Lifelong learning skills: how experienced are students when they enter medical school?

Widening participation initiatives together with changes in school curricula in England may broaden the range of lifelong learning skills experience of new undergraduates. This project examines the experience levels of current students, as a comparative baseline. First-year medical students completed a questionnaire on arrival, investigating their practice of 31 skills during the previous two years. Responses show that most students have regularly practised transferable skills. However, significant numbers report little experience, particularly in IT skills such as email, using the Internet, spreadsheets and databases. Some remain unfamiliar with word processing. Library research, essay writing and oral presentation are also rarely practised by substantial numbers. One-third of students lack experience of evaluating their own strengths and weaknesses. Current students already show diversity of experience in skills on arrival at medical school. Changes in the near future may increase this range of experience further, and necessitate changes to undergraduate courses.     

From undergraduate medical education to pre-registration house officer year: how prepared are students?

Studies in the United Kingdom show that the first year of being a new doctor is a difficult transition from being an undergraduate medical. These doctors feel ill-prepared by their undergraduate medical student education and ill-equipped for their new role. This is a questionnaire study looking at 193 pre-registration house officers (PRHOs) and 212 consultant educational supervisors within the West Midlands Deanery in England, UK. The study asked how well prepared these new doctors were in seventeen basic subject areas (using a General Medical Council based template), and also, using the same template, how well prepared their consultant educational supervisors felt they were. Statistical testing included ranking of subject areas for each group, reliability testing and comparisons of views of house officers and consultants. Both groups ranked communication skills areas highest (best prepared) and ranked basic doctoring skills (such as prescribing, treatment, decision making and emergencies) lowest. House officers rated themselves significantly higher than did their consultant supervisors in thirteen out of the seventeen areas tested. In discussion, we ask if we have gone too far in teaching effective communication at the expense of basic doctoring skills. We also consider whether indeed young doctors have an inflated opinion of their own competencies, or are the older generation seeing the world through rose tinted spectacles?     

Small groups and problem-based learning: are we singing from the same hymn sheet?

Recently, commented that there is a need for better ways of looking at how teaching and learning work in the PBL approach before it is banished to the wilderness of other educational innovations. The premise of this paper is that better ways of looking at how PBL works are dependent on better ways of understanding PBL. The recent exchange of views in the literature about the value of the small-group learning environment in PBL suggests that there is a variety of perspectives on the role and purpose of the small group. The debaters will have difficulty settling their differences or even understanding each other's point of view if they are not 'singing from the same hymn sheet'. In pursuit of clarifying the issue and contributing to an enhanced understanding of PBL, this paper critiques published views of the small-group learning environment against a way of looking at PBL as a whole approach to learning medicine.     

Does change from a traditional to a new medical curriculum reduce negative attitudes among students? A quasi-experimental study

The authors investigated whether a new type of medical school curriculum-with problem-based learning, integrated preclinical and clinical phases, and increased levels of contact between students, patients and teachers--is associated with lower levels of students' negative attitudes towards medical training than is a traditional medical school curriculum. This association was found, and was confirmed by a comparison between students in a university that had changed from a traditional curriculum to a new curriculum. Curriculum design may explain differences in students' attitudes towards medical school.     

Which common clinical conditions should medical students be able to manage by graduation? A perspective from Australian interns

The objectives of the study were to report the development of a core curriculum that details the clinical conditions medical students should be able to manage upon graduation; and to canvass the opinion of interns (first-year postgraduate doctors) regarding their perceptions of the level of skill required to manage each condition. Literature relating to core curriculum development and training of junior medical officers was reviewed and stakeholders in the education and training of medical students and junior doctors in the state of New South Wales, Australia (intern supervisors, academics, registrars, nurses and interns) were consulted. The final curriculum spanned 106 conditions, 77 'differentiated' and 29 'undifferentiated'. Four levels of skill at which conditions should potentially be managed were also identified: 'Theoretical knowledge only'; 'Recognize symptoms and signs without supervision'; Initiate preliminary investigations, management and/or treatment without supervision'; and 'Total investigation, management and/or treatment without supervision'. The list of conditions in the curriculum was converted to a survey format and a one-in-two random sample of interns (n = 193) practising in New South Wales who graduated from the state's three medical schools were surveyed regarding the level of skill required for managing each clinical condition at graduation. A total of 51.3% of interns responded to the survey. Interns felt they should be able to initiate preliminary investigation, management and/or treatment for most conditions in the curriculum, with more than half acknowledging this level of management for 53 of the differentiated and 28 of the undifferentiated conditions. It is concluded that developing core curricula in medical education can involve multiple stakeholders, including junior doctors as the consumers of educational experiences. The data gathered may be useful to medical schools revising their curricula.     

Ward round simulation in final year medical students: Does it promote students learning?

Introduction: Ward round skills are essential for doctors in hospital settings. Literature shows medical students’ deficiencies in these skills. Simulation has been used to train these skills. However, exposing learners to simulation at an early stage may be associated with a high cognitive load and limited learning. This study aims to determine how students experience this load and its interplay with performance and which factors promote and impair learning.

Methods: Fifty-six final year medical students participated in a simulated ward round training exercise. Both students’ performance and cognitive load were measured to determine if there was any correlation and interviews were carried out to understand which factors support and impair learning.

Results: Performance scores revealed deficiencies in ward round skills. Students experienced a cognitive load that weakly correlated with performance. Qualitative findings provided important insights into simulated ward-based learning. It is clear that well-designed clinical scenarios, prioritization tasks, teamwork and feedback support students’ learning process whereas distractions impair learning.

Conclusions: WRS proved to be a good teaching method to improve clinical skills at this stage as the cognitive load is not too high to impair learning. Hence, including tasks in the simulation design can enhance the learning process.     

A transitional course from high school to medical school in a new medical curriculum in Asia: how do the students see it?

The objective of this study was to examine the students' views on a transitional course for Asian freshers in a revised medical curriculum. Data were collected through the year-end questionnaire distributed to all first-year students over three academic years from 1997 to 2000. The students considered the transitional course had encouraged them to become more active and self-directed although there were different views about its overall effectiveness. Students appeared uncertain as to the depth in which they were expected to master the subjects, thus leading them to call for more clearly stated learning objectives to help relieve the anxiety they had towards the examinations. Lectures and self-assessment exercises were seen to be providing the general guides for that.     

Empathy training in medical students – a randomized controlled trial

Aim: Empathy is a core element in the doctor–patient relationship. This study examined whether empathy in medical students can be improved by specific training.

Methods: 158 medical students were randomized into two groups. The intervention group participated in an empathy skills training with simulated patients (SPs). The control group participated in a history course. After the intervention, empathy was assessed by blinded SPs and experts in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Students also filled out a self-assessment concerning their attitude on empathy (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy Student Version, JSPE-S-S).

Results and Conclusions: Participants of the intervention group showed significantly higher levels of empathy when rated by SPs and experts than the control group. In contrast to that, no significant group differences were observed in self-rated empathy. The results underpin the value of empathy skills trainings in medical school study programs.     

What do medical students actually do on clinical rotations?

As medical schools make use of an increasing variety of clinical teaching settings, it is of interest to find that that there is very little published research that explores the actual learning activities undertaken by students in different environments. This study was designed to describe and analyse a typical week for students learning the same curricular material in one of three Australian settings: an urban tertiary teaching hospital, a remote secondary referral hospital and a rural community-based programme. Twenty-eight students completed week-long learning logs in weeks 9 and 35 of a 40-week academic year. Each student recorded his or her activity in 15-minute intervals for each week. Analysis of these data revealed that, compared with the hospital-based students, the community-based students reported greater patient contact, more time spent in clinical settings and increased time supervised by experienced clinicians. Whilst the community-based students valued their learning in clinical settings more highly than the learning they undertook at their home, the opposite was found for the tertiary hospital-based students. This study, the first to compare student activity in these three prototypical settings in the medical education literature, provides empirical evidence supporting community-based programmes as credible alternatives to traditional teaching hospital-based environments.     

Can students differentiate between PBL tutors with different tutoring deficiencies?

Many medical schools evaluate the performance of their tutors by using questionnaires. One of the aims of these evaluations is to provide tutors with diagnostic feedback on strong and weak aspects of their performance. Although everyone will agree that students are able to distinguish between poor and excellent tutors, one can question whether students are also able to differentiate between tutors with different tutoring deficiencies--tutors who perform badly on a specific key aspect of their performance. The aim of this study was to investigate to what degree students are able to differentiate between tutors with different tutoring deficiencies, how effective tutors are with different deficiencies and what kind of tips students give for improvement of a tutor's behaviour. Based on students' ratings on a tutor evaluation questionnaire, tutors were ranked in groups with different deficiencies and the average overall tutor performance score was computed for each group with a particular deficiency. In addition, students' tips for improvement given in the open-ended question at the end of the questionnaire were analysed. The results demonstrated that on average one out of five tutors showed a deficiency on only one key aspect. Tutors who did not stimulate students towards active learning were perceived as least effective. Furthermore, students' tips for improvement could be categorized into four groups: tutors who do not evaluate adequately, tutors who are too directive, tutors who are too passive and tutors who lack content knowledge. The results of this study demonstrate that students are not only able to distinguish between poor and excellent tutors, but are also able to diagnose tutors with different tutoring deficiencies and are able to provide tutors with specific feedback to improve their performance.     

What to do about medical students with unsatisfactory consultation skills?

If it is accepted that new doctors must be 'Fit to Practice' in a standard clinical house job, they should be competent in basic communication skills. Although these skills may be assessed as part of a routine OSCE-style exam in the course of the curriculum, the question is raised whether students who fail to demonstrate a minimal level of competence in this area should to be allowed to progress to the next stage of the course and eventually graduate. This paper describes our experiences with introducing 'barrier' stations in communication skills into the OSCE. Students who failed these stations, irrespective of their overall exam performance, undertook remedial studies in a compulsory two-week directed study module followed by a four-station OSCE.