Rapid serial enzyme measurements in evaluation of patients with suspected myocardial infarction

Because clinical and laboratory criteria cannot accurately establish the presence or absence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at the time of initial presentation, this diagnosis is not confirmed in the majority of patients admitted to coronary care units. To study the effectiveness of serial changes in enzyme activity in specimens taken at presentation and 8 hours later in establishing the likelihood of AMI, the results in 1,214 patients with acute cardiac symptoms of less than 24 hours' duration were retrospectively evaluated. In 1,007 patients with initially normal creatine kinase (CK), an increase in CK (positive delta-CK) occurred in 98% of patients with AMI and 16% of patients without AMI. In 196 patients with elevated total CK, a low ratio of CK to aspartate aminotransferase was found in 98% of patients with AMI and 33% of patients without AMI. These 2 enzyme ratios had a sensitivity greater than 90% in patients with typical and atypical histories. The overall predictive value of serial enzyme measurements for AMI was 53%, compared with 18% in patients selected for admission. These results suggest that serial enzyme measurements could be used in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected AMI, and have the potential to reduce the number of patients admitted to coronary care units who do not have AMI.     

Alcance das Metas de Colesterol LDL após Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio: Dados Reais do Sistema Público de Saúde da Cidade de Curitiba

BackgroundReduction of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels is the cornerstone in risk reduction, but many high-risk patients are not achieving the recommended lipid goals, even in high-income countries.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether patients seen in the city of Curitiba public health system are reaching LDL-c goals after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI).MethodsThis retrospective cohort explored the data of patients admitted with AMI between 2008 and 2015 in public hospitals from the city of Curitiba. In order to evaluate the attainment of the LDL-c target, we have used the last value registered in the database for each patient up to 2016. For those who had at least one LDL-c registered in the year before AMI, percentage of reduction was calculated. The level of significance adopted for statistical analysis was p<0.05.ResultsOf 7,066 patients admitted for AMI, 1,451 were followed up in an out-patient setting and had at least one evaluation of LDL-c. Mean age was 60.8±11.4 years and 35.8%, 35.2%, 21.5%, and 7.4% of patients had LDL-c levels ≥100, 70–99, 50–69 and <50 mg/dL, respectively. Of these, 377 patients also had at least one LDL-c evaluation before the AMI. Mean LDL-c concentrations were 128.0 and 92.2 mg/dL before and after AMI, with a mean reduction of 24.3% (35.7 mg/dL). LDL-c levels were reduced by more than 50% in only 18.3% of the cases.ConclusionIn the city of Curitiba public health system patients, after myocardial infarction, are not achieving adequate LDL-c levels after AMI.     

Angina intensity is not different in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may have diminished pain or a higher frequency of asymptomatic infarctions. This appears to be a common clinical perception. METHODS: Data from two registries of AMI patients presenting in hospital (MITRA PLUS with 18786 patients; North German Registry, NGR, 1042 patients with detailed symptom interviews) were analyzed concerning symptoms of acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and without diabetes (non-DM). RESULTS: DM patients were significantly older and more often female than non-DM. There were no differences in the frequency of pre-infarction angina between DM and non-DM (Mitra Plus). In NGR, severe angina during AMI occurred in 49.8% of DM and 46.3% of non-DM (n. s.). No chest pain was reported in 16.9% of DM and 15.0% of non-DM (n. s.). Extra-thoracic pain, dizziness, nausea, sweating, palpitations, radiation of angina and localization of radiating pain was not different between DM and non-DM patients. Severe dyspnea occurred in 29.5% of DM and 19.5% of non-DM patients (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from a higher frequency of severe dyspnea in diabetics, there appears to be no difference in the clinical symptoms of AMI patients with and without diabetes mellitus. AMI with little or no angina was also frequently found in non-diabetics. In the hospital, diabetics with suspected AMI do not appear to need a special judgement of symptoms. This could accelerate access of diabetics to standard therapeutic procedures.     

Diagnostic potential of chest pain characteristics in coronary care

Abstract. Objectives . To characterize and quantitate the experience of presenting chest pain in coronary care patients in terms of intensity, quality, localization and extension of pain. Design . Localization of presenting chest pain at a body figure and estimation of intensity according to the Borg CR-10 scale of five qualities related to pain: (i) aching, (ii) burning, pricking, (iii) pressing, throbbing, (iv) dyspnoea, suffocation and (v) anxiety were done within 24 h from onset of symptoms. Setting . Coronary care unit (CCU). Subjects . Eighty consecutive patients of which 40 suffered from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Results . The AMI and non-AMI groups did not differ with regard to (i) the intensity of chest pain being mainly of moderate degree and (ii) the mean number of qualities of the presenting chest pain that were between 3 and 4. Patients with AMI reported extension of chest pain over a wider body area than patients in the non-AMI group (P < 0.0001). A second type of chest pain in addition to the major type of chest pain was reported by only 25% of the patients with AMI compared to 68% in the non-AMI group (P < 0.0001). Conclusions . Intensity, quality and localization of presenting acute chest pain in patients admitted to the CCU do not differentiate between patients with or without AMI. Extension of pain over a major part of the chest-related body surface and the absence of secondary pain appear to identify at least half of the patients with ongoing AMI.     

Why do acute myocardial infarction patients not call an ambulance? An interview with patients presenting to hospital with acute myocardial infarction symptoms

BACKGROUND: Studies from overseas indicate that patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) symptoms often fail to use the emergency services as recommended, thereby depriving themselves from life-saving treatment in case of cardiac arrest and delaying the time to myocardial reperfusion in the presence of a coronary occlusion. AIMS: To compare patients brought in by ambulance to those not brought in by ambulance and to question why some patients do not use the emergency services when presenting to hospital with AMI symptoms. METHODS: Prospective interview and follow up of consecutive patients presenting with AMI symptoms to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in a metropolitan area within a 1-month period. RESULTS: Of the 215 patients presenting to the emergency department, 113 (53%) arrived by private transportation. Sixty (53%) of these felt their symptoms did not warrant calling the ambulance, 17 (15%) had first consulted their general practitioner. The private transport group accounted for 28% of documented AMI. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients with AMI symptoms refrain from calling the emergency services because they do not consider themselves critically ill. Education programmes appear to be warranted because more appropriate use of emergency services will save lives.     

Prognosis in suspected acute myocardial infarction in relation to delay time between onset of symptoms and arrival in hospital

During a 21-month period, the prognosis in all patients admitted to a hospital ward from the emergency room with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was prospectively recorded and related to the time between onset of symptoms and arrival in hospital. They were classified as early arrivers (less than or equal to 2 h), intermediate arrivers (2-8 h) and late arrivers (greater than 8 h). Among patients developing a confirmed AMI (n = 909) the 1-year mortality rate was 26.0% in early arrivers, 28.1% in intermediate arrivers and 32.6% in late arrivers. The corresponding figures for patients in whom AMI was ruled out (n = 2,035) were 15.2, 15.1 and 17.6%, respectively. In AMI patients, various morbidity aspects during hospitalization and 1 year of follow-up appeared mainly independent of delay time, whereas among those in whom AMI was ruled out congestive heart failure during hospitalization was most common in early arrivers. We conclude that patients with suspected AMI who do not arrive early in hospital have a high 1-year mortality rate regardless of whether they develop AMI or not. Whether their prognosis can be improved by shortening of delay time remains to be clarified.     

儿童过敏性紫癜901例临床分析

目的 探讨近年来儿童过敏性紫癜(HSP)患病率和临床表现特点的变化.方法 回顾性分析我院儿科1995年1月至2005年12月住院的901例过敏性紫癜患儿的临床资料.结果 ①1995-2005年每年HSP住院构成比依次为23/2165(1.06%)、29/2098(1.38%)、24/1973(1.22%)、39/2008(1.94%)、54/2433(2.22%)、86/2611(3.29%)、94/2724(3.45%)、99/3014(3.28%)、138/2900(4.76%)、143/3177(4.50%)、172/3500(4.91%),呈逐年明显增高趋势;②48.6%的患儿有前驱感染史,4个家庭分别有2～3个亲属先后患本病.③部分患儿非典型起病,165例(18.31%)起病时皮肤无紫癜,其中90例以消化道症状起病,63例以关节症状起病,6例以肾受累症状起病,1例中枢神经症状起病,5例其他症状起病;14例以消化道症状起病的HSP患儿经胃镜检查呈胃、十二指肠黏膜小血管炎表现而于皮肤紫癜出现前拟诊.④95例(10.5%)有皮肤、关节、消化道、肾脏以外的系统受累,其中中枢神经系统受累30例,男性生殖器受累11例,胰腺受累3例,心脏受累47例,1例肺出血.结论 HSP患病率近年来有明显升高趋势.其家族集聚发病、不典型起病表现及多系统损害尤其是脑、肺、胰腺、心脏等重要脏器的受累值得重视.胃肠镜检查可助消化道症状起病的非典型HSP的早期诊断.     

糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并急性心肌梗死14例临床分析

目的 探讨糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)合并急性心肌梗死(AMI)的发病情况及临床特点.方法 回顾性分析我院1998～2006年共14例2型糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并AMI患者的临床资料.结果 1998～2006年共检出DKA合并AMI患者14例;发病时同时诊断DKA合并AMI者11例,占79%;先出现DKA后出现AMI者3例,占21%;DKA合并AMI发病时以气促、消化道症状和糖尿病典型"三多"症状多见,伴随胸痛者只有29%;心电图表现为非ST段抬高性心肌梗死(NSTEMI)者6例,占43%;所有患者发病时心功能均明显降低,Killip分级3～4级者占71%;治疗上均按DKA和AMI原则处理,但限制补液量,14例患者中经抢救治疗后8例死亡(57%),含3例合并慢性肾衰竭尿毒症患者.结论 DKA合并AMI患者AMI多与DKA同时发生亦可后发,且AMI表现多不典型,发病时心功能差,病死率高.     

Familial rheumatoid arthritis in patients referred to rheumatology clinics of Tabriz, Iran

Background: The familial clustering of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in first and second degree relatives of patients supports the role of genetic factors. The proportion of heredity in its development is roughly 60%; however, most individuals closely related to someone with RA do not get the disease. Considering the lack of sufficient data on the familial aggregation of RA in Iran, we designed this study for clarifying the familial prevalence of RA. Objective: To determine the prevalence of RA among relatives of patients with RA and to evaluate the mean disease onset age in relatives. Methods: In a longitudinal study from July 2008 to July 2010, we followed 210 unrelated patients with RA and their first and second degree relatives (FDR+ and SDR+), by interviewing and physical examination of those with symptoms, to ascertain prevalence. Familial RA was defined by presence of at least two siblings fulfilling the 1987 ACR criteria for RA. Results: We demonstrated that 17.6% of patients have at least one affected relative. The prevalence of RA in the family of studied patients was 0.83% (42 people). Thirty‐two in FDR+ and 10 people in SDR+ (2.53% and 0.26% of all family), also 1.12% in female relatives and 0.39% in male relatives had RA. The odds ratio for FDR/SDR was 2.52. The mean age at disease onset in relatives was 42.30 ± 1.51 years in FDR+ and 34.40 ± 2.10 years in the SDR+ group (0.03). Conclusion: The risk of RA is greatest in FDR+ and is likely to be due to a combination of inherited and environmental factors.     

Dysautonomia and ventricular dysfunction in the indeterminate form of Chagas disease

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand the trajectory of prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Japanese health care system, which offers patients a choice between seeking treatment in a neighborhood clinic/small hospital (clinic group) or a large hospital with comprehensive cardiac services, including a cardiac catheterization laboratory (hospital group). METHODS: In this cross sectional study, 155 consecutive patients admitted with AMI to one of 5 urban hospitals in Japan were interviewed within 7 days after admission. RESULTS: The median total prehospital delay time in the clinic group (n=84) was significantly longer than the hospital group (n=71) (6 h and 48 min vs 2 h and 9 min, p<.001). Patients with severe chest pain were significantly less likely to seek treatment at a clinic/small hospital than at a large hospital compared to patients with mild or moderate symptoms (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.97). Patients who did not interpret their symptoms as cardiac in origin were significantly more likely to seek treatment at a clinic/small hospital than at a large hospital compared to patients who interpreted their symptoms as cardiac in origin (OR 3.32, 95% CI: 1.56, 7.10). After controlling for demographic and medical history, patients in the clinic group were 3.69 times (95% CI: 1.28, 10.66) less likely to receive any reperfusion therapy compared to patients in the hospital group. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the need for public education in Japan that focuses on the appropriate response to AMI symptoms. Moreover, regional AMI networks need to be instituted to provide for early transfer for PCI from clinic/small hospitals to tertiary centers.     

The prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System

BACKGROUND: Most studies of the epidemiology and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have focused on patients who experienced onset of their symptoms in the community and then presented to the hospital. There are, however, patients whose symptoms of AMI begin after hospitalization for other medical conditions. The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of in-hospital AMI in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and to compare baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes according to whether individuals presented with AMI or had an in-hospital AMI. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 7054 veterans who were hospitalized for AMI in 127 VHA medical centers between July 2003 and August 2004. The main outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Key covariates included age, body mass index, admission systolic blood pressure, heart rate, previous use of lipid-lowering drugs, elevated admission troponin value, prolonged and/or atypical chest pain on admission, and ST-segment elevation on the initial electrocardiogram. RESULTS: There were 792 patients (11.2%) who had AMI while hospitalized for other medical conditions. These patients differed substantially from those who presented to the hospital with AMI. The odds of 30-day mortality were greater in the in-hospital group (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-4.3; P<.001) and remained higher after statistical adjustment (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.4; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Although most attention has been paid to patients with AMI admitted via the community emergency medical system or through the emergency department, AMI occurring during hospitalization for other medical problems is an important clinical problem.     

The recognition of acute coronary ischemia in the outpatient setting

Background The missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction has been studied in the Emergency Department, but few studies have investigated how often coronary ischemia is correctly identified in the outpatient setting. Methods This was a single center retrospective observational study of patients with Health Alliance Plan medical insurance hospitalized at a US tertiary center with acute myocardial infarction in 2004. Outpatient encounters in the 30 days preceding acute myocardial infarction were reviewed by two independent cardiologists for presenting symptoms and diagnostic decision-making in order to classify patient presentations as acute coronary ischemia, stable angina or neither. Results There were 331 patients with acute myocardial infarction, including 190 (57%) with a primary diagnosis of AMI and evaluated by a physician in the preceding 30 days. This group included 68 patients with 95 documented outpatient encounters by a primary care physician, cardiologist, or other internal medicine specialist which formed the final study population. Mean interval between these encounters and AMI was 17 ± 11 days. Of these patients, 7 (10%) had symptoms of acute coronary ischemia, 5 (7%) had stable angina symptoms, and 56 (83%) had no symptoms of coronary ischemia at their outpatient encounters. Of the 7 patients with acute coronary ischemic symptoms, 5 were correctly identified and 2 were misidentified. Conclusion A majority of patients with subsequent AMI visit an outpatient provider in the month preceding AMI. However, few present with symptoms of coronary ischemia in the outpatient setting (10%) and these symptoms are not always identified as such.     

Black-white differences in severity of coronary artery disease among individuals with acute coronary syndromes

Objective: To determine whether the extent of coronary obstructive disease is similar among black and white patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Design: Retrospective chart review.
Patients: We used administrative discharge data to identify white and black male patients, 30 years of age or older, who were discharged between October 1, 1989 and September 30, 1995 from 1 of 6 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina (UnA) and who underwent coronary angiography during the admission. We excluded patients if they did not meet standard clinical criteria for AMI or UnA or if they had had prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting.
Measurements and Main Results: Physician reviewers classified the degree of coronary obstruction from blinded coronary angiography reports. Obstruction was considered significant if there was at least 50% obstruction of the left main coronary artery, or if there was 70% obstruction in 1 of the 3 major epicardial vessels or their main branches. Of the 628 eligible patients, 300 (48%) had AMI. Among patients with AMI, blacks were more likely than whites to have no significant coronary obstructions (28/145, or 19%, vs 10/155 or 7%, P = .001). Similarly, among patients with UnA, 33% (56/168) of blacks but just 17% (27/160) of whites had no significant stenoses ( P = .012). There were no racial differences in severity of coronary disease among veterans with at least 1 significant obstruction. Racial differences in coronary obstructions remained after correcting for coronary disease risk factors and characteristics of the AMI.
Conclusions: Black veterans who present with acute coronary insufficiency are less likely than whites to have significant coronary obstruction. Current understanding of coronary disease does not provide an explanation for these differences.     

Black-white differences in severity of coronary artery disease among individuals with acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the extent of coronary obstructive disease is similar among black and white patients with acute coronary syndromes. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PATIENTS: We used administrative discharge data to identify white and black male patients, 30 years of age or older, who were discharged between October 1, 1989 and September 30, 1995 from 1 of 6 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina (UnA) and who underwent coronary angiography during the admission. We excluded patients if they did not meet standard clinical criteria for AMI or UnA or if they had had prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physician reviewers classified the degree of coronary obstruction from blinded coronary angiography reports. Obstruction was considered significant if there was at least 50% obstruction of the left main coronary artery, or if there was 70% obstruction in 1 of the 3 major epicardial vessels or their main branches. Of the 628 eligible patients, 300 (48%) had AMI. Among patients with AMI, blacks were more likely than whites to have no significant coronary obstructions (28/145, or 19%, vs 10/155 or 7%, P =.001). Similarly, among patients with UnA, 33% (56/168) of blacks but just 17% (27/160) of whites had no significant stenoses (P =.012). There were no racial differences in severity of coronary disease among veterans with at least 1 significant obstruction. Racial differences in coronary obstructions remained after correcting for coronary disease risk factors and characteristics of the AMI. CONCLUSIONS: Black veterans who present with acute coronary insufficiency are less likely than whites to have significant coronary obstruction. Current understanding of coronary disease does not provide an explanation for these differences.     

Predictive Value of Prodromal Symptoms in Myocardial Infarction

ABSTRACT. Prodromal symptoms within four weeks prior to an acute event leading to coronary care unit admission have been studied in 276 consecutive patients interviewed within 24 hours after arrival at hospital. Coronary heart disease (CHD) was diagnosed in 237 patients, 140 of whom did develop acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Group I) and 97 who did not (Group 2). Of the remainder, 15 had miscellaneous heart diseases (Group 3) and 24 no heart disease (Group 4). Unstable angina pectoris was equally frequent among CHD patients with and without development of AMI and was related to a higher hospital mortality in AMI patients. Less specific symptoms occurred with equal frequency in the four groups. Patients who developed AMI were not possible to identify by prodromal symptoms.     

Prognosis for patients with initially suspected acute myocardial infarction in relation to presence of chest pain.

In all 4,232 patients admitted to a single hospital during a 21-month period due to initially suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the prognosis and risk factor pattern were related to whether patients had chest pain or not. Symptoms other than chest pain that raised a suspicion of AMI were mainly acute heart failure, arrhythmia, and loss of consciousness. In 377 patients (9%) symptoms other than chest pain raised an initial suspicion of AMI. These patients developed a confirmed infarction during the first three days in hospital with a similar frequency (22%) as compared with patients having chest pain (22%). However, patients with "other symptoms" had a one-year mortality of 28% versus 15% for chest pain patients (p less than 0.001). Patients with "other symptoms" more often died in association with ventricular fibrillation and less often in association with cardiogenic shock as compared with chest pain patients. Among the 921 patients who developed early AMI, 64 (7%) had symptoms other than chest pain. They had a one-year mortality of 48% versus 27% for chest pain patients (p less than 0.001). We conclude that in a nonselected group of patients hospitalized due to suspected AMI, those with symptoms other than chest pain have a one-year mortality, which is nearly twice that of patients with chest pain.     

Thrombolysis therapy and coronary angiography in acute myocardial infarct in the Augsburg region: results of the Augsburger Heart infarct register 1985-1987

In the years 1985-87, the Augsburg Coronary Event Register registered 1333 hospitalized patients who had survived an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for at least 24 h. In 953 patients, data on time intervals in the prehospital phase were documented in addition to the medical records data in a standardized nurse interview. The time from onset of AMI until the patient called for medical attention constituted most of the prehospital time delay. Of the interviewed male and female patients, 67% were hospitalized within 6 h (= time limit). The differences, both in the number of thrombolyses and the number of coronary angiographies performed in men and in women are statistically significant. Thrombolysis was performed in 27% of the male and 12% of the female AMI patients who were admitted to hospital within the time limit. The rate of thrombolytic therapy decreased with increasing age and was less in patients with recurrent AMI (men: 20%, women: 0%) than in patients with first AMI (men: 29%, women: 15%). There was some time-of-day variation in the percentage of thrombolytic therapy which may be attributable to hospital organization. From 1985 to 1987, the coronary angiography rates performed in the medical center doubled, independent of the thrombolytic therapy rates. In this time, angiography rates in thrombolyzed patients increased from 49% to 75%, and from 14% to 31% in patients without thrombolysis. The 28-day case fatality was 4.8% in patients with thrombolysis and 13% in patients without thrombolytic therapy. Controlling for age, sex, and recurrent AMI, this difference is not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

2314例老年人有关急性心肌梗死知识现状的调查

目的调查分析北京市部分老年人有关急性心肌梗死(AMI)知识现状与心血管疾病知识的影响因素。方法采取分层后随机抽样调查2314例60岁以上老年人有关AMI的知识现状。结果68.34%的人知晓AMI的最常见症状;76.62%的人知晓至少一个次常见症状。32.62%的人知晓AMI的再灌注疗法;43.26%的人知晓硝酸甘油是AMI发作时的急救药物;42.17%的人知晓自己和80.6%的人知晓他人发作AMI时要呼叫120或999。高龄、经济收入高、有医疗保险、受教育水平高、独居和有心血管疾病经历的人具有较多有关AMI的知识。结论老年人缺乏AMI主要症状的有关知识,公共健康教育应提高老年人群有关AMI知识水平,尤其是弱势人群。     

Factors predisposing to a nonadmission of patients with acute myocardial infarction

Among patients presenting at the hospital with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), about 2-6% are mistakenly discharged by emergency physicians. The relevance of diagnostic problems in the prehospital period of an AMI is unknown. We prospectively studied 421 patients seen by a primary care physician in the prehospital period of an AMI. Using a standardized interview, data were obtained to identify factors determining nonadmission. Of 421 AMI patients, 327 (77.7%) were directly admitted to hospital after examination by the physician, whereas 94 (22.3%) were not admitted. The median prehospital delay was 240 min in admitted and 2,200 min in nonadmitted patients. Using a stepwise logistic regression model, the following factors were identified as independent contributors to nonadmission: the patient not being much affected by the symptoms (2.48; 1.40-4.39), improvement of symptoms (2.59; 1.46-4.59), the patient not thinking to suffer an AMI (2.33; 1.28-4.17) and the patient being unable to imagine having a heart disease (1.93; 1.07-3.46). CONCLUSION: Nonadmission of AMI patients by health care professionals is a common problem. Several aspects of AMI presentation including the often limited intensity of symptoms and the variability of the clinical course may have to be re-emphasized by cardiologists. Taking a very careful history and being circumspect about the patient's interpretation of symptoms still are the keys to a correct diagnosis of AMI.     

Retrospective analysis of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after the first acute myocardial infarction

We retrospectively analyzed survival in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) after first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The study was conducted in 5 sites in Poland and involved 521 patients who survived more than 30 days after AMI. In the 5-year period after the acute event, we investigated the following cardiovascular (CV) outcomes: death (overall mortality), next MI, stroke, hospitalization due to acute coronary symptoms (HACS), and composite outcomes (whichever occurred first). We also assessed: age, smoking habit, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosed before AMI, and gender. 269 patients (52%) suffered one of the outcomes from the composite CV endpoint. HACS was the first event in 164 cases, MI in 59, death in 32, and stroke in 14 patients. Analyzing the prevalence of individual CV events, we found: HACS in 184 patients (35%), next MI in 79 patients (15%), death in 59 patients (11%), and stroke in 30 patients (6%). Only dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, and CAD were independent risk factors with an impact on composite CV endpoint. Other analyzed risk factors like smoking and obesity did not have independent effects on the CV risk. In the retrospective analysis, we found that HACS was the most frequent CV event in individuals with type 2 DM after AMI. The CV risk in type 2 diabetics who suffered at least one myocardial infarction was further increased in those with coexisting dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension or CAD. These findings support the current guidelines which recommend aggressive management of CV risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia and CAD before a first myocardial infarction.