Allergens from birch pollen and pollen of the European chestnut share common epitopes

Type I allergy to pollen of the European chestnut (Castanea sativa) represents a major cause of pollinosis in (sub) Mediterranean areas. Using sera from 14 patients with established allergy to pollen of the European chestnut, 13/14 sera (92%) showed IgE-binding to a 22 kD protein, 2/14 (14%) displayed additional binding to a 14 kD protein and 1/14 (7%) bound only to the 14 kD protein of European chestnut pollen extract. Two monoclonal mouse antibodies, BIP 1 and BIP 4, directed against different epitopes of Bet v I (the major birch pollen allergen), and a rabbit antibody to recombinant birch profilin (rBet v II) were used to characterize the proteins of the European chestnut pollen. The recombinant birch pollen allergens, rBet v I and rBet v II (profilin) were employed to show common allergenic structures on proteins from both birch and European chestnut pollen by IgE-inhibition experiments. Despite the fact that the 22 kD protein displayed a higher molecular weight in comparison to the 17 kD major birch pollen allergen, Bet v I, we could demonstrate reactivity of both monoclonal antibodies, BIP 1 and BIP 4, with this protein. A complete inhibiton of IgE-binding to this 22 kD protein was shown by pre-incubating sera with purified recombinant Bet v I. In addition, the 14 kD protein could be identified by IgE-inhibition studies with recombinant Bet v II and by using a rabbit anti-profilin antibody as the profilin from pollen of the European chestnut.     

Characterization of cross-reacting allergens in mango fruit

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to mango fruit have become increasingly important. A cross-reaction between mango fruit, various other foods, and respiratory allergens has been assumed but not investigated until now. METHODS: The sera of nine patients were used to characterize cross-reacting allergens in mango fruits by EAST inhibition and immunoblot inhibition. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: EAST inhibition and immunoblot inhibition demonstrated that cross-reactions between mango fruits, mugwort pollen, birch pollen, celery, and carrot are based on allergens related to Bet v 1 and Art v 1, the major allergens of birch and mugwort pollen, respectively.     

Allergens in pepper and paprika

Mugwort and birch pollen allergy are frequently associated with IgEmediated hypersensitivity to celery and spices. We analyzed 22 sera from patients with the mugwort-birch-celery-spice syndrome for IgE binding to the spices pepper and paprika by immunoblotting. Immunoblot results revealed two major allergens of 28 and 60 kDa in pepper and a 23-kDa allergen together with allergens of higher molecular weight in paprika. In immunoblot-inhibition studies, crude mugwort, birch pollen, and celery extracts significantly reduced the IgE binding to pepper and paprika allergens. However, no inhibition was achieved with rBet v 1 and rBet v 2, suggesting that no homologs of these birch proteins act as allergens in pepper or paprika extracts, N-terminal sequence analysis of the 14- and 28-kDa pepper and 23-kDa paprika allergens revealed no homology to known allergens. The 28-kDa pepper allergen showed homology to a wheat germin protein, and the 23-kDa paprika allergen was identified as a homolog of a osmotin-like or pathogenesis-related protein in tomato. Therefore, we conclude that the IgE cross-reactivity in the mugwort-birch-celery-spice syndrome to the spices pepper and paprika is not caused by homologs of Bet v 1 and profilin, N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis of the main allergens in pepper and paprika indicate a relation to frequently occurring plant proteins.     

Cloning of the minor allergen Api g 4 profilin from celery (Apium graveolens) and its cross-reactivity with birch pollen profilin Bet v 2

BACKGROUND: Profilin is a panallergen that is recognized by IgE from about 20% of birch pollen- and plant food-allergic patients. A subgroup of celery-allergic patients shows IgE-reactivity with this minor allergen. To investigate the IgE-binding potential and cross-reactivity of celery profilin at the molecular level, this study was aimed at the cloning and immunological characterization of this allergen. OBJECTIVES: Cloning, expression and purification of profilin from celery tuber to characterize its immunological properties and its cross-reactivity with birch pollen profilin. METHODS: Cloning of celery profilin was performed by polymerase chain reaction using degenerated primers and a 5'RACE method for the identification of the unknown 5'-end of the cDNA. Expression was carried out in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using a modified vector pET-30a. The recombinant profilin was purified by affinity chromatography on poly L-proline coupled to sepharose. Immunological characterization was performed by immunoblotting, EAST and IgE-inhibition experiments. RESULTS: The coding region of the cDNA of celery profilin was identified as a 399-bp open reading frame, coding for a protein of 133 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 14.3 kDa. The deduced amino acid sequence of the corresponding protein showed high identity with other plant profilins (71-82%) recently described as allergens. Celery profilin was isolated as highly pure nonfusion protein. The IgE-reactivity of celery profilin was similar to that of natural protein. Seven of 17 celery-allergic patients tested presented specific IgE-antibodies to the recombinant protein tested by immunoblotting. Inhibition experiments showed high cross-reactivity of IgE with both profilins from celery and birch pollen. Moreover, the biological activity of recombinant celery profilin was demonstrated by a histamine release assay. CONCLUSIONS: Celery profilin is an important allergenic compound in celery and shows high homology to birch pollen profilin, Bet v 2. According to the revised IUIS allergen nomenclature, we suggest naming the celery profilin Api g 4. In addition to the cross-reacting major allergens Api g 1 and Bet v 1, birch pollinosis and associated allergies to celery can therefore additionally be explained by the cross-reactivity between homologous profilins. Moreover, recombinant Api g 4 may be used for target-specific diagnosis and structural analyses.     

IgE and IgG antibodies of patients with allergy to birch pollen as tools to define the allergen profile of Betula verrucosa*

IgE and IgG antibody response to birch pollen antigens were studied by means of immunoblotting experiments testing 58 sera from patients with Type I allergy to birch pollen. 56/58 patients showed IgE antibodies reactive with Bet v I, a 17 kilodalton (kD) pollen protein. 2D-electrophoresis/immunoblot revealed a heterogeneity of that protein. Ten spots (pH 4.9-5.9) could be detected, presumably representing differentially glycosylated isoallergens. In 33/58 patients, there was no evidence of IgE antibodies directed against allergens other than Bet v I. However, in 25/58 of patients' sera, 11 minor allergens (13, 15, 18, 27, 29, 32, 39, 44, 57, and 68 kD) with individual incidences from 1.7% to 17.2% were identified. All proteins were also recognized by the patients' IgG antibodies: in the case of Bet v I recognition was weak, whereas the IgG response to the minor allergens was pronounced. Sera from healthy individuals showed similar IgG antibody responses, but no IgG to the 15, 27, and 29 kD proteins. Our results suggest that IgG directed against minor allergens may function as trapping antibodies in healthy individuals. Too low or lacking amounts of anti-Bet v I IgG may facilitate an allergic reaction.     

A study of allergens in celery with cross-sensitivity to mugwort and birch pollens

Sixty-one sera with positive RAST to mugwort pollen ( Artemisiae vulgaris ) were submitted to RASTs for birch pollen ( Betula verrucosa) and celery ( Apium graveolens ). In 36 cases RAST results were positive for celery. In addition, 23 sera presented specific IgE to birch pollen. The binding of specific IgE to individual allergens in celery, mugwort pollen and birch pollen was studied by the immunoblotting technique. This involved electrophoretic separation of allergenic extracts, electrotransfer of proteins onto nitrocellulose sheets and sensitive immunoenzymatic detection. Eighteen sera had specific IgE binding to two celery components of molecular weight around 15 kD. All these sera also detected a 15 kD allergen in mugwort and two allergens in birch of 14 kD and 16 kD molecular weight. The sera that did not detect the 15 kD bands in celery failed to react with both the 15 kD mugwort component and the 14 and 16 kD birch components. Specific cross-inhibitions of the detection of these allergens on immunoblots were obtained by pre-incubation of the sera with crude extract of the three species. These results strongly suggest that such allergens display some structural identity and that they could be at the origin of some cases of crossed hypersensitivity to celery, mugwort pollen and birch pollen.     

The allergen profile of beech and oak pollen

Background Beech and oak pollen are potential allergen sources with a world‐wide distribution. Objective We aimed to characterize the allergen profile of beech and oak pollen and to study cross‐reactivities with birch and grass pollen allergens. Methods Sera from tree pollen‐allergic patients with evidence for beech and oak pollen sensitization from Basel, Switzerland, (n=23) and sera from birch pollen‐allergic patients from Vienna, Austria, (n=26) were compared in immunoblot experiments for IgE reactivity to birch (Betula pendula syn. verrucosa), beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus alba) pollen allergens. Subsequently, beech and oak pollen allergens were characterized by IgE inhibition experiments with purified recombinant and natural allergens and with allergen‐specific antibody probes. Birch‐, beech‐ and oak pollen‐specific IgE levels were determined by ELISA. Results Beech and oak pollen contain allergens that cross‐react with the birch pollen allergens Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and Bet v 4 and with the berberine bridge enzyme‐like allergen Phl p 4 from timothy grass pollen. Sera from Swiss and Austrian patients exhibited similar IgE reactivity profiles to birch, beech and oak pollen extracts. IgE levels to beech and oak pollen allergens were lower than those to birch pollen allergens. Conclusion IgE reactivity to beech pollen is mainly due to cross‐reactivity with birch pollen allergens, and a Phl p 4‐like molecule represented another predominant IgE‐reactive structure in oak pollen. The characterization of beech and oak pollen allergens and their cross‐reactivity is important for the diagnosis and treatment of beech and oak pollen allergy.     

Molecular and immunological characterization of novel weed pollen pan-allergens

Background:  Pan-allergens like profilins, calcium-binding proteins (CBPs), and nonspecific lipid transfer proteins have been suggested as possible specific markers for multiple pollen sensitizations, and could be used to predict cross-sensitization/poly-sensitization to several pollen allergens. Therefore, the purification and characterization of cross-reacting allergens in pollen is an extremely important task towards correct allergy diagnosis.
Methods:  New pan-allergens were identified by screening a ragweed pollen cDNA library with sera of patients allergic to mugwort pollen. Resulting proteins were cloned, expressed, purified and characterized.
Results:  We report complete cDNA sequences of two profilin isoforms (Amb a 8.01 and Amb a 8.02), two isoforms of a 2EF-hand CBP (Amb a 9.01 and Amb a 9.02), a new 3EF-hand CBP (Amb a 10) from ragweed pollen and a 2EF-hand CBP from mugwort (Art v 5). All these proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli , purified to homogeneity and characterized by biochemical and immunological means.
Conclusions:  The identified proteins are novel pan-allergens and can be used as diagnostic markers for polysensitization and used in component-resolved diagnosis.     

Anaphylaxis to camomile: clinical features and allergen cross-reactivity

BACKGROUND: Medicinal remedies of plant origin became very popular in recent years, and allergic reactions to these are on the rise, accordingly. Camomile has been reported as a potential trigger of severe anaphylaxis. The allergens responsible for camomile allergy have not been characterized as yet. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at reviewing the clinical symptomatology of immediate-type reactions in a series of patients sensitized to camomile and at characterizing the responsible allergens. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a history of allergy either to camomile or to spices or weeds, and a positive skin prick test/RAST to camomile were investigated for related allergic reactions to food, pollen and others. IgE-binding patterns were determined by immunoblotting, inhibition tests and deglycosylation experiments. RESULTS: Ten of 14 patients had a clinical history of immediate-type reactions to camomile, in some cases life threatening. Eleven subjects were also sensitized to mugwort in prick or RAST, eight to birch tree pollen. Using a polyclonal rabbit anti-Bet v 1 antibody, a homologue of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 was detected in two camomile blots. In four cases a group of higher molecular weight allergens (23-50 kDa) showed IgE-binding to camomile. All allergens proved heat stable. Binding was inhibited in variable degrees by extracts from celery roots, anize seeds and pollen from mugwort, birch and timothy grass. Deglycosylation experiments proved the presence of carbohydrate determinants in camomile which were not responsible for IgE-binding, though. Profilins (Bet v 2) were not detected in our camomile extracts. CONCLUSION: Incidence and risk of type I allergy to camomile may be underestimated. Concurrent sensitization to mugwort and birch pollen is not infrequent. Bet v 1 and noncarbohydrate higher molecular weight proteins were found to be eliciting allergens and are responsible for cross-reactivity with other foods and pollen.     

The impact of pollen-related food allergens on pollen allergy

Patients with birch pollen allergy frequently develop hypersensitivity reactions to certain foods, e.g. apples, celery, carrots and hazelnuts. These reactions are mainly caused by IgE-antibodies specific for the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, which cross-react with homologous proteins in these foods. Analyzing the T-cell response to Bet v 1-related food allergens revealed that these dietary proteins contain several distinct T-cell epitopes and activate Bet v 1-specific T cells to proliferate and produce cytokines. Several of these cross-reactive T-cell epitopes were not destroyed by simulated gastrointestinal digestion of food allergens and stimulated Bet v 1-specific T cells despite nonreactivity with IgE antibodies. Similarly, cooked food allergens did not elicit IgE-mediated symptoms (oral allergy syndromes) but caused T-cell-mediated late-phase reactions (deterioration of atopic eczema) in birch pollen-allergic patients with atopic dermatitis because thermal processing affected their conformational structure and not the primary amino acid sequence. Thus, T-cell cross-reactivity between Bet v 1 and related food allergens occurs independently of IgE-cross-reactivity in vitro and in vivo. We speculate that symptom-free consumption of pollen-related food allergens may have implications for the pollen-specific immune response of allergic individuals.     

Monoclonal antibodies against birch pollen allergens: characterization by immunoblotting and use for single-step affinity purification of the major allergen Bet v I

Two monoclonal antibodies against birch pollen proteins were produced by immunizing BALB/c mice with birch pollen extract. In immunoblotting experiments, antibody BIP 1 reacted with a 17-kilodalton (kD) protein considered to represent the major birch pollen allergen Bet v I. A second monoclonal antibody, BIP 3, reacted with 3 different birch pollen proteins of molecular weights 32, 36 and 68 kD of which the 36- and 68-kD proteins corresponded to minor allergens of birch pollen. Two-dimensional electrophoresis/immunoblotting experiments revealed that BIP 1 reacted with all Bet v I isoallergens, also identified by human IgE antibodies. Using BIP 1 coupled to Sepharose 4B as reverse immunosorbent, Bet v I was obtained in a single-step procedure and characterized as single band by SDS-PAGE.     

Isolation and characterization of messenger RNA from male inflorescences and pollen of the white birch (Betula verrucosa)

A glycoprotein with a molecular weight (MW) of 17 kilodaltons (kD), Bet v I, represents the major allergen of the white birch (Betula verrucosa, BV) and plays an important role in tree-pollen-induced type I allergic reactions. In order to characterize the major and also some minor allergens of BV, we investigated the IgE-binding properties of these allergens using immunoblot techniques. Normal and patients' sera were employed for this study. Furthermore, RNA from male inflorescences and from pollen of BV were isolated and purified by affinity chromatography on oligo-dT-cellulose. Poly(A)+-mRNA thus obtained was translated in vitro in a cell-free wheat germ system and the proteins synthesized were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The blots were incubated with normal human sera and with sera from patients allergic to birch pollen. Bound IgE antibodies were detected with 125I-labeled anti-IgE. We observed major IgE binding to a protein of an MW of 12.5 kD, and little IgE binding to a 17-kD protein, presumably Bet v I. Comparing the products of in vitro translation from mRNA preparations of mature pollen and of male inflorescences collected in June, October and February, little seasonal variations could be observed. As the in vitro translation system does not glycosylate proteins, our results show that the majority of IgE in patients' sera is not directed against the carbohydrate moieties of these allergens.     

Cross-reactive and species-specific immunoglobulin E epitopes of plant profilins: an experimental and structure-based analysis

BACKGROUND: Profilins are cross-reactive plant allergens responsible for multiple pollen sensitization and pollen-associated food allergy. While it is assumed that profilins from different species are immunologically equivalent, some studies suggest partial or even lacking IgE cross-reactivity between certain profilins. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to obtain a semi-quantitative assessment of the contributions of conserved and species-specific epitopes to IgE binding of plant profilins. METHODS: We compared model structures of profilins from timothy, mugwort, celery and bell pepper with crystal structures of birch and latex profilins. We predicted potential conformational epitopes that consisted of contiguous patches of at least 20% surface-exposed residues. Celery and timothy profilins were purified from their natural sources, and profilins from birch, mugwort, bell pepper and latex were expressed in Escherichia coli. The structural integrity of all purified proteins was confirmed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. IgE ELISAs and ELISA inhibitions using sera from 22 profilin-sensitized allergic patients were carried out. RESULTS: Peptide backbone conformations of all six profilins were highly similar. Nine variable epitopes and two containing high proportions of conserved residues were predicted. IgE from all sera bound to all tested profilins and the amounts were highly correlated. However, IgE inhibition experiments revealed that up to 60% of total IgE binding was mediated by species-specific epitopes. The extent of cross-reactivity among profilins from timothy, birch, latex and celery was greater than cross-reactivity to mugwort and bell pepper profilins. This pattern was mirrored by sequence similarities among one of the predicted variable epitopes. Patients with IgE to cross-reactive epitopes displayed allergic reactions to a greater number of plant foods than patients having IgE directed to species-specific epitopes. CONCLUSION: The large extent of cross-reactivity among plant profilins justifies using a single profilin for diagnosis. However, the fine specificity of IgE directed to variable epitopes may influence the clinical manifestation of profilin sensitization.     

A mimotope defined by phage display inhibits IgE binding to the plant panallergen profilin

Birch pollen and mugwort pollen allergies are often associated with hypersensitivity to plant foods. This clinical and serological cross-reactivity is mediated by IgE antibodies reacting with homologous proteins in pollen and food. Cross-reacting homologs of the important birch pollen allergen Bet v 2 (profilin) could be detected in other pollen, fruits, nuts, and vegetables, such as celery tuber. We purified IgG/IgE antibodies from the serum of an exclusively profilin-allergic patient using affinity columns either coupled with protein extracts from mugwort pollen, birch pollen, or celery tuber. Constrained and unconstrained random nonapeptide libraries were pooled and screened with the anti-profilin antibody preparations to define cross-reactive ligands. Specific ligands were enriched by successive panning rounds using the profilin-specific antibodies in series. After the last panning round enriched phage clones were screened with purified profilin-specific antibodies and IgE-binding clones were sequenced. Five out of eight positive clones (62.5 %) displayed the same circular peptide CAISGGYPVC. This peptide was synthesized and examined for its ability to inhibit IgE binding to blotted mugwort pollen, birch pollen, or celery tuber profilin. Inhibition studies showed reduction of IgE binding to profilins in all three protein extracts. As the sequence of the mimotope did not show any homology to the known birch profilin sequence this peptide is considered to mimic a common conformational IgE epitope for these examined profilins.     

Identification of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) pollen profilin as a cross-reactive allergen

BACKGROUND: Major allergens of oilseed rape (OSR) pollen with molecular weights of 6/8, 14 and between 27 and 69 kD have been described. The aim of the present study was to further characterize the 14-kD allergen. METHODS: The 14-kD protein was purified from OSR pollen extracts by poly-(L-proline) (PLP)-Sepharose affinity chromatography and characterized immunologically by means of allergic patients' IgE antibodies, profilin-specific rabbit antisera, Western blot and ELISA inhibition using recombinant birch profilin (rBet v 2), and skin prick testing. RESULTS: By PLP affinity chromatography, OSR pollen profilin was purified as a single protein of 14.5 kD and further identified as a profilin by three polyclonal rabbit antisera raised against ragweed and tobacco pollen profilin and the C-terminus of birch profilin. IgE binding of a human serum pool (n = 15) and four profilin-reactive sera to nitrocellulose-blotted OSR profilin was completely inhibited by 1 microg/ml rBet v 2 (birch profilin). Reciprocal ELISA inhibition using increasing concentrations of rBet v 2 and purified OSR profilin, respectively, showed that rBet v 2 strongly inhibits antibody binding to OSR profilin, whereas almost 100 times the amount of OSR profilin was needed to inhibit IgE binding to rBet v 2. Skin prick tests were positive (wheal >/=3 mm) with 5 microg/ml rBet v 2 in all three patients tested, and with OSR profilin in two patients at a concentration of 50 microg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: OSR pollen profilin shares IgE and IgG epitopes with Bet v 2 and other plant profilins and may represent a potentially relevant allergen for profilin-sensitized patients.     

How far can we simplify in vitro diagnostics for Fagales tree pollen allergy? A study with three whole pollen extracts and purified natural and recombinant allergens

BACKGROUND: Current diagnostic tests for Fagales tree pollen allergy are often composed of mixtures of pollen of birch, alder and hazel. Their complex composition hampers accurate standardization. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether mixtures of tree pollen extracts can be replaced by a single pollen species, and whether a single pollen species can be replaced by a limited number of purified natural or recombinant major allergens. METHODS: Sera (n = 1725) were selected on ground of a general suspicion for inhalant allergy, and tested in a RAST for birch, alder and hazel pollen. Sera with > 0.5 RU/mL for any of the three species were tested in a RAST for natural Bet v 1 and Bet v 2 as well as for recombinant versions of both allergens. RESULTS: Specific IgE antibodies (> 0.3 RU/mL) against birch, alder and hazel were found in 242, 298 and 292 sera, respectively. All sera with a positive RAST for alder and/or hazel and a negative RAST for birch were low-responder sera on alder and hazel, only five sera having a RAST value > 1.0 (all < 2.0). For all sera with a RAST > 0.5 RU/mL (n = 250), the mean of individual ratio's alder/birch and hazel/birch was 1.02 and 0.54, respectively. Of 223 of these sera, 63.2% had specific IgE against natural Bet v 1 and 63.7% against natural Bet v 2. When responses to both allergens were combined 93.7% were positive. The mean ratios Bet v 1 + 2/extract were 1.00, 1.04 and 2. 11 in case of birch, alder and hazel, respectively. For 211 sera the same analysis was performed with recombinant Bet v 1 and Bet v 2. Only six sera with Bet v 1-specific IgE (all < 0.5 RU/mL) were negative (< 0.3 RU/mL) on recombinant Bet v 1. For Bet v 2, 77/132 sera with specific IgE to the natural allergen did not react to the recombinant version. Twelve false-negatives had RAST values > 1.0 RU/mL. The mean of the individual recombinant/natural ratios was 0. 98 for Bet v 1 and 0.38 for Bet v 2 (P < 0.001). The mean ratio rBet v 1 + 2/birch was 0.75 with 17.5% false-negatives on the combination of recombinant allergens. CONCLUSION: Reliable in vitro diagnosis is possible with a single tree pollen extract (birch or alder). The same is true for purified natural Bet v 1 and Bet v 2. A combination of recombinant molecules is slightly less efficient.     

Specificities of IgE and IgG antibodies in patients with birch pollen allergy

58 sera from patients with established birch pollen allergy showed characteristic antibody-binding patterns in immunoblotting experiments. Regarding IgE, 56/58 patients recognized a protein of molecular weight (MW) 17 kilodaltons (kD), previously defined as Bet v I. 23/58 patients in addition reacted with a variety of 11 minor allergens with MWs ranging from 13 to 68 kD. A 13-kD protein was proved to represent an independent minor allergen. IgG binding in patients and healthy individuals was more pronounced on the minor allergens than on Bet v I. 3 different allergens were not detected by IgG of healthy individuals. In two-dimensional electrophoresis/immunoblot, a monoclonal antibody and human IgE (in both cases directed against Bet v I) detected a very similar cluster of spots, probably representing isoallergens of Bet v I.     

Characterization of allergens in kiwi fruit and detection of cross‐reactivities with allergens of birch pollen and related fruit allergens

The sera of 29 patients who suffered from pollen‐related food hypersensitivities and complained of allergic reactions to kiwi fruit and other tropical fruits were tested for specific IgE antibodies against kiwi fruit, apple, carrot, celery and birch pollen using an enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST). In 20 sera, specific IgE antibodies were detected against all five extracts. Sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/ immunoblot of kiwi fruit extract revealed two major allergens with molecular weights of approximately 43 and 67 kDa. In EAST inhibition assays, cross‐reactivities between kiwi fruit, apple, birch pollen and, to a lesser degree, carrot and celery were demonstrated. The cross‐reactivities seen between kiwi fruit, birch pollen and apple were not caused by the major allergen of birch pollen (Bet v 1). Allergens with molecular weights of approximately 68 kDa in birch pollen and 67 kDa in apple cross‐reacted with the allergens of kiwi fruit, as demonstrated by immunoblotinhibition. Profilins, which are known plant pan‐allergens, do not seem to be relevant allergens in kiwi fruit.     

Serological characterization of allergens in poppy seeds

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Poppy seeds in food can induce immediate-type allergic reactions ranging from mild local symptoms to severe anaphylactic reactions. Previous publications showed that poppy seeds cross-react with other plant-derived allergens. The IgE-binding components have not been defined so far. METHODS: We analysed sera from 11 patients with adverse reactions after ingestion of poppy seed-containing food by IgE-immunoblotting. Nine of 11 patients showed concomitant IgE binding to allergens of birch, mugwort or grass pollen in RAST-CAP, and suffered from characteristic seasonal symptoms. RESULTS: Ten of 11 patients showed IgE binding to a 45-kDa protein, 4/11 to a 34-kDa, 5/11 to a 17-kDa, 5/11 to a 14-kDa, and 3/11 to a 5-kDa component. Furthermore, individual IgE binding to proteins of 20, 25, 30 and 40 kDa proteins could be observed. Periodate treatment of blots markedly reduced the IgE binding capacity of the 40- and 45-kDa compounds, indicating the existence of IgE epitopes of the carbohydrate type. Inhibition studies indicated the presence of homologues of pollen allergens in extracts from poppy seeds, i.e. Bet v 1 and Bet v 2. CONCLUSION: The serological analysis showed IgE binding to protein and sugar components of poppy seeds. The 40- and 45-kDa allergens are glycoproteins and contain IgE binding carbohydrate moieties. Moreover, cross-reacting homologues of pollen allergens including Bet v 1 and profilin were detected in poppy seed extract.     

Detection of specific IgE antibodies in the sera of patients allergic to birch pollen using recombinant allergens Bet v 1, Bet v 2, Bet v 4: evaluation of different IgE reactivity profiles

BACKGROUND: Birch pollen is a significant cause of immediate hypersensitivity among susceptible subjects in temperate climates, affecting 5-54% of the population in western Europe. We examined the specific serum IgE antibodies towards recombinant allergens Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and Bet v 4 in birch-sensitive patients from the province of Cuneo, north-west Italy. METHODS: Sera were obtained from 372 patients with symptomatic birch pollen-induced allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. A subgroup of these patients suffered from oral allergy syndrome after eating apple. Their sera were evaluated for specific IgE against natural birch pollen and apple extract, as well as Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and Bet v 4 using Pharmacia CAP system (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). RESULTS: Of 372 patients 215 (57.80%) had serum-specific IgE towards Bet v 1. A total of 166 sera (44.62%) contained serum-specific IgE to Bet v 2, while Bet v 4 IgE reactivity was documented in 35 subjects (9.41%). Moreover, 146 (39.25%) patients were monosensitized to Bet v 1; 96 (25.81%) patients were monosensitized to Bet v 2; only four sera (1.08%) contained specific IgE towards Bet v 4. Thirty-nine sera (11.02%) did not contain specific IgE to these individual birch pollen allergens. Of course, all 372 sera (100%) had specific IgE against natural birch pollen extract, of which 162 (43.55%) contained specific IgE to apple extract (75.35% of Bet v 1 positive sera). CONCLUSION: In this study we observed that three birch pollen recombinant allergens alone, could sufficiently identify 90% of birch pollen-sensitive patients. Therefore, for a more precise IgE profile of patients allergic to birch, further purified birch pollen allergens (i.e. Bet v 6, Bet v 7, Bet v 8) will be required.