GERD. Subjects were defined as having GERD symptoms according to the RDQ score （〉 12）. All subjects were endoscopied and the definition and severity of erosive esophagitis were evaluated by Los Angeles classification. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS13.0 programs. RESULTS： Of 2231 recruited participants, 701 （31.40%） patients were diagnosed as having GERD while 464 （20.80%） patients had objective findings of reflux esophagitis （RE）. Of those 464 patients, only 291 （13.00%） were reported as subjects with GERD symptoms. A total of 528 （23.70%） patients were found to have GERD symptoms, including 19.50% patients with grade A or B reflux esophagitis, 0.90% with grade C and 0.40% with grade D. On multivariate analysis, old age, male, moderate working burden, divorced/widowed and strong tea drinking remained as significant independent risk factors for erosive esophagitis. Meanwhile, routine usage of greasy food and constipation were considered as significant independent risk factors for non-erosive reflux disease （NERD）. CONCLUSION： GERD is one of the common GI diseaseswith a high occurrence rate in China and its main associated factors include sex, anthropometrical variables and sociopsychological characteristics.     

Cardiac mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction: An Eastern perspective

AIM:To investigate the nature and origin of cardiac mucosa(CM).METHODS:Biopsy samples from sixty-one individuals were included in this study. The specimens were taken "at","just below",or "just above" the gastroesophageal junction,including the histologic squamocolumnar junction. Clinical data were obtained by reviewing electronic medical records for each patient. Patients with a history of stomach adenoma or carcinoma and esophageal carcinoma were excluded,and cases that were endoscopically suspicious of Barrett's esophagus or a polyp were also ruled out. Histologic and endoscopic reviews were performed blinded to the patient's clinical data. Histologic evaluation wasconducted by two pathologists,and endoscopic review was performed by a endoscopist with wide experience in the field. Histologically,the columnar epithelium of squamocolumnar junction,presence and severity of acute and chronic inflammation,atrophy,intestinal metaplasia,and presence of carditis were evaluated. Endoscopically,reflux esophagitis was evaluated by Los Angeles(LA) classification,hiatal hernias were classified by Hill grade,and gastroesophageal flap valves were assessed. RESULTS:Fifty-nine of the 61(96.7%) patients were Korean; 65.6%(40/61) of the patients underwent endoscopy according to the schedule of the National Health Insurance Program as a screening inspection. Of these,only 20.0%(8/40) of cases had reflux s y m p t o m s. C M w a s p r e s e n t i n 4 1 / 6 1( 6 7. 2 %) individuals,and its presence was associated with older age compared to oxyntocardiac mucosa/oxyntic mucosa(60.59 ± 2.02 years vs 51.55 ± 3.35 years; P = 0.018). The presence of CM was associated with endoscopic diagnosis of esophagitis according to the LA classification(P = 0.022). CM was associated with mononuclear cell infiltration and neutrophilic infiltration,which were statistically significant(P = 0.001,and P = 0.004,respectively). The inflammation of CM,"carditis",showed a statistically significant association with endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis according to the LA classification(P = 0.008). CONCLUSION:CM at the gastroesophageal junction is a common histologic finding in biopsy specimens,though not always present,and associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and carditis severity.     

40 mg pantoprazole and 40 mg esomeprazole are equivalent in the healing of esophageal lesions and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors are regarded as the most effective class of acid suppressive medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment. There is considerable interest regarding the dose equivalence between various proton pump inhibitors. GOALS: To compare the efficacy of pantoprazole and esomeprazole with regard to healing and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. STUDY: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease grades B/C (Los Angeles classification) received 40 mg pantoprazole daily (n = 113) or 40 mg esomeprazole daily (n = 114). Healing (endoscopy) and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms (direct questioning) were assessed at first and final visit (after 4, 6, 8, or 10 weeks of treatment). RESULTS: Overall healing in both treatment groups was 88% of patients (intention-to-treat population), 95% (pantoprazole), and 90% (esomeprazole) (per-protocol population); statistically, this indicates "at least equivalence" between treatments. Overall relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms was similar for pantoprazole (55%) and esomeprazole (51%, per-protoco). No correlation between healing and symptom relief was seen. The majority of reported adverse events were assessed as "not related" to the study drug. Pantoprazole and esomeprazole have comparably good safety and tolerability. CONCLUSION: In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 40 mg pantoprazole daily and 40 mg esomeprazole daily are equally effective for healing of esophageal lesions and relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms.     

Relationship of the frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease with endoscopic findings of cardiac sphincter morphology

Background  Kusano et al. developed a questionnaire for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG). The FSSG is now widely used in Japan. We investigated the relationship between FSSG results and cardiac sphincter endoscopic findings. Methods  The subjects were 470 patients who responded to the FSSG before undergoing endoscopy. From the FSSG results, we calculated the total, acid reflux, and dysmotility scores. Endoscopic findings were assessed in terms of the anatomic-functional-pathological (AFP) classification as the A factor, or degree and type of hiatal hernia, and the valve factor, or laxity of the cardiac sphincter. The degree of esophagitis was assessed using the modified Los Angeles classification. We investigated correlations between each score and the anatomy of the cardia. Results  With either definition of esophagitis (grade M or greater, or grade A or greater), the total and acid reflux scores were both significantly higher in the group with reflux esophagitis than in the group without reflux esophagitis. Examination of the relationship between FSSG scores and the A factor revealed no significant differences in the total, acid reflux, or dysmotility scores whether a hiatal hernia was present or absent. Similarly, examination of the valve factor showed no significant difference in any scores between V0 and V1 versus V1 and V2, indicating no correlation between cardiac sphincter laxity and FSSG scores. Conclusions  The FSSG was useful in determining whether reflux esophagitis is present, but it did not predict the anatomy of the cardia.     

Abnormal gastroesophageal flap valve is highly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease among subjects undergoing routine endoscopy in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: Gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade predicts severe gastroesophageal reflux disease in Caucasians, but its role in other populations is unclear. This study evaluated the significance of endoscopic grading of the GEFV in Taiwanese subjects. METHODS: Five hundred and six consecutive patients undergoing routine check-ups at the National Taiwan University Hospital were enrolled. Symptoms of upper gastrointestinal disease and endoscopic severity of esophageal mucosal injury were correlated to GEFV grades according to the Hill classification. RESULTS: The frequency of abnormal valves (Hill grades III or IV) was 27.3%. Of these, 42.7% had erosive esophagitis (EE). The majority of patients with EE were classified as Los Angeles grades A and B (79.7 and 16.9%, respectively). The prevalence of EE, hiatal hernia and, to a lesser degree, non-erosive reflux disease, increased with altered GEFV. Patients with abnormal valves were younger and more likely to be male, overweight, and to have atypical and extraesophageal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Taiwanese patients with abnormal GEFVs share similar characteristics and risk factors with the patients who have EE. Endoscopic grading of the GEFV is highly associated with GERD, and in particular EE, in subjects undergoing routine endoscopy.     

食管运动功能在重度反流性食管炎中的地位

目的　通过对重度反流性食管炎(RE)治愈前后食管体部运动功能的研究,了解食管体部运动功能在重度RE中的地位。方法　对70例胃食管反流病患者进行食管压力测定。从中筛选23例重度RE(内镜诊断为洛杉矶C和D级食管炎);且24h食管内pH监测证实为病理性酸反流;食管压力测定证实有食管体部运动障碍患者。给予兰索拉唑30mg/d治疗3~6个月至内镜下食管炎完全愈合后,再行食管压力测定,观察下食管括约肌静息压(LESP)及食管体部运动功能的变化。以湿咽成功率、食管远端收缩波幅和食管蠕动的传导速度作为食管体部运动功能的指标。结果　食管炎治愈前后,LESP[ (6 00±0 86 )mmHg比(5 10±0 87)mmHg, 1kPa=7 5mmHg, P=0 476],食管远端收缩波幅[ (34 1±4 1)mmHg比(37 2±4 0)mmHg,P=0 593]、湿咽成功率[ (33 5±6 5)%比(38 6±7 1 )%,P=0 592 ]比较差异均无统计学意义,其均值仍显著低于正常对照组。结论　治愈食管炎并不能提高LESP及改善食管体部的运动功能。食管体部运动功能障碍和酸反流是RE的重要发病机制,尤其是重度RE。     

Endoscopic reflux esophagitis in patients with upper abdominal pain-predominant dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: Reflux symptom assessment had reliable accuracy in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, patients may recognize heartburn or regurgitation as dyspepsia because of inaccurate understanding or atypical presentation. The aim of the present study was to estimate endoscopic reflux esophagitis in patients with upper abdominal pain as a predominant symptom in the absence of heartburn or regurgitation. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-three consecutive patients presenting dyspepsia without heartburn or regurgitation were enrolled. Patients with heartburn or regurgitation were excluded using the symptom interviewer method. Dyspepsia was categorized into pain-predominant or dysmotility-predominant groups according to the Rome II proposal. Endoscopic reflux esophagitis was graded using the Los Angeles classification. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were included in the pain-predominant group and 119 in the dysmotility-predominant group. Reflux esophagitis was found in 18.8% (42/224) of all dyspeptic patients. Grade A esophagitis was noted in 27.6% (29/105) of the pain-predominant group and in 7.6% (9/119) of the dysmotility-predominant group. Grade B was noted in two patients in each group. A total of 29.5% (31/105) and 9.3% (11/119) had reflux esophagitis, respectively (P < 0.001). Comparing patients with or without reflux esophagitis, there was no difference in body mass index, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, or Helicobacter pylori infection status. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients presenting dyspepsia, especially pain-predominant dyspepsia, have endoscopic reflux esophagitis. In view of GERD, pain-predominant dyspepsia should be investigated and managed differently from dysmotility-predominant dyspepsia.     

Intraobserver and interobserver consistency for grading esophagitis with narrow-band imaging

BACKGROUND: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a novel, noninvasive optical technique that adjusts reflected light to enhance the contrast between the esophageal mucosa and the gastric mucosa. Whether the use of this optical technique may increase consistency in describing the presence and severity of mucosal breaks remains elusive. OBJECTIVES: We compared the intra- and interobserver variations in the endoscopic scoring of esophagitis by using conventional imaging with and without NBI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with reflux. SETTING: Single center in Taiwan. PATIENTS: Endoscopic photographs of 230 patients with gastroesophageal reflux were obtained with both methods. Images were randomly displayed twice to 7 endoscopists, who independently scored each photograph by using the Los Angeles classification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: We calculated intra- and interobserver kappa statistics to measure the consistency in interpretations. RESULTS: With the addition of NBI, intraobserver reproducibility significantly improved with 3 of the 7 endoscopists. Interobserver reproducibility was more consistent with the combined approach than with conventional imaging alone, with an improved overall kappa value of 0.62 versus 0.45 (P < .05). Discordance between these methods was substantial in the grading of class A or B esophagitis. LIMITATIONS: A small sample of class D esophagitis might have produced insufficient statistical power in this category. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and interobserver reproducibilities in grading esophagitis could be improved when NBI was applied with conventional imaging. The benefit appeared to derive from better depictions of small erosive foci.     

Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: A validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists

SUMMARY. The Los Angeles classification system is the most widely employed criteria associated with the greatest interobserver agreement among endoscopists. In Japan, the Los Angeles classification system has been modified (modified LA system) to include minimal changes as a distinct grade of reflux esophagitis, rather than as auxiliary findings. This adds a further grading M defined as minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity. The modified LA system has come to be used widely in Japan. However, there have been few reports to date that have evaluated the interobserver agreement in diagnosis when using the modified LA classification system incorporating these minimal changes as an additional grade. A total of 100 endoscopists from university hospitals and community hospitals, as well as private practices in the Osaka‐Kobe area participated in the study. A total of 30 video clips of 30–40 seconds duration, mostly showing the esophagocardiac junction, were created and shown to 100 endoscopists using a video projector. The participating endoscopists completed a questionnaire regarding their clinical experience and rated the reflux esophagitis as shown in the video clips using the modified LA classification system. Agreement was assessed employing kappa (κ) statistics for multiple raters. The κ‐value for all 91 endoscopists was 0.094, with a standard error of 0.002, indicating poor interobserver agreement. The endoscopists showed the best agreement on diagnosing grade A esophagitis (0.167), and the poorest agreement when diagnosing grade M esophagitis (0.033). The κ‐values for the diagnoses of grades N, M, and A esophagitis on identical video pairs were 0.275–0.315, with a standard error of 0.083–0.091, indicating fair intraobserver reproducibility among the endoscopists. The study results consistently indicate poor agreement regarding diagnoses as well as fair reproducibility of these diagnoses by endoscopists using the modified LA classification system, regardless of age, type of practice, past endoscopic experience, or current workload. However, grade M reflux esophagitis may not necessarily be irrelevant, as it may suggest an early form of reflux disease or an entirely new form of reflux esophagitis. Further research is required to elucidate the pathophysiological basis of minimal change esophagitis.     

Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic oesophageal changes are diagnostically helpful and identify patients exposed to the risk of disease chronicity. However, there is a serious lack of agreement about how to describe and classify the appearance of reflux oesophagitis AIMS: To examine the reliability of criteria that describe the circumferential extent of mucosal breaks and to evaluate the functional and clinical correlates of patients with reflux disease whose oesophagitis was graded according to the Los Angeles system. METHODS: Forty six endoscopists from different countries used a detailed worksheet to evaluate endoscopic video recordings from 22 patients with the full range of severity of reflux oesophagitis. In separate studies, Los Angeles system gradings were correlated with 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring (178 patients), and with clinical trials of omeprazole treatment (277 patients). RESULTS: Evaluation of circumferential extent of oesophagitis by the criterion of whether mucosal breaks extended between the tops of mucosal folds, gave acceptable agreement (mean kappa value 0.4) among observers. This approach is used in the Los Angeles system. An alternative approach of grouping the circumferential extent of mucosal breaks as occupying 0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-99%, or 100% of the oesophageal circumference, gave unacceptably high interobserver variation (mean kappa values 0-0.15) for all but the lowest category of extent (mean kappa value 0.4). Severity of oesophageal acid exposure was significantly (p<0.001) related to the severity grade of oesophagitis. Preteatment oesophagitis grades A-C were related to heartburn severity (p<0.01), outcomes of omeprazole (10 mg daily) treatment (p<0.01), and the risk for symptom relapse off therapy over six months (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results add further support to previous studies for the clinical utility of the Los Angeles system for endoscopic grading of oesophagitis.     

Patients with functional heartburn are more likely to report retrosternal discomfort during wireless pH monitoring

BACKGROUND: Although the wireless Bravo pH system is effective, some patients experience retrosternal sensations possibly caused by esophageal sensitivity that may complicate clinical application. METHODS: Ambulatory pH of 40 consecutive patients with GERD who had erosive esophagitis or nonerosive reflux disease, were monitored for 2 days with the Bravo system. Results were stratified and compared on the basis of self-awareness of the intraesophageal capsule. RESULTS: Pathologic acid reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients and normal reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients. Seventeen patients (42.5%) reported retrosternal discomfort, and 12 of them (70.6%) had normal reflux. Patients with retrosternal discomfort were less likely to have moderate endoscopic esophagitis, i.e., Los Angeles classification grades B, C, and D endoscopic esophagitis (p = 0.006), and were less likely to have significantly elevated esophageal acid exposure (p = 0.0036) than those who did not perceive the discomfort. Reported discomfort was not associated with age, gender, or the presence of endoscopic esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: The negative correlation between Bravo-capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort and esophageal-acid exposure indicates modified mechanical afferent nerve function after long-term acid stimulation. Capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort in the presence of normal acid exposure suggests functional heartburn.     

Interleukin-8 expression in the esophageal mucosa of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that inflammatory cell infiltration can be detected in patients with endoscopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as those with erosive reflux esophagitis. In this study, we examined the expression of mRNA for interleukin (IL)-8, a potent chemokine for neutrophils, in the esophageal mucosa of patients with GERD and compared the results with their endoscopic findings and symptoms. METHODS: Biopsy samples were obtained from 80 patients. Endoscopic diagnosis was performed according to the Los Angeles classification. Patients with typical symptoms such as heartburn despite normal endoscopic findings were classified as the non-erosive GERD group. Total cellular RNA was extracted from the biopsy samples and IL-8 mRNA was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Localization of IL-8 protein in the esophageal mucosa was done by immunostaining. RESULTS: Expression of IL-8 mRNA was correlated with the endoscopic grade of esophagitis or with inflammatory cell infiltration, but not with the symptoms of the patients. Expression of IL-8 mRNA was also detected in all patients with non-erosive GERD. The level of IL-8 expression in non-erosive GERD was low compared with that in erosive GERD, but was higher than that in normal controls. IL-8 immunostaining was found in the basal layers of the esophageal mucosa. Administration of lansoprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, decreased both IL-8 mRNA and protein levels in the esophageal mucosa. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that IL-8 in the esophageal mucosa may be involved in the pathogenesis of esophageal inflammation, including non-erosive GERD.