Pharmacotherapy of the third-generation AEDs: lacosamide, retigabine and eslicarbazepine acetate

INTRODUCTION: The search for new, more effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) continues. The three most recently approved drugs, the so-called third-generation AEDs, include lacosamide, retigabine and eslicarbazepine acetate and are licensed as adjunctive treatment of partial epilepsy in adults. AREAS COVERED: For the above three AEDs, their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, drug-drug interactions, pharmacotherapeutics, dose and administration and therapeutic drug monitoring are reviewed in this paper. EXPERT OPINION: Lacosamide and retigabine act through novel mechanisms, while eslicarbazepine acetate, a pro-drug for eslicarbazepine, acts in a similar manner to several other AEDs. All three AEDs are associated with linear pharmacokinetic and rapid absorption and undergo metabolism. Their drug-drug interaction profile is low (lacosamide and retigabine) to modest (eslicarbazepine) in propensity. At the highest approved doses for the three AEDs, responder rates were similar. The most commonly observed adverse effects compared with placebo were dizziness, headache, diplopia and nausea for lacosamide; dizziness, somnolence and fatigue for retigabine and dizziness and somnolence for eslicarbazepine acetate. The precise role that these new AEDs will have in the treatment of epilepsy and whether they will make a significant impact on the prognosis of intractable epilepsy is not yet known and will have to await further clinical experience.     

Novel medications for epilepsy

Despite the introduction of many second-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the last 2 decades, the proportion of individuals with pharmacoresistant epilepsy has not been reduced substantially compared with the late 1960s. All currently available AEDs also have limitations in terms of adverse effects and susceptibility to be involved in clinically important drug-drug interactions. Therefore, the search for potentially more effective and better tolerated agents is continuing. This article reviews the pharmacological and clinical profile of the latest compounds to receive marketing authorization. Since the beginning of 2008, three novel AEDs, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate and retigabine (also known as ezogabine), have become commercially available in Europe, with lacosamide and retigabine also being licensed in the US. All three agents are indicated for the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures in adults. Eslicarbazepine acetate is a produg for eslicarbazepine, which acts by blocking voltage-dependent sodium channels. Lacosamide enhances the slow inactivation phase of voltage-dependent sodium channels, and retigabine potentiates neuronal M-currents by opening Kv 7.2-7.5 potassium channels. All three agents, which are well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, exhibit linear pharmacokinetics. Lacosamide is also available as an intravenous formulation intended as replacement therapy for patients temporarily unable to take oral medications. All three drugs are eliminated partly unchanged in urine and partly by biotransformation through glucuronide conjugation (eslicarbazepine, retigabine), N-acetylation (retigabine) and oxidative demethylation (lacosamide). The half-life is in the order of 8-20 hours for eslicarbazepine, 12-16 hours for lacosamide and 6-10 hours for retigabine. Based on the limited information available to date, the ability of these agents to cause pharmacokinetic drug interactions appears to be relatively modest, although eslicarbazepine can cause a significant decrease in the blood levels of ethinylestradiol, levonorgestrel and simvastatin. The approved effective dose ranges are 200-400?mg/day in two divided doses for lacosamide, 800-1200?mg/day once daily for eslicarbazepine acetate, and 600-1200?mg/day in three divided doses for retigabine. In phase III, randomized, double-blind, adjunctive therapy trials, responder rates (proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency vs baseline) at the highest approved dose were comparable for the three drugs (eslicarbazepine acetate: 37-43% vs 13-20% for placebo; lacosamide: 38-41% vs 18-26% for placebo; retigabine: 33-44% vs 16-18% for placebo). The adverse events most commonly reported with active treatment compared with placebo included dizziness, diplopia and nausea for lacosamide; dizziness, somnolence and nausea for eslicarbazepine acetate; and dizziness, somnolence and fatigue for retigabine. The role of these agents in the treatment algorithm will be increasingly defined as clinical experience accumulates. At present, their use is largely restricted to the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization, in adults with epilepsy who failed to achieve seizure freedom after having tried two or more first-line agents.     

Emerging drugs for partial onset seizures

Importance of the field: Patients with epilepsy have recurrent unproved seizures. Epilepsy is common, with a prevalence range that centers at around 1%. Patients with epilepsy can have a poor quality of life and suffer significant social stigma. Despite the availability of a large number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) including standard and newer ones, a significant percentage of patients with epilepsy remain poorly controlled.

Areas covered in this review: In this review, we briefly summarize data on the available AEDs, then present current information on the emerging AEDs, including their chemical structure, pharmacology, mechanism of action, and efficacy and adverse event profile in clinical trials. The AEDs included are rufinamide, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, retigabine, brivaracetam, ganaxolone, stiripentol and carisbamate. Most of the literature related to these AEDs was published in the past 5 years.

What the reader will gain: The reader will become familiar with the pharmacology of emerging AEDs and the results of clinical trials with these AEDs. The reader will also be able to assess the advantages of AEDs and their potential respective places in the treatment of epilepsy.

Take home message: The emerging AEDs offer predominantly improved pharmacokinetics and tolerability and occasionally new mechanisms of action. They will probably have a modest impact on drug-resistant epilepsy.     

The efficacy and tolerability of perampanel and other recently approved anti-epileptic drugs for the treatment of refractory partial onset seizure: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives:

This paper compares the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) relative to other recently approved anti-epileptic drug (AEDs) – lacosamide (LCS), retigabine (RTG), and eslicarbazepine (ESL) for the adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization and specifically in the secondary generalization subgroup.     

儿童抗癫痫药物治疗药物监测

抗癫痫药物（AEDs）是治疗癫痫的主要药物,现有27种抗癫痫药物,这使得治疗药物监测（TDM）的应用越来越广泛,同时,抗癫痫药物也是进行TDM最常见的药物。第一代抗癫痫药物卡马西平、苯巴比妥、苯妥英钠、乙琥胺、扑米酮、丙戊酸在TDM方面积累了很多经验,现在TDM将更多地应用于新的抗癫痫药物如醋酸艾司利卡西平、非氨酯、加巴喷丁、拉科酰胺、拉莫三嗪、左乙拉西坦、奥卡西平、吡仑帕奈、哌拉西坦、普瑞巴林、瑞替加滨、卢非酰胺、司替戊醇、噻加宾、托吡酯、氨己烯酸和唑尼沙胺。本文通过对样本类型、样本的采集和处理、参考范围的概念进行综述,旨在为儿童抗癫痫用药的药物监测提供依据。     

Pharmacological management of epilepsy: recent advances and future prospects

There is still a need for new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as the clinical efficacy, tolerability, toxicity or pharmacokinetic properties of existing AEDs may not be satisfactory. One new AED has recently been approved (rufinamide in 2007) and six others are in late-stage development (phase III and onwards) [brivaracetam, carisbamate, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, retigabine and stiripentol]. The purpose of this review is to provide updated data on proposed mechanisms of action, efficacy and tolerability on these new AEDs, and to discuss the rationale for their development and possible advantages compared with existing treatment, based on recent publications and MEDLINE searches.Rufinamide, brivaracetam and stiripentol have been given the status of orphan drugs. Rufinamide was approved in Europe in 2007 for the use in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Brivaracetam has gained orphan status for development in progressive and symptomatic myoclonic seizures in Europe and the US, respectively. Stiripentol has gained orphan status in children with Dravet's syndrome and pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. All of these drugs demonstrate efficacy as adjunctive therapy in partial seizures. Three of the drugs are derivatives of existing AEDs: brivaracetam is a derivative of levetiracetam with improved affinity for the target molecule; carisbamate is a derivative of felbamate with improved tolerability; and eslicarbazepine is a derivative of carbamazepine with less interaction potential and no auto-induction. Lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide and stiripentol are new compounds, unrelated to other AEDs.Further investigation and development of new broad-spectrum drugs is important for improved treatment of patients with epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders.     

Chemical properties of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)

Between 1990 and 2011 the following fifteen new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were approved: eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. These AEDs (except felbamate) offer appreciable advantages in terms of their favorable pharmacokinetics, improved tolerability and lower potential for drug interactions. All AEDs introduced after 1990 that are not second generation drugs (with the exception of vigabatrin and tiagabine) were developed empirically (sometimes serendipitously) utilizing mechanism-unbiased anticonvulsant animal models. The empirical nature of the discovery of new AEDs in the last three decades coupled with their multiple mechanisms of action explains their diverse chemical structures. The availability of old and new AEDs with various activity spectra and different tolerability profiles enables clinicians to better tailor drug choice to the characteristics of individual patients. With fifteen new AEDs having entered the market in the past 20years the antiepileptic market is crowded. Consequently, epilepsy alone is not attractive in 2011 to the pharmaceutical industry even though the clinical need of refractory epilepsy remains unmet. Due to this situation, future design of new AEDs must also have a potential in non-epileptic CNS disorders such as neuropathic pain, migraine prophylaxis and bipolar disorder or fibromyalgia as demonstrated by the sales revenues of pregabalin, topiramate and valproic acid. This review analyzes the effect that the emerging knowledge on the chemical properties of the old AEDs starting from phenobarbital (1912) has had on the design of subsequent AEDs and new therapeutics as well as the current approach to AED discovery.     

Third-generation antiepileptic drugs: mechanisms of action,pharmacokinetics and interactions

This review briefly summarizes the information on the molecular mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic profiles and drug interactions of novel (third-generation) antiepileptic drugs, including brivaracetam, carabersat, carisbamate, DP-valproic acid, eslicarbazepine, fluorofelbamate, fosphenytoin, ganaxolone, lacosamide, losigamone, pregabalin, remacemide, retigabine, rufinamide, safinamide, seletracetam, soretolide, stiripentol, talampanel, and valrocemide. These novel antiepileptic drugs undergo intensive clinical investigations to assess their efficacy and usefulness in the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy.     

New antiepileptic drugs that are second generation to existing antiepileptic drugs

In the last decade, 10 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced that offer appreciable advantages in terms of their favourable pharmacokinetics, improved tolerability and lower potential for drug interactions. However, despite the large therapeutic range of old and new AEDs, ～ 30% of the patients with epilepsy are still not seizure free and, consequently, there is a substantial need to develop new AEDs. The new AEDs currently in development can be divided into two categories: drugs with completely new chemical structures such as lacosamide (formally harkoseride), retigabine, rufinamide and talampanel; and drugs that are derivatives or analogues of existing AEDs that can be regarded as second-generation or follow-up compounds of established AEDs. This article focuses on the second category and thus critically reviews the following second-generation compounds: eslicarbazepine acetate or BIA-2-093 and 10-hydroxy carbazepine (carbamazepine derivatives); valrocemide and NPS 1776 (isovaleramide; valproic acid derivatives); pregabalin and XP13512 (gabapentin derivatives); brivaracetam (ucb 34714) and seletracetam (ucb 44212; levetiracetam derivatives); and fluorofelbamate (a felbamate derivative). In addition, a series of valproic acid derivatives that are currently in preclinical stage has also been evaluated because some lead compounds of this series have a promising potential to become new antiepileptics and CNS drugs. For any of these follow-up compounds to become a successful second generation to an existing AED, it has to be more potent, safer and possess favourable pharmacokinetics, including low potential for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions.     

New antiepileptic drugs that are second generation to existing antiepileptic drugs

In the last decade, 10 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced that offer appreciable advantages in terms of their favourable pharmacokinetics, improved tolerability and lower potential for drug interactions. However, despite the large therapeutic range of old and new AEDs, approximately 30% of the patients with epilepsy are still not seizure free and, consequently, there is a substantial need to develop new AEDs. The new AEDs currently in development can be divided into two categories: drugs with completely new chemical structures such as lacosamide (formally harkoseride), retigabine, rufinamide and talampanel; and drugs that are derivatives or analogues of existing AEDs that can be regarded as second-generation or follow-up compounds of established AEDs. This article focuses on the second category and thus critically reviews the following second-generation compounds: eslicarbazepine acetate or BIA-2-093 and 10-hydroxy carbazepine (carbamazepine derivatives); valrocemide and NPS 1776 (isovaleramide; valproic acid derivatives); pregabalin and XP13512 (gabapentin derivatives); brivaracetam (ucb 34714) and seletracetam (ucb 44212; levetiracetam derivatives); and fluorofelbamate (a felbamate derivative). In addition, a series of valproic acid derivatives that are currently in preclinical stage has also been evaluated because some lead compounds of this series have a promising potential to become new antiepileptics and CNS drugs. For any of these follow-up compounds to become a successful second generation to an existing AED, it has to be more potent, safer and possess favourable pharmacokinetics, including low potential for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions.     

The adverse-effect profile of lacosamide

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Lacosamide has been used in epilepsy patients in the United States, Europe and Asia since it was approved by the FDA in 2008. Many patients have benefited from this drug as a new generation of sodium channel blocker. With the worldwide use of this drug, its adverse effects have gradually emerged, especially some rare adverse events.

Areas covered: The present review aims to summarize the adverse effects of lacosamide reported in the literature in recent years to promote the safe clinical application of the drug.

Expert opinion: In more than 10 years of experience in drug usage, adverse reactions of lacosamide have also been gradually discovered. The review showed that lacosamide is safe and effective in antiepileptic treatment, and its common side effects are dizziness, headache, drowsiness, diplopia, and cardiovascular abnormalities. Skin rashes, hematotoxicity and heart damage, psychological symptoms and suicide risk have also been reported and emphasized.     

Investigational small molecules in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of epilepsy

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of affected persons. Despite advances in research, nearly a third of patients have refractory or pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Even though numerous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been approved over the past decade, there are no agents that halt the development of epilepsy. Thus, new and improved AEDs to prevent these conditions are necessary.

Areas covered: We highlight recent advances in new and innovative drugs for epilepsy disorders. We review three small molecule drugs in phase II clinical trials: Cannabidivarin, BGG492 (Selurampanel) and Ganaloxone.

Expert opinion: The full potential of Cannabidivarin will be realized by testing in other types of treatment-resistant seizures; if they are beneficial, larger phase III clinical trials would probably be undertaken in the same patient population. About BGG492, the challenge will be to find ‘superselective’ AMPAR antagonists targeting only calcium-permeable receptors, with specific mechanisms, that may be attractive partners for drugs in polytherapy. Moreover, there is anew interest surrounding Ganaloxone because of a new submicron formulation that improves its absorption and pharmacokinetic profile, but new studies are necessary before progressing. Further clinical innovations will define the future for these small molecule-type drugs in epilepsy therapeutics.     

Novel approaches to anticonvulsant drug discovery

Introduction: The history of epilepsy dates back to 2000 BC. Yet, it was not until 1912 that the activity of the first antiepileptic, phenobarbital was discovered by accident. After this discovery, the next antiepileptic drugs to be discovered (phenytoin and primidone) were based on the phenobarbital's structure. Then, in 1960, carbamazepine was developed empirically, while in 1962, valproate demonstrated anticonvulsant activity against experimental seizures. The next antiepileptic drugs synthesized were either modifications of the existing drugs (such as oxcarbazepine and pregabalin) or completely novel chemical structures (lacosamide, perampanel and retigabine).

Areas covered: The present paper briefly refers to the history of epilepsy and development of antiepileptic drugs. Further, the paper provides a discussion on the antiepileptogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs in terms of the constant percentage of epileptic patients with refractory seizures. The authors also review the likely factors involved in the false refractoriness (such as through the use of caffeine-containing beverages and smoking). Finally, the authors consider future directions in the search of novel antiepileptic drugs.

Expert opinion: In spite of the considerable number of newer antiepileptic drugs, the number of drug-resistant epileptic patients remains unchanged. This may be rather an indication of the suitability of the currently available discovery procedures for effective antiepileptic drugs in the whole population of epileptic patients. The authors, however, believe that it is likely that models of mimic chronic epilepsy will help bridge the gaps and aid in the discovery of novel antiepileptic drugs – ones that can effectively modify the course of the disease.     

Eslicarbazepine acetate: a new option for the treatment of focal epilepsy

Background: Epilepsy is a neurological condition with an increased probability of seizure occurrence through time. Although many anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) exist, they fail to treat seizures in 30% of patients with epilepsy. For these patients, new AEDs potentially more efficacious and safe are developed. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy. Methods: A review of the literature was carried out using PubMed central. A direct contact with the drug manufacturer and developer was made. Results/conclusion: ESL is an AED that acts by inhibiting voltage-gated sodium channels. It has proved efficacious in the treatment of patients with refractory focal-onset epilepsy with a good safety profile. Evaluation of its use for treating other epileptic syndromes and its role as an initial treatment option for patients with epilepsy is warranted.     

治疗癫痫新药醋酸艾司利卡西平研究进展

查阅国内外关于醋酸艾司利卡西平治疗癫痫的最新文献。文献结果表明,醋酸艾司利平口服吸收快、半衰期长、药物动力学呈线性,无明显的药物相互关系。与卡马西平、奥卡西平相比较,醋酸艾司利平治疗效果更加显著。     

Pharmacotherapy for children and adolescents with epilepsy

Introduction: Childhood epilepsies are the most frequent neurological problems that occur in children. Despite the introduction of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) 25 – 30% of children with epilepsy remain refractory to medical therapy.

Areas covered: This review aims to highlight the main published data on the treatment of childhood epilepsy. The electronic database, PubMed, and abstract proceedings were used to identify studies. The aim of antiepileptic therapy should be to provide complete seizure control, if possible without the burden of any side effect. Since 1993, new agents have been approved for use as an antiepileptic. Although there are few published data (especially in pediatric populations) to establish that the second-generation AEDs are more efficacious than the older AEDs, they appear to have better tolerability.

Expert opinion: Old AEDs are efficacious agents that continue to play a major role in the current treatment of epilepsy. These agents actually remain the first-line treatment for many specific seizure types or epileptic syndromes. The new AEDs were initially approved as adjunct agents and – subsequently – as monotherapy for various seizure types in the adult and children. Despite these improvements, few AEDs are now considered to be a first-choice for the treatment of epilspsy in children.     

Eslicarbazepine acetate in epilepsies with focal and secondary generalised seizures: systematic review of current evidence

Introduction: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for adjunctive treatment in adults, children, and adolescents with focal-onset seizures. Recently ESL was approved for initial monotherapy in adults. The intention of this article is to review current evidence for ESL and to summarise its pharmacological profile in comparison to other AEDs of the dibenzazepine group.

Areas covered: We performed a systematic literature search in electronic databases (MEDLINE database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Excerpta Medica dataBASE) using a combined search strategy including the following keywords: eslicarbazepine, epilepsy and seizure. The search was performed from 2000 until December 2017. Using a standardised assessment form, information on the study design, methodological framework, data sources and efficacy and adverse events attributed to ESL were extracted from each publication and systematically reported.

Expert commentary: ESL is an effective, safe and well tolerated third-generation AED for the treatment of focal epilepsies. During therapy, especially serum sodium levels and possible interactions with other substances have to be monitored. As of yet, long-term experience is still needed to make severe late-occurring adverse events unlikely and to obtain data regarding its use in pregnancy.     

Pharmacotherapy for tonic–clonic seizures

Introduction: Occurrence of generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCS) is one of the most important risk factors of seizure-related complications and comorbidities in patients with epilepsy. Their prevention is therefore an important aspect of therapeutic management both in idiopathic generalized epilepsies and in focal epilepsies.

Areas covered: It has been shown that the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) varies across epilepsy syndromes, with some AEDs efficacious against focal seizures with secondary GTCS (sGTCS) but aggravating primary GTCS (pGTCS). In patients with pGTCS, evidence-based data support the preferential use of valproic acid, lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate. In patients with sGTCS, all AEDs approved in the treatment of focal epilepsies might be used.

Expert opinion: Both in pGTCS and sGTCS, additional data are required, specifically to inform about the relative efficacy of AEDs in relation to each other. Although valproic acid might be the most efficacious drug in idiopathic generalized epilepsies, it should be avoided in women of childbearing age due to its safety profile. In patients with sGTCS, AEDs for which the impact on this seizure type has been formally evaluated and which have demonstrated greater efficacy than placebo might preferentially be used, such as lacosamide, perampanel and topiramate.     

Retigabine: the newer potential antiepileptic drug

Retigabine represents an antiepileptic drug possessing a completely different mechanism of action when compared to the existing classical and newer antiepileptic drugs. In the therapeutic range, retigabine enhances potassium currents, very likely via destabilization of a closed conformation or stabilization of the open conformation of the potassium Kv7.2–7.3 channels. There are also data indicating that this drug may be a GABA enhancer. Kainate-induced status epilepticus in rats resulted in massive apoptosis in the pyriform cortex and hippocampal area – retigabine inhibited neurodegeneration only in the former brain structure. The metabolism of retigabine has nothing to do with cytochrome P450 enzymes and the drug undergoes glucuronidation and acetylation. Randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter studies have shown that retigabine produced a considerable improvement as an add-on drug in patients with partial drug-resistant epilepsy. The most prominent adverse effects due to retigabine combined with the existing antiepileptic treatment were dizziness, somnolence and fatigue. The preclinical data indicate that this antiepileptic drug may possibly be applied in patients with neuropathic pain and affective disorders. Initial clinical data suggest that retigabine may be also effective in Alzheimer’s disease or stroke.