Ambulatory rounds: a venue for evidence-based medicine.

OBJECTIVE: The format of inpatient morning reports and ward rounds is infrequently applied in ambulatory medical education. Published reports, however, suggest that this format provides for learner-centered, case-based discussions rather than topic-based lectures in the ambulatory setting.(1) We developed an ambulatory morning report with the specific objective of enhancing evidence-based medical inquiry among our pediatrics housestaff. DESCRIPTION: We developed a pediatric encounter form (PEF) by adapting and modifying an instrument described by Paccione et al.(2) The PEF was to be used by residents to document pertinent information and unanswered questions about patients seen during each ambulatory clinic session. Prompts were provided for documenting the patient's primary complaints, the patient's disposition, and questions that the resident needed answered. The PEF was piloted among a group of residents and faculty. The final version incorporated both resident and faculty input. Each resident was asked to complete a PEF for a maximum of two patients per clinic session. We did not direct residents as to what types of questions to formulate. All completed forms were maintained in a central folder. Next, we instituted a one-hour "Ambulatory Rounds" seminar once a week at lunch-time. During these seminars, faculty selected PEF cases from the previous week for discussion. Residents presented the cases and discussed the reasons behind the formulation of their questions. Faculty facilitated and guided residents toward resources for answering their questions. Faculty also helped residents to reformulate their questions to reflect an evidence-based medicine approach. At the end of each seminar, residents elected to research specific questions and present brief reports at the next seminar. To test the hypothesis that residents will formulate a higher proportion of evidence-based medicine (EBM) questions over time, we collected and analyzed 445 questions asked by 12 residents between July 2000 and August 2001. We categorized questions into EBM and non-EBM questions based on faculty assessment. We performed a trend analysis using chi-square to compare questions from July 2000 (as reference value) with the six-month periods of August 2000 to January 2001 and February to August 2001. By the end of the observation period, the proportion of EBM questions had significantly increased from 13% in July 2000 to 28% in the first six-month period and 59% in the second six-month period (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We describe a new application of outpatient morning reports. This format has been very well received. Housestaff gave the ambulatory rounds an average rating of 4.3 (out of 5) on a Likert scale. Our experience suggests that this format not only provides a forum for case-based learning but can be successfully used to enhance the principles of evidence-based medicine among residents.     

Interdisciplinary ambulatory education and service in primary care at the University of New Mexico.

To compete and survive in a managed care market, academic health centers must develop integrated delivery systems in general and an integrated primary care system in particular. However, the departmental-based structure at most academic health centers is ill-suited to this purpose. Service and education are usually segregated by department, and the professional activities of primary care faculty in different departments are fragmented, leaving them weakened as a political force within the institution. The University of New Mexico established a model of integrated primary care education and service by creating three interdisciplinary primary care clinics staffed by primary care residents and faculty. The clinics attracted a substantial portion of each department's faculty and residents. The clinics united primary care providers from different departments as a stronger, more unified voice in negotiating with the hospital and in fostering needed changes for primary care in the institution. Interdisciplinary teams require considerable time and labor both in planning (because of joint decision making) and in operation. Better staff structures and staff development must be learned through trial and error because there are not established benchmarks for interdisciplinary teams. Governance presents problems, primarily because loyalties to departments may supersede those to the clinic practice, and sometimes the departments' teaching priorities are challenged by clinic directors' need to ensure filling their interdisciplinary staff needs. These obstacles to collaboration can be addressed creatively, and ultimately the comprehensiveness and quality of care convinces providers and the institution.     

Faculty expectations and primary care residents' perceptions concerning residents' growth in competence at one medical school.

The authors studied at one school both the developing confidence of primary care residents and the expectations of both internal medicine and specialty faculty members regarding the abilities of the residents. From 1980 to 1988, residents in the study institution's program in internal medicine primary care completed self-assessments concerning their diagnostic and management skills in primary care and several specialties at the start of their training and at the ends of their first, second, and third years. In 1988, the authors elicited the expectations of the primary care and specialty faculties regarding the levels of competence that residents should achieve in the specialties by the end of their third year. When the faculty assessments were compared, the specialists were found to ascribe greater levels of autonomy to residents. The authors conclude that involving residents and faculty members from various disciplines in developing expectations and evaluation criteria can enhance faculty members' perceptions of residents' clinical competence and residents' achievement of it.     

The primary care specialties working together: a model of success in an academic environment.

In today's environment of decreasing resources and increasing competition among clinical delivery systems, survival and ultimate success require interdisciplinary cooperation and, if possible, integration. Academic leaders at the University of California, Irvine (UCI), have developed a collaborative model in which faculty in family medicine, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics cooperate extensively in education, research, and patient care. Generalist faculty jointly administer and teach both a four-year "doctoring" curriculum for medical students and an array of integrated curricula for primary care residents, including a communication skills course. Several primary faculty jointly developed a collaborative unit for health policy and research, now an active locus for multidisciplinary research. Other faculty worked together to develop a primary care medical group that serves as a model for interdisciplinary practice at UCI. Recently, the university recruited an associate dean for primary care who leads the new UCI Primary Care Coalition, reflecting and promoting this interspecialty cooperation. This coalition does not represent a step toward a generic primary care specialty; UCI's generalist disciplines have preserved their individual identities and structures. Yet interdisciplinary collaboration has allowed primary care faculty to share educational resources, a research infrastructure, and clinical systems, thus avoiding duplicative use of valuable resources while maximizing collective negotiating abilities and mutual success.     

Teaching the teachers: helping faculty in a family practice residency improve their informatics skills.

Faculty members in family practice residencies are increasingly being asked to help residents develop skills in the use of informatics and evidence-based medicine (EBM). In order to do this successfully the teachers themselves must be skilled in the use of these tools. Recognizing the need for such training, the Maine Medical Center Family Practice Residency Program designed a faculty development project to increase knowledge and skills in the use of information technology. This project, which was carried out in 1999-2001, utilized a multifaceted approach that included improving the residency's technology infrastructure, conducting two instructional workshops, and offering EBM mentoring for preceptors. Faculty members also designed and carried out independent informatics projects. Pre- and post-project assessments of faculty members demonstrated a significant improvement in computer and EBM skills, and informal feedback from residents indicates that these skills have been successfully applied to the faculty members' teaching of residents and their practice of family medicine. This project had a positive impact on the faculty members in the residency program, increasing both their ability to employ information technology in individual and group teaching sessions and their use of EBM in clinical practice. Also, the culture within the residency program has been changed to one of utilizing computers and the Internet as principal resources for up-to-date information.     

A consortium-based research education program for residents.

With growing pressures to consolidate and reorganize health care delivery systems, graduate medical education (GME) consortia can draw faculty from affiliated members to assemble educational programs. The authors report on consortium-based research education seminars of a quality that many residency programs would be unable to develop and support on their own. Drawing a diverse faculty from consortium members and area universities, the OHEP Center for Medical Education's annual Research Workshop Series focuses on the design of research projects; data analysis and hypothesis testing; and written and oral presentation of scientific research. Each spring, OHEP sponsors a research forum in which the best research projects from consortium members are presented by the resident-researchers, who compete for recognition and prize money. Further, of the 128 presentations made thus far at the annual OHEP Research Forum, 25% were subsequently published. The consortium's research education program has been well received by residents, is cost-effective, and is an integral component of the research curricula of many area residency programs. Including research training in GME provides residents an opportunity to become more competitive for fellowship, faculty, and leadership positions.     

A pilot survey study to define quality in residency education.

PURPOSE: To begin to define indicators of quality in internal medicine residency training. METHOD: In 1995, through a modified Delphi process, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine's Research Committee developed a questionnaire containing 44 items (34 process and ten outcome indicators). The survey was mailed to all 418 internal medicine program directors and a convenience sample of medical residents. RESULTS: Responding at a rate of 78% (326), program directors rated several indicators as important. These included such faculty characteristics as stability, completeness, supervision, clinical skills, and teaching commitment; institutional support; amount of resident evaluation and feedback; encouragement of lifelong learning; and ability to meet its program goals. There was strong agreement between faculty and residents (r = 0.91). Items rated less important included graduates' selecting academic or generalist careers, residents' caring for elective cardiac catheterization patients, resident community service, training minorities and women, and faculty research. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the diversity of opinion of what defines quality in residency education and the emphasis placed on process rather than outcome indicators. To be valid, future endeavors must include all those with a stake in graduate medical education, including accrediting bodies, future employers, and patients.     

Are residents more comfortable than faculty members when addressing sociocultural diversity in medicine?

PURPOSE: Sociocultural medicine is a growing curricular area in medical education. Because faculty members and residents will teach these curricula and model these skills in patient care, it is important to assess their attitudes toward diversity. This study examined faculty members' and residents' attitudes toward sociocultural issues in medicine. METHOD: In November 2000, 198 physicians from the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Michigan Medical School completed a questionnaire on demographics and sociocultural attitudes in medicine while they attended a department-wide retreat on cultural competency. A factor analysis of the sociocultural attitudes measure yielded five dimensions accounting for 70% of the variance. These factors included sexual orientation, diversity in professional functions, discussing race/ethnicity in teaching forums, clinical skills, and alternative medicine. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between faculty members and residents for sexual orientation issues (t = 2.76, p <.01) and alternative medicine (t = 2.84, p <.01), with residents endorsing greater comfort in these areas of patient care. When controlling for demographic/background variables, group differences disappeared. Past exposure to multiculturalism emerged as a significant predictor for both sociocultural attitude dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggested while residents felt more comfortable than faculty members did with sexual orientation and alternative medicine issues in medicine, attitudes may have been related more to previous diversity education than to seniority of the physician. Integrating diversity education within departments and across the medical education continuum likely benefits all physicians. In the area of sociocultural medicine, both faculty members and residents can offer perspectives valuable to medical students, colleagues, and the larger medical community.     

Medical faculty development: a modern-day odyssey

Academic medical centers (AMCs) are pillars of the community; they provide health care, create jobs, educate biomedical professionals, and engage in research and innovation. To sustain their impact on human health, AMCs must improve the professional satisfaction of their faculty. Here, we describe ways to enhance recruitment, retention, creativity, and productivity of health science faculty.     

A communication assessment and skill-building exercise (CASE) for first-year residents.

OBJECTIVE: Good communication skills are essential for residents entering postgraduate education programs. However, these skills vary widely among medical school graduates. This pilot program was designed to create opportunities for (1) teaching essential interviewing and communication skills to trainees at the beginning of residency, (2) assessing resident skills and confidence with specific types of interview situations, (3) developing faculty teaching and assessment skills, (4) encouraging collegial interaction between faculty and new trainees, and (5) guiding residency curricular development. DESCRIPTION: During residency orientation, all first-year internal medicine residents (n = 26) at the University of Minnesota participated in the communication assessment and skill-building exercise (CASE). CASE consisted of four ten-minute stations in which residents demonstrated their communication skills in encounters with standardized patients (SPs) while faculty members observed for specific skills. Faculty and SPs were oriented to the educational purposes and goals of their stations, and received instructions on methods of providing feedback to residents. With each station, residents were provided one and a half minutes of direct feedback by the faculty observer and the SP. The residents were asked to deal with an angry family member, to counsel for smoking cessation, to set a patient-encounter agenda, and to deliver bad news. A resident's performance was analyzed for each station, and individual profiles were created. All residents and faculty completed evaluations of the exercise, assessing the benefits and areas for improvement. DISCUSSION: Evaluations and feedback from residents and faculty showed that most of our objectives were accomplished. Residents reported learning important skills, receiving valuable feedback, and increasing their confidence in dealing with certain types of stressful communication situations in residency. The activity was also perceived as an excellent way to meet and interact with faculty. Evaluators found the experience rewarding, an effective method for assessing and teaching clinical skills, a faculty development experience for themselves in learning about structured practical skills exercises, and a good way to meet new interns. The residency program director found individual resident performance profiles valuable for identifying learning issues and for guiding curricular development. Time constraints were the most frequently cited area for improvement. The exercise became feasible by collaborating with the medical school Office of Education-Educational Development and Research, whose mission is to collaborate with faculty across the continuum of medical education to improve the quality of instruction and evaluation. The residency program saved considerable time, effort, and expense by using portions of the medical school's existing student skills-assessment programs and by using chief residents and faculty as evaluators. We plan to use CASE next year with a wider variety of physician-patient scenarios for interns, and to expand the program to include beginning second- and third-year residents. Also, since this type of exercise creates powerful feedback and assessment opportunities for instructors and course directors, and because feedback was so favorable from evaluators, we will encourage participation in CASE as part of our faculty educational development program.     

An initiative in mentoring to promote residents' and faculty members' careers.

Internal medicine trainees and faculty recognize the value of effective mentoring to help meet the personal and professional needs of residents. However, the paradigm of the mentor-trainee relationship is seriously threatened by increased clinical, research, and administrative demands on both faculty and housestaff. Moreover, the current criteria for promotion in most teaching hospitals emphasize scholarship, rather than citizenship, so activities such as mentoring devolve to a lower priority. In 2000, the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women's/Faulkner Hospital initiated a program to improve the effectiveness of housestaff mentoring and recognize faculty contributions to resident career development. The authors report the feedback received from a survey of the 2002-03 medical housestaff (74% response rate) and describe their experiences with the initiation of this program. Over 90% of the housestaff respondents thought it important that the Department assigns an individual faculty mentor. In practice, time-consuming professional responsibilities made meetings difficult, but most pairs supplemented their interactions with e-mail. Discussions primarily focused on career advice and support. Housestaff thought mentors were helpful and available when needed. The department has established new metrics for recognizing faculty mentoring and now publicly rewards mentoring excellence. Of note, unassigned mentoring has increased since the initiation of this program. The authors conclude that the formal mentoring program has ensured that all trainees are provided with a mentor, which has facilitated faculty-housestaff interactions and increased recognition of faculty contributions to mentoring.     

Professionalism in medical education: an institutional challenge.

Despite considerable attention to professionalism in medical education nationwide, the majority of attention has focused on training medical students, and less on residents and faculty. Curricular formats are often didactic, removed from the clinical setting, and frequently focus on abstract concepts. As a result of a recent curricular innovation at the University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) in which role-model faculty work with medical students in teaching and modeling clinical skills and professionalism, a new professionalism curriculum was developed for preclinical medical students. Through student feedback, that curriculum has changed over time, and has become more focused on the clinical encounter. This new and evolving curriculum has raised awareness of the existence of an "ecology of professionalism." In this ecological model, changes in the understanding of and attention to professionalism at one institutional level lead to changes at other levels. At the UWSOM, heightened attention to professionalism at the medical student level led to awareness of the need for increased attention to teaching and modeling professionalism among faculty, residents, and staff. This new understanding of professionalism as an institutional responsibility has helped UWSOM teachers and administrators recognize and promote mechanisms that create a "safe" environment for fostering professionalism. In such an institutional culture, students, residents, faculty, staff, and the institution itself are all held accountable for professional behavior, and improvement must be addressed at all levels.     

Views of managed care--a survey of students, residents, faculty, and deans at medical schools in the United States

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Views of managed care among academic physicians and medical students in the United States are not well known. In 1997, we conducted a telephone survey of a national sample of medical students (506 respondents), residents (494), faculty members (728), department chairs (186), directors of residency training in internal medicine and pediatrics (143), and deans (105) at U.S. medical schools to determine their experiences in and perspectives on managed care. The overall rate of response was 80.1 percent. RESULTS: Respondents rated their attitudes toward managed care on a 0-to-10 scale, with 0 defined as "as negative as possible" and 10 as "as positive as possible." The expressed attitudes toward managed care were negative, ranging from a low mean (+/-SD) score of 3.9+/-1.7 for residents to a high of 5.0+/-1.3 for deans. When asked about specific aspects of care, fee-for-service medicine was rated better than managed care in terms of access (by 80.2 percent of respondents), minimizing ethical conflicts (74.8 percent), and the quality of the doctor-patient relationship (70.6 percent). With respect to the continuity of care, 52.0 percent of respondents preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 29.3 percent preferred managed care. For care at the end of life, 49.1 percent preferred fee-for-service medicine, and 20.5 percent preferred managed care. With respect to care for patients with chronic illness, 41.8 percent preferred fee-for-service care, and 30.8 percent preferred managed care. Faculty members, residency-training directors, and department chairs responded that managed care had reduced the time they had available for research (63.1 percent agreed) and teaching (58.9 percent) and had reduced their income (55.8 percent). Overall, 46.6 percent of faculty members, 26.7 percent of residency-training directors, and 42.7 percent of department chairs reported that the message they delivered to students about managed care was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Negative views of managed care are widespread among medical students, residents, faculty members, and medical school deans.     

Scholarship in the medical faculty from the university perspective: retaining academic values.

Academic medicine and research universities have enjoyed a close relationship that has strengthened both, spawning an era of discovery and scholarship in medicine that has earned the U.S. academic medical enterprise a high level of public trust and a deserved leadership position in the world. However, changes in the financing of medical care and in the organization of health care delivery have dramatically affected the medical school-university partnership. The growing emphasis on delivery of clinical services and the concomitant decrease in time for tenured and clinician-educator faculty to teach and do scholarly work jeopardizes both the potential for continued discovery and the education of the next generation of medical scholars. The background of the medical school-university relationship and the factors leading to the development of clinician-educator faculty tracks are reviewed, and recent trends that impact faculty scholarship are discussed. Both tenure-track and clinician-educator medical faculty, as members of the broader university community, should expect from their university colleagues a continued demand for scholarship and educational activity that reflects the underlying philosophy of the parent university. As a corollary, the university, through its medical school, must provide these faculty the time and the financial support necessary to fulfill their academic mission. The size of the clinician-educator faculty should be determined by the academic needs of the medical school rather than by the service demands of its associated health care delivery system. To accomplish this, academic medical centers will have to develop cadres of associated or clinical faculty whose primary focus is on the practice of medicine.     

Perceptions of pediatric chief residents on minority house staff recruitment and retention in large pediatric residency programs

This study examined methods of recruiting and retaining minority house staff at US residency training programs. A 28-item questionnaire was mailed to pediatric chief residents at 78 US training programs with more than 35 residents. The response rate was 74%. Programs were characterized by patient populations served, number of ethnic/racial minority house staff and faculty, and the presence of minority house staff support systems within the institution. In this largely urban sample, minority recruitment and retention was reported as an explicit priority by 40% of pediatric chief residents. The majority (71%) reported that their house staff recruitment committees had no explicitly defined recruitment goals regarding minority house staff. Seventy-seven percent reported that within their departments, recruitment efforts toward minorities were no different than for nonminorities. Overall, few minority house staff and minority faculty were identified in the responding institutions. The most frequently reported intra-institutional support systems for minority house staff included individual pairing with faculty advisors from the same minority group (29%), an affirmative-action office located at the institution (8%), and the existence of a minority faculty support group (4%). These results indicate that pediatric chief residents may not be fully aware of the specific challenges related to the recruitment and retention of minority physicians, and most house staff recruitment committees do not have explicit goals in this regard.     

Bridging postdoctoral training and a faculty position: initial outcomes of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards in the Biomedical Siences.

PURPOSE: To describe the experiences of recipients of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund's Career Awards in the Biomedical Sciences Program (CABS) and highlight selected outcomes of the award's first set of graduates. METHOD: Since 1999, all active CABS recipients have been surveyed with the goal of assessing the program's implementation and the career progress of award recipients. Data were collected on multiple variables that are indicative of establishing an independent research career (e.g., time spent on research, external grant support, and scholarly publications), along with the views of individuals about the program and how the award had affected their careers. RESULTS: As evidenced by current employment and research funding, 77% of 1995-1999 grantees had been successful in securing tenure-track faculty positions in research-intensive institutions. Of those with faculty appointments, 78% had built research programs that attracted external support. In addition, 95% credited the award with facilitating their searches for faculty jobs, 70% believed that it had shortened the time required to obtain such positions, and 82% cited the award as enhancing their ability to attract research funds. They also perceived the award as allowing them to pursue research ideas that might have been considered as risky or premature by more traditional research sponsors. CONCLUSION: The CABS program has helped participants to launch careers as active and independent investigators. Grantees also credit it with allowing them to pursue research ideas that might otherwise have been considered impractical to support.     

Initial assessment of fine-needle aspiration specimens by telepathology: validation for use in pathology resident-faculty consultations

Telepathology is useful when distance is an obstacle to timely diagnosis. Performance of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) at locations distant from cytopathologists can limit timely assessment of adequacy and preliminary diagnosis. We evaluated a telepathology system for consultation between residents and faculty for assessment of FNA specimen adequacy and preliminary diagnosis using 100 consecutive cases. We compared findings with the original assessment of adequacy, preliminary interpretation, and final diagnosis. Two residents initially screened 50 cases, and images were then transmitted to cytopathologists, who communicated by telephone. We found 97% diagnostic concordance and 99% accuracy. The screening time ranged from 41 seconds to 30:19 minutes (mean, 6:35 minutes). The viewing time ranged from 10 seconds to 12:50 minutes (mean, 3:52 minutes). Our telepathology system is efficient and accurate for the initial assessment and preliminary diagnosis of FNA specimens, but we recommend its use by more senior and experienced trainees.