Atorvastatin and statins in the treatment of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) affects approximately five million people in the US and survival at 5 years is only 50% despite advances in medical and device therapy. Statins are of novel therapy for these patients, which may be beneficial in both ischemic and non-ischemic HF. In addition to lipid-lowering and anti-atherosclerotic effects, statins demonstrate many non-lipid or pleiotropic effects that could be beneficial in HF. They may inhibit or reverse myocardial remodeling, inhibit inflammation in HF, improve endothelial function and restore autonomic nervous system balance. Numerous observational studies of HF cohorts have linked statin therapy with significantly improved survival. Small prospective clinical studies of atorvastatin and simvastatin in systolic HF are promising, documenting improved ventricular systolic function and decreased inflammatory biomarkers with statin therapy. Definitive recommendations regarding statin therapy in all HF must await the completion of large scale outcome trials of statins in non-ischemic HF.     

Pravastatin attenuates left ventricular remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive mice

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with heart failure have a normal ejection fraction and diastolic dysfunction. However, there are few data available to guide the therapy of these patients. The effects of statins on cardiac remodeling are well documented in animal models and it is reported that statin therapy revealed a survival benefit in patients with diastolic heart failure (DHF). However, the exact mechanisms of statins possibly explaining the decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with DHF have not been elucidated. METHODS: We used 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice, in which angiotensin II was subcutaneously infused for 4 weeks to mimic cardiac remodeling and fibrosis. They were treated with either normal saline or pravastatin in daily doses, which did not lower the serum cholesterol levels and blood pressure. RESULTS: Pravastatin improved diastolic dysfunction in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive mice, which was associated with the amelioration of left ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling. However, statin treatment showed no effect on the increased systolic blood pressure or cholesterol levels by angiotensin II infusion. The cardioprotective effects of pravastatin were closely associated with the downregulation of collagen I, transforming growth factor-beta, matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -3, atrial natriuretic factor, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, ROCK1 gene expression, and the upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of pravastatin on DHF and structural remodeling are through cholesterol- independent mechanism of statins or "pleiotropic" effects of statins involving improving or restoring endothelial function and decreasing vascular inflammation. These findings suggest the potential involvement of ROCK1. Thus, treatment with pravastatin might be beneficial in patients with DHF.     

Non-lipid effects of statins: emerging new indications

Statins are beneficial both in the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic vascular disease and acute events in a broad spectrum of patient subgroups. However, the observed clinical benefit with statin therapy is much greater than expected through the reduction of cholesterol levels alone. Clinical and experimental studies suggested that several antiatherosclerotic effects other than lipid lowering also contribute to the observed benefit of statin therapy. These 'pleiotropic effects' include improvement of endothelial function, antitrombotic actions, plaque stabilization, reduction of the vascular inflammatory process and anti-oxidation. Statins may also exhibit a wide variety of actions other than antiatherosclerotic effects. Recent observational data documented a potential association between statin use and improvement of fracture risk in osteoporosis. Despite the lack of randomized trials, epidemiological and limited clinical data suggested that statins might retard the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Observational data indicated that the progression of aortic stenosis and valvular calcification might be delayed in statin users. In addition, the deterioration of congestive heart failure may be delayed with statins via anti-inflammatory, vascular endothelial and antiatherosclerotic actions. Furthermore, preliminary clinical studies suggested that, by their immunosuppressive actions statins might reduce the incidence of rejection following organ transplantation. Currently, there is not enough evidence to prescribe therapy for such patients. However, ongoing studies are exploring the role of statin therapy for these new indications. This review will discuss several non-lipid effects of statin therapy currently under investigation.     

Effects of statins on blood pressure: a review of the experimental and clinical evidence

The "pleiotropic" effects of statins have been the centre of a considerable research activity. Among the numerous experimental and clinical studies of this field, some focused on the effects of statins on blood pressure (BP), while others reported data on BP together with other parameters. Some of the animal or human studies do not show an association between statin treatment and BP changes, whereas others usually report mild but significant reductions. Among the latter, all clinical studies using ambulatory BP recordings show a significant drop in both systolic and diastolic BP in hypertensive patients. In addition, accumulating evidence has identified a number of statin actions that may be involved in BP lowering. Overall, current evidence suggests that statins can be associated with a mild beneficial effect on BP, but further research is needed to clarify the exact magnitude of this action, as well as its clinical relevance.     

Statin therapy-evidence beyond lipid lowering contributing to plaque stability

Primarily statin drugs inhibit hepatic 3-hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, which is responsible for the reduction in circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Several findings from recent research studies indicate that statins have multiple actions that favorably influence key factors involved in the atherogenic process. These so-called pleiotropic properties affect various aspects of cell function, inflammation, coagulation, and vasomotor activity. These effects are mediated either indirectly through LDL cholesterol reduction or via a direct effect on cellular functions. Such actions may contribute to the early cardiovascular benefit observed in several outcome trials with statin drugs therapy. Although many of the pleiotropic properties of statins may be a class effect, some may be unique to certain agents and account for differences in their pharmacological activity. This review summarise the results of the major outcome trials of statins and non-statins therapy and the possible mechanisms beyond lipid lowering contributing to plaque stability.     

A safety look at currently available statins

In this mini-review, the evidence for safety and efficacy of currently available statins is discussed. Large-scale, long-term clinical studies have documented an outstanding efficacy and safety profile for statin monotherapy when used at pharmacological doses. Non-life-threatening side effects may occur in up to 15% of patients receiving one statin. Sporadic reports show possible adverse effects of statins on nervous system function including mood alterations. More serious side effects may also occur but at much lower rates. Significant elevations in the activity of serum aminotransferase and creatine kinase alone or in combination with muscle pain in statin-treated patients should be taken seriously; under these conditions, monitoring the statin dose or its discontinuation must be considered. Unlike monotherapy, combination therapy is more problematic. Particularly, combination of the statins with gemfibrozil results in higher rates of drug toxicity. Co-administration of statins with other drugs, especially those which may interfere with the cytochrome P450 system, should be considered carefully. Special attention must be paid to the tolerability of the statins in elderly and transplant patients. The safety of statins in children and adolescents has not yet been well-documented, thus, statin therapy is not routinely recommended in this group of hyperlipidaemic subjects. Future clinical studies and surveillance information will warrant long-term safety of each member of this class of lipid-lowering agents.     

A safety look at currently available statins

In this mini-review, the evidence for safety and efficacy of currently available statins is discussed. Large-scale, long-term clinical studies have documented an outstanding efficacy and safety profile for statin monotherapy when used at pharmacological doses. Non-life-threatening side effects may occur in up to 15% of patients receiving one statin. Sporadic reports show possible adverse effects of statins on nervous system function including mood alterations. More serious side effects may also occur but at much lower rates. Significant elevations in the activity of serum aminotransferase and creatine kinase alone or in combination with muscle pain in statin-treated patients should be taken seriously; under these conditions, monitoring the statin dose or its discontinuation must be considered. Unlike monotherapy, combination therapy is more problematic. Particularly, combination of the statins with gemfibrozil results in higher rates of drug toxicity. Co-administration of statins with other drugs, especially those which may interfere with the cytochrome P450 system, should be considered carefully. Special attention must be paid to the tolerability of the statins in elderly and transplant patients. The safety of statins in children and adolescents has not yet been well-documented, thus, statin therapy is not routinely recommended in this group of hyperlipidaemic subjects. Future clinical studies and surveillance information will warrant long-term safety of each member of this class of lipid-lowering agents.     

Inhibitory effect of statins on the proliferation of human breast cancer cells

OBJECTIVE: Long-term hormone therapy in the postmenopause is associated with a moderate increase in cardiovascular and breast cancer risk. Of great concern, therefore, is the question of how women with menopausal symptoms and enhanced cardiovascular risk can be treated. Evidence is growing that an estrogen/statin combination may be a good choice, since this combination seems to elicit additive beneficial effects on the lipid profile and on the vasculature. METHODS: In the present study, the effect of two statins on the proliferation of breast cancer cells in the presence and absence of estradiol was investigated. RESULTS: Atorvastatin and fluvastatin were able to inhibit the proliferation of MCF-7 cells in the absence of estradiol. This effect seems to depend on an apoptotic statin effect which may be mediated by the down-regulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 rather than up-regulation of Fas-L or p53. However, in the presence of estradiol the inhibitory effect of the statins was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that statins may possess anticancerogenic properties concerning the development of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Clinical trials are necessary to prove a beneficial statin effect on breast cancer risk when combined with long-term hormone therapy.     

Statins and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: preoperative and postoperative efficacy and safety

Background: In patients with native coronary artery disease, strong evidence supports the use of statins to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and improve survival. However, for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), statins appear to be underutilized, and concerns have been raised regarding their perioperative safety. Objective: The goal of this systematic review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of statin therapy before and after coronary surgical revascularization. Methods: A systematic review was performed to retrieve relevant articles from the Medline database published between 1987 and January 2009. Results: Administered before CABG, statins have been demonstrated to reduce perioperative mortality, stroke and atrial fibrillation. Preoperative statin therapy also reduces the systemic inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. Following CABG, statins inhibit saphenous vein graft disease and the progression of atherosclerosis in native coronary arteries. In addition, postoperative statins reduce the recurrence of cardiovascular events and improve all-cause mortality. High-intensity lipid reduction to achieve low-density lipoprotein levels to 70 mg/dl may benefit post-CABG patients, but this has yet to be evaluated prospectively. Adverse effects related to perioperative statin therapy seem to be extremely rare, and little data are available to support the practice of withholding statin therapy before or after surgery. Conclusion: Numerous studies have demonstrated that statins improve the outcomes of patients undergoing CABG. The benefits seem to outweigh the risks associated with their use, both in the preoperative and postoperative period. In the absence of contraindications, essentially all CABG patients are candidates for life-long statin therapy that ideally should be started before surgery. The optimal postoperative statin regimen remains unknown and should be the subject of future study.     

Statins exert multiple beneficial effects on patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Statins are an essential component of the therapeutic approach of patients with atherosclerotic disease. Statin use is also associated with improved peri-operative and long-term outcomes in these patients. We aimed to define the role of statin treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures. LITERATURE SEARCH METHOD: We searched Medline for studies assessing the effect of statin treatment on percutaneous interventions. LITERATURE SEARCH RESULTS: Early statin treatment is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Current evidence implies that statin treatment may also play a beneficial role in the management of patients undergoing percutaneous renal artery revascularization and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid angioplasty/stenting and endovascular peripheral arterial interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that statins exert multiple beneficial actions in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions. Future randomized trials are expected to further evaluate the beneficial effects of statins in these procedures.     

Role of Colesevelam in Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Hyperlipidemia is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events; reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the primary target for cholesterol-lowering therapy, lowers the risk for such events. Although bile acid sequestrants were the first class of drugs to show a mortality benefit related to LDL-C lowering, statins are now considered first-line pharmacological therapy for reducing LDL-C levels because of their potency and their remarkable record of successful outcomes studies. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients do not achieve LDL-C goals with statin monotherapy. In addition, because of adverse effects (primarily myopathy), some patients may be unwilling to use or unable to tolerate statin therapy at all or may not tolerate a full therapeutic statin dose. Also, statins may increase risk of new-onset diabetes in patients at high risk for diabetes. Thus, there remains a need for other lipid-lowering drugs to be used in combination with or in place of statins. The purpose of this article is to review available data from the literature on the use of colesevelam, a second-generation bile acid sequestrant, in combination with other lipid-lowering agents. Colesevelam has been studied in combination with statins, niacin, fibrates, and ezetimibe (including some three-drug combinations). An additive reduction in LDL-C was seen with all combinations. Other observed effects of colesevelam in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs include reductions in apolipoprotein (apo) B (with statins, fibrates, ezetimibe, statin plus niacin, or statin plus ezetimibe) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (with statins), and increases in apo A-I (with statins, ezetimibe, or statins plus niacin). Triglyceride levels remained relatively unchanged when colesevelam was combined with statins, fibrates, ezetimibe, or statin plus ezetimibe, and decreased with the triple combination of colesevelam, statin, and niacin. Colesevelam offset the negative glycemic effects of statins and niacin in subjects with insulin resistance or impaired glucose tolerance. Colesevelam was generally well tolerated when added to other lipid-lowering therapies in clinical trials, with gastrointestinal effects such as constipation being the predominant adverse events. Since colesevelam is not absorbed and works primarily in the intestine, it has a low potential for systemic metabolic drug–drug interactions with other drugs. Colesevelam has been shown to not interact with the lipid-lowering drugs lovastatin and fenofibrate; where interaction may be anticipated, separating dosing times by 4 h reduces the impact of any interaction. Available data confirms that colesevelam has additive cholesterol-lowering effects when used in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies. Furthermore, in some patient populations, the additional glucose-lowering effect of colesevelam may be beneficial in offsetting hyperglycemic effects of other lipid-lowering drugs.     

Statin-induced vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis: a possible role in the prevention of restenosis?

Growing evidence suggests that statins are more than simple lipid-lowering drugs. The so called pleiotropic effects of statins include multiple actions on cells of the vasculature. A large number of studies have confirmed that these compounds exert beneficial effects by mechanisms unrelated to cholesterol metabolism. For example, statins have been shown to inhibit the migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and to induce apoptosis in this cell type. It is not yet clear if the induction of apoptosis in VSMC by statins is beneficial or detrimental. In the context of post-angioplasty restenosis, recurrent plaque growth after intervention, the inhibition of neointimal proliferation as well as a reduction of neointimal cell numbers by apoptosis is appealing. Multiple animal studies and clinical trials have therefore been undertaken to investigate effects of statin treatment on the development of restenosis, with very controversial results. Conversely, in advanced atherosclerotic lesions VSMC in the intima may stabilize the plaque and prevent plaque rupture by synthesizing collagen. VSMC in media adjacent to plaque areas or restenotic lesions should not be exposed to apoptosis promoting agents. In this context, recent evidence suggests that pravastatin protects such lesions by inhibiting inflammation and macrophage activation Our recent findings together with observations from other groups suggest that neointima cells are more sensitive to the induction of apoptosis than media VSMC. Importantly, statins were found to preferentially induce apoptosis in neointimal VSMC in our study. The purpose of the present review is to summarize statin effects on proliferation and apoptosis in VSMC in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the development of drug-coated stents may help to deliver high local doses of statins to enhance their effectiveness in the treatment of post-angioplasty restenosis.     

Pharmacotherapy of hypercholesterolaemia: statins in clinical practice

The objective of this article is to evaluate the roles of the lipid-lowering class of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in reducing cardiovascular events and to review their mechanism of action based on in vitro and in vivo studies. The clinical outcome of 15 major clinical trials has been critically reviewed and summarised; all showed a high degree of efficacy and safety. Statins, either in active or prodrug forms, are potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, have good absorption rate and their bioavailability depends on their lipophobicity and concomitant use with meals. Abdominal discomfort is the most commonly reported adverse effect. Although the incidence is low, myopathy with or without rhabdomyolysis may be considered a serious adverse effect of statins. A combination of a statin with gemfibrozil seems to increase the risk of this adverse event, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Combination therapy with several other agents, frequently administered to cardiovascular patients, has also been reviewed. Statin therapy is considered highly cost effective in secondary prevention, but it is less cost effective in primary prevention. This factor may underline the rationale for developing other safe and effective agents with an improved cost effectiveness profile. The pleiotropic non-lipid lowering effects of statins may include their anti-oxidant and antithrombotic potential as well as restoration of endothelial function. Statins may also be beneficial in the treatment of osteoporosis. Fewer studies have investigated statins’ effects on the quality of lipoprotein particles, the activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase as well as their possible synergistic effects with n-3 fatty acids, anti-oxidants and aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.     

Pharmacotherapy of hypercholesterolaemia: statins in clinical practice

The objective of this article is to evaluate the roles of the lipid-lowering class of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in reducing cardiovascular events and to review their mechanism of action based on in vitro and in vivo studies. The clinical outcome of 15 major clinical trials has been critically reviewed and summarised; all showed a high degree of efficacy and safety. Statins, either in active or prodrug forms, are potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, have good absorption rate and their bioavailability depends on their lipophobicity and concomitant use with meals. Abdominal discomfort is the most commonly reported adverse effect. Although the incidence is low, myopathy with or without rhabdomyolysis may be considered a serious adverse effect of statins. A combination of a statin with gemfibrozil seems to increase the risk of this adverse event, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Combination therapy with several other agents, frequently administered to cardiovascular patients, has also been reviewed. Statin therapy is considered highly cost effective in secondary prevention, but it is less cost effective in primary prevention. This factor may underline the rationale for developing other safe and effective agents with an improved cost effectiveness profile. The pleiotropic non-lipid lowering effects of statins may include their anti-oxidant and antithrombotic potential as well as restoration of endothelial function. Statins may also be beneficial in the treatment of osteoporosis. Fewer studies have investigated statins' effects on the quality of lipoprotein particles, the activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase as well as their possible synergistic effects with n-3 fatty acids, anti-oxidants and aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.     

Beneficial effects of statins on endothelial dysfunction and vascular stiffness

Endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness are considered independent predictors of cardiovascular risk. Endothelial dysfunction primarily reflects decreased availability of nitric oxide, a critical endothelium-derived vasoactive factor with vasodilatory and anti-atherosclerotic properties. Techniques for assessing endothelial dysfunction include ultrasonographic measurement of flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery and plethysmographic measurement of forearm blood flow responses to vasoactive agents. Arterial stiffness can be assessed using pulse wave analysis to generate measures of pulse wave velocity, arterial compliance and wave reflection. It has been demonstrated that the preventive effect of statins on coronary events is not only attributed to cholesterol-lowering, but also to various effects on the vascular wall, which include improved endothelial function as well as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Previous studies have reported improvement of arterial stiffness by the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of statin therapy in patients with or without hypercholesterolemia. The present review considers the pathophysiology underlying endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness associated with atherosclerotic disease and the beneficial effects of statins on these markers of atherosclerosis.     

Statins in acute coronary syndromes

The development of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) has been a very significant development in the management of coronary artery disease. Large prospective clinical trials have provided unequivocal evidence that cholesterol lowering therapy with statins reduces all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. There is now accumulating data indicating that statin treatment should be initiated early after an acute coronary syndrome. This body of evidence is based on large databases in which investigators compared outcomes among patients taking statins with those patients who were not prescribed cholesterol lowering therapy. Prospective, randomized, clinical trials also indicate that early statin therapy reduces recurrent ischemia. Finally, studies examining long-term compliance with statin therapy suggest increased adherence to therapy when statins are prescribed during the initial hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome. In tandem with these clinical observations, there is a large body of scientific data that highlights many important cellular and molecular mechanisms through which statins may confer early benefit. These effects involve relatively rapid improvement in endothelial function, antiischemic, antithrombotic and antiinflammatory actions of statins.     

Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome characterized by the inability of the heart to maintain a normal cardiac output without elevated intracardiac filling pressures, resulting in signs of pulmonary and peripheral edema and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue. Central to the management of HF is a multifaceted pharmacological intervention to abate the harmful counter-regulatory effects of neurohormonal activation and avid salt and water retention. Whereas up to 40 years ago HF was managed with diuretics and leaf of digitalis, the cornerstones of therapy for HF patients with systolic dysfunction now include ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers), β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers), and aldosterone antagonists, which have significantly improved survival. However, with the increasing number of beneficial therapies, there are challenges to implementing all of them. Specific cardiomyopathies also merit specific considerations with respect to treatment, and — unfortunately — there is no therapy for HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction that has been shown to improve survival. Although mortality has improved in HF, the biggest challenge to treatment lies in addressing the morbidity of this disease, which is now the most common reason for hospital admission in our aged population. As such, there are many therapies that may serve to improve the quality of life of HF patients. Future HF treatment regimens may include direct cellular therapy via hormone and cytokine signaling or cardiac regeneration through growth factors or cell therapy.     

Mechanisms for antiplatelet action of statins

Hydroxymethyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) offer important benefits for the large populations of individuals at high risk for coronary heart and cerebrovascular disease. the overall clinical benefits observed with statin therapy appear to be greater than what might be expected from changes in lipid profile alone, suggesting that the beneficial effects of such drugs may extend beyond their effects on serum cholesterol. Platelet hyperactivity is a key step in atherothrombosis and experimental data suggest that statins could exert an antiplatelet effect which could be involved in their protective action. In the present review we report of the major studies in humans showing the effect of statins on platelets, especially by the more sensitive methods to explore platelet function such as cytofluorymetric detection of specific proteins. Moreover we describe the putative mechanisms involved in platelet deactivation with particular regard to the effects related to cholesterol reduction or beyond lipid-lowering. Indeed, data from several studies suggest some differences among compounds in terms of timing of action by modulation of several activating pathways which could take part either in the early, cholesterol-lowering independent, effects in the acute phase of vascular disease or during chronic treatment.     

Novel mechanistic and clinical implications concerning the safety of statin discontinuation

The beneficial effects of statins have been discussed widely, and their preventative role has been confirmed in cardiovascular disorders, primary and secondary prevention settings, and in asymptomatic subjects with a high cardiovascular risk. Despite these benefits, discontinuation of statins is frequent in cardiac patients and might be associated with adverse outcomes in several conditions involving acute coronary syndromes or acute stroke. In this review, we focus on the mechanistic background of statins that might contribute to such negative changes and that extend beyond cholesterol-lowering effects, including the so-called pleiotropic statin activity. In particular, findings regarding the detrimental impact of statin withdrawal on endothelial function, inflammation, platelet activity or AT1 signaling are discussed, along with the possible clinical implications for statin safety.     

Defining the Role of High-Dose Statins in PCI

Several studies have reported a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or in patients with stable ischemic heart disease with the use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins). Based on these findings, current guidelines recommend the use of statin therapy before hospital discharge for all patients with ACS regardless of the baseline low-density lipoprotein level. Statins are also recommended to patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Statins have been introduced in the clinical arena to reduce the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level that is associated with coronary atherosclerosis; however, a growing body of evidence suggests that other mechanisms of action beyond the modification of the lipid profile may come into action. In particular, statins exert antiinflammatory effects, modulate endothelial function, and inhibit the thrombotic signaling cascade. All together the non-LDL cholesterol-lowering effects of statins are called pleiotropic effects. In this article we will review the evidence supporting the use of high-dose statins in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and we will also attempt to highlight the possible mechanisms of action.