The Italian version of the Family Assessment Device

The aim of the study was to evaluate in a heterogeneous Italian sample (n= 340) the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Family Assessment Device (FAD), a 60-item questionnaire assessing family functioning. The questionnaire was administered to psychiatric (n= 116), medical (n= 114) and non-clinical samples (n = 110). In a sample of 30 non-clinical subjects the temporal stability of the FAD was investigated. The results showed a good temporal stability for Problem Solving, General Functioning, Communication, and Affective Responsiveness scales, and a good internal reliability of the scale. Factor analysis of the Italian version provided discrepancies with the hypothesized structure of the instrument, leading to the identification of seven slightly different dimensions. The proposed seven-factor model of the instrument did not provide a good fit to our data. The results of our study suggest the need for a major improvement in the adaptation of the FAD in the Italian setting. Accepted: 10 February 1998     

The Brief Assessment of Family Functioning Scale (BAFFS): a three-item version of the General Functioning Scale of the Family Assessment Device

The purpose of the present study is to compare results from the 12-item General Functioning Scale (GF-FAD) of the Family Assessment Device (FAD) to a three-item version, the Brief Assessment of Family Functioning Scale (BAFFS), designed to be used when brevity is especially important. We used principal components analysis of the GF-FAD, followed by multiple sample confirmatory factor analyses to test the robustness of the BAFFS in different samples. The BAFFS correlated highly with the GF-FAD, and demonstrated good concurrent validity with another measure of global marital functioning, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale-4 in a help-seeking sample. Like the 12-item version, the BAFFS moderately correlated with an objective, interview-based rating of family functioning, the McMaster Clinical Rating Scale. The BAFFS appears to serve as a good proxy for the GF-FAD when an ultra-brief family assessment measure is needed.     

A confirmative clinimetric analysis of the 36-item Family Assessment Device

Background: The Family Assessment Device (FAD) is a 60-item questionnaire widely used to evaluate self-reported family functioning. However, the factor structure as well as the number of items has been questioned. A shorter and more user-friendly version of the original FAD-scale, the 36-item FAD, has therefore previously been proposed, based on findings in a nonclinical population of adults.

Aims: We aimed in this study to evaluate the brief 36-item version of the FAD in a clinical population.

Methods: Data from a European multinational study, examining factors associated with levels of family functioning in adult cancer patients’ families, were used. Both healthy and ill parents completed the 60-item version FAD. The psychometric analyses conducted were Principal Component Analysis and Mokken-analysis.

Results: A total of 564 participants were included. Based on the psychometric analysis we confirmed that the 36-item version of the FAD has robust psychometric properties and can be used in clinical populations.

Conclusions: The present analysis confirmed that the 36-item version of the FAD (18 items assessing ‘well-being’ and 18 items assessing ‘dysfunctional’ family function) is a brief scale where the summed total score is a valid measure of the dimensions of family functioning. This shorter version of the FAD is, in accordance with the concept of ‘measurement-based care’, an easy to use scale that could be considered when the aim is to evaluate self-reported family functioning.     

Validation of the Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To validate in Spanish the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), a questionnaire to assess stress for research purposes in psychosomatic patients. METHOD: The test was administered to a healthy population (N=174) of nursing students and health workers and to a clinical sample (N=80) of patients attending a psychiatric outpatient consultation. RESULTS: Concurrent validity: General and Recent PSQ scores correlated high with trait anxiety (r=.65), moderate with depression (r=.46) and psychological disturbance (r=.51) and poor with state anxiety (r=.22). Predictive validity: PSQ scores were higher in "psychiatric cases" than in "psychiatric noncases" (P<.01), and correlated highly with somatic symptoms of psychological origin (r=.62) in the clinical subsample. Internal consistency was 0.9 for the General and 0.87 for the Recent PSQ. Test-retest reliability of the General PSQ was 0.80. DISCUSSION: The Spanish version of PSQ presents good psychometric properties and it seems to be a valuable instrument for psychosomatic researchers.     

The Spanish version of the WAIS: Some ethical considerations

Abstract

This commentary looks at the changes imposed upon the official (and only) Spanish translation of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale available in the United States, and finds major discrepancies that are likely to distort the final IQ measures by an average increment of 20 points. The issue of professional ethics in the use of this instrument is raised and, because of these concerns, the author recommends that the Spanish translation of the WAIS be avoided in clinical assessments in the mainland United States, and that, if this test is used at all, it be done with extreme caution.     

Reliability of the Spanish version of the Composite Scale of Morningness.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the Spanish version of Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM) and its ability to measure the circadian typology. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Voluntary and unpaid psychology students (N= 391; 132 men and 259 women), aged between 17 and 33, completed the questionnaire between the months of September and December. RESULTS: The total score was independent of age and gender, with a close to normal distribution and a non-significant negative skewness. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha= 0.87) and factor analysis extracted three factors labeled Time of Retiring (items 2 and 7), Activity Planning (items 8, 9, and 13) and Morning Affect (items 3-6, and 10-12). With the 10th and 90th percentiles as cut-off scores, scorers below 22 (N= 40; 10.2%) are classified as evening-types and scorers above 39 as morning-types (N= 28; 7.2%). CONCLUSION: The Spanish questionnaire shares most of the good psychometric properties of other versions of the CSM, and thus can be used for Spanish-speaking student samples. Nevertheless, further studies of normative data in workers and aged subjects are needed in order to validate CSM.     

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Diagnostic Interview for Depressive Personality

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Spanish-language version of the Diagnostic Interview for Depressive Personality (DIDP). The DIDP was administered to 328 consecutive outpatients and the test–retest and inter-rater reliability were assessed. Factor analysis was used in search of factors capable of explaining the scale and a cutoff point was established. The DIDP scales showed adequate Cronbach's α values and acceptable test–retest and inter-rater reliability coefficients. Convergent and discriminant validity were explored, the latter with respect to avoidant and borderline personality disorders. The results of the factor analysis were consistent with the four-factor structure of the DIDP scales. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed the area under the curve to be 0.848. We found 30 to be a good cutoff point, with a sensitivity of 74.5% and a specificity of 78.5%. The DIDP proved to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing depressive personality disorder, at least among our outpatients. The psychometric properties of the DIDP support its clinical usefulness in assessing depressive personality.     

Psychometric properties of the Spanish self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale

Objective

The goal of the study was to assess the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the Spanish self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS-SR).

Method

One hundred and twenty four patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder were assessed with the Spanish PDSS-SR, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3), the Sheehan Disability Inventory (SDI) and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency. Pearson correlations were used to evaluate test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity. Sensitivity to change data was obtained for 91 patients that had completed a cognitive behavioural therapy. The factor structure was analysed using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results

The Spanish PDSS-SR showed excellent internal consistency, good test-retest reliability and adequate convergent validity. Regarding divergent validity, the correlation with the BDI-II was larger than expected. The Spanish PDSS-SR was sensitive to change. Our CFA suggested a two-factor model for the scale.

Conclusions

The Spanish PDSS-SR has similar psychometric properties as the previous versions of the PDSS-SR and it can become a useful instrument to assess panic symptoms in clinical and research settings in Spanish-speaking countries.     

Spanish version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Spanish translation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed of delirium (DSM-IV) by a variety of general hospital medical wards criteria were assessed using the DRS-R-98, MiniMental State Examination (MMSE), Mini Examen Cognoscitivo (MEC; Spanish version of the MMSE) and the Orientation Scale (OS). Independent ratings between two psychiatrists were used to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interrater reliability. RESULTS: The DRS-R-98 had high interrater reliability for both total and severity scale scores (ICC=.96 for each). The DRS-R-98 severity score significantly correlated (P<.001) with MMSE (r=-.67), MEC (r=-.62) and OS (r=.73). Cronbach's alpha (r=.78 ) indicated high internal consistency of the DRS-R-98. CONCLUSION: The Spanish translation of the DRS-R-98 has high interrater reliability for both total and severity scale scores, high internal consistency, and very good concurrent validity in relation to other cognitive measures and therefore can be administered to delirious patients.     

Spanish Validation of the Separation Anxiety Assessment Scale

The aim of this study was to investigate the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the Separation Anxiety Assessment Scale (SAAS) with Spanish schoolchildren. The participants in Study 1 were 1281 children aged 8–11. Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors: worry about calamitous events, fear of abandonment, fear of being alone, and fear of physical illness, which explained 47.77 % of the variance. The participants of Study 2 were 4628 schoolchildren aged 8–11. The four related factors model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis. The internal consistency (α = .84) and temporal stability (r = .77) were good. The convergent validity was evident from the pattern of correlations with the measures of separation anxiety, sensitivity to anxiety and school fears. The sensitivity of the scale was 83 %, and its specificity, 93 %. The complementary subscales predicted the diagnosis of separation anxiety disorder. The results support the reliability, validity and clinical utility of the SAAS.     

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory--revised in a non-clinical sample

The psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) were examined in a non-clinical student sample (n=381). A confirmatory factor analysis replicated the original six-factor structure. The total and each of the subscales of the Spanish OCI-R demonstrated moderate to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, moderate convergent validity and good divergent validity. The Spanish version of the OCI-R retains the sound psychometric properties of the original version.     

The Spanish version of the quality of life index: presentation and validation

Latino or Spanish-speaking individuals constitute a substantial and growing population in the United States, in addition to their general presence, with cultural variations, throughout Latin America and the Iberian Peninsula. To respond to the needs of this population, a Spanish version of the Quality of Life Index (QLI-Sp) was developed. The QLI, in its various language versions, is a concise instrument for comprehensive, culture-informed, and self-rated assessment of health-rated quality of life. It is composed of 10 dimensions collated from the international literature, including aspects ranging from physical well-being to spiritual fulfillment, as well as a global perception of quality of life. Each item is to be rated on a 10-point line by Latino subjects according to their culture-informed understanding of that concept. The study samples included 60 Latino psychiatric patients (20 outpatient, 20 inpatient, and 20 partial hospitalization) and 20 Latino actively working hospital professionals. Mean time of completion was 2.4 minutes among health professionals and 3.6 minutes among patients. The vast majority of respondents (72% of patients and 1000% of professionals) judged the instrument as easy to use. The test-retest reliability correlation coefficient of the QLI-Sp mean score was .89. The discriminant validity of the QLI-Sp was documented by the highly significant difference obtained between the mean scores of the two samples selected to represent quite different levels of quality of life.     

Generalizability studies of the Global Assessment of Functioning-Split version

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to use the Generalizability Theory to investigate the reliability and precision of the split version of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). MATERIALS: Six case vignettes were assessed by 2 samples; one by 19 experienced and independent raters and another by 58 experienced raters from 8 different day-treatment units, evaluating both symptom and function scores of GAF. METHODS: Generalizability studies were conducted to disentangle relevant variance components accounting for error variance in GAF scores. Furthermore, decision studies were conducted to estimate the reliability of different measurement designs, as well as precision in terms of error tolerance ratio. RESULTS: Both symptom and function scores of GAF were found to be highly generalizable, and a measurement design of 2 raters per subject was found to be most efficient with respect to reliability, precision, and use of resources. CONCLUSION: Both symptom and function scores of GAF seem highly consistent across experienced raters.