Body Mass Index and Survival in Men and Women Aged 70 to 75

OBJECTIVES: To examine in an older population all‐cause and cause‐specific mortality associated with underweight (body mass index (BMI)<18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), and obesity (BMI≥30.0). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The Health in Men Study and the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women's Health. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 70 to 75, 4,677 men and 4,563 women recruited in 1996 and followed for up to 10 years. MEASUReMENTS: Relative risk of all‐cause mortality and cause‐specific (cardiovascular disease, cancer, and chronic respiratory disease) mortality. RESULTS: Mortality risk was lowest for overweight participants. The risk of death for overweight participants was 13% less than for normal‐weight participants (hazard ratio (HR)=0.87, 95% CI=0.78–0.94). The risk of death was similar for obese and normal‐weight participants (HR=0.98, 95% CI=0.85–1.11). Being sedentary doubled the mortality risk for women across all levels of BMI (HR=2.08, 95% CI=1.79–2.41) but resulted in only a 28% greater risk for men (HR=1.28 (95% CI=1.14–1.44). CONCLUSION: These results lend further credence to claims that the BMI thresholds for overweight and obese are overly restrictive for older people. Overweight older people are not at greater mortality risk than those who are normal weight. Being sedentary was associated with a greater risk of mortality in women than in men.     

Body mass index, prognosis and mode of death in chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial

AIMS: To assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI), mortality and mode of death in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients; to define the shape of the relationship between BMI and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of 5010 patients from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial. The end-points of the study were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Mortality rate was 27.2% in underweight patients (BMI<22 kg/m2), 21.7% in normal weight patients (BMI 22-24.9 kg/m2), 17.9% in overweight patients (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and 16.5% in obese patients (BMI>30 kg/m2) (p<0.0001). The rates of non-cardiovascular death did not differ among groups. The risk of death due to progressive heart failure was 3.4-fold higher in the underweight than in the obese patients (p<0.0001). Normal weight, overweight and obese patients had lower risk of death as compared with underweight patients (p=0.019, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96; p=0.0005, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84; p=0.003, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.88, respectively) independently of symptoms, ventricular function, beta-blocker use, C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide levels. CONCLUSIONS: In CHF patients a higher BMI is associated with a better prognosis independently of other clinical variables. The relationship between mortality and BMI is monotonically decreasing.     

Body mass index is associated with prognosis in Japanese elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: an observational study from the outpatient clinic

The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the prognosis of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We aimed to examine the association of body weight with the clinical outcomes among Japanese elderly patients with a history of documented AF. This observational study of AF patients from an outpatients clinic in Nagoya University Hospital included 413 patients ≥70 years old (99 obese: BMI ≥25 kg/m²; 256 normal weight: BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m²; and 58 underweight patients: BMI <18.5 kg/m²). The mean age was 77.5 ± 5.6 years. During a mean follow-up of 19.0 months, all-cause death occurred in 23 patients (obese 1 %, normal weight 5.1 %, and underweight 16 %). The major adverse events including all-cause death, stroke or transient ischemic attack, heart failure requiring admission, and acute coronary syndrome were observed in 53 patients (obese 5.1 %, normal weight 13 %, and underweight 26 %). After adjusting for confounding factors, the underweight group had a significantly greater risk for all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) 2.91, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.12–7.60, p = 0.029], and major adverse events (HR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.25–4.78, p = 0.009) than the normal weight group. In contrast, the obese group had a better prognosis in major adverse events compared with the normal weight group (HR 0.34, 95 % CI 0.13–0.89, p = 0.029). In conclusion, lower BMI was independently associated with poor outcomes among older AF patients. The association between obesity and better prognosis in elderly AF patients was also found.     

Increased BMI correlates with higher risk of disease relapse and differentiation syndrome in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with the AIDA protocols

We investigated whether body mass index (BMI) correlates with distinct outcomes in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The study population included 144 patients with newly diagnosed and genetically confirmed APL consecutively treated at a single institution. All patients received All-trans retinoic acid and idarubicin according to the GIMEMA protocols AIDA-0493 and AIDA-2000. Outcome estimates according to the BMI were carried out together with multivariable analysis for the risk of relapse and differentiation syndrome. Fifty-four (37.5%) were under/normal weight (BMI < 25), whereas 90 (62.5%) patients were overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25). An increased BMI was associated with older age (P < .0001) and male sex (P = .02). BMI was the most powerful predictor of differentiation syndrome in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 7.24; 95% CI, 1.50-34; P = .014). After a median follow-up of 6 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 31.6% (95% CI, 22.7%-43.8%) in overweight/obese and 11.2% (95% CI, 5.3%-23.8%) in underweight/normal weight patients (P = .029). Multivariable analysis showed that BMI was an independent predictor of relapse (hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI, 1.00-5.99, in overweight/obese vs under/normal weight patients, P = .049). An increased BMI at diagnosis is associated with a higher risk of developing differentiation syndrome and disease relapse in APL patients treated with AIDA protocols.     

Body mass index and mortality in patients with severe coronary artery diseases: A cohort study from China

Background and aimsIt is still controversial whether obesity and overweight increase the risk of mortality for patients with coronary artery disease. The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in patients with triple-vessel disease (TVD).Methods and resultsFrom April 2004 to February 2011, 8943 patients with angiographically confirmed TVD were consecutively enrolled. Patients were divided into five groups according to BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), normal weight (18.5–23.9 kg/m²), overweight: (24–27.9 kg/m²), mild obesity (28–31.9 kg/m²), and severe obesity (≥32 kg/m²). The primary end point was all-cause death. Subgroup analysis was performed for treatment strategies: revascularization and medical treatment alone. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, lower risks of mortality were observed in patients with overweight (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) and mild obesity (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–1.00) compared to those with normal weight. Polynomial Cox regression suggested a U-shape association between BMI and adjusted mortality risk. In the revascularization subgroup, there was a significantly higher mortality risk in patients with severe obesity (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03–2.40) than in those with normal weight. While in the medical treatment subgroup, mortality risk decreased as BMI increased, with the lowest risk being observed in patients with severe obesity.ConclusionThere is a U-shape relationship between BMI and all-cause death in patients with TVD, with increased risks among both underweight and severely obese patients. This relationship may be influenced by treatment strategies.     

Elevated body mass index and intermediate-term clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndromes

PURPOSE: Obesity is a coronary disease risk factor, but its independent effect on clinical outcomes following acute coronary syndromes has not been quantified. We evaluated the relationship between elevated body mass index (BMI) and 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year clinical outcomes postacute coronary syndromes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using 15 071 patients (normal weight [BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)], overweight [BMI = 25-29.9 kg/m(2)], obese [BMI = 30-34.9 kg/m(2)] or very obese [BMI > or =35 kg/m(2)]) randomized from 1997-1999 in the SYMPHONY (Sibrafiban vs aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from ischemic Heart events postacute cOroNary sYndromes) and 2nd SYMPHONY trials, we evaluated the relationships between BMI and 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality and 30-day and 90-day death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Increasing BMI was associated with younger age, multiple comorbidities, and greater cardiac medication and procedure use; however, systolic function and coronary disease extent were similar for all BMI categories. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates were higher for normal-weight patients than for all other BMI groups. After multivariable adjustment, the 30-day mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were: overweight, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.94); obese, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.97); very obese, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.48 to 1.64). Adjusted hazard ratios were similar for 90-day and 1-year mortality. There were no statistically significant differences among BMI groups in 30-day and 90-day death or myocardial infarction (unadjusted or adjusted). CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese BMI classifications were associated with better intermediate-term survival after acute coronary syndromes than normal weight and very obese, but death or myocardial infarction rates were similar. Further study is required to understand the apparent association of overweight and moderate obesity with better intermediate-term outcomes.     

Impact of obesity as a mortality predictor in high-risk patients with myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure: a pooled analysis of five registries

AIMS: To explore the influence of obesity on prognosis in high-risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual data of 21 570 consecutively hospitalized patients from five Danish registries were pooled together. After a follow-up of 10.4 years, all-cause mortality using multivariate model and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Compared with normal weight [body mass index (BMI) 18.5-24.9 kg/m2], obesity class II (BMI >or= 35 kg/m2) was associated with increased risk of death in patients with MI but not HF [HR = 1.23 (1.06-1.44), P = 0.006 and HR = 1.13 (0.95-1.36), P = 0.95] (P-value for interaction = 0.004). Obesity class I (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2) was not associated with increased risk of death in MI or HF [HR = 0.99 (0.92-1.08) and 1.00 (0.90-1.11), P > 0.1]. Pre-obesity (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) was associated with decreased death risk in MI but not HF [HR = 0.91 (0.87-0.96), P = 0.0006 and 1.04 (0.97-1.12), P = 0.34] (P-value for interaction = 0.007). Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) patients were in increased death risk regardless of MI or HF [HR = 1.54 (1.35-1.75) and 1.37 (1.18-1.59), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In patients with MI but not HF, the relationship between BMI and mortality is U-shaped with highest mortality in underweight and obese class II, but lowest in the other BMI classes.     

Relation of body mass index to outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Increased body mass index (BMI), a parameter of total body fat content, is associated with an increased mortality in the general population. However, recent studies have shown a paradoxic relation between BMI and mortality in specific patient populations. This study investigated the association of BMI with long-term mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In a retrospective cohort study of 5,950 patients (mean age 61 +/- 13 years; 67% men), BMI, cardiovascular risk markers (age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypercholesterolemia, and previous coronary revascularization), and outcome were noted. The patient population was categorized as underweight, normal, overweight, and obese based on BMI according to the World Health Organization classification. Mean follow-up time was 6 +/- 2.6 years. Incidences of long-term mortality in underweight, normal, overweight, and obese were 39%, 35%, 24%, and 20%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis model, the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in underweight patients was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 3.7). Overweight and obese patients had a significantly lower mortality than patients with a normal BMI (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.7, for overweight; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.7, for obese patients). In conclusion, BMI is inversely related to long-term mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. A lower BMI was an independent predictor of long-term mortality, whereas an improved outcome was observed in overweight and obese patients.     

Bleeding and Ischemic Outcomes With Ticagrelor Monotherapy According to Body Mass Index

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of different antiplatelet regimens according to standardized body mass index (BMI) categories.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate bleeding and ischemic outcomes according to BMI in the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) trial.MethodsThe TWILIGHT trial randomized high-risk patients to ticagrelor plus aspirin or ticagrelor plus placebo at 3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. In this secondary analysis, patients were stratified by standard BMI categories, as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis (normal weight [BMI 18.5-24.99 kg/m²], overweight [BMI 25-29.99 kg/m²], and obese [BMI ≥30 kg/m²]) and by median BMI, as prespecified in the protocol.ResultsAmong 7,038 patients randomized and with available BMI, 1,807 (25.7%) were normal weight, 2,927 (41.6%) were overweight, and 2,304 (32.7%) were obese. In normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients, ticagrelor monotherapy, compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, reduced the primary endpoint of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (normal weight: HR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.32-0.73]; overweight: HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.41-0.78]; obese: HR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.44-0.91]; P for interaction = 0.627), without any increase in the composite ischemic endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (normal weight: HR: 1.36 [95% CI: 0.84-2.19]; overweight: HR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.63-1.35]; obese: HR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.56-1.25]; P for interaction = 0.290). These findings were consistent with the prespecified analysis by median BMI.ConclusionsAmong high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor monotherapy, compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, reduced bleeding events without any increase in ischemic risk across different BMI categories.     

Impact of body mass index on in-hospital outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (report from the New York State Angioplasty Registry)

Although obesity traditionally has been considered a risk factor for coronary revascularization, recent data from registry studies have shown a possible protective effect of obesity on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Using data from the New York State Angioplasty database over a 4-year period, we analyzed 95,435 consecutive patients who underwent PCI. Classification of body mass index (BMI) was: underweight (<18.5 kg/m(2)), healthy weight (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), moderate obesity (class I) (30 to 34.9 kg/m(2)), severe obesity (class II) (35 to 39.9 kg/m(2)), and very severe obesity (class III) (>40 kg/m(2)). In-hospital postprocedural mortality and complications were compared among these groups. Compared with healthy weight patients, patient with class I or II obesity had lower in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (combined death, myocardial infarction, and emergency surgery), whereas patients at the extremes of BMI (underweight and class III obese patients) had significantly higher mortality and MACE rates. Adjusted hazards ratios for in-hospital mortality according to BMI were: underweight (2.69), healthy weight (1.0), overweight (0.90), class I obese (0.74), class II obese (0.67), and class III obese (1.63). Patients at the extremes of BMI (<18.5 and >40 kg/m(2)) were at increased risk of MACEs, including mortality after PCI, whereas patients who were moderately to severely obese (BMIs 30 to 40 kg/m(2)) were at lower risk than healthy weight patients.     

Effect of body mass index on early outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify the effect of body mass index (BMI) on early clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). BACKGROUND: Obesity is considered a risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery, although existing evidence is contradictory. METHODS: A concurrent cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing CABG from April 1996 to September 2001 was carried out. Main outcomes were early death; perioperative myocardial infarction; infective, respiratory, renal, and neurological complications; transfusion; duration of ventilation, intensive care unit, and hospital stay. Multivariable analyses compared the risk of outcomes between five different BMI groups after adjusting for case-mix. RESULTS: Out of 4,372 patients, 3.0% were underweight (BMI <20 kg/m(2)), 26.7% had a normal weight (BMI >or=20 and <25 kg/m(2)), 49.7% were overweight (BMI >or=25 and <30 kg/m(2)), 17.1% obese (BMI >or=30 and <35 kg/m(2)) and 3.6% severely obese (BMI >or=35 kg/m(2)). Compared with the normal weight group, the overweight and obese groups included more women, diabetics, and hypertensives, but fewer patients with severe ischemic heart disease and poor ventricular function. Underweight patients were more likely than normal weight patients to die in hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 11.1), have a renal complication (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 3.7), or stay in hospital longer (>7 days) (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.5). Overweight, obese, and severely obese patients were not at higher risk of adverse outcomes than normal weight patients, and were less likely than normal weight patients to require transfusion (ORs from 0.42 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Underweight patients undergoing CABG have a higher risk of death or complications than normal weight patients. Obesity does not affect the risk of perioperative death and other adverse outcomes compared to normal weight, yet obese patients appear less likely to be selected for surgery than normal weight patients.     

Inverse relationship between body mass index and mortality in older nursing home residents: a meta‐analysis of 19,538 elderly subjects

Body mass index (BMI) and mortality in old adults from the general population have been related in a U‐shaped or J‐shaped curve. However, limited information is available for elderly nursing home populations, particularly about specific cause of death. A systematic PubMed/EMBASE/CINAHL/SCOPUS search until 31 May 2014 without language restrictions was conducted. As no published study reported mortality in standard BMI groups (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m²), the most adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) according to a pre‐defined list of covariates were obtained from authors and pooled by random‐effect model across each BMI category. Out of 342 hits, 20 studies including 19,538 older nursing home residents with 5,223 deaths during a median of 2 years of follow‐up were meta‐analysed. Compared with normal weight, all‐cause mortality HRs were 1.41 (95% CI = 1.26–1.58) for underweight, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.73–0.99) for overweight and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.57–0.96) for obesity. Underweight was a risk factor for higher mortality caused by infections (HR = 1.65 [95% CI = 1.13–2.40]). RR results corroborated primary HR results, with additionally lower infection‐related mortality in overweight and obese than in normal‐weight individuals. Like in the general population, underweight is a risk factor for mortality in old nursing home residents. However, uniquely, not only overweight but also obesity is protective, which has relevant nutritional goal implications in this population/setting.     

Association between body mass index and mortality in an 80-year-old population

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in an 80-year-old population. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Community-based. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred ninety-seven of 1,282 (54.4%) 80-year-old candidate individuals. MEASUREMENTS: The dates and causes of all deaths were followed up for 4 years. RESULTS: The relative hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were lower in overweight subjects (BMI > or= 25.0) than in underweight (BMI<18.5) or normal-weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) subjects. Similarly, the HRs for mortality due to CVD in overweight subjects were 78% less (HR=0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.06-0.77) than those in underweight subjects, and those in normal weight subjects were 78% less (HR=0.22, 95% CI=0.08-0.60) than those in underweight subjects. Mortality due to CVD was 4.6 times (HR 4.64, 95% CI=1.68-12.80) as high in underweight subjects as in normal-weight subjects, and mortality due to cancers was 88% lower (HR=0.12, 95% CI=0.02-0.78) in the overweight group than in the underweight group. There were no differences in mortality due to pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Overweight status was associated with longevity and underweight with short life, due to lower and higher mortality, respectively, from CVD and cancer.     

A retrospective analysis of associations between BMI and days spent on mechanical ventilation in a level 1 trauma facility

ObjectiveTo examine whether BMI impacts the outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients.MethodsData was collected retrospectively among patients involved in motor vehicle accidents in intensive care at a major trauma center in Atlanta, GA. Patients were categorized into five BMI groups: underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI of 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI of 25-29.9), obese (BMI of 30-39.9), and morbidly obese (BMI of >40).ResultsAmong all patients (n=2,802), 3% of patients were underweight, 34% were of normal weight, 30% were overweight, 27% were obese, and 6% were morbidly obese. The mean number of ventilator days for normal weight patients was 4.6, whereas the mean number of ventilator days for underweight and morbidly obese patients were higher (10.3 and 7.4, respectively).ConclusionsUnderweight and morbidly obese populations may require additional interventions during their ICU stays to address the challenges presented by having an unhealthy BMI.     

Influence of Obesity on Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation: Yet Another Obesity Paradox

Background

Obese patients have favorable outcomes in congestive heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and coronary artery disease. Obesity also has been linked with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation, but its influence on outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients has not been investigated. The objective of this research is to investigate the effect of obesity on outcomes in atrial fibrillation.

Methods

The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study was one of the largest multicenter trials of atrial fibrillation, with 4060 patients. Subjects were randomized to rate versus rhythm-control strategy. We performed a post hoc analysis of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute limited access dataset of atrial fibrillation patients who had body mass index (BMI) data available in the AFFIRM study. BMI data were not available on 1542 patients. Patients with BMI ≥18.5 were split into normal (18.5-25), overweight (25-30), and obese (>30) categories as per BMI (kg/m²). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used on the eligible 2492 patients. End points were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

Results

Over three fourths of all patients in our cohort were overweight or obese. There were 304 deaths (103 among normal weight, 108 among overweight, and 93 among obese) and 148 cardiovascular deaths (54 among normal weight, 41 among overweight, and 53 among obese) over a mean period of 3 years of patient follow-up. On multivariate analysis, overweight (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.84; P = .001) and obese (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93; P = .005) categories were associated with lower all-cause mortality as compared with normal weight. Overweight (HR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26-0.60; P <.001) and obese patients (HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95; P = .01) also had lower cardiovascular mortality as compared with the normal weight patients.

Conclusions

Although in prior studies, obesity has been associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation, an obesity paradox exists for outcomes in atrial fibrillation. Obese patients with atrial fibrillation appear to have better long-term outcomes than nonobese patients.     

Impact of body mass index on cardiac mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS). BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of MPS in the obese has not been evaluated. METHODS: We studied 4,720 patients with and 10,019 patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent rest Tl-201/stress Tc-99m sestamibi MPS, including 5,233 gated MPS studies and followed up (mean 2.7 to 3.2 years). Patients were categorized as normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2), or obese (BMI > or =30.0 kg/m2). RESULTS: Unadjusted annual rates of cardiac death (CD) rose versus stress MPS abnormalities in all weight groups (p < 0.001). Obese or overweight patients with or without known CAD who had normal MPS were at low CD risk (<1%/year), similar to normal weight patients. In CAD, obese and overweight patients with abnormal MPS had lower rates of CD compared with normal weight patients (p < 0.01). In patients with low ejection fraction (EF) by gated MPS, those with normal weight had highest CD rate (p = 0.001). Multivariable models revealed that BMI was not a predictor of CD in suspected CAD patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.02) but was an independent inverse predictor of CD in known CAD patients (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), especially in women, adenosine stress, low EF, or abnormal perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Normal MPS was associated with low risk of CD in patients of all weight categories. In patients with known CAD undergoing MPS, obese and overweight patients were at lower risk of CD over three years than normal weight patients.     

The “Obesity Paradox”: Does It Persist Among Israeli Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure? A Subanalysis of the Heart Failure Survey in Israel (HFSIS)

BackgroundEarlier studies among heart failure (HF) patients reported a paradox of reduced mortality rates in those with increased body mass index (BMI). Recently, however, it has been shown that obesity was not associated with better prognosis in certain groups. The aim of this study was to evaluate the “obesity paradox” among patients included in the Heart Failure Survey in Israel (HFSIS).Methods and ResultsClinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of 2,323 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute or decompensated chronic HF in 25 public Israeli hospitals between March 1 and April 30, 2003, were categorized by BMI as: normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²; n = 837), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m²; n = 877), or obese (≥30.0 kg/m²; n = 574), excluding 35 patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m². Survival over 15 months was inversely related to BMI category. Age-adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–1.14) for overweight patients and 0.70 (95% CI 0.55–0.88) for obese patients compared with normal-weight patients. After further adjustment for gender, ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, ischemic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, renal function, and medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker, spironolactone), obesity was associated with a nonsignificant HR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.59–1.05). Hypertension and dyslipidemia were also paradoxically associated with better survival in our model (HR 0.74, CI 0.59–0.92; and HR 0.77, CI 0.63–0.94; respectively; both P < .05).ConclusionsOur study falls in line with the obesity paradox observation (in obese but not overweight patients) in a large survey of HF patients, although this finding was not statistically significant on multivariate adjustment analysis.     

The association between body mass index and in-hospital outcome among patients with acute myocardial infarction—Insights from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry

BackgroundThe relationship between body mass index (BMI) and in-hospital mortality risk among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial.Methods and ResultsWe included 35,964 patients diagnosed with AMI in China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to BMI level: BMI <18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–30, and ≥30 kg/m² for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese groups, respectively. Clinical data were extracted for each patient, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between BMI level and in-hospital mortality. Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients were younger, more often current smokers, and more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Multivariable regression analysis results demonstrated that compared with normal group, underweight group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.69; p = 0.016), while overweight group (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77–0.97; p = 0.011) and obese group (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46–0.91; p = 0.013) had lower mortality. All subgroups showed a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality risk as BMI increased.ConclusionsOur study provided robust evidence supporting “obesity paradox” in a contemporary large-scale cohort of patients with AMI and demonstrated that increased BMI was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality.     

A retrospective study of maternal and neonatal outcomes in overweight and obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus

In pregnant women, obesity is a risk factor for multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, and preterm birth. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM. A retrospective study of 5010 patients with GDM in 11 provinces in China was performed in 2011. Participants were divided into three groups based on BMI as follows: a normal weight group (BMI 18.5–23.9 kg/m²), an overweight group (BMI 24–27.9 kg/m²), and an obese group (BMI ≥28.0 kg/m²). Maternal baseline characteristics and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationships between BMI and the risk of adverse outcomes. Of the 5010 GDM patients, 2879 subjects were from north China and 2131 were from south China. Women in the normal weight group gained more weight during pregnancy compared with the overweight and obese GDM patients. Women in the overweight and obese groups had increased odds of hypertension during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)?=?1.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI)?=?1.31–1.76 and AOR?=?2.12, 95 % CI?=?1.84–3.16). The AORs for macrosomia in the overweight and obese groups were 1.46 (95 % CI?=?1.16–1.69) and 1.94 (95 % CI?=?1.31–2.98), respectively. The relative risk of delivering a baby with an Apgar score <7 at 5 min was significantly higher in women who were obese (AOR?=?2.11, 95 % CI?=?1.26–2.85) before pregnancy compared with normal weight women. Compared with the normal weight subjects, the incidence of cesarean section and emergency cesarean section among overweight and obese women with GDM was significantly higher (P?<?0.001). Overall, overweight and obese women with GDM have an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including hypertension during pregnancy, macrosomic infants, infants with low Apgar scores, and the need for an emergency cesarean section. More attention should be paid to GDM women who are obese because they are at risk for multiple adverse outcomes.     

Effects of Body Mass Index on Clinical Outcomes in Female Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives

This study sought to investigate the effect of different body mass index (BMI) categories on clinical outcomes in female patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stents.