Triple, standard quadruple and ampicillin-sulbactam-based quadruple therapies for H pylori eradication： A comparative three-armed randomized clinical trial

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of triple, standard quadruple and ampicillin-sulbactam-based quadruple therapies for H pylori eradication in a comparative threearmed randomized clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 360 H pylori-positive patients suffering from dyspepsia and aging 24-79 years with a median age of 42 years were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated into the following three groups: group A (n = 120) received a standard 1-wk triple therapy (20 mg omeprazole b.i.d., 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d.); group B (n = 120) received a 10-d standard quadruple therapy (20 mg omeprazole b.i.d., 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., 240 mg colloidal bismuth subcitrate b.i.d., and 500 mg metronidazole b.i.d.); group C (n = 120) received the new protocol, i.e. 375 mg sultamicillin (225 mg ampicillin plus 150 mg sulbactam) b.i.d. (before breakfast and dinner), instead of amoxicillin in the standard quadruple therapy for the same duration. Chi-square test with the consideration of P < 0.05 as significant was used to compare the eradication rates by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses in the three groups. RESULTS: The per-protocol eradication rate was 91.81% (101 patients from a total of 110) in group A, 85.84% (97 patients from a total of 113) in group B, and 92.85% (104 patients from a total of 112) in group C. The intentionto-treat eradication rate was 84.17% in group A, 80.83% in group B, and 86.67% in group C. The new protocol yielded the highest eradication rates by both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses followed by the standard triple and quadruple regimens, respectively. However, the differences were not statistically significant between the three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide further support for the equivalence of triple and quadruple therapies in terms of effectiveness, compliance and side-effect profile when administered as first-line treatment for H pylori infection. Moreover, the new protocol using ampicillin-sulbactam instead of amoxicillin in the quadruple regimen is a suitable first-line alternative to be used in regions with amoxicillin-resistant H pylori strains.     

Quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

AIM:To investigate quadruple therapy with rabeprazole,amoxicillin,levofloxacin and furazolidone for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection.METHODS:A total of 147 patients were divided into the experimental treatment group (n=78) and the standard triple treatment group (n=69).The experimental treatment group received rabeprazole 20 mg,amoxicillin 1.0 g,levofloxacin 0.2 g and furazolidone 0.1 g,twice daily.The standard triple treatment group received omeprazole 20 mg,amoxicillin 1.0 g and clarithromycin 0.5 g,twice daily.RESULTS:One month after treatment,the 13 C urea breath test was carried out to detect H.pylori.The eradication rate using per-protocol analysis was 94.3% in the experimental treatment group and 73% in the standard triple treatment group (P < 0.05),and using intention to test analysis,these figures were 86% and 67% in the two groups,respectively.Side effects were observed in 34 patients,and included mild dizziness,nausea,diarrhea and increased bowel movement.Eleven of the 34 patients needed no treatment for their side effects.CONCLUSION:Rabeprazole,amoxicillin,levofloxacinand furazolidone quadruple therapy is a safe method for the eradication of H.pylori with high efficacy and good tolerability.     

Maastricht Ⅱ treatment scheme and efficacy of different proton pump inhibitors in eradicating Helicobacter pylori

AIM: The Maastricht Ⅱ criteria suggest the use of amoxicillin and clarithromycin in addition to a proton pump inhibitor over 7-10 d as a first line therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hpylori). For each proton pump inhibitor, various rates of eradication have been reported. The present study was to compare the efficacy of different proton pump inhibitors like omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in combination with amoxicillin and clarithromycin in the first line eradication of Hpylonand to investigate the success of H pylonrieradication in our district. METHODS: A total of 139 patients were included having a Helicobacter pylori (+) gastroduodenal disorders diagnosed by means of histology and urease test. Besides amoxicillin (1000 mg twice a day) and darithromycin (500 mg twice a day), they were randomized to take omeprazole (20 mg twice a day), or lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day), or pantoprozole (40 mg twice a day) for 14 d. Four weeks after the therapy, the eradication was assessed by means of histology and urease test. It was evaluated as eradicated if the Hpyloriwas found negative in both. The complaints (pain in epigastrium, nocturnal pain, pyrosis and bloating) were graded in accordance with the Licert scale. The compliance of the patients was recorded. RESULTS: The eradication was found to be 40.8% in the omeprazole group, 43.5% in the lansoprazole group and 47.4% in the pantoprazole group. Sixty-three out of 139 patients (45%) had eradication. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Significant improvements were seen in terms of the impact on the symptom scores in each group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in H pylori eradication, and the rate of eradication was as low as 45%. Symptoms were improved independent of the eradication in each treatment group. The low eradication rates suggest that the antibiotic resistance or the genetic differences of the microorganism might be in effect. Further studies are required to verify these suggestions.     

Efficacy of one-day quadruple therapy for H pylori infection in Chinese patients

AIM: To compare the efficacies of one-day quadruple therapy and seven-day triple therapy in Chinese patients. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and confirmed H pylori infection were randomized to receive either omeprazole 40 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, and furazolidone 100 mg, all twice a day for 7 d or omeprazole 20 mg (at breakfast and dinner), amoxicillin 1 g, furazolidone 200 mg, and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 220 mg four times for only one day. H pylori status was determined before and at least 5 weeks after therapy by endoscopy with antral and corpus biopsies for rapid urease test and histology. RESULTS: H pylori eradication was successful in 66.67% (20/30) patients in the 7-d group and in 36.67% (11/30) patients in the 1-day group (P - 0.037). Side effects were induced by the treatment in 13.3% (4/30) patients of each group, but these were all self-limiting, short-lasting, and did not require any specific treatment. CONCLUSION: The one-day quadruple therapy is less effective than the one-week regimen in curing H pylori infection in Chinese patients.     

Maastricht Ⅱ treatment scheme and efficacy of different proton pump inhibitors in eradicating Helicobacter pylori

AIM:The Maastricht Ⅱ criteria suggest the use of amoxicillinand darithromycin in addition to a proton pump inhibitor over7-10 d as a first line therapy in the eradication of Helicobacterpylori(Hpylori).For each proton pump inhibitor,various ratesof eradication have been reported.The present study was tocompare the efficacy of different proton pump inhibitors likeomeprazole,lansoprazole and pantoprazole in combinationwith amoxicillin and clarithromycin in the first line eradicationof Hpy/onand to investigate the success of Hpyloneradicationin our district.METHODS:A total of 139 patients were included having aHeelicobacter pylori( ) gastroduodenal disorders diagnosedby means of histology and urease test.Besides amoxicillin(1000mg twice a day) and clarithromycin (500mg twicea day),they were randomized to take omeprazole (20mgtwice a day),or lansoprazole (30mg twice a day),orpantoprozole (40mg twice a day) for 14 d,Four weeksafter the therapy,the eradication was assessed by meansof histology and urease test.It was evaluated as eradicatedif the H pylori was found negative in both.The complaints(pain in epigastrium,nocturnal pain,pyrosis and bloating)were graded in accordance with the Licert scale.Thecompliance of the patients was recorded.RESULTS:The eradication was found to be 40.8% in theomeprazole group,43.5% in the lansoprazole group and47.4% in the pantoprazole group.Sixty-three out of 139patients (45%) had eradication.No statistically significantdifference was observed between the groups.Significantimprovements were seen in terms of the impact on thesymptom scores in each group.CONCLUSION:There was no difference betweenomeprazole,lansoprazole and pantoprazole in H pylorieradication,and the rate of eradication was as low as 45%.Symptoms were improved independent of the eradication ineach treatment group.The low eradication rates suggestthat the antibiotic resistance or the genetic differences ofthe microorganism might be in effect.Further studies arerequired to verify these suggestions.     

Second-line rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Where are we now?

At present, the best rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection following failure of firstline eradication remains unclear. The Maastricht Ⅴ/Florence Consensus Report recommends bismuth quadruple therapy, or fluoroquinolone-amoxicillin triple/quadruple therapy as the second-line therapy for H. pylori infection. Meta-analyses have shown that bismuth quadruple therapy and levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy have comparable eradication rates, while the former has more adverse effects than the latter. There are no significant differences between the eradication rates of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple and quadruple therapies. However, the eradication rates of both levofloxacin-containing treatments are suboptimal. An important caveat of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple or quadruple therapy is poor eradication efficacy in the presence of fluoroquinolone resistance. High-dose dual therapy is an emerging second-line therapy and has an eradication efficacy comparable with levofloxacinamoxicillin triple therapy. Recently, a 10-d tetracyclinelevofloxacin(TL) quadruple therapy comprised of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline and levofloxacin has been developed, which achieves a markedly higher eradication rate compared with levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy(98% vs 69%) in patients with failure of standard triple, bismuth quadruple or non-bismuth quadruple therapy. The present article reviews current second-line anti-H. pylori regimens and treatment algorisms. In conclusion, bismuth quadruple therapy, levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple/quadruple therapy, high-dose dual therapy and TL quadruple therapy can be used as second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. Current evidence suggests that 10-d TL quadruple therapy is a simple and effective regimen, and has the potential to become a universal rescue treatment following eradication failure by all firstline eradication regimens for H. pylori infection.     

Non-bismuth quadruple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized study in Japan

AIM:To find the way to improve the eradication rate of first-line therapy in Japanese patients.METHODS:We prospectively compared the effectiveness of 7-d quadruple therapy to standard 7 d triple therapy in Japanese patients infected with Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori).One hundred and nineteen patients were randomly assigned to receive 7-d non-bismuth quadruple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin,clarithromycin and metronidazole(LACM7) or 7-d triple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin(LAC7).After three months,H.pylori status was analyzed by 13C-urea breath test.Incidence rates of adverse events were evaluated by use of questionnaires.RESULTS:By intention-to-treat(ITT) analysis,the eradication rate in the LACM7 group was 94.9%,which was significantly higher than the LAC7 group(68.3%,P < 0.001).Per protocol analysis also showed a significantly higher eradication rate in the LACM7 group(98.3%) than the LAC7 group(73.2%,P < 0.001).Nevertheless,the incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups(RR:1.10,95% CI:0.70-1.73,P = 0.67).CONCLUSION:Seven day non-bismuth quadruple therapy(LACM7) was superior to standard 7-d triple therapy(LAC7) for first-line eradication.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in surgical practice： A randomised trial of triple versus quadruple therapy in a rural district general hospital

AIM： To compare a lansoprazole-based triple versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori （H pylori） eradication with emphasis on side effect profile, patient compliance and eradication rate at a rural district general hospital in Wales, United Kingdom. METHODS： One hundred one patients with H pylori infection were included in the study. Patients were randomised to receive triple therapy comprising of lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, all b.d. （LAC）, or quadruple therapy comprising of lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.d., and tetracycline chloride 500 mg q.d.s. （LMBT）. Cure was defined as a negative 13C urea breath test 2 mo after treatment. RESULTS： Seven patients were withdrawn after randomisation. Fifty patients were assigned to LAC group and 44 to LMBT group. The intention-to-treat cure rates were 92% and 91%, whereas the perprotocol cure rates were 92% and 97%, respectively. Side effects were common, with 56% experiencingmoderate to severe symptoms in the LAC group and 59% in the LMBT group. Symptoms of vomiting, diarrhoea and black stools were significantly more common in the LMBT group. Patient compliance was 100% for triple therapy and 86% for quadruple therapy （P 〈 0.01）. One-third of patients in both groups were still taking acid-reducing medications at six-month follow-up. CONCLUSION： One-week triple and quadruple therapies have similar intention-to-treat eradication rates. Certain side effects are more common with quadruple therapy, which can compromise patient compliance. Patient education or modifications to the regimen are alternative options to improve compliance of the quadruple regimen.     

Adjuvant probiotics improve the eradication effect of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM:To investigate whether the addition of probiotics can improve the eradication effect of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) infection. METHODS:This open randomized trial recruited 234 H. pylori positive gastritis patients from seven local centers. The patients were randomized to one-week standard triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid , clarithromycin 500 mg bid , and amoxicillin 1000 mg bid ; OCA group, n = 79); two weeks of pre-treatment with probiotics, containing 3 × 107 Lactobacillus acidophilus per day, prior to one week of triple therapy (POCA group, n = 78); or one week of triple therapy followed by two weeks of the same probiotics (OCAP group, n = 77). Successful eradication was defined as a negative C13 or C14 urease breath test four weeks after triple therapy. Patients were asked to report associated symptoms at baseline and during follow-up, and side effects related to therapy were recorded. Data were analyzed by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) methods. RESULTS:PP analysis involved 228 patients, 78 in the OCA, 76 in the POCA and 74 in the OCAP group. Successful eradication was observed in 171 patients; by PP analysis, the eradication rates were significantly higher (P = 0.007 each) in the POCA (62/76; 81.6%, 95% CI 72.8%-90.4%) and OCAP (61/74; 82.4%, 95% CI 73.6%-91.2%) groups than in the OCA group (48/78; 61.5%, 95% CI 50.6%-72.4%). ITT analysis also showed that eradication rates were significantly higher in the POCA (62/78; 79.5%, 95% CI 70.4%-88.6%) and OCAP (61/77; 79.2%, 95% CI 70%-88.4%) groups than in the OCA group (48/79; 60.8%, 95% CI 49.9%-71.7%), (P = 0.014 and P = 0.015). The symptom relieving rates in the POCA, OCAP and OCA groups were 85.5%, 89.2% and 87.2%, respectively. Only one of the 228 patients experienced an adverse reaction. CONCLUSION:Administration of probiotics before or after standard triple therapy may improve H. pylori eradication rates.     

Sofalcone, a mucoprotective agent, increases the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori infection when combined with rabeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin

AIM: The mucoprotective agents, sofalcone and polaprezinc have anti-Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) activities. We determined the therapeutic effects of sofalcone and polaprezinc when combined with rabeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five consecutive outpatients with peptic ulcer and H pylori infection were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups and medicated for 7 d. Group A: triple therapy with rabeprazole (10 mg twice daily), clarithromycin (200 mg twice daily) and amoxicillin (750 mg twice daily). Group B: sofalcone (100 mg thrice daily) plus the triple therapy. Group C: polaprezinc (150 mg twice daily) plus the triple therapy. Eradication was considered successful if 13C-urea breath test was negative at least 4 wk after cessation of eradication regimens or successive famotidine in the cases of active peptic ulcer. RESULTS: On intention-to-treat basis, H pylori cure was achieved in 43 of 55 (78.2%) patients, 47 of 54 (87.0%) and 45 of 56 (80.4%) for the groups A, B and C respectively. Using per protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 81.1% (43/53), 94.0% (47/50) and 84.9% (45/53) respectively. There was a significant difference in the cure rates between group A and B. Adverse events occurred in 10, 12 and 11 patients, from groups A, B and C respectively, but the events were generally mild. CONCLUSION: The addition of sofalcone, but not polaprezinc, significantly increased the cure rate of H pylori infection when combined with the rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen.     

Efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy as second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bismuth-based quadruple therapy for second-line eradication treatment achieves the eradication rate ranging from 70% to 81% due to antimicrobial resistance and poor compliance. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rate of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of bismuth-based quadruple therapy in second-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy. METHODS: Seventy-six outpatients with persistent H. pylori infection after first-line triple therapy were enrolled in this prospective randomized trial. The subjects were randomized to receive levofloxacin 300 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and pantoprazole 20 mg, given twice daily for 7 days (LAP group), or metronidazole 500 mg twice, tetracycline 500 mg four times, and pantoprazole 20 mg twice, bismuth subcitrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (MTPB group). Eradication was confirmed with (13)C-urea breath test or rapid urease test 4 weeks after the cessation of therapy. RESULTS: Among Seventy-six patients initially included, eleven were lost during follow-up. The eradication rates, expressed as intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses, were 51.6% and 53.3% in the LAP group, and 48.9% and 62.9% in the MTPB group, respectively. There was no significant difference in H. pylori eradication rates between the two groups (p=0.815 by ITT, p=0.437 by PP). LAP regimen was better tolerated than MTPB regimen with lower incidence of side effects (10.0% versus 31.4%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication rates of levofloxacin-based triple therapy and bismuth-based quadruple therapy were not significantly different in second-line H. pylori eradication therapy, and low incidence of side effects was observed in levofloxacin-based triple therapy.     

以泮托拉唑为基础的三联和四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效比较——一项单中心、随机、开放、平行对照研究

背景：近年质子泵抑制剂（PPI）＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素标准三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori）的根除率有所降低,PPI＋铋剂＋甲硝唑＋四环素的四联疗法能否成为一线治疗的首选以及适当延长疗程能否提高根除率尚有待明确。目的：比较以泮托拉唑为基础的7d标准三联疗法与7d、10d四联疗法根除H.pylori的疗效。方法：133例非溃疡性消化不良的H.pylori感染患者随机分配至7d三联组（45例,泮托拉唑40mgbid＋阿莫西林1.0gbid＋克拉霉素500mgbid,PAC方案）以及7d、10d四联组（43例和45例,泮托拉唑40mgbid＋枸橼酸铋钾220mgbid＋甲硝唑400mgtid＋四环素750mgbid,PBMT方案）。治疗结束后至少间隔4周行13C-尿素呼气试验复查H.pylori,评估治疗结果。结果：共129例患者按方案完成治疗。三组H.pylori根除率按意图治疗（ITT）分析分别为73.3%、79.1%和88.9%,按方案（PP）分析分别为75.0%、82.9%和90.9%。7dPAC方案的PP根除率显著低于10dPBMT方案（P〈0.05）。除四联组中有2例患者分别因头晕和腹泻而未完成治疗外,其余患者的不良反应相似且均能耐受。结论：在7d标准三联疗法H.pylori根除疗效降低的情况下,含泮托拉唑、铋剂、甲硝唑和四环素的10d四联疗法可考虑作为根除治疗的首选方案。     

One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate versus colloidal bismuth subcitrate-based anti-Helicobacter triple therapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of 1 wk bismuth triple therapy is adversely influenced by the presence of metronidazole resistance. In vitro studies suggest that ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus metronidazole exhibit synergistic activity against metronidazole resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Whether this confers a superior clinical efficacy remains unproven. This study compared the efficacy of RBC-based triple therapy with bismuth triple therapy in eradication of H. pylori. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori-related ulcer disease or gastritis were randomized to receive either 400/mg of RBC twice daily plus 400/mg of metronidazole and 500/mg of tetracycline four times daily for 1 wk (RMT) or 120/mg of colloidal bismuth subcitrate, 400/mg of metronidazole, and 500/mg of tetracycline, all given four times daily for 1 wk (BMT). Metronidazole susceptibility was determined by the E-test and pretreatment resistance was defined as minimum inhibitory concentration > or = 32/mg/L. RESULTS: Of 100 consecutive patients randomized, two patients were lost to follow-up in each group. Forty-three of 85 (51%) H. pylori isolates were metronidazole resistant. Per-protocol cure rate for RMT and BMT was 40 of 41 (98%) and 37 of 44 (84%), respectively (p = 0.058). Intent-to-treat cure rate for RMT and BMT was 46 of 50 and 41 of 50, respectively (92% vs 82%, p = 0.23). A significantly higher eradication of metronidazole resistant H. pylori was observed in the RMT group (25 of 25, 100%) than in the BMT group (12 of 16, 75%), (p = 0.018). Side effects observed in the two treatment groups were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: One week of RBC triple therapy with metronidazole and tetracycline is an effective anti-Helicobacter therapy. This regimen is more appropriate in areas of high prevalence of metronidazole resistance.     

A randomized comparison of quadruple and triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication: The QUADRATE Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Direct comparisons of bismuth and proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple and quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication are lacking. To address this, a randomized study was conducted. METHODS: Infected dyspeptic patients received pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all twice daily, for 7 days (PAC7); or pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, bismuth subcitrate 108 mg, and tetracycline 500 mg, both 4 times daily, and metronidazole 200 mg 3 times daily and 400 mg at night for 7 days (PBTM7); bismuth subcitrate 108 mg and tetracycline 500 mg, both 4 times daily, and metronidazole 200 mg 3 times daily and 400 mg at night for 14 days (BTM14). Outcome was assessed with (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Eradication rates (intention to treat [n = 405]/per protocol [n = 320]) were similar for PAC7 (78%/82%) and PBTM7 (82%/88%); the latter significantly superior to BTM14 (69%/74%; P < 0.01). Pretreatment metronidazole resistance (MR) was 53% and clarithromycin resistance was 8%. Eradication rates for primary metronidazole sensitive/resistant isolates were 74%/87% with PAC7 and 80%/81% for PBTM7, compared with 76%/55% (P < 0.02) for BTM14. Noncompliance was greater with BTM14 (15%; P < 0.001) than PAC7 (3%) or PBTM7 (6%). Moderate-severe adverse events were more common with BTM14 (45%; P < 0.001), than PAC7 (23%) or PBTM7 (25%) with more discontinuations (9%, 2%, 3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: One-week PPI triple therapy is well tolerated and effective. The addition of PPI to bismuth triple therapy allows reduction of treatment duration with improved efficacy and tolerability, despite a high rate of MR. Quadruple therapy appears to overcome pretreatment MR in most cases. Two-week bismuth triple therapy is significantly inferior to quadruple therapy and less well tolerated than both 1-week therapies.     

Comparison of ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole with ranitidine bismuth citrate and azithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients resistant to PPI based triple therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori is the most common infectious disease all over the world. Ten to twenty percent of the patients remain infected despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), amoxicillin and clarithromycin. We compared PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole with ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole in cases resistant to PPIs-based triple therapies. METHODS: The study included 52 patients who underwent a triple therapy with PPI, clarithromycin and amoxicillin for 14 days between September 2001 and December 2002, and were found to be resistant to the therapy. They were randomized to take ranitidine bismuth citrate (Rb) 400 mg twice a day, tetracycline (T) 1 g twice a day and metronidazole (M) 500 mg three times a day for 14 days (RbTM), or ranitidine bismuth citrate (Rb) 400 mg twice a day for 14 days and azithromycin (A) 500 mg once a day for 7 days (RbA). Four weeks after the treatment, endoscopies were repeated, and patients were assessed with respect to changes in symptoms. When H. pylori was negative on histological analysis and urease test, eradication was achieved. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients, 32 females and 20 males with a mean age of 49+/-12 years, were included in the study. Eradication was achieved in 15 (28%) out of 52 patients in total. There was a significant difference between RbA and RbTM groups (p=0.01). In fact, H. pylori was eradicated in 3 (12%) out of 25 patients in the RbA group, whereas it was eradicated in 12 (44.4%) out of 27 patients in the RbTM group. Symptom scores significantly improved in both groups after the treatment, though there was not a significant difference between the groups (p=0.705). CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy including azithromycin does not seem to be a good choice in cases resistant to the first line therapies; however, a similarly lower rate of eradication was achieved with the quadruple therapy proposed. Therefore, different treatment schemes should be applied in resistant patients, and further studies are needed as well.     

A randomized controlled comparison of three quadruple therapy regimens in a population with low Helicobacter pylori eradication rates

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We sought to compare the efficacy and tolerability of an omeprazole/clarithromycin/bismuth/tetracycline-based quadruple therapy to that of a ranitidine/metronidazole/bismuth/tetracycline-based quadruple therapy of 2 or 3 weeks duration in a population with a high prevalence of metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori and low triple therapy eradication rates. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-one patients who presented endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers and a positive rapid urease test were randomized to receive either: (i) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d. and tetracycline 500 mg b.i.d (OCBT) for 2 weeks; (ii) ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d. and tetracycline 500 mg b.i.d. (RMBT2) for 2 weeks; or (iii) ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d. and tetracycline 500 mg b.i.d. (RMBT3) for 3 weeks. Patients were interviewed 2 weeks after the completion of therapy to review compliance and side-effects. Eradication of H. pylori was assessed 8 weeks after the completion of therapy with the use of a 14C-urea breath test. RESULTS: The per-protocol eradication rate was significantly higher with OCBT (88%) than RMBT2 (73%) or RMBT3 (71%) (P<0.05). The intent-to-treat eradication rate was numerically higher with OCBT (80%) than RMBT2 (68%) or RMBT3 (68%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.09). Per-protocol or intent-to-treat eradication rates were similar with RMBT2 and RMBT3. There were significantly greater side-effects with the RMBT2 regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole/clarithromycin/bismuth/tetracycline-based quadruple therapy provides higher H. pylori eradication rates than the ranitidine/metronidazole/bismuth/tetracycline-based quadruple therapy when administered per protocol. The prolongation of the latter regimen from 2 to 3 weeks did not increase eradication rates.     

泮托拉唑四联5d疗法与7d疗法随机对照研究

目的:比较泮妥拉唑四联5d疗法和7d疗法的Hpylori根除率和症状缓解率.方法:H pylori阳性的胃炎、胃溃疡或十二指肠患者70例随机接受5d(34例)或7d(36例)泮妥拉唑四联疗法:泮妥拉唑40mg、克拉霉素250mg、阿莫西林1.0g和胶体枸橼酸铋钾220 mg,均为2次/d.根除治疗后第4周复查H pylori是否根除,了解症状缓解情况.结果:5d组H pylori根除率为84.8%(PP)和82.4%(ITT),7d组H pylori根除率为88.2%(PP)和83.3%(ITT),5d组疼痛缓解率为72.0%(PP)和69.2%(ITT),7d组疼痛缓解率为83.9%(ITT)和89.7%(PP).按PP及ITT组群分析,两组方案H pylori根除率及疼痛缓解率无明显差异,两组患者均未出现严重不良反应.结论:泮妥拉唑四联5d疗法可以获得较高的H pylori根除率和疼痛缓解率,可以作为H pylori根除治疗的一线治疗方案.     

Levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. This study evaluated the eradication rate, tolerability, and compliance of levofloxacin- azithromycin combined triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: 1) First-line eradication: A total of 78 H. pylori-positive patients were enrolled. Seventeen military men in Armed Forces Capital Hospital were treated with 7 days of levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, levofloxacin 500 mg od, and azithromycin 500 mg od), and 61 patients in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital were treated with standard PPI-based triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1.0 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid) for 7 days. 2) Second-line eradication: A consecutive series of 59 patients who failed H. pylori eradication with standard PPI-based triple therapy in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital were randomized to two groups. Thirty patients were retreated with 7 days of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth 120 mg qid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg qid), and remaining 29 patients were retreated with levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy. Patient's compliance and tolerability were evaluated at the end of treatment. The status of H. pylori infection was assessed 8 weeks later then. The successful eradication of H. pylori was defined as negative results from histology and CLO test, or 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: First-line eradication rate of levofloxacin-azithromycin triple therapy was lower than that of standard PPI-based triple therapy, but there was no statistically significant difference (70.6% vs. 80.3%, p=0.390). Second-line eradication rate of levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy was significantly lower than that of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (ITT/PP 65.5%/73.1% vs. 90%/90%, p<0.0001). The compliances of all patients were more than 85%. Two of patients with levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy complained self-limiting side effects (mild dizziness; mild insomnia with general weakness). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy should not be recommended as the first-line or second-line H. pylori eradication regimen in Korea.     

Effectiveness of triple therapy and quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Quadruple therapy can be considered as a first-line therapy in areas where the resistance rate to clarithromycin is high. Comparison study of triple therapy and quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is still lacking in Korea despite the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of triple and quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment in H. pylori infected patients with peptic ulcer. METHODS: Consecutive 149 cases of peptic ulcer disease associated with H. pylori infection were randomized either to proton pump inhibitor (PPI, bid), amoxicillin (1,000 mg, bid), and clarithromycin (500 mg, bid) (PAC group) or to PPI (bid), bismuth subcitrate (300 mg, qid), metronidazole (500 mg, tid), and tetracycline (500 mg, qid) (PBMT group) eradication treatments for 7 days. Outcome of eradication therapy was assessed by 13C-urea breath test performed 4-6 weeks after eradication. RESULTS: Eradication rates in PAC and PBMT group were 78.7% (59/75) and 71.6% (53/74) by intention to treat analysis, respectively (p=0.424). By per protocol analysis, eradication rates of PAC and PBMT group were 85.5% (59/69) and 85.5% (53/62), respectively (p=1.012). Adverse reactions occurred in 5 (6.6%) and 7 (9.5%) patients in PAC and PBMT group, respectively (p=0.346). CONCLUSIONS: One week-quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection does not offer any advantage over PPI-based triple therapy in Korean patients.     

胶体果胶铋联合泮托拉唑三联治疗H.pylori阳性胃溃疡的疗效分析

目的观察胶体果胶铋联合泮托拉唑三联对H.pylori阳性胃溃疡的溃疡愈合质量的影响以及根除H.pylori的疗效。方法将经胃镜检查及14C呼气试验确诊的90例H.pylori阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为两组:对照组45例,口服泮托拉唑40 mg bid+左氧氟沙星200 mg bid+阿莫西林1 000 mg bid,连续口服10 d后,停服阿莫西林及左氧氟沙星,继续口服泮托拉唑40 mg qd维持3周;试验组45例,在对照组的基础上加用胶体果胶铋干混悬剂150 mg qid。停药4周后复查14C呼气试验,观察H.pylori根除情况;疗程结束后,胃镜复查评估溃疡愈合情况。结果试验组和对照组H.pylori根除率分别为88.89%、71.11%,两组相比,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);溃疡愈合率分别为86.67%、68.89%,两组相比,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组溃疡愈合S2期获得率57.78%,显著高于对照组的33.33%(P0.05)。结论胶体果胶铋联合泮托拉唑三联治疗H.pylori阳性胃溃疡是一种高效、简便、安全的临床方案,胶体果胶铋在抗H.pylori、提高溃疡愈合质量上起着重要作用。