Six month abstinence rule for liver transplantation in severe alcoholic liver disease patients

Alcoholic liver disease(ALD) is the second most common diagnosis among patients undergoing liver transplantation(LT). The recovery results of patients transplanted for ALD are often at least as good as those of patients transplanted for other diagnoses and better than those suffering from hepatitis C virus, cryptogenic cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Inthe case of medically non-responding patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis or acute-on chronic liver failure, the refusal of LT is often based on the lack of the required alcohol abstinence period of six months. The obligatory abidance of a period of abstinence as a transplant eligibility requirement for medically non-responding patients seems unfair and inhumane, since the majority of these patients will not survive the six-month abstinence period. Data from various studies have challenged the 6-mo rule, while excellent survival results of LT have been observed in selected patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis not responding to medical therapy. Patients with severe advanced ALD should have legal access to LT. The mere lack of pre-LT abstinence should not be an obstacle for being listed.     

Abstinence in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis: A follow-up study

Aim:  To investigate the proportion of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis who abstained from alcohol after contact with a hepatology unit, the predictors for abstinence, and the role of clinical and psychosocial factors in short-term mortality in these patients.
Methods:  Eighty-seven consecutive patients with alcoholic cirrhosis from a transplant center were included. Data on cirrhosis severity and complications, as well as on abstinence and psychosocial factors were collected. Patients were followed up for 19 (12–25) months. Data on abstinence during follow up, alcohol abuse treatment, psychiatric contact, severity of cirrhosis, mortality, and liver transplantation were analyzed.
Results:  Prior to inclusion, 53/87 (61%) patients had abstained from alcohol for 24 months (interquartile range: 18–33). Twenty percent had a history of other substance abuse, 47% had undergone alcohol abuse treatment, and 21% had a previous psychiatric diagnosis. Forty-eight percent lived with a partner, 23% worked/studied, and 53% were pensioners. During follow up, 26% died, 20% received a liver transplant, 55% abstained from alcohol, 47% received alcohol abuse treatment, and 33% had psychiatric contact. In a multivariate analysis, abstinence during follow up was found to be related to abstinence upon inclusion in the study, to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at follow up, and to no abuse treatment in a detoxification unit, whereas mortality was related to index MELD and alcohol abuse treatment during follow up. Neither abstinence nor mortality was related to psychosocial factors.
Conclusion:  More than half of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were found to abstain from alcohol during follow up, which was related to prior documentation of abstinence and cirrhosis severity. Cirrhosis severity (expressed as the MELD) and alcohol abuse treatment during follow up were related to short-term mortality.     

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease among Canadian transplant centres: A national study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a controversial yet established indication for liver transplantation (LT), and there is emerging evidence supporting a survival benefit in selected patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis. The aim of the present survey was to describe policies among Canadian transplant centres for patients with ALD.

METHODS:

A survey was distributed to the medical directors of all seven liver transplant centres in Canada.

RESULTS:

All seven liver transplant programs in Canada participated in the survey. Every centre requires patients to have a minimum of six months of abstinence from alcohol before listing for LT. Completion of a rehabilitation program is only mandatory in one program; the remaining programs do not mandate this if patients have demonstrated prolonged abstinence, and sufficient insight and social supports. No program considers LT for patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis, although six of the seven programs are interested in exploring a national policy. Random alcohol checks for waitlisted patients are performed routinely on patients listed for ALD at only one centre; the remaining centres only perform checks if there is clinical suspicion. In the past five years, the mean (± SD) number of patients per centre with graft dysfunction from recidivism was 10±4.36; a mean of 2.5±4.36 patients per centre developed graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS:

With minor exceptions, LT policies for subjects with ALD are uniform across Canadian transplant programs. Presently, no centres perform LT for acute alcoholic hepatitis, although there is broad interest in exploring a national policy. Recidivism resulting in graft loss is a rare phenomenon.     

Outcomes following liver transplantation for patients with alcohol- versus nonalcohol-induced liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: To document and compare the outcomes of adult patients who received liver transplants for alcohol- and nonalcohol-induced liver diseases who attended a liver transplantation follow-up clinic in an urban, nontransplantation centre at a time when no formal alcohol abuse program for transplant candidates and/or recipients was offered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 10 alcoholic patients and 48 nonalcoholic patients followed for an average of 41 months (range five to 79 months) and 46 months (range two to 116 months), respectively. Primary outcome variables included rates of recidivism, duration of abstinence after transplantation and compliance with post-transplant medical follow-up visits. Time to discharge after transplantation, episodes of graft rejection, liver and renal biochemical abnormalities, diabetes, hypertension, sepsis, strictures, complications unrelated to transplantation and changes in psychosocial status were secondary outcome variables. RESULTS: Significant differences were found with respect to a higher incidence of recidivism (50% for alcoholic patients compared with 2% for nonalcoholic patients, P<0.0001), a shorter period of abstinence after transplantation (14.7+/-17.2 months for alcoholic patients compared with 26.3+/-23.0 months for nonalcoholic patients, P<0.05) and more missed office visits (2.7+/-3.5 for alcoholic patients compared with 1.0+/-1.9 for nonalcoholic patients, P=0.05) in the alcoholic group. The alcoholic group also had a lower incidence of rejection episodes (10% for alcoholic patients compared with 44% for nonalcoholic patients, P<0.05) but higher rates of post-transplantation diabetes (40% for alcoholic patients compared with 2% for nonalcoholic patients, P<0.05), more nontransplantation-related complications (20% for alcoholic patients compared with 0% for nonalcoholic patients, P<0.05), and higher serum creatinine but lower bilirubin and cyclosporine A levels (P<0.05, respectively). Marital separations were also more common in the alcoholic group (20% for alcoholic patients compared with 0% for nonalcoholic patients, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of formal alcohol abuse programs, the post-transplantation outcome in alcoholic patients generally does not compare well with that of patients who undergo transplantation for nonalcohol-related liver diseases.     

Acute alcoholic hepatitis,end stage alcoholic liver disease and liver transplantation: An Italian position statement

Alcoholic liver disease encompasses a broad spectrum of diseases ranging from steatosis steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Forty-four per cent of all deaths from cirrhosis are attributed to alcohol. Alcoholic liver disease is the second most common diagnosis among patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). The vast majority of transplant programmes (85%) require 6 mo of abstinence prior to transplantation; commonly referred to as the “6-mo rule”. Both in the case of progressive end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and in the case of severe acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH), not responding to medical therapy, there is a lack of evidence to support a 6-mo sobriety period. It is necessary to identify other risk factors that could be associated with the resumption of alcohol drinking. The “Group of Italian Regions” suggests that: in a case of ESLD with model for end-stage liver disease < 19 a 6-mo abstinence period is required; in a case of ESLD, a 3-mo sober period before LT may be more ideal than a 6-mo period, in selected patients; and in a case of severe AAH, not responding to medical therapies (up to 70% of patients die within 6 mo), LT is mandatory, even without achieving abstinence. The multidisciplinary transplant team must include an addiction specialist/hepato-alcohologist. Patients have to participate in self-help groups.     

Liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease current status and controversies

Alcoholic cirrhosis remains the second most common indication for liver transplantation.A comprehensive medical and psychosocial evaluation is needed when making a decision to place such patients on the transplant list.Most transplant centers worldwide need a minimum of 6 mo of alcohol abstinence for listing these patients.Patients with alcohol dependence are at high risk for relapse to alcohol use after transplantation(recidivism).These patients need to be identified and require alcohol rehabilitation treatment before transplantation.Recidivism to the level of harmful drinking is reported in about 15%-20%cases.Although,recurrent cirrhosis and graft loss from recidivism is rare,occurring in less than 5%of all alcoholic cirrhosis-related transplants,harmful drinking in the post-transplant pe-riod does impact the long-term outcome.The development of metabolic syndrome with cardiovascular events and de novo malignancy are important contributors to non liver-related mortality amongst transplants for alcoholic liver disease.Surveillance protocols for earlier detection of de novo malignancy are needed to improve the long-term outcome.The need for a minimum of 6 mo of abstinence before listing makes transplant a nonviable option for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who do not respond to corticosteroids.Emerging data from retrospective and prospective studies has challenged the 6 mo rule,and beneficial effects of liver transplantation have been reported in select patients with a first episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis who are unresponsive to steroids.     

Liver transplantation and alcoholic liver disease: History,controversies, and considerations

Alcohol consumption accounts for 3.8% of annual global mortality worldwide, and the majority of these deaths are due to alcoholic liver disease(ALD), mainly alcoholic cirrhosis. ALD is one of the most common indications for liver transplantation(LT). However, it remains a complicated topic on both medical and ethical grounds, as it is seen by many as a "self-inflicted disease". One of the strongest ethical arguments against LT for ALD is the probability of relapse. However, ALD remains a common indication for LT worldwide. For a patient to be placed on an LT waiting list, 6 mo of abstinence must have been achieved for most LT centers. However, this "6-mo rule" is an arbitrary threshold and has never been shown to affect survival, sobriety, or other outcomes. Recent studies have shown similar survival rates among individuals who undergo LT for ALD and those who undergo LT for other chronic causes of end-stage liver disease. There are specific factors that should be addressed when evaluating LT patients with ALD because these patients commonly have a high prevalence of multisystem alcohol-related changes. Risk factors for relapse include the presence of anxiety or depressive disorders, short pre-LT duration of sobriety, and lack of social support. Identification of risk factors and strengthening of the social support system may decrease relapse among these patients. Family counseling for LT candidates is highly encouraged to prevent alcohol consumption relapse. Relapse has been associated with unique histopathological changes, graft damage, graft loss, and even decreased survival in some studies. Research has demonstrated the importance of a multidisciplinary evaluation of LT candidates. Complete abstinence should be attempted to overcome addiction issues and to allow spontaneous liver recovery. Abstinence is the cornerstone of ALD therapy. Psychotherapies, including 12-step facilitation therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and motivational enhancement therapy, help support abstinence. Nutritional therapy helps to reverse muscle wasting, weight loss, vitamin deficiencies, and trace element deficiencies associated with ALD. For muscular recovery, supervised physical activity has been shown to lead to a gain in muscle mass and improvement of functional activity. Early LT for acute alcoholic hepatitis has been the subject of recent clinical studies, with encouraging results in highly selected patients. The survival rates after LT for ALD are comparable to those of patients who underwent LT for other indications. Patients that undergo LT for ALD and survive over 5 years have a higher risk of cardiorespiratory disease, cerebrovascular events, and de novo malignancy.     

Predictive factors of abstinence in patients undergoing liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Introduction. Alcoholic cirrhosis is one of the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT) in western countries. A major concern about transplant patients due to alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is alcoholic recidivism. Data concerning psycho-social characteristics of patients with 6 months of abstinence at initial evaluation for LT is scarce.Objectives. The aims of this study were 1) To evaluate the psycho-social profile of a cohort of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis being evaluated for LT. 2) Determine factors associated with abstinence from alcohol at initial psycho-social evaluation for LT and 3) To evaluate the potential impact of alcohol-free beer consumption on 6-month abstinence.Material and methods. Ninety patients referred to the Alcohol Unit of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (January 1995-December 1996) were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with cessation in alcohol consumption and with 6-month abstinence.Results. Factors associated with cessation in alcohol consumption were awareness of alcohol toxicity (OR = 5.84, CI 1.31-26.11, p = 0.02) and family recognition (OR = 3.81, CI 1.27-11.41, p = 0.01). Cessation of alcohol consumption at knowledge of ALD (OR = 5.50, CI 1.52-19.81, p = 0.009), awareness of alcohol toxicity (OR = 2.99, CI 1.029.22, p = 0.05) and family recognition (OR = 5.21, CI 1.12-24.15, p = 0.03) were the independent factors associated with 6-month abstinence previous to psycho-social evaluation for LT.Conclusion. In conclusion awareness of alcohol toxicity and family recognition are the independent factors that influence cessation in alcohol consumption and 6-month abstinence in patients evaluated for LT. The use of alcohol-free beer was associated with a higher rate of abstinence in patients without alcohol cessation.     

A Model to Examine the Validity of the 6-Month Abstinence Criterion for Liver Transplantation

Six months of abstinence from alcohol is a commonly used criterion for liver transplantation eligibility for patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. There is limited evidence to document the validity of this criterion with regard to risk of alcoholism relapse. Ninety-one patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were interviewed for relapse risk using the High Risk Alcoholism Relapse (HRAR) Scale. The HRAR model can be used to predict relapse risk independent of duration of sobriety and therefore can be used to examine the validity of the 6 months of abstinence criteria in this clinical population. The two methods demonstrated poor to fair agreement. Agreement was highest with a cutoff allowing a 5% 6-month relapse risk when 79% agreement ( k = 0.56) was demonstrated between the two methods. Using the 6-month abstinence criterion alone disallows a significant number of candidates who have a low relapse risk based on their HRAR score. The validity of the 6-month abstinence criterion is supported somewhat by comparison with the HRAR model. However, use of the 6-month abstinence criterion alone forces a significant number of patients with a low relapse risk by HRAR to wait for transplant listing. A relapse risk model based on an estimate of alcoholism severity in addition to duration of sobriety may more accurately select patients who are most likely to benefit from liver transplantation.     

The Reluctance of Liver Transplant Participants with Alcoholic Liver Disease to Participate in Treatment for Their Alcohol Use Disorder: An Issue of Treatment Matching?

Liver transplantation (LT) has increased the survival for participants with end-stage alcoholic liver disease (ALD), however more than 50% of ALD transplant patients return to alcohol use after LT. Despite medical referral and a number of clinical trials of standard alcohol interventions, participants who are ALD transplant patients are reluctant to use specialist alcohol programs to support their required abstinence. The aim of this study was to identify those factors contributing to treatment reluctance by participants who are ALD transplant patients. The authors conducted a prospective case-control study comparing 40 ALD transplant patients matched for age and sex with 40 alcohol treatment seekers on a number of demographic and clinical predictors associated with treatment seeking. The authors found that lengthy abstinence and a progressive stage of change profile by participants who are ALD transplant patients contributed toward alcohol treatment being perceived as unwarranted or not needed. Furthermore, the ALD group differed significantly to those who would typically utilize alcohol treatment on a number of other clinical variables suggesting that standard alcohol interventions are not well tailored to the ALD transplant population. Two major barriers to help seeking among ALD transplant patients included the potential for stigma and limited access to alcohol services. Based on these findings, an individualized stepped-care alcohol treatment approach taking into account the clinical characteristics and needs of ALD transplant participants is required. Alcohol treatment needs to be integrated with the medical transplant program and is recommended for responsiveness to the ongoing psychological and social needs of those at risk of relapsing.     

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Alcoholism is a disease of remission and relapse. A lapse in abstinence tends to be viewed as a failure to commit to abstinence, and an acknowledged relapse may lead to the patient's removal from the liver transplant list; however, such a relapse may actually offer insight into alcoholism. Liver transplant physicians should consider recognizing lapses in abstinence as slips that indicate a need for treatment of alcoholism. Further research should address which alcoholic liver patients suffer relapses and how alcohol relapse affects the ability to maintain abstinence before or after transplantation.     

The evolution of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (past, present, and future)

Over the past quarter-century, liver transplantation (LT) has been established as a durable therapy for all forms of end-stage liver disease. LT appears ideally suited for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as it involves complete oncologic resection and correction of the underlying liver dysfunction. Since LT based on the Milan criteria has been shown to provide good diseasefree survival, LT is considered the optimal treatment for small HCC, especially in patients with underlying chronic liver disease. However, because there is a severe shortage of organ donors, not all patients in need can be offered LT. Transplant listing criteria must simultaneously determine the greatest number of suitable candidates for LT while rejecting the smallest number of those who could benefit from LT. The amended model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy has had a positive effect on liver transplant candidates with HCC, and their number has been increasing significantly over the past several years. To minimize dropout from the waiting list, the treatment of HCC with procedures such as chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, or ethanol injection in patients awaiting LT have become widespread. It is currently accepted that liver resection is the best option for the treatment of small HCC when liver function is well preserved, and that LT is preferred when liver function is severely impaired (Child-Pugh class B or C). However, the question arises as to what is the best option for Child-Pugh class A patients with early HCC eligible for both resection and LT, especially in Western countries. HCC is a major indication for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), because the risk of dropout while waiting is negligible. Extension of the Milan criteria in the setting of LDLT may offer more patients a potentially curative treatment without reducing the donor pool of organs for patients on the waiting list with nonmalignant liver disease. However, imprudent expansion of the selection criteria may result in more patients with HCC being cured at the expense of a higher incidence of recurrence.     

Addiction specialist's role in liver transplantation procedures for alcoholic liver disease

Although liver transplantation(LT) is performed increasingly for patients with end-stage alcoholic liver disease(ALD), the topic remains controversial. Traditionally, the role of an addiction specialist focused on the screening and identification of patients with a high risk on relapse in heavy alcohol use. These patients were in many cases subsequently excluded from a further LT procedure.Recently, awareness is growing that not only screening of patients but also offering treatment, helping patients regain and maintain abstinence is essential, opening up a broader role for the addiction specialist(team)within the whole of the transplant procedure. Within this context, high-risk assessment is proposed to be an indication of increasing addiction treatment intensity,instead of being an exclusion criterion. In this review we present an overview regarding the state of the art on alcohol relapse assessment and treatment in patients with alcohol use disorders, both with and without ALD.Screening, treatment and monitoring is suggested as central roles for the addiction specialist(team) integrated within transplant centers.     

Liver transplantation alcohol related liver disease: (deliberately) stirring a hornet's nest!

Outcomes after liver transplantation for alcohol related liver disease compare very favourably with those documented for other causes of cirrhosis. Despite this, 5% or less of patients with advanced alcohol related liver disease are considered for transplantation. The reasons for this are complex but include professional reluctance to refer these patients for formal assessment as well as a limited and dwindling number of organs available for transplantation. Demonstrating abstinence from alcohol consumption remains central to the assessment of candidates for transplantation. Return to alcohol consumption after transplantation can follow a pattern of abuse with consequences for health and survival but may also be controlled and of little clinical significance. A better understanding of the issues influencing these outcomes should decrease the tension that currently exists between patient expectations, professional opinion, and the attitude of the general public who gift organs for donation.     

Pre operative cardio pulmonary assessment of the liver transplant candidate

Given the severe shortage of liver donors, a carefully evaluation and selection of patients who are likely to obtain a significant survival benefit from liver transplantation (LT) is imperative in order to attain successful outcomes. Cardiovascular and respiratory events remain one of the leading causes of non-graft-related death in LT. A variety of pre-existing cardiac and pulmonary disorders are commonly identified in LT recipients, more so than in the general population. Uncertainties regarding the optimal assessment of cardiovascular and respiratory function in potential transplant candidates have produced a wide variation in the clinical care of tjis population. There is still no consensus on which assessment algorithm confers the best outcomes. Once the diagnosis has been established, the prognosis should be estimated for risk stratification and to confirm the candidacy for LT. Additionally, the challenge remains in knowing how cardiac or respiratory derangements in candidates affect the long-term outcome after LT and which is the magnitude of risk that we as physicians are willing to accept. This article discusses the cardiac and pulmonary aspects of liver disease that may impact recipient selection. Relevant literature focused upon the most common entities in this field is presented in this review.
     

Controversies in Early Liver Transplantation for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis

Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a condition of acute liver inflammation in the setting of heavy alcohol use that is often managed with corticosteroids in severe cases. Among non-responders to steroids, however, prognosis is poor with up to 75% mortality within 6 months after treatment failure. Early liver transplantation (LT) can achieve an acceptable short-term survival, and initial studies have demonstrated 3-year survival rates of up to 84%. However, the practice of early LT in severe AH remains controversial with concerns over the 6-month rule of sobriety and risk of alcohol relapse post-transplant. Proponents of LT advocate for better understanding of alcohol use as a disorder rather than self-inflicted cause of illness, aim to redefine the misguided application of the 6-month rule, and point out similar relapse rates among patients with early LT and those with greater than 6 months abstinence before transplant. Opponents of LT emphasize the correlation between alcohol relapse and graft failure and mortality, public resistance and potential for distrust among donors, and arguments that transplant centers need to establish improved models to predict relapse and standardize candidate selection criteria across centers. Here we review recent literature on this controversy and provide recommendations for moving forward to consensus.     

When a liver transplant recipient goes back to alcohol abuse: Should we be more selective?

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is one of the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT). However, it has always remained as a complicated topic from both medical and ethical grounds, as it is seen for many a “self-inflicted disease”. Over the years, the survival rate of transplanted patients has significantly improved. The allocation system and the inclusion criteria for LT has also undergone some modifications. Early LT for acute alcoholic hepatitis has been subject to recent clinical studies with encouraging results in highly selected patients. We have learned from studies the importance of a multidisciplinary evaluation of candidates for LT. Complete abstinence should be attempted to overcome addiction issues and to allow spontaneous liver recovery. Risk factors for relapse include the presence of anxiety or depressive disorder, short duration of sobriety pre-LT and lack of social support. The identification of risk factors and the strengthen of social support system may decrease relapse among these patients. Family counseling of candidates is highly encouraged to prevent relapse to alcohol. Relapse has been associated with different histopathological changes, graft damage, graft loss and even decrease in survival among some studies. Therefore, each patient should be carefully selected and priority is to continue to lean on patients with high probability of success. The ethical issue remains as to the patient returning to drinking after the LT, hindering the way for other patients who could have received the same organ.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) plays an important role in patients with liver cirrhosis on the wait list for liver transplantation (LT). The 1 and 5-year probability of developing HRS in cirrhotic with ascites is 20% and 40%, respectively. In this article, we reviewed current concepts in HRS pathophysiology, guidelines for HRS diagnosis, effective treatment options presently available, and controversies surrounding liver alone vs simultaneous liver kidney transplant (SLKT) in transplant candidates. Many treatment options including albumin, vasoconstrictors, renal replacement therapy, and eventual LT have remained a mainstay in the treatment of HRS. Unfortunately, even after aggressive measures such as terlipressin use, the rate of recovery is less than 50% of patients. Moreover, current SLKT guidelines include: (1) estimation of glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min or less for 4-8 wk; (2) proteinuria > 2 g/d; or (3) biopsy proven interstitial fibrosis or glomerulosclerosis. Even with these updated criteria there is a lack of consistency regarding long-term benefits for SLKT vs LT alone. Finally, in regards to kidney dysfunction in the post-transplant setting, an estimation of glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m² may be associated with an increased risk of patients having long-term end stage renal disease. HRS is common in patients with cirrhosis and those on liver transplant waitlist. Prompt identification and therapy initiation in transplant candidates with HRS may improve post-transplantation outcomes. Future studies identifying optimal vasoconstrictor regimens, alternative therapies, and factors predictive of response to therapy are needed. The appropriate use of SLKT in patients with HRS remains controversial and requires further evidence by the transplant community.     

Outcome of liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is accepted as effective therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease, including alcoholic liver disease AIM: To evaluate the outcome of liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease in the Liver Transplantation Program at "Hospital de Clínicas" of the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was performed a retrospective study of the patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcoholic end-stage liver disease between September 1991 and January 2001. The minimum abstinence period required was 6 months before liver transplantation. Identification of alcohol consumption after liver transplantation was determinated by information provided by patient or family and biochemical or histological anormalities. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease in the study period, 95% (19/20) were men and the median age was 50 years (29-61 years). Seventy-five percent of the patients (15/20) had severe liver disfunction (Child C class) in the pre-transplant period. In six of them (30%) there was association with viral hepatitis and in one, with hepatocarcinoma. Median abstinence period before liver transplantation was 24 months, varying from 9 to 120 months. One-year and 3-year survival rate were 75% and 50%, respectively. The main complications were: acute cellular rejection (40%), chronic rejection (5%), hepatic artery thrombosis (15%), biliary complications (15%), bacterial or fungal infections (45%), cytomegalovirus infection (20%). Three patients returned to alcohol use after liver transplantation CONCLUSION: The survival of patients who received liver transplant for alcoholic cirrhosis are satisfactory. In the present study there was a small index of alcohol use after liver transplantation.     

Selection for and outcome of liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease.

It has been proposed that evaluation of alcoholic patients for liver transplantation should comprise a multidisciplinary program including medical, surgical, and psychiatric assessment. This article presents the outcome in 99 alcoholic persons evaluated from 1985 through 1989. Alcoholism was defined as alcohol dependence or abuse according to the DSM-III-R. Forty-five patients (43%) were considered suitable candidates and underwent transplantation. Actuarial survival in this group was 78% and 73% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and did not differ from that observed in nonalcoholic recipients. Return to alcohol use after transplantation has been documented in 5 persons, 2 of whom have had episodes of uncontrolled drinking. Of 54 patients not selected for transplantation, 17 were considered too well and suitable for alternative therapy. Actuarial survival was 93% at 12 and 18 months but declined to 59% at 24 months. Nineteen patients were medically unsuitable and had very poor survival; survival was 35% at 3 months and 0% at 12 months. Seventeen patients were not selected on psychiatric grounds. Actuarial survival in this group (65% at 12 months, 43% at 18 months) was significantly less than that in alcoholics with transplants (P less than 0.05). There were no differences in age, sex ratio, degree of hepatic dysfunction, or duration of abstinence between alcoholics with transplants and those considered psychiatrically unsuitable. It was concluded that liver transplantation is successful in selected patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, that patients who are not selected because they are "too well" need continuing surveillance as a significant decline in survival can occur 18-24 months after initial evaluation and, finally, that patients not selected on psychiatric grounds have a significantly worse survival rate than those with transplants.