Novel therapeutic approaches to gastric and duodenal ulcers: an update

Over the last 25 years, a remarkable revolution in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers has occurred. Effective therapies were developed not only to heal ulcers, but also to cure most patients. The two principal causes for gastric and duodenal ulcers are either infection with Helicobacter pylori or the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). With H. pylori eradication, gastric and duodenal ulcers are rapidly becoming historical diseases. This communication reviews the salient pharmacology of the novel anti-ulcer drugs currently in development, with particular emphasis on the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Intense research is currently focused on the development of proton pump inhibitors primarily for the treatment and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The older proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole and lansoprazole, are effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers. Furthermore, both drugs are effective in eradicating H. pylori when given with various antibiotics. Pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole are new proton pump inhibitors, which appear to have comparable therapeutic profiles with omeprazole and lansoprazole. Rebamipide is a new mucosal protective drug, which is effective in healing gastric ulcers. Polaprezinc and nocloprost are also mucosal protective drugs, which are in clinical development. However, none of these three cytoprotective drugs have been evaluated for their efficacy in eradicating H. pylori when given in combination with antibiotics. Likewise, no published literature exists on the use of these drugs for preventing NSAID-induced ulcers. With the rapid eradication of H. pylori currently happening in the developed world, the therapeutic challenge is now directed toward preventing NSAID-associated ulcer. Significant reduction of NSAID-induced ulcers is achieved by using continuous prophylactic anti-ulcer therapy (misoprostol or omeprazole) or by using NSAIDs possessing selective COX-2 inhibitory activity. However, outcome clinical studies are needed to compare the adjuvant anti-ulcer therapies given with COX-1 inhibitors versus the selective COX-2 inhibitors given alone.     

Prophylaxis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal disorders.

A significant percentage of patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) experience some type of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, lesions of the gastroduodenal tract being clinically the most relevant. NSAIDs cause gastrointestinal damage by 2 independent mechanisms: a topical effect, which is pH and pKa related, and a systemic effect mediated by cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition with a reduction in prostaglandin synthesis. Using endoscopy, gastroduodenal lesions identified include subepithelial haemorrhages, erosions and ulcers. The prevalence of ulceration in NSAID users has been reported as being between 14 and 31% with a 2-fold higher frequency of gastric ulcers compared with duodenal ulcers. Among the strategies used to decrease the risk of ulcer development are: (i) the use of analgesics other than NSAIDs; (ii) use of the lowest possible dosage of NSAID; (iii) the use of a COX-2 selective NSAID; (iv) the use of low doses of corticosteroids instead of NSAIDs; (v) avoidance of concomitant use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids; and (vi) use of preventive therapy. In an attempt to reduce the incidence of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal lesions, the following approaches have been proposed: (i) use of the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol, which is an antiulcer drug which has been proven to be as effective in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers as in the reduction of serious upper gastrointestinal complications; (ii) histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2 antagonists), e.g. ranitidine, cimetidine and famotidine, which are useful in the prevention of NSAID-induced duodenal ulcers during long term treatment, but not in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers; (iii) proton pump inhibitors, e.g omeprazole, and pantoprazole, whose efficacy in preventing NSAID-associated ulcers has been recently demonstrated; and (iv) barrier agents, e.g. sucralfate, which cannot be recommended as prophylactic agents to prevent NSAID-induced gastropathy. The first step in the treatment of NSAID-associated ulcers lies in a reduction in the dosage of the NSAID or discontinuation of the drug. If NSAID treatment cannot be withdrawn, a proton pump inhibitor appears to be the most effective treatment in healing ulcers, accelerating the slow healing observed with H2 antagonists.     

消化性溃疡的病因和药物治疗

消化性溃疡是我国人群中常见病之一 ,各种因素如幽门螺杆菌感染、药物、遗传及社会心理因素等均可诱发或促进本病的发生。组胺H2 受体拮抗剂如法莫替丁、尼扎替丁等和质子泵抑制剂如奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑等抗酸分泌药物与胃粘膜保护剂如硫糖铝混悬液、胶态次枸椽酸铋等联合应用可有效的治疗消化性溃疡病。应用奥美拉唑、阿莫西林及克拉霉素三联 7d治疗可有效的根治幽门螺杆菌和促进溃疡愈合     

Recent advances in gastric ulcer therapeutics

In developed countries at least, ulcers related to Helicobacter pylori infection are becoming rarer. However, ulcers associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain a major clinical problem, which has not been solved through the introduction of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2. Recent studies suggest that NSAID-induced ulcers can be prevented largely through co-administration of a proton pump inhibitor to block acid secretion in the stomach. In patients requiring aspirin therapy to prevent cardiovascular diseases, co-administration of aspirin plus a proton pump inhibitor was found to be safer than using another anti-platelet therapy that does not block gastric prostaglandin production (e.g. clopidogrel). Several recent papers have clarified further the contribution of COX-2 to gastric mucosal defence and to the healing of ulcers. In some circumstances, COX-2 produces a highly potent gastroprotective substance (15-R-lipoxin A(4)), and analogues of this substance could have therapeutic value for preventing gastric ulceration. Nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs continue to show promise in terms of limiting damage to the gastrointestinal tract, even when given in combination with aspirin. Recent studies support the notion that platelets make a major contribution to ulcer healing, and the release of several key growth factors from platelets appears to be regulated by proteinase-activated receptors.     

COX-2 inhibitors vs. NSAIDs in gastrointestinal damage and prevention

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit production of protective gastric mucosal prostaglandins and also have a direct topical irritant effect. In some patients this results in dyspepsia and development of gastroduodenal erosions and ulceration. The risk of ulcer complications, such as bleeding, perforation and death is increased approximately 4-fold in NSAID users. Patients at high risk of ulcer complications include the elderly, those taking anticoagulants, steroids and aspirin, those with a previous history of peptic ulceration and patients with concomitant serious medical problems. The interaction of NSAIDs with Helicobacter pylori (the major cause of peptic ulceration in non-NSAID users) is controversial and some studies suggest that H. pylori infection may even protect against NSAID-induced ulceration. Selective inhibitors of the inducible cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme spare COX-1 in the gastric mucosa and, hence, do not inhibit production of mucosal prostaglandins. COX-2-selective inhibitors are associated with a significant reduction in gastroduodenal damage compared with traditional NSAIDs. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are probably the best agents for healing and prevention of NSAID-induced ulcers. Preliminary studies suggest that COX-2 selective inhibitors, like traditional NSAIDs, may prevent lower gastrointestinal cancer. Further studies are needed but they may be useful in individuals at high risk of certain types of lower gastrointestinal malignancy with increased gastrointestinal tolerability and safety.     

Should NSAID/low‐dose aspirin takers be tested routinely for H. pylori infection and treated if positive? Implications for primary risk of ulcer and ulcer relapse after initial healing

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can each result in gastric or duodenal ulcer(s) and ulcer complications. Together, H. pylori infection and NSAIDs account for approximately 90% of peptic ulcer disease. In 2003, the results of studies suggest, and guidelines recommend, the careful selection of anti-inflammatory drugs - NSAIDs or selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) based upon patients gastrointestinal history and use of aspirin therapy. Testing for, and cure of, H. pylori infection is recommended in patients prior to the initiation of NSAID therapy and in those who are currently receiving NSAIDs and have a history of dyspepsia, peptic ulcer or ulcer complications. For patients who present with peptic ulcer bleeding but require NSAIDs long-term, H. pylori eradication therapy should be considered, followed by continuous proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis to prevent re-bleeding, regardless of which kind of NSAID (nonselective NSAID /coxib) is being prescribed. Routine testing for, and eradication of, H. pylori infection has not been recommended for current takers of NSAIDs with no or low risk of complications. The management of patients taking low-dose aspirin is complex, but eradication of H. pylori infection alone in those with a past history of bleeding does not guarantee complete protection and therefore a proton pump inhibitor should also be given. The success of eradication therapy should always be confirmed, because of the risk of ulcer recurrence and bleeding in H. pylori-infected patients who require anti-inflammatory treatments.     

Interaction of anti-ulcer drugs with the gastric proton pump

In this review consideration is given to anti-ulcer drugs interaction with the gastric H(+)-K+ ATPase. The review has been divided into three sections. First, properties of the gastric proton pump are described in terms of structure, biological activity and ions transport activity, followed by an account of interactions involving antisecretory agents. Emphasis is given to a new class of drugs (substituted benzimidazole) that shows a unique antisecretory action and is safe and effective for short-term treatment of patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers. The final section briefly examines future directions for the production of more selective inhibitors of the gastric proton pump.     

Management of NSAID/aspirin-induced small intestinal damage by GI-sparing NSAIDs, anti-ulcer drugs and food constituents

Recent advances in endoscopic techniques such as capsule endoscopy have revealed that aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) often cause mucosal lesions not only in the upper gastrointestinal tract, but also in the small intestine in humans. Gastric and duodenal lesions caused by NSAIDs can be treated with anti-secretory agents such as proton pump inhibitors or histamine H2-receptor antagonists; however, these drugs are ineffective in treating NSAID-induced lesions in the small intestine. Furthermore, there are few effective agents for the treatment of small intestinal lesions. Therefore, identification of effective therapies for the treatment of NSAID/aspirin-induced small intestinal lesions remains an urgent priority. In the present review, we focus on novel pharmacological treatments to prevent or reduce NSAID-induced intestinal lesions, i.e., 1) GI-sparing NSAIDs (NO- or H2S-NSAIDs, NSAIDs mixed with phosphatidylcholine); 2) anti-ulcer drugs such as mucosal protective agents (misoprostol, rebamipide, teprenone, etc.) and anti-secretory agents (lansoprazole, etc.); 3) antibiotics (metronidazole) and probiotics (Lactobacillus sp.); and 4) food constituents (lactoferrin and soluble dietary fibers). We surveyed data from clinical trials evaluating these novel treatments. Also reviewed herein were the pros and cons of the novel protective methods from the standpoint of safety, efficacy, convenience, and cost.     

Potent gastric acid inhibition in Helicobacter pylori eradication

At present, antisecretory drugs--foremost among them the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)--represent a keystone in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. The present article shall first compare the role of PPIs as compared with histamine H2 receptor antagonists, both of them in the role of antibiotic-associated antisecretory therapy, and shall then address the contribution of each of the various PPIs that have been developed until the present time to the H. pylori eradication therapies. In summary, it may be concluded that PPIs are more effective overall than H2 receptor antagonists when the two groups of antisecretory drugs are given at the usual standard doses together with antibiotics with the intention of eradicating H. pylori infection. However, all PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, and esomeprazole) are equivalent when given together with two antibiotics to cure the infection.     

Helicobacter pylori and NSAID gastropathy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori are known to share a number of pathogenic mechanisms, but there is no evidence to show a significant synergic action between the two risk factors. Studies assessing this subject have differed in almost every aspect of their methodology, including the definition of a NSAID user as well as the types, doses, duration and their indications for NSAID use. They also differed in their end-points, the definition of dyspepsia and the regimes used for eradication of H. pylori . However, some conclusions may be drawn from the results of clinical trials.
In H. pylori -positive patients without mucosal lesions, NSAIDs may aggravate dyspeptic symptoms but, with the exception of elderly patients, they do not present a definite major risk of gastric and duodenal lesions and, above all, of ulcer-correlated complications.
So what recommendations can be made with regard to H. pylori eradication in patients requiring treatment with NSAIDs? The microorganism and the anti-inflammatory drugs are undoubtely independent causes of gastric and duodenal damage. Patients taking NSAIDs who are found to have gastric or duodenal ulcers should therefore be tested for the bacterium and specifically treated, since H. pylori and NSAID-induced ulcers may be macroscopically indistinguishable.
Whether asymptomatic patients taking NSAIDs should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection is still a matter of debate.     

The rationale of acid suppression in the treatment of acid-related disease.

Acid-related disorders such as gastric and duodenal ulcers and gastro- oesophageal reflux disease have a high prevalence. Traditionally, acid suppression has proved to be the most effective means by which to heal these disorders, but relapse rates are high after cessation of treatment. Recently, Helicobacter pylori infection has been shown to modify several aspects of gastric function. Eradication of H. pylori infection virtually abolishes duodenal ulcer recurrence, implicating this organism in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcers and initiating a whole new strategy in the management of these acid-related disorders. More potent degrees of acid suppression result in faster healing. Moderate acid suppression, as occurs with H2-receptor antagonists, can heal just as many ulcers if treatment is continued for longer. The combination of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics have successfully eradicated H. pylori in duodenal ulcer patients. Both H2-receptor antagonists and the proton pump inhibitors have satisfactory safety profiles. Due to their superiority in symptom relief, and in the healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers and erosive oesophagitis, and due to their ability to eradicate H. pylori infection in combination with antibiotics, the proton pump inhibitors will probably become accepted as first-line therapy for the treatment of acid-related diseases.     

Effects of lansoprazole plus amoxycillin on the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japanese peptic ulcer patients

Aim : The effect of lansoprazole plus amoxycillin on curing Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer recurrence was evaluated.
Method : The study group was composed of 68 patients with gastric ulcers and 51 with duodenal ulcers, all were H. pylori -positive. The participants were assigned at random to the lansoprazole alone group (lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. for 6 or 8 weeks) or the lansoprazole plus amoxycillin group (lansoprazole alone regimen plus amoxycillin at 500 mg q.d.s. concomitantly for the first 2 weeks). Healed patients were not given maintenance treatment with acid secretion inhibitors. The cure rate for H. pylori infection and the ulcer recurrence rate after 1 year were investigated.
Result : The cure rate for H. pylori infection was 4.2% in patients receiving lansoprazole alone and 38.5% in patients receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin ( P < 0.01) for gastric ulcers, and 0% in patients receiving lansoprazole alone and 61.9% in patients receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin ( P <0.001) for duodenal ulcers. The recurrence rate was 42.3% in patients receiving lansoprazole alone and 28.6% in patients receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin for gastric ulcers, and 66.7% for patients receiving lansoprazole alone and 11.1% for patients receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin ( P <0.001) for duodenal ulcers. None of the patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers cured of H. pylori infection had a recurrence.
Conclusion : Concomitant use of lansoprazole and amoxycillin increased the curative effects on H. pylori infection. However, the cure rates with this regimen remained inadequate.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori increases nocturnal intragastric acidity during dosing with rabeprazole,omeprazole, lansoprazole and placebo

BACKGROUND: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori decreases the antisecretory activity of omeprazole and lansoprazole. Rabeprazole is a potent proton pump inhibitor that may not be affected as greatly by H. pylori status. AIM: To compare the effect of H. pylori eradication on intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin during dosing with lansoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole and placebo. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy H. pylori-infected volunteers were studied on day 7 of dosing with placebo, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg, before and at least 5 weeks after H. pylori eradication. On each occasion, the 24-h intragastric acidity was measured by gastric aspiration. Plasma gastrin concentrations were measured hourly from 08.00 to 13.00 h. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects completed the study. For all three drugs and placebo, H. pylori eradication increased intragastric acidity, particularly nocturnal acidity, and decreased plasma gastrin. There were no differences between the three drugs with respect to 24-h acidity, percentage of time pH > 4 or 5-h plasma gastrin, either before or after H. pylori eradication. Before eradication, the percentage nocturnal time at pH > 3 was significantly greater during rabeprazole than during lanso-prazole dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in intragastric acidity seen after H. pylori eradication during dosing with proton pump inhibitors is a drug-class effect, particularly affecting nocturnal acid control. This is related to increased spontaneous intragastric acidity after H. pylori eradication.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between proton pump inhibitors and roxithromycin in volunteers

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy including two antibiotics and a proton pump inhibitor is a rational approach to the treatment of Helicobacter pylori induced peptic ulcer disease. The interaction of antimicrobial therapy and acid suppression is not yet well elucidated. AIMS: To investigate the effects of proton pump inhibitors on roxithromycin levels in plasma and gastric tissue under steady-state conditions in volunteers. METHODS: In two crossover studies omeprazole 20 mg b.d., lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., roxithromycin 300 mg b.d., and the combination of roxithromycin with either omeprazole or lansoprazole were administered to 12 healthy volunteers over 6 days. Blood plasma levels of the drugs were measured. In addition, roxithromycin concentrations were also determined in gastric juice and gastric tissue obtained during endoscopy. RESULTS: The proton pump inhibitors and roxithromycin did not alter the blood plasma pharmacokinetics of each other. When compared to roxithromycin administered alone, its combination with a proton pump inhibitor significantly increased the roxithromycin concentrations in gastric juice (3.0-5.0 microg/mL vs. 0.3-0.4 microg/mL) and gastric tissue (antrum: 3.8-4.0 vs. 2.8 microg/g, fundus: 5.9-7.4 vs. 4.2-4.4 microg/g). CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitors and roxithromycin do not alter the systemic bioavailability of each other. However, proton pump inhibitors increase the local concentration of roxithromycin in the stomach which may contribute to the clinically proven synergic beneficial action in eradication therapy of H. pylori.     

Esomeprazole: a review of its use in the management of acid-related disorders in the US

Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as a single optical isomer. It provides better acid control than current racemic proton pump inhibitors and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole. In large well designed 8-week trials in patients with erosive oesophagitis, esomeprazole recipients achieved significantly higher rates of endoscopically confirmed healed oesophagitis than those receiving omeprazole or lansoprazole. Esomeprazole was effective across all baseline grades of oesophagitis; notably, relative to lansoprazole, as the baseline severity of disease increased, the difference in rates of healed oesophagitis also increased in favour of esomeprazole. In two trials, 94% of patients receiving esomeprazole 40mg once daily achieved healed oesophagitis versus 84 to 87% of omeprazole recipients (20mg once daily). In a study in >5000 patients, respective healed oesophagitis rates with once-daily esomeprazole 40mg or lansoprazole 30mg were 92.6 and 88.8%. Resolution of heartburn was also significantly better with esomeprazole than with these racemic proton pump inhibitors. Long-term (up to 12 months) therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole 20 or 40mg once daily for 4 weeks proved effective in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis. Eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is considered pivotal to successfully managing duodenal ulcer disease. Ten days' triple therapy (esomeprazole 40mg once daily, plus twice-daily amoxicillin 1g and clarithromycin 500mg) eradicated H. pylori in 77 to 78% of patients (intention-to-treat) with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer disease. Esomeprazole is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. The tolerability profile is similar to that of other proton pump inhibitors. Few patients discontinued therapy because of treatment-emergent adverse events (<3% of patients) and very few (<1%) drug-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole is an effective and well tolerated treatment for managing GORD and for eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. In 8-week double-blind trials, esomeprazole effectively healed oesophagitis and resolved symptoms in patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis. Notably, in large (n >1900 patients) double-blind trials, esomeprazole provided significantly better efficacy than omeprazole or lansoprazole in terms of both healing rates and resolution of symptoms. Long-term therapy with esomeprazole effectively maintained healed oesophagitis in these patients. Esomeprazole was also effective in patients with symptomatic GORD. Thus, esomeprazole has emerged as an effective option for first-line therapy in the management of acid-related disorders.     

Review article: the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract injury

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the two major causes of peptic ulcers. This article reviews the interaction of H. pylori and NSAIDs on the development of gastric mucosal histological changes, endoscopically confirmed ulcers, and ulcer complications, and assesses whether underlying H. pylori infection potentiates (or mitigates) the development of NSAID-induced ulcer disease. The weight of evidence does not suggest that H. pylori infection potentiates the risk of ulcer formation or ulcer complications in NSAID users. If such an effect occurs, it is likely to be relatively small. Some data even suggest that H. pylori may be protective against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Limited data raise the possibility that H. pylori infection, however, may potentiate the effect of low-dose aspirin with respect to ulcer bleeding. Both NSAIDs and H. pylori are independent risk factors for ulcer disease. Therefore, in an individual patient with an ulcer, one cannot be certain which factor is responsible for the ulcer, and both risks should be removed if possible.