A phase I study of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic solid tumors

Introduction: This was a dose escalation phase I trial designed to establish the MTD (maximum tolerated dose) and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).Methods: Standard eligibility criteria were required for patients with advanced malignancy to enrol. Gemcitabine was escalated from an initial dose of 800 mg/m². Gemcitabine was administered prior to leucovorin (25 mg/m²) followed by bolus 5-FU (600 mg/m²) every week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest.Results: Of 21 patients enrolled, 20 were eligible for MTD determination. Patients received a median of three 4-week cycles of chemotherapy (range: 1 to 8 cycles). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic or gastroenterologic. Four dose levels were studied. At a gemcitabine dose of 1,500 mg/m² systemic symptoms of fatigue accompanied hematologic toxicity and patients refused further therapy. At 1,250 mg/m², full dose intensity was not delivered during the first cycle in 7 of 8 patients treated. Therefore, 1,000 mg/m² was established as the recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine in this study. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels.Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-FU was tolerable at full doses of all 3 drugs with an expected toxicity profile. Recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m². Initial evidence of clinical activity was seen in a variety of tumor types.     

Second-line treatment with oxaliplatin,leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in gemcitabine-pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase II study

Study objectives: The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin and 5-FU as second line therapy, following relapse to Gemcitabine, in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with Gemcitabine were included in the study. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that was unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic. Treatment consisted of Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m² (2-hour iv infusion), followed by Leucovorin 50 mg/m² (i.v. bolus) and 500 mg/m² 5-FU (1-hour iv infusion), administered weekly, until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Objective tumour response and toxicity were evaluated according to World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria. Results: A total of 30 patients, 20 men and 10 women, median age 63 years (range 52–71 years) and Karnofsky Performance Status (PS) of ≥50 entered the study. The majority of patients (96%) had locally advanced disease. A total of 380 doses of chemotherapy were delivered, a median of 12 doses per patient. Partial responses were observed in 7 patients (PR 23.3%), stable disease in 9 (SD 30.0%), while 14 patients progressed (PD 46.7%). Improved PS was observed in 18 (42.8%) patients. Patients that had responded to first-line Gemcitabine treatment were found more likely to respond or stabilize their disease with second-line treatment. The median duration of response was 22 weeks, and median overall survival was 25 weeks, Grade 3/4 toxicity expressed per chemotherapy dose included leukopenia 16%, anemia 3.2%, thrombocytopenia 3.2%, diarrhea 14.2%, fatigue 16.1% and neurotoxicity 4.2%. Eight patients (27%) suffered a febrile neutropenic event managed successfully with oral antibiotic home therapy, while 17 patients required G-CSF support. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusions: The combination of Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin and 5-FU was tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering encouraging activity as second-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, previously treated with Gemcitabine. Additional studies are warranted with this regimen in Gemcitabine relapsed pancreatic cancer patients. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Gemcitabine plus sorafenib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium

Background Sorafenib, an inhibitor of B-raf, VEGFR2, and PDGFR-β, has activity against pancreatic cancer in preclinical models. In a phase I trial of gemcitabine plus sorafenib, 57% of pancreatic cancer patients achieved stable disease. Patients and methods We conducted a multi-center phase II trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine in chemo-na?ve patients with histologically-confirmed, advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Results Seventeen patients enrolled at 4 centers; 13 were evaluable for response. There were no objective responses; 18% had stable disease. Median overall survival was 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.4, 5.9); median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI: 1.6, 3.6). Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombosis in 18% of patients, dehydration or hand-foot syndrome in 12%, and hypertension or gastrointestinal bleeding in 6%. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus sorafenib is inactive in advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Advances to date and future directions

Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer as most patients present with advanced disease, which precludes locoregional treatment. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. Gemcitabine is the only agent that improves symptoms and confers a modest survival advantage. Many combination therapy regimens have been studied in phase II settings. Eleven randomised phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine-containing regimens with gemcitabine monotherapy since gemcitabine became available clinically. The combination of gemcitabine plus capecitabine has demonstrated a survival advantage over gemcitabine, whereas gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus cisplatin have shown improved progression-free survival or time to tumour progression but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. The search for effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer continues. Gemcitabine in combination with cytotoxic agents or molecular targeted agents hold promise.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic solid tumors

INTRODUCTION: This was a dose escalation phase I trial designed to establish the MTD (maximum tolerated dose) and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Standard eligibility criteria were required for patients with advanced malignancy to enroll. Gemcitabine was escalated from an initial dose of 800 mg/m2. Gemcitabine was administered prior to leucovorin (25 mg/m2) followed by bolus 5-FU (600 mg/m2) every week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled, 20 were eligible for MTD determination. Patients received a median of three 4-week cycles of chemotherapy (range: 1 to 8 cycles). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic or gastroenterologic. Four dose levels were studied. At a gemcitabine dose of 1,500 mg/m2 systemic symptoms of fatigue accompanied hematologic toxicity and patients refused further therapy. At 1,250 mg/m2, full dose intensity was not delivered during the first cycle in 7 of 8 patients treated. Therefore, 1,000 mg/m2 was established as the recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine in this study. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-FU was tolerable at full doses of all 3 drugs with an expected toxicity profile. Recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m2. Initial evidence of clinical activity was seen in a variety of tumor types.     

Gemcitabine combined with 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced carcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is an active agent in pancreatic cancer, showing clinical synergy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (median age, 62 years), with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, were enrolled in the study. The combination of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 and repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: A total of 168 cycles (median 4 cycles per patient) were administered. Partial responses were observed in 6 patients (14.2%) and stable disease in 11 (26.2%). The overall clinical benefit was 40.4%. Symptom relief and improvement of performance status were observed in 18 (42.8%) patients. The median time to progression, median duration of response and the median overall survival, were 6, 7 and 13 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia, anaemia and diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU is an active regimen for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

希罗达加奥沙利铂与5-氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙对中晚期结直肠癌的疗效对比

目的对比希罗达加奥沙利铂(XELOX)与5-氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙(5-FU/LV)对直肠癌患(CRC)的疗效差异。方法88例中晚期CRC患者随机分为XELOX组和5-FU/LV组。XELOX组给口服希罗达加奥沙利铂化疗,5-FU/LV组采用传统5-FU和LV注射化疗。结果组总的有效率66.3%,疾病稳定30.6%、控制率95.9%和无效率均为4.1%,5-FU/LV组分别为41%、23.1%、64.1%和35.9%,两组见差异具有显著性(P<0.05);XELOX组中位疾病进展和中位总体生存时间也明显长于XELOX(P<0.05),但毒性反应也有所增强。结论XELOX方案治疗CRC总体疗效优于5-F/LV方案,但毒性反应较后者明显。     

Leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil,and gemcitabine: A phase I study

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent with efficacy in the treatment of lung, pancreas, bladder and breast cancer. It inhibits DNA synthesis by interfering with cytidine triphosphate production and also inhibits the activity of ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine may potentiate fluorouracil's inhibition of thymidylate synthase. This inhibition would be expected to be sequence dependent, occurring only if gemcitabine were administered following fluorouracil (5FU).The combination of leucovorin, 5-FU, and gemcitabine was assessed in this phase I trial. Eligibility requirements included refractory solid tumor malignancy; adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic reserve; no prior therapy with the combination of leucovorin and 5FU, or with gemcitabine; ECOG performance status 0–2, and signed informed consent.Eleven men and nine women were eligible. The median age was 52.5 years and the median performance status was 1. All but three patients had prior chemotherapy. The starting doses were leucovorin 20 mg/m², 5FU 255 mg/m² and gemcitabine 600 mg/m². 5FU and gemcitabine were escalated in tandem to 340 mg/m² and 800 mg/m² and thereafter to 425 mg/m² and 1000 mg/m², respectively. Gemcitabine administration always followed that of 5FU by 30 minutes. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–32). Two patients at the starting dose had disease progression within the first cycle with one death on day 28. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a partial response and remained on study for 40 months. There were no other responses.The maximum tolerated dose is leucovorin 20 mg/m², 5FU 340 mg/m², and gemcitabine 800 mg/m². The impact of drug sequence remains undetermined.     

Gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a prospective observational study

Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognosis of any malignant disease. Systemic therapy is often administered because the disease is usually detected at advanced stages. Gemcitabine (Gemzar?, Eli Lilly & Co.) has proven activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² was given on days 1, 8 and 15, every 4 weeks. A total of 100 chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were enrolled; 32 and 68% had stage III and IV disease, respectively. The average number of administered cycles was 3.5 (range: 1 – 12). The overall response rate was 13%, with 13 partial responders. The median time to progression was 13.5 weeks (range: 3 – 56; 95% CI = 12 – 14). The median survival was 32 weeks (range: 4 – 104; 95% CI = 27 – 36). Clinical benefit response was acheived for 26 patients (26%). Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities occurred infrequently (anaemia: 5%; neutropenia: 8% and thrombocytopenia: 3% of patients). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities were not observed. There were no treatment-related deaths. Gemcitabine treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer is effective and well-tolerated.     

替吉奥联合吉西他滨与单药吉西他滨治疗进展期胰腺癌的疗效比较

目的 评价吉西他滨单药以及与替吉奥联合治疗局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌的有效率、临床受益反应（评价指标包括患者的疼痛强度、止痛药物消耗量、体力状况评分和体重变化）、生存时间和不良反应。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月至2011年10月收治的62例晚期胰腺癌患者,分为吉西他滨单药组（30例）和吉西他滨＋替吉奥联合组（32例）。单药组：吉西他滨1 000 mg·m-2、第1,8天,静脉滴注30 min,每3周重复。联合组：吉西他滨用法同单药组,替吉奥口服2次·d-1,第1~14天,每3周重复。结果 62例患者均可评价客观疗效,可评价临床受益反应者56例（单药组27例,联合组29例）。单药组和联合组有效率分别为23.3％和31.3％（P〈0.05）,临床受益率分别为59.2%和72.4%（P〉0.05）。2组6个月生存率分别为60.0%和68.7%（P〉0.05）,1年生存率分别为26.6%和31.2%（P〉0.05）。中位无疾病进展时间（PFS）分别为3.9个月和5.4个月（P〈0.05）,中位总生存时间分别为7.8个月和9.1个月（P〉0.05）。2组不良反应比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论 吉西他滨联合替吉奥与单药吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌安全有效,前者有效率优于后者。在延长生存期方面也显示出一定的优势,但该差异无统计学意义。     

A phase II trial of gefitinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was designed as a multicentre phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in association with capecitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Research design and methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with oral gefitinib (250?mg daily) plus oral capecitabine (1000?mg/m² twice a day on Days 1–14) and intravenous oxaliplatin (120?mg/m² on Day 1 of each 3?week cycle).

Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 3 (8.6%) patients experienced a complete response (CR), 14 (40%) a partial response (PR) and 11 (31.4%) had stable disease (SD). The disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 80%, the median time to progression was 7.3 months (95%CI: 4.76–9.2) and the estimated median overall survival was 21.9 months (95% CI: 15.1–not reached). The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities included diarrhoea (31%) and vomiting (5.7%).

Conclusions: The combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin and gefitinib appears to have promising activity in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer. A higher disease control rate and an increase in median overall survival were seen compared with previous reports with capecitabine and oxaliplatin in similar patient populations. The tolerability profile appears to be predictable and similar to capecitabine/oxaliplatin regimens.     

Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors: A phase-I-study

Summary Background: Gemcitabine is a pro-drug that has to be phosphorylated to gemcitabine-triphosphate in order to exhibit its antineoplastic activity. This reaction involves the enzyme deoxycytidine kinase which is saturated at plasma concentrations following standard 30-min infusions. Pharmacological studies indicate that prolonged administration of gemcitabine might result in higher intracellular concentrations of active metabolites. This phase I trial was therefore initiated to determine the optimal dose of gemcitabine administered over 4h in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with gemcitabine as 4h-infusion on day 1, 8 and 15 in 4 week intervals. The starting dose was 350 mg/m². Doses were escalated in 50 mg/m² increments.Results: Twenty-one patients were treated at doses ranging from 350 to 450 mg/m². The maximum tolerated dose was 400 mg/m² with neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis and elevation of liver enzymes being dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Hematologic and nonhematological toxicities were generally mild to moderate. Most common side effects were myelosuppression, nausea, elevation of liver enzymes and asthenia. Objective responses were noted in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangio-carcinoma.Conclusion: In this phase I study of gemcitabine as 4h-infusion, DLTs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis and elevation of liver enzymes. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 400 mg/m².     

Development of nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI,MM-398, PEP02) in the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Introduction: Systemic chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The introductions of FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine combinations have improved the first-line treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic PDAC; while second-line therapy options are limited. Based on the results of pivotal NAPOLI-1 study, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) became the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved regimen for patients with metastatic PDAC with previous gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in November 2015.

Areas covered: We reviewed and summarized the rationale, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic efficacy and adverse events of nal-IRI alone or combined with 5-FU/LV for metastatic PDAC with previous gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Expert opinion: In the NAPOLI study, nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV significantly improved the overall survival, progression-free survival and objective response rate compared to 5-FU/LV alone. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV treatment was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and comparable outcomes in patients with negative demographic characteristics. The relatively sparse of neurotoxicity makes nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV as a more favorable option than oxaliplatin-containing regimens and the current recommended standard treatment for patients with metastatic PDAC after frontline nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine treatment. The front-line therapeutic role of nal-IRI is currently under investigation.     

Treatment outcome of docetaxel,capecitabine and cisplatin regimen for patients with refractory and relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinoma who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy

Objective: Although cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil is a common first-line regimen for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), there are no standard regimens for refractory or relapsed patients. A study of DXD regimen [cisplatin (D), capecitabine (X) and docetaxel (D)] was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity for patients with refractory or relapsed NPC.

Methods: The regimen was administered as follows: 50 mg/m² docetaxel and 50 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 and 800 mg/m² capecitabine on days 1 – 14, repeated every 3 – 4 weeks.

Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. The overall response and complete remission rate was 46.4 and 21.4%. Median follow-up was 24 months; median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 14.0 and 8.0 months. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 14.8 and 13.3%, respectively. Four patients achieved long-term tumor-free survival (range, 53.8 – 125.3 months). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Epstein–Barr virus DNA status (p = 0.003) and therapeutic effect (p < 0.001) were significant independent factors for OS and PFS. The main grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (26.6%), anemia (13.3%) and thrombocytopenia (10.0%). There were no chemotherapy-related deaths.

Conclusion: The DXD regimen appeared to be effective and well tolerated by patients with refractory or relapsed NPC. Further investigation is warranted.     

Incidence and relative risk of grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea in patients treated with capecitabine or 5- fluorouracil: a meta-analysis of published trials

Aim

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that can effectively replace infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of colorectal, gastric and breast cancer. This study aims to analyze the incidence and the relative risk of grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea in patients treated with capecitabine or 5-FU in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods

MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were reviewed for RCTs that compared capecitabine with 5-FU for treatment of solid malignancies. The incidence and relative risk (RR) of grade 3/4 diarrhoea were estimated for each arm in the overall population and in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

Results

Twenty-three studies and 15 761 patients were included. Among these 8303 and 7458 patients received capecitabine or 5-FU based therapies, respectively. In the overall populations severe diarrhoea was reported in 16.6% (95% CI 15.8, 17.4) and in 12.7% (95% CI 11.9, 13.4) of patients treated with capecitabine or 5-FU-based therapies, respectively. The RR was 1.39 (95% CI 1.14, 1.69, P = 0.0010). In 14 899 CRC patients, the incidence of severe diarrhoea was 17.0% (95% CI 16.2, 17.9) and 12.9% (95% CI 12.1, 13.7), respectively, with a RR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.18, 1.81, P < 0.0001). In CRC patients treated with combined chemotherapy, the RR was 1.40 (95% CI 1.07, 1.82; P = 0.01) for patients receiving oxaliplatin and 2.35 (95% CI 1.76, 3.13; P < 0.0001) for patients receiving irinotecan.

Conclusions

Treatment with capecitabine is characterized by an increased risk of severe diarrhoea, mainly in patients affected by CRC and treated with polichemotherapy. Combination treatment with irinotecan doubles the risk over 5-FU.     

Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Summary   Purpose: This phase I trial assessed the safety and the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine given for 10 days prior to a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. It also evaluated the changes in cisplatin DNA adducts induced by capecitabine. Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors who had not failed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) analogs or topoisomerase I inhibitors were eligible. All cohorts of patients first received a 28-day cycle of cisplatin and irinotecan. Both drugs were given at a dose of 50 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, followed by irinotecan on days 8 and 15 at the same dose. The first cycle served as an internal control. Starting from the second cycle, patients received increasing doses per cohort of capecitabine from day 1 to 10 of each cycle, followed by cisplatin on day 11 and irinotecan on days 11, 18 and 25, both at same doses as the first cycle. Cycles were repeated every 38 days. The starting dose of capecitabine was 500 mg/m²/day which was escalated by 250 mg/m²/day in the subsequent cohort of patients to reach the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Later, additional patients were treated at the MTD of capecitabine to further evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and tumor response. Patients blood was tested for cisplatin-DNA adducts to determine the impact of capecitabine on cisplatin-based therapy. Results: Fifteen patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment. At 1,250 mg/m², two DLT of prolonged neutropenia of grade ≥3 were observed. The MTD for capecitabine was thus determined to be 1000 mg/m²/day. Fatigue and diarrhea of grade 1 or 2 were the most frequent toxicities at this dose level. No significant hematologic toxicity was observed at the MTD. Two complete and three partial remissions were observed. Four of the responders had received a platinum agent and/or 5-FU in the past. Conclusions: A sequential treatment with capecitabine followed by cisplatin and irinotecan is well tolerated and demonstrates clinical activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The influence of capecitabine, if any, on the efficacy of the cisplatin-irinotecan combination is not related to a variation in cisplatin-DNA adducts. Previous presentations: C. F. Verschraegen, F. C. Lee, I. Rabinowitz, A. Mangalik, C. Jennings, A. Maestas, Z. Shen. Phase I and translational study of capecitabine, cisplatin, and irinotecan in patients with solid tumors. Proc ASCO, A2114, 2004 H. Sayar, C. Verschraegen, H. Smith, I. Rabinowitz, F. C. Lee, Z. Shen. Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Proc ASCO, AB-31962, 2008 Support: Supported by the Oxnard Foundation; Period of Support: 07/01/2003–06/30/2005     

Capecitabine: an evidence-based review of its effectiveness in the treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas

Introduction:

More than 90% of patients with pancreatic cancer present either with incurable locally advanced or metastatic disease or relapse following surgery. For these patients systemic therapy offers the only prospect of salvage, but pancreatic cancer is one of the most chemoresistant of tumors; current chemotherapy can only delay progression in a limited proportion of patients and survival rates are poor. There is therefore a pressing need for more effective therapy. Capecitabine is a new oral prodrug of fluorouracil, which has shown activity in pancreatic cancer particularly when used in combination with gemcitabine.

Aims:

To review the emerging evidence for the clinical effectiveness of capecitabine in the management of carcinoma of the pancreas.

Evidence review:

There is evidence from phase II testing that capecitabine is active in pancreatic cancer. The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research/Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (SAKK/CECOG) phase III trial found that the combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine did not improve overall median survival as compared with gemcitabine alone (8.4 vs 7.3 months, respectively; P=0.314) but subgroup analysis in patients with good performance score [Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) ≥90] revealed a significant survival improvement with the combination arm (10.1 months) compared with single-agent gemcitabine (7.5 months; P=0.033). Preliminary data from the GemCap phase III trial indicated significantly improved response rates and survival for the combination of gemcitabine with capecitabine (7.4 months) compared with gemcitabine alone (6 months; P=0.026) but analysis of the mature data with adequate follow-up awaits reporting.

Clinical potential:

The addition of capecitabine to gemcitabine may represent a small step forward in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer but further data are required in order to determine its full impact.     

Phase I study of eniluracil,oral 5-fluororacil and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancy

Purpose: The objectives of this trial wereto assess the maximal tolerated dose andtoxicity of the combination of oraleniluracil and 5-fluorouracil andintravenous gemcitabine. Patients and methods: Patients withhistologically confirmed, incurablemalignancy (solid tumor or lymphoma)refractory to standard therapy or for whichno standard therapy exists were enrolled. The treatment plan consisted of weeklygemcitabine for three weeks with twicedaily dosing of 5-FU and eniluracil for 21days beginning on day one of gemcitabine. Cycles repeated on an every four weekschedule. The initial cohort receivedgemcitabine 800 mg/m², oral 5-FU 0.6 mg/m²and eniluracil 6.0 mg/m². Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Eight patients received less than 2 cyclesof therapy. Hematologic andgastrointestinal toxicity predominated,with 48% of courses resulted in grade oneor two neutropenia. Hematologic toxicitywas dose limiting. One treatment relateddeath occurred. Conclusions: The combination of eniluracil,5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine offers anoral alternative for 5-FU administration.The recommended phase II dose isgemcitabine 1000 mg/m², 5FU 1.2 mg/m² andeniluracil 12 mg/m².     

Safety of capecitabine: a review

Importance of the field: Fluoropyrimidines, in particular 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have been the mainstay of treatment for several solid tumors, including colorectal, breast and head and neck cancers, for > 40 years.

Areas covered in this review: This article reviews the pharmacology and efficacy of capecitabine with a special emphasis on its safety.

What the reader will gain: The reader will gain better insight into the safety of capecitabine in special populations such as patients with advanced age, renal and kidney disease. We also explore different dosing and schedules of capecitabine administration.

Take home message: Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-FU and was developed to fulfill the need for a more convenient therapy and provide an improved safety/efficacy profile. It has shown promising results alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal, breast, pancreaticobiliary, gastric, renal cell and head and neck cancers. The most commonly reported toxic effects of capecitabine are diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and hand–foot syndrome. Capecitabine has a well-established safety profile and can be given safely to patients with advanced age, hepatic and renal dysfunctions.     

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium: results of a phase II and pharmacologic study

Our objective was to determine the response to gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced urothelial transitional cell carcinoma in a phase II trial, and gemcitabine distribution between plasma and erythrocytes, following docetaxel administration. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma, following a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen, were given gemcitabine 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 85 mg/m on day 8, every 21 days. Gemcitabine was measured in the plasma and erythrocytes of nine patients before and after docetaxel administration. Thirty-four patients (median 63 years; range 49-79 years), of whom seven had prior chemotherapy and 27 were chemotherapy-naive, received a median of six cycles (range 1-6). Complete and partial remissions were observed in two and 16 (including three pretreated) patients, respectively, for an overall response rate of 53%. Median response duration was 5 months (range 1-39+). Haematoxicity was manageable, despite grade 3 infections in 24% of patients, but other toxicities were mostly mild. An apparent shift of gemcitabine from plasma to erythrocytes occurred after docetaxel in five of six patients evaluable for this analysis. We conclude gemcitabine plus docetaxel is tolerable and highly active in treated and untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma.