The Healthy Eating Index and coronal dental caries in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014

BackgroundThe purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine if Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) scores are associated with coronal caries and the odds of untreated coronal caries in adults 20 years and older.MethodsData on decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT), untreated coronal caries, and HEI-2015 scores were obtained from 7,751 adults who completed a dental examination and two 24-hour dietary recalls in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles 2011-2012 and 2013-2014. HEI-2015 scores were categorized into quintiles, with HEI-2015 quintile 1 scores indicating the least compliance with 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The authors used multivariable linear regression to assess associations of HEI-2015 with DMFT and logistic regression for associations with untreated coronal caries. All regression models were controlled for age, sex, race or ethnicity, current cigarette use, family income to poverty threshold ratio, last dental visit, education, and whether participants were ever told they had a heart attack.ResultsRelative to HEI-2015 quintile 1, the adjusted odds of any untreated coronal caries were quintile 5 (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.80), quintile 4 (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.84), quintile 3 (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.04), and quintile 2 (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.31). Participants who met the recommendations for the total fruits, whole fruits, greens and beans, and added sugars components of the HEI-2015 score were less likely to have untreated coronal caries than those who did not meet the recommendations. Overall, mean coronal DMFT also decreased as HEI-2015 scores increased, but trends were not consistent in all racial or ethnic groups.Conclusions and Practical ImplicationsGreater compliance with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans is associated with lower prevalence and the odds of untreated caries in adults. Dietary counseling for caries prevention by dental professionals should incorporate comprehensive dietary guidelines that are consistent with those intended for enhancing overall health and reducing the risk of developing common systemic diseases.     

The effect of diet drinks on caries among US children: Cluster analysis

BackgroundThe effect of sugared beverages on dental caries has been widely studied in dental literature. A major limitation of these studies was examining the beverages as a single source. To overcome this limitation, a few studies used cluster analysis to group people into similar beverage consumption patterns. These studies did not differentiate between sugared beverages and diet drinks. Therefore the aim of this study is to examine the effect of consuming diet drinks on dental caries among US children by using cluster analysis.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, the authors analyzed the dietary data of children aged 3 through 10 years, using 2 24-hour recall interviews in the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Cluster analysis has been used to overcome the limitations of examining the beverages as a single source. Clusters were identified based on the R² statistic and the local peak of pseudo-F statistics. Survey procedure and sample weights were used to account for the complex National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey sampling design.ResultsSix beverage consumption clusters were identified: high soda, high 100% juice, high juice drinks, high diet drinks, high milk, and high water. Regression analysis showed that the high soda cluster had a tendency to increase caries risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 3.1), while the high diet drinks cluster had neutral effect compared with the high water cluster (OR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.8).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that diet drinks have no adverse effect on teeth among US children. Additional well-designed longitudinal studies should be conducted to establish the effect of diet drinks on caries when consumed during childhood.Practical ImplicationsAlthough this study did not show an association between caries and diet drinks, dental practitioners should be cautious about recommending these drinks, as they have been linked to systemic diseases. In addition, the American Academy of Pediatrics and National Academy of Medicine do not recommend that children consume these beverages.     

Oral disorders associated with the experience of verbal bullying among Brazilian school-aged children: A case-control study

BackgroundDental features have been considered a potential target of verbal bullying (VB) among school-aged children. The authors conducted a study to investigate the association between the presence of oral disorders and the occurrence of VB among 8- through 10-year-old school-aged children.MethodsThe study included 445 school-aged children 8 through 10 years old. VB was verified by a specific validated question from the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 8-10 index. Oral disorders such as untreated caries, fluorosis, clinical consequences of untreated caries, and malocclusion were evaluated. The Pearson χ² test and bivariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 390 school-aged children completed the study. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model showed that a severe malocclusion (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 5.10), a greater maxillary misalignment (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.05 to 4.73), and the presence of a tooth with pulp exposure (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.58 to 5.45) were significantly associated with the occurrence of VB.ConclusionChildren aged 8 through 10 years with a severe malocclusion, larger maxillary misalignment, or the presence of pulp exposure had increased odds of experiencing VB compared with children without those oral health conditions.Practical ImplicationsOnce oral disorders involved in VB are identified, appropriate approaches should be used to address this issue. With this course of action, oral health care professionals may use the treatment and preventive care to eliminate potential factors for peer aggression.     

Association between vaping and untreated caries: A cross-sectional study of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2018 data

BackgroundWith the rise in the prevalence of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) and vaping products and the emergence of evidence indicating their cariogenic potential, it is essential to examine the association between vaping and untreated caries at a population level.MethodsThe authors obtained data from the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and investigated the outcome variable—untreated caries—using oral health examination data. The authors applied multiple logistic regression analyses to assess the association between untreated caries and smoking (cigarette smoking, vaping, and both) while controlling for education, race or ethnicity, income, age, sex, and time since previous dental visit.ResultsA total of 4,618 participants were included in the analyses for this cross-sectional study. Participants who currently smoked e-cigarettes were more likely to have untreated caries (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.29) than those who had never smoked, when adjusted for demographic variables. Similarly, dual smokers (e-cigarette and conventional smokers) were more likely to have untreated caries compared with nondual smokers (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.36 to 4.36).ConclusionBoth vaping and dual smoking are associated with an increased occurrence of untreated caries.Practical ImplicationsVaping status should be included as a part of health history questionnaires for patients. Dental professionals should be informed of the potential oral health implications of vaping and, in turn, impart this knowledge to patients.     

The association between vitamin D levels and caries experience in children and youth participating in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundGiven equivocal findings from existing nationally representative studies, the authors sought to determine associations between vitamin D levels and caries experience in US children using updated National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.MethodsThe authors used data from 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Vitamin D status was assessed on the basis of the sufficiency thresholds of 50 and 75 nmol/L for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) recommended by the Institute of Medicine (now National Academy of Medicine) and Endocrine Society, respectively. Caries experience was defined as the total number of decayed or filled tooth surfaces (dfs) and decayed, missing, or filled tooth surfaces (DMFS) and a binary measure of any dfs and DMFS. Associations between 25(OH)D and any or total dfs and DMFS were examined in children aged 2 through 5, 6 through 8, 9 through 11, and 12 through 18 years, using multivariable logistic and linear regression models after adjustment for covariates.ResultsChildren aged 2 through 5 years with 25(OH)D above 75 nmol/L experienced fewer total dfs (β = –1.94; 95% CI, –3.60 to –0.28) than those with 25(OH)D below 75 nmol/L. Children 6 through 8 years with 25(OH)D above 75 nmol/L had lower presence of any dfs (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.95) than those with 25(OH)D below 75 nmol/L, and those with 25(OH)D above 50 nmol/L had lower presence of any DMFS (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.79) than those with 25(OH)D below 50 nmol/L. There were no associations of 25(OH)D status with either any or total DMFS in children 12 through 18 yearsConclusionsThere were no consistent associations of 25(OH)D status with caries experience across age groups.Practical ImplicationsVitamin D status was not associated consistently with reduced caries experience.     

Disparities in dental health issues and oral health care visits in US children with tobacco smoke exposure

BackgroundThe objective of the authors was to assess the relationships between tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) and dental health and dental care visits among US children.MethodsThe authors examined 2018-2019 National Survey of Children’s Health data on TSE, dental health, and oral health care visits. Children aged 1 through 11 years (N = 32,214) were categorized into TSE groups: no home TSE (did not live with a smoker), thirdhand smoke (THS) exposure (lived with a smoker who did not smoke inside the home), or secondhand smoke (SHS) and THS exposure (lived with a smoker who smoked inside the home). The authors conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for child age, sex, race or ethnicity, prematurity, caregiver education level, family structure, and federal poverty threshold.ResultsChildren with home SHS and THS exposure were at increased odds of having frequent or chronic difficulty with 1 or more oral health problem (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.35; P = .022) and carious teeth or caries (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.65; P = .010) than those with no TSE. Compared with children aged 1 through 11 years with no TSE, children with SHS and THS exposure were 2.22 times (95% CI, 1.01 to 4.87; P = .048) more likely to have not received needed oral health care but at decreased odds of having had any kind of oral health care visit (AOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.95; P = .032), including a preventive oral health care visit (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.99; P = .047).ConclusionsTSE in children is associated with caries and inadequate oral health care visits.Practical ImplicationsThe pediatric dental visit is an opportune time to educate caregivers who smoke about dental health to improve their children’s teeth condition and increase oral health care visits.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of self-assembling peptide P11-4 on arrest,cavitation, and progression of initial caries lesions

BackgroundSimple noninvasive evidence-based interventions for caries are needed to overcome limitations in the restorative paradigm. The self-assembling peptide P₁₁-4 is a noninvasive intervention that regenerates enamel in initial caries lesions.Studies ReviewedThe authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of the P₁₁-4 products Curodont Repair (Credentis; now manufactured by vVARDIS) (CR) and Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus (Credentis; now manufactured by vVARDIS) on initial caries lesions. Primary outcomes were lesion progression after 24 months, caries arrest, and cavitation. Secondary outcomes were changes in merged International Caries Detection and Assessment System score categories, quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF; Inspektor Research System), esthetic appearance, and lesion size.ResultsSix clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Results of this review represent 2 primary and 2 secondary outcomes. When compared with parallel groups, use of CR likely results in a large increase in caries arrest (relative risk [RR], 1.82 [95% CI, 1.32 to 2.50]; 45% attributable risk [95% CI, 24% to 60%]; number needed to treat [NNT], 2.8) and likely decreases lesion size by a mean (SD) of 32% (28%). The evidence also suggests that use of CR results in a large reduction in cavitation (RR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.10 to 1.06]; NNT, 6.9) and is uncertain about lowering merged International Caries Detection and Assessment System score (RR, 3.68 [95% CI, 0.42 to 32.3]; NNT, 19). No studies used Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus. No studies reported adverse esthetic changes.Practical ImplicationsCR likely has clinically important effects on caries arrest and decreased lesion size. Two trials had nonmasked assessors, and all trials had elevated risks of bias. The authors recommend conducting longer trials. CR is a promising treatment for initial caries lesions. The protocol for this systematic review was registered a priori with PROSPERO (304794).     

Association between first oral examination characteristics and dental treatment needs in privately insured children: A claims data analysis

BackgroundEarly childhood caries (ECC) remains the most common, preventable infectious disease among children in the United States. Screening is recommended after the eruption of the first tooth, but it is unclear how the age at first dental examination is associated with eventual restorative treatment needs. The authors of this study sought to determine how provider type and age at first dental examination are associated longitudinally with caries experience among children in the United States.MethodsDeidentified claims data were included for 706,636 privately insured children aged 0 through 6 years as part of the nationwide IBM Watson Health Market Scan (2012-2017). The authors used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to describe the association between the age of first visit and restorative treatment needs.ResultsA total of 21% of this population required restorative treatment, and the average age at first dental examination was 3.6 years. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed increased hazard for restorative treatment with age at first dental visit at 3 years (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.13) and 4 years (hazard ratio, 3.99; 95% CI, 3.84 to 4.16).ConclusionThe high proportion of children requiring restorative treatment and late age at first dental screening show needed investments in educating general dentists, medical students, and pediatricians about oral health guidelines for pediatric patients.Practical ImplicationsCommunicating the importance of children establishing a dental home by age 1 year to parents and health care professionals may help reduce disease burden in children younger than 6 years.     

Update on the prevalence of untreated caries in the US adult population, 2017-2020

BackgroundUntreated caries is a prevalent disease that is associated with a substantial health and economic burden. Many past efforts have assessed the epidemiology of untreated caries, and this study provides the most up-to-date figures on the distribution and determinants of the disease in the adult US population for the period 2017 through 2020.MethodsUsing data from the 2017-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the author derived estimates for untreated caries prevalence in the adult US population. The author conducted subgroup analyses to assess how the epidemiology differed between coronal and root caries and how the disease was distributed among population subgroups.ResultsOn the basis of a weighted sample representative of 193.5 million adults, the prevalence of untreated caries was found to be 21.3%. Specific prevalence of coronal and root caries were 17.9% and 10.1%, respectively. Caries was most prevalent in those aged 30 through 39 years (25.2%) and 40 through 49 years (22.3%), men (23.5%), those of other (36.5%) or non-Hispanic Black (35.6%) race or ethnicity, those with family income to poverty ratio of 0.5 through 1.0 (46.2%) or less than 0.5 (37.3%), those with educational attainment less than high school graduation (39.6%), those who did not have health insurance (42.1%), and those who were underweight (25.1%) or obese (23.5%).ConclusionsUntreated caries is present in more than 1 in 5 adults within the US population and is disproportionately distributed among those of lower socioeconomic status.Practical ImplicationsThere is a substantial unmet health care need in the US adult population for the prevention and management of untreated caries, and public health efforts should aim particularly to address disease within those subgroups who are at a disproportionately high risk.     

Pediatric dental care use and parent- or caregiver-rated oral health among Alabama children enrolled in Medicaid

BackgroundReducing caries and improving access to dental care is a public health challenge. Understanding low use of dental care is of critical importance. This study estimated parent- or caregiver-reported prevalence and identified factors associated with children’s dental care use, including the association with children’s oral health.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis of children enrolled in Medicaid in Alabama, using data from the 2017 statewide Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Health Plan Survey, was conducted. Associations were measured using adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logit regression and generalized linear model postestimation of least-squares means.ResultsThe 6-month prevalence of children receiving dental care was 70.4%. Children aged 0 through 3 years (aPR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.91) had lower prevalence of care than other age groups. The prevalence of low-rated oral health was 9.2%. Low-rated oral health was associated with not receiving dental care (aPR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.87) and parental education of 8th grade or less (aPR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.98). Falsification tests determined that dental care use was not associated with ratings for overall health (aPR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.52) or emotional health (aPR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.33).ConclusionsIt was observed that children not receiving dental care had low-rated oral health; however, as a cross-sectional study, it was not possible to assess the temporality of this relationship.Practical ImplicationsOral health care providers should continue to recognize their role in educating parents and providing anticipatory guidance on children’s oral health.     

Emergency department visits for infectious oral conditions in Massachusetts, 2014 through 2018

BackgroundThe authors aimed to measure population-based preventable emergency department (ED) visits related to infectious oral conditions (IOCs) in Massachusetts and to examine the associated sociodemographic factors to support prevention efforts.MethodsA statewide retrospective analysis of ED visits related to IOCs in Massachusetts from 2014 through 2018 was conducted using a Center for Health Information and Analysis database. The authors described patients' characteristics, dental diagnoses frequencies, emergency severity, lengths of stay, associated treatment, and costs. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with IOC visits.ResultsIOC visits in 2014 through 2018 were 1.2% (149,777) of the total ED visits, with an estimated cost of $159.7 million. There was an annual decline in the prevalence of IOC visits from 2014 through 2018. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, odds of IOC were higher among males (adjusted odd ratio [AOR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.27), non-Hispanic Blacks compared with non-Hispanic Whites (AOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06), people residing in dental health care professional shortage areas (AOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.07), public insurance beneficiaries (AOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.87 to 1.93), or uninsured (AOR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.54 to 2.66) compared with privately insured.ConclusionsThere was an annual decline in the prevalence of IOC visits from 2014 through 2018. Higher odds of IOC visits were associated with young adults, Black patients, uninsured people, public insurance beneficiaries, and people who reside in dental health care professional shortage areas.Practical ImplicationsThe authors provided statewide data to support proposed policies to improve oral health care in Massachusetts. IOCs are mostly preventable, but well-coordinated care between medicine and dentistry is integral for prevention.     

Caries risk and social determinants of health: A big data report

BackgroundOral health is influenced by social determinants of health (SDH), predisposing people and communities to greater risk of developing caries. This study evaluated the association between caries risk in adults and SDH such as ZIP Codes, systemic diseases, payment methods, and race or ethnicity.MethodsThe BigMouth Dental Data Repository (n = 57,211) was used to extract clinical and SDH data from patients’ dental electronic health records for 2019. Caries risk categories were used as ZIP Code data was merged with the Social Deprivation Index, a composite measure of area-level deprivation based on 7 demographic characteristics collected in the American Community Survey.ResultsThe results showed that the odds of being in the high caries risk group were higher for people in the 49- to 64-year age group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.24; 95% CI, 2.08 to 2.40; P ≤ .001), men (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.25; P ≤ .001), people who had comorbidities (diabetes: aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.24; P ≤ .001; cardiovascular disease: aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.50), and people with an Social Deprivation Index score above the 75th percentile (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.21 to 2.58; P ≤ .001). In addition, Hispanic and Black people had higher odds of being at high caries risk than other races or ethnicities (Hispanic: aOR, 3.05; 95% CI, 2.32 to 4.00; Black: aOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.01).ConclusionsThis study shows the association of caries risk with higher social deprivation, reinforcing the role of structural and upstream factors in oral health. This study is unique in using recorded ZIP Code information and assessing caries risk levels for those regions.Practical ImplicationsThe physical and structural environment should be considered contributors to caries risk in people.     

Patient-reported receipt of oral cancer screenings and smoking cessation counseling from US oral health care providers: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2016

BackgroundOral health care providers are encouraged to screen for oral cancer (OC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OP) and promote smoking cessation to their patients. In this study, the authors investigated the prevalence and correlates of receiving OC and OP screening and tobacco and OC and OP counseling from oral health care providers.MethodsThe authors analyzed self-reported survey data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2016 for participants who reported a dental visit. They created different samples for each subanalysis and categorized them according to smoking status. The authors calculated weighted proportions and adjusted odds for receiving tobacco counseling and screening for OC and OP in a dental office.ResultsOverall, 25.85% of US adults 30 years or older who had ever visited an oral health care professional received OC and OP screening. Odds of receiving an OC and OP screening were lower among current cigarette smokers than among never cigarette smokers (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.74) and among non-Hispanic blacks (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.59), Mexican Americans (AOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.53), non-Hispanic Asians (AOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.35), and those of other races (AOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.65), than among non-Hispanic whites. Participants with a high school education or more had higher odds of receiving an OC and OP screening (AOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.43) and counseling for screening (AOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.51) than did those with less than a high school education. Participants with family incomes of 400% or more of the federal poverty guideline had higher odds of receiving OC and OP screening (AOR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.06 to 12.94) but lower odds of receiving tobacco counseling (AOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.82) than did participants with family incomes of less than 100% of the federal poverty guideline.ConclusionsOral health care providers underscreen for OC and OP among high-risk groups, including current cigarette smokers, minorities, and people of low socioeconomic status. The authors charge oral health care educators to include OC and OP screening and smoking cessation counseling in training and continuing education programs to increase the confidence of oral health care providers.Practical ImplicationsPotential to influence change on current pre-doctoral clinical training programs and to increase opportunities for continuing education courses that review the importance of, as well as, how to successfully complete smoking cessation counseling.     

Impact of motivational interviewing on early childhood caries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe authors aimed to assess the scientific evidence on motivational interviewing for the clinical reduction of early childhood caries compared with traditional dental health education.MethodsSearch terms were selected on the basis of Medical Subject Headings and non–Medical Subject Headings terms. The main key words were motivational interviewing, early childhood caries, and education. Potentially eligible studies involved the clinical assessment of caries rate in children whose parents or caregivers received motivational interviewing as an intervention. The authors assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. In March 2019, the authors performed an electronic database search of literature published in English within the following databases: Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase.ResultsOf 329 articles retrieved initially, 14 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and 3 articles contributed to the meta-analysis. For statistical analysis, the mean difference of continuous data was analyzed at a 95% confidence interval using the random-effects model.ConclusionsOverall, the evidence presented in this review was limited. Although the results of the meta-analysis showed that motivational interviewing is as effective as dental health education in controlling early childhood caries, we need more and better designed and reported interventions to assess its impact on early childhood caries accurately.     

Smoking-cessation advice from dental care professionals and its association with smoking status: Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018

BackgroundSmoking remains a major contributor to mortality and morbidity. Dental care professionals are positioned to help patients quit smoking. Results of clinical trials have shown the efficacy of dental care professionals’ smoking-cessation advice; however, the evidence of its effectiveness in the general population in the United States is limited. The authors examined the association between smoking-cessation advice from dental care professionals and quitting behaviors of adult smokers in the general population.MethodsThe authors used an observational study design with data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the years 2015 through 2018. The authors included 1,024 respondents 18 years and older who were current or former smokers who quit smoking within the past 12 months and reported a dental visit within the past 12 months.ResultsAmong the study sample, 44.6% received smoking-cessation advice from a dental care professional. The authors found no significant association between smoking-cessation advice and any attempt to quit smoking (as a binary outcome; adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.80; P = .677). Although respondents who received smoking-cessation advice reported 18% more quit attempts (on a continuous scale; adjusted rate ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.39, P = .05), smoking-cessation advice was not associated with smoking abstinence beyond 6 months.ConclusionsReceiving smoking-cessation advice from a dental care professional was associated with more attempts to quit smoking but not with abstinence of 6 months or longer.Practical ImplicationsAdditional efforts seem to be needed for smoking cessation in dental practices. Implementing enhanced incentive programs or promoting tobacco-use cessation certification in dental education may be an effective strategy to enhance dental professionals’ knowledge and skills in providing additional support to their patients.     

Impact of school sealant programs on oral health among youth and identification of potential barriers to implementation

BackgroundSchool sealant programs (SSPs) increase sealant prevalence among children lacking access to oral health care. SSPs, however, are substantially underused. From 2013 through 2018, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded 18 states for SSP activities in high-need schools (≥ 50% free and reduced-price meal program participation). From 2019 through 2020, the authors assessed SSPs' impact in reducing caries and how states expanded SSPs. The authors also discuss potential barriers to expansion.MethodsFor Aim 1, the authors used a published methodology and SSP baseline screening and 1-year retention data to estimate averted caries over 9 years attributable to SSPs. For Aim 2, the authors used state responses to an online survey, phone interviews, and annual administrative reports.ResultsUsing data for 62,750 children attending 18.6% of high-need schools in 16 states, the authors estimated that 7.5% of sound, unsealed molars would develop caries annually without sealants and placing 4 sealants would prevent caries in 1 molar. Fourteen states reported SSP expansion in high-need schools. The 2 most frequently reported barriers to SSP expansion were levels of funding and policies requiring dentists to be present at assessment or sealant placement.ConclusionsThe authors found that SSPs typically served children at elevated caries risk and reduced caries. In addition, the authors identified funding levels and policies governing supervision of dental hygienists as possible barriers to SSP expansion.Practical ImplicationsIncreasing SSP prevalence could reduce caries. Further research on potential barriers to SSP implementation identified in this study could provide critical information for long-term SSP sustainability.     

Association between primary headaches and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe primary objective of this systematic review was to answer the following question systematically: Is there any association between primary headaches (PHs) and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in adults?Types of Studies ReviewedThe protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The authors performed the search in 6 main databases and 3 gray literature sources. The included articles had to have adult samples. PHs must have been diagnosed using the International Classification of Headache Disorders, and TMDs must have been diagnosed using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, or International Classification of Orofacial Pain. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument tools. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software, Version 5.4. Certainty of evidence was screened according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.ResultsNine of 2,574 articles reviewed met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis and, of these, 7 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) for painful TMD and tension-type headache (OR, 1.94 [95% CI, 0.56 to 6.76] to OR, 7.61 [95% CI, 1.84 to 31.48]), migraines (OR, 4.14 [95% CI, 1.38 to 12.43] to OR, 5.44 [95% CI, 3.61 to 8.21]), and chronic headaches (OR, 40.40 [95% CI, 8.67 to 188.15] to OR, 95.93 [95% CI, 12.53 to 734.27]) were calculated. Articular TMDs without pain were evaluated in 2 articles, and both did not show positive association with tension-type headache nor migraine. Three studies were classified as moderate risk of bias and 6 as low risk of bias. The certainty of evidence varied between very low and low.Conclusions and Practical ImplicationsRecognizing the positive association between painful TMD and PHs can help dentists and physicians treat the pain and avoid it, or recommend the patient to a specialist.     

Reducing carious lesions during the first 4 years of life: An interprofessional approach

BackgroundCaries in Peruvian 0- through 3-year-olds is high. The dental profession should collaborate with nurses at mother and child health (MCH) clinics for reducing the disease. In this randomized clinical trial, the authors tested an integrated intervention program implemented by nurses and dentists.MethodsThe authors developed age-specific (0-3 years) oral health–related information and activity record cards and validated them for nurses to use after being educated about oral health issues and mouth inspection. The authors trained dentists in atraumatic restorative treatment. The active intervention group (AG) participated in the integrated intervention program, the passive intervention group (PG) received only the oral health–related information and activity record cards, and the control group (CG) received only a lecture. The examiners assessed caries status according to the Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment instrument. The authors used analysis of variance and the Tamhane method to analyze the data.ResultsThe sample consisted of 368 children with a mean age of 3.1 years. The 3-year dropout percentage was 40.5%. The prevalence of cavitated dentin carious lesions was statistically significantly lower in the AG (10.0%, confidence interval [CI] 4.1 to 19.5) than in the PG (60.5%, CI 48.6 to 71.5) and CG (63.0%, CI 50.9 to 74.0) after 3 years (P < .001). Enamel carious lesions (62.9%) were most prevalent in the AG, whereas carious lesions were most prevalent in the PG (28.9%) and CG (32.9%).ConclusionsIncorporation of specific oral health care activities into the existing MCH program, implemented by trained nurses and supported by health center dentists, reduced the burden of caries in 3-year-olds substantially.Practical ImplicationsThe oral health care professionals in Peru should collaborate with personnel of MCH clinics to curb caries in 0- through 3-year-olds.     

Preventive oral health care use for children with special health care needs aged 6 through 12 years enrolled in Medicaid: A mixed methods study

BackgroundThe authors aimed to assess preventive oral health care (POHC) use for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) aged 6 through 12 years enrolled in Medicaid and identify intervention strategies to improve oral health.MethodsIn this sequential mixed methods study, the authors analyzed 2012 Medicaid data for children aged 6 through 12 years in Washington state. They used eligibility and claims data to identify special health care needs status (independent variable) and POHC use (outcome variable). They ran modified Poisson regression models to generate prevalence rate ratios. They coded data from 21 key informant interviews deductively using content analytic techniques.ResultsOf the 208,648 children in the study, 18% were identified as CSHCN and 140,468 used POHC (67.3%). After adjusting for confounding variables, the authors found no difference in POHC use by special health care need status (prevalence rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.01; P = .91). In the qualitative analysis, the authors identified 5 themes: caries risk depends on a child’s specific health condition, caries complicates overall health, having a special need creates a bigger barrier to care, legislation alone is “not going to make much of a dent,” and improvements across all fronts are needed to promote the oral health of CSHCN in Medicaid.ConclusionsCSHCN enrolled in Medicaid are just as likely as children without special health care needs to use POHC, although barriers to oral health care access persist for CSHCN.Practical ImplicationsFuture efforts should focus on comprehensive strategies that address the varying levels of dental disease risk and difficulties accessing oral health care within the diverse group of CSHCN.