Carotid sinus hypersensitivity and syncope.

Hyperactivity of the carotid sinus reflex is common in older men. However, an unequivocal diagnosis of carotid sinus syncope is difficult to establish because the symptoms are nonspecific, and both hyperactivity of the carotid sinus reflex and syncope are common. Twenty-one men were evaluated for episodes of lightheadedness or syncope, or both, associated with a hypersensitive carotid sinus reflex. Seventeen patients had the cardioinhibitory type, two the vasodepressor type and two both the cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor types. Patients with the cardioinhibitory type benefited from the insertion of a permanent pacemaker if they had multiple episodes of syncope. A history of syncope associated with some event capable of stimulating the carotid sinus was also helpful in selecting patients for pacemaker treatment. The combination of the cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor types may be missed unless carotid sinus stimulation is repeated after the administration of atropine. The results of electrophysiologic studies in 17 patients with the cardioinhibitory type suggest that intrinsic sinus nodal dysfunction is not the major cause for asystole after carotid sinus stimulation.     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity: Beneficial effects of dual-chamber pacing

Three types of carotid sinus (CS) syndrome have been described: cardioinhibitory, vasodepressor and mixed. For the treatment of symptomatic patients with associated significant cardioinhibition, permanent ventricular demand pacing systems are often implanted. Even with this pacing modality, some patients remain symptomatic because of continued (and at times aggravated) vasodepression. This study assesses the effects of loss of atrial preloading and orthostasis after carotid massage in patients with CS hypersensitivity. Eleven patients were studied using constant intra-arterial pressure measurements during either ventricular (VVI) or atrioventricular sequential (DVI) pacing in both supine or upright positions.The measurements performed included the magnitude of decrease in arterial blood pressure (BP), the rate of decrease of BP and the percent change in BP from baseline values. After carotid massage, all 11 patients had greater hemodynamic change with the VVl than DVI pacing mode, whether in the supine or upright position. The decreases in systolic BP were: DVI (supine) 29 mm Hg, VVI (supine) 48 mm Hg, DVI (upright) 37 mm Hg, and VVI (upright) 59 mm Hg (mean group values, p <0.001). The rates of decrease of systolic BP were: DVI (supine) 2.9 mm Hg/s, VVI (supine) 5.7 mm Hg/s, DVI (upright) 4.1 mm Hg/s, and VVl (upright) 8.3 mm Hg/s (mean group values, p <0.001). VVI pacing, particularly in the upright position, resulted in a significant increase in the incidence of patient symptoms (p = 0.03). Thus, in CS hypersensitivity, VVI pacing results in significant hemodynamic deterioration compared to DVI mode. This aggravation of the vasodepressor component results in increased patient symptoms, and therefore, DVI is the optimal pacing mode.     

Pure vasodepressor carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Unusual cause of recurrent syncope

Recurrent syncope in a 53-year-old man was found to be due to vasodepressor carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Establishment of the diagnosis required monitoring of both the electrocardiographic changes and the blood pressure during carotid sinus massage. Current therapeutic approaches to patients with symptomatic vasodepressor hypersensitivity are discussed.     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in patients presenting with syncope

In 23 patients (ages 44 to 81) presenting with syncope, vertigo, or transient amnesia, carotid sinus massage produced a significant bradycardia in association with symptoms. The 10 most severely symptomatic patients were studied electrophysiologically, including measurement of intracardiac conduction times and corrected sinus node recovery times, as well as with carotid sinus massage before and after atropine. The only detectable abnormality in five of this group was asystole produced by carotid sinus massage; the other five had, in addition, evidence of either sinuatrial disease or an intracardiac conduction defect. Cardiac pacing in these 10 patients completely abolished their symptoms. In a control group of 52 asymptomatic patients (ages 36 to 87), an abnormal response to carotid sinus massage was uncommon (2%).     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in patients presenting with syncope.

In 23 patients (ages 44 to 81) presenting with syncope, vertigo, or transient amnesia, carotid sinus massage produced a significant bradycardia in association with symptoms. The 10 most severely symptomatic patients were studied electrophysiologically, including measurement of intracardiac conduction times and corrected sinus node recovery times, as well as with carotid sinus massage before and after atropine. The only detectable abnormality in five of this group was asystole produced by carotid sinus massage; the other five had, in addition, evidence of either sinuatrial disease or an intracardiac conduction defect. Cardiac pacing in these 10 patients completely abolished their symptoms. In a control group of 52 asymptomatic patients (ages 36 to 87), an abnormal response to carotid sinus massage was uncommon (2%).     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Case report and review of the literature

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is a potentially treatable cause of recurrent neurologic symptoms. Diagnosis depends upon recognizing the variable presentation of symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and noting an exaggerated cardiovascular response to carotid sinus massage associated with neurologic symptoms. Once the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity has been established, it is important to delineate the type of hypersensitivity present, because identification of the vasodepressor response has important therapeutic implications.     

Carotid sinus syncope induced by malignant tumors in the neck. Emergence of vasodepressor manifestations following pacemaker therapy

Three patients had carotid sinus syncope secondary to malignant neoplasms in the neck. Pacemaker therapy controlled the cardioinhibitory reflex with bradycardia, but the patients manifested varying episodes of hypotension due to a vasodepressor reflex that most likely resulted from persistent irritation of the carotid sinus by the tumor. These episodes seemed to be self-limiting. Surgical treatment in resistant cases is a possibility.     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in asymptomatic older persons: implications for diagnosis of syncope and falls

BACKGROUND: Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is the most commonly reported cause of falls and syncope in older persons. Recent guidelines recommend 5 to 10 seconds of carotid sinus massage in supine and upright positions with beat-to-beat monitoring. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity in (1) an unselected community sample of older people and (2) a subsample with no history of syncope, dizziness, or falls using recently standardized diagnostic criteria. METHODS: One thousand individuals older than 65 years were randomly sampled from a single general practice register; 272 participants underwent supine and upright carotid sinus massage with continuous heart rate and phasic blood pressure monitoring. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was defined as asystole of 3 seconds or greater and/or a drop in systolic blood pressure of 50 mm Hg or greater. RESULTS: Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was present in 107 individuals (39%); 24% had asystole of 3 seconds or greater during carotid sinus massage; and 16% had symptoms (including syncope) with carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Age (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.09) and male sex (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence intervals, 1.04-2.82) were the only predictors of carotid sinus hypersensitivity. In 80 previously asymptomatic individuals, carotid sinus hypersensitivity was present in 28 (35%) and accompanied by symptoms in 10. The 95th percentile for carotid sinus massage response was 7.3 seconds' asystole and a 77-mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is common in older persons, even those with no history of syncope, dizziness, or falls. The finding of a hypersensitive response should not necessarily preclude further investigation for other causes of syncope.     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Median-term development as a function of treatment and symptoms

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and natural history of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) with respect to treatment and symptoms. Between May 1976 and December 1981, 714 patients underwent carotid sinus massage (CSM) during electrophysiological investigation (271 for syncope, 163 for dizziness); 79 had a pathological response (sinus arrest for over 3 s or two successive pauses of over 2 s each). Twenty five of these patients were excluded from the study group; 23 had the sick sinus syndrome or an associated AV block, and two were lost to follow-up. The remaining 54 patients were divided into two groups: Group I, comprising 33 patients who were given no treatment, and Group II, comprising 21 patients who were treated by permanent pacing. The patients in Group I were followed up for an average of 29 +/- 16 months and those in Group II for 25 +/- 22 months. Nine of the 18 patients in Group I, hospitalised for syncope, but none of the 5 patients admitted for dizziness alone, relapsed during follow-up. Only 1 patient without syncope or dizziness at the time of investigation reported having had a syncope during follow-up. The actuarial graph of absence of syncope fell regularly in Group I (58 p. 100 at 5 years), 4 patients in Group I were then given demand pacemakers and there was no further recurrence of syncope (follow-up: 34 +/- 15 months). Only 1 patient, admitted for dizziness, out of the 21 patients in Group II (13 syncopes, 8 cases of dizziness) continued to complain of the symptoms for which he had been paced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Medium and long-term development in patients treated by ventricular pacing

The problem of pacing patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) is the choice and criteria of selection of the pacing mode. The authors studied 29 patients with CSH treated by VVI pacing over a period of 10 years. The average follow-up was 34 months (range 6 to 96 months). Three of the 27 patients (11%) who were asymptomatic at the outset continued to have symptoms. The nature of the CSH was well-defined in 25 patients; 19 of the 20 cases of cardio-inhibitory CSH and 4 of the 5 cases of mixed CSH were asymptomatic. These two poor clinical results were analysed: the patient with the cardio-inhibitory CSH (one recurrence in 84 months) had a drop of 40 mmHg in systolic blood pressure which fulfilled criteria of the cardio-inhibitory form of CSH (a drop of 30 to 50 mmHg). The second case was a complete therapeutic failure with 3 recurrent syncopal episodes. The patient had a mixed form of CSH (B.P. drop of 65 mmHg) associated with a "pace maker syndrome" (drop of 50 mmHg in systolic blood pressure at the onset of VVI pacing without any sino carotid massage). The authors conclude that the cases of CSH which, during their investigation, are best corrected by dual-chamber pacing or which are associated with a significant pacemaker effect or present retrograde ventriculo-atrial conduction, should receive dual-chamber pacemakers.