机器人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植与支架置入"杂交"手术治疗多支冠状动脉病变

目的 总结达芬奇S机器人系统行非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植与支架置入"杂交"手术治疗多支冠状动脉病变的技术特点和优势.方法 2007年至2011年,使用da Vinic S全机器人系统完成非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术163例,其中12例患者因两支或三支冠状动脉病变,在机器人手术后行分站式支架置入术.男9例,女3例;年龄(56.0±9.7)岁;均有心绞痛症状,冠状动脉造影显示严重的前降支或对角支病变,合并回旋支或右冠状动脉的病变;4例有心肌梗死病史.先对所有患者前降支病变行机器人非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术,术后待患者恢复平稳再行其他病变冠状动脉支架置入术.冠状动脉造影评价在再血管化效果.结果 所有患者均成功接受机器人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术,术后恢复顺利,随后成功接受支架置入术.全组无并发症.结论 机器人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植和支架置入"杂交"手术可最大限度的减小手术创伤并实现冠状动脉完全再血管化.

Abstract：

Objective Summary the first group of robotic bypass surgery on the beating heart and stent placement in distinct hybrid session in China. Methods 163 cases patients accepted selective operation of robotic coronary bypass grafting on the beating heart form April 2007 to January 2011. 12 cases had multi coronary vessels stenosis accepted stent placement after robotic surgery in a hybrid manner. The average age of patients was ( 56. 0 ± 9.74 ) years old. 3 case was female and 9 cases were male. All the patients had a medical history of angina. The coronary arterioangiography showed sever left anterior descend ing or diagonal branch stenosis in all patients. And 4 cases had myocardial infarction history. All the patients had good lung function and had no medical history of pleurisy. Without sternotomy, through 3 ports about 1 cm in left thorax, the left internal mammary artery was obtained and simultaneously single vessel coronary artery bypass grafting through small thoracotomy or totally endoscopic coronary bypass (TECAB) was performed on beating heart. The bridge patency and revascularization was accessed by arterioangiography. Results All cases successfully accepted robotic bypass surgery on the beating heart and stent placement in distinct hybrid session without complication. Conclusion Hybrid coronary artery revascularization enable adequate revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease without sternotomy and with the advantage of the most durable option.     

右美托咪啶对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者心肌损伤的影响

目的 评价右美托咪啶对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者心肌损伤的影响.方法 择期非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者46例,性别不限,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级,年龄37～64岁,采用随机数字表法,将其随机分为2组(n=23),两组麻醉诱导及麻醉维持方法相同.右美托眯啶组(D组)于麻醉诱导后持续静脉输注右美托咪啶0.5 μg·kg-1∶h-1至术毕,对照组(C组)给予等容量生理盐水.分别于手术开始、血管吻合完毕、血管吻合完毕后30 min和术毕时记录平均肺动脉压、肺毛细血管楔压;中心静脉压和心输出量,计算每搏指数、左室每搏功指数、右室每搏功指数、周围血管阻力和肺血管阻力.分别于麻醉诱导前、术毕、术后4 h和术后24 h时采集静脉血样,采用ELISA法测定血浆心肌肌钙蛋白Ⅰ浓度.结果 与C组比较,D组术毕时每搏指数和左室每搏功指数升高,血管吻合完毕后30 min和术毕时周围血管阻力降低,术后24 h时血浆cTnI浓度降低(P＜0.05);其余血液动力学指标组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 术中静脉输注右美托咪啶0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1可减轻非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者心肌损伤.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the cardioprotective effect of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods Forty-six ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ patients aged 37-64 yr weighing 54-81 kg undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized into 2 groups ( n = 23 each): control group (group C) and dexmedetomidine group (group D) . Dexmedetomidine was infused at 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 starting after induction of anesthesia until the end of operation in group D. Radial artery was cannulated and Swan-Ganz catheter placed via right internal jugular vein. HR, MAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary capilary wedge pressure, central venous pressure, and cardiac output were recorded and stroke volume index, left and right ventricular stroke work index, systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance were calculated at the beginning of operation (T1 ), immediately (T2 ) and at 30 min after reestablishment of coronary blood flow (T3 ) and the end of operation (T4 ) . Venous blood samples were taken before induction of anesthesia (T0 , baseline) , at T4 and 4 h (T5 ) and 24 h (T6 ) after operation for determination of plasma concentration of cardiac troponin I by ELISA. Results Stroke volume index and left ventricular stroke work index were significantly higher at T4 while systemic vascular resistance was lower at T34 in group D than in group C. Plasma cardiac troponin Ⅰ concentration was significantly lower at T6 in group D than in group C. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.5 μg ·kg-1·h-1 during operation can protect myocardium in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.     

非体外循环下机器人冠状动脉旁路移植手术的麻醉管理

目的 总结非体外循环机器人冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的麻醉技术.方法 2007年1月至2011年3月共完成机器人心脏跳动下冠状动脉旁路移植手术163例,其中62例全机器人冠状动脉旁路移植手术,101例机器人辅助肋间小切口冠状动脉旁路移植手术.麻醉均采用全麻,左侧双腔气管插管.结果 术中单肺通气和CO2气胸引起动脉氧分压(PaO2)和静脉氧饱和度显著降低,163例患者中有17例出现低氧,SpO2降至0.92.使用5～15 cmH2O的持续气道正压后,PaO2从(59±12)mm Hg升至(115±23)mm Hg(P<0.05).CO2气胸开始阶段平均动脉压和心脏指数明显降低,同时伴有平均肺动脉压增高、心率加快,经快速补液和使用血管活性药得以纠正.术后(7.5±3.1)h拔管,ICU停留平均21h.1例因肺部感染在ICU治疗3天;1例行二次手术止血.全部患者术后住院4～7天.结论 非体外循环机器人冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的单肺通气和CO2气胸对患者循环和呼吸功能的影响是麻醉管理的关键.心脏外科医师和麻醉医师要熟练掌握单肺通气和CO2气胸的相关技术知识,恰当处理术中缺氧和血流动力学波动.

Abstract：

Objective Anesthesia for endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting surgery on beating heart to deal with the hemodynamic compromise, hypoxia and hypercarbia relevant to one lung ventilation ( OLV ) and intrathoracic inflation of CO2 with positive pressure (CO2 pneumothorax) is crucial. Methods Between February 2007 and January 2011, 163 patients underwent robotically assisted coronary artery bypass surgery on beating heart using the da Vinci S Surgical System. Of them, 62 patients underwent totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting ( TECAB). Other 101 patients underwent robotically assisted endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass ( ENDOACAB) in which the left internal mammary artery was harvested robotically and direct anastomosis via a small left anterior thoractomy incision. Results PaO2 and SvO2 after initiate of OLV and CO2 pneumothorax showed a significant decrease. Meanwhile, the SpO2 decreased to 0.92 in 17 of the 163 patients.In these patients, application of CPAP setting 5-15 cmH2O to the collapsed lung resulted in an increase in PaO2 from (59 ±12) mmHg to (115 ±23) mmHg (P < 0.05). At the beginning of CO2 pneumothorax the most dramatic fall in MAP and CI was showed with an increase in MPAP and HR. The hemodynamie compromise was counteracted by transfusion and inotropes/ vasopressors. Postoperatively, the average extubation time was (7. 5 ±3. 1) hours, and median ICU length of stay was 21 hours. One patient remained in the ICU for 3 days for treatment of a postoperative pneumonia. One patient who had underwent ENDOACAB were reexplored for bleeding in the left anterior thoracotomy incision. All patients were discharged home 4 to 7 days after surgery. Conclusion Anesthetic management for the procedures requires detailed knowledge of OLV and CO2 pneumothorax in addition to expertise required in conventional cardiac surgery.     

非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术后病人的护理

非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pumpcoronary artery bypass grafting,OPCAB)是指应用药物和特殊手术器械以减弱跳动心脏的动度而进行冠状动脉旁路     

体外循环与非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术移植血管流量对比分析

目的比较非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump coronary artery bypass graft,OPCABG)与传统体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass graft,CCABG)移植血管通畅性。方法利用瞬时血流测定技术(transit-time flow meter,TTFM)对105例CCABG和140例OPCABG移植血管进行测量,并记录平均流量(mean flow,Qm)及搏动指数(pulsatility index,PI)。结果2组一般情况无显著性差异,2组旁路移植血管数目及血管材料无差异。流量测定结果,乳内动脉OPCABG组(n=101)Qm(37.2±26.6)ml/min,PI3.3±1.3;CCABG组(n=75)Qm(39.5±21.8)ml/min,PI3.3±1.2,两组差异无显著性(t=-0.612、0.000,P>0.05),大隐静脉流量两组也无显著性差异[OPCABG组(n=335)Qm(36.8±27.4)ml/min,PI3.1±1.5;CCABG组(n=281)Qm(40.9±...     

再次冠状动脉旁路移植术42例临床分析

目的 总结再次冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的临床特点及手术效果.方法 对2002年1月至2010年12月连续收治的42例CABG术后患者行再次CABG.其中男性29例,女性13例;年龄46～78岁,平均(61.2±2.1)岁.非体外循环CABG患者31例,心肺转流下CABG患者11例,同期分别行主动脉瓣置换术及主动脉根部替换+右半主动脉弓置换术各1例.结果 全组死亡3例,1例因术中右心室破裂死亡,1例因术后心力衰竭死亡,1例发生肾功能衰竭导致多器官功能衰竭死亡,围手术期病死率为4.8%.其余40例术后呼吸机辅助呼吸时间9～27 h,平均(17±7)h.术后心绞痛均消失,围手术期无心肌梗死发生,顺利恢复出院.术中接受主动脉内球囊反搏6例.术后随访38例,随访时间6～54个月,均无心绞痛发作;12例复查冠状动脉CTA,显示移植血管均通畅.结论 随着手术技巧和围手术期管理的改进,合理采用各种技术,再次冠状动脉旁路移植术可以取得满意疗效.

Abstract：

Objective To determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of redo CABG.Methods The outcomes of 42 consecutive patients who underwent redo CABG from January 2002 to December 2010 was analyzed.There were 29 males and 13 females,aging from 46 to 78 years old with a mean of(61.2 ± 2.1)years.Off-pump CABG was applied for 31 patients and on-pump CABG for 11 patients.There were 1 patient underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement and 1 patient underwent aortic root and right aortic arch replacement respectively.Results Three patients died of right ventricle rupture,heart failure and multiple system organ failure respectively and the perioperative mortality rate was 4.8%.The post-operatively mechanical ventilation time varied from 9 to 27 h with a mean of(17 ±7)h.There was no residual angina and perioperative myocardial infarction in the remaining patients who were all discharged uneventfully.Intraoperative 6 patients had accepted intraaortic balloon counterpulsation.During the followup from 6 months to 4.5 years for 38 patients,which showed no evidence of recurrent angina and postoperative coronary CT angiography in 12 patients showed the patency of grafts is good.Conclusion Satisfactory outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting can be achieved if proper indication were choosed and reasonable management were performed.     

常规与非体外循环下冠状动脉3支病变旁路移植血管通畅性对比分析

目的　评价非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)与体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CCABG)治疗冠状动脉三支病变术中旁路早期通畅性。方法　 6 0例 3支血管病变的病人分为OPCAB组和CCABG组 ,每组各 30例。行冠状动脉旁路移植术 ,OPCAB组胸骨正中切口 ,在非体外循环心脏不停跳下完成手术 ;CCABG组建立常规体外循环 ,心脏停跳下完成手术。术中应用即时血流测量技术对旁路血管进行流量测量。对比分析两组术前、术后的各项指标及各血管旁路流量、搏动指数和血流波形。结果　两组病人术前一般情况差异无统计学意义。OPCAB组与CCABG组移植旁路血管分别为 (3 6±0 6 )支与 (4 3± 0 9)支 (P <0 0 1) ;两组前降支及右冠状动脉旁路血流量、搏动指数差异无显著性。CCABG组回旋支序贯旁路和远端吻合口多 ,血流量较OPCAB组高。两组弥漫病变血管旁路血流量小。结论　OPCAB与CCABG治疗 3支病变 ,两组血管旁路早期通畅性差异无显著性。     

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后再发脑卒中的临床分析

目的 探讨非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植(OPCABG)术后再发脑卒中的危险因素及临床特点.方法 收集2006年1月至2009年7月437例OPCABG手术并且术前具有脑卒中史病人资料,采集病人手术前、后资料,根据术后有无再发脑卒中分成两组,进行单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析.结果 437例中术后再发脑卒中32例(7.3%),均为脑梗塞,无脑出血病例.单因素分析发现左室射血分数≤0.50、术后房颤与低血压在两组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).呼吸机辅助时间＞24 h、ICU时间＞24 h及住院时间在两组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).多因素logistic回归分析结果表明,左室射血分数≤0.50(OR=2.837,95%CI:1.238～6.498)、术后房颤(OR=3.065,95%CI:1.157～8.118)与术后低血压(OR=4.209,95%CI:1.805～9.813)是术后再发脑卒中的独立危险因素.结论 左室射血分数≤0.50、术后房颤与低血压是OPCABG术后再发脑卒中的独立危险因素.OPCABG术后再发脑卒中者术后恢复较术后无脑卒中者差.

Abstract：

Objective To analyze the risk factors and clinical features of stroke following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with prior stroke. Methods From January 2006 to July 2009, the clinical information of 437 patients undergoing OPCABC in Anzhen Hospital was collected. The patients were divided into stroke group and non-stroke group according to whether stroke occurred after operation. Preoperative and operative variants were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic stepwise regression analysis. Results 32 of 437 patients (7.3% ) suffered from stroke after OPCABG, 32 cases were cerebral infarction and no case was cerebral hemorrhage. There were more patients whose left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0. 50 in stroke group than that in non-stroke group (12 of 32, 37.5% versus 69 of 405, 17.0% , P = 0. 004), more patients had atrial fibrillation after operation in stroke group than that in non-stroke group (9 of 32, 28. 1% versus 27 of 405,6.7% , P ＜ 0.001), more patients had hypotension after operation in stroke group than that in non-stroke group (13 of 32,40.6% versus 42 of 405, 10. 4% ; P ＜ 0. 001), more patients had ventilatory time and ICU time after operation in stroke group than that in non-stroke group(9 of 32, 28.1% versus 49 of 405, 12.1% , P =0.021; 14of 32,43.8% versus 97 of 405, 24.0% , P = 0.013), and patients in stroke group took longer to stay in hospital than that in non-stroke group (29.0 ±15. 8 versus 22. 9 ± 10. 4, P = 0. 002 ). Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that left ventricular ejection fraction SS0.50(OR=2.837, 95%CI: 1.238-6.498), atrial fibrillation after operation( OR =3. 065, 95% CI: 1.157-8.118) and hypotension after operation (OR =4.209, 95%CI: 1.805 -9. 813) were independent risk factors of stroke following offpump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with prior stroke. Conclusion This data suggest that left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0. 50, atrial fibrillation and hypotension after operation are risk factors for stroke following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with prior stroke. These patients with stroke after operation took longer to extubate and stay in ICU and hospital.     

"杂交"手术治疗DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层

目的 总结应用无深低温停循环的升主动脉置换、升主动脉-主动脉弓分支血管旁路、腔内隔绝的"杂交"手术治疗DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层的方法和经验.方法 2009年1月至2010年6月,39例、平均年龄(55±16)岁的DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层病人进行无深低温停循环的"杂交"手术.病人经股动脉、右腋动脉插管灌注,先于常规体外循环下行升主动脉和主动脉瓣置换,再采用四分支人工血管、"Y"形人工血管或单根人工血管行升主动脉-主动脉弓分支血管旁路手术,再经股动脉逆行径路数字减影血管造影(DSA)下或术中顺行径路食管超声定位下行主动脉弓-降主动脉腔内隔绝术.结果 全组均手术成功,升主动脉处理时8例行单纯升主动脉人工血管置换,20例行Bentall手术(其中冠状动脉移位采用Carbrol法11例),11例行Wheat手术;升主动脉-主动脉弓分支血管旁路手术采用四分支人工血管16例、"Y"形人工血管15例、单根人工血管序贯法8例;主动脉弓-降主动脉腔内隔绝术采用DSA下股动脉逆行径路36例,术中人工血管分支顺行径路3例,均使用1枚支架.体外循环(61±22)min,主动脉阻断(48±18)min.术后(30±9)h拔除气管插管,24 h胸液小于300 ml,无偏瘫、截瘫、严重感染、凝血障碍等并发症.所有病人均治愈出院,平均术后(21±6)天出院.术后随访1～15个月,平均(8.4±7.2)个月,病人均健康生存,无脏器功能不全.术后3个月行CT主动脉血管成像检查,显示膈肌水平假腔闭合率为91.2%.结论 常温体外循环下升主动脉置换、升主动脉-弓部血管旁路、腔内隔绝的"杂交"手术治疗DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层,简化了DeBakey Ⅰ型主动脉夹层外科治疗方法,该手术方法避免了深低温停循环,减少了术后并发症,提高了外科治疗效果.

Abstract：

Objective Some major procedures for DeBakey type Ⅰ aortic dissection used to be performed with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, which had been associated with more complications than seen with standard extracorporeal circulation. We reviewed the cases who received the treatment for DeBakey type Ⅰ aortic dissection by hybrid procedure without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The procedure consisted of ascending aorta replacement, ascending aorta-aortic arch branch vascular bypass reconstruction and endovascular graft exclusion. Methods From January 2009 to June 2010, 39 patients [mean age (55 ±16) years] who had DeBakey Ⅰ aortic dissection underwent hybrid procedure without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The femoral artery and right axillary artery were cannulated for perfusion. The ascending aorta and/or aortic valves were replaced under conventional extracorporeal circulation with Bentall procedure or Wheat procedure. The aortic arch branch vessels were dissected and the proximal part was sealed. Then the ascending aorta-aortic arch branch vascular bypasses were constructed with 4-bifurcation vascular grafts, Y-shape bifurcated vascular grafts or artificial vessels. Finally the endovascular grafts were deployed via the femoral incisions monitored dynamically with DSA, or via the ascending aortic bifurcated vessels monitored with transesophageal echocardiography. Results The operation succeeded in all 39 patients. Eight patients underwent ascending aorta replacement without aortic valve replacement or prosthesis, 20 patients underwent Bentall procedure ( Carbrol procedure were used in 11 cases), and 11 underwent Wheat procedure. For ascending aorta-aortic branch vascular bypass reconstruction, sequential anastomoses were performed in 8, Y-shaped bifurcated grafts were used in 15, and 4-bifurcated grafts were employed in 16 patients. The endovascular stent grafts were deployed via the former femoral incisions in 36 patients and via ascending aortic bifurcated vessels in 3. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was (61 ±22) minutes, the aortic crossclamp time was (48 ±18) minutes, and the post-operative intubation time was (30 ±9) hours. The thoracic drainage from each patient was less than 300 ml in 24 hours. No complication, such as hemiplegia, paraplegia, severe infections, renal failure or coagulation disorder, was observed. The duration of hospitalization was (21 ±6) days. No hospital death occurred. Follow-up was performed 1 to 15 months [mean (8.4 ±7.2) months] postoperatively. All patients survived without any organ dysfunction at follow up. The CTA examination 3 months after operation revealed that the false lumens had been closed in 91.2% of the patients. Conclusion Our findings indicated that the hybrid procedure, which combining ascending aorta replacement,ascending aorta-aortic arch branch vascular bypass reconstruction and endovascular graft exclusion under conventional extracorporeal circulation, may be an option for avoiding the possible complications associated with profound hypothermic circulatory arrest. The novel hybrid operation may improve the surgical outcomes and provide a simplified surgical approach for the treatment of DeBakey Ⅰ aortic dissection.     

非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术

目的　探讨和评价微创非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)的临床效果。　方法　 38例 OPCAB患者中左冠状动脉主干病变 4例 ,1支血管病变 10例 ,2支 14例 ,3支 10例 ,均经胸骨正中切口行 OPCAB,每例移植血管 1～ 5支 ,平均移植血管 2 .42支。应用左乳内动脉 38支 ,大隐静脉 5 4支。　结果　全组无手术死亡 ,36例顺利完成手术 ,2例转为心肺转流术下冠状动脉旁路移植术。38例均在手术后 2～ 12小时 ,平均 4.9± 2 .6小时顺利拔除气管内插管。全组均顺利康复 ,15例手术后 1个月内恢复了原工作。　结论　对有适应证的患者 ,OPCAB是一项安全有效的术式     

冠状动脉内膜剥脱联合旁路移植治疗弥漫性冠状动脉狭窄病变的近中期效果

目的探讨冠状动脉内膜剥脱术(CE)联合冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗弥漫性冠状动脉狭窄病变的近中期效果。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2019年1月在南京市第一医院心胸血管外科接受CE+CABG的248例弥漫性冠状动脉狭窄病变患者的临床资料。男性201例,女性47例;年龄(65.6±8.5)岁(范围:43~79岁)。体外循环手术156例,非体外循环手术92例。共对269根病变血管完成CE,包括前降支108根,右冠状动脉140根,钝缘支21根。共完成旁路移植872支,包括左胸廓内动脉248支,桡动脉48支,大隐静脉576支,每例患者移植(3.5±0.8)支(范围:2~6支)。CE后平均血流量为(26±8)ml/min(范围:13~59 ml/min),血流指数为3.1±0.8(范围:2.0~6.7)。采用t检验或χ²检验比较体外循环和非体外循环患者的手术结果及术后通畅率。结果全组围手术期病死率为1.2%(3/248),2例死于肾功能衰竭,1例死于术后顽固性低心排血量。9例发生围手术期心肌梗死。随访(41.8±21.4)个月(范围:1~68个月)。旁路血管术后1年通畅率为78.4%(182/232),3年通畅率为69.8%(162/232)。左冠状动脉系统通畅率明显高于右冠状动脉系统(1年:87.4%比73.1%,χ²=6.533,P=0.011;3年:78.2%比64.8%,χ²=4.588,P=0.032)。体外循环组和非体外循环组旁路血管通畅率无差异(1年:80.0%比76.9%,χ²=0.277,P=0.599;3年:71.5%比67.9%,χ²=0.300,P=0.584)。结论CE+CABG治疗弥漫性冠状动脉狭窄病变可以获得较满意的完全再血管化,有较好的早、中期效果和旁路血管通畅率。体外循环和非体外循环手术具有相似的早中期结果。     

糖尿病病人行OPCAB与CCABG的早期结果对比

目的 比较糖尿病病人非体外循环和经典体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植(OPCAB和CCABG)的术后早期临床结果.方法 1999年4月至2008年1月,318例糖尿病病人行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG).OPCAB 210例,CCABG 108例.两组术前总体情况差异无统计学意义.OPCAB在非体外循环、心脏跳动下完成,CCABG在体外循环、心脏停跳下完成.正中开胸,胸膜外游离带蒂左乳内动脉(LIMA),与左前降支(LAD)吻合,大隐静脉(GSV)与其他靶血管吻合,吻合口超过2个采用序贯吻合.术前口服降糖药或皮下注射胰岛素将血糖控制在6 mmol/L以下,术后早期在ICU时持续泵入胰岛素,将血糖控制在6～8mmol/L.结果 两组共5例(1.57%)死亡,7例(2.20%)发生并发症.两组均达到完全再血管化,平均移植旁路血管OPCAB组(2.6±1.1)支,低于CCABG组的(3.1±1.3)支,P＜0.05.OWCAB组死亡1例(0.48%),明显低于CCABG组4例(3.70%),P＜0.05.OPCAB组发生并发症5例(2.30%),CCABG组2例(1.85%),组间差异无统计学意义,P＞0.05.结论 糖尿病者冠状动脉旁路移植手术围术期严格控制血糖至接近正常水平,住院病死率和并发症率低.OWAB术后早期病死率明显低于CCABG.     

心脏不停跳非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的进展

近年来，随着手术器械的发展，心脏不停跳非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)逐渐被广泛接受和应用。与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)比较，OPCAB的主要优势为血液中多种炎性介质浓度明显降低，避免了体外循环(CPB)带来的全身系统性炎性损害，减少了并发症，降低了手术死亡率。特别对那些不能采用CPB或采用CPB有风险的高危患者优势更明显。CCABG的手术适应证同样适用于OPCAB，但OPCAB具有相对的禁忌证。OPCAB多采用胸骨正中切口，左前外侧切口适用于左前降支单支病变。OPCAB术后早期结果类似CCABG，但中远期结果有待进一步观察。OPCAB大多数旁路移植血管数低于CCABG，有不能完全再血管化的可能，对OPCAB是否会影响吻合的精确性和旁路血管的长期通畅率有不同意见。OPCAB的优势明确，但仍不能完全替代CCABG，手术的同时应作好CPB准备，必要时改行CCABG。     

Intraoperative assessment and quantification of coronary artery graft patency performed on or off cardiopulmonary bypass

Within the last 10 years, the incorporation of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) into many surgical practices has grown. OPCAB requires the surgeon to operate on a beating heart, and it is generally accepted that OPCAB procedures are more technically demanding. Concerns of possible incomplete revascularizations and decreased graft patency have been noted in the literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare on-pump and off-pump intraoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) flow parameters. Intraoperative flow studies conducted with the Butterfly (Medi-Stim Norge AS, Oslo, Norway) flow meter were analyzed retrospectively on 74 patients. Comparisons were completed between patient groups having had their revascularizations performed on or off cardiopulmonary bypass. Our study revealed significant differences in the mean flow rate through saphenous vein grafts (SVG) to the obtuse marginal artery (OM; p = .014), to the diagonal artery (Diag; p = .003), to the right coronary artery (RCA; p = .001), and to the posterior descending artery (PDA; p = .001). Total blood product use showed significantly increased use of both platelets (PLTs) and cryoprecipitate (Cryo) in the on-pump group (p = .027 and .012, respectively). No differences were found for transfusions of red blood cells (RBCs) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Additional findings showed a significantly decreased median length of stay (LOS) for the off-pump group. The on-pump patients had a median hospital stay of 7 days (range, 4-24 days), whereas the off-pump patients had a median stay of 6 days (range, 3-22 days; p = .049). Although we were able to show some significance in the mean flow data supporting increased graft flow with the on-pump technique, we were not able to show an overall increase in all recorded flow characteristics to support one method over another.     

体外循环与非体外循环下冠脉搭桥术患者术中血液动力学的比较

目的比较体外循环(CPB)与非CPB下冠脉搭桥术患者术中血液动力学的变化。方法同期行CPB下冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)与非CPB下冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)患者各70例,分别为CABG组和OPCAB组,分别在麻醉诱导后手术开始前(术前)和术毕用Swan-Ganz导管监测血液动力学指标。结果与术前比较,两组术毕心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、肺动脉平均压(PAMP)、肺毛细血管嵌压(PAWP)、中心静脉压(CVP)及左室作功指数(LVSWI)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),心输出量(CO)、心脏指数(CI)均升高;OPCAB组术毕心搏指数(SVI)升高,体循环阻力指数(SVRI)、肺循环阻力指数(PVRI)降低(P<0.05),CABG组术毕SVI、SVRI、PVRI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与CABG组比较,OPCAB组术毕SVRI、PVRI降低(P<0.05)。结论两组患者术后心功能均得到了改善,OPCAB 组在改善心功能、降低体、肺循环阻力方面,优于CABG组。     

70岁以上患者冠状动脉旁路移植术

目的 总结70岁以上患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的经验,就伴发疾病的处理、手术适应证、手术技术及效果进行分析. 方法 2004年3月至2008年3月,采用冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗70岁以上高龄患者91例,年龄70～83岁.75岁以上者22例.心肺转流冠状动脉旁路移植组(CCABG组)72例,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植组(OPCAB组)19例.两组术前临床资料无明显差异.其中CCABG组术前植入颈动脉支架2例,肾动脉支架2例;OPCAB组植入颈动脉支架2例,肾动脉支架1例.全组左侧胸廓内动脉使用率为96.7%;CCABG组心肺转流时间(108±34)min;主动脉阻断时间(70±22)min;搭桥数(3.5±0.8)支.OPCAB组搭桥数(2.9±0.7)支. 结果 全组住院死亡2例,均为慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺感染.CCABG组有1例脑梗死,2例肺部感染,但与OPCAB组相比差异无统计学意义.两组在呼吸机辅助时间、ICU时间、呼吸衰竭、急性肾功能衰竭、二次开胸等方面无明显差异.但CCABG组搭桥支数高于OPCAB组(P<0.01).术后随访3～36个月,OPCAB组1例复发心绞痛,药物控制有效. 结论 处理好伴发疾病,充分再血管化,最大限度改善心肌供血,70岁以上CABG患者也可以取得满意疗效.是否在心肺转流下手术,预后并无明显差异.     

体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后心肌梗死发生率的Meta分析

目的 使用Meta分析比较常规体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)术后心肌梗死发生率的差异.方法 在 Medline、SCI、Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)和中国生物医学文献光盘数据库(CBMdisc)检索中文和英文的相天随机对照临床试验,并检索相关文献的参考文献,检索时间截止至2009年1月.根据严格的纳入和排除标准,两名评价员独立地筛选文献,并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.0.0版所建议的评价方法 对纳入临床试验进行质量评价,最后将提取的资料用RevMan 5软件进行数据处理和分析.结果 共纳入22个试验进行Meta分析,OPCAB组共纳入1494例病人,心肌梗死总发生率为2.81%;CCABG组共1512例,心肌梗死总发生率为3.57%.Meta分析结果 显示OPCAB和CCABG术后心肌梗死发生率的差异尤统计学意义(OR=0.80,95%CI=0.54～1.20,P=0.28).结论 依据现有的随机对照试验进行Meta分析结果 显示,OPCAB和CCABG术后心肌梗死发生率的差异无统计学意义.     

体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后心肌梗死发生率的Meta分析

目的 使用Meta分析比较常规体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)术后心肌梗死发生率的差异.方法 在 Medline、SCI、Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)和中国生物医学文献光盘数据库(CBMdisc)检索中文和英文的相天随机对照临床试验,并检索相关文献的参考文献,检索时间截止至2009年1月.根据严格的纳入和排除标准,两名评价员独立地筛选文献,并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.0.0版所建议的评价方法 对纳入临床试验进行质量评价,最后将提取的资料用RevMan 5软件进行数据处理和分析.结果 共纳入22个试验进行Meta分析,OPCAB组共纳入1494例病人,心肌梗死总发生率为2.81%;CCABG组共1512例,心肌梗死总发生率为3.57%.Meta分析结果 显示OPCAB和CCABG术后心肌梗死发生率的差异尤统计学意义(OR=0.80,95%CI=0.54～1.20,P=0.28).结论 依据现有的随机对照试验进行Meta分析结果 显示,OPCAB和CCABG术后心肌梗死发生率的差异无统计学意义.