The risk of stroke within a week of minor stroke or transient ischemic attack

Background: The risk of stroke is highest in the first week following an index stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Recent evidence indicates that prompt pharmacological treatment and evaluation may help mitigate this risk. Objective: To identify risk factors for recurrent stroke 1 week after index cerebrovascular event and review evidence for early and aggressive evaluation and management. Methods: We searched the National Library of Medicine Pubmed database to identify studies reporting recurrent or secondary stroke in individuals with identified stroke or TIA. Results/conclusion: The risk of recurrent stroke in the week after a TIA or minor stroke is up to 10%. Factors identified with risk of early stroke recurrence include age, elevated blood pressure, clinical symptoms of motor weakness or speech disturbance, and large vessel atherothrombotic mechanism. Studies have shown that timely initiation of stroke preventative therapy may reduce the risk of stroke within this early period.     

Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events: a review of the clinical trial data and guidelines

ABSTRACT

Background: One strategy of reducing the burden of stroke is the prevention of recurrent stroke, following an initial ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of arterial origin, by means of antiplatelet therapy.

Scope: This review article surveys and discusses the current clinical trial data and guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke/TIA of arterial origin (not stroke due to atrial fibrillation). Based on the latest available evidence, a new antiplatelet treatment algorithm for the long-term treatment of patients following atherothromboembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA is proposed.

Findings: Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin indicate that, compared with control, the relative risk reduction (RRR) for recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 19%) with aspirin, 13% (4% to 21%; p = 0.046) with dipyridamole and 34% (24% to 43%) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. Compared with aspirin, the relative risk of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is reduced by 7.3% (95% CI –5.7% to 18.7%) with clopidogrel and 18% (9% to 26%; p = 0.0003) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is not significantly more effective in preventing serious vascular events than clopidogrel alone (RRR 6.4%; –4.6% to 16.3%) in the long-term treatment of patients with previous ischaemic stroke and TIA, mainly because of a cumulative excess of bleeding complications. The relative risks and benefits of long-term treatment with clopidogrel and the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole are being compared in an ongoing large clinical trial (PRoFESS). Current Australian therapeutic guidelines for antiplatelet therapy among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin have incorporated important new findings from recently published clinical trials and recommend aspirin or the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin as the preferred long-term antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusion: Whilst awaiting the results of the PRoFESS trial, the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin is the preferred antiplatelet regimen to reduce the risk of recurrent vascular events among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin.     

Primary and secondary stroke prevention with antiplatelet drugs

Aspirin is not effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Patients with TIA or ischemic stroke carry a risk of recurrent stroke between 5 and 20% per year. In patients with TIA or ischemic stroke of noncardiac origin antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the risk of stroke by 11-15% and the risk of stroke, MI and vascular death by 15-22%. Aspirin is the most widely used drug. It is affordable and effective. Low doses of 50-325 mg aspirin are as effective as high doses and cause less gastrointestinal side effects. Severe bleeding complications are dose-dependent. The combination of aspirin with slow release dipyridamole is superior to aspirin alone for stroke prevention. Clopidgrel is superior to aspirin in patients at high risk of recurrence. The combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel is not more effective than clopidogrel alone but carries a higher bleeding risk. None of the antiplatelet agents is able to reduce mortality.     

Drug therapy for the secondary prevention of stroke in hypertensive patients: current issues and options

Hypertension is the major risk factor for ischaemic and haemorrhagic clinical strokes as well as for silent brain infarcts with a continuous association between both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Epidemiological data highlight the increasing burden to come over the next decades. Without any doubt, antihypertensive treatment is the most important therapy to reduce the risk of stroke by approximately 30-40%. International guidelines recommend antihypertensive treatment for primary prevention with evidence level A.Recurrent strokes or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are an important practical, clinical and economic problem, and have a major impact on the development of vascular dementia. All stroke patients and patients with TIA have to be regarded as very high-risk patients. Hypertension increases the risk of recurrent strokes. Only limited data directly address the role of blood pressure treatment among individuals with stroke or TIA.There is a general lack of definitive data regarding when to start antihypertensive treatment in the initial phase, and treatment of hypertension in the acute period after stroke is still under debate. Experimental and clinical data suggest that reducing the activity of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) may have beneficial effects beyond the lowering of blood pressure. There is increasing evidence of cerebroprotective effects for medication influencing the RAAS, such as angiotensin receptor antagonists or ACE inhibitors. The MOSES study showed for the first time superiority of an angiotensin receptor antagonist compared with a calcium channel antagonist in antihypertensive treatment for secondary stroke prevention. Optimal blood pressure range in secondary prevention seems to be 120-140/80-90 mm Hg, but questions about a J- or U-shaped curve are still not answered sufficiently. The effects of additional antihypertensive treatment in the evening for stroke patients with 'non-dipping' blood pressure need to be investigated.Currently, the most important goal in primary and secondary prevention of stroke is a strict normotensive blood pressure control. Antihypertensive treatment is recommended for both prevention of recurrent stroke and prevention of other vascular events in individuals who have had an ischaemic stroke or TIA (class I, level of evidence A). Many open questions remain and funding of stroke research needs to be increased in the near future.     

Adverse effects and drug interactions of antithrombotic agents used in prevention of ischaemic stroke

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the US. Primary prevention of stroke can be achieved by control of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elevated cholesterol levels and smoking. Approximately one-third of all ischaemic strokes occur in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The mainstay of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke is the addition of medical therapy with antithrombotic agents to control the risk factors for stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with significant medical complications, particularly bleeding.Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been shown to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in the prevention of stroke, with fewer adverse bleeding events. Aspirin has been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Ticlopidine may be more effective in preventing stroke than aspirin, but is associated with unacceptable haematological complications. Clopidogrel may have some benefit over aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction, but has not been shown to be superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may be more effective than aspirin alone in acute coronary syndromes, but the incidence of adverse bleeding is significantly higher. Furthermore, the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel has not been shown to be more effective for prevention of recurrent stroke than clopidogrel alone, while the rate of bleeding complications was significantly higher with combination therapy. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has been demonstrated to be more effective than aspirin alone, with the same rate of adverse bleeding complications as low-dose aspirin. When selecting the appropriate antithrombotic agent for secondary prevention of stroke, the adverse event profile of the drug must be taken into account when assessing the overall efficacy of the treatment plan.     

Safety of clopidogrel and aspirin for stroke prevention: implications of the CHARISMA trial.

Antiplatelet therapy is universally recommended for the prevention of recurrent events in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute and chronic coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial disease. However, choosing which antiplatelet agents to use in these situations remains controversial. The use of aspirin, aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, or clopidogrel is recommended as initial therapy in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events. Based on the results of the MATCH trial, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel is not recommended for patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA due to the increased risk of haemorrhage.The results of the CHARISMA trial support this recommendation; despite previous data demonstrating a favourable benefit-risk profile of aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome, this combination should not be used in patients at high risk for atherothrombosis and those with previous stroke or TIA. In these patients, the CHARISMA trial demonstrated a lack of significant clinical efficacy and an increased risk of bleeding with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone.Further research is needed to assess the benefit-risk ratio of clopidogrel plus aspirin in specific subpopulations of patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events, and to determine the role of clopidogrel plus aspirin in preventing cardioembolic stroke or early recurrent stroke after symptomatic large-vessel atherostenosis. Recent and ongoing studies are seeking to better define the roles of different antiplatelet regimens in preventing recurrent stroke.     

替格瑞洛与阿司匹林治疗急性脑卒中及短暂性脑缺血发作的临床疗效比较

目的 比较替格瑞洛与阿司匹林在急性脑卒中及短暂性脑缺血发作患者中预防卒中复发的临床疗效和安全性。方法 以急性脑卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者为研究对象,卒中症状发生后的24 h内随机分配接受替格瑞洛或阿司匹林治疗。观察治疗后90 d内主要终点事件（复发性卒中、心血管事件或全因死亡）以及次要终点事件（出血和呼吸困难）的发生率。结果 共纳入1 307例患者,替格瑞洛组651例,阿司匹林组656例。治疗90 d内,替格瑞洛组47例患者（7.2%）发生主要终点事件,其中38例复发缺血性卒中（5.9%）;阿司匹林组52例患者（7.9%）发生主要终点事件,其中44例复发缺血性卒中（6.8%）。替格瑞洛治疗能显著降低二次卒中的发生率（P=0.03）。对于次要终点事件观察发现：替格瑞洛组发生轻微出血8例（1.3%）,呼吸困难40例（6.2%）;阿司匹林组轻微出血4例（0.6%）,呼吸困难9例（1.4%）;替格瑞洛组轻微出血和呼吸困难的发生率略高于阿司匹林治疗组。结论 对于急性脑卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者,相比于阿司匹林治疗,替格瑞洛能够显著降低患者二次卒中的发生率。     

Clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of stroke

Patients suffering a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke (IS) have a high risk of recurrence. The inhibition of platelet function is effective in the reduction of secondary vascular events in patients with TIA or stroke. This is true for acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), clopidogrel, ticlopidine and the combination of ASA plus slow-release dipyridamole. This overview analyses the results of recent trials and presents ongoing or future trials with clopidogrel as well as the combination of clopidogrel plus ASA. Clopidogrel is superior to ASA in the prevention of vascular events in patients with IS, myocardial infarction (MI) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The difference is highest for high-risk patients such as diabetics, patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery and patients with a remote prior history of ischaemic events. A prediction model is presented which allows the identification of patients in whom clopidogrel is superior to ASA for the secondary prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and ASA is better than ASA alone in patients undergoing coronary stent implantations and patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI. In high-risk patients with TIA or stroke, the addition of ASA to clopidogrel is not superior to ASA monotherapy but results in a higher rate of bleeding complications. The long-term combination therapy is currently investigated in several large trials in > 30,000 patients, with a large number of stroke patients.     

Pharmaceutical care for patients with ischemic stroke: improving the patients quality of life

Objectives To improve patients health-related quality of life (HQL) after transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke; to guarantee an effective secondary prevention; to increase the patient’s satisfaction with recommendations regarding their medication by pharmacists. Setting Stroke Unit, neurological ward at the Klinikum Fulda, rehabilitation hospitals and community-based pharmacies in the region of Fulda, Germany. Method Patients with TIA or ischemic stroke were included. The patients were assigned to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The individual assignment of patients to IG or CG was based on the type of the local pharmacy to which patients belong. Community-based pharmacies either delivered standard care (CG) or provided additional intensified pharmaceutical care (PC; IG). Pharmacies delivering PC belong to a pre-existing “Quality Assurance Working Group” (QAWG). To evaluate the patient’s HQL, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) was used at study entry in hospital and at 12 months. The secondary prevention was documented at study entry in hospital and at 12 months. The patients’ satisfaction was measured by a questionnaire at the end of the study. Main outcome measures Patients’ HQL; secondary prevention; patients’ satisfaction with recommendations of the pharmacists with regards to their medication. Results Out of 1316 patients screened for participation in this study, 255 were recruited with 90/255 patients assigned to the IG and 165/255 patients assigned to the CG. During the study, the HQL of the patients in the IG did not change significantly. A significant decrease in the HQL was observed for the CG in 7/8 subscales and in both summary measures of the SF-36. After 12 months, 85.3% of the patients in the IG and 86.3% of the patients in the CG were treated with antiplatelet drugs or oral anticoagulants in accordance to treatment guidelines. Patients in the IG were significantly more satisfied with the individualized recommendations of the pharmacists than patients in the CG. Conclusion Our findings indicate that an intensified PC of patients after ischemic stroke by dedicated pharmacists may have a positive impact on HQL and patients’ satisfaction. PC in this study had no impact on adherence to secondary prevention medication.     

Progress in reducing the burden of stroke

1. The burden of stroke worldwide is growing rapidly, driven by an ageing population and by the rapid rate of urbanization and industrialization in the developing world. There are approximately 5 million fatal and 15 million non-fatal strokes each year and over 50 million survivors of stroke alive, worldwide, today. 2. The most important determinant of stroke risk is blood pressure, with a strong, continuous relationship between the level of the systolic and diastolic pressures and the risk of initial and recurrent stroke, in both Western and Asian populations. 3. Randomized clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that blood pressure lowering reduces the risk of initial stroke by 35-40% in hypertensive patients; but, until recently, there was no conclusive evidence that blood pressure lowering was effective in the secondary prevention of stroke. 4. The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) has provided definitive evidence that blood pressure lowering in patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) reduces the incidence of secondary stroke by 28%, of major vascular events by 26% and of major coronary events by 26%. These reductions were all magnified by approximately 50% in a subgroup of patients in whom the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril was routinely combined with the diuretic indapamide. 5. Successful global implementation of a treatment with perindopril and indapamide in patients with a history of stroke or TIA would markedly reduce the burden of stroke and could avert between 0.5 and one million strokes each year, worldwide.     

Contemporary management of transient ischemic attack: role of the pharmacist

Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) have been redefined recently. The new tissue-based definition of TIA abandons the 24-hour restriction on symptom duration previously used to differentiate TIA from acute ischemic stroke and requires neuroimaging studies to identify the cause of the ischemia and to determine the presence and extent of brain injury. This new definition brings to light the need for urgent diagnostic testing and timely initiation of treatment, as well as secondary prevention measures to reduce the increased risk of stroke, cardiovascular complications, and death in the days and weeks after a TIA. Pharmacists play a key role in identifying patients at risk for a first or recurrent TIA or stroke, educating high-risk patients on the signs and symptoms of TIA or stroke and the need for urgent evaluation and treatment, overcoming barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment, and ensuring that appropriate primary or secondary prevention strategies are in place. Furthermore, studies have shown that pharmacist-led interventions can lead to significant improvements in modifiable risk factors, such as blood pressure and cholesterol levels, as well as drug adherence, and may reduce the occurrence of strokes. These interventions may also help maintain patients' health-related quality of life and improve patients' satisfaction with care.     

Role of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease II: Ischemic stroke

The etiology of cerebrovascular disease is heterogeneous, with the majority of strokes being of ischemic origin. Transient ischemic attack is now considered to be an important precursor and long-term risk factor for ischemic stroke. Given the lack of acute therapies for ischemic stroke, current

treatments focus on secondary prevention through risk-factor management, pharmacotherapy and interventional approaches. As illustrated in this paper, antiplatelet agents (e.g. clopidogrel, aspirin, dipyridamole) are the cornerstone of therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.     

Efficacy and costs of secondary prevention with antiplatelets after ischaemic stroke

Ischaemic stroke and other atherothrombotic events substantially increase the medico-economic burden because of their high treatment costs and long-lasting disabilities with need for chronic care. Studies have shown that the cost of stroke represents approximately 3 - 5% of the annual health budget. Antiplatelet agents play a major role in secondary stroke prevention. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), ASA combined with extended-release dipyridamole (ER-Dip), and clopidogrel are all acceptable choices for first-line treatment in the secondary prevention of stroke. The newer antiplatelets, however, are more expensive than ASA, and their cost-effectiveness is not easily estimated. ASA has to be given to 33 stroke patients to prevent one future stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death compared with placebo. Adding ER-Dip to ASA increases the benefit for the patients. A total of 33 stroke patients had to be treated with this combination, instead of ASA, to prevent one stroke. However, the combination of ASA plus ER-Dip does not prevent MI, vascular death or the combined end point of either stroke or death. Clopidogrel is more effective than ASA in preventing a combined end point of ischaemic stroke, MI, or vascular death, but it has not been shown to be superior to ASA in preventing recurrent stroke in transient ischaemic attack or stroke patients. Several subgroups, such as stroke patients with additional peripheral artery disease, patients with prior coronary artery bypass, patients with insulin-dependent diabetes, and patients with recurrent vascular events, were identified, in whom the benefit of clopidogrel is amplified. Taking economical aspects into account, the fixed combination of ASA and ER-Dip can be recommended for secondary stroke prevention as a first-line alternative to ASA in patients without major comorbidity. In patients with higher comorbidity, clopidogrel may be more effective for the individual patient compared with ASA, and might also be cost-effective. Furthermore, in patients with ASA intolerance clopidogrel is a useful, but expensive, alternative.     

A benefit-risk assessment of agents used in the secondary prevention of stroke.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Full assessment of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients is required to identify all risk factors and apply appropriate secondary preventative strategies. Antiplatelet therapies are effective in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and can be justified despite adverse effects such as gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), aspirin plus dipyridamole, ticlopidine and clopidogrel are all of value but their adverse effect profiles vary significantly. Combinations of antiplatelet agents may offer additional benefit but not all combinations have been studied in stroke patients. Anticoagulation with agents such as warfarin is effective with coexisting atrial fibrillation and other conditions predisposing to cardioembolic stroke. Antihypertensive agents have been extensively studied in the primary prevention of stroke; however, relatively few trials of antihypertensive agents in the secondary prevention of stroke are available. The incidence of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents is relatively low and the benefit-risk profile would tend to favour their use in the secondary prevention of stroke. Recent studies of ACE inhibitors have identified an important role for these agents in the secondary prevention of stroke even in those who are normotensive and in those who have had a haemorrhagic stroke. The incidence of serious adverse effects with ACE inhibitors appears relatively low. Lipid-lowering agents may have a role to play in certain groups of patients with stroke. The incidence of adverse effects is relatively low with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for stroke and evidence is available that smoking cessation does reduce the individual's risk of stroke. Pharmacological agents are available to help smoking cessation. In patients with diabetes mellitus, intensive regimens with insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents have so far not definitively been shown to reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications such as stroke. Tight glycaemic control has been shown to improve microvascular complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy and hence this is reason enough to advocate the use of these agents. Future developments in the treatment of diabetes may help. Secondary prevention of stroke has improved greatly over the past decade and hopefully will continue to improve. The use of pharmacological agents available currently and in the future will be clarified and refined as further clinical trials report.     

Atorvastatin in prevention of stroke and transient ischaemic attack

Besides blood pressure-lowering drugs and, in certain circumstances, antithrombotic agents, statins are among the most effective drugs in reducing the risk of stroke in populations of patients at high vascular risk, as well as the risk of major coronary events. In secondary prevention of stroke, statins clearly reduced the risk of major coronary events. In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels) trial, compared with placebo, the patients with a recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack without coronary heart disease randomised to atorvastatin 80 mg/day had a significant 16% relative risk reduction of stroke and a 35% reduction in the risk of major coronary events. This was obtained despite the fact that 25% of patients allocated to the placebo arm were prescribed a commercially available statin outside the trial. A post-hoc analysis used blinded low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measurements (taken at study visits during the trial) as a marker of adherence to lipid-lowering therapy. Compared with the group with no change or an increase in LDL-C (the group adherent to placebo or not taking a statin), the group with >or= 50% reduction in LDL-C had a significant 31% reduction in the risk of stroke. The next step is to define whether or not achieving a LDL-C of < 70 mg/dl is better than a standard dose of statin (LDL approximately 100 - 110 mg/dl) in the secondary prevention of stroke. Statins are effective in reducing both first-ever and recurrent stroke, and this effect seems driven by the extent of LDL-C lowering.     

Cost-effectiveness of stroke treatments and secondary preventions

Introduction: Stroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It imposes a significant burden in terms of costs, premature death, long-term disability, restricted social functioning and reduction in patient's quality of life. Effective interventions in stroke treatment and prevention have long-term clinical and economic consequences.

Areas covered: This review focuses on the cost-effective evaluations regarding the medical treatments of acute stroke and long-term secondary prevention of stroke. A comprehensive electronic search for economic evaluations in this area was conducted. Different economic modeling approaches, evidence considered in the evaluations and the key findings are all reviewed and discussed.

Expert opinion: Intravenous thrombolysis is consistently shown to be the most cost-effective option for acute stroke treatment. Clopidogrel, statin, warfarin and dabigatran are considered as the most cost-effective treatments for secondary stroke prevention. However, lack of long-term outcome data and long-term resource use data adds tremendous uncertainty to the cost-effectiveness stories of these treatments. Economic studies that are updated with more recent clinical findings and studies that seek to identify the cost-effective combinations of different types of treatments are warranted. Also, few of the published economic evaluations considered the economic impact of these treatments on subgroups and individuals with different risks.     

Secondary prevention of stroke: a practical guide to drug treatment

Stroke is a disease of the elderly and, as a result of the expected demographic changes in many industrialised countries, its incidence is likely to increase in the future. A first-ever stroke significantly increases the likelihood of further events; thus, secondary prevention is of major importance. Only a minority of recurrent strokes can be prevented by surgical or other invasive methods, meaning that most secondary preventive measures involve drug treatment, which has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years. Ischaemic stroke constitutes the vast majority of all strokes; effective secondary prevention depends on a variety of factors, of which the correct classification in terms of subtypes and aetiological mechanisms is a pivotal prerequisite, as is the assessment of the patient's cardiovascular risk profile. In addition to the evaluation of pathomechanisms, stratification of subtypes of brain infarction is mainly based on morphology seen with brain imaging techniques, which provides additional evidence for the presumed cause of the stroke. Inhibitors of platelet function and anticoagulants are the two major groups of antithrombotic drugs used for the secondary prevention of stroke. Antiplatelet agents are still indicated in the majority of patients after ischaemic stroke, especially if an arterial origin is presumed. In addition to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), the position of which as the first-line antiplatelet drug is increasingly being questioned, other compounds with antiplatelet activity have been developed and have proven effective in secondary stroke prevention, including ticlopidine, clopidogrel and dipyridamole. Anticoagulants are principally indicated after cardioembolic ischaemic stroke; however, their inherent bleeding risks render their use in many cases rather difficult, in particular for elderly patients. Patient compliance with the recommended treatment is of major importance, given the somewhat limited efficacy of antithrombotic agents in stroke prevention. Since 'real world' experience does not match the circumstances under which clinical trials are conducted, this article will also deal with problems not covered by specific studies, such as risk stratification for anticoagulant treatment and how to proceed in cases of unknown stroke aetiology. The management of major cardiovascular risk factors is the other mainstay of secondary stroke prevention. Recent evidence indicates that antihypertensive treatment may be as effective as antithrombotic drugs for secondary prevention of stroke. This still needs to be proven for the treatment of other cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia. Nevertheless, the results of recent studies investigating the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ('statins') on cardiovascular events strongly suggest a stroke-preventive effect.     

Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the prevention of secondary stroke

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (warfarin, phenprocoumon) is effective both for primary and secondary stroke prevention with a 60–70% relative reduction in stroke risk compared with placebo. Mortality is reduced by 26%. VKA have a number of well-documented shortcomings which were overcome by non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

Areas covered: Results of randomized trials for four NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) have been published (ARISTOTLE, RE-LY, ENGAGE, ROCKET-AF). In this review, the authors discuss the results in subgroups of patients with prior transient ischemic attacks or ischemic stroke. In aggregate, the NOACs are superior to warfarin for secondary prevention and result in a 50% reduction in intracerebral hemorrhage. Apixaban was superior to aspirin in the AVERROES trial and had a similar rate of major bleeding complications.

Expert opinion: NOACs add to the therapeutic options for secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF and offer advantages over warfarin including a favorable bleeding profile and convenience of use. Aspirin should no longer be used for secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF.     

缺血性脑卒中发病影响因素的研究

目的:探讨缺血性脑卒中发病的影响因素,为预防和控制缺血性脑卒中的发生和发展提供科学依据。方法:采用1∶1配比进行对比研究,收集病例和对照各206例,调查研究对象的既往病史、家族史、环境因素等资料,采用SP SS 13.0统计软件对研究因素进行L og istic回归分析。结果:体育锻炼为缺血性脑卒中的保护性因素,OR值为0.116;高血压、高血糖、体重指数(BM I)和吸烟为缺血性脑卒中发病的危险因素,OR值分别为5.392,2.768,3.568,4.826。结论:及时防治高血压和糖尿病等原发病,积极控制体重和吸烟,养成良好的生活方式是预防和控制缺血性脑卒中的最有效的措施。     

阿司匹林联合双嘧达莫用于缺血性脑卒中二级预防的Meta分析

目的以阿司匹林为对照组,系统评价阿司匹林双嘧达莫联合用药,对缺血性脑卒中二级预防的有效性和安全性。方法通过卒中、非致死性卒中、各种原因引起的死亡及非致死性卒中与各种原因引起的死亡联合事件发生的相对危险度,分析联合用药的有效性,通过出血性并发症及脑出血发生的相对危险度,分析联合用药的安全性。结果 a.与阿司匹林相比较,联合用药能更有效的预防卒中的发生(RR=0.86 95%CI[0.74,1.00]),使非致死性卒中的发生率降低22%(RR=0.78 95%CI[0.67,0.90]),也能明显降低非致死性卒中与各种原因引起的死亡联合事件的发生率(RR=0.87 95%CI[0.79,0.96])。但是,联合用药对各种原因引起的死亡无效(RR=0.98,95%CI[0.85,1.13])。b.与阿司匹林相比较,联合用药不会增加出血性并发症的发生率(RR=0.95,95%CI[0.80,1.12]),但可以使脑出血的发生率增加14%(RR=1.14,95%CI[0.54,2.42]),尽管这一结果无明显统计学意义。结论与阿司匹林相比较,联合用药对卒中、非致死性卒中及非致死性卒中与各种原因引起的死亡联合事件的预防更有效,联合用药不会增加出血性并发症的发生率,但能轻微增加脑出血的发生率。