The use of ustekinumab in autoimmune disease

Importance of the field: The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases including psoriasis, autoimmune arthritides and inflammatory bowel disease. With recent advances in our understanding of the immunogenetic pathways involved in the pathogenesis of these conditions, newer, more targeted biologic therapies have been developed. Ustekinumab is an antibody to the common p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, which has been studied in the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis.

Areas covered in this review: This review details the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in all clinical studies to date, using PubMed listed publications and official product websites.

What the reader will gain: Readers will gain a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of action of ustekinuamb, its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile, and its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis.

Take home message: Ustekinumab has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis in Phase III studies, and promising results in Phase II studies in psoriatic arthritis. Efficacy has been shown in Crohn's disease only in non-responders to infliximab. Ustekinumab did not show benefit in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.     

Targeting the IL-23/IL-17 axis for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Introduction: A growing amount of data supporting the pathogenic role of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in inflammatory/autoimmune disorders has provided the rationale to target the system for therapeutic purpose. Several compounds have been and are currently under intense investigation in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) yielding impressive results.

Areas covered: In this review article, we provide an overview of currently available data on the IL-23/IL-17 system as a target for treatment for psoriasis and PsA. We searched MEDLINE for articles on drug therapy for psoriasis and PsA published between 1 January 2010 and 31 May 2015. One of these agents, ustekinumab, has been recently approved for the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, and a number of IL-23/IL-17-targeted compounds under investigation in these diseases.

Expert opinion: As our knowledge of the role of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and PsA deepens, it enables the development of more targeted therapies in the management of these conditions. Early data on IL-23/IL-17 targeting drugs appear promising, although incomplete. Given the key role IL-23/IL-17 in host defence, the safety profile of targeted drugs should be thoroughly assessed in future studies.     

Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab and etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis

Importance of the field: TNF-α inhibitors such as etanercept have been used for psoriasis for years. A fairly well defined efficacy and safety profile has developed. A new biologic agent, ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, has recently been released in the US for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The purpose of this article is to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of ustekinumab and etanercept.

Areas covered in this review: We examined safety and efficacy data regarding ustekinumab and etanercept from clinical reports, a head-to-head trial, review articles, and databases and registries from the last 20 years.

What the reader will gain: Evidence is reviewed about the efficacy for the treatment of psoriasis as well as the safety profiles for both agents, ustekinumab and etanercept.

Take home message: Both drugs have data to confirm efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the short-term. The limited long-term data on the safety profile of ustekinumab requires careful judgment on the clinician's part, weighing well-defined benefits and potential unknown risks.     

Anti-IL17 therapies for psoriasis

Introduction: Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is a proinflammatory cytokine considered to play a significant role in the immunopathogenesis of plaque psoriasis. As a result, focus in clinical trials has undergone a shift towards disease specific targets, with the goals of more effective treatment and reduction in the incidence of serious adverse events.

Areas covered: Two monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and one against the IL-17 receptor (brodalumab) are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Herein, the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of each is reviewed by summarizing the existing literature (found via PubMed database).

Expert commentary: The development and approval of the IL-17 inhibitor agents secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab has expanded psoriatic treatment with effective options, validating the importance of the pro-inflammatory role of IL-17 psoriatic pathophysiology. Biologic treatment options for psoriasis will continue to grow, especially IL-17 and IL-23 related agents, with an increasing specificity of agents to be available in the future.     

Novel approaches to biological therapy for psoriatic arthritis

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Improved understanding of the immunopathogenic mechanisms in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has led to the development of targeted biological therapies, which demonstrate superior clinical efficacy to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). There are currently 3 classes of biological agents that are approved for the treatment of psoriatic disease: tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi), including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol; ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23; and secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A mAb. Other agents are in development. Our growing experience with these medications has revolutionized the approach to disease management in PsA.

Areas covered: This article discusses the rationale for using biological therapies in PsA, highlighting clinical trial evidence that supports the use of these agents. We summarize novel treatment approaches using biological therapies in the management of PsA, including early intervention, targeted therapy, TNFi switching, combination therapy, and tapering or discontinuation of biological therapy. We conclude with a discussion of the importance comorbidities have on selection of therapy.

Expert opinion: The advent of highly effective biological therapies has revolutionized the management of patients with PsA. Growing experience with these agents has led to novel treatment approaches that may improve clinical outcomes for PsA patients.     

Briakinumab

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic, autoimmune, T-cell mediated, inflammatory disease. An improved understanding of the pathogenesis of the autoimmune response has led to the development of targeted biologic therapies. Briakinumab is a human monocolonal antibody that blocks the activity of the cytokines IL-12 and IL-23. Immune dysregulation has been implicated in multiple inflammatory disorders and briakinumab has been investigated for the treatment of psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple sclerosis. Objectives: This review focuses on briakinumab and its use in chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Methods: A literature review was performed, searching Medline and the clinicaltrials.gov database for all articles with the keywords ABT-874, IL-12/IL-23 and psoriasis. Conclusions: Although limited by small sample sizes, length of follow-up, and a lack of direct comparisons with other psoriasis treatments, initial data regarding the safety and efficacy of briakinumab for the treatment of psoriasis is promising. Ongoing Phase III trials may provide additional information regarding the relative efficacy and safety of briakinumab.     

Biologics that inhibit the Th17 pathway and related cytokines to treat inflammatory disorders

Introduction: Advances in the understanding of TNF-α and IL-17 synergistic functions have recently led to the concept that patients who do not respond or who respond inadequately to TNF-α inhibitors may have IL-17-driven diseases, opening up the way for a new class of therapeutic development: Th17-inhibitors.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the central role that the IL-23/Th17 axis plays in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis, highlighting its position as a relevant therapeutic target. In particular, the authors start by giving a brief historical excursus on biologic agent development up until the success of TNF-α inhibitors, and continue with an overview of IL12/23 pathway inhibition. Next, they describe Th17 cell biology, focusing on the role of IL-17 in host defense and in human immune-inflammatory diseases, discussing the use and side effects of IL-17 inhibitors.

Expert opinion: The IL-23/Th17 signaling pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis. Recent data has demonstrated that biologics neutralizing IL-17 (ixekizumab, secukinumab) or its receptor (brodalumab) are highly effective with a positive safety profile in treating moderate to severe psoriasis, offering new treatment possibilities, especially for patients who do not respond adequately to anti-TNF-α therapies.     

Brodalumab in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis

ABSTRACT

Introduction

A number of highly selective biologic therapies that target specific immunological pathways of psoriasis have emerged, including molecules that target interleukin (IL)-17. IL-17 has been identified as a key effector pathogenic cytokine in psoriasis, and validated as a highly effective therapeutic target for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.     

Brodalumab-an IL-17RA monoclonal antibody for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Introduction: IL-17 is a growing target for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Brodalumab is a fully human anti-IL-17RA monoclonal antibody that has been investigated in a range of disease including psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and asthma.

Areas covered: This review aims to summarize up-to-date pharmacological properties of brodalumab and the clinical efficacy and safety data presented in clinical trials. The focus of this review will be on psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis although we will briefly touch on the other indications in which the drug has been studied as we feel it adds to our understanding of the IL-17 pathway and highlights areas where research is still needed.

Expert opinion: Brodalumab has shown good efficacy in psoriasis in small but extended studies with a moderate effect on psoriatic arthritis. Brodalumab studies are clearly negative in rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. The data are equivocal in asthma; however, further studies in this disease are justifiable. The safety profile of this drug thus far is not worrisome although longer studies in more patients are needed.     

Zalutumumab in head and neck cancer

Introduction: Plaque psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that can result in significant physical, psychological and quality of life impairments. Until recently, biologic treatment for psoriasis was limited to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and an interleukin (IL)-12/23 p40 subunit inhibitor. Newly developed biologics targeting the pro-inflammatory IL-17A cytokine have shown success in providing higher levels of clinical efficacy in patients with psoriasis. Secukinumab, a member of this novel class of IL-17 inhibitors, is the latest biologic to receive US FDA approval for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Areas covered: This comprehensive review will cover the pharmacology, efficacy, safety and future role of secukinumab and other IL-17 blockers in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

Expert opinion: While biologics have revolutionized patient care for chronic plaque psoriasis, they are associated with loss of response over time. When treatment failure occurs with existing biologics, physicians are left with few alternative treatment options to offer patients. The introduction of secukinumab has provided an additional therapeutic agent that offers improved skin clearance, better health related quality of life and a favorable side-effect profile.     

New era of biologic therapeutics in atopic dermatitis

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease regulated by genetic and environmental factors. Both skin barrier defects and aberrant immune responses are believed to drive cutaneous inflammation in AD. Existing therapies rely largely on allergen avoidance, emollients and topical and systemic immune-suppressants, some with significant toxicity and transient efficacy; no specific targeted therapies are in clinical use today. As our specific understanding of the immune and molecular pathways that cause different subsets of AD increases, a variety of experimental agents, particularly biologic agents that target pathogenic molecules bring the promise of safe and effective therapeutics for long-term use.

Areas covered: This paper discusses the molecular pathways characterizing AD, the contributions of barrier and immune abnormalities to its pathogenesis, and development of new treatments that target key molecules in these pathways. In this review, we will discuss a variety of biologic therapies that are in development or in clinical trials for AD, perhaps revolutionizing treatment of this disease.

Expert opinion: Biologic agents in moderate to severe AD offer promise for controlling a disease that currently lacks good and safe therapeutics posing a large unmet need. Unfortunately, existing treatments for AD aim to decrease cutaneous inflammation, but are not specific for the pathways driving this disease. An increasing understanding of the immune mechanisms underlying AD brings the promise of narrow targeted therapies as has occurred for psoriasis, another inflammatory skin disease, for which specific biologic agents have been demonstrated to both control the disease and prevent occurrence of new skin lesions. Although no biologic is yet approved for AD, these are exciting times for active therapeutic development in AD that might lead to revolutionary therapeutics for this disease.     

A new class of biologic agents facing the therapeutic paradigm in psoriasis: anti-IL-23 agents.

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease whose pathogenesis is driven by multiple cytokine-mediated pathways. In this immunologic setting, the centrality of the IL-23/IL-17 axis and its therapeutic relevance has emerged.

Areas covered: This review is aimed at collecting preliminary data on IL23p19 blockers developed for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Three agents, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, are currently being tested in phase III trials, while LY2525623 is currently being tested in phase II trials. Treatment with these agents resulted in a marked improvement in disease severity, confirming the pathogenic relevance of IL-23 in psoriasis.

Expert opinion: Selective neutralization of IL-23 is an advantageous strategy for treating psoriasis. Preliminary data from phase II and III trials have shown the capability of this therapeutic class in inducing complete clearance or almost complete clearance in many patients: the highest PASI 90 rates were achieved by guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab in 73.3%, 74% and 77% of cases, respectively. Moreover, the highest PASI 100 rates were achieved in 33%, 14%, and 48% of patients treated with guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, respectively. Further studies are needed to confirm this remarkable efficacy over long-term treatment periods.     

Biological therapies for the treatment of cutaneous wounds: Phase III and launched therapies

Introduction: Normal wound healing mechanisms can be overwhelmed in the setting of complex acute and chronic tissue injury. Biological therapies are designed to augment and/or restore the body's natural wound healing abilities. There are a variety of available and emerging technologies utilizing this approach that have demonstrated the ability to augment wound healing.

Areas covered: In this review, the clinical data on launched and emerging biological therapies for wound healing applications are summarized. The methodologies discussed include biological skin equivalents, growth factors/small molecules and stem cell-based therapies.

Expert opinion: While many products possess convincing clinical data demonstrating their efficacy in comparison to standard treatment options, more robust, controlled studies are needed to determine the relative value among established and emerging biological therapies. Future bioengineering and stem cell-based approaches are of particular interest due to the simultaneous correction of multiple deficiencies present in the nonhealing wound.     

Natural killer–dendritic cell cross-talk in cancer immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment has been revolutionized by the development of highly efficacious biotherapeutics. However, a significant subset of RA patients has persistently active disease and ongoing erosive joint damage despite the available therapies. Sarilumab targets interleukin-6, one of the main cytokines mediating inflammation in RA. Positive results with sarilumab in RA clinical trials support the licensing application currently under review with the US Food and Drug Administration.

Areas covered: The rationale for IL-6 targeting in RA, the pharmacologic properties of sarilumab, and the clinical trial results are reviewed focusing on the pending application for the RA indication. Comparisons with other IL-6 targeting biologics as well as additional potential therapeutic directions are discussed.

Expert opinion: Sarilumab is a highly active therapeutic in patients with RA. While pharmacologic data demonstrate that sarilumab has a higher affinity than tocilizumab for the target receptor, available clinical results suggest that efficacy and adverse event profiles are similar to this other IL-6 blocker, which is currently approved for the treatment of RA. Whether there are other distinct differences or advantages of sarilumab that will support the approval and successful marketing of this drug, over existing therapies, remains to be determined.     

Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder pathogenically mediated by multiple cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17, and TNF. An emerging class of therapeutics that selectively blocks IL-23 has been developed. Among these new agents, risankizumab is now being investigated in phase III clinical trials, and the preliminary data are promising in inducing an excellent clinical response.

Areas covered: This review aims to describe the pathogenic role of IL-23 in psoriasis and to collect clinical data related to the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, an anti-IL-23p19 agent, in the treatment of psoriasis.

Expert opinion: Risankizumab showed high response rates in reaching complete or almost complete clearance of psoriasis. When compared to other similarly effective drugs, it may show some advantages related to its mechanism of action (direct blockade of the main pathogenic pathway), safety (no impact on the immune surveillance against Candida infection), therapeutic regimen (every-12-week injections), and effectiveness in the treatment of immune-mediated psoriasis comorbid conditions, such as psoriatic arthritis and Crohn’s disease.     

Targeted biological therapies for pain

Introduction: Chronic pain is often resistant to currently used drugs. The effect of these is frequently self-limiting, with increasing level of side effects caused by increased doses. Biological pain therapies provide a means to target molecules to specific types of neural cells in spatially limited areas. Targeted biological therapies utilize agents acting at specific sites, or virus or cell vectors allowing expression and secretion of transgenic substances in small anatomical compartments. Biological approaches to treatment of chronic pain may be able to provide greater analgesic efficacy, avoiding many of the limitations associated with current analgesics.

Areas covered: The most important targets and tools for biological therapy of pain. Basic approaches, preclinical trials and the clinical studies successfully completed. The rationale and tools for biological therapies.

Expert opinion: Biological therapy of pain holds great promise and is rapidly developing. Despite the significant numbers of preclinical studies in the last two decades only a single biological agent, the cone snail toxin ziconotide, has been advanced through all stages and licensed for clinical use. Biological therapy of pain is thus here to stay, but will need more substantial proof of efficacy and safety before being widely accepted and routinely used.     

Monoclonal antibody treatments for rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic disease and the most prevalent of all autoimmune disorders. Here we review recent advances in the development and availability of biologic agents with a focus on monoclonal antibody or smaller formats of targeted engineered therapeutics including novel, non-antibody-based therapeutics.

Areas covered: Today an array of biologics blocking either proinflammatory cytokines or lymphocyte activation/survival are available that enable a substantial improvement over conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We review the engineering process of antibody-based biologics, their preclinical and clinical application, and current efforts to treat RA by interfering with B-cell function (notable targets covered are CD20, CD38, B-cell activating factor, transmembrane activator and calcium-modulating and cyclophilin interactor), with T-cell function (CD3, CD4, CD28), with bone erosion (RANKL), and with cytokines or growth factors (tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1 [IL-1], IL-6, IL-17, VEGF). Future treatment choices might encompass the blockade or modulation of danger-associated molecular patterns such as HMGB1, pattern recognition receptors, messenger RNAs or noncoding RNAs, histone acetylation, and inflammasome components.

Expert opinion: Although current therapies can reduce the signs and symptoms of RA for many patients, the quest for a cure (or a more complete blockade of the structural damage) in RA is still ongoing and will need treatment approaches, which are not exclusively confined to blocking a particular cytokine, receptor, or autoreactive B or T cell involved in disease progression. To this end exciting treatment alternatives and drug targets are on the horizon that may become available to patients in the future.     

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a view on effectiveness,clinical practice and toxicity

Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis is a common and often severe chronic joint disorder associated with the skin disease psoriasis (PsO). Treatment options for psoriatic arthritis patients have changed considerably over the last decade with the widespread use of biological therapies, in particular tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Current clinical experience based on large registries and careful observations now allows us to understand the true value of these interventions in daily clinical practice.

Areas covered: Literature searches were performed targeting effectiveness, drug survival, toxicity and safety of biological therapies as well as treatment strategies specifically focused on patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Expert opinion: Tumour necrosis factor inhibition is a powerful and effective option for the treatment of severe psoriatic arthritis. The different available drugs have good survival rates and show an excellent balance between effectiveness and toxicity. Switching of inhibitor is feasible, but treatment changes should be carefully considered. Novel biological therapies are introduced into the market and will further provide better perspectives for the patient. New questions are also emerging: How to handle long-term remission, can biological therapies be successfully stopped and are co-morbidities sufficiently managed? These questions should be addressed for optimal long-term management of a severe chronic disease.     

Ixekizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: up-to-date

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Ixekizumab (an IL-17A antagonist) is a biologic therapeutic licensed for use in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. IL-17 antagonists (also including Secukinumab and Brodalumab) represent a new generation of biologic therapy with rapid and high response rates, quickly becoming a crucial part of the psoriasis treatment armamentarium.

Areas covered: In this review, we describe how IL-17A antagonists disrupt inflammatory cascades in psoriasis and summarize results from clinical trials examining the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab against placebo and comparators.

Expert opinion: Ixekizumab induces a 75% reduction in psoriasis area severity index (PASI 75) in 89% of patients after 12 weeks and after 1 year, PASI 75 is maintained in 80% of patients. Ixekizumab is superior to both etanercept and ustekinumab, however, further comparator trials are needed to determine superiority between newer agents. Network meta-analysis suggests that ixekizumab is one of the most rapid and efficacious agents for treating psoriasis, but ideally more long-term real-world data are needed to determine the persistence of response. Candida may be commonly encountered during treatment and IL-17 agents should be avoided in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Overall, ixekizumab represents an efficacious and well-studied therapeutic that can offer biologic-naïve and bio-failure patients durable disease control.     

Biologic agents in nail psoriasis: efficacy data and considerations

Introduction: Nail psoriasis plays a major role in the overall assessment of psoriatic disease. Four biologic agents are officially labeled for the treatment of moderate to severe, stable plaque psoriasis (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab) and have enriched subsequently the therapeutic armamentarium against psoriatic nails. However, evidence for the efficacy of these agents for nail psoriasis is under investigation.

Areas covered: In this review an effort has been made to summarize evidence regarding the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis. A systemic search for reports of biologic agents in psoriatic patients with nail involvement was carried out (MEDLINE and CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library). Relevant data are thoroughly presented.

Expert opinion: All four biologic agents have shown efficacy on psoriatic nail disease. However, published data are heterogeneous, based on studies assessing the therapeutic efficacy with different scoring indexes and at different time points, depending on the time table of each drug administration. Therefore, the need for consensus on core outcome to be used is mandatory. Additionally, optimization of the scoring systems and the conduction of further trials of high quality and validity could lead to more accurate conclusions on the efficacy of biologic agents in the treatment of nail psoriasis.