Fluocinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

Introduction: Fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant is a non-erodible implant approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) insufficiently responsive to available therapies.

Areas covered: The injectable intravitreal implant releases fluocinolone acetonide at an average rate of 0.2 µg/day for at least 36 months. The two pooled pivotal FAME trials showed that, in patients with DME previously treated with laser photocoagulation, fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant was more beneficial than sham injection when looking at the proportion of patients with an improvement from baseline in visual acuity of more than 15 letters at 24 months and at 36 months. Cataract (82%) and intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation (37%) were the most common adverse events. Raised IOP was mostly treated with IOP-lowering medications, with <5% of eyes requiring incisional IOP-lowering surgery. FAME trial program results are confirmed by a series of real-world studies in eyes with chronic/recalcitrant DME.

Expert opinion: data indicate that fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant is a useful second-line option for the treatment of DME.     

Intraocular corticosteroids for posterior segment disease: 2012 update

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME), cystoid macular edema (CME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) and uveitis are responsible for severe visual impairment worldwide. In some patients with these conditions, treatment with intraocular corticosteroids may be beneficial. Although off-label use of these agents has occurred for many years, novel agents including preservative-free and sustained-release intravitreal implants are currently being studied in clinical trials (CTs).

Areas covered: This paper reviews the use of CTs for vitreoretinal (VR) diseases including choroidal neovascularization, CME, DME, RVO and posterior uveitis. It also discusses the use of corticosteroids for treating VR disease, including dexamethasone, fluocinolone acetonide, intravitreal implants and triamcinolone acetonide.

Expert opinion: Used alone, intravitreal corticosteroids may benefit disorders such as DME, RVO and uveitis compared with standard therapy. Cases of exudative AMD non-responsive to standard treatment may benefit from combination therapy, including usage of intravitreal corticosteroid injections. Intraoperative use of these agents may aid visualization of retinal structures. Sustained-release intraocular implants have been approved for posterior uveitis and RVO associated with macular edema. In spite of this, most intraocular corticosteroids have a limited duration of action along with significant side effects, including cataract and glaucoma. Currently, intravitreal corticosteroid usage for DME is considered off-label.     

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant Ozurdex in the treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients not previously treated with any intravitreal drug: a prospective 12-month follow-up study

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the mid-long-term efficacy and safety of the dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant (Ozurdex¹) in naïve patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: Prospective and single-center study conducted on consecutive patients with a diagnosis of DME, who received a DEX implant and were followed up for at least 12?months. The main outcomes measurements were the mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in foveal thickness (FT) as compared to the baseline values.

Results: Of the 84 screened patients 50 were included in the study. The BCVA significantly improved from 52.4 (20.4) letters at baseline to 62.6 (15.6), 61.2 (18.4), 61.6 (18.6), 60.6 (19.0), and 60.6 (18.8) at 2, 4, 6, 12?months and end of follow-up period, respectively (repeated measures ANOVA and the Greenhouse-Geisser correction; p?=?.0008). At the end of the follow-up period, a gain of BCVA of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 letters were observed in 26 (52.0%), 18 (36.0%), and 16 (32.0%) patients, respectively. The mean FT was significantly reduced from 446.0 (139.9) µm at baseline to 327.2 (103.6) at the end of follow-up (repeated measures ANOVA and the Greenhouse-Geisser correction; p?=?.0008). During the study follow-up, the patients receive a mean of 3.4 (2.9–3.9) implants. Of the 32 phakic eyes at baseline, 17 (53.1%) either developed new lens opacity or progression of an existing opacity.

Conclusion: In eyes with DME not previously treated with intravitreal drugs, DEX implants provide meaningful functional and anatomical benefits, and these results are sustained mid–long-term.     

Retinal thickness fluctuations in patients receiving fluocinolone acetonide implant for diabetic macular edema

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate central foveal thickness (CFT) variability and accompanying changes in visual acuity (VA) 12?months before and after treatment with the 190?mcg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: The Iluvien Clinical Evidence cohort study in the United Kingdom (ICE-UK) investigated the effectiveness of the FAc implant in people treated at 13 hospitals from April 2013 to April 2015. The following parameters were calculated for CFT for each patient: mean, standard deviation (SD), retinal thickness amplitude (RTA, the difference between maximum and minimum values), and coefficient of variation (CV).

Results: In 149 eyes with ≥2 CFT observations both before and after FAc implantation, the median VA was 50 ETDRS letters at implantation. Mean CFT was 487?µm at implantation and 135?µm at 12?months post-implant. Before implantation, the mean CV and mean SD for CFT were 24.6% and 112?µm, respectively; the mean RTA was 254?µm. A statistically significant (p?<?.001) decrease in all three parameters was observed after implantation (18.3%, 68.2?μm and 146?μm, respectively). There was an association between CFT change between extremes and the corresponding change in VA (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = ?0.292, p?<?.001, prior to the implant; r = ?0.379, p?<?.001, post-implant).

Conclusions: After accounting for the reduction in CFT, retinal thickness stabilized following FAc implantation. There might be VA benefits in reducing variability in CFT over time. This merits further exploration but would require more frequent CFT observations in order to properly determine patterns of retinal thickness variability.     

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness in routine practice of fluocinolone acetonide 190 µg intravitreal implant in people with diabetic macular edema

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the Iluvien Clinical Evidence study in the UK (ICE-UK) was to assess the real-world effectiveness of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) 190?µg intravitreal implant for the treatment of clinically significant chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This retrospective study collected data from patient medical records in 13 ophthalmology centers for people with DME prescribed FAc intravitreal implant between April 1, 2013 and April 15, 2015. Visual acuity (VA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were collected for 12 months prior to and after implant.

Results: Two hundred and eight people, contributing 233 eyes, treated with FAc implant were included. Mean age was 68.1 years and 62% were male. In the 12 months prior to FAc implant, VA declined. Median (interquartile range, IQR) VA was 0.66 (0.48–1.00) LogMAR units (equivalent to 52.0 ETDRS letters) at implant, improving to 0.60 (0.38–0.90) LogMAR units (55.0 letters) at 12 months post-implant (p?<?0.001). In total, 44%, 30%, and 18% of people achieved an improvement in ETDRS score of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 letters, respectively, over the same period. A small but significant (p?<?.001) increase in median IOP was observed (median?=?15.0, IQR?=?13.0–18.0?mmHg at implant to 18.0, 15.0–21.0?mmHg at 12 months). In the 12 months following implant, additional IOP-lowering therapy was prescribed in 15% of subjects previously not requiring such therapy.

Conclusion: Following FAc implant, an overall significant improvement in VA was observed over a period of 12 months, accompanied by a significant but small increase in IOP.     

Patterns of retinal thickness prior to and following treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 190 µg intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema

Abstract

Objectives: To compare retinal thickness before and after treatment with the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) 190 µg intravitreal implant in people with diabetic macular edema (DME) using data from the Iluvien Clinical Evidence study in the UK (ICE-UK).

Methods: For this retrospective cohort study, data on people attending any one of 13 participating ophthalmology departments and treated with FAc intravitreal implant between April 1, 2013 and April 15, 2015 were collected for 12 months prior to and at least 12 months after implantation. Cross-sectional and longitudinal patterns of central foveal thickness (CFT) were compared before and after FAc implant.

Results: There were 208 people who contributed data from 233 individual eyes treated with the FAc implant. Mean age was 68.1 years and 62% were male. Median (interquartile range) CFT decreased from 462 µm (354–603 µm) at time of implant to 309 µm (222–433 µm) at 12 months post-implant (p?<?.001). Over the same period, a reduction of ≥10%, ≥25%, and ≥50% in CFT was observed in 113 (65%), 87 (50%), and 37 (21%) treated eyes, respectively. Eyes with a CFT of ≥400 µm at the time of implant were significantly more likely to achieve a reduction in CFT of ≥10%, ≥25%, and ≥50% at 12 months (all p?<?.001) compared with eyes with a CFT of <400 µm at implant. Both retinal thickness and changes in retinal thickness were loosely correlated with visual acuity.

Conclusion: A marked reduction in retinal thickness was observed in people following FAc intravitreal implant for DME. The response was related to the degree of retinal thickness prior to treatment.     

Comparison of data characterizing the clinical effectiveness of the fluocinolone intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN) in patients with diabetic macular edema from the real world,non-interventional ICE-UK study and the FAME randomized controlled trials

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant between the observational Iluvien Clinical Evidence study in the United Kingdom (ICE-UK) and the Fluocinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema (FAME) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in people with diabetic macular edema (DME). Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00344968.

Methods: This study selected patients randomized to receive 0.2?µg/day FAc insert (FAc treated eyes) or sham injection (control eyes) from the FAME RCTs, and patients’ first FAc treated eye and non-FAc treated fellow (control) eye from the ICE-UK study. Outcomes included change in visual acuity (VA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Results: After 12 months follow-up, mean change in VA was 5.0 letters improvement (p?<?.001) and 1.6 letters improvement (p?=?.003) in FAME FAc treated and control eyes, and 3.8 letters (p?=?.012) and –2.1 letters (p?=?.056) in ICE-UK FAc treated and control eyes, respectively. Mean change in CFT was –144?µm (p?<?.001) vs –72?µm (p?<?.001) in FAME FAc treated and control eyes and –113 µm (p?<?.001) vs –13?µm (p?<?.001) in ICE-UK FAc treated and control eyes. For eyes with a follow-up of 12 months, 77 (22.3%) and 15 (8.6%) FAME FAc treated and control eyes and 25 (18.7%) and six (4.3%) ICE-UK FAc treated and control eyes required emergent IOP-lowering therapy.

Conclusions: Statistically significant improvements in VA 12 months after FAc implantation were observed in both the real-world study and in the RCTs. The improvement in VA and CFT in the RCTs was marginally greater than in the real-world study; however, recruits in the real-world study had more severe visual morbidity at baseline. Whilst there were many changes in the care of people with DME over this time, these data all support the value of treatment with FAc intravitreal implant.     

Sustained-release fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insert for macular edema: clinical pharmacology and safety evaluation

Introduction: Inflammation plays a key role in the pathological processes leading to macular edema. Sustained release, low-dose intraocular corticosteroid delivery devices provide long-term anti-inflammatory therapy. Recently, a novel fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insert (FAi, Iluvien), has been introduced with promising long-term results in the treatment of macular edema.

Areas covered: An extensive review of the literature in the English language was performed to provide comprehensive information on the pharmacological properties of FAi and its safety and efficacy data from various multi-center randomized clinical trials.

Expert opinion: The FAc, Retisert is a sustained-release device that is surgically implanted in the vitreous and has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior or panuveitis. FAi was developed after FAc and is an intravitreal corticosteroid delivery system that allows controlled release of therapeutic levels of fluocinolone acetonide (FA). Initial efficacy and safety data suggest that this delivery system maintains clinical effectiveness for up to 3 years after a single delivery of the device. This second-generation fluocinolone delivery device has shown superior safety results in clinical trials compared to the previous version of the higher dose FAc (0.59 mg). Sustained delivery preparations may help to reduce the treatment burden and its associated risks by decreasing the frequency of intravitreal injections. However, much needs to be learnt from additional clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance and results of extension studies. Concerns of intravitreal corticosteroids, such as cataract and increase in intraocular pressure, remain major challenges for this therapeutic strategy.     

Drug safety evaluation of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide

Introduction: Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is a steroidal drug that has been widely administered intravitreally for retinal and choroidal conditions. Safety of steroidal products for intraocular use is essential because of their risk of ocular adverse events. This review comprehensively discusses the safety of intravitreal administration of TA.

Areas covered: This paper analyzes the mechanisms of action and key pharmacokinetic attributes and provides a discussion of the main clinical trials investigating clinical applications of intravitreal TA. The safety of intravitreal TA is evaluated through a search of the Medline database from 1980 to 2011. The most relevant literature on the safety of intravitreal TA is also discussed.

Expert opinion: The complications of intravitreal TA therapy include secondary ocular hypertension in about 20 – 40% of eyes, steroid-induced cataract in about 15 – 20% of cases and postinjection infectious endophthalmitis and pseudoendophthalmitis in less than 1%. TA is an effective drug for various retinal and choroidal diseases when delivered intravitreally. It may imply an off-label use and it may be associated with ocular adverse events. Intravitreal TA is not associated with significant systemic safety risks.     

Fluocinolone acetonide ophthalmic--Bausch & Lomb: fluocinolone acetonide Envision TD implant

Bausch & Lomb and Control Delivery Systems have developed an intravitreal implant that can deliver the corticosteroid fluocinolone acetonide [fluocinolone acetonide implant, Retisert] to posterior eye tissue for up to 3 years. The implant uses Bausch & Lomb's Envision TD technology. This fluocinolone acetonide implant has been designed for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye and other eye disorders, which benefit from local anti-inflammatory therapy. In July 2003, Bausch & Lomb assumed all responsibility for day-to-day clinical development and regulatory activities relating to fluocinolone acetonide implant development from Control Delivery Systems. In May 2002, Control Delivery systems and Bausch & Lomb formally amended their budget for their license and development agreement. Bausch & Lomb will increase its funding to support the development of agents for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema, posterior uveitis and wet age-related macular degeneration to USD $206 million through to 2008. In January 2004, Bausch & Lomb decided to focus development of the fluocinolone acetonide implant in only one indication, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye. It had been in development for other indications, including macular oedema and age-related macular degeneration. However, these will be targeted with later-generation implant technologies, different drugs, or combinations of both. The implant delivering fluocinolone acetonide 0.59 mg or 2.1mg has completed enrollment in two pivotal 3-year phase IIb/III trials in the US, Canada, Australia and Asia for the treatment of posterior uveitis. Enrollment in these multicenter randomised, double-masked studies was closed in May 2003. Bausch & Lomb was expected to file an NDA with the US FDA for the use of the agent in the treatment of uveitis in mid-2003. However, in February 2003, the company reported that, after a review of various filing strategies, the date of filing for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye would be held back until mid-2004, with possible commercialisation during 2005. Positive results based on 34-week data from the first phase III trial of fluocinolone acetonide implant, conducted in 26 US centres and one centre in Singapore, were reported in September 2003. Patients in this trial will be followed for an additional 2.5 years. Thirty-four-week results from the second phase III trial, conducted in 239 patients at 19 centres in Canada, the US, Australia, India, the Philippines and Hong Kong, have confirmed results in the initial phase III study, and were presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Retina Society. Bausch & Lomb continues to target commercialisation for 2005. In May 2000, the fluocinolone acetonide implant was granted fast-track status from the FDA and in July 2000 it received Orphan Drug designation from the FDA for posterior uveitis. In addition, enrollment was completed in a phase II trial of a fluocinolone acetonide 0.59 mg implant for the treatment of predominantly occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in patients with AMD in July 2002. However, development in this indication has been discontinued.     

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy of diabetic macular edema

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a sight threatening disease and a major cause for blindness for people in working age. The pathogenesis is multifactorial and complex. The pharmacotherapy of DME addresses both the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors and inflammatory processes by the intravitreal application of steroids. Several trials have been published reporting on the efficacy and safety of these treatments.

Areas covered: This review discusses original research articles including basic science and clinical studies as well as review articles focusing on the role of inflammation and VEGF expression in DME. It discusses newly published clinical trials on intravitreal pharmacotherapy for DME. The literature was searched using Medline/PubMed and was selected given its relevance for the topic to be discussed.

Expert opinion: Our knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of diabetic macular edema has significantly increased. Some of these insights have been successfully transferred into current treatment strategies already including VEGF suppression or anti-inflammatory treatments using steroids. The identification of additional pathophysiological aspects and their relevance as potential treatment targets will be a future challenge in the treatment of DME. A better knowledge on the complex pathophysiology will also help to establish combination strategies.     

Health-economic evaluation of fluocinolone acetonide 190 µg implant in people with diabetic macular edema

Abstract

Objectives: To assess healthcare resource use and costs of treating people with clinically significant diabetic macular edema (DME) with fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) 190 µg intravitreal implant in routine clinical practice.

Methods: The retrospective Iluvien Clinical Evidence (ICE-UK) study collected data on people prescribed the FAc implant in any one of 13 ophthalmology centers between April 1, 2013 and April 15, 2015. Data were collected for 12 months before and after implantation. Standard UK costs were attributed to healthcare resource use.

Results: In total, 208 people contributing 233 FAc-treated eyes were selected. Mean age was 68.1 years and 62% were male. The mean (standard deviation, SD) number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections per FAc treated eye in the 12 months prior to implant was 2.8 (2.5), decreasing to 0.6 (1.4) for the same period after implant (p?<?.001). The corresponding figures for other steroid injections (dexamethasone and triamcinolone) were 0.14 (0.4) before and 0.08 (0.4) after implant (p?=?.016). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of laser therapies required in the 12 months before and after FAc implant (mean?=?0.12 vs 0.11, respectively; p?=?.626). Overall, mean (SD) healthcare costs were £2,691 (£1,850) before and £1,239 (£1,203) after FAc implant (p?<?.001). The unit drug and administration cost per FAc implant was £5,680.

Conclusions: Excluding the cost of the FAc implant, healthcare costs were significantly reduced in the 12 months post-implant. FAc implant has a duration of 3 years. This needs to be considered when interpreting the cost associated with the FAc implant.     

Fluocinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

In addition to VEGF inhibitors such as ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab, clinical and experimental investigations have revealed the great potential of steroids in the treatment of DME. At present two intravitreal steroid inserts are approved for the treatment of DME containing either dexamethasone or fluocinolone acetat (FA) as a pharmacological compound. The non degradable intravitreal FA insert releases 0.2 µg FA per day (Iluvien, Alimera Sciences). Clinical phase III studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of the FA insert to last up to three years, especially in patients with a prolonged history of DME of at least three years at the initiation of therapy. While the treatment appears to be well tolerated over all, side effects such as cataract formation in nearly all treated phakic patients and raise of intraocular pressure need to be discussed with the patients as potential complications of the treatment.     

Effect of intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant on corneal endothelium in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion

Objective: To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex®) on corneal endothelium in patients with retinal vein occlusion complicated with macular edema.

Materials and methods: Patients (n?=?31) received 1–3 intravitreal DEX implants in one eye. Measurements were intraocular pressure (IOP) at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after the first intravitreal injection and corneal specular microscopy and central corneal thickness (CCT) at baseline and 1 and 6 months. We analyzed endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation of cell size (CV), and percentage of hexagonality.

Results: Mean follow-up period was 9.7?±?3.3 months. Mean number of injections was 1.5?±?0.8. Mean IOP values were 15.6?±?2.6?mm Hg at baseline, 17.7?±?3.6?mm Hg at one month, 16.4?±?4.1?mm Hg at three months, and 16.0?±?2.7?mm Hg at six months. There was a significant difference in mean IOPs at one month and six months (p?=?0.008). There were no significant differences in mean ECD (p?=?0.375), CV (p?=?0.661), percentage of hexagonality (p?=?0.287), and CCT (p?=?0.331).

Conclusion: Although intravitreal injection of 0.7?mg DEX causes moderate elevation of IOP, it does not seem to have detrimental effects on corneal endothelium at six months.     

Intraocular corticosteroids for posterior segment disease: 2012 update

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic macular edema (DME), cystoid macular edema (CME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) and uveitis are responsible for severe visual impairment worldwide. In some patients with these conditions, treatment with intraocular corticosteroids may be beneficial. Although off-label use of these agents has occurred for many years, novel agents including preservative-free and sustained-release intravitreal implants are currently being studied in clinical trials (CTs). AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews the use of CTs for vitreoretinal (VR) diseases including choroidal neovascularization, CME, DME, RVO and posterior uveitis. It also discusses the use of corticosteroids for treating VR disease, including dexamethasone, fluocinolone acetonide, intravitreal implants and triamcinolone acetonide. EXPERT OPINION: Used alone, intravitreal corticosteroids may benefit disorders such as DME, RVO and uveitis compared with standard therapy. Cases of exudative AMD non-responsive to standard treatment may benefit from combination therapy, including usage of intravitreal corticosteroid injections. Intraoperative use of these agents may aid visualization of retinal structures. Sustained-release intraocular implants have been approved for posterior uveitis and RVO associated with macular edema. In spite of this, most intraocular corticosteroids have a limited duration of action along with significant side effects, including cataract and glaucoma. Currently, intravitreal corticosteroid usage for DME is considered off-label.     

Dexamethasone for ocular inflammation

Introduction: Corticosteroids, administered systemically and periocularly, have long been used to treat intermediate and posterior segment noninfectious uveitis. In addition to systemic immunosuppressive medications, these therapies are used to reduce inflammation, prevent structural complications and prevent long-term visual loss in patients with uveitis. While systemic immunosuppressive therapies carry their own set of side effects, treatment with local steroids is associated with the risk of development of cataract and glaucoma.

Areas covered: Intravitreal delivery of fluocinolone acetonide via a sustained-release implant (Retisert) was approved by the FDA in 2005 for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis. Recently, the FDA also approved the biodegradable dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis involving the posterior segment.

Expert opinion: The single injection, 26-week data indicate that the implant is well tolerated and produces meaningful improvements in intraocular inflammation and visual acuity that persist through 6 months. The available 6-month data also indicate that this implant confers much less of a risk of ocular hypertension than other forms of intraocular steroid therapy. However, future longer-term trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety data in patients who receive multiple injections. The newly approved dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex, is a useful addition to our local armamentarium in the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis given its efficacy, safety, and ease of use in the outpatient setting.     

The use of intraocular corticosteroids

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME), cystoid macular edema (CME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) and uveitis are responsible for severe visual impairment worldwide. In some patients with these conditions, treatment with intraocular corticosteroids may be beneficial. Although off-label use of these agents has occurred for many years, novel agents including preservative-free and sustained-release intravitreal implants are currently being studied in clinical trials (CTs). Objective: To review the use of intraocular corticosteroids. Methods: Literature review. Results: Used alone, intravitreal corticosteroids may benefit disorders such as DME, RVO and uveitis compared with standard therapy or observation. Patients with AMD may benefit more from combination treatment with photodynamic therapy, intravitreal corticosteroid and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Intraoperative use of these agents may assist in visualization and manipulation of fine retinal structures. Sustained-release intraocular implants have been approved for severe posterior uveitis, and have shown benefits in ongoing CTs. Conclusion: Although intraocular corticosteroid injections have a limited duration of action requiring frequent re-treatment, and significant side effects including cataract and glaucoma development, intraocular injections may be of benefit in certain ocular disorders. Corticosteroid implants are emerging as potential treatments for macular edema due to uveitis, DME or RVO.     

Cow ghee fortified ocular topical microemulsion; in vitro,ex vivo,and in vivo evaluation

Abstract

Aim: Utility of cow ghee (CG) as permeation enhancer in development of topical ocular microemulsion (ME) for delivery of fluocinolone acetonide (FA) to posterior eye.

Methods: For ME preparation, oil, surfactant and cosurfactant were screened based on solubility of FA. Pseudoternary phase diagrams were constructed to determine their ratios. The developed MEs were characterised for their physicochemical properties like size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, and stability etc. They were evaluated for ex vivo permeation and irritation. In vivo pharmacokinetic studies were performed on Sprague dawley rats.

Results: Lauroglycol as oil, labrasol as surfactant and Transcutol as cosurfactant were selected. The optimised ratio of oil:surfactant:cosurfactant:water was 4:23:23:50. The developed FA loaded ME fortified with CG was characterised. Ex vivo study revealed higher permeation and non-irritancy. In vivo pharmacokinetic study showed retention of CG fortified ME in posterior rat eye.

Conclusion: Present investigation established CG as permeation enhancer for ocular topical formulation.     

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of fluocinolone acetonide 190 µg intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema: a comparison between study and fellow eyes

Abstract

Objectives: To compare visual and anatomical outcomes between eyes treated with fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) 190 µg intravitreal implant for clinically significant chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) and fellow eyes not treated with FAc implant using data from the Iluvien Clinical Evidence study in the UK (ICE-UK) study.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data on people attending hospital eye services and treated with the FAc implant between April 1, 2013 and April 15, 2015 were collected. Changes in visual acuity (VA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared between study eyes (intervention) and fellow eyes.

Results: A total of 208 people were selected. Mean age was 68.1 years and 62% were male. Mean change in VA was ?0.09 LogMAR units for study eyes and 0.04 LogMAR units for fellow eyes at 12 months post-implant (p?<?.001). Over the same period, ≥5 letter, ≥10 letter and ≥15 letter improvements in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score were achieved by more FAc treated eyes than by fellow eyes (41% versus 23%, p?<?.001; 28% versus 11%, p?<?.001; and 18% versus 4%, p?<?.001 at 12 months, respectively). Differences in the mean change in CFT (?113?µm versus ?13?µm, p?<?.001) and IOP (3.2?mmHg versus ?0.2?mmHg, p?<?.001) were also observed between study and fellow eyes at 12 months.

Conclusion: Visual acuity improved in study eyes over the 12 months following FAc implant and worsened in fellow eyes. Over the same period, study eyes showed a larger improvement in central foveal thickness. Intraocular pressure worsened in study eyes only. Change in visual acuity, central foveal thickness and intraocular pressure between FAc implant and the end of the 12-month follow-up period differed significantly between study and fellow eyes.     

Upcoming therapeutic advances in diabetic macular edema: an intravitreal dexamethasone drug delivery system

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus, through its ophthalmic complications diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema (DME), is a leading cause of vision loss in industrialized countries.

Areas covered: This review covers laser treatment, which is a standard treatment strategy that has proven efficacy and safety through large clinical trials in DME. Several intravitreal drug applications currently being investigated are also discussed.

Expert opinion: First results suggest that the administration of anti-VEGF compounds is effective for DME. However, frequent injections may compromise safety. In order to enhance patient compliance, sustained delivery systems are being evaluated as potential treatment approaches. So far, only steroids have been included as active in such non-biodegradable or biodegradable delivery systems. Non-biodegradable systems are more complicated to administer as surgery is required and they need to be retrieved at the end of treatment. Also, in some cases safety issues have arisen, especially around intraocular pressure control. A new biodegradable dexamethasone delivery system seems to show promising efficacy results in addition to a more favorable safety profile, which will potentially improve patient compliance. All new therapeutic approaches, alone and in combination, will need to demonstrate their efficacy and safety in DME in future trials.