A rural-urban comparative study of nonphysician providers in community and migrant health centers.

This is a study of the employment of nonphysician providers--nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives--in both rural and urban Community and Migrant Health Centers and of factors associated with their employment, based on a 1991 national survey of 383 Centers. Results of the survey suggest that nonphysician providers, in particular nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives, primarily serve as physician substitutes, and are more likely to be employed by Centers that are larger and have affiliations with nonphysician provider training programs. Rural or urban location is not significantly related to the employment of nonphysician providers after controlling for center size. The fact that rural centers employ fewer nonphysician providers than urban centers can primarily be accounted for by their relatively small size, rather than a lack of interest. These findings demonstrate that the use of nonphysician providers is an important way both to achieve cost containment and improve access to primary care for those residing in medically underserved areas.     

Commentary From the Front Lines: Improving the National Health Service Corps' Use of Medical Providers

Abstract: Migrant and community health centers, funded by the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC), provide a vital service to rural communities by ensuring accessible and affordable medical care. One way the BPHC helps communities staff these centers is through the National Health Service Corps (NHSC). In this program, medical professionals receive scholarships or educational loan repayment in return for practicing in medically underserved regions where migrant and community health centers are located. Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse midwives (nonphysician providers) are a recent addition to the NHSC, and they offer the advantages of reduced cost and a strong primary care orientation. In this commentary, the authors recount their own experiences as a nonphysician provider NHSC scholarship recipient and spouse, and they identify five underlying problems with the current system, which lead to poor nonphysician provider retention. (1) Too few potential placement sites are made available from the outset. (2) NHSC placement deadlines do not allow enough time for making the best possible placement. (3) Many community health centers are not highly supportive of or invested in the program. (4) NHSC efforts to support the development of local medical providers from within underserved regions are inadequate. (5) NHSC officers working with nonphysician providers do not demonstrate a high degree of commitment to achieving an optimal provider-site match. Changes in the NHSC program based on these five problems are recommended to improve the retention of nonphysician providers in this important program.     

The Attitudes of Rural Minnesota Family Physicians Toward Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

Increased use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants has been promoted as a possible solution to the shortage of primary care providers in rural locations. If the use of nonphysician providers is to be optimized in these areas, awareness and acceptance of their capabilities by rural family physicians is essential. This study surveyed the attitudes of rural Minnesota family physicians toward the use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners. Forty-six percent of the 600 rural family physicians surveyed responded to the questionnaire. Approximately 90 percent of responding physicians indicated a high degree of confidence in the abilities of nonphysician providers in the areas of preventive and routine care; some concern was expressed about the proficiency of nonphysician providers taking call, covering the emergency room, and doing hospital rounds--activities that involve a broader base of clinical knowledge and diagnostic skills. Other concerns were an increased workload for physicians due to their assumed supervisory roles, an increase in complexity of cases seen by physicians, increased physician liability, job competition between nonphysician providers and physicians, and the lack of educational opportunities and supervisory guidelines for physicians regarding collaborative relationships. Appropriate roles for family physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants are not well-defined in the minds of respondents, and it appears future acceptance and practice patterns will depend on how these roles are established and accepted.     

Use of nonphysician health care providers for skin cancer screening in the primary care setting

BACKGROUND: Nonphysician health care providers are in an optimal position to provide cancer prevention and screening services. METHODS: We conducted a survey of primary care physicians to determine physician use and amenability to use of nonphysician health care providers to perform skin cancer screening in comparison with other cancer screening examinations. RESULTS: A total of 1,363 eligible physicians completed the survey. Of these, 631 physicians (46%) reported a nurse practitioner or physician assistant performing at least one type of cancer screening examination on their patients. Twenty-nine and 22% of all physicians reported nurse practitioners or physician assistants performing skin cancer screening, respectively. Family physicians were more likely to use nurse practitioners and physician assistants to perform these cancer screening examinations than internists (chi(2) test, P = 0.001 for each examination). Skin examinations were performed less frequently by nurse practitioners and physician assistants than all other cancer screening examinations. A total of 73-79% of family physicians and 60-70% of internists were amenable to having a nonphysician health care provider perform one or more of these examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians are currently utilizing nonphysician health care providers to perform cancer screening examinations and the majority of those surveyed are amenable to the use of these providers for such examinations. This suggests that one possible strategy for increasing skin cancer screening is through an expanded role of nonphysician health care providers.     

HMOs and Managed Care: Implications for Rural Physician Manpower Planning*

American health care is changing dramatically. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other managed care plans are central to this change. Today, the majority of Americans living in metropolitan areas receive their care from these types of plans. The goal of this article is two-fold. First, it will discuss the potential implications of HMOs and managed care for physician needs and supply in rural regions. Second, it will derive insight into alternative approaches for meeting rural health manpower needs by analyzing HMO staffing patterns. As HMOs and other managed care plans expand, rural physicians, their practices, and their patients will almost certainly be affected. As described in this paper, most of these effects are likely to be positive. The staffing patterns used by HMOs provide an interesting point of comparison for those responsible for rural health manpower planning and resource development. HMOs appear to meet the needs of their enrollees with significantly fewer providers than are available nationally or suggested by the federal standards. Moreover, HMOs make greater use of nonphysician providers such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants.     

HMOs and Managed Care: Implications for Rural Physician Manpower Planning*

ABSTRACT: American health care is changing dramatically. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other managed care plans are central to this change. Today, the majority of Americans living in metropolitan areas receive their care from these types of plans. The goal of this article is two-fold. First, it will discuss the potential implications of HMOs and managed care for physician needs and supply in rural regions. Second, it will derive insight into alternative approaches for meeting rural health manpower needs by analyzing HMO staffing patterns. As HMOs and other managed care plans expand, rural physicians, their practices, and their patients will almost certainly be affected. As described in this paper, most of these effects are likely to be positive. The staffing patterns used by HMOs provide an interesting point of comparison for those responsible for rural health manpower planning and resource development. HMOs appear to meet the needs of their enrollees with significantly fewer providers than are available nationally or suggested by the federal standards. Moreover, HMOs make greater use of nonphysician providers such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants.     

Rural and Urban Physicians' Perceptions Regarding the Role and Practice of the Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, and Certified Nurse Midwife

ABSTRACT: Context: There is a dearth of literature citing the differences in rural and urban physicians' perceptions of the role and practice of nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives (nonphysician providers). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare differences, if any, between rural and urban primary care physicians' perceptions of the role and practice of nonphysician providers. Results: Despite a 15.55% response rate using a mail-out survey in South Carolina, data from 681 rural and urban primary care physicians indicated that they perceived that nonphysician providers possess the necessary skills and knowledge to provide primay care to patients, are an asset to a physician's practice, free the physician's time to handle more critically ill patients, and increase revenue for the practice, but increase the risk of patient care mistakes and a physician's time in administrative duties. Urban physicians' mean scores were higher for perceiving that nonphysician providers are able to see as many patients in a given day as a physician but experience impediments in the delivery of patient care. Conclusions: Results will be used to clarify physicians' perceptions regarding the role and practice of nonphysician providers to reduce impediments to patient care access.     

Imbalances in the health labour force: an assessment using data from three national health facility surveys

Accurate knowledge of the characteristics of the health labour force that can affect health care production is of critical importance to health planners and policymakers. This study uses health facility survey data to examine characteristics of the primary health care labour force in Nicaragua, Tanzania and Bangladesh. The characteristics examined are those that are likely to affect service provision, including urban/rural distribution, demographic characteristics, and experience and in-service training, for three types of providers (physicians, nurses and auxiliary nurses). The profiles suggest a pattern of urban/rural imbalances in Nicaragua and Tanzania. The Bangladesh facility survey did not include hospitals, thereby making concrete conclusions on the supply and distribution of providers difficult to make. Multivariate logistic regressions are used to assess the relationship between the urban/rural placement of providers by health need, population demand and facility characteristics. Health need, as measured by child mortality rates, does not have a significant association with the placement of providers in either country, unlike population size and annual growth rates. The mean number of years providers have worked at a facility is significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of rural placement for the three types of providers in Nicaragua. The mean age and percentage of female providers at each facility has a negative association with the placement of rural providers in Tanzania. The use of health facility data to profile the health care labour force is also discussed.     

Issues Surrounding the Distribution and Utilization of Nurse Nonphysician Providers in Rural America*

The cost and quality of health care is an ever-increasing concern. Responsible people are looking for logical solutions. One solution is the increased involvement of nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives in the delivery of health care services to patients. This paper reviews the supply, education, and responsibilities of nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives, government studies of the need for nonphysician providers, the cost-effectiveness of health care delivered by nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives, and impediments to practice.     

Issues Surrounding the Distribution and Utilization of Nurse Nonphysician Providers in Rural America*

ABSTRACT: The cost and quality of health care is an ever-increasing concern. Responsible people are looking for logical solutions. One solution is the increased involvement of nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives in the delivery of health care services to patients. This paper reviews the supply, education, and responsibilities of nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives, government studies of the need for nonphysician providers, the cost-effectiveness of health care delivered by nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives, and impediments to practice.     

Primary Health Care in Community Health Centers and Comparison with Office-Based Practice

We examine the roles of nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and nurse midwives (CNMs) in community health centers (CHCs). We also compare primary care physicians in CHCs with office-based physicians. Estimates are from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative annual survey of nonfederal, office-based patient care physicians and their visits. Analysis of primary care delivery in CHCs and office-based practices are based on 1,434 providers and their visits (n = 32,300). During 2006–2007, on average, physicians comprised 70% of CHC clinicians, with NPs (20%), PAs (9%), and CNMs (1%) making up the remainder. PAs, NPs, and CNMs provided care in almost a third of CHC primary care visits; 87% of visits to these CHC providers were independent of physicians. Types of patients seen by clinicians suggest a division of labor in caring for CHC patients. NPs and PAs were more likely than physicians to report providing health education services. There were no other differences among services examined. Office-based physicians were less likely to work alongside PAs/NPs/CNMs than CHC physicians. CHC staffing is contingent on a variety of providers. CHC staffing patterns may serve as models of primary care staffing for office practices as demand for primary care services nationwide increases.     

Selected Comparisons and Implications of a National Rural and Urban Survey on Health Care Access, Demographics, and Policy Issues

As the national health debate evolved over the past two years, a need to better understand the differential constraints of rural health delivery and popular attitudes toward policy initiatives became apparent. Selected 1994 and 1995 results of two national surveys designed to compare rural and urban household responses are reported. The average distance those living in rural households must travel to access medical providers and emergency care is nearly double that of urban household residents. Rural household resident responses show a higher level of acceptance of nonphysician health care providers such as physicians assistants and registered nurses. Means testing of Medicare programs and use of special indicators for providing more Medicaid funds to states with medically underserved and sparsely populated areas are examples of two policy initiatives that receive favorable responses from both urban and rural household residents, but would disproportionately benefit rural areas.     

Satisfaction of physician assistants and other nonphysician providers in a managed care setting.

Health maintenance organizations have employed physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other nonphysician providers for decades, yet there is little information on how satisfied these providers are with this form of practice. This paper examines how physician assistants evaluate their experience practicing in a large group model health maintenance organization and compares their attitudes and satisfaction levels with those of other nonphysician providers-nurse practitioners, optometrists, mental health therapists, and chemical dependency counselors. The data source is a 1992 survey of 5,000 nonphysician employees of a health maintenance organization. The survey instrument was a self-administrated questionnaire that included both structured and open-ended questions. The response rate averaged 88 percent for physician assistants and the other non-physician providers. Physician assistants expressed the most satisfaction with the amount of responsibility, support from coworkers, job security, working hours, supervision, and task variety. They were less satisfied with workload, control over the pace of work, and opportunities for advancement. Most physician assistants were also satisfied with pay and fringe benefits. Compared with other nonphysician providers, chemical dependency counselors expressed the highest levels of satisfaction across the various dimensions of work and optometrists the lowest. Nurse practitioners, chemical dependency counselors, and mental health professionals also tended to be satisfied with most aspects of practice in this setting. In a number of instances, they were more satisfied than the physician assistants. The findings are consistent with other studies that found health maintenance organizations to be favorable practice settings for physician assistants. The limits of physician assistant involvement and their role satisfaction and efficient use in HMOs are more likely to relate to physician attitudes and acceptance than to lack of support by coworkers and other attributes of the work environment.     

Supply Dynamics of the Mental Health Workforce: Implications for Health Policy

The U.S. mental health workforce is varied and flexible. The strong growth in supply of nonphysician mental health professionals, ranging from psychologists to "midlevel" professionals like social workers and nurse specialists, helps to offset the dwindling numbers of medical graduates entering the field of psychiatry. Primary care physicians often see patients who have some form of mental illness, which they are not always trained to recognize and treat. The data on the supply of several specialists—psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and clinical social workers—indicate that the distribution of mental health professionals varies widely by state. The composition, supply, and distribution of workers in this field also affect the care of vulnerable populations. Broader policy questions, including the lack of parity between mental and physical health insurance coverage and barriers to entry by nonphysician professions, may limit the cost-effective expansion of this diverse and dynamic workforce.     

Rural Health Care Providers in the United States

One of the most recalcitrant problems of the rural health landscape is the uneven distribution and relative shortage of medical care providers. Despite considerable efforts by federal and state governments over the past three decades to address these problems, rural provider distribution and shortage issues have persisted. The purpose of this article is to identify the challenges for rural health research and policy regarding health provider supply in the first decade of the 21st century. While the emphasis in this article is on physicians, workforce concerns pertaining to nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants are briefly described. Physician supply, geographic and specialty distribution, age, gender, quality of care, recruitment and retention, training, productivity and income, reimbursement aid managed care, federal and state ameliorative programs, safety net, and telehealth are discussed. Also highlighted are issues concerning rural health care workforce research, methods, and data as well as a series of policy-relevant questions. Solutions to rural health personnel problems can only be successfully addressed through multifaceted approaches. No vision of the future of rural health can come to fruition if it does not promote stable, rewarding, and fulfilling professional and personal lives for rural health care providers.     

北京市农村社区卫生服务中心基本公共卫生服务人力和成本现状调查

目的：了解北京市农村地区社区卫生服务中心的基本公共卫生服务人力资源和服务成本情况,为推进基本公共卫生服务均等化提供政策依据。方法：自行设计调查问卷和调查表,选择北京市昌平区、通州区、怀柔区和密云县作为调查地区。根据经济发展水平高、中、低,以整群抽样法抽取12个社区卫生服务中心、108位基本公共卫生服务人员进行调查。结果：在基本公共卫生服务人员中,年轻女性、防保人员和低职称人员占的比例较大;农村地区为预防接种和健康教育等项目分配的人员较多,为妇女保健和生殖健康等项目分配的人员较少;设置健康教育专栏、现场疫点处理等项目的单位成本较高;近郊地区为每个项目分配的工作人员数大多高于远郊地区,而每个项目的单位成本则大多低于远郊地区。结论：北京市农村地区基本公共卫生服务队伍的人力资源建设有待加强;各项基本公共卫生服务所需的成本差异较大,应结合实际需求情况和资源现状进行政策和财政上的调整。     

Service Use of Rural and Urban Medicaid Beneficiaries Suffering From Depression: The Role of Supply

Despite the prevalence and consequence of depression in rural areas, the literature on treating depression in rural areas is relatively scarce and inconclusive. The use of mental health services by rural people suffering from depression and the role that supply may play in explaining these differences are not well understood. Understanding these issues for rural Medicaid beneficiaries is important as Medicaid managed carefor physical and behavioral health care is expanded to rural areas. This study compares the mental health service use of rural and urban Medicaid beneficiaries, ages 18 to 64, in Maine suffering from depression and examines what influence mental health and primary care supply have in explaining observed differences. Two models are used to estimate the use of ambulatory mental health services: (1) a logit likelihood estimate of whether a beneficiary uses any outpatient mental health services for depression; (2) an ordinary least squares regression estimating the number of annualized ambulatory mental health care visits among users. Rural beneficiaries suffering from depression have lower utilization than urban beneficiaries. Rural and urban Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)--and Supplemental Security Income (SSI)--beneficiaries suffering from depression rely more on mental health than on general health care providers to receive ambulatory mental health care. Rural beneficiaries (AFDC and SSI) rely relatively more on general health care providers than urban beneficiaries. Multivariate analysis suggests that mental health supply and patient-level factors, but not primary care supply, account for utilization differences. This article describes the need to better understand factors limiting participation of primary care providers and to study the role of supply across multiple states.