The importance of waist circumference in the definition of metabolic syndrome: prospective analyses of mortality in men

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive ability of the National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP), revised NCEP (NCEP-R), and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) metabolic syndrome criteria for mortality risk, and to examine the effects of waist circumference on mortality within the context of these criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The sample included 20,789 white, non-Hispanic men 20-83 years of age from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. The main outcome measures were all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality over 11.4 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The proportions of men with the metabolic syndrome were 19.7, 27, and 30% at baseline, respectively, according to NCEP, NCEP-R, and IDF criteria. A total of 632 deaths (213 CVD) occurred. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs of all-cause mortality were 1.36 (1.14-1.62), 1.31 (1.11-1.54), and 1.26 (1.07-1.49) for the NCEP, NCEP-R, and IDF definitions, respectively. The corresponding RRs for CVD mortality were 1.79 (1.35-2.37), 1.67 (1.27-2.19), and 1.67 (1.27-2.20). Additionally, there was a significant trend for a higher risk of CVD mortality across waist circumference categories (<94, 94-102, and >102 cm) among men with at least two additional metabolic syndrome risk factors (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The prediction of mortality with IDF and NCEP metabolic syndrome criteria was comparable in men. Waist circumference is a valuable component of metabolic syndrome; however, the IDF requirement of an elevated waist circumference warrants caution given that a large proportion of men with normal waist circumference have multiple risk factors and an increased risk of mortality.     

The metabolic syndrome as predictor of type 2 diabetes: the San Antonio heart study

OBJECTIVE: The oral glucose tolerance test identifies high-risk subjects for diabetes, but it is costly and inconvenient. To find better predictors of type 2 diabetes, we evaluated two different definitions of the metabolic syndrome because insulin resistance, which is commonly associated with this clustering of metabolic factors, frequently precedes the onset of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared the ability of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) definition, a modified version of the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) definition that excludes the 2-h glucose requirement, and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) to predict incident type 2 diabetes. In the San Antonio Heart Study, 1734 participants completed a 7- to 8-year follow-up examination. RESULTS: IGT and the NCEP definition had higher sensitivity than the modified WHO definition (51.9, 52.8, and 42.8%, respectively). IGT had a higher positive predictive value than the NCEP and modified WHO definitions (43.0, 30.8, and 30.4%, respectively). The combination of the IGT and NCEP definitions increased the sensitivity to 70.8% with an acceptable positive predictive value of 29.7%. Risk for incidence of type 2 diabetes using the NCEP definition was independent of other risk factors, including IGT and fasting insulin (odds ratio 3.30, 95% CI 2.27-4.80). The NCEP definition performed better with fasting glucose >or=5.4 mmol/l (sensitivity 62.0% and positive predictive value 30.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic syndrome predicts diabetes independently of other factors. However, the NCEP definition performs better than the modified 1999 WHO definition. Lowering the fasting glucose cutoff to 5.4 mmol/l improves the prediction of diabetes by the metabolic syndrome.     

Metabolic syndrome as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Casale Monferrato Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in an 11-year survival follow-up of a population-based cohort of type 2 diabetes the predictive role of World Health Organization-defined metabolic syndrome, independent of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During the follow-up (1991-2001), 1,565 patients were regularly examined with centralized measurements of HbA(1c). The independent role of the metabolic syndrome as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: At baseline, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 75.6% (95% CI 73.6-77.9). Results are based on 685 deaths (520 with the metabolic syndrome and 165 without it) in 10,890.2 person-years of observations. With respect to subjects without the metabolic syndrome, those with the metabolic syndrome had a similar hazard ratio (HR) of cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, total cholesterol level, and coronary heart disease. In contrast, relative to subjects with diabetes only, the HR of subjects with only one component of the syndrome was 2.92 (1.16-7.33), independent of other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: We found that 1) the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a population-based cohort of type 2 diabetes is high (75.6%); 2) the metabolic syndrome is not a predictor of 11-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality; and 3) more than twofold higher cardiovascular risk, independent of conventional risk factors, is evident in diabetic subjects with only one component of the syndrome compared with those with diabetes only. Categorizing type 2 diabetic subjects as having or not having the metabolic syndrome does not provide further prediction compared with the knowledge of its single components.     

Epidemiology and treatment of the metabolic syndrome

Recent definitions of the metabolic syndrome from the World Health Organization (WHO) and National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have given us a clearer picture of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and the risks it poses for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Solid epidemiological and trial evidence support lifestyle changes as the main modifiable risk factors, including abdominal obesity, sedentary lifestyle and a diet rich in saturated fat and low in fiber content, in the treatment of individual components of the metabolic syndrome. Physical activity may prevent the metabolic syndrome as defined by the WHO and NCEP, but the evidence for lifestyle changes using these definitions is still sparse. No trials on the treatment of the metabolic syndrome to prevent diabetes have been published. However, both the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and the Diabetes Prevention Program found that moderate lifestyle interventions in persons with impaired glucose tolerance, a condition related to the metabolic syndrome. decreased the incidence of type 2 diabetes by 58%. Some drugs may also prevent diabetes. Further research on lifestyle modifications in the prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome, and on how best to promote lifestyle changes, is needed. In the meantime, efforts to curb obesity and overweight, increase physical activity and improve compliance with current dietary recommendations should continue.     

Metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes: current state of the evidence

OBJECTIVE—Our objective was to perform a quantitative review of prospective studies examining the association between the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Using the title terms “diabetes” and “metabolic syndrome” in PubMed, we searched for articles published since 1998.RESULTS—Based on the results from 16 cohorts, we performed a meta-analysis of estimates of relative risk (RR) and incident diabetes. The random-effects summary RRs were 5.17 (95% CI 3.99–6.69) for the 1999 World Health Organization definition (ten cohorts); 4.45 (2.41–8.22) for the 1999 European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance definition (four cohorts); 3.53 (2.84–4.39) for the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program definition (thirteen cohorts); 5.12 (3.26–8.05) for the 2005 American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute definition (five cohorts); and 4.42 (3.30–5.92) for the 2005 International Diabetes Federation definition (nine cohorts). The fixed-effects summary RR for the 2004 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association definition was 5.16 (4.43–6.00) (six cohorts). Higher number of abnormal components was strongly related to incident diabetes. Compared with participants without an abnormality, estimates of RR for those with four or more abnormal components ranged from 10.88 to 24.4. Limited evidence suggests fasting glucose alone may be as good as metabolic syndrome for diabetes prediction.CONCLUSIONS—The metabolic syndrome, however defined, has a stronger association with incident diabetes than that previously demonstrated for coronary heart disease. Its clinical value for diabetes prediction remains uncertain.Since major organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR), and the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) released definitions of the metabolic syndrome, it has received a great deal of attention in the scientific literature. Much has been learned about the many facets of the syndrome, including its prevalence, incidence, and risks of leading to the development other conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes.Because of the controversy that has enveloped the concept of the metabolic syndrome, a thorough understanding of the association between the syndrome and diabetes—one of the main risks for people with the metabolic syndrome—is critical to furthering the debate about the syndrome''s scientific relevance. At the time of a previous quantitative review, only a limited number of prospective studies of the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes were available (1). Since that review, additional definitions of the syndrome have joined the previous ones, and the results of more prospective studies have been published. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to provide an updated quantitative review of the estimates of relative risk (RR) from prospective studies of the association between the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes. In addition, we summarize other pertinent findings of these prospective studies. We also try to place the results into clinical context by comparing metabolic syndrome assessment with other, potentially simpler methods of assessing risk of incident diabetes.     

The National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III, International Diabetes Federation, and World Health Organization definitions of the metabolic syndrome as predictors of incident cardiovascular disease and diabetes

OBJECTIVE: The clinical value of metabolic syndrome is uncertain. Thus, we examined cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes risk prediction by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)-Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII), International Diabetes Federation, and World Health Organization definitions of the metabolic syndrome. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the risks associated with metabolic syndrome, the NCEP multiple risk factor categories, and 2-h glucose values in the San Antonio Heart Study (n = 2,559; age range 25-64 years; 7.4 years of follow-up). RESULTS: Both ATPIII metabolic syndrome plus age > or = 45 years (odds ratio 9.25 [95% CI 4.85-17.7]) and multiple (two or more) risk factors plus a 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of 10-20% (11.9 [6.00-23.6]) had similar CVD risk in men without CHD, as well as CHD risk equivalents. In women counterparts, multiple (two or more) risk factors plus a 10-year CHD risk of 10-20% was infrequent (10 of 1,254). However, either a 10-year CHD risk of 5-20% (7.72 [3.42-17.4]) or ATPIII metabolic syndrome plus age > or = 55 years (4.98 [2.08-12.0]) predicted CVD. ATPIII metabolic syndrome increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a model containing age, sex, ethnic origin, family history of diabetes, and 2-h and fasting glucose values (0.857 vs. 0.842, P = 0.013). All three metabolic syndrome definitions imparted similar CVD and diabetes risks. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome is associated with a significant CVD risk, particularly in men aged > or = 45 years and women aged > or = 55 years. The metabolic syndrome predicts diabetes beyond glucose intolerance alone.     

Epidemiology and treatment of the metabolic syndrome

Recent definitions of the metabolic syndrome from the World Health Organization (WHO) and National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have given us a clearer picture of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and the risks it poses for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Solid epidemiological and trial evidence support lifestyle changes as the main modifiable risk factors, including abdominal obesity, sedentary lifestyle and a diet rich in saturated fat and low in fiber content, in the treatment of individual components of the metabolic syndrome. Physical activity may prevent the metabolic syndrome as defined by the WHO and NCEP, but the evidence for lifestyle changes using these definitions is still sparse. No trials on the treatment of the metabolic syndrome to prevent diabetes have been published. However, both the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and the Diabetes Prevention Program found that moderate lifestyle interventions in persons with impaired glucose tolerance, a condition related to the metabolic syndrome, decreased the incidence of type 2 diabetes by 58%. Some drugs may also prevent diabetes. Further research on lifestyle modifications in the prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome, and on how best to promote lifestyle changes, is needed. In the meantime, efforts to curb obesity and overweight, increase physical activity and improve compliance with current dietary recommendations should continue.     

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of and the cardiovascular risk associated with the metabolic syndrome using the new definition proposed by the World Health Organization RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 4,483 subjects aged 35-70 years participating in a large family study of type 2 diabetes in Finland and Sweden (the Botnia study) were included in the analysis of cardiovascular risk associated with the metabolic syndrome. In subjects who had type 2 diabetes (n = 1,697), impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (n = 798) or insulin-resistance with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 1,988), the metabolic syndrome was defined as presence of at least two of the following risk factors: obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or microalbuminuria. Cardiovascular mortality was assessed in 3,606 subjects with a median follow-up of 6.9 years. RESULTS: In women and men, respectively, the metabolic syndrome was seen in 10 and 15% of subjects with NGT, 42 and 64% of those with IFG/IGT, and 78 and 84% of those with type 2 diabetes. The risk for coronary heart disease and stroke was increased threefold in subjects with the syndrome (P < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was markedly increased in subjects with the metabolic syndrome (12.0 vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001). Of the individual components of the metabolic syndrome, microalbuminuria conferred the strongest risk of cardiovascular death (RR 2.80; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The WHO definition of the metabolic syndrome identifies subjects with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and offers a tool for comparison of results from diferent studies.     

Similar 9-year mortality risks and reproducibility for the World Health Organization and American Diabetes Association glucose tolerance categories: the Hoorn Study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risks of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) glucose tolerance categories after 9 years of follow-up in the Hoorn Study and to study the test-retest reproducibility of those categories. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this population-based cohort study of 2,468 elderly men and women, subjects were classified according to both the WHO and the ADA criteria. Causes of death were extracted from the medical records. Age- and sex-adjusted relative risks were estimated by Cox's proportional hazards model. Reproducibility of the diagnostic criteria was assessed in a sample of 1,109 subjects with duplicate oral glucose tolerance tests. RESULTS: Subjects with known diabetes had a four to five times higher risk of all-cause and CVD mortality compared with normal subjects (P<0.05). The relative risks of all-cause mortality were 1.67 (95% CI 1.09-2.57) and 1.56 (1.00-2.43) for newly diagnosed diabetic subjects according to the WHO and ADA criteria, respectively. The WHO and ADA criteria had similar levels of reproducibility The overall K was 0.59 (0.54-0.64) for WHO criteria and 0.61 (0.56-0.66) for ADA criteria. For the category of newly diagnosed diabetes according to WHO or ADA, the percentages of agreement for the second test compared with the first test were 77% (85/110) and 74% (74/100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both sets of diagnostic criteria identify criteria-specific diabetic subjects with an increased mortality risk compared with normal subjects, and the reproducibility of both criteria is similar.     

The metabolic syndrome in older individuals: prevalence and prediction of cardiovascular events: the Cardiovascular Health Study

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, a potent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), has not been adequately explored in older individuals. Moreover, two sets of criteria have been proposed for the definition of metabolic syndrome, one by the World Health Organization (WHO) and one by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATPIII). We therefore investigated the prevalence of this syndrome in a subgroup of older participants from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) who were free of CVD at baseline. We also compared the prognostic significance of the two definitions of the metabolic syndrome. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2,175 subjects from the CHS who were free of CVD at baseline and not taking antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications were studied. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was assessed with both the WHO and ATPIII criteria. The incidence of coronary or cerebrovascular disease was ascertained during a median follow-up time of 4.1 years. RESULTS: Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 28.1% by ATPIII criteria and 21.0% by WHO criteria. The two sets of criteria provided concordant classification for 80.6% of participants. Multivariate Cox propotional hazard models showed that the metabolic syndrome defined with the ATPIII criteria, but not with the WHO criteria, was an independent predictor of coronary or cerebrovascular events and was associated with a 38% increased risk (hazard ratio 1.38 [95% CI 1.06-1.79], P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in older individuals is approximately 21-28% (depending on the definition used). The two sets of criteria have 80% concordance in classifying subjects. As defined by the ATPIII criteria, the metabolic syndrome yields independent prognostic information, even after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the individual domains of the metabolic syndrome.     

Metabolic Syndrome as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease, Mortality, and Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive value of the metabolic syndrome in patients with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were from the prospective Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study (n = 3,783): mean age 37 ± 12 years and diabetes duration 23 ± 12 years. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to World Health Organization (WHO), National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions. Follow-up time was median 5.5 years (interquartile range 3.7–6.7). Mortality data were complete, whereas morbidity data were available in 69% of the patients.

RESULTS

The WHO definition was associated with a 2.1-fold increased risk of cardiovascular events and a 2.5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular- and diabetes-related mortality, after adjustment for traditional risk factors and diabetic nephropathy. The NCEP definition did not predict outcomes when adjusted for nephropathy but markedly added to the risk associated with elevated albuminuria alone (P < 0.001). The IDF definition did not predict outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolic syndrome is a risk factor, beyond albuminuria, for cardiovascular morbidity and diabetes-related mortality in type 1 diabetes.Type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, which is largely, but not totally, explained by the presence of diabetic nephropathy (1). The metabolic syndrome, a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors, increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and chronic renal disease in the general population and in patients with type 2 diabetes (2–4). The metabolic syndrome is common in patients with type 1 diabetes (5–7), but its role as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and diabetic nephropathy is less clear (8,9). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of the different definitions of the metabolic syndrome for cardiovascular events, cardiovascular- and diabetes-related mortality, and the progression of renal disease in type 1 diabetes.     

Screening and risk stratification of patients with the metabolic syndrome and diabetes

The metabolic syndrome is a clustering of risk factors known to promote or increase the risk for development of cardiovascular disease. Recent estimates demonstrate that approximately one-third of the adult population of developed countries are characterized with metabolic syndrome by different definitions. Metabolic syndrome, even in the absence of diabetes, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality, as well as an increased risk for the development of diabetes. Patients with diabetes are considered a cardiovascular risk equivalent, and warrant aggressive management of underlying risk factors to optimize prevention of cardiovascular disease. Initial evaluation of coronary heart disease risk involves global risk estimation using Framingham or other algorithms for risk prediction. Furthermore, consideration of screening for novel risk factors, such as C-reactive protein, as well as subclinical atherosclerosis (as assessed by carotid ultrasound, computed tomography or ankle–brachial index), can further refine the estimation of future cardiovascular disease risk. The presence of subclinical atherosclerosis or elevated levels of C-reactive protein can potentially modify recommended treatment goals for lipid and other cardiovascular risk factors.     

Screening and risk stratification of patients with the metabolic syndrome and diabetes

The metabolic syndrome is a clustering of risk factors known to promote or increase the risk for development of cardiovascular disease. Recent estimates demonstrate that approximately one-third of the adult population of developed countries are characterized with metabolic syndrome by different definitions. Metabolic syndrome, even in the absence of diabetes, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality, as well as an increased risk for the development of diabetes. Patients with diabetes are considered a cardiovascular risk equivalent, and warrant aggressive management of underlying risk factors to optimize prevention of cardiovascular disease. Initial evaluation of coronary heart disease risk involves global risk estimation using Framingham or other algorithms for risk prediction. Furthermore, consideration of screening for novel risk factors, such as C-reactive protein, as well as subclinical atherosclerosis (as assessed by carotid ultrasound, computed tomography or ankle-brachial index), can further refine the estimation of future cardiovascular disease risk. The presence of subclinical atherosclerosis or elevated levels of C-reactive protein can potentially modify recommended treatment goals for lipid and other cardiovascular risk factors.     

Low levels of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness predict development of the metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the association of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and cardiorespiratory fitness with development of the metabolic syndrome, which predisposes diseases such as diabetes and atherosclerosis. We studied the associations of LTPA and cardiorespiratory fitness with development of the metabolic syndrome (World Health Organization [WHO] and the National Cholesterol Education Program [NCEP] definitions). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: LTPA over the previous 12 months, VO(2max) (ml. kg(-1). min(-1)), and cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors were assessed in a population-based cohort of 612 middle-aged men without the metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: At the 4-year follow-up, 107 men had metabolic syndrome (WHO definition). Men engaging in >3 h/week of moderate or vigorous LTPA were half as likely as sedentary men to have the metabolic syndrome after adjustment for major confounders (age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, and socioeconomic status) or potentially mediating factors (insulin, glucose, lipids, and blood pressure), especially in high-risk men. Vigorous LTPA had an even stronger inverse association, particularly in unfit men. Men in the upper third of VO(2max) were 75% less likely than unfit men to develop the metabolic syndrome, even after adjustment for major confounders. Adjustment for possible mediating factors attenuated the association. Associations of LTPA and VO(2max) with development of the metabolic syndrome, as defined by the NCEP, were qualitatively similar. CONCLUSIONS: In particular, high-risk men engaging in currently recommended levels of physical activity were less likely to develop the metabolic syndrome than sedentary men. Cardiorespiratory fitness was also strongly protective, although possibly not independent of mediating factors.     

Metabolic Syndrome: Comparison of Occurrence Using Three Definitions in Hypertensive Patients

Objective: To compare the frequency of occurrence of metabolic syndrome using three international definitions and to study the distribution of cardiovascular risk factors among newly diagnosed hypertensive Nigerian subjects.Design: Cross sectional study.Settings: Cardiology unit of LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria.Participants: One hundred forty newly diagnosed hypertensive Nigerian subjects, and 70 normotensive controls (age- and sex-matched) were included in this study.Methods: Clinical history and relevant laboratory investigations were performed on all study participants. The definition of metabolic syndrome was based on three international definitions: World Health Organization (WHO), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III). Ethical approval was obtained for the study. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0.Results: There was no difference in age and gender distribution between the hypertensive subjects and controls. (55.14 ± 10.83 years, females 53.6% vs. 54.67 ± 10.89 years, females 52.9% respectively, P>0.05). The frequency of occurrence of metabolic syndrome among hypertensives was 34.5% according to WHO, 35.0% according to NCEP ATP III, and 42.5% according to IDF criteria. Visceral obesity and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were the other common cardiovascular risk factors among newly diagnosed hypertensive subjects. Female hypertensives had a higher prevalence of visceral obesity and low HDL.Conclusion: Frequency of occurrence of metabolic syndrome was similar using the NCEP ATP III and WHO definitions. However, the IDF definition resulted in a higher frequency because of the lower cut-off for waist circumference used for identification of visceral obesity. Metabolic syndrome is present in a significant proportion of newly diagnosed hypertensive subjects. Therefore, appropriate screening and treatment are required.     

Is the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome useful for predicting cardiovascular disease in asian diabetic patients? Analysis from the Japan Diabetes Complications Study

OBJECTIVE: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is believed to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although its prevalence is extremely high among diabetic patients, its prevalence in those with no history of CVD has not been determined. Moreover, prospective studies published on the association between MetS and cardiovascular events in diabetic populations have used only the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of MetS and included only white European subjects. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of MetS, as defined by both the WHO and the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), and its predictive value for CVD in Asian diabetic patients in a long-term, prospective setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The baseline characteristics and incidence/hazard ratio of cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease and stroke) were determined in 1,424 Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with and without MetS, as defined by WHO (WHO-MetS) or the NCEP. RESULTS: A high prevalence (38-53%, depending on sex and definition) of MetS was found among diabetic patients, even those with no history of CVD. During the 8-year study period, only WHO-MetS was a predictor for CVD in female patients. In male patients, although both definitions of MetS were significant predictors for CVD, individual components of MetS, such as hyperlipidemia or hypertension, were equivalent or better predictors. CONCLUSIONS: We found that MetS is relatively common in diabetic patients with no history of CVD. We suggest that the commonly used definitions of MetS, at least in their present forms, have limited clinical usefulness for Asian diabetic patients and may need some ethnic group-specific modifications for global use.     

Reduction of cardiovascular events by simvastatin in nondiabetic coronary heart disease patients with and without the metabolic syndrome: subgroup analyses of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of simvastatin treatment on the risk of cardiovascular events in nondiabetic patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with and without the metabolic syndrome, as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subgroup analyses were performed on data from 3933 nondiabetic patients with clinically established CHD, serum total cholesterol level 5.5-8.0 mmol/l, and serum triglyceride level 相似文献   

A prospective cohort study of predictive value of homocysteine in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists on the role of homocysteine as a predictor of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether elevated plasma homocysteine levels are independently associated with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study that included 507 patients with type 2 diabetes and angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to homocysteine level above or below median value (12.4 micromol/L): the high homocysteine group (255 patients) and the low homocysteine group (252 patients). The primary end-point of the study was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: There were 103 deaths during a 4-year follow-up: 62 deaths in the high homocysteine group and 41 deaths in the low homocysteine group (Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality 25.6% and 17.4%, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.27, P=0.031). Sixty-two of 103 deaths (60.2%) were of cardiovascular origin: 37 deaths (14.5%) occurred in the high homocysteine group and 25 deaths (9.9%) occurred in the low homocysteine group (P=0.115). Cox proportional hazards model showed that plasma homocysteine was not an independent correlate of all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% CI 0.89-1.33; P=0.397 for 5 micromol/L increase in concentration) or cardiovascular (adjusted HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.80-1.36, P=0.753, for 5 micromol/L increase in concentration) mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, elevated level of homocysteine is an associate of increased cardiovascular risk but not an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality.     

The American Diabetes Association and World Health Organization classifications for diabetes: their impact on diabetes prevalence and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in elderly Japanese-American men

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in a sample of elderly Japanese-American men; to examine the association with total and cardiovascular mortality by diabetes status using both classifications; and to determine whether the fasting or 2-h glucose measurement is a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Examinations given from 1991 to 1993 in the Honolulu Heart Program were used as baseline for these analyses. Subjects were 71-93 years of age at that time and were followed for total and cardiovascular disease mortality for up to 7 years. RESULTS: A total of approximately 66% of individuals who had diabetes by WHO criteria were missed when the ADA definition was used. The relative risks of total and cardiovascular mortality for those with versus those without diabetes were similar for both definitions; however, when fasting and postload glucose measures were analyzed as continuous variables, the 2-h measurement was a superior predictor and was independent of fasting glucose. In contrast, fasting glucose was not an independent predictor of these outcomes in the presence of the 2-h measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of glucose metabolism abnormalities was very high among elderly Japanese-American men. The WHO classification was superior to the ADA classification in identification of subjects at high risk for adverse outcomes. Therefore, we conclude that the 2-h glucose measurement is valuable and should be retained in epidemiologic studies.     

Survival in patients with type 2 diabetes in a Swedish community: skaraborg hypertension and diabetes project

OBJECTIVE: To explore risk factors for all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes treated in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:A prospective population-based study of 400 patients with type 2 diabetes who consecutively completed an annual checkup in primary care in Skara, Sweden, during 1992-1993. Vital status was ascertained to year 2000. Baseline characteristics as predictors for mortality were analyzed by Cox regression and expressed as relative risks (RRs), with 95% CIs. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up time of 5.9 years, 131 patients died (56 deaths per 1,000 patients per year). In both sexes, all-cause mortality was predicted by HbA(1c) (by 1%; RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.27), and by LDL-to-HDL cholesterol ratios (1.15, 1.00-1.32). Increased mortality was also seen with prevalent hypertension (1.72, 1.21-2.44), microalbuminuria (1.87, 1.27-2.76), and previous cardiovascular disease (1.70, 1.15-2.50). Subanalyses revealed that increased mortality related to HbA(1c) was restricted to hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (1.23, 1.04-1.47). Serum triglycerides (by 1 mmol/l) predicted all-cause mortality in women (1.25, 1.06-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Poor glucose and lipid control and hypertension predicted all-cause mortality. Survival was also predicted by prevalent microalbuminuria and by previous cardiovascular disease. Confirming results from clinical trials, this population-based study has implications for primary and secondary prevention.