Esophageal body length, lower esophageal sphincter length, position and pressure in health and disease

We compared esophageal dimensions in control subjects and patients with differing motility disorders and severities of reflux disease. Patients (1108) and healthy controls (36) underwent manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. Subjects were grouped according to pH and manometry data into seven groups. Mean (s.e.m.) esophageal body length is greatest in achalasia [22.41 (0.27) cm] and least in reflux disease [20.06 (0.13) cm, p < 0.05]. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure is greatest in achalasia [17.46 (1.06) mmHg] and least in reflux disease [6.57 (0.24) mmHg, p < 0.05]. LES length is least in achalasia patients and control subjects. The ratio of intra-abdominal to intrathoracic LES is greatest in achalasia (1.29), no reflux and normal motility group, and controls and least in reflux disease (1.04, p < 0.05). In conclusion, esophageal body length is greatest in achalasia and least in reflux disease. This is associated with caudal movement of the LES in achalasia and cranial movement of the LES in reflux disease, relative to the diaphragm.     

Pneumatic balloon dilatation in primary achalasia: the long-term follow-up results

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pneumatic dilatation is a safe and most effective treatment for achalasia. We analyzed the long-term results of pneumatic dilatation in primary achalasia by objective and subjective findings. METHODOLOGY: Pneumatic dilatation was performed in patients that were diagnosed with primary achalasia in our manometry laboratory between 1993-1999 years. We evaluated patients with clinical, radiologic, endoscopic and manometric results before treatment. Mean esophageal diameters on the level of the lower esophageal sphincter and middle esophagus were measured by barium esophagograms. The patients were clinically reevaluated after one week and barium esophagograms were repeated one month later after dilatation. Clinical examination, endoscopy and manometry were done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and repeated yearly for follow-up period. A statistical comparison of pre- and posttreatment on the frequency of dysphagia, radiological diameter of the esophagus and manometric data was performed using unpaired t tests and chi2 tests. RESULTS: Pneumatic dilatation was performed on 50 adult patients with a mean age 41.42+/-18.07 years. A single dilatation was successful in forty patients (80%) and two to three dilatations were performed in ten (20%) patients. The median number of dilatations was 1.26. In the postdilatation period, mean short-term (< 1 year) and long-term (2-7 years) clinical improvement was 82.8% and 66.85% respectively. The mean diameter of the esophagus was regressed to 26.51+/-7.69 mm from 36.66+/-11.23 mm (p<0.001) and the mean diameter of the lower esophageal sphincter was increased to 8.38+/-3.12 mm from 2.58+/-1.13 mm (p<0.001) with pneumatic dilatation. The mean pretreatment pressure of lower esophageal sphincter was 41.14+/-11.34 mmHg and these values were 18.79+/-7.85 mmHg (p<0.001), 13.18+/-9.53 mmHg (p<0.001) in the 1st, and 5th years of the posttreatment period, respectively. The mean pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was 31.78+/-8.91 mmHg in nonresponder patients during the posttreatment period; there was no significant difference prior to pneumatic dilatation (p>0.1). Surgical operation was performed on 5 patients (10%), who had no benefit from pneumatic dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatic dilatation is an effective procedure in the treatment of primary achalasia during the short- and long-term period. Treatment evaluation can possibly be made objectively with radiographic and manometric alterations of esophagus that occurred after pneumatic dilatation.     

Manometry and impedance characteristics of achalasia. Facts and myths

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is defined manometrically by an aperistaltic esophagus. Variations in the manometric findings occur in achalasia suggesting that all manometric features should not be required to diagnose achalasia. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) allows both a functional and a manometric evaluation of esophageal motility and identifies chronic fluid retention. AIM: To compare manometric and MII characteristics in patients with achalasia. METHODS: Retrospective review of 73 MII-EM tracings from patients with achalasia done in our laboratory between October 2001 and December 2004 (38 females; mean age=53.5 y). Patients with previous esophageal interventions were excluded. Manometric and MII characteristics were identified and compared during 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Patients were also divided into 2 groups: vigorous achalasia (VA) and achalasia. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the seventy-one (31%) achalasia patients had a hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) for the 71 patients with achalasia was 37.9+/-21.2 mm Hg compared with 27.3+/-9.3 mm Hg (P<0.05) in the 73 patients with normal motility. The mean LESP in patients with achalasia was 36+/-20.3 mm Hg compared with 47+/-23.2 mm Hg (P<0.05) in patients with VA. Elevated intraesophageal pressure (IEP) was noted in 45/73 (61.6%). The mean LESP in this group was 41.1+/-22.9 mm Hg compared with 32.5+/-17 mm Hg (P<0.05) with normal IEP. The mean baseline impedance for achalasia was 801+/-732 compared with 1265.2+/-829.5 Omega (P<0.05) for the VA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with achalasia have elevated IEP, elevated LES residual pressure, normal LES pressure, and low baseline impedance. All manometric features should not be required to diagnose achalasia. Patients with an elevated IEP are likely to have an elevated LES pressure and LES residual pressure. Low MII values identify chronic fluid retention and helps confirm the diagnosis.     

Predictors of response to pneumatic dilatation in achalasia cardia.

BACKGROUND: The role of esophageal laboratory testing in predicting response to balloon dilatation in patients with achalasia cardia has been evaluated in the West; data in Indian patients are scant. AIM: To study the predictors of response to pneumatic balloon dilatation in Indian patients with achalasia cardia. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with achalasia cardia who had earlier undergone esophageal manometry before balloon dilatation (Group A) were recalled for clinical evaluation. Another consecutive 25 patients with newly diagnosed achalasia (Group B) underwent esophageal manometry and isotope transit studies before and after dilatation. RESULTS: The overall symptom response to dilatation in the 50 patients at median (range) follow up of 26 (1-60) months was 64%. Pre-dilatation clinical and laboratory parameters did not predict outcome. All patients with 1-week post-dilatation lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure less than or equal to 10 mmHg and residual pressure less than 6 mmHg were asymptomatic at follow up. CONCLUSION: Post-dilatation LES basal pressure less than or equal to 10 mmHg and residual pressure less than 6 mmHg are predictors of symptom response to balloon dilatation in patients with achalasia cardia.     

Gastroesophageal reflux before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication. A prospective study using ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring

The aim of this study was to assess prevalence of GERD before and after Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication utilizing 24-h esophageal pH/manometry studies. Helicobacter pylori status was confirmed by the Campylobacter like organism test. Those testing positive underwent 24-h pH/manometry followed by HP eradication therapy and urea breath test. Patients were followed up at 6 months and then at 1 year when they underwent a repeat 24-h pH/manometry. Twenty patients, 10 with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and 10 with duodenal ulcer (DU) were enrolled, though only 10 patients attended for a repeat 24-h pH/manometry study. The patients were well matched, though patients with NUD had a significantly higher symptom score at entry compared with the DU group (8.5 vs 5.7, P < 0.05). The pH and esophageal manometry data were similar in the two groups. Overall nine patients (45%; DU = 5, NUD = 4) had evidence of GERD prior to HP eradication and it persisted one year after cure of the infection. The reflux disease occurred in the presence of normal LES pressure (mean 15.6 +/- 3.3 mmHg). New onset GERD was uncommon after cure of HP infection, occurring in only one patient with NUD. Overall HP eradication had no impact on percentage of time pH < 4 (4.69 +/- 3 vs 4.79 +/- 3), episodes > 5 min (9.8 +/- 16 vs 15.5 +/- 25.3) and Johnson DeMeester Score (16.8 +/- 7.5 vs 26.8 +/- 18). In addition successful cure of HP produced no significant changes in LES pressure (17.9 +/- 3.8 mmHg vs 19.3 +/- 4.6 mmHg), and other esophageal manometry data. Half of HP-positive patients with NUD and DU have evidence of GERD before HP eradication. This persists after successful cure of the infection. New onset GERD occurs very uncommonly one year after HP eradication.     

Characteristics of oesophageal bolus transport in patients with mild oesophagitis

OBJECTIVE: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) frequently have oesophageal motility disturbance. However, detailed data about bolus transport characteristics in these patients are still lacking. In the present study the new technology of concurrent impedance manometry was applied for characterization of oesophageal motor function in patients with mild GORD. METHODS: Oesophageal motility testing was performed in 25 patients with mild GORD (group 1) as compared to 25 healthy subjects (group 2) employing the technique of concurrent impedancometry and manometry. Oesophageal motility as well as patterns and parameters of bolus transport after the swallowing of saline or yogurt were analysed. RESULTS: According to manometry the velocity of the contraction wave was similar in both groups. Mid-distal contraction amplitude in group 1 was still in the normal range but significantly lower than in group 2 (57.4+/-4.5 mmHg vs 91.4+/-7.5 mmHg for saline, and 47+/-4.1 vs 80.7+/-9.4 mmHg for yogurt). According to impedance measurements, bolus transport was significantly slower (3.6+/-0.1 vs 4.0+/-0.1 cm/s for saline and 3.0+/-0.1 vs 3.2+/-0.1 cm/s for yogurt), and post-deglutitive impedance was significantly lower in group 1: 2110 omega+/-116 omega versus 2542 omega+/-152 omega (P<0.01) with saline and 1862 omega+/-108 omega versus 2348 omega+/-148 omega with yogurt (P<0.01). GORD patients showed several pathological bolus transport patterns, which were not observed in healthy subjects. Gastroesophageal liquid reflux was observed between the swallows. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild GORD concurrent impedancometry and manometry is sufficiently sensitive for the detection of minor oesophageal dysmotility. Several pathological features have been characterized including delayed bolus transport, impaired propulsive volume clearance, pathological transport patterns and pathological reflux patterns.     

High-resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD

AIM: High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides a spatially enhanced, dynamic representation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) high-pressure zone making it possible to isolate the crural diaphragm (CD) contraction from expiratory lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. This study compared CD function of subjects with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A total of 75 asymptomatic controls and 156 GERD patients (EGD or pH monitoring positive) underwent HRM. The EGJ axial pressure profile was analyzed over five respiratory cycles to quantify the position and contractile vigor of the CD relative to the LES. Correlations between EGJ HRM attributes and GERD status were examined. RESULTS: GERD patients had significantly greater CD-LES separation compared with either controls or EGD-/pH- patients. GERD patients also had significantly less inspiratory augmentation of EGJ pressure (EGD-/pH+, 11.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg; EGD+, 10.0 +/- 1.2 mmHg) compared with controls (16.9 +/- 1 mmHg) or EGD-/pH- patients (16.7 +/- 0.2 mmHg). Using a logistic regression model that simultaneously examined expiratory LES pressure, LES-CD separation, and inspiratory EGJ augmentation while controlling for age and BMI, only inspiratory augmentation had a significant independent association with GERD. CONCLUSIONS: HRM characterization of EGJ morphology correlates with the objective demonstration of GERD. Although both LES pressure and LES-CD separation are associated with GERD, the strongest association and the only independent predictor of GERD as a categorical outcome in a logistic regression analysis was impaired CD function as indicated by reduced inspiratory augmentation of EGJ pressure.     

Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation characteristics using a sleeve sensor in clinical manometry

Objective: We undertook this study to determine the characteristics of swallow-induced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation in the setting of clinical manometry using a standardized methodology.
Methods: We reviewed 170 manometric recordings performed using a perfused manometric assembly with a sleeve sensor and a computer polygraph. Patients were categorized as patient controls, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), or achalasia. Tracing were semiautomatically analyzed for basal LES pressure, LES pressure during deglutitive relaxation (relaxation LES pressure), duration of LES relaxation, timing of LES relaxation, and the success rate of primary peristalsis.
Results: Forty-six patient controls, 93 with GERD, five with DES, and 26 with achalasia were identified. GERD and achalasia patients had lower or higher basal LES pressures than patient controls, respectively. Compared with patient controls, achalasia patients had higher relaxation LES pressures, lower percent LES relaxation, and shorter durations of LES relaxation. The best single measure for distinguishing achalasia was the relaxation LES pressure; using the 95th percentile value of patient controls (12 mm Hg) as the upper limit of normal, its sensitivity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of achalasia were 92% and 88%, respectively. Coupled with the finding of aperistalsis, a relaxation LES pressure ≥10 mm Hg achieved 100% sensitivity and positive predictive value among these patients.
Conclusion: Sleeve sensor recording is a practical method for clinical manometry that reliably records LES relaxation characteristics and is amenable to both a standardized manometry protocol and a semiautomated analysis routine. Relaxation LES pressure has a high diagnostic value for achalasia.     

Esophageal motility differences among aged patients with achalasia: a Taiwan report

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are limited reports on esophageal motility pressures in aged patients with achalasia and these are inconclusive. The aim of the present retrospective study was to understand the changes of esophageal motility in aged achalasia patients among the Taiwan population. METHODS: Manometric studies of 49 patients with achalasia had been performed through January 1998 to June 2005. The findings of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal and residual pressures and esophageal body contraction amplitudes were calculated and compared between the older and younger patient groups at different age cut-offs. RESULTS: Higher basal LES pressure increased significantly from the cut-off age of 65 years (i.e. patients over 65 had significantly higher basal LES pressure than younger patients: 37.0 +/- 4.19 mmHg vs 30.0 +/- 1.32 mmHg, P = 0.045). With patients > or =70 years old, it was more obvious (46.0 +/- 3.7 mmHg vs 29.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg, P = 0.001). Beginning at the cut-off age of 55, the LES residual pressure was significantly higher in older patients than those who were younger (14.0 +/- 11.06 mmHg vs 11.1 +/- 0.6 mmHg, P = 0.017). LES residual pressure is more significant in the older groups. A linear correlation between age and residual LES pressures (r = 0.383) was found. No differences were found in esophageal contraction pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Older achalasia patients in Taiwan have higher basal LES pressures, with a linear correlation between age and residual LES pressures. Age has no influence on esophageal contraction pressure.     

Manometric measurement of human sphincter of Oddi length.

Length of biliary (CBD) and/or pancreatic (PD) sphincter of Oddi (SO) was measured during perendoscopic or intraoperative manometry in 21 control subjects and in 46 patients with biliary disease. When the high resting pressure (HPZ) and the phasic wave zone (PAZ) were considered, SO length was, in the control group, 9.5 +/- 0.5 mm (M +/- SE) and 9.4 +/- 0.6 mm at the level of the CBD-SO, and 7.7 +/- 0.6 mm and 6.9 +/- 0.5 mm at the level of the PD-SO. The physiological sphincter length appeared substantially shorter than the anatomical one, as reported in the literature. No significant differences were found between controls and patients with CBD stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy without manometry reduced mean sphincter length length of the sphincterotomy was tailored to the manometric findings. Surgical partial sphincterotomy reduced sphincter length by only 46.7 +/- 10.3%.     

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in idiopathic achalasia and Chagas disease-related achalasia

The most important etiologies of achalasia are idiopathic and related to Chagas' disease. The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) in idiopathic achalasia (Id Ach) is higher compared with a healthy group, but there are different reports in Chagasic achalasia (Ch Ach). We compared the LESP of patients with both forms of achalasia and a control group. The LESP of 213 achalasia patients without previous treatment and 32 healthy volunteers were assessed. In 126 patients, the etiology could be demonstrated using serologic tests (Id Ach, 94 and Ch Ach, 32). The LESP of 213 patients was 31.86+/-14.18 mmHg and in the control group was 17.92+/-7.03 mmHg (P < 0.0001). The LESP in Id Ach and Ch Ach was 33.28+/-13.63 mmHg and 23.5+/-12.09 mmHg (P < 0.0001), respectively. Only the Id Ach group achieved statistical difference in relation to the control group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the LESP of Id Ach patients was higher than in Ch Ach patients and the control group, but there was no LESP difference between the Ch Ach and control groups.     

Ⅱ型贲门失弛缓症患者食管动力学特征的高分辨率测压分析

目的探讨Ⅱ型贲门失弛缓症（AC）患者的食管动力学特征,并评估高分辨率食管测压（HRM）检测的临床应用价值。方法收集20例Ⅱ型AC患者（观察组）和15例健康志愿者（对照组）的HRM检测结果,对比分析两组食管动力学指标的差异。结果观察组患者食管体部以无传导性同步收缩波为主（88．2％,176／200）,对照组均为正常食管蠕动波。食管下括约肌静息压、4s完整松弛压力和食管上括约肌残余压观察组分别为（37．6±12．8）mmHg（1mmHg=0．133kPa）、（31．5±13．4）mmHg和（14．0±3．8）mmHg,均明显高于对照组的（23．7±5．6）mmHg（t=3．925,P=0．000）、（10．5±4．3）mmHg（t=5．835,P=0．000）和（7．9±4．5）mmHg（t=4．325,P=0．000）;食管下括约肌松弛率观察组为（23．6±19．6）％,明显低于对照组的（58．1±16．7）％（t=-5．491,P=0．000）。食管下括约肌长度和食管上括约肌静息压两组间差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论Ⅱ型AC患者以无传导性同步收缩波和4s完整松弛压力增高为HRM的特征性表现,HRM检测有助于对AC进行早期诊断、再分类及预期疗效的评估。     

High resolution manometric findings in patients with Chagas' disease esophagopathy

ObjectiveTo describe high resolution manometry features of a population of symptomatic patients with Chagas' disease esophagopathy (CDE).MethodsSixteen symptomatic dysphagic patients with CDE [mean age (54.81±13.43) years, 10 women] were included in this study. All patients underwent a high resolution manometry.ResultsMean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) extension was (3.02±1.17) cm with a mean basal pressure of (15.25±7.00) mmHg. Residual pressure was (14.31±9.19) mmHg. Aperistalsis was found in all 16 patients. Achalasia with minimal esophageal pressurization (type 1) was present in 25% of patients and achalasia with esophageal compression (type 2) in 75%, according to the Chicago Classification. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) mean basal pressure was (97.96±54.22) mmHg with a residual pressure of (12.95±6.42) mmHg.ConclusionsOur results show that LES was hypotensive or normotensive in the majority of the patients. Impaired relaxation was found in a minority of our patients. Aperistalsis was seen in 100% of patients. UES had impaired relaxation in a significant number of patients. Further clinical study is needed to investigate whether manometric features can predict outcomes following the studies of idiopathic achalasia.     

Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In small hiatal hernias, the size of the hernia is variable. Intermittent complete reduction can be observed with high-resolution manometry as a transition from a double-peak (hernia) to a single-peak (reduced) high-pressure zone. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intermittent separation of the diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) favors the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: In 16 patients with a small hiatal hernia (3 cm), prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes were detected with pH-impedance monitoring. RESULTS: The single pressure peak profile (reduced hernia) was present for 814 minutes (56.5% of total time), and the double peak profile (unreduced hernia) was present for 626 minutes (43.5% of total time). In all patients, both pressure profiles were observed. The transition rate between the 2 profiles was 7.5 +/- 0.9 per hour. More reflux occurred when the LES and diaphragm were separated versus the reduced hernia state (23.1 +/- 5.1 vs 12.2 +/- 2.4 episodes per hour, respectively; P < .05). The proportions of acidic reflux episodes during the single and double pressure peaks were similar (70% and 67%, respectively). In the two-pressure-zone state, there was an increase in all reflux mechanisms except transient LES relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a small hiatal hernia, intermittent reduction of the hernia occurs frequently. Spatial separation of the diaphragm and LES in the nonreduced state results in a 2-fold increase in acidic and weakly acidic reflux due to mechanisms other than transient LES relaxation.     

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseases and posture and time patterns

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is caused predominantly by lower esophageal sphincter insufficiency. Reports suggest that it is possible to distinguish between two main mechanisms causing reflux: low basal sphincter pressure leading to free reflux, mostly occurring at night in the supine position, and increased transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations with normal or increased resting pressure leading to reflux during the day in an upright position. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP)-- s determined by stationary pull-through manometry--was compared to profiles of acidic reflux measured by 24-h pH monitoring in 207 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease. Differences in LESP were not significant among patients with reflux predominantly during the day in an upright position and those with reflux predominantly at night in a supine position (16.1 +/- 7.4 mmHg versus 15.1 +/- 7.8 mmHg; t-test: P = 0.355). For both patterns of LESP, there was a slight negative correlation with the amount of acidic reflux (determined as a percentage of time with pH < 4). Pearson correlation coefficients were -0.196 for upright refluxers and -0.137 for bipositional/supine refluxers (P = 0.006 and P = 0.049, respectively). As there are no differences in LESP with regard to posture or time patterns of acidic reflux it seems unlikely that upright reflux is associated with increased LESP, whereas supine reflux manifests due to a hypotensive LESP. Alternatively, it may be concluded that stationary pull-through manometry is inadequate for determining the cause of gastroesophageal reflux disease and is therefore of limited use in its routine diagnosis.     

The association of gastroesophageal reflux with bronchial asthma. Can asthma also trigger reflux?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) among asthmatic patients was found to range from 34% to 89% at different locations. The aims of this study have been to determine the frequency of GER in patients with asthma in the Saudi environment, to ascertain the main mechanism whereby GER triggers asthma, and to seek any evidence whether asthma can also trigger GER. METHODOLOGY: Fifty asthmatic patients were consecutively recruited as they reported to King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, in the period from February 2000 to February 2001; their mean age +/- SD was 38.0 +/- 9.8 years. Twenty-two subjects without asthma or GER served as controls; their mean age +/- SD was 29.4 +/- 8.6. Both groups were subjected to a questionnaire, esophageal manometry, dual probe ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring, and pulmonary function tests. RESULTS: Among the asthmatic group 22 patients (44%) had GER. Accordingly, the asthmatic patients were divided into two groups: asthmatic with GER (n=22), and asthmatic without GER (n=28). Hoarseness of voice and nocturnal symptoms were found to be significant predictors for the presence of GER in asthmatics. Manometry revealed that asthmatic patients with GER had higher gastric pressure (11.4 +/- 4.0 mmHg vs. 8.4 +/- 2.8 mmHg; p=0.006) and lower resting pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (21.2 +/- 8.7 mmHg vs. 28.2 +/- 9.3 mmHg; p=0.013) when compared with controls, both factors favoring the occurrence of reflux. With regard to pH data, acid reflux occurred both at the distal and proximal esophagus but the percent total acid exposure time was about 7 times longer at the distal than at the proximal esophagus (5.80 vs. 0.9). In addition, gastric pressure was positively and significantly correlated with distal esophageal acid exposure time and the DeMeester score, negatively correlated with spirometric parameters in asthmatic patients, as well as found to be a significant predictor of the severity of asthma (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Forty-four percent of the sample of asthmatic patients reporting to KFHU had GER. Since distal esophageal total acid exposure time was nearly 7 times longer than at the proximal esophagus, the main mechanism for GER triggering asthma is the vagally mediated reflex initiated by acid in the distal esophagus. In addition, the positive correlation of increased gastric pressure with the distal esophageal acid exposure time and the DeMeester score, its negative correlation with spirometric parameters and being a significant predictor of asthma severity suggest that severe asthma may trigger or aggravate GER.     

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in normal individuals and patients with gastroesophageal reflux. A comparison between end-hole and side-hole recording techniques

The advantage of a single-lumen end-hole catheter compared with the usual composite side-hole catheter for lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry has been studied in vitro and in vivo. In the present study LES pull-through manometry was performed with a special catheter, enabling simultaneous end-hole and side-hole recording of LES pressure. Eighteen normal individuals with normal 24-h pH-monitoring (control group) and 42 reflux patients with pathologic 24-h pH-monitoring (reflux group) were studied. End-hole recorded resting sphincter pressure (RSP) in the control group was 15.4 +/- 5.0 cm H2O and in the reflux group 6.4 +/- 6.4 (p less than 0.0005). Side-hole recorded RSP (mean S1-S3) was 20.8 +/- 11.6 and 11.9 +/- 6.8, respectively (p less than 0.005). End-hole recorded total sphincter length (SL) in the control group was 34 +/- 9 mm and in the reflux group 27 +/- 12 (p less than 0.025) and abdominal sphincter length (ASL) 23 +/- 7 and 16 +/- 9, respectively (p less than 0.005). Side-hole recorded SL was 30 +/- 7 and 30 +/- 12, respectively (NS) and ASL 22 +/- 6 and 18 +/- 9 respectively (NS). After intake of 500 ml of water both LES pressure and length decreased in both groups but the separation between the groups was neither improved nor impaired. The results support the view that LES insufficiency is an important cause of gastroesophageal reflux. That LES had a lower pressure and was shorter in patients with reflux was best demonstrated by end-hole recorded pressure.     

Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: variables related to a good response

Achalasia is a motor disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The cardinal symptoms are dysphagia, food regurgitation and weight loss. The most effective treatments are pneumatic dilation (PD) of the cardia and Heller esophageal myotomy with partial fundoplication. There is still controversy regarding which treatments should be initially done. The aims of this study were to evaluate clinical response and the variables related to good results in both treatments. Ninety‐two patients with achalasia diagnosed by esophageal manometry were randomized to receive either PD or laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. After the procedure, patients were followed up clinically and submitted to esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Three months after treatment, 73% of the patients from PD group and 84% of the surgery group had good results (P = 0.19). After 2 years of follow‐up, 54% of the PD group and 60% of the surgery group (P = not significant) were symptom free. Variables related to a good response to PD were a 50% drop in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) or a LESP <10 mmHg after treatment. Patients over 40 years old with LESP ≤32 mmHg before treatment and a drop in LESP >50% after treatment significantly achieved better responses after surgical treatment when compared with PD. The reflux rate was significantly higher in the PD group (27.7%) compared with the surgery group (4.7%), P = 0.003. We concluded that surgical treatment and PD for achalasia are equally effective even after 2 years of follow‐up. The choice of treatment for achalasia should be based on the following parameters: treatment availability, rate of good results, complication rates, variables related to good responses and also the patient's wish.     

The role of transsphincteric pressure and proximal gastric volume in acid reflux before and after fundoplication

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study was conducted to explore the role of proximal gastric volume and transsphincteric pressure on acid reflux during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) both before and after laparoscopic fundoplication. METHODS: Twenty GERD patients were studied before and after fundoplication along with 20 healthy controls. High-resolution manometry and pH recording was performed for 1 hour before and 2 hours following meal ingestion (500 mL/300 kcal). Three-dimensional ultrasonographic images of the stomach were acquired before and every 15 minutes after meal ingestion. RESULTS: Postprandial proximal to total gastric volume distribution ratios were significantly larger in GERD patients before fundoplication (0.57 +/- 0.01; P < .05) and smaller following fundoplication (0.37 +/- 0.01; P < .001) compared with controls (0.46 +/- 0.01). The percentage of TLESRs associated with acid reflux did not relate to proximal gastric volume in any subject group. The transsphincteric pressure profile was different for TLESRs with and without reflux in GERD patients as well as in healthy controls. The pressure gradient across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (DeltaEGJp) was greater for TLESRs with acid reflux compared with TLESRs without acid reflux in both GERD patients (11.4 +/- 0.8 vs 8.0 +/- 0.5 mm Hg, respectively; P < .01) and controls (10.6 +/- 0.7 vs 7.1 +/- 0.8 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05). After fundoplication, DeltaEGJp during TLESRs was 7.9 +/- 0.9 mm Hg, and the transsphincteric pressure profile markedly changed. CONCLUSIONS: Although proximal gastric volume plays a key role in eliciting TLESRs, it is not related to the incidence of acid reflux during TLESRs. The transsphincteric pressure gradient is greater in TLESRs associated with acid gastroesophageal reflux.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori: lack of influence of infection on oesophageal manometric, 3-hour postprandial pHmetric and endoscopic findings

AIM: To investigate the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease according to manometric and pHmetric findings. METHOD: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with reflux symptoms and endoscopic evidence of mild oesophagitis, were recruited. Manometry and ambulatory pHmetry were performed in all patients, as well as the 3-hour postprandial pHmetry, as a more flexible and well tolerable test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between Helicobacter pylori positive and negative patients regarding age, sex ratio and endoscopic severity of oesophagitis. There was no difference in prevalence of abnormal oesophageal peristalsis between the two groups (Fisher's exact test, p=NS). Differences were also not found regarding lower oesophageal sphincter pressure between the two groups (mean PLOS 12.86+/-4.39 mmHg and 13.1+/-4.61 mmHg respectively; p=0.840). Finally, the mean values of DeMeester score were 60.38+/-48.04 and 67.64+/-51.04 respectively (p=0.576). CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori infection does not influence oesophageal peristalsis, the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and the acidity of refluxates into the oesophageal lumen, in patients with established gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (esophagitis grade A and B).