AZD6140

Oral antiplatelet therapy with P2Y₁₂ receptor blockers (especially clopidogrel) is the current choice of treatment during acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous interventions. To address the various limitations of thienopyridine therapy (including response variability and non-responsiveness) a novel drug, AZD6140, is under clinical development. AZD6140 is an oral and reversible P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker that does not require hepatic conversion to an active metabolite and produces an overall superior ADP-induced platelet inhibition with less response variability than clopidogrel. It has fast onset and offset actions that may be advantageous in patients who may have to undergo immediate surgery.     

Prasugrel

Clinical trials have demonstrated the superior clinical efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy with a thienopyridine (a P2Y(12) receptor blocker) and aspirin (COX-1 inhibitor) in patients undergoing stenting as well as patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, clopidogrel treatment is associated with a wide response variability and non-responsiveness in selected patients. The latter phenomenon is linked to the occurrence of recurrent ischaemic events including stent thrombosis in the recent studies. Prasugrel is a new thienopyridine derivative that produces more potent platelet inhibition and a rapid onset of action that is associated with irreversible P2Y(12) receptor blockade. The latter properties of prasugrel may provide a superior alternative to clopidogrel, with less response variability and a decreased prevalence of non-responsiveness.     

AZD6140

Oral antiplatelet therapy with P2Y(12) receptor blockers (especially clopidogrel) is the current choice of treatment during acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous interventions. To address the various limitations of thienopyridine therapy (including response variability and non-responsiveness) a novel drug, AZD6140, is under clinical development. AZD6140 is an oral and reversible P2Y(12) receptor blocker that does not require hepatic conversion to an active metabolite and produces an overall superior ADP-induced platelet inhibition with less response variability than clopidogrel. It has fast onset and offset actions that may be advantageous in patients who may have to undergo immediate surgery.     

Genetics of platelet inhibitor treatment

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist is the standard of care in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) because this regimen has markedly decreased the rate of cardiovascular events. The substantial variability in pharmacodynamic response as well as the moderate antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel has raised major concerns, since high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity has consistently been associated with increased risk for ischaemic events in PCI patients. Baseline demographic and clinical variables contributing to the observed variability have been identified. Besides this, research within the past decade has focused on the impact of genetic polymorphisms encoding transport systems or enzymes involved in the absorption and metabolism of these drugs. Loss-of-function polymorphisms in CYP2C19 are the strongest individual variables affecting pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet response to clopidogrel, but explain no more than 5 to 12% of the variability in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation on clopidogrel. No genetic variables contributing to clinical outcomes of patients treated with the newer P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists, prasugrel or ticagrelor, have been identified so far. This review aims to provide an update on the current status of genotype-based personalized therapy with clopidogrel.     

Platelet P2Y<Subscript>12</Subscript> Receptor Inhibition

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with coronary artery disease. Since adenosine diphosphate (ADP) represents one of the most important mediators of thrombosis, the inhibition of the platelet ADP receptor, in particular the P2Y₁₂ subtype, plays a pivotal role in secondary prevention of recurrent atherothrombotic events in high-risk settings. Numerous clinical trials have shown the efficacy of clopidogrel, an inhibitor of the ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor, in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, laboratory and clinical experience with clopidogrel have led to understanding some of the limitations of this drug, the most important of which is its broad range in interindividual response variability, resulting in the development of novel ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor-inhibiting strategies. This article provides an overview of ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor-inhibiting strategies, including high clopidogrel dosing regimens and novel agents under advanced clinical development.     

Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: what progress has been made?

Introduction: Despite well-documented efficacy, recurrent thrombotic event occurrences, particularly stent thrombosis, have been repeatedly demonstrated in stented patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. The latter observation stimulated the close scrutiny of the pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel and revealed the ‘wide variability’ and the phenomenon of ‘antiplatelet resistance’. High on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP (HPR) during clopidogrel therapy is an independent risk factor for ischemic event occurrences in post-percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI) patients. Recent observational studies demonstrated a link between low on-treatment platelet reactivity to bleeding. The concept of a ‘therapeutic window’ of P2Y₁₂ receptor reactivity associated with both ischemic event occurrence (upper threshold) and bleeding risk (lower threshold) has been proposed.

Areas covered: An update on and a brief review of the current knowledge on antiplatelet resistance were presented. Evidence available from studies evaluating aspirin resistance and high and low on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP during P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker therapy was collected from a selective literature search.

Expert opinion: The available evidence indicates that HPR is an independent risk factor for post-PCI ischemic event occurrences. The therapeutic window concept for the P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker therapy may facilitate the balance between reducing ischemic events and avoiding bleeding events, thereby improving net clinical outcome.     

Prasugrel: a novel platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor antagonist. A review on its mechanism of action and clinical development

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel, in combination with aspirin, is associated with improvement in long-term clinical outcomes in these patients and is currently the antiplatelet therapy of choice. However, a significant number of patients experience recurrent ischemic events, which have been in part attributed to variability in individual response profiles to currently recommended treatment regimens. The presence of variable degrees of responsiveness, thus inadequate platelet inhibition in some patients, underscores the need for novel agents with more potency and less variable platelet inhibitory effects. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y₁₂ receptor. Pre-clinical and early phase clinical studies have shown prasugrel to be characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects, lower interindividual variability in platelet response, and faster onset of activity compared with clopidogrel. Recent findings from large-scale Phase III testing showed prasugrel to be more efficacious in preventing ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI; however, this is achieved at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding. This article reviews the currently available data regarding the efficacy and safety of prasugrel.     

Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profile of the oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain life-threatening disorders associated with high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in treatment over the last decade. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation via P2Y(12) receptors plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ACS. The current standard of treatment involves dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and the thienopyridine clopidogrel. Numerous studies and wide use in clinical practice have established the value of this approach in the treatment of ACS. However, clopidogrel treatment has a number of limitations, including a delayed onset of action due to the need for metabolic activation, variable and reduced antiplatelet effects in patients with certain genotypes, and prolonged recovery of platelet function due to irreversible P2Y(12) receptor binding. Prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, has demonstrated more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) than clopidogrel, although this thienopyridine also requires metabolic activation and treatment is associated with a significantly increased risk of life-threatening and fatal bleeding. The recently approved oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of current therapy due to its unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. It is a member of a new chemical class, the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidines, and is a potent P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. Ticagrelor is rapidly absorbed, with a median time to maximum concentration of 1.3-2.0 hours. Ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation to an active form and binds rapidly and reversibly to the P2Y(12) receptor. As well as exerting effects via platelet P2Y(12) receptors, ticagrelor may confer additional benefits via inhibition of non-platelet P2Y(12) receptors. The pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor is not significantly affected by age, gender or administration with food, nor by prior treatment with, or responsiveness to, clopidogrel. Ticagrelor is primarily metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme, rapidly produces plasma concentration-dependent IPA that is greater and more consistent than that observed with clopidogrel, and can also enhance platelet inhibition and overcome non-responsiveness in patients previously treated with clopidogrel. Importantly, the pharmacodynamic characteristics of ticagrelor are not influenced by CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genotypes. This article summarizes our current knowledge regarding the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profile of ticagrelor.     

Ticagrelor for the treatment of arterial thrombosis

Importance of the field: High platelet reactivity has been linked to recurrent ischemic events in patients treated with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy, in patients with arterial diseases and particularly in patients treated with coronary artery stenting. The limitations of clopidogrel have served as a major rationale for the development of new P2Y₁₂ blockers that have superior pharmacodynamic profiles uninfluenced by concomitant therapies or specific genotypes. Ticagrelor is the first direct-acting reversibly binding oral P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist. Extensive Phase II investigations have addressed the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety-related properties of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. The recently completed PLATO trial demonstrated promise for ticagrelor as a major treatment strategy for a wide spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Ticagrelor is now being reviewed by the FDA as a P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker to treat patients with coronary artery disease and, once accepted, will be in widespread use as an antiplatelet agent. Thus, it is both appropriate and timely to review available data and provide a comprehensive review of ticagrelor.

Areas covered in this review: We discuss the rationale for the development of ticagrelor, a reversible and potent P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker. The data regarding ticagrelor based on preclinical and clinical studies are examined. We researched articles about ‘AZD6140’ and ‘ticagrelor’ in PubMed from 2006 to 2010 and also reviewed data presented at recent cardiology meetings.

What the reader will gain: This is an updated and comprehensive review of ticagrelor. The advantages and disadvantages of ticagrelor and available P2Y₁₂ receptor blockers such as clopidogrel and prasugrel are discussed, thus providing a clear picture to readers.

Take home message: Ticagrelor has an important role as an antiplatelet agent in the settings of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention and once accepted will be in widespread use.     

Pharmacogenetics of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors

Oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are commonly prescribed for cardiovascular disease and include clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Each of these drugs has its strengths and weaknesses. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent inhibitors of platelet aggregation and were shown to be superior to clopidogrel in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the absence of genotyping. However, both are associated with an increased risk for non-coronary artery bypass-related bleeding. Clopidogrel is a prodrug requiring bioactivation, primarily via the CYP2C19 enzyme. Approximately 30% of individuals have a CYP2C19 no function allele and decreased or no CYP2C19 enzyme activity. Clopidogrel-treated carriers of a CYP2C19 no function allele have decreased exposure to the clopidogrel active metabolite and lesser inhibition of platelet aggregation, which likely contributed to reduced clopidogrel efficacy in clinical trials. The pharmacogenetic data for clopidogrel are most robust in the setting of PCI, but evidence is accumulating for other indications. Guidance is available from expert consensus groups and regulatory agencies to assist with integrating genetic information into P2Y₁₂ inhibitor prescribing decisions, and CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after PCI is one of the most common examples of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation. Herein, we review the evidence for pharmacogenetic associations with clopidogrel response and outcomes with genotype-guided P2Y₁₂ inhibitor selection and describe guidance to assist with pharmacogenetic implementation. We also describe processes for applying genotype data for P2Y₁₂ inhibitor therapy selection and remaining gaps in the field. Ultimately, consideration of both clinical and genetic factors may guide selection of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor therapy that optimally balances the atherothrombotic and bleeding risks.     

Ticagrelor: a P2Y12 antagonist for use in acute coronary syndromes

Agents that inhibit platelet function are used routinely in the treatment and prevention of acute coronary syndromes. The main antiplatelet treatments used combine aspirin with one of the thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ antagonists, either clopidogrel or prasugrel. By blocking the synthesis of thromboxane A₂ in platelets and by blocking the effects of ADP, respectively, these agents reduce platelet activity, platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Ticagrelor (marketed by AstraZeneca as Brilinta? in the USA, and as Brilique^® or Possia^® in Europe) is a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, a new chemical class of P2Y₁₂ antagonist that is now approved for use in the wide spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. In this article we provide an overview of ticagrelor. We discuss the differences in mode of action compared with other P2Y₁₂ antagonists, examine its pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety profile, and summarize the various clinical trials that have provided information on its efficacy in combination with aspirin. Ticagrelor appears to overcome some of the difficulties that have been encountered with other antiplatelet treatments, clopidogrel in particular.     

ADP receptors: inhibitory strategies for antiplatelet therapy

The interaction of adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP) with its platelet receptors (P2Y(1) and P2Y(12)) plays a very important role in thrombogenesis. The thienopyridine ticlopidine was the first specific antagonist of the platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor to be tested in randomized clinical trials for the prevention of arterial thrombotic events. Although ticlopidine reduces the incidence of vascular events in patients at risk, it also unfortunately has some significant drawbacks: a relatively high incidence of toxic effects, which may be fatal in some cases; delayed onset of action; and a high interindividual variability in response. A second thienopyridine, clopidogrel, has superseded ticlopidine, because it is also an efficacious antithrombotic drug and is less toxic than ticlopidine. However, clopidogrel is not completely free from faults: severe toxic effects, albeit occurring much less frequently than with ticlopidine, may still complicate its administration to patients; the onset of pharmacologic action can be accelerated by the use of large loading doses, but may still not be optimal; the high interpatient variability in response remains an important issue. These concerns justify the continued search for agents that can further improve the clinical outcome of patients with atherosclerosis through greater efficacy and/or safety. A new thienopyridyl compound, prasugrel, which is characterized by higher potency and faster onset of action compared with clopidogrel, is currently under clinical evaluation. Two direct and reversible P2Y(12) antagonists, cangrelor and AZD6140, feature very rapid onset and reversal of platelet inhibition, which make them attractive alternatives to thienopyridines, especially when rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation or its quick reversal are required. Along with new the P2Y(12) antagonists, inhibitors of the other platelet receptor for ADP, the antagonists P2Y(1), are under development and may prove to be effective antithrombotic agents.     

P2Y12 polymorphisms and antiplatelet effects of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease

Aims

Recently, two genetic polymorphisms of the platelet ADP receptor P2Y₁₂ (haplotypes H2 and 34T) have been implicated in increased platelet aggregation and atherothrombotic risk. It was suggested that these polymorphisms contribute to a diminished response to antiplatelet drugs. Therefore, we investigated the effects of these polymorphisms on platelet aggregation in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

Platelet aggregation was studied in platelet-rich plasma from 124 patients with CAD treated with 100 mg aspirin day⁻¹. P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor polymorphisms were determined by PCR-RFLP. The 52G > T polymorphism was used as tag-SNP for the H2 haplotype. Aggregation was induced by 1 mg l⁻¹ collagen. In a subgroup (n = 72), a concentration-response curve to collagen (0.5–10 mg l⁻¹), aggregation at 2 μmol l⁻¹ ADP and 1 mmol l⁻¹ arachidonic acid were determined.

Results

Whereas arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was inhibited in all patients, collagen and ADP-induced aggregation were highly variable. However, aggregation did not differ significantly between carriers and noncarriers of the 52T-allele (1 mg l⁻¹ collagen: 32.7% (21.9–38.6%) vs. 32.5% (21.2–41.6%); P = 0.77; ADP: 33.1% (29.9–40.9%) vs. 39.1% (31.5–49.7%); P = 0.34), respectively. EC₅₀ values were 1.26 mg l⁻¹ (0.79–2.02) and 1.54 mg l⁻¹ (0.98–2.4) collagen in noncarriers and carriers of the H2 haplotype, respectively (P = 0.56). Moreover, the 34°C > T polymorphism did not significantly affect any of the aggregatory responses.

Conclusions

Low-dose aspirin inhibits platelet aggregation to the same extent in patients carrying or not carrying the P2Y₁₂ H2 haplotype and/or the 34T allele. Our data do not support the hypothesis that these polymorphisms contribute to an attenuated antiplatelet effect of aspirin.

What is already known about this subject

• Genetic polymorphisms of the P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor on platelets have been shown to contribute to variability in platelet aggregation in healthy humans.
• P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor polymorphisms are more frequently present in patients with vascular disease than in healthy people.
• The majority of patients with vascular disease receive acetylsalicylic acid as an anti-aggregatory agent, which has also been shown to induce a variable response; however, the role of P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor polymorphisms in the platelet response to acetylsalicylic acid in patients with vascular disease has not yet been studied.

What this study adds

• The present data show that the platelet response to acetylsalicylic acid is independent of the presence or absence of P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor polymorphisms in patients with stable coronary artery disease who have had their first myocardial infarction.
• This is important, as studies in healthy humans had suggested that carriers of P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor polymorphisms may be at increased risk of experiencing cardiovascular events.
• However, the observed variability of the platelet response to the cyclooxygenase inhibitor acetylsalicylic acid (in our study) and to the P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor blocker clopidogrel (in a study by Angiolillo et al.[18]) in patients with coronary artery disease is clearly not determined by common P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor polymorphisms.

     

Clopidogrel

Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and clopidogrel is a guideline-recommended standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite a large body of clinical evidence obtained from randomized clinical trials and patient registries supporting the efficacy and safety of aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy in these patients, questions concerning the optimal use of dual antiplatelet therapy remain. Widely debated topics pertaining to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS or undergoing PCI include (i) the appropriate clopidogrel loading dose; (ii) the optimal time to initiate the clopidogrel loading dose; (iii) the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following ACS or PCI; (iv) impact of variability of platelet response on patient outcomes; and (v) the role of other recommended and emerging P2Y₁₂ antagonists. This review discusses these ongoing controversies regarding the optimal use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with ACS or those undergoing PCI.     

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a dangerous and urgent clinical pattern of coronary artery disease. Aspirin and adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists are the standard dual anti‐platelet therapy for patients with ACS. Ticagrelor is a new oral antagonist of the adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel or prasugrel in patients with ACS, obtaining conflicting results. Thus, we conducted a meta‐analysis of these RCTs to determine the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with ACS. Results of the meta‐analysis indicate that ticagrelor decreased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all‐cause death, but increased the risk of bleeding events. In Asiatic patients, analysis indicates that ticagrelor did not decrease the risk of MACE and all‐cause death, while increasing the risk of bleeding events. Together, this meta‐analysis suggests that ticagrelor was more effective, but less safe than clopidogrel and prasugrel in patients with ACS. Subgroup analysis indicates that ticagrelor was not more effective, although less safe than clopidogrel in Asiatic patients, thus more evidence is needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in Asiatic patients.     

Efficacy and safety analysis of new P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

Objective:

New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous (cangrelor and elinogrel) drugs, have shown improved antithrombotic effects compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in landmark trials. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new P2Y₁₂ inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients undergoing PCI.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials of at least 4 weeks, comparing new P2Y₁₂ inhibitors with clopidogrel in PCI, were identified using the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2014.

Main outcome measures:

The primary efficacy endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding.

Results:

Twelve studies including 71,097 patients met the inclusion criteria. New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors significantly reduced all-cause death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.90, p?p?p?p?=?0.03) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.92, p?=?0.001) compared with clopidogrel. There were no significant differences between stroke (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.72–1.05, p?=?0.14) and major bleeding events (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.99–1.52, p?=?0.06) between the new P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and clopidogrel groups.

Conclusion:

New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors decreased death in patients undergoing PCI compared with clopidogrel with a considerable safety and tolerability profile; however, the risk/benefit ratio of ischemic and bleeding events should be further investigated.     

Cangrelor in percutaneous coronary intervention

Cangrelor is a novel, intravenous P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist in development for use in percutaneous coronary intervention. Currently in Phase III testing, the reversible platelet inhibitor provides several inherent advantages over other P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists in this setting for the prevention of adverse cardiac events. Unlike the class of thienopyridines (ticlopidine, clopidogrel and potentially soon to be available, prasugrel), cangrelor has nearly immediate onset after a bolus dose and a short half-life, and achieves maximal inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet function. Cangrelor’s distinct mechanism of action allows for intravenous administration and avoids both hepatic and renal metabolism. These unique characteristics make cangrelor a promising agent for use in cardiovascular patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Cangrelor: a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist

Antiplatelet therapy is critical in the prevention of thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions. Current antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists) have demonstrated the capacity to reduce major adverse cardiac events. However, these agents have limitations that compromise their clinical utility. The platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor plays a central role in platelet function and is a focus in the development of antiplatelet therapies. Cangrelor is a potent, competitive inhibitor of the P2Y₁₂ receptor that is administered by intravenous infusion and rapidly achieves near complete inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. This investigational drug has been studied for use during coronary procedures and the management of patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome and is undergoing evaluation for use in the prevention of perioperative stent thrombosis.     

The CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 Polymorphisms play a Vital Role in Clopidogrel Responsiveness after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pharmacogenomics Study

Clopidogrel inhibits platelet activation and aggregation by blocking the P2Y₁₂ receptor. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended treatment by current guidelines for patients undergoing percutaneous interventions. Recurrent ischaemic cardiac events after this treatment showed lack of clopidogrel responsiveness. We aimed to investigate the most noticeable variants in the genes involved in clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A total of 347 Turkish patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions with stent implantation were included in our study. Platelet reactivity (PRU) and % inhibition were measured with VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay in blood samples collected from patients who took a standard dose of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for at least 7 days. The variants in the CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP2B6, ABCB1, ITGB3 and PON1 genes were genotyped using the Sequenom MassARRAY system. When grouped, the patients with PRU values >208 as non‐responsiveness to clopidogrel therapy; 104 (30%) patients were non‐responders and 243 (70%) patients were responders. A significant association was found between the CYP2C19*2 (G636A) polymorphism and non‐responsiveness to clopidogrel therapy (p < 0.001). An allele frequency of this single nucleotide polymorphism was high in non‐responders; its odds ratio was 2.92 compared with G allele (p < 0.001). PRU values of CT genotypes were lower (p = 0.029) and % inhibition values of CT genotypes were higher (p = 0.008) compared with CC genotypes for the CYP2C19*17 (C806T) polymorphism. None of the other genetic variants were found to be statistically associated with non‐responsiveness to clopidogrel and antiplatelet activity. Our findings suggest that the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism is associated with non‐responsiveness to clopidogrel therapy and the CYP2C19*17 polymorphism enhances antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel. Depending on haplotypes of these two polymorphisms, clopidogrel‐treated patients can be protected or not from stent thrombosis and ischaemic events.