Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for Hepatitis C virus among all inmates in an Irish prison

BackgroundIn Irish prisons, there is a high proportion of people who inject drugs (PWID; 26%) and a high prevalence of HCV (16%), making prison a high priority setting for HCV testing and treatment. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a mass HCV screening intervention in Mountjoy Prison, Dublin, compared to the standard-of-care of intermittent screening on committal.MethodsPrimary cost data was collected from the intervention using an overall provider perspective. Standard-of-care (SOC) costs were estimated through interview. All costs were inflated to 2020 Euros. An HCV transmission and disease progression model among incarcerated and community PWID and ex-injectors was calibrated to the Dublin HCV epidemic, allowing inclusion of population-level health benefits. The model used intervention data, suggesting 419 individuals were screened, 50 HCV infections diagnosed and 32 individuals initiated treatment, to project the resulting costs and health benefits (quality adjusted life years or QALYs) over 50 years with 5% discounting. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), cost per QALY gained, was estimated for the screening intervention compared to the standard-of-care. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) determined the probability that the intervention was cost-effective compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY as used in Ireland. The ICER for 1- or 3-yearly mass screening in all Dublin prisons was also calculated.ResultsThe total direct costs of the intervention (not including treatment drug costs) was €82,392, with most costs being due to staff (43%) and overhead or management costs (38%). Despite having little epidemiological impact due to the small numbers treated, over 50 years the incremental cost of the intervention was €36,592 and 3.8 QALYs were gained, giving a mean ICER of €9,552/QALY. The majority (84%) of PSA runs were below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Yearly mass screening had an ICER of €2,729/QALY compared to SOC and gave a higher net monetary benefit (€7,393,382) than screening every 3 years (€6,252,816).ConclusionPrison mass screening could be a cost-effective initiative for increasing testing and treatment of HCV in Ireland.     

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of nationwide campaigns for awareness and case finding of hepatitis C targeted at people who inject drugs and the general population in the Netherlands

BackgroundHepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is a serious, but underdiagnosed disease that can generally be treated successfully. Therefore, a nationwide HCV awareness campaign was implemented in the Netherlands targeting people who inject drugs (PWID) in addiction care (‘PWID intervention’) and high-risk groups in the general population (‘public intervention’). The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the interventions used in this campaign.MethodsFor the ‘PWID’ intervention, all addiction care centres in the Netherlands provided proactive individual HCV consultation and testing. The ‘public intervention’ consisted of health education through mass media and instruction of health care professionals. A Markov chain model was used to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER, cost per QALY gained). We included a ‘DAA treatment’ scenario to estimate the effect of these treatment strategies on cost-effectiveness.ResultsThe ‘PWID intervention’ identified 257 additional HCV-carriers. The ICER was €9056 (95% CI: €6043–€13,523) when compared to ‘no intervention’. The ‘public intervention’ identified 38 additional HCV-carriers. The ICER was €18,421 (95% CI: €7376–€25,490,119) when compared to ‘no intervention’. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability that the ‘PWID intervention’ was cost-effective was 100%. It also showed a probability of 34% that the ‘public intervention’ did not exceed the Dutch threshold for cost-effectiveness (€20,000). New treatment regimens are likely to improve cost-effectiveness of this strategy.ConclusionIn a nationwide HCV awareness and case finding campaign, the intervention targeting PWID was effective and cost-effective. An intervention targeting risk groups in the general population showed only a modest effect and is therefore less likely to be cost-effective.     

Cost-effectiveness in Italy of preventive treatment with ramipril in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events

ABSTRACT

Objectives: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in Italy of preventive treatment with ramipril (an angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) compared to no treatment in patients at high risk of cardiovascular death. The analysis was based on data extracted from the HOPE trial.

Methods: The current life table method was used in order to model a lifetime time horizon for outcomes and costs. The cohorts used were 1000 subjects on ramipril, and 1000 subjects on placebo enrolled in the HOPE trial. Kaplan–Meier curves at 5 years of the clinical study were fitted using an exponential model over a lifetime horizon, the outcome variables being myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization and death. Total direct medical costs have been considered from a third-party payer's perspective – the Italian National Health Service. Resources involved in each event/activity were estimated using the modified Delphi technique with a panel of six clinicians. Types of resources reported included drug therapies, laboratory and imaging tests, physician visits, outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation, as well as medical and surgical hospital admissions. The incremental cost per life year gained was the main measure of the analysis.

Results: ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) decreases with the length of the treatment period. After the first year the ICER is €55?062 and subsequently decreases to about €12?770 at 5 years, €5945 at 10 years and €3726 at 20 years. The two ways sensitivity analysis showed that at 5 years ICERs range from a saving of €4059 to a cost of €22?929 (at 20 years they are €1814 and €4434), mainly depending on the cost of drug and cost of events. Previous analyses in other countries based on the HOPE study obtained ICER values which are comparable with our results, when taking into account the different cost structure of the health care systems.

Conclusions: On the basis of these results, the use of ramipril is likely to represent an efficient use of public health expenditure in the Italian healthcare system.     

UK cost-utility analysis of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that failed to respond adequately to a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the incremental cost effectiveness of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that failed to respond adequately to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; bDMARDs). A cost-utility model has been developed to simulate the long-term incremental cost and benefits of rituximab using data from clinical trials and registries.

Methods: The model estimates the lifetime disease progression of up to 10 000 hypothetical rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients that failed one bDMARD. It compares cost and outcomes of two treatment sequences, representing the current UK standard both with and without rituximab. The population characteristics match those of the Randomised Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of rituximab in RA (REFLEX) phase III randomised control trial. Clinical outcomes were based on an indirect comparison of published American College of Rheumatology response rates, adjusted for differences in placebo. To estimate medical resource use, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) scores were grouped into five categories with UK registry data informing the average cost for each category. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were mapped from disease severity (HAQ scores).

Results: Compared to a standard UK treatment sequence (assuming the sequential use of bDMARDs) the introduction of rituximab led to a QALY gain of 0.526 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) based on total direct medical cost were £11 601. Adding rituximab to a treatment sequence with no sequential use of biologic generates an ICER of £14 690.

Conclusion: Rituximab has lower average annual treatment costs compared to other bDMARDs and is a highly cost-effective treatment option for patients who have failed to respond adequately to one bDMARD. The cost per QALY gained of rituximab falls well below commonly accepted thresholds within the UK. Potential weaknesses of the model include the paucity of data on the efficacy of bDMARDs or non-biologic DMARDs when used as second-line options; the lack of consensus about the most appropriate therapy in patients who fail all available bDMARDs; probable underestimation of the non-drug related medical costs; indirect measurement of QALY gains with rituximab therapy; and the necessity of synthesising data from a number of clinical trials with different populations and study drugs.     

Cost-effectiveness of insulin aspart versus human soluble insulin in type 2 diabetes in four European countries: subgroup analyses from the PREDICTIVE study

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term health economic outcomes associated with insulin aspart (IAsp) compared to human soluble insulin (HI) in type 2 diabetes patients on basal-bolus therapy in Sweden, Spain, Italy and Poland.

Methods: A published computer simulation model of diabetes was used to predict life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and incidence of diabetes-related complications. Baseline cohort characteristics (age 61.6 years, duration of diabetes 13.2 years, 45.1% male, HbA_1c 8.2%, BMI 29.8?kg/m²) and treatment effects were derived from the PREDICTIVE observational study. Country-specific complication costs were derived from published sources. The analyses were run over 35-year time horizons from third-party payer perspectives in Spain, Italy and Poland and from a societal perspective in Sweden. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at country-specific discount rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: IAsp was associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, and a reduced incidence of most diabetes-related complications versus HI in all four settings. IAsp was associated with societal cost-savings in Sweden (SEK 2470), direct medical cost-savings in Sweden and Spain (SEK 8248 and €1382, respectively), but increased direct costs in Italy (€2235) and Poland (€743). IAsp was associated with improved quality-adjusted life expectancy in Sweden (0.077 QALYs), Spain (0.080 QALYs), Italy (0.120 QALYs) and Poland (0.003 QALYs).

Conclusions: IAsp was dominant versus HI in both Sweden and Spain, would be considered cost-effective in Italy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €18?597 per QALY gained, but would not be considered cost-effective in Poland.     

Varenicline for smoking cessation intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Introduction: In smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), smoking cessation was previously demonstrated to reduce lung function decline and disease morbidity if it resulted in a sustained tobacco abstinence. Varenicline is a newer pharmacologic therapeutic agent able to reduce withdrawal symptoms in smokers, and this makes it particularly valuable in inducing abstinence in patients with significant addiction.

Areas covered: This paper discusses the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of a smoking cessation intervention including varenicline in patients with COPD.

Expert opinion: Varenicline can be an appropriate aid to maintaining smoking abstinence in patients with COPD and heavier nicotine addiction, and the documentation of the long-term effects of a smoking cessation intervention that includes this pharmacologic therapeutic agent is necessary.     

The cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treating patients with gastric antral vascular ectasia refractory to first line endoscopic therapy

Abstract

Objective: This economic evaluation aims to provide a preliminary assessment of the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared with argon plasma coagulation (APC) when used to treat APC-refractory gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in symptomatic patients.

Methods: A Markov model was constructed to undertake a cost-utility analysis for adults with persistent symptoms secondary to GAVE refractory to first line endoscopic therapy. The economic evaluation was conducted from a UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective, with a 20-year time horizon, comparing RFA with APC. Patients transfer between health states defined by haemoglobin level. The clinical effectiveness data were sourced from expert opinion, resource use and costs were reflective of the UK NHS and benefits were quantified using Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) with utility weights taken from the literature. The primary output was the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per QALY gained.

Results: Over a lifetime time horizon, the base case ICER was £4840 per QALY gained with an 82.2% chance that RFA was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. The model estimated that implementing RFA would result in reductions in the need for intravenous iron, endoscopic intervention and requirement for blood transfusions by 27.1%, 32.3% and 36.5% respectively. Compared to APC, RFA was associated with an estimated 36.7% fewer procedures.

Conclusions: RFA treatment is likely to be cost-effective for patients with ongoing symptoms following failure of first line therapy with APC and could lead to substantive reductions in health care resource.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multivariate index assay compared to modified American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria and CA-125 in the triage of women with adnexal masses

Objective:

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the multivariate index assay (MIA) for use in triaging women with an adnexal mass relative to modified American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (mACOG) referral guidelines and CA-125 testing alone.

Methods:

The MIA triage algorithm was based on qualitative serum testing of five biomarkers: transthyretin, apolipoprotein, A-1, 2-microglobulin, transferrin, and CA-125. An economic analysis was developed to evaluate the clinical and cost implications of adopting MIA in clinical practice versus the mACOG referral guidelines and CA-125 alone, over a lifetime horizon, from the perspective of the public payer. Clinical parameters used to characterize patients’ disease status, quality of life, and treatment decisions were estimated using the results of published studies; costs were approximated using reimbursement rates from CMS fee schedules. Model endpoints included overall survival (OS), costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The cost-effectiveness threshold was set to $50,000 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess uncertainty of individual parameters included in the analysis. All costs were reported in 2014 US dollars.

Results:

Use of MIA was cost-effective, resulting in fewer re-operations and pre-treatment CT scans. Overall MIA resulted in an ICER of $35,094/QALY gained. MIA was also cost-saving and QALY-increasing compared to use of CA-125 alone with an ICER of $12,189/QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the ICER was most affected by the following parameters: (1) sensitivity of MIA; (2) sensitivity of mACOG; and (3) percentage of patients, not referred to a gynecologic oncologist, who were correctly diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Conclusion:

Use of MIA is a more cost-effective triage strategy than mACOG or CA-125. It is expected to increase the percentage of women with ovarian cancer that are referred to gynecologic oncologists, which is shown to improve clinical outcomes. Limitations include the use of assumptions when published data was unavailable, and the use of multiple sources for survival data.     

Cost-effectiveness of statins in the prevention of coronary heart disease events in middle-aged Finnish men

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin 20?mg, rosuvastatin 10?mg and simvastatin 40?mg in primary and secondary prevention of CHD in Finland.

Research design and methods: The effect of statin therapy on the incidence of CHD and the expected total costs of the disease were described using a Markov state transition model. Due to the limited amount of evidence concerning mortality and morbidity for rosuvastatin, the model was used to transmute the efficiency data of all statins (decrease in total cholesterol) into long-term endpoints (myocardial infarction, death) using risk functions of the FINRISK and 4S studies. The study followed a characterized cohort of 55-year-old Finnish men with an average 3.3–6.6?%?baseline risk of dying from cardiovascular disease within a 10-year period.

Main outcome measures: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, compared with simvastatin, measured as cost of life years gained (€/LYG) and cost of quality adjusted life years gained (€/QALY).

Results: The use of rosuvastatin increased the life expectancy by 0.27 years on average (LYG) compared with simvastatin, producing additional 0.08 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Compared with simvastatin, the cost of one LYG with rosuvastatin was €10 834 and the cost of one QALY gained was €36 548 (discount rate 5?%?per annum). Corresponding figures for atorvastatin were €31 286/LYG and €105 599/QALY.

Conclusions: If the decision makers’ willingness to pay for a QALY gained is around €40 000 there is a high probability (?>?50?%?) that rosuvastatin represents a cost-effective form of therapy in the prevention of CHD in middle-aged men with an average 3.3–6.6?%?risk of dying within 10 years from cardiovascular disease. However, the true clinical impact of these results needs confirmation from on-going clinical trials, as the role of rosuvastatin in reducing clinical events is pending, but for simvastatin and atorvastatin established.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pregabalin versus gabapentin in the management of neuropathic pain due to diabetic polyneuropathy or post-herpetic neuralgia

ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of branded pregabalin (PGB) versus generic gabapentin (GBP) in patients with neuropathic pain (NeP) due to painful diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) or post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) in Spain.

Methods: Using stochastic simulation, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of PGB 150–600?mg/d vs. GBP 900–3600?mg/d in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients. The model used data from three randomized controlled clinical trials. Pain was evaluated using a 0–10 scale. Mean baseline pain was 6.9 in both treatment groups. The model assigned untreated pain scores over 84 days. Treated scores were calculated using weekly changes in pain scores from trials. Outcomes included the numbers of days with no or mild pain (score < 4), days with ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reductions in pain intensity, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and estimated health costs.

Results: Compared with GBP, PGB yielded an estimated mean of 8 (standard error, 0.4) additional days with no or mild pain, 6 (0.4) days with ≥ 30% reduction in pain intensity, 9 (0.5) days with ≥ 50% reduction in pain intensity, and a gain of 0.1186 (0.0002) QALYs for 12 weeks. The estimated total health costs of therapies were €1049 (€35) for PGB and €951 (€38) for GBP, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for PGB versus GBP were a mean of €12 (95% confidence interval, €1–24) per additional day with no or mild pain, €431 (dominant–€876) per additional patient with no or mild pain, and €20?535 (€1607–40?345) per QALY gained.

Conclusions: According with data used in this modeling in patients with NeP due to DPN and/or PHN, PGB was shown to be more cost-effective than generic gabapentin in Spain.     

Cost-effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the management of schizophrenia in the UK

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic treatment sequences for the management of stable schizophrenia in the UK.

Research design and methods: A Markov model was developed to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from 12 alternative treatment sequences each containing two of four atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone), followed by clozapine. The main model parameters were populated with data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study and a recent trial comparing aripiprazole with olanzapine. Patients enter the model with stable schizophrenia and may relapse, discontinue or continue and experience adverse events (AEs), or develop diabetes. Population mortality was adjusted for schizophrenia and diabetes. Utility decrements applied to stable schizophrenia, relapse, diabetes and treatment-related AEs were taken from a direct UK utility elicitation study. Resource use and unit costs were taken from published sources. A time horizon of 10 years was adopted. Results are based on 10,000 probabilistic iterations of the model.

Results: Aripiprazole followed by risperidone produced the greatest number of QALYs, an additional 0.03 compared with risperidone followed by olanzapine, at an incremental cost of £257 (incremental cost/QALY: £9,440). Aripiprazole followed by risperidone had the greatest probability among evaluated sequences of being cost-effective at a threshold of >£10,000/QALY. All other strategies were dominated by at least one of these strategies. The impact of lower pricing for risperidone (based on generic availability) did not impact results.

Conclusions: Modelling the cost-effectiveness of different treatment sequences for stable schizophrenia is appropriate given that patients rarely remain on one treatment for long periods. The treatment sequence aripiprazole followed by risperidone was the most cost-effective option for patients with stable schizophrenia in the UK.     

The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in premature infants with a gestational age of 32–35 weeks: a Canadian-based analysis

ABSTRACT

Background: Prophylactic therapy with palivizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, has been shown to reduce the number of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related hospitalizations in preterm infants, including those in the 32–35 weeks’ gestational age (GA) subgroup. The cost-effectiveness of this therapy in Canada is unknown.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of palivizumab as respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in premature infants born at 32–35 weeks’ GA.

Design: A decision analytic model was designed to compare both direct and indirect medical costs and benefits of prophylaxis in this subgroup of premature infants. Sensitivity analyses were performed to ascertain the robustness of the model for five point estimates: mortality rate, discounting rates, health-utility values, degree of vial-sharing and administration costs. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was also conducted.

Setting: Canadian publicly funded health-care system (Ministry of Health payer perspective) for base-case analysis. Societal perspective, accounting for future lost productivity, was adopted for a secondary analysis.

Participants: Canadian infants born at 32–35 weeks’ GA without chronic lung disease.

Interventions: Palivizumab prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

Main outcome measures: Expected costs and incremental cost–effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per life-year gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) using 2007 Canadian dollars.

Results: The expected costs were higher for palivizumab prophylaxis as compared with no prophylaxis. The incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the base-case scenario was $20 924 per QALY after discounting, which is considered cost-effective in Canada. When the uncertainty of the input parameter assumptions was tested through sensitivity analyses assessing several data sources for five key parameters, no substantial differences were found from the base-case results. The PSA indicated a 0.99 probability that the ICER for palivizumab was less than $50 000/QALY. Sub-analyses that varied the number of risk factors found that for infants with two or more risk factors, or at least moderate risk, palivizumab had incremental costs per QALY that indicated moderate-to-strong evidence for adoption (range: $808–81 331, per QALY).

Conclusions: Palivizumab was cost-effective and the authors’ model supports prophylaxis for infants born at 32–35 weeks’ GA, particularly those with more than two risk factors or at least a moderate level of risk according to a risk scoring tool.     

Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention: a European model based on a meta-analysis of the PCI-CURE,CREDO and PCI-CLARITY trials*

ABSTRACT

Objective: Our objective was to conduct a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis of pre-treatment and long-term treatment with clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in three European countries based on a meta-analysis of the PCI-Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE), Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) and PCI-Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Therapy (CLARITY) trials. This analysis adds to existing knowledge by providing further data on the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in PCI across a wide spectrum of patients.

Methods: A combined decision tree and Markov model was created. The relative risks of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and of major bleedings with clopidogrel were based on a fixed-effects meta-analysis. The risk of ischaemic events in untreated patients and long-term survival were taken from the Swedish hospital and death registers. A societal perspective was used in Sweden and a payer perspective in Germany and France. Costs are stated in €2006 and effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

Results: The pooled effects of clopidogrel on the combined endpoint showed a relative risk of 0.711 (p = 0.003) at 30 days and 0.745 (p = 0.002) at end of follow-up (up to 1 year). Pre-treatment with clopidogrel compared with aspirin alone is a dominant strategy. Long-term treatment with clopidogrel compared with 1-month treatment leads to approximately 0.09 QALYs at an incremental cost of €393 in Sweden, €709 in Germany and €494 in France. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios range from €4225/QALY to €7871/QALY.

Conclusion: The results of this modelling analysis suggest that pre-treatment and long-term treatment in PCI with clopidogrel for up to 1 year are cost-effective in a range of patient groups and settings given commonly accepted thresholds.     

Clinical and cost implications of amyloid beta detection with amyloid beta positron emission tomography imaging in early Alzheimer’s disease – the case of florbetapir

Objective: Amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging helps estimate Aβ neuritic plaque density in patients with cognitive impairment who are under evaluation for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Aβ-PET scan as an adjunct to standard diagnostic assessment for diagnosis of AD in France, using florbetapir as an example.

Methods: A state-transition probability analysis was developed adopting the French Health Technology Assessment (HTA) perspective per guidance. Parameters included test characteristics, rate of cognitive decline, treatment effect, costs, and quality of life. Additional scenarios assessed the validity of the analytical framework, including: (1) earlier evaluation/treatment; (2) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a comparator; and (3) use of other diagnostic procedures. Outputs included differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). All benefits and costs were discounted for time preferences. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of findings and key influencers of outcomes.

Results: Aβ-PET used as an adjunct to standard diagnostic assessment increased QALYs by 0.021 years and 10 year costs by €470 per patient. The ICER was €21,888 per QALY gained compared to standard diagnostic assessment alone. When compared with CSF, Aβ-PET costs €24,084 per QALY gained. In other scenarios, Aβ-PET was consistently cost-effective relative to the commonly used affordability threshold (€40,000 per QALY). Over 95% of simulations in the sensitivity analysis were cost-effective.

Conclusion: Aβ-PET is projected to affordably increase QALYs from the French HTA perspective per guidance over a range of clinical scenarios, comparators, and input parameters.     

Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Upper Limb Spasticity Due to Stroke with Botulinum Toxin Type A: Results from the Botulinum Toxin for the Upper Limb after Stroke (BoTULS) Trial

Stroke imposes significant burdens on health services and society, and as such there is a growing need to assess the cost-effectiveness of stroke treatment to ensure maximum benefit is derived from limited resources. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin type A plus an upper limb therapy programme against the therapy programme alone. Data on resource use and health outcomes were prospectively collected for 333 patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity taking part in a randomized trial and combined to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy relative to therapy alone. The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy was £93,500 per QALY gained. The probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the England and Wales cost-effectiveness threshold value of £20,000 per QALY was 0.36. The point estimates of the ICER remained above £20,000 per QALY for a range of sensitivity analyses, and the probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the threshold value did not exceed 0.39, regardless of the assumptions made.     

Modeling the economic and health consequences of managing chronic osteoarthritis pain with opioids in Germany: comparison of extended-release oxycodone and OROS hydromorphone

ABSTRACT

Objective: The Osmotic controlled-Release Oral delivery System (OROS) hydromorphone ensures continuous release of hydromorphone over 24 hours. It is anticipated that this will facilitate optimal pain relief, improve quality of sleep and compliance. This simulation compared managing chronic osteoarthritis pain with once-daily OROS hydromorphone with an equianalgesic dose of extended-release (ER) oxycodone administered two or three times a day.

Methods: This discrete event simulation follows patients for a year after initiating opioid treatment. Pairs of identical patients are created; one receives OROS hydromorphone the other ER oxycodone; undergo dose adjustments and after titration can be dissatisfied or satisfied, suffer adverse events, pain recurrence, or discontinue the opioid. Each is assigned an initial sleep problems score, and an improved score from a treatment dependent distribution at the end of titration; these are translated to a utility value. Utilities are assigned pre-treatment, updated until the patient reaches the optimal dose or is non-compliant or dissatisfied. The OROS hydromorphone and ER oxycodone doses are converted to equianalgesic morphine doses using the following ratios: hydromorphone to morphine ratio; 1:5, oxycodone to morphine ratio; 1:2. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty in the conversion ratios and other key parameters. Direct medical costs are in 2005 euros.

Results: Over 1 year on a mean daily morphine-equivalent dose of 90?mg, 14% were estimated to be dissatisfied with each opioid. OROS hydromorphone was predicted to yield 0.017 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)/patient for a small additional annual cost (€141/patient), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €8343/QALY gained. Changing the assumed conversion ratio for oxycodone:morphine to 1:1.5 led to lower net costs of €68 per patient, €3979/QALY, and for hydromorphone to 1:7.5 to savings.

Conclusion: Based on these analyses, OROS hydromorphone is expected to yield health benefits at reasonable cost in Germany.     

Cost-effectiveness of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in long-term use: economic evaluation based on a 9‑year study in Finland

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) (Indivina) in postmenopausal women in Finland treated for up to nine consecutive years in the course of a randomised controlled trial.

Methods: In-study event data were accrued for cardiac and vascular events, cancers and fractures. These event incidence data were applied to first-year direct medical costs for these events, derived from published sources. Reference event incidence data were derived from hospital discharge records and relevant national registries for age-matched women (aged 50–70 years) in Finland with an assumed HRT usage rate of 40%. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as additional cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for women on ccHRT compared with the general population. All input data were discounted at 3% per annum.

Results: The additional cost per QALY gained for ccHRT was less than €5000 throughout the nine calendar years examined and remained well below the threshold of acceptability of €50?000 in a range of sensitivity analyses. The lowest dose-combination of ccHRT examined improved quality of life at no greater cost than no treatment.

Conclusions: This appraisal, based on event data from a uniquely long study of ccHRT, indicates that this intervention is cost-effective for the relief of symptoms of menopause.     

Cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (Stalevo) compared to standard care in UK Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off

ABSTRACT

Background and methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE;Stalevo*), in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of-dose motor fluctuations (wearing-off). LCE, with or without other antiparkinsonian medications, was compared to UK standard care, comprising traditional levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) with other antiparkinsonian medications (e.g. selegiline or dopamine agonists) added as needed. The costs and outcomes of both treatments were projected over a period of 10 years from the perspective (a) of society as a whole and (b) of the UK National Health Service (NHS). Sensitivity analyses, including second-order Monte Carlo simulations, were performed to assess the confidence level of the primary results.

Results: Treatment with LCE produced an average gain of +1.04 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient (2.57 vs. 1.53) in the base-case analysis (discount rate 3.5%). This gain was accompanied by a reduction in the total 10-year direct cost of care to society of £10?198 per patient (~ ¤14?800). From the societal perspective, therefore, LCE was dominant, producing better clinical outcomes with lower costs. This dominance was reiterated in all sensitivity analyses of society-focused analysis, including a shortening of the time-frame to 5 years.

Although treatment with LCE resulted in an increase in direct costs per patient of £3239 (£25?756 versus £22?517) to the NHS over the 10-year period analysed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of LCE was only £3105 per QALY gained (~ ¤4500). All ICERs to the NHS remained below £3800 per QALY gained in univariate sensitivity analyses applying different discount rates. When a shorter, 5-year, time-horizon was analysed, the NHS-related ICER for LCE was £6526 per QALY gained. All these ICERs are within the range usually considered to indicate acceptable or highly acceptable cost effectiveness (defined as < £30?000 per QALY gained).

The results of the Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the likelihood of LCE being either ‘dominant’ or more effective at an ‘acceptable cost’ from either the societal or the NHS perspective was high, exceeding 96% in the base-case sensitivity analysis, and was 93% even when all the uncertainties associated with the model were taken into consideration simultaneously. In particular, compared to standard care, the probability that LCE would provide better outcomes at a lower cost to society as a whole was 77% in the base-case sensitivity analysis and 72% in the scenario involving the highest degree of uncertainty.

Conclusions: In the UK the use of LCE to treat PD patients with wearing-off is beneficial to individual patients and likely to offer money savings to society as a whole, compared with UK standard therapy. The added cost of the medication itself is exceeded by the savings made in other direct costs of PD, mainly those relating to social care or PD-related private expenditures.     

特瑞普利单抗联合化疗一线治疗晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的成本-效果分析

目的 从中国卫生体系角度评估特瑞普利单抗与安慰剂联合化疗作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的一线治疗方案的成本效果。方法 通过构建3种健康状态的分区生存模型,分析了2种方案的成本-效果。有关成本、健康效用和临床结果等参数信息来自相关网站、已发表的文献和JUPITER-06 III期随机临床试验。采用质量调整生命年(quality-adjusted life year,QALY)为产出指标衡量增量成本效果比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio,ICERs),并选择中国人均国内生产总值的3倍作为意愿支付(willingness to pay,WTP)阈值来判断是否经济。通过单因素敏感性分析、概率敏感性分析评估模型的稳健性,还进行了额外情境分析评价特瑞普利单抗联合化疗对比信迪利单抗联合化疗的经济性。结果 基础案例中,在晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者中,特瑞普利单抗联合化疗相比安慰剂联合化疗可以改善生存获益并增加成本,ICER为38 083元/QALY。单因素敏感性分析表明,每周期特瑞普利单抗成本是影响ICER的关键因素,概率敏感性分析表明,在WTP阈值为每QALY为257 094元的情况下,与安慰剂联合化疗相比,特瑞普利单抗联合化疗具有成本效果的概率为100%。情境分析结果显示特瑞普利单抗联合化疗相比信迪利单抗联合化疗为相对优势方案。结论 从中国卫生体系的角度来看,特瑞普利单抗联合化疗作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者一线治疗是一种具有成本效果的选择。     

The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost,latanoprost and timolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma in five European countries

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this cost-effectiveness analysis is to evaluate cost-effectiveness ratios of the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering agents bimatoprost, latanoprost and timolol in five major European countries: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.

Methods: The cost-effectiveness analysis is based on achievement of IOP targets between 13 and 18?mm Hg. Thus, the cost-effectiveness ratios express the costs of having one patient successfully achieving IOP target. The perspective of the analysis is that of the health care sector payer, including costs of medicine and costs of ophthalmologist visits. The time frame is first year of glaucoma treatment. Four treatment strategies are analysed: Timolol as first line with add-on latanoprost or bimatoprost if IOP targets are not met, and latanoprost and bimatoprost as first line with add-on timolol.

Results: In the UK, Spain, Italy and Germany the timolol first with add-on of bimatoprost is the least expensive treatment. This strategy dominates both strategies involving latanoprost (as add-on to timolol or as first line) in these four countries. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of bimatoprost first-line therapy versus timolol with add-on bimatoprost varies from each country and target (from £305 to €43 720 per patient). In France the timolol first line and latanoprost add-on is not dominated and is the cheapest alternative. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of timolol with add-on bimatoprost versus add-on latanoprost lies between £71 and €355 per patient depending on target (18 and 13?mm Hg, respectively).

Conclusion: First-line treatment of latanoprost is dominated in all countries. In four out of five countries the timolol first-line therapy with add-on latanoprost is also dominated. Based on this pharmacoeconomic analysis, the most costeffective strategy seems to be timolol first line with add-on bimatoprost if target is not met after 3 months.