Efficacy of VDT PACE‐like regimens in treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Experience with intensive chemotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) using VDT PACE regimen and its modifications (VDT PACE‐like regimens: VPLRs) outside TOTAL THERAPY trials is limited. We analyzed the outcomes of 141 patients with RRMM who received VPLRs at our center between 2006 and 2017 in an intent‐to‐treat analysis. Median age was 59.7 years and 66.7% of patients were male. A median of 2.2 years (range 0.02‐11.4) separated diagnosis of myeloma and inititation of VPLR. High‐risk cytogenetics were present in 52.4% patients. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1‐14) prior therapies, including stem cell transplant (SCT) in 66.7% patients. Ninety‐five (67.4%) patients received VDT PACE, 20 (14.2%) patients received VD PACE and 26 (18.4%) patients received other VPLRs. Patients received a median of 1 cycle (range 1‐9) of VPLR. We observed ≥ minimal response in 68.4%, ≥ partial response (PR) in 54.4% and ≥ very good PR in 10.3% patients. Median progression‐free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 1.9‐3.9) and median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months (CI, 6.2‐9.9). One‐hundred and sixteen (82.3%) patients received some therapy after VPLR; 71 (61.2%) received systemic chemotherapy, while 45 (38.8%) underwent SCT. Median OS for those who received SCT after VPLR was 15.1 months (CI, 10.3‐20.8). Age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.3 [CI, 1.4‐3.7]; P = 0.0008) and R‐ISS III stage (HR‐ 2.4 [CI, 1.3‐4.0]; P = 0.003) predicted shorter OS in patients receiving VPLR. VPLRs are effective in heavily pre‐treated RRMM. In fit patients, SCT can be used to consolidate the response to VPLR.     

Elotuzumab in combination with thalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone: a phase 2 single‐arm safety study in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Elotuzumab is an immunostimulatory, humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that selectively targets and kills signalling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7–expressing myeloma cells. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of elotuzumab 10 mg/kg combined with thalidomide 50–200 mg and dexamethasone 40 mg (with/without cyclophosphamide 50 mg) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The primary endpoint was the proportion of grade ≥3 non‐haematological adverse events (AEs); other endpoints included the number of dose reductions/discontinuations and efficacy. Forty patients were treated, who had a median of three previous therapies, including bortezomib (98%) and lenalidomide (73%). Grade ≥3 non‐haematological AEs were reported in 63% of patients, most commonly asthenia (35%) and peripheral oedema (25%). Six (15%) patients had an infusion reaction. Twenty‐six (65%) patients had ≥1 dose reduction/discontinuation due to an AE, none related to elotuzumab. Overall response rate was 38%; median progression‐free survival was 3·9 months. Median overall survival was 16·3 months and the 1‐year survival rate was 63%. Minimal incremental toxicity was observed with addition of elotuzumab to thalidomide/dexamethasone with or without cyclophosphamide, and efficacy data suggest clinical benefit in a highly pre‐treated population. Elotuzumab combined with thalidomide may provide an additional treatment option for patients with RRMM.     

D(T)PACE as salvage therapy for aggressive or refractory multiple myeloma

Dexamethasone ± thalidomide with infusion of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide [D(T)PACE] is generally reserved as salvage therapy for aggressive multiple myeloma (MM) or plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) resistant to conventional therapies. The efficacy and durability of this potentially toxic regimen in this setting is unclear. We identified 75 patients who received D(T)PACE for relapsed/refractory MM at two tertiary care centres: Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto and Mayo Clinic Arizona. At time of D(T)PACE, 16 patients had PCL and three patients had leptomeningeal disease. Patients were heavily pretreated (median three prior regimens, range 1–12; prior autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT] 33%). Overall response rate was 49% (very‐good partial response 16%, partial response 33%) with stable disease in an additional 36%. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5·5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:4·3–9·8); overall survival (OS) 14·0 months (95% CI:8·7–19·3). Thirty‐five patients proceeded to ASCT or clinical trial, with median PFS for this subset of 13·4 months (95% CI:7·7–20·1) and OS 20·5 months (95% CI:14·8–63·8). D(T)PACE is an effective salvage therapy for heavily pretreated MM patients. Although the overall response rate of 49% in this poor prognosis cohort is reasonable, the PFS is short, suggesting the best role for D(T)PACE is in bridging to definitive therapy, such as transplantation.     

Efficacy of daratumumab‐based therapies in patients with relapsed,refractory multiple myeloma treated outside of clinical trials

Outside of clinical trials, experience with daratumumab‐based combination therapies (DCTs) using bortezomib (V)/lenalidomide (R)/pomalidomide (P), and dexamethasone (d) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is limited. We reviewed the outcomes of 126 patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of any DCT. Median age at DCT initiation was 67 (range, 43‐93) years. High‐risk cytogenetics was present in 33% patients. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1‐14) and time to first DCT from diagnosis was 4.3 years (range, 0.4‐13.0). Seventeen (13%) patients were refractory to single agent daratumumab. Fifty‐two (41%), 34 (27%), 23 (18%), and 17 (14%) received DPd, DRd, DVd and “other” DCTs, respectively. Overall response rate was 47%. Median follow‐up was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐6.1). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐7.8). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) with any regimen. Median PFS (months) was worst for penta‐refractory MM (n = 8) vs quadruple refractory MM (n = 18) and others (n = 100) (2.2 [95% CI, 1‐2.4] vs 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1‐NR] vs 5.9 [95% CI, 5.0‐NR]; P < .001); those who were refractory to ≥1 agents used in the DCT vs others (4.9 [95% CI, 3.1‐6.0] vs 8.2 [95% CI, 4.6‐NR]; P = .02); and those who received >2 prior therapies vs others (5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7‐5.9] vs NR [95% CI, NR‐NR]; P = .002). Non‐hematologic toxicities included infections (38%), fatigue (32%), and infusion reactions (18%). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were seen in 41% of patients. DCTs are effective in RRMM. ORR and PFS in heavily pretreated patients are lower than those reported in clinical trials.     

Toxicity and outcomes after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in patients age 75 or older

Randomized trials of chemoradiation for esophageal cancer have included very few patients age ≥ 75. In this retrospective study, we describe the outcomes and toxicity of full‐dose chemoradiation in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Patients, age ≥ 75, treated with full‐dose chemoradiation for esophageal carcinoma from 2002 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty‐four patients were identified with a median age of 79.5 (range 75–89). The median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range 0–3) and the median Adult Comorbidity Evaluation‐27 score was 1 (range 0–3). Twenty‐eight patients received definitive and six received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The median radiation dose delivered was 50.4 Gray (range 3.6–68.4 Gray). Platinum‐based chemotherapy was used in 79.4% of patients. Fifty percent of the patients completed all planned radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy; 85.3% completed RT. Acute toxicity ≥ grade 4 occurred in 38.2% of patients, and 70.6% of the patients required hospitalization, emergency department visit, and/or RT break. Median follow‐up was 14.5 months among 7 survivors, and median survival was 12.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7 to 24.1 months). The actuarial overall survival at 2 years was 29.7% (95% CI: 16.6 to 52.6%). There were four treatment‐related deaths. The median time to any recurrence was 10.4 months. Nineteen patients had a local and/or distant recurrence. In conclusion, elderly patients experienced substantial morbidity from chemoradiation, and long‐term survival was low. Future efforts to improve treatment tolerability in the elderly are needed.     

Pomalidomide,cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-164 study)

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a short life expectancy, especially when they have failed both the proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator therapies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PCd) in elderly patients with RRMM. This phase 2 clinical trial recruited 55 elderly patients with RRMM. The patients underwent a 28-day treatment cycle: pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, administered orally) and cyclophosphamide (400 mg/day on days 1, 8, and 15; administered orally) plus dexamethasone. The median (range) age of the patients was 73.3 (64-86) years, and 8 (14.5%) patients who were ≥ 80 years old. Eight (14.5%) and 31 (56.4%) patients exhibited stage III (revised international staging system) and frail status (simplified frailty scale), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of PCd therapy were 58.2% and 72.7%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 6.90 months (95% CI, 4.7-9.0) and 18.48 months (95% CI, 9.4-27.6), respectively. The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicities was 70.8%. In particular, the incidence rate of primary infection was 45.4%, including 21.8% for pneumonia, 9.0% for sepsis, and 14.6% for febrile neutropenia. In conclusion, PCd is an effective regimen for elderly patients with RRMM who had failed both bortezomib and lenalidomide treatments, but in whom the treatment-associated infection is the main cause of morbidity and mortality.     

Rituximab plus cladribine with or without cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to determine the feasibility, effectiveness and toxicity of combined regimens consisting of rituximab and cladribine (2-CdA) (RC) and RC plus cyclophosphamide (RCC) in the treatment of patients with recurrent or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS: The RC regimen consisted of rituximab given on day 1 and 2-CdA (days 2-6). The RCC protocol included rituximab (day 1), 2-CdA (days 2-4) and cyclophosphamide given on days 2-4. The courses were re-administered at time intervals of 4 weeks or longer if severe myelosuppression occurred. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with CLL entered the study. Eighteen patients were treated with RC and 28 with RCC regimen. The median number of courses administered were three cycles (range 1-6). Three (6.5%) patients (95% CI: 1-14%) achieved a complete response and 31 (67%) patients (95% CI: 50-83%) a partial response. According to the particular regimen, the overall response rate was obtained in 12 (67%) patients treated with RC (95% CI: 45-89%) and in 22 patients (78%) treated with RCC (95% CI: 62-93%). The median progression free survival of responders to RC/RCC regimens was 12 months (range 4-46). Hypersensitivity to rituximab occurred in 16 (33%) patients, mostly during the first infusion of the drug. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in six (13%) patients, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in three (9%) patients and grade 3/4 infections were observed in ten (28%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that both RC and RCC regimens are feasible in heavily pretreated patients with CLL, showing also distinct therapeutic activity and relatively low toxicity, even in patients previously treated with cladribine-based protocols.     

Real‐world use of pomalidomide and dexamethasone in double refractory multiple myeloma suggests benefit in renal impairment and adverse genetics: a multi‐centre UK experience

Myeloma patients who become refractory to immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and bortezomib have poor survival, with limited therapeutic options. Pomalidomide has shown improved survival and good tolerability in this patient cohort in clinical trials, but real world data are scarce. We retrospectively analysed all patients treated with pomalidomide at five UK centres between 2013 and 2016. Of 85 patients identified, 70 had sufficient information for response assessments. Median age was 66 years [40–89], 96·5% were refractory to IMiDs, 72·9% were refractory to both an IMiD and bortezomib and 92·9% were refractory to their last treatment. Of 45 patients with fluorescence in situ hybridization results 64% had adverse risk, 19 patients (22·4%) had an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 ml/min. Grade ≥3 non‐haematological toxicities occurred in 42·4%, and grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 38% and 24% respectively, but only 18·8% had dose reductions. The overall response rate was 52·9%. At a median follow‐up of 13·2 months, median progression‐free survival was 5·2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4·150–6·238], and median overall survival was 13·7 months (95% CI 11·775–15·707). No significant difference was seen in response, survival or tolerability by renal function, age or cytogenetic risk. This real‐world data support the results seen in published clinical trials.     

Cetuximab efficacy and safety in a retrospective cohort of elderly patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Few data are available from clinical trials for elderly patients receiving cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical data of consecutive patients aged >/=70 years given cetuximab for metastatic CRC were retrospectively captured from hospital pharmacy registries in seven centers. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients received cetuximab+/-with irinotecan. Median age was 76 years (70-84), 86% of patients were pretreated with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan and oxaliplatin and 69.6% had documented resistance to irinotecan. Objective response rate was 21% (95% CI: 11-32%). The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.7 months) and the median overall survival was 16.0 months (95% CI: 13.5-18.5 months). Skin rash occurred in 75% of the patients (11% grade 3) and diarrhea in 80% (20% grades 3-4). CONCLUSION: Tolerability of cetuximab was acceptable in elderly patients with pretreated metastatic CRC. Efficacy appeared similar to that observed in younger patients.     

Retrospective Study of Carfilzomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India

Carfilzomib is a second-in class Proteosome Inhibitor and has been approved for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM). We retrospectively retrieved and analyzed data of KPd combination both biweekly and weekly regimens at our centre from 1 st August 2017 and 31 st May 2020. Sixty-nine patients were treated with KPd with median age of 58 years. Median prior lines of chemotherapy were 2(1-15). Twenty-eight (40.5%) patients underwent autoSCT. Median no. of cycles was 4(1-12) and 3(1-13) with median time to response of 4(2-12) and 2(2-6) months in biweekly and once weekly regimen cohorts respectively. At last follow-up, overall response rate (ORR) was 65.2%{CR-n = 10 (14.5%), VGPR-n = 19 (27.5%), PR-n = 16 (23.2%)} with n = 13(18.8%) patients had PD and relapse was observed in n = 24(34.8%). Thirty (43.4%) patients received maintenance therapy {n = 21(70%)} or autoSCT {n = 9(30%)}. Common toxicities were anemia {n = 11(15.9 %)}, thrombocytopenia (n = 15(21.7%) and neutropenia (n = 16 (23.2%)}, hypertension {n = 28(40.5%)}, peripheral neuropathy (grade1/2) {n = 15(21.7%)}, infections [n = 18(26%) {bacterial [n = 9(13%),viral n = 7(10.1%), fungal n = 8(11.6%)}]. At a median follow-up of 18 months, the estimated median PFS was 11.3 months (95%C.I. 8.3– 14.2) whereas the estimated median OS was 28 months (95%C.I. 20.4-35.5) for the entire cohort. Mortality rate of 2.5% and 10% in two cohorts respectively. Commonest cause of death was PD and sepsis. KPD is a well-tolerated regimen for RRMM, which can be a bridge to ASCT, however with significant side effects.     

Phase II trial of thalidomide for therapy of radioiodine-unresponsive and rapidly progressive thyroid carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: There are no known effective therapies for distantly metastatic, rapidly progressive thyroid carcinomas unresponsive to radioiodine. Objective: Since thyroid carcinomas are hypervascular and thalidomide is antiangiogenic, we assessed thalidomide's tumoristatic effects and toxicity in a phase II trial. DESIGN: Thirty-six patients with follicular, papillary, insular, or medullary thyroid carcinomas and distant, radioiodine-unresponsive metastases (volumes increasing >or= 30% per year before entry) were accrued between July 2001 and December 2002. Daily thalidomide started at 200 mg, increasing over 6 weeks to 800 mg or maximum tolerated dose. Toxicities and responses were assessed at 8-week intervals with tumor volume assessments. MAIN OUTCOMES: Twenty-eight of 36 patients were evaluable, 5 with partial responses (PR: 18%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 6-37%) and 9 patients with stable disease (SD: 32%; 95% CI: 12-42%) for overall 50% response (95% CI: 31-69%). Median PR duration was 4 months (range: 2-6 months), and SD duration was 6 months (range: 2-14 months). Median survival was 23.5 months for responders (PR + SD) and 11 months for nonresponders. Most frequent toxicity was fatigue (69% grade 1-2, 8% grade 3-4). Four patients had grade 3-4 infections (without neutropenia), one had pericardial effusion, and one had pulmonary embolus. CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide confers therapeutic benefit in subsets of thyroid cancer patients with rapidly progressive, distantly metastatic disease.     

Radiotherapy of rectal cancer in elderly patients: Real-world data assessment in a decade

Background and purposeThere is paucity of data on the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in rectal cancer (RC) elderly patients. The objective was to identify management strategies and resulting outcomes in RC patients ≥70 years undergoing radiotherapy.Material and methodsA retrospective study included consecutive RC patients ≥70 years undergoing rectal radiotherapy.ResultsFrom 2004–2015, 340 RC patients underwent pre-operative (n = 238; 70%), post-operative (n = 41, 12%), or exclusive (n = 61, 18%) radiotherapy, with a median age of 78.5 years old (range: 70–96). Radiotherapy protocols were tailored, with 54 different radiotherapy programs (alteration of the total dose, and/or fractionation, and/or volume). Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Acute and late grade 3–4 radio-induced toxicities were reported in 3.5% and 0.9% of patients. Metastatic setting (OR = 6.60, CI95% 1.47–46.03, p = 0.02), exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 5.08, CI95% 1.48–18.21, p = 0.009), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 6.42, CI95% 1.31–24.73, p = 0.01) were associated with grade ≥3 acute toxicities in univariate analysis. Exclusive radiotherapy (OR = 9.79, CI95% 2.49–43.18, p = 0.001) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR = 12.62, CI95% 2.05–71.26, p = 0.003) were independent predictive factors of grade ≥3 acute toxicities in multivariate analysis. A complete pathological response was achieved in 12 out of 221 pre-operative patients (5.4%). Age, tumor stage, and surgery were independent predictive factors of survival in multivariate analysis. At end of follow-up, 7.1% of patients experienced local relapse.ConclusionRadiotherapy for RC in elderly patients appeared safe and manageable, perhaps due to the tailoring of radiotherapy protocols. Tailored management resulted in acceptable rate of local tumor control.     

Cladribine (2-CDA) given as subcutaneous bolus injections is active in pretreated Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia

Clinical trials with intravenous cladribine infusions in pretreated patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia have shown a response rate of 40%. Our pharmacokinetic studies revealed that the bioavailability of subcutaneous cladribine is complete but that the concentration–time profile is very different from intravenous administration. We designed this phase II multi-institutional trial to study the activity and toxicity of cladribine given as s.c. bolus injections in patients with symptomatic Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia. Between May 1993 and October 1995, 25 patients were accrued: male/female 18/7, median age 65 years (range 44–85). All except one patient had been pretreated with more than one regimen (median 2, range 0–10). 18 patients had progressed under previous therapy and six were in relapse. All patients received cladribine for a total dose of 0.5 mg/kg per cycle as s.c. bolus injections divided over 5 d at 4 week intervals, for a maximum of six cycles. All 25 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A total of 67 cycles were administered (median 3 cycles, range 1–6). Overall response rate including disease stabilization which had been progressive under previous therapy was 68%. 10 patients (40%, 95% CI 21–61%) achieved a partial remission. Seven responders had been progressive under previous therapy. Maximum responses were reached no later than the third cycle. Median time to treatment failure and remission duration were 4.4 (range 0.5–33) and 8 months (5–29), respectively. Four patients (16%) suffered from infections W.H.O. grade 2 (pneumonia grade 2, Staphylococcus septicaemia grade 3, viral encephalitis and pneumonia, both grade 4 with complete resolution). No other severe adverse events were observed. Cladribine given as s.c. 5 d bolus injections was found to be active in pretreated Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia and resulted in durable remissions.     

Outcomes of young adults (aged ≤ 40 years) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after up-front autologous stem cell transplant

Multiple myeloma (MM) primarily affects older patients. There are scarce data on the outcomes of young adults undergoing autologous transplantation (auto-HCT). In this single-centre analysis, we included 117 younger patients, with a median age of 37 years (range 22–40) at transplant. Seventeen (15%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Before transplant, 10% of patients achieved ≥CR and 44% achieved ≥VGPR. At best post-transplant response, 56% and 77% of patients achieved ≥CR and ≥VGPR respectively. With a median follow-up for survivors of 72.6 months (range 0.9–238.0), median PFS and OS were 43.1 months (95% CI 31.2–65.0) and 146.6 months (95% CI 100.0–208.1) respectively. Patients who underwent auto-HCT after 2010 had better median PFS (84.9 months vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 91.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with those transplanted earlier. In multi-variate analysis, achieving ≥CR as best post-transplant response was associated with improved PFS (HR [95% CI] 0.55 [0.32–0.95], p = 0.032), while achieving ≥VGPR was predictive of superior OS (0.32 [0.16–0.62], p < 0.001). Three patients (3%) developed a second primary malignancy. Younger MM patients had durable survival after auto-HCT, which further improved after the availability of novel anti-myeloma drugs in recent years. Depth of response following transplant remains a key predictor of survival.     

Bendamustine as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma patients: a retrospective study of the Spanish experience

Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have an adverse outcome after relapse. Bendamustine has demonstrated a good efficacy and toxicity profile in previously reported trials. In this study, we present a retrospective analysis of the Spanish experience in relapsed/refractory MCL treated with bendamustine in combination or alone with the objective of knowing the efficacy and toxicity profile of this treatment in our current clinical practice. Fifty eight patients were registered: 67 % male with median age of 71 years, and 2 is the median number of previous lines. The most frequent bendamustine regimen was bendamustine plus rituximab (83 %). The median number of cycles was 5 (range 1–8). The overall response rate was 84 % with 53 % of complete response/unconfirmed complete response (CR/uCR). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months (95 % confidence interval (CI) 13.3–18.8), and for patients who achieved CR/uCR, it was 33 months (95 % CI 11.1–54.2). Median overall survival (OS) was 30 months (95 % CI 25.6–34.9). For PFS, only blastoid histology and not achieving CR after bendamustine had a significant negative impact on the univariate and multivariate analyses (p?<?0.05). Nevertheless, for OS, only an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) had negative impact on both, univariate and multivariate analyses (p?<?0.05). Only one case of treatment-related mortality in a 79-year-old patient with very bad performance status was reported. In 280 cycles, 12 (4 %) hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia were reported. In our population, bendamustine has been a good salvage treatment with a favorable toxicity profile in a non selected and heavily pretreated population of patients with MCL.     

Bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone combination therapy followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone consolidation as a salvage treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of efficacy and safety

We conducted a phase 2 study with bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Forty patients were enrolled between November 2005 and October 2007, with follow-up continuing until January 2009. Efficacy could be assessed in 37 patients. The overall response rate to PAD followed by TD was 83.6%: complete response 51.4%, near-complete response 13.4%, very good partial remission 5.4%, and partial response 13.4%. The median follow-up was 27 months (range 13–39). The median progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of treatment was 18 months (95% CI, 9.7–26.2 months), with a 1-year PFS rate of 56.9% and 3-year PFS rate of 25.7%. Median overall survival was 35.1 months (95% CI, 18.5–51.7), with a 1-year survival rate of 75% and 3-year survival rate of 27.3%. One hundred seventy-eight PAD cycles (median 6, range 1–6) in 38 patients were assessable for safety. The most common hematologic toxicity was thrombocytopenia, with grade 3–4 in 35.8%. Sensory neuropathy occurred at grade 2 in 26.3% and grade 3 in 10.3%. Two hundred TD treatment cycles (median 4, range 0–12 cycles) were administered. Most adverse events were of mild degree and manageable. PAD followed by TD in patients with relapsed MM is very effective and tolerable.     

Phase 1 study of selinexor plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Selinexor, an oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, targets Exportin 1 (XPO1, also termed CRM1). Non-clinical studies support combining selinexor with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and corticosteroids to overcome resistance in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of twice-weekly selinexor in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (SKd) to determine maximum tolerated dose in patients with RRMM (N = 21), with an expansion cohort to assess activity in carfilzomib-refractory disease and identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). During dose escalation, there was one dose-limiting toxicity (cardiac failure). The RP2D of twice-weekly SKd was selinexor 60 mg, carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m² and dexamethasone 20 mg. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events included thrombocytopenia (71%), anaemia (33%), lymphopenia (33%), neutropenia (33%) and infections (24%). Rates of ≥minimal response, ≥partial response and very good partial response were 71%, 48% and 14%, respectively; similar response outcomes were observed for dual-class refractory (PI and immunomodulatory drug)/quad-exposed (carfilzomib, bortezomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide) patients (n = 17), and patients refractory to carfilzomib in last line of therapy (n = 13). Median progression-free survival was 3·7 months, and overall survival was 22·4 months in the overall population. SKd was tolerable and re-established disease control in RRMM patients, including carfilzomib-refractory patients. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02199665)     

Clofarabine-based chemotherapy for relapsed/refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma. The Spanish experience

The present study reports the Spanish PETHEMA group experience in 31 heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma (LL) patients treated with clofarabine-based regimens. The complete remission (CR) rate was 31% (median CR duration of 3 months [range 2–28]) and the overall survival probability at 1 year was 10% (95%CI 4–16%). Responses were seen in B and T lineage diseases and in patients with adverse cytogenetics. Hematological and infectious grade >3 toxicities were found in 100 and 67% of the patients, respectively, with 7 (23%) treatment-related deaths. Other organ toxicities were infrequent. Clofarabine-based chemotherapy regimens might induce CRs in ALL and LL patients, but hematological toxicity and infections may limit their use in heavily pretreated patients.     

Therapeutic role of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in patients who have failed fludarabine: results of a large international study

This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and clinical benefit of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia exposed to alkylating agents and having failed fludarabine therapy. Ninety-three patients received alemtuzumab in 21 centers worldwide, with the aim to obtain an overall response rate of at least 20%. Dosage was increased gradually (target 30 mg, 3 times weekly, for a maximum of 12 weeks). Infection prophylaxis was mandatory, beginning on day 8, and continuing for a minimum of 2 months after treatment. Responses were assessed at weeks 4, 8, and 12, and patients were followed for 34 months. Overall objective response in the intent-to-treat population (n = 93) was 33% (CR 2%, PR 31%). Median time to response was 1.5 months (range, 0.4-3.7 months). Median time to progression was 4.7 months overall, 9.5 months for responders. At data cut-off, 27 patients (29%) were alive; overall median survival was 16 months (95% CI: 11.8-21.9) and 32 months for responders. Nineteen responders survived more than 21 months. Clinical benefit was observed both in responders and in patients with stable disease. The most common adverse events were related to infusion, generally grade 1 or 2 in severity, occurring mainly in the first week. Grade 3 or 4 infections were reported in 25 patients (26.9%). However, only 3 (9.7%) of 31 patients who responded to alemtuzumab treatment developed grade 3 or 4 infections on the study. Alemtuzumab induced significant responses in these patients with clinical benefit in the majority and with acceptable toxicity in a high-risk group.     

Daratumumab and dexamethasone is safe and effective for triple refractory myeloma patients: final results of the IFM 2014-04 (Etoile du Nord) trial

Single agent daratumumab has shown clinical activity in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome 2014-04 trial was designed to further investigate daratumumab in combination with dexamethasone in triple RRMM patients. Patients received daratumumab infusions in combination with weekly dexamethasone until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Fifty-seven patients were included in the trial and evaluable for response. The overall response rate and the clinical benefit rate were 33% (n = 19) and 48% (n = 27), respectively. Five (8·8%) patients achieved a very good partial response or better. The median time to response was 4 weeks. For responding patients, the median progression-free survival was 6·6 months, compared to 3·7 months (3·0–5·5) for those with a minimal or stable disease. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 16·7 months (11·2–24·0). For responding patients, the median OS was 23·23 months, whereas that of patients with progressive disease was 2·97 months. The incidence of infusion-related reactions was 37%; all cases were manageable and did not lead to dose reduction or permanent treatment discontinuation. These data demonstrate that treatment with daratumumab and dexamethasone results in a meaningful long-term benefit with an acceptable safety profile for patients with triple RRMM.