Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

INTRODUCTION: Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes in the acute phase and in long-term management. Over the last few years, new antiplatelet drugs have been developed and the therapeutic landscape has rapidly evolved. AREAS COVERED: We review the available evidence and most recent data concerning all of the principal classes of antiplatelet agents, including aspirin, thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as well the impact of the new drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor and the available data concerning cangrelor, elinogrel and PAR-1 inhibitors (still under development). EXPERT OPINION: This review considers the management of antiplatelet therapy in the light of recent advances, highlighting how to identify patients who will receive the greatest benefit from the older and newer agents, and underscoring the importance of carefully balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding in order to improve clinical outcomes. Finally, the paper discusses the potential role of functional and genetic tests in guiding the choice of antiplatelet therapy in a future perspective of 'personalised medicine'.     

Developments in antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes and considerations for long-term management

ABSTRACT

Objective: This article reviews the currently available antiplatelet therapies and emerging investigational drugs in the treatment of acutecoronary syndrome (ACS), and considerations for primary and secondary prevention in the long-term management of ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Research design and methods: Primary studies and reviews in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966–2008) using the terms ‘acute coronary syndrome’, ‘antiplatelet’, ‘aspirin’, ‘long-term management’, ‘P2Y₁₂ receptor’, and ‘thienopyridine’. Additional references were obtained by searching the reference lists of the identified articles. Articles were included if they were recently published and pertinent, patient-focused, and authors were recognized as leaders in the field. Current review is limited by literature search on single database.

Results: Platelets play a major role in atherogenesis and the formation of thrombi, the main events in the pathogenesis of ACS. Although aspirin is an effective antiplatelet agent, efficacy and safety data from a number of randomized clinical trials on atherothrombotic disease support the use of dual antiplatelet therapies such as aspirin and thienopyridines over single antiplatelet therapy for ACS and up to 1?year following ACS. Antiplatelet agents reduce, but do not eliminate, ischemic events after ACS due, in part, to variable individual response (or resistance) in antiplatelet agents, non-compliance, progression of atherosclerosis, modest inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) levels and other factors. Several antiplatelet agents, including novel P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonists and thrombin-receptor antagonists, are currently under investigation for ACS and primary and secondary prevention in the long-term management of patients undergoing PCI.

Conclusions: Current antiplatelet therapies have clinical benefits such as reducing immediate and long-term cardiovascular risk, but substantial residual risk remains indicating a need for new therapeutic agents. Additional large randomized trials are necessary to determine the most appropriate treatment regimens for ACS patients.     

Current immunosuppressive treatment after kidney transplantation

Introduction: Since 1995, several immunosuppressive drugs have entered the field of organ transplantation: tacrolimus, mycophenolate and the mTOR-inhibitors. Now treating physicians have a choice.

Areas covered: The authors review the important studies on immunosuppressive drugs used at present after kidney transplantation, published in the last three decades. This review also discusses the available evidence for selecting one of the calcineurin inhibitors, antiproliferative agents and induction therapy. Interesting new drugs are discussed briefly.

Expert opinion: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are considered, especially in de novo transplantation, to be the most effective maintenance drugs to prevent acute rejection. Combining CNI with mycophenolate or an mTOR-inhibitor has made it possible to reduce CNI dose and diminish nephrotoxicity. Uniform treatment regimes according to guidelines are useful but should leave room for adjustment to the needs of individual patients. Longer follow-up studies are needed to decide on the optimal maintenance treatment.     

Emerging antithrombotic drugs for acute coronary syndrome

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses acute myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina. Activation of platelets and coagulation cascade plays a central role in the development of ACS. Over the past decade, there have been substantial improvements in the strategies for secondary prevention of ACS, including the development of more potent oral antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor. However, therapies with even better efficacy and safety profiles and more rapid onset and offset of action would be desirable.

Areas covered: This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available antithrombotic agents and describes the findings from recent clinical trials of three novel agents; cangrelor (an intravenous P2Y12 receptor antagonist), vorapaxar (protease-activated receptor-1 inhibitor) and rivaroxaban (an oral factor Xa inhibitor).

Expert opinion: Cangrelor appears more promising than clopidogrel when a very rapid onset and reversal of antiplatelet effect is needed. Vorapaxar in addition to standard oral antiplatelet therapy was effective in patients with prior MI, but was not safe in patients with a prior stroke. Low dose rivaroxaban decreased cardiovascular events and mortality in patients post-ACS compared to placebo, although bleeding was increased.     

Inhibiting PAR-1 in the prevention and treatment of atherothrombotic events

Importance of the field: Aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of thromboxane A₂ production, in combination with clopidogrel, an inhibitor of PY₁₂ ADP platelet receptors, represents the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, the increased risk of bleeding and the recurrence of thrombotic events represent substantial limitations.

Areas covered in this review: The inhibition of protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1, is the target for novel antiplatelet drugs, which showed a good safety profile in preclinical studies. The drugs most developed are vorapaxar (SCH530348) and atopaxar (E5555), which will be further evaluated in ongoing Phase III and II clinical trials respectively.

What the reader will gain: This review is focused on the current knowledge of PAR-1 antagonists, analyzing the pharmacological and early phase clinical investigation findings on these new drugs.

Take home message: The PAR-1 receptor offers a new target for the inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Preliminary results showed the good safety profile of these new agents. The results of the Phase III ongoing trials will provide important clinical insight into the blockade of thrombin-induced platelet activation.     

Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Introduction: Coronary thrombosis is a frequent cause of death and myocardial infarction most often explained by superimposition of a platelet-rich thrombus on existing coronary artery disease. Therefore, antiplatelet drugs are essential in the treatment and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and during percutaneous coronary intervention. Several novel antiplatelet drugs are now available.

Areas covered: For several years, aspirin and clopidogrel remained the cornerstone of treatment for ACS. However, prasugrel and ticagrelor have a more consistent, faster-acting and more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel, which translates into improved clinical outcomes, although at the expense of an increased bleeding risk. Importantly, some patients experience cardiovascular events despite current antiplatelet treatment, because platelet activation may occur via pathways not inhibited by these agents. Therefore, improved antiplatelet strategies are warranted.

Expert opinion: Despite undisputable benefits of current antiplatelet strategies, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse thrombotic events, although clinical outcomes have been improved with new oral P2Y₁₂ antagonists. New drugs have been developed, including intravenous P2Y₁₂ antagonists and oral antagonist targeting the protease-activated receptor-1 platelet activation pathway stimulated by thrombin. This review provides an overview of current and novel antiplatelet strategies and also discusses unmet needs related to antiplatelet therapy for ACS.     

The DNA helicase–primase complex as a target for herpes viral infection

Introduction: The Herpesviridae are responsible for debilitating acute and chronic infections, and some members of this family are associated with human cancers. Conventional anti-herpesviral therapy targets the viral DNA polymerase and has been extremely successful; however, the emergence of drug-resistant virus strains, especially in neonates and immunocompromised patients, underscores the need for continued development of anti-herpes drugs. In this article, we explore an alternative target for antiviral therapy, the HSV helicase/primase complex.

Areas covered: This review addresses the current state of knowledge of HSV DNA replication and the important roles played by the herpesvirus helicase– primase complex. In the last 10 years several helicase/primase inhibitors (HPIs) have been described, and in this article, we discuss and contrast these new agents with established inhibitors.

Expert opinion: The outstanding safety profile of existing nucleoside analogues for α-herpesvirus infection make the development of new therapeutic agents a challenge. Currently used nucleoside analogues exhibit few side effects and have low occurrence of clinically relevant resistance. For HCMV, however, existing drugs have significant toxicity issues and the frequency of drug resistance is high, and no antiviral therapies are available for EBV and KSHV. The development of new anti-herpesvirus drugs is thus well worth pursuing especially for immunocompromised patients and those who develop drug-resistant infections. Although the HPIs are promising, limitations to their development into a successful drug strategy remain.     

Review of pharmacoeconomic evaluation of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy

Introduction: Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet agent widely prescribed for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and it is activated by the CYP enzyme system to active metabolite. CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) allele(s) affect the responsiveness of clopidogrel, but not the new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor). We reviewed the pharmacoeconomic studies on genotype-guided use of new antiplatelet agents.

Areas covered: A literature search was conducted between the period of 2000 and 2014. Seven studies including cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit analyses of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients were reviewed. Genotype-guided prasugrel was found to be cost-effective when compared with universal antiplatelet therapy in four studies. Three studies showed genotype-guided ticagrelor to be cost-effective in ACS patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and universal ticagrelor to be cost-effective in ACS patients. Drug cost of antiplatelet agents and relative risk of the new antiplatelet versus clopidogrel for clinical events were common influential factors of cost-effectiveness analyses.

Expert opinion: All studies in the present review focused on selecting antiplatelet agents for carriers of CYP2C19 LOF allele(s). Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided use of antiplatelets was demonstrated in high-risk ACS patients.     

Clopidogrel hydrogen sulphate for atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac rhythm abnormality with a considerable cardiovascular disease burden worldwide. It is an independent major risk factor for stroke. Stroke prevention with anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents has been an important area of clinical research. Warfarin is the most widely used antithrombotic therapy for stroke prophylaxis for last several years, and now dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) is more effective than warfarin in stroke prevention in individuals at increased of stroke. In addition, several studies have evaluated the efficacy of clopidogrel for stroke prophylaxis either alone or in combination with aspirin.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the key findings of the trials looking at the efficacy of clopidogrel in stroke prevention. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. The trials that evaluated the efficacy of clopidogrel in preventing atherothrombotic events or stroke were also included.

Expert opinion: Clopidogrel prevents more vascular events, including stroke, in patients with a recent myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral vascular disease than aspirin. Combination of clopidogrel and aspirin provides a greater reduction of stroke than aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy, but at an increased risk of bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) is inferior to warfarin in primary stroke prevention for patient with atrial fibrillation and thus should be considered for stroke prophylaxis only in patients ineligible for warfarin. However, with the advent of newer agents, like direct thrombin inhibitors and Factor Xa inhibitors, the role of antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation remains unclear.     

Thrombin receptor antagonism –the potential of antiplatelet medication SCH 530348

Importance of the field: Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Platelet activation and subsequent thrombus formation play a central role in disease progression and development of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite widespread use of single and dual antiplatelet therapies in atherothrombotic disease, ischemic complications remain common. Therefore, the need exists for new antiplatelet agents that are more effective, but with acceptable safety profiles (i.e., do not increase risk of bleeding). Antiplatelet agents available at present are effective in blocking the cyclo-oxygenase, ADP-mediated and final common (IIb/IIIa receptor) pathways for platelet activation. Recently, there has been more interest in inhibition of the proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), which blocks thrombin-mediated platelet activation.

Areas covered in this review: This review covers the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and development of the new PAR₁ antagonist, SCH 530348 in a review of all publications relevant to the topic over the last 10 years. Phase II clinical trials indicate that addition of this agent to current antiplatelet regimens may provide additional antithrombotic protection without an increase in bleeding. Results of the ongoing Phase III trials, examining the use of SCH 530348 in patients with ACS and for secondary prevention of ischemic events are anxiously awaited.

What the reader will gain: The review is a summary of all pharmacologic properties and current clinical data available on the PAR1 antagonist SCH 530348. The readers will be introduced to its novel mechanism of action, advantages over current antiplatelet agents and potential future applications should ongoing clinical trials confirm its efficacy in reducing platelet activity.

Take home message: SCH 530348 is a new, orally administered antiplatelet agent that blocks the protease-activated thrombin receptor on the platelet. Early clinical data indicate that it is associated with a lower risk of bleeding. However, its efficacy in improving clinical outcomes in patients with coronary disease remains to be confirmed in ongoing Phase III clinical trials.     

The pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet compounds in thrombosis treatment

Introduction: As it is importance to understand the involvement of platelets in the initiation and propagation of thrombosis, antiplatelet drugs have come to the forefront of atherothrombotic disease treatment. Dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel has its benefits, but it also has its limitations with regard to its pharmacologic properties and adverse effects. For these reasons, within the last decade or so, the investigation of novel antiplatelet agents has prospered.

Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the unique pharmacodynamic properties of several antiplatelet drugs with their possible potential molecular of mechanisms on inhibiting platelet aggregation.

Expert opinion: Considering multiple synergetic pathways of platelet activation and their close interplay with coagulation, the current treatment strategies are not only based on platelet inhibition, they also rely on the attenuation of procoagulant activity, inhibition of thrombin generation, and enhancement of clot dissolution. Current guidelines recommend various antiplatelet agents in addition to aspirin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. The advantages of these agents, as repute mortality, may be associated with off-target effects of the drug. Hence, further studies are required to facilitate the physician’s choice of the most appropriate antiplatelet agents for each patient for thrombosis treatment.     

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat liver cancer

Importance of the field: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although patients with early-stage disease have a good prognosis, there has been no effective therapy available for those with advanced disease. Despite the death risk of patients with advanced HCC being reduced with sorafenib therapy, many patients eventually turn out to be refractory to this therapy. Thus, treatment of HCC remains an urgent health concern.

Areas covered in this review: Recent improvement in understanding the pathophysiology of HCC at the molecular level has fostered the development of molecular targeted therapies that specifically block the disrupted pathways.

What the reader will gain: This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical data from 2004 to 2009 on the efficacy and safety of the emerging drug for the treatment of HCC, including small molecule inhibitors (erlotinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, vandetanib, cediranib, brivanib and dovitinib) and the rationale for combination therapies for patients with advanced HCC.

Take home message: Understanding the mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy of these new agents and new methods of combining these drugs may help prolong overall survival of patients with HCC and reduce disease recurrence after surgery or ablative therapies.     

Ticagrelor for the treatment of arterial thrombosis

Importance of the field: High platelet reactivity has been linked to recurrent ischemic events in patients treated with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy, in patients with arterial diseases and particularly in patients treated with coronary artery stenting. The limitations of clopidogrel have served as a major rationale for the development of new P2Y₁₂ blockers that have superior pharmacodynamic profiles uninfluenced by concomitant therapies or specific genotypes. Ticagrelor is the first direct-acting reversibly binding oral P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist. Extensive Phase II investigations have addressed the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety-related properties of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. The recently completed PLATO trial demonstrated promise for ticagrelor as a major treatment strategy for a wide spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Ticagrelor is now being reviewed by the FDA as a P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker to treat patients with coronary artery disease and, once accepted, will be in widespread use as an antiplatelet agent. Thus, it is both appropriate and timely to review available data and provide a comprehensive review of ticagrelor.

Areas covered in this review: We discuss the rationale for the development of ticagrelor, a reversible and potent P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker. The data regarding ticagrelor based on preclinical and clinical studies are examined. We researched articles about ‘AZD6140’ and ‘ticagrelor’ in PubMed from 2006 to 2010 and also reviewed data presented at recent cardiology meetings.

What the reader will gain: This is an updated and comprehensive review of ticagrelor. The advantages and disadvantages of ticagrelor and available P2Y₁₂ receptor blockers such as clopidogrel and prasugrel are discussed, thus providing a clear picture to readers.

Take home message: Ticagrelor has an important role as an antiplatelet agent in the settings of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention and once accepted will be in widespread use.     

New directions for pharmacotherapy in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome

Introduction: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Several landmark trials, followed by a widespread introduction of new agents, have significantly improved ACS outcomes in recent years. However, despite the use of contemporary therapy, a substantial number of ACS patients continue to suffer from cardiovascular events.

Areas covered: The aim of this review was to summarize available data on innovative drugs and pharmacological strategies that have potential to amend the current ACS therapy. We present the results of recent large clinical trials, as well as insights from ongoing phase III and phase IV studies, exploring the value of new strategies for the improvement of outcomes in ACS.

Expert opinion: More potent platelet inhibition, more profound lipid reduction and possibly anti-inflammatory action are considered to have potential to further reduce the rates of adverse cardiovascular and thrombotic events in ACS patients. ‘Hit fast, hit hard’ approach regarding novel antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy seems attractive, but it has to be considered that these strategies may be associated with increased adverse events rate. Introduction of cangrelor and ezetimibe, and potentially future recognition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies, are likely to alter the landscape of ACS pharmacotherapy.     

Developing drugs for use before,during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a milestone for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Antithrombotic therapy is essential to prevent ischemic complications, including the microvascular no-reflow, while minimizing bleeding events.

Areas covered: This overview discusses available and developing drugs for PCI including anticoagulants, antiplatelets and treatment of no-reflow.

Expert opinion: For years unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the unique anticoagulant to be used before and during PCI. Enoxaparin showed similar efficacy and safety, yet, based on recent trials, bivalirudin has been shown to have some benefits, particularly for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The evidence concerning new anticoagulants is still preliminary, except for new oral anticoagulants, particularly rivaroxaban that showed intriguing findings and is currently under investigation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard of care after PCI, but new developments have recently emerged. Indeed, ticagrelor and prasugrel are currently recommended over clopidogrel due to their significant reduction of ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) whereas clopidogrel remains the choice in stable CAD. Among new agents, vorapaxar and cangrelor showed positive but limited evidence and might be considered at least in selected patients. Conversely, evidence on effective treatments for no-reflow remains limited and would require future dedicated research.     

Comment and reply on: Evaluation of injection force of three insulin delivery pens

Importance of the field: The use of clopidogrel and aspirin has become standard therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stent implantation. However, concern arises because about 25% of subjects are nonresponders to clopidogrel. This nonresponsiveness is associated with a threefold increase in adverse outcomes. Clopidogrel resistance is multifactorial, but genetic polymorphisms in clopidogrel's metabolic activation (e.g., cytochrome P450 2C19) and drug–drug interactions at this level (e.g., between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel) are both associated with decreased clopidogrel efficacy. Despite all PPIs being potent inhibitors of CYP2C19, evidence about their clinical impact is controversial.

Areas covered in this review: Pharmacogenomic and pharmacokinetic aspects of clopidogrel nonresponsiveness were considered in detail.

What the reader will gain: The reader will gain an exhaustive review of the current state of the controversial issues regarding genetic polymorphisms and drug–drug interactions affecting clopidogrel efficacy.

Take home message: It is important to consider clopidogrel resistance in some patients and establish strategies to handle this problem (e.g., genotyping, platelet aggregability tests, new antiplatelet drugs). The combined use of PPIs and clopidogrel is at present regulated by the FDA and EMEA; however, the risk/benefit balance should be made for each patient individually.     

Protein kinase inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) was historically treated with cytokine therapy with a poor outcome. In the last decade, new therapies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or the mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) pathways demonstrated efficacy in mRCC. Protein kinase inhibitors as well as monoclonal antibodies targeting these pathways have become the standard treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the first-line setting and beyond.

Areas covered: This review describes the various Phase III trials concerning protein kinase inhibitors including anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and m-TOR serine/threonine kinase inhibitors, which have demonstrated a benefit in the treatment of mRCC. It focuses on efficacy, safety and management.

Expert opinion: VEGF TKI and m-TOR inhibitors have significantly improved the outcome of mRCC and offer a gain in survival by sequential treatments for the majority of patients. But they induce a particular toxicity profile. An adequate management of each drug and its sequence in treatment is essential to optimise the outcome and preserve the quality of life (QoL) of patients with mRCC. In forthcoming years, pending results should indicate whether VEGF TKI are of interest in an adjuvant setting and if new drugs targeting will challenge the current standard guidelines in the metastatic setting.     

Emerging drugs for psoriatic arthritis

Importance of the field: The socioeconomic burden of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is considerable and not different from that of rheumatoid arthritis. Current treatment options do not always allow reaching the therapeutic objectives consisting of the remission of symptoms and prevention of the appearance of damage in the early stage of PsA or the blocking of PsA progression in the established cases.

Areas covered in this review: After reviewing the current treatment choices, we examine the new drugs in clinical Phase II and III trials for PsA up to January 2010. Information was mainly obtained from the network of international clinical trial registries.

What the reader will gain: The current management of PsA includes NSAIDs, corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and anti-TNF-α blocking agents. These last drugs are more effective than traditional DMARDs on symptoms/signs of inflammation, quality of life and function and can inhibit the progression of the structural joint damage. Recent advancement in the knowledge of the immunopathogenesis of PsA has permitted the development of novel drugs including new TNF-α blockers, IL-1, -6, -12, -23 and -17 inhibitors, co-stimulator modulation inhibitors, B-cell depleting agents, small molecules and receptor activator of NF-κB/receptor activator of NF-κB ligand inhibitors.

Take home message: The currently available anti-TNF-α blocking agents have revolutionized the management of PsA. However, there is a need for more effective and safer drugs.     

The safety of clopidogrel

Importance of the field: Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet prodrug widely used in acute coronary syndromes and after intravascular stent placement. Acute or chronic use can cause bleeding, a major adverse effect, which can lead to drug discontinuation or noncompliance with therapy.

Areas covered in this review: The mechanism of action of clopidogrel, safety of different loading doses of clopidogrel, its use as a solitary antiplatelet agent and concomitant use with other antiplatelet agents such as aspirin and warfarin are discussed. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, a rare but important adverse event, has also been reviewed. Literature searches including randomized controlled trials were conducted in Medline.

What the reader will gain: Clinicians will be able to understand the safety profile of using different doses of clopidogrel and the incidence of bleeding when used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet agents.

Take home message: Compared to aspirin, clopidogrel when taken alone causes less severe bleeding and less intracranial hemorrhage. Higher loading dose of clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding. When combined with other antiplatelet agents, risk of bleeding increases, but like any other drug, the risks have to be weighed against potential benefits.