Receiver operating characteristic analysis on fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, and fructosamine on diabetes screening.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of HbA1c and fructosamine as alternatives to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for diabetes screening. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted on the above tests. Comparison among tests was based on the area under ROC curve of a test. World Health Organization criteria for classifying glucose tolerance status of the subjects was used. The study consisted of subjects (n = 583) who visited the clinic from September to October 1989 and all diabetic cases (n = 36) from November 1989 to March 1990, after excluding those less than 40 yr of age or with hypoglycemic therapies (469 were normal, 88 with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT], and 62 with diabetes). RESULTS: Area under ROC curve of HbA1c was not different from that of FPG. Area under curve of fructosamine was significantly smaller than that of FPG. For all tests, overall efficacy of a test to detect IGT and diabetes was considerably diminished compared with detection of diabetes alone. CONCLUSIONS: The discriminating ability of HbA1c is almost the same as that of FPG, therefore HbA1c is a good alternative to FPG. Fructosamine is not suitable for diabetes screening.     

空腹血糖联合糖化血红蛋白检测对糖尿病筛查的临床意义

目的评价联合应用空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测对糖尿病筛查的临床价值。方法对8669名特定人群,同时进行空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测,所得数据进行对比分析。结果单独以空腹血糖大于等于6.1mmol/L筛查出的糖尿病风险人群为743人,占总检测人数的8.6%;单独以糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)大于等于6%筛查出的糖尿病风险人群为627人,占总检测人数的7.2%;联合两种检测进行筛查,以两个指标中任何一个超过切点的都筛出来,可筛查出943人,风险筛出率为10.9%;通过统计学分析,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。结论空腹血糖或糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)单个指标进行糖尿病风险筛查,都会有一部分可疑人群无法筛出,二者联合应用,可以筛查出更多处于糖尿病风险的可疑人群。     

Admission glucose,fasting glucose,HbA1c levels and the SYNTAX score in non-diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography

Background

Pre-diabetic state is a major risk factor for the development of diabetes and cardiovascular events. Admission glucose, fasting glucose and HbA1c levels have an effect on prognosis in patients with pre-diabetes and in non-diabetic individuals. The aim of the present study was to investigate which of the following glucometabolic markers (admission glucose, fasting glucose and HbA1c levels) is correlated with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in non-diabetic patients.

Methods

CAD severity according to SYNTAX score was prospectively evaluated in 226 non-diabetic patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction or stable angina and underwent coronary angiography. Glucose intolerance was assessed by serum admission glucose, fasting glucose and HbA1c levels. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate which glucometabolic factor has the strongest correlation with CAD severity.

Results

HbA1c was the only glucometabolic factor associated with SYNTAX score above 22 (OR = 3.03, CI 95 % 1.03–8.9, p = 0.04). HbA1c was also significantly associated with CAD severity in subgroup analysis (MI and stable angina).

Conclusions

In non-diabetic patients with myocardial infarction or stable angina, HbA1c levels correlate with CAD severity as measured by the SYNTAX score. No correlation was found between admission glucose or fasting glucose levels and CAD severity.     

Targets and tactics: the relative importance of HbA1c,fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels to glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes

Background: The incidence of type 2 diabetes is reaching pandemic proportions, impacting patients and healthcare systems across the globe. Evidence suggests that a majority of patients are not achieving recommended blood glucose targets resulting in an increased risk of micro‐ and macro‐vascular complications. Aim: To review literature on the significance of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA_1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), their inter‐relationships and relative importance in the treatment of diabetes, and to provide practical guidance on effective monitoring of patients. Methods: Clinical guidelines on diabetes management and clinical and preclinical studies of glycaemic control identified through a publications database search were reviewed. Results: Glycaemic control remains fundamental to the successful management of diabetes. HbA_1c is the gold standard measure of glycaemic control but recent evidence suggests that postmeal hyperglycaemia also plays an important role in the aetiology of diabetes‐associated complications and control of PPG levels is vital to the achievement of recommended HbA_1c targets. Conclusions: The call for action on type 2 diabetes has never been more compelling; with a clear focus on strategies for glycaemic control, the impact of the diabetes pandemic can be limited.     

Contribution of postprandial versus interprandial blood glucose to HbA1c in type 1 diabetes on physiologic intensive therapy with lispro insulin at mealtime.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitate the contribution of postprandial blood glucose, which improves with the short-acting insulin analog lispro [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] in type 1 diabetes, to the overall 24-h blood glucose concentration and the long-term HbA1c concentration under conditions of different postabsorptive blood glucose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 24 type 1 diabetic patients on long-term intensive therapy with premeal human regular insulin (Hum-R) and bedtime NPH were randomly assigned to a continuation of Hum-R (group 1, n = 8), lispro (group 2, n = 8), or lispro + NPH (in variable proportions) administered at mealtime (group 3, n = 8) for 3 months, NPH administered at bedtime was continued in all three groups. Data from home blood glucose monitoring were collected, and a 24-h plasma glucose and insulin profile was obtained during a 2-day hospital visit to calculate areas under the postprandial glucose curve (3.5 h after breakfast, 3.5 h after lunch, and 3.0 h after dinner for a total of 10.0 h) and the postabsorptive blood glucose curve (the remaining 14.0 h out of 24.0 h) (AUC). Eight nondiabetic subjects were also studied. RESULTS: The substitution of Hum-R with lispro (group 2) resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose, but greater postabsorptive blood glucose (P < 0.05 vs. group 1). The postprandial blood glucose AUC was lower (161 +/- 19 vs. 167 +/- 20 mg.100 ml-1.h-1), but the postabsorptive blood glucose AUC was greater (155 +/- 22 vs. 142 +/- 19 mg.100 ml-1.h-1) (P < 0.05). Therefore, the 24-h blood glucose AUC was no different (NS). Consequently, HbA1c was no different (NS). This occurred because in group 2, mealtime lispro resulted in normal prandial plasma insulin, but also resulted in lower interprandial concentration (P < 0.05 vs. group 1). When NPH was added to lispro (30% at breakfast, 40% at lunch, 10% at dinner) in group 3, postabsorptive plasma insulin was similar to group 1 (NS), in group 3, the postprandial blood glucose AUC (153 +/- 17 mg.100 ml-1.h-1) was lower and the postabsorptive blood glucose AUC was no different, as compared with group 1 (NS). Therefore, the 24-h blood glucose AUC was lower (147 +/- 17 vs. 155 +/- 21 and 158 +/- 20 mg.100 ml-1.h-1), and HbA1c was lower (6.41 +/- 0.12 vs. 6.84 +/- 0.2 and 6.96 +/- 0.2% (groups 3, 1, and 2 respectively, P < 0.05). Frequency of hypoglycemia was greater in group 2 (P < 0.05), but not in group 3 (NS) vs. group 1.     

Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c predicts the progression to diabetes in Chinese subjects

OBJECTIVE: We have previously suggested using the paired values of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c to identify potential diabetic subjects. In this article, we followed up on 208 nondiabetic subjects and examined their rates of progression to diabetes. We analyzed their likelihood of becoming diabetic according to their baseline FPG and HbA1c concentrations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1995, 2,877 Chinese subjects with risk factors for diabetes underwent screening. Of these, 2,250 had FPG <7.8 mmol/l and 2-h plasma glucose (PG) <11.1 mmol/l. Of these 2,250 subjects, 265 were randomly recruited for an annual oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) until they progressed to develop diabetes. Of those 265 subjects, 57 had baseline FPG > or =7.0 mmol/l and were excluded from the present analysis. Hence, the progression of glucose tolerance in 208 subjects who were nondiabetic according to the new American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria (FPG < 7.0 mmol/l and 2-h PG < 11.1 mmol/l) was examined RESULTS: Of the 208 nondiabetic subjects, 26 (12.5%) were men and 182 (87.5%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 1.60 +/- 1.16 years (range 1-7, median 1), 44 (21.2%) progressed to develop diabetes and 164 (78.8%) remained nondiabetic. Those who were diabetic at the end of the study had a high likelihood ratio (LR) of 9.3 to have baseline FPG > or =6.1 mmol/l and baseline HbA1c > or =6.1%. This was compared with a low LR of 0.6-1.1 in diabetic subjects who had either FPG <6.1 mmol/l or HbA1c <6.1% or both at baseline. The crude rate of progression to diabetes was more than five times higher (44.1 vs. 8.1%) in those whose baseline FPG was > or =6.1 mmol/l and baseline HbA1c was > or =6.1% compared with those whose baseline FPG was <6.1 mmol/l and baseline HbA1c was <6.1%. CONCLUSIONS: For Chinese subjects with risk factors for glucose intolerance, the use of paired FPG and HbA1c values helped to identify potential diabetic subjects. Those with an FPG > or =6.1 mmol/l and HbA1c > or =6.1% had a rate of progression to diabetes more than five times higher than those with an FPG <6.1 mmol/l and an HbA1c <6.1% after a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. Those with an FPG > or =6.1 but <7.0 mmol/l, especially if their HbA1c was > or =6.1%, should undergo an OGTT to confirm diabetes. Subjects with an FPG <6.1 mmol/l and/or an HbA1c <6.1% should have regular screening using the paired values of FPG and HbA1c.     

Diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and elevated HbA1c in U.S. adolescents: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OBJECTIVE: Using population-based data, we estimated the prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and elevated HbA1c (>6%) levels in U.S. adolescents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) examined a representative sample of the U.S. population, which included 2,867 adolescents aged 12-19 years who had serum glucose measured. RESULTS: A total of 13 adolescents in the sample were considered to have diabetes; 9 reported using insulin, 2 reported using oral agents only, and 2 did not report any treatment but had high glucose levels (> or = 11.1 mmol/l regardless of length of fast or > or = 7.0 mmol/l after an 8-h fast). Four of these cases (31% of the sample with diabetes) were considered to have type 2 diabetes. The estimated prevalence of diabetes (all types) per 100 adolescents ages 12-19 years was 0.41% (95% confidence interval 0-0.86). The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose (> or = 6.1 mmol/l) among adolescents without diabetes who had fasted for at least 8 h was 1.76% (0.02-3.50). The prevalence of elevated HbA1c (>6%) was 0.39% (0.04-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: National data reflect the presence of type 2 diabetes in U.S. adolescents, but the survey sample size was not large enough to obtain precise prevalence estimates because of the relatively low prevalence.     

Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c)

OBJECTIVE: The exact contributions of postprandial and fasting glucose increments to overall hyperglycemia remain controversial. The discrepancies between the data published previously might be caused by the interference of several factors. To test the effect of overall glycemic control itself, we analyzed the diurnal glycemic profiles of type 2 diabetic patients investigated at different levels of HbA(1c). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 290 non-insulin- and non-acarbose-using patients with type 2 diabetes, plasma glucose (PG) concentrations were determined at fasting (8:00 A.M.) and during postprandial and postabsorptive periods (at 11:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 5:00 P.M.). The areas under the curve above fasting PG concentrations (AUC(1)) and >6.1 mmol/l (AUC(2)) were calculated for further evaluation of the relative contributions of postprandial (AUC(1)/AUC(2), %) and fasting [(AUC(2) - AUC(1))/AUC(2), %] PG increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia. The data were compared over quintiles of HbA(1c). RESULTS: The relative contribution of postprandial glucose decreased progressively from the lowest (69.7%) to the highest quintile of HbA(1c) (30.5%, P < 0.001), whereas the relative contribution of fasting glucose increased gradually with increasing levels of HbA(1c): 30.3% in the lowest vs. 69.5% in the highest quintile (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The relative contribution of postprandial glucose excursions is predominant in fairly controlled patients, whereas the contribution of fasting hyperglycemia increases gradually with diabetes worsening. These results could therefore provide a unifying explanation for the discrepancies as observed in previous studies.     

糖化血红蛋白联合空腹血糖筛查2型糖尿病高危人群的临床意义

目的了解糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)筛查糖尿病和糖代谢受损的敏感性并与空腹血糖(FBG)进行比较。方法对400例无糖尿病病史的糖尿病高危人群同时检测FBG和HbA1c,据空腹血糖水平分为三组:A1组:FBG<6.1 mmol/L,计336例,A2组:FBG 6.1-6.9 mmol/L,45例,A3组FBG≥7.0 mmol/L,19例。结果 (1)400例人群中,HbA1c≥6.0%,88例,异常率为22.0%;FBG≥6.1mmol/L,54例,异常率13.5.%,HbA1c的异常率高于FBG,P<0.05。(2)A1组HbA1c>≥6.0%,29例,占8.6%;A2组HbA1c≥6.0%,41例,占91.1%;A3组HbA1c≥6.0%,18例,占94.7%;(3)400例人群中,HbA1c≥6.0%或FBG≥6.1mmol/L,93例,异常率23.3%%。结论 HbA1c筛查糖尿病高危人群血糖异常的敏感性高于空腹血糖,两者联合检查有助发现更多糖代谢异常的患者。     

空腹血糖及糖化血红蛋白用于筛查糖耐量减退的比较性研究

目的比较空腹血糖（FPG）和糖化血红蛋白（HbAlc）在筛查糖耐量减退（IGT）中的应用价值。方法到我院门诊为明确有无血糖异常而就诊者336人，测定空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白，并行口服葡萄糖耐量试验（OGTT）。结果按照1999年WHO的DM诊断标准，本研究人群空腹血糖〈6．1者124例，≥6．1-〈7．0者56例，≥7．0者156例；糖化血红蛋白〈6．1者84例，≥6．1者252例；OGTT2 hPG〈7．8者92例，≥7．8-〈11．1者99例，≥11．1者145例。结论糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖均不适用于筛查IGT人群，但糖化血红蛋白比空腹血糖提示病人是否存在血糖异常更敏感。     

Relationship of fasting and hourly blood glucose levels to HbA1c values: safety, accuracy, and improvements in glucose profiles obtained using a 7-day continuous glucose sensor

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of 7-day transcutaneous, real-time, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighty-six subjects were enrolled at five U.S. centers. Subjects wore a sensor inserted under the skin of the abdomen for 7 days during each of three consecutive periods. Data were blinded during period 1 and unblinded during periods 2 and 3. RESULTS: Of the 6,811 matched self-monitoring of blood glucose to sensor values prospectively analyzed, 97.2% fell in the Clarke error grid zones A and B, and median absolute relative difference was 11.4%. After unblinding, subjects reduced time spent at <55 mg/dl by 0.3 h/day, reduced time spent at >240 mg/dl by 1.5 h/day, and increased time in the target zone (81-140 mg/dl) by 1.4 h/day (P < 0.05 for all three comparisons). Improvements were seen in both types 1 and 2 diabetes and with use of both multiple daily injections and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Modal day graphs were generated in six groups of subjects based on HbA1c (A1C) (10%). Mean glucose levels from midnight to 7:00 a.m. (fasting and dawn phenomenon periods) were only normal for subjects with A1C 相似文献   

2型糖尿病糖化血红蛋白与全天不同时间血糖水平的关系

目的探讨2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)与全天不同时间血糖水平的关系。方法171例2型糖尿病患者检测三餐前30min、餐后2h及晚睡前共7次血糖水平,并计算平均血糖水平(MBG),同时测定HbA1c。按HbA1c水平不同将患者分为2组血糖控制尚可组(HbA1c≤7.5%)和控制差组(HbA1c>7.5%)。直线回归相关分析总体及各组HbA1c与MBG、全天7次血糖的相关性。结果MBG与HbA1c呈显著正相关(r=0.851,P<0.001),MBG=-0.70+1.30×HbA1c;HbA1c与全天7次血糖水平均呈正相关,逐步多元线形回归分析示HbA1c与空腹、晚餐后、午餐后及早餐后血糖相关。HbA1c≤7.5%组的HbA1c与晚餐后、午餐后及午餐前血糖相关,而HbA1c>7.5%组HbA1c与空腹、晚餐后、午餐后及早餐后血糖相关。结论HbA1c受全天平均血糖水平的影响,血糖控制尚可组晚餐后、午餐后及午餐前的血糖对HbA1c影响明显,而血糖控制差组空腹、晚餐后、午餐后及早餐后的血糖对HbA1c影响明显。     

Impaired glucose tolerance is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but not impaired fasting glucose. The Funagata Diabetes Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the new category of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) recently proposed by the Expert Committee of the American Diabetes Association is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Death certificates and residence transfer documents from the cohort population consisting of participants of the diabetes prevalence study in Funagata, Yamagata prefecture, Japan, 1990-1992, were analyzed up through the end of 1996. First, the cohort population was classified into three groups: normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 2,016), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (n = 382), and diabetic (n = 253). Then the same population was reclassified into normal fasting glucose (NFG), IFG, and diabetic. The cumulative survival rates among the groups were compared using the classical life-table method, and age-adjusted analyses, the person-year method, and Cox's proportional hazard model were adopted. RESULTS: At the end of seven observed years, the cumulative survival rates from cardiovascular disease of IGT and diabetes were 0.962 and 0.954, respectively, both significantly lower than that of NGT (0.988). The Cox's proportional hazard model analysis showed that the hazard ratio of IGT to NGT on death from cardiovascular disease was 2.219 (95% CI 1.076-4.577). However, the cumulative survival rate of IFG from cardiovascular disease was 0.977, not significantly lower than that of NFG (0.985). The Cox's hazard ratio of IFG to NFG on death from cardiovascular disease was 1.136 (0.345-3.734), which was not significant either. CONCLUSIONS: IGT was a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but IFG was not.     

HbA_(1c)诊断2型糖尿病特性观察及在空腹血糖正常人群中的分布特征研究

目的观察糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)诊断2型糖尿病(T2DM)的特点及其在空腹血糖(FPG)正常者中的分布情况。方法同时测定729例FPG正常者尿酸(UA)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C);用免疫抑制比浊法测定247例接受口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)者(包括T2DM 164例、糖耐量受损41例、空腹血糖受损18例、糖耐量正常者24例)的HbA1c,以OGTT和临床诊断结果作为标准,绘制HbA1c和FPG的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定HbA1c诊断T2DM的切点,通过对比分析观察不同性别及同性别不同年龄组中HbA1c的分布情况。结果免疫抑制比浊法测定HbA1c诊断T2DM的切点为6.36%,诊断灵敏度为86.50%、特异性为90.60%、阳性预测值为94.63%、阴性预测值为76.50%、曲线下面积为0.944[95%可信区间(CI):0.917~0.971],FPG7.0 mmol/L时诊断糖尿病的灵敏度为85.90%、特异性为93.80%、曲线下的面积为0.957[95%CI:0.932~0.981]。FPG正常者中女性HbA1c、HDL-C水平明显高于男性(P=0.000),男性血红蛋白(Hb)、FPG、UA、TG水平高于女性(P值分别为0.000、0.020、0.000、0.000)。随着年龄的增加,男、女性HbA1c、FPG、TC和LDL-C均有增高的趋势;特别是在60岁以后,女性HbA1c升高更高明显;但HDL-C在男性中有上升的趋势,在女性中有下降的趋势。结论免疫抑制比浊法测定HbA1c诊断T2DM的切点为6.36%,随着年龄的增加要定期测定HbA1c,以达到预防糖尿病的目的。