Albiglutide: a new GLP-1 analog for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Importance of the field: Despite the wide array of treatments available, a significant number of patients with type 2 diabetes continue to remain uncontrolled. The discovery of the incretin hormones and their role in glucose homeostasis has brought about a new class of medications called the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs. This new class of medications provides the benefits of weight loss as well as a lack of hypoglycemia. However, the currently available agents require once or twice daily injections.

Areas covered in this review: Relevant literature will be discussed on albiglutide, a new GLP-1 analog in Phase III clinical trials. Several clinical trials examining the use of albiglutide as combination therapy are currently ongoing.

What the reader will gain: To date, results of clinical trials suggest that albiglutide may provide a more attractive dosing profile compared with the currently available GLP-1 analogs.

Take home message: The results of ongoing trials will help define the role of albiglutide in treating patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Unresolved bereavement

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and comorbidities related to overweight/obesity are risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In addition to insulin resistance and progressive β-cell failure as key factors in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, defects in the incretin system are now known to contribute as well. Lifestyle modifications including diet and exercise are often insufficient for reducing glucose and weight, and most patients with type 2 diabetes will require pharmacotherapy to treat their hyperglycemia. Goals of therapy should be to reduce blood glucose to as low as possible, for as long as possible, without weight gain and hypoglycemia, and correcting cardiovascular risk factors. Numerous antidiabetes medications lower blood glucose; however, many are associated with weight gain and do not address risk factors present for CVD. Newer pharmacotherapies include the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and amylinomimetics. The GLP-1 receptor agonists and amylinomimetics reduce glucose while promoting weight loss and improving other cardiovascular risk factors with a low incidence of hypoglycemia. The DPP-4 inhibitors effectively lower glucose and are weight neutral.     

GLP-1 gene delivery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a potent insulinotrophic hormone, which makes GLP-1 an attractive candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, the short plasma half-life of the active forms of GLP-1 poses an obstacle to the sustained delivery of this peptide. In this study, we evaluated the effect of GLP-1 gene delivery both in vitro and in vivo using a new plasmid constructed with a modified GLP-1 (7-37) cDNA. This cDNA contains a furin cleavage site between the start codon and the GLP-1 coding region. The expression of the GLP-1 gene was driven by a chicken β-actin promoter (pβGLP1). The level of the GLP-1 mRNA was evaluated by RT-PCR 24 h after transfection. The in vitro results showed a dose-dependent expression of GLP-1. Coculture assay of the GLP-1 plasmid-transfected cells with isolated rat islet cells demonstrated that GLP-1 increased insulin secretion by twofold, compared to controls during a hyperglycemic challenge. A single injection of polyethyleneimine/pβGLP1 complex into ZDF rats resulted in increasing insulin secretion and decreasing blood glucose level that was maintained for 2 weeks. This GLP-1 gene delivery system may provide an effective and safe treatment modality for type 2 diabetes.     

Liraglutide for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing. Management of this condition and minimizing the cardiovascular risks associated with it poses a significant burden on healthcare resources across the world. Currently available therapeutic agents are effective in glycemic management; however, the majority of these are associated with undesirable effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies have been introduced over the last few years and are associated with less risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain.

Areas covered: This review includes current challenges in the management of T2DM, and an overview of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies, in particular the results of Phase III clinical studies of recently approved liraglutide. Apart from glycemic control, multifactorial interventions are needed to minimize the cardiovascular risks associated with T2DM. Liraglutide is effective in improving glycemic control measured by HbA1c and it is also shown to improve weight. Recently, the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK has approved liraglutide 1.2 mg dose in dual and triple therapy for T2DM.

Expert opinion: Liraglutide, a once-daily GLP-1 analog, has a definite role in selected patients with T2DM and the long-term cardiovascular safety is currently being ascertained in ongoing trials.     

Combination therapy with SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists as complementary agents that address multi-organ defects in type 2 diabetes

ABSTRACT

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has a complex pathophysiology composed of multiple underlying defects that lead to impaired glucose homeostasis and the development of macrovascular and microvascular complications. Of the currently available glucose-lowering therapies, sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) both provide effective glycemic control and have been shown to reduce cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with T2D and a high CV risk or established CV disease. Because these agents have complementary mechanisms of action, they are able to act on multiple defects of T2D when used in combination. This review discusses the rationale for and potential benefits of SGLT-2i plus GLP-1RA combination therapy in patients with T2D. A search of the PubMed database was conducted for studies and reviews describing the combined use of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs, with a specific focus on identifying clinical studies of combination therapy in patients with T2D. In clinical studies, glycated hemoglobin (A1c) was significantly reduced over 28–52 weeks with SGLT-2i plus GLP-1RA therapy versus the individual agents or baseline. Several CV risk factors, including body weight, blood pressure, and lipid parameters, were also improved. SGLT-2i plus GLP-1RA therapy was generally well tolerated, with a low risk of hypoglycemia and no unexpected findings. Taken together with results from large CV outcomes trials of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs, combination therapy with these agents potentially provides effective durable glycemic control and CV benefits due to their complementary actions on the defects of T2D.     

Safety and efficacy of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist added to basal insulin therapy versus basal insulin with or without a rapid-acting insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a meta-analysis

Objective: To consolidate the evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) as add-on to basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.

Research design and methods: We searched the EMBASE® and NCBI PubMed (Medline) databases and relevant congress abstracts for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs as add-on to basal insulin compared with basal insulin with or without rapid-acting insulin (RAI) through 23 May 2016. The pooled data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model. A subanalysis was performed for trials investigating basal insulin plus GLP-1 RAs versus basal insulin plus RAI.

Results: Of the 2617 retrieved records, 19 randomized controlled trials enrolling 7,053 patients with T2D were included. Compared with basal insulin ± RAI, reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (difference in means: –0.48% [95% confidence interval (CI), –0.67 to –0.30]; p < 0.0001) and weight loss (–2.60 kg [95% CI, –3.32 to –1.89]; p < 0.0001) were significantly greater with basal insulin plus GLP-1 RA. The subanalysis similarly showed significant results for change in HbA1c from baseline and for weight loss, as well as a significantly lower risk of symptomatic hypoglycemia in patients treated with basal insulin plus GLP-1 RA versus basal insulin plus RAI (odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.64]; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Addition of GLP-1 RA to basal insulin provided improved glycemic control, led to weight reduction and similar hypoglycemia rates versus an intensified insulin strategy; however, symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower when compared with a basal insulin plus RAI.     

Raising the bar in research ethics

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity share a pathogenic relationship, and both have rapidly increased in prevalence over the past decade. This review evaluates the effects of antidiabetes therapies on weight and glycemic control in the type 2 diabetes mellitus population. A PubMed search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that reported the weight effects of antidiabetes treatments. The search focused on the newer in cretin-based therapies, including dipeptidy1 peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists. Antiobesity drugs and treatment options potentially available to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, including bariatric surgery, were also examined. Most of the established antidiabetes therapies (eg, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones) promote weight gain, thereby exacerbating insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. Dipeptidy1 peptidase-4 inhibitors exhibit a weight-neutral profile, however, and GLP-1 receptor agonists (eg, exenatide, liraglutide) have achieved significant body weight reductions in spite of improved glycemic control, which is often accompanied by weight gain. Antiobesity drugs, such as or listat and sibutramine, are effective weight-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but safety and tolerability concerns may limit their use. Bariatric surgery in obese patients is associated with improved glycemic values and decreased mortality. Clinical evidence substantiating the weight-neutral effects of DPP-4 inhibitors and the weight-loss effects of GLP-1 agonists is promising, offering an expansion of therapeutic options for overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Evidence on the clinical utility of antiobesity drugs is more equivocal, and more data are needed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of these agents.     

Postprandial plasma glucose effects of once-weekly albiglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) vary in their structure, duration of action, efficacy, and safety. In order to optimize glycemic control, it is important to target both fasting (FPG) and postprandial plasma (PPG) glucose. Although phase 3 trials document the effect of GLP-1 RAs on glycated hemoglobin, few data are available to assess their effect on PPG. Albiglutide is a once-weekly GLP-1 RA with a half-life of ≈ 5 days. The goal of this review is to summarize the effects of albiglutide on PPG in four phase 2 trials and to describe the PPG-lowering effects of the GLP-1 RAs. At clinically relevant doses (30-64 mg), albiglutide consistently lowered PPG after each meal in addition to its effect on lowering FPG. Multiple weekly subcutaneous injections of albiglutide led to improvements in a variety of glycemic measures, including maximal reductions in PPG from baseline, postmeal glucose excursions, and FPG. Albiglutide, a longer-acting GLP-1 RAs, provides reductions in FPG, PPG following meals, and glucose over 24 hours.     

Current treatments and strategies for type 2 diabetes: Can we do better with GLP-1 receptor agonists?

Abstract

Diet, lifestyle modification, and pharmacotherapy with metformin are appropriate initial treatments for many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, most individuals do not maintain glycemic control with metformin alone. Addition of other oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs), including sulfonylurea, meglitinide, or thiazolidinedione, is often the next step. Newer options, including incretin-based glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, offer important benefits as monotherapies or in combination with OADs, with low risk for hypoglycemia. Reductions in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) have been reported among patients treated with GLP-1 RAs (exenatide, ?0.8 to ?1.1%; liraglutide, ?0.8 to ?1.6%), as has weight loss (exenatide, ?1.6 to ?3.1 kg; liraglutide, ?1.6 to ?3.2 kg). GLP-1 RAs also stimulate β-cell responses and have positive effects on cardiovascular risk factors often present in patients with T2DM. The most common adverse events associated with GLP-1 RAs are nausea, which diminishes over time, and hypoglycemia (when used in combination with a sulfonylurea). A large number of trials demonstrated benefits of GLP-1 RAs, suggesting they could provide suitable treatment options for patients with T2DM.     

Immunomodulation with heat shock protein DiaPep277 to preserve beta cell function in type 1 diabetes – an update

Importance of the field: Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease in which pancreatic beta cells are selectively destroyed. Ultimately hyperglycemia develops and insulin substitution becomes necessary. Immunomodulation aims at arresting this autoimmune attack. DiaPep277, the major T-cell epitope of heat shock protein 60 (hsp60), has been shown to be effective as a modulator of the immune system in type 1 diabetes and is the focus of this review.

Areas covered in this review: A literature search of Pubmed listed publications covering 1990 – 2009 and a website search of the licensing company were performed.

What the reader will gain: DiaPep277 has been successfully employed in animal models and has been investigated in Phase I – III studies in humans. A combined analysis of the Phase II trials showed a significant preservation of beta cell function in adults without adverse effects, but HbA1c was not changed. A Phase III clinical trial is ongoing, and a second Phase III trial will start in early 2010. Addressing the underlying autoimmune process is the call of the future in type 1 diabetes.

Take home message: Use of Diapep277 is a promising therapeutic strategy currently being tested in Phase III trials.     

Albiglutide: a unique GLP-1 receptor agonist

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Albiglutide is a long acting GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) administered by weekly injection.

Area covered: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of albiglutide and its clinical effects are discussed. The review encompassed a search of PubMed and a thorough analysis of the European Union and US Food and Drug Administration approval documents.

Expert opinion: Albiglutide has a chemical structure quite distinct from that of other marketed GLP-1 RAs. The agent has less gastrointestinal side effects than other comparable GLP-1 RAs and is safe in patients with renal failure. As a sole treatment for diabetes and used with other hypoglycemic agents, it achieves a lowering of HbA1c of up to 1%, less than several competitor GLP-1 RAs. The benefit on weight reduction is minimal compared to other GLP-1 RAs. There exists concern about an imbalance of pancreatitis cases in the approval program as well as injection site reactions which led to discontinuance of therapy in up to 2% of participants. A large long term study now underway will determine if albiglutide, with its lower level of GI intolerance, has a place in the treatment of patients with increased risk of cardiovascular events.     

Clarifying the role of incretin-based therapies in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

BackgroundGlucose homeostasis is the result of a complex interaction of a spectrum of hormones, including insulin, glucagon, amylin, and the incretins. Incretins are released by enteroendocrine cells in the intestine in response to a meal. Incretin dysfunction, along with a number of other defects, has been implicated in contributing to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therapies that restore incretin activity may reduce the pathophysiologic consequences of diabetes.ObjectivesThe aim of this article was to review incretin physiology and studies of incretin therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors that were developed to specifically address the blunted incretin response in patients with T2DM.MethodsRelevant English-language publications between 1995 and 2010 were identified through a search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using the search terms incretin, type 2 diabetes mellitus, GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and DPP-4. Review articles and preclinical and clinical trials that described relevant details of the epidemiology of diabetes and incretin physiology in health and in T2DM were selected for review and inclusion. Clinical trials were used to describe the clinical efficacy and safety of the GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with T2DM. An occasional systematic review article and/or meta-analysis summarizing numerous clinical trials of a particular agent was selected for summarizing key data.ResultsPharmacologic modulation of incretin pathophysiology by GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved glycemic control, benefited β-cell function, improved dyslipidemia, and lowered the risk of hypoglycemia compared with insulin and sulfonylureas. Unlike the DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy also produced weight loss, an important consideration given the close association among T2DM, overweight/obesity, and cardiovascular disease. The most common adverse events with GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy included nausea (28%–44%), vomiting (13%–17%), and diarrhea (11%–17%), which generally reduced in incidence and severity with continued therapy. The tolerability profile of the DPP-4 inhibitors was very good, with the incidence of adverse events similar to that of placebo. There was a suggestion of an increased incidence of nasopharyngitis versus placebo (5%–6% vs 3%–4%) with sitagliptin and urinary tract infection (6.8% vs 6.1% with placebo) and headache with saxagliptin (6.5% vs 5.9% with placebo).ConclusionThe 2 incretin drug classes provided effective and consistent glycemic control with a good tolerability profile. These agents might also improve long-term β-cell function and either reduce body weight or be weight neutral. Their role in the therapeutic armamentarium of T2DM is evolving as their potential strengths and weaknesses become better defined.     

Hormone-based therapies in the regulation of fuel metabolism and body weight

Background: The integrated central actions of hormones secreted from pancreatic islets, the gut and adipocytes regulate both energy homeostasis and body weight. Dysregulation in these neurohormonal pathways probably contributes to pathogenesis of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Objective: To examine hormone-based therapies targeting these interrelated pathways as potential treatments for obesity and diabetes. Methods: Preclinical and clinical data on therapies based on hormones secreted from the pancreas (glucagon, insulin, amylin and pancreatic polypeptide), gut (glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, cholecystokinin and peptide YY) and adipose tissue (leptin and adiponectin) as potential treatments for diabetes and obesity are reviewed. Results/conclusions: In diabetes, hormone-based treatments have translated into new clinical platforms including insulin analogs, the GLP-1-like peptide receptor agonist exenatide and amylinomimetic pramlintide, which due to their complex interplay and the progressive nature of diabetes, can be utilized in different settings. Various peptide hormones and agonists/antagonists are currently under investigation as new approaches to treatment of obesity and diabetes.     

The Relationship Between Timing of Initiation on a Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist and Glycosylated Hemoglobin Values Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

PurposeThis study examines the relationship between timing of initiation on a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) values.MethodsThe IBM MarketScan databases were used to identify adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who initiated GLP-1 RA therapy and had multiple recorded HbA_1c results. Time to GLP-1 RA initiation was proxied by the number of classes of glucose-lowering agents prescribed in the 2 years before GLP-1 RA initiation, with fewer glucose-lowering agents indicating initiation of a GLP-1 RA earlier in disease progression. Paired t tests examined differences in HbA_1c values from preperiod to 2-year postperiod. Multivariable analyses examined the relationship between time to GLP-1 RA initiation and postperiod HbA_1c values.FindingsInitiation on a GLP-1 RA was associated with a 0.6% reduction in HbA_1c values over 2 years (P < 0.0001). Earliest starts were associated with a 1.3% reduction in HbA_1c levels (P < 0.0001) and the highest likelihood of achieving a postperiod HbA_1c level <7% (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.0–8.1).ImplicationsResults indicate that although initiation on a GLP-1 RA is generally associated with reduced HbA_1c levels, there may be additional clinical benefits associated with earlier initiation of a GLP-1 RA.     

GAD-alum (Diamyd) – a new concept for preservation of residual insulin secretion

Importance of the field: Type 1 diabetes is a common and very serious disease. There has been very active research going on for a long time aiming at preservation of the residual insulin secretion by some kind of intervention to stop the destructive autoimmune process. This review covers a new type of immune intervention using auto-antigen treatment.

Areas covered in this review: Immune interventions in type 1 diabetes have been tried during the last 30 years, this review mentions some of them, but the main topic is the use of the auto-antigen glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) to create tolerance to stop the autoimmune process. The clinical trials have been performed during the last 15 years and are all covered.

What the reader will gain: This review will give the reader a picture of the research behind treatment with GAD as an immune intervention in type 1 diabetes.

Take home message: The key finding so far is that treatment with Diamyd^® has not only been shown to preserve residual beta cell function in type 1 diabetes, but this treatment may be the proof in humans of a new concept of treating and perhaps even preventing autoimmune diseases.     

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a new class of hypoglycemic drugs, including exenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, lixisenatide, and taspoglutide. Insulin glargine is a standard agent used to supplement basal insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Objective: The aim of this study was to review the efficacy and safety profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetic patients who have not achieved treatment goals with oral hypoglycemic agents.Methods: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the database of ongoing trials were searched from inception through April 2010. Additional data were sought from relevant Web sites, the American Diabetes Association, reference lists of included trials and related (systematic) reviews, and industry. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected if they were ≥3 months in duration, compared GLP-1 receptor agonists with insulin glargine in patients with T2DM, and included ≥1 of the following outcomes: mortality, complications of T2DM, glycemie control, weight, lipids, blood pressure, adverse effects, and health-related quality of life. Quasirandomized controlled trials were excluded. The quality of the eligible studies was assessed on the basis of the following aspects: randomization procedure, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data (intent-to-treat [ITT] analysis), selective outcome reporting, and publication bias.Results: A total of 410 citations were retrieved; 5 multicenter RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were identified. They were all open-label designs with an insulin glargine arm, predefined outcomes reported, and ITT analysis. One trial had an unclear randomization procedure and allocation concealment. Publication bias was not able to be determined. No data wete found with regard to mortality or diabetes-associated complications, and few data were found on quality of life. The results of the metaanalysis suggest that insulin glargine was significantly better in reducing the fasting blood glucose (mean difference [MD] [95% CI], 1.31 [1.04 to 1.58]; P < 0.001), but exhibits greater incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia (risk ratio [RR] [95% CI], 0.40 [0.23 to 0.71]; P = 0.002) and influenza (RR [95% CI], 0.56 [0.32 to 0.98]; P = 0.04). GLP-1 receptor agonists are more conducive to reducing weight (MD [95% CI], −3.96 [−5.14 to -2.77]; P < 0.001), postprandial blood glucose (after breakfast, P < 0.001; after dinner, P < 0.001), and LDL-C (MD [95% CI], −0.18 [−0.28 to −0.08]; P < 0.001), but have significantly more gastrointestinal adverse effects (eg, nausea/ vomiting, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between GLP-1 receptor agonists and insulin glargine in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) levels (MD [95% CI], −0.03 [−0.13 to 0.08]) and the overall incidence of hypoglycemia (RR [95% CI], 0.69 [0.42 to 1.14]).Conclusions: Compared with insulin glargine, GLP-1 receptor agonists did not have a significant difference in regard to reducing HbA1c levels and they were significantly associated with decreased weight but increased gastrointestinal adverse events. It remains unclear whether GLP-1 receptor agonists influence mortality or diabetes-associated complications in patients with T2DM. More trials with longer follow-up are needed to determine the exact long-term efficacy and safety profiles of this new class of hypoglycemic drugs.     

Tracheal Fibroxanthoma in a Child

Abstract

Exenatide (exendin-4) is a 39-amino acid peptide belonging to the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist class that has been demonstrated to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exenatide can be injected twice daily (ExBID) before meals or once weekly (ExQW) when encompassed within dissolvable poly-(D,L -lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. The primary difference between these formulations is the plasma concentration of exenatide over time, with the long-acting form providing continuous delivery. Clinical trials have examined the similarities and differences in the efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes of these formulations. In 2 clinical studies spanning 24 and 30 weeks, significant (P < 0.05) reductions from baseline were observed in fasting plasma glucose (ExBID, ?12 and ?25 mg/dL; ExQW, ?35 and ?41 mg/dL), postprandial glucose (ExBID, ?124 mg/dL; ExQW, ?95 mg/dL), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1) (ExBID, ?0.9% and ?1.5%; ExQW, ?1.6% and ?1.9%). Reductions in body weight from baseline were significant and similar with both treatments (ExBID, ?1.4 and ?3.6 kg; ExQW, ?2.3 and ?3.7 kg). Reductions in systolic blood pressure from baseline were observed with both formulations, particularly in patients who were hypertensive at baseline. Beneficial improvements in lipid profiles were small and fluctuated in significance. Patients reported greater treatment satisfaction with ExQW compared with ExBID dosing. Gastrointestinal adverse events were commonly observed with both formulations but were less frequent with ExQW. These events were of mild-to-moderate intensity and rarely led to discontinuation. Real-world data for ExBID demonstrated decreases in HbA_1c, fasting plasma glucose, and body weight that were consistent with clinical trial results. Cases of pancreatitis or renal impairment have been reported in patients treated with ExBID, although no causal relationship with treatment has been shown. This review describes the similarities and differences between exenatide delivered as a twice-daily or as a once-weekly injection to provide a better understanding of the clinical effects and potential clinical uses of each.     

DiaPep277 peptide therapy in the context of other immune intervention trials in type 1 diabetes

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells. The aim of immune intervention is to arrest this autoimmune attack. DiaPep277, a major T-cell epitope of heat shock protein 60 (hsp60), has been shown to be effective in the modulation of the immune response in recent onset T1D and is the main focus of this review in the context of other ongoing trials using different approaches.

Areas covered: The authors performed a literature search of Pubmed listed publications (from the last 10 years) and a website search of the company licensing DiaPep277. DiaPep277 has been investigated in Phase I – III trials in humans. Phase II trials showed a significant preservation of β-cell function in adult T1D patients (but not children) with an absence of adverse effects and not accompanied by lower glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels or reduced daily insulin requirement compared with placebo-treated patients.

Expert opinion: Administration of DiaPep277 is safe and represents a promising therapeutic strategy in patients with recent-onset T1D. The results of two large Phase III trials will tell us whether this therapy may change our current approach to treating T1D patients at diagnosis.