Exazerbation der COPD

Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is defined as an acute change in a patient’s baseline symptoms sufficient to warrant a change in therapy. Prevention of exacerbation and its expedient treatment are major goals for reducing the morbidity, mortality and cost of this condition. Common causes of exacerbation are viral and/or bacterial respiratory tract infections. Typical pathogens are H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis. In late stages of COPD an increasing number of gram-negative pathogens like Klebsiella, Proteus, Enterobacter spp., but also Pseudomonas spp. can be detected. Respiratory viruses may also play an important role in exacerbation. The treatment of exacerbation is based on the severity of the clinical symptoms and varies from outpatient therapy to hospitalisation or admission of the patient to an intensive care unit. Short-acting β2-agonists, cholinergic antagonists, corticosteroids and probably theophylline derivatives are the baseline therapy. The indication for antibiotic treatment is not obligatory and is determined by the clinical symptoms and the severity of the exacerbation. For hypercapnic patients with respiratory acidosis or imminent exhaustion of respiratory muscles, early noninvasive ventilation can be successfully used to bridge the phase of exacerbation and improve prognosis.     

Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection and COPD: More evidence for lack of evidence?

Chlamydophila pneumoniae has been recognized as a common cause of respiratory tract infections affecting all age groups. The organism has been implicated as an infectious trigger for acute exacerbations of COPD. Moreover, the intracellular existence of this pathogen and the ability to cause chronic respiratory infections have led to a number of studies that investigated its possible association with disease development. The present paper examines and discusses the possible association of acute C. pneumoniae infection in episodes of acute exacerbation of COPD. It also reviews the existing evidence of chronic C. pneumoniae infection with disease pathogenesis and severity. The significant interstudy variation of the choice of diagnostic methods and criteria applied is most likely responsible for the great diversity of results observed. The use of well-standardized, commercially available diagnostic tools, as well as the adoption of a more unified diagnostic approach is probably the key element missing in order to clarify the exact role of C. pneumoniae in COPD.     

Bacterial etiology and pneumococcal urinary antigen in moderate exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BackgroundThis study aimed to establish nationwide data for the distributions of typical and atypical bacterial pathogens in Korean patients with moderate acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and evaluate the clinical usefulness of a urinary antigen test (UAT) to detect Streptococcus pneumoniae.MethodsThis study was a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin with moxifloxacin for treating outpatients with moderate AECOPD. From clinics across South Korea, 342 subjects with AECOPD were enrolled, and their blood, sputum, and urine samples were collected at baseline. A serologic test, sputum culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and UAT were performed to identify bacterial pathogens. Bacterial prevalence and regional distributions were analyzed. The patients’ characteristics and clinical response between UAT-positive and UAT-negative groups were compared, as were the Streptococcus pneumoniae detection rates using conventional sputum culture and PCR versus UAT.ResultsThe most commonly isolated pathogen was Haemophilus influenzae (30.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (24.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.0%), with no significant regional differences in bacterial distribution. Patients with positive UAT for Streptococcus pneumoniae showed no clinical failure when treated with respiratory quinolone (0.0%), whereas 11.8% of patients with negative UAT showed clinical failure (P=0.037). UAT showed moderate agreement with sputum culture by kappa coefficient (κ=0.476).ConclusionsThe bacterial prevalence in patients with moderate AECOPD in South Korea showed correlations with the global prevalence, without significant regional differences. In outpatient settings, UAT has the potential to be used as a supplemental tool with sputum culture as a guide for determining the suspicion of bacterial exacerbation.     

Moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in outpatient acute exacerbations of COPD: MAESTRAL results

Bacterial infections causing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) frequently require antibacterial treatment. More evidence is needed to guide antibiotic choice. The Moxifloxacin in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis TriaL (MAESTRAL) was a multiregional, randomised, double-blind non-inferiority outpatient study. Patients were aged ≥ 60 yrs, with an Anthonisen type I exacerbation, a forced expiratory volume in 1 s < 60% predicted and two or more exacerbations in the last year. Following stratification by steroid use patients received moxifloxacin 400 mg p.o. q.d. (5 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125 mg p.o. b.i.d. (7 days). The primary end-point was clinical failure 8 weeks post-therapy in the per protocol population. Moxifloxacin was noninferior to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid at the primary end-point (111 (20.6%) out of 538, versus 114 (22.0%) out of 518, respectively; 95% CI -5.89-3.83%). In patients with confirmed bacterial AECOPD, moxifloxacin led to significantly lower clinical failure rates than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (in the intent-to-treat with pathogens, 62 (19.0%) out of 327 versus 85 (25.4%) out of 335, respectively; p=0.016). Confirmed bacterial eradication at end of therapy was associated with higher clinical cure rates at 8 weeks post-therapy overall (p=0.0014) and for moxifloxacin (p=0.003). Patients treated with oral corticosteroids had more severe disease and higher failure rates. The MAESTRAL study showed that moxifloxacin was as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of outpatients with AECOPD. Both therapies were well tolerated.     

The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to azithromycin for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) of suspected bacterial origin. Between October 1998 and April 1999, 567 patients with AECB were enrolled at 37 centers across the United States and Canada of which 280 (49%) had acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administered once daily for 5 days or azithromycin for 5 days (500 mg qd x 1, then 250 mg qd x 4). For the purpose of study blinding, all patients received encapsulated tablets. The main outcome measure was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (14-21 days post-therapy). Secondary measures included bacteriologic response and a time-course of bacteriological eradication (one center only). Three patient populations were analysed for efficacy: clinically-valid, microbiologically-valid (i.e. those with a pretherapy pathogen), and intent-to-treat (i.e. received at least one dose of study drug). For the efficacy-valid group, clinical response at the test-of-cure visit was 88% for patients in each treatment group. In 237 microbiologically-valid patients, corresponding clinical resolution rates were 88% for 5-day moxifloxacin vs. 86% for 5-day azithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 94% for the azithromycin group. Corresponding eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 89% and 86%, respectively. Of note, eradication rates at test-of-cure for Haem. philos influenzae and H. parainfluenzae for moxifloxacin were 97% and 88% compared to 83% and 62% respectively for azithromycin. Among 567 intent-to-treat patients (283 moxifloxacin and 284 azithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 22% and 17%, respectively. Diarrhea and nausea were the most common drug-related events reported in each treatment group. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days was found to be clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to 5-day azithromycin for the treatment of AECB of proven bacterial etiology. Given its excellent in-vitro activity, especially against antibiotic-resistant respiratory pathogens, and its acceptable safety profile, moxifloxacin should be considered an effective alternative therapy for patients with AECB of suspected bacterial origin.     

Bacteria in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: phenomenon or epiphenomenon?

Our understanding of the pathogenesis and consequences of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has increased considerably in the past decade. Several new lines of evidence support bacterial causation of approximately half of the exacerbations in COPD. Acquisition of new strains of bacterial pathogens in patients with COPD is associated with a substantial increase in risk of exacerbation. Bacterial pathogens are isolated in significant concentrations from bronchoscopic samples obtained during acute exacerbation. Neutrophilic airway inflammation is associated with isolation of bacterial pathogens from sputum. A specific immune response to the infecting strains of bacterial pathogens isolated from sputum during exacerbations has been demonstrated. Future work should strive to understand better the host-pathogen interaction that leads to an exacerbation and to develop novel therapeutic and preventive measures.     

Bronchiectasis exacerbations: The role of atypical bacteria and respiratory syncytial virus

BACKGROUND:

Aside from the known role of common bacteria, there is a paucity of data regarding the possible role of atypical bacteria and viruses in exacerbations of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the possible role of atypical bacteria (namely, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) as causative agents of bronchiectasis exacerbations.

METHODS:

A cohort of 33 patients was studied over a two-year period (one year follow-up for each patient). Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of M pneumoniae, C pneumoniae and RSV in bronchoalveolar lavage samples were performed during all visits. Antibody titres (immunoglobulin [Ig]M and IgG) against the aforementioned pathogens were also measured. In addition, cultures for common bacteria and mycobacteria were performed from the bronchoalveolar lavage samples.

RESULTS:

Fifteen patients experienced a total of 19 exacerbations during the study period. Although RSV was detected by polymerase chain reaction during stable visits in four patients, it was never detected during an exacerbation. M pneumoniae and C pneumoniae were never detected at stable visits or during exacerbations. IgM antibody titres for these three pathogens were negative in all patient visits.

CONCLUSIONS:

Atypical pathogens and RSV did not appear to be causative agents of bronchiectasis exacerbations.     

Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for relevant studies. Two reviewers extracted data and reviewed the quality of the studies independently. The primary outcome was clinical success at early follow-up. Study-level data were pooled using a random-effects model when I² was >50% or a fixed-effects model when I² was <50%.

Results

Eleven randomized controlled studies were considered. There was no difference between moxifloxacin and comparator agents with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat (ITT) [odds ratio (OR) =1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.42], clinically evaluable (CE) (OR 1.13, 95% CI, 0.93-1.37) patients, or adverse effects in general (OR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.86-1.17). Moxifloxacin was associated with better microbiological success (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.85).

Conclusions

Moxifloxacin was as clinically equivalent and bacteriologically superior to the antibiotic regimens routinely used in patients with AECB and AECOPD. Moxifloxacin therapy may be a promising and safe alternative to empirical treatment for AECB and AECOPD.KEYWORDS : Moxifloxacin, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), meta-analysis, systematic review     

Experimental pulmonary infection and colonization of Haemophilus influenzae in emphysematous hamsters

BackgroundBacterial infection has been considered the main cause of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, experimental model of COPD exacerbation induced by Haemophilus influenzae infection was not available up to now. Furthermore, only a few studies on evaluation of antibiotics using an H. influenzae infection model in mice have been reported. The aim of this work was to evaluate the activity of moxifloxacin on experimental pulmonary infection and colonization of H. influenzae in emphysematous hamsters.MethodsPulmonary emphysema was developed by intratracheal instillation of porcine pancreatic elastase in golden hamsters, which were infected by agar-beads enclosing H. influenzae to establish animal models of AECOPD. Alterations of lung histopathology, inflammatory factor levels in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs), viable cell counting of lung tissue were determined on different days after challenge and moxifloxacin administration.ResultsLung bacterial counts of BALFs and homogenates were significantly higher in emphysematous hamsters than those in normal non-emphysematous animals from 1 to 3 weeks after intratracheal inoculation of bacterial agar-beads suspensions. Moreover, H. influenzae colonized and survived for a longer period of time in emphysematous lungs than in normal non-emphysematous lungs after challenge. Efficacy of 3-day intragastric administration of moxifloxacin was proved by reduction in pulmonary H. influenzae burden and alleviation of inflammatory responses on days 4, 8 and 21 post-inoculation. No planktonic bacteria were isolated from BALFs in the first week after moxifloxacin treatment, and bacterial load in lung tissue homogenates declined significantly. Nevertheless, after 3 weeks, bacterial load in BALFs and homogenates of emphysematous lungs recovered to a large quantity. Inflammation in lung tissue, including lung consolidation, hemorrhage, and neutrophils infiltration, was conspicuously improved after administration of moxifloxacin. Levels of inflammatory factors in plasma were significantly decreased on days 8 and 21 after treatment compared with that without drug therapy. Inflammatory factors in BALF were also reduced, among which IL-8 dropped down markedly in early stage.ConclusionOur results suggest that chronic bacterial infection and colonization is highly correlated with lung emphysematous lesions, which would be one of the important mechanisms for repeated attacks of acute exacerbations of chronic pulmonary diseases and uncertain efficacies of antibiotics.     

A Prediction Model for Bacterial Etiology in Acute Exacerbations of COPD

Abstract Objectives: Bacteria play a leading role in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but we lack predictors of bacterial etiology. We developed a prediction model for infection with gram-negative enteric bacteria (GNEB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: Clinical presentation, sputum characteristics, microbial sputum patterns, lung function and previous and concomitant medication were prospectively recorded in patients with moderate to severe exacerbation of COPD. Risk factors for a specific bacterial etiology were c alculated and a prediction model developed. Results: A total of 193 patients with acute exacerbation were included. In 121 (62.6%) of them a microbial etiology could be identified, most frequently Haemophilus influenzae (32 strains), Streptococcus pneumoniae (22 strains) and P. aeruginosa (12 strains). Multivariate analysis identified severe airflow obstruction and use of systemic steroids as predictors for exacerbation due to gram-negative enteric bacilli and P. aeruginosa. A prediction model including FEV1 < 35% of predicted value, systemic steroid use and prior antibiotic therapy within preceeding 3 months had a negative predictive of 89%, being a helpful tool in excluding patients at risk of exacerbation due to gram-negative enteric bacilli and P. aeruginosa when all criteria are absent. Conclusion: A simple prediction model based on three factors may identify COPD patients at low risk for exacerbations with gram-negative enteric bacilli and P. aeruginosa. Bacterial Etiology in COPD Exacerbations.     

Management of acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

An acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by an acute worsening of symptoms accompanied by lung infection. In severe cases, an acute exacerbation may cause respiratory failure and death. Successful management of acute exacerbation of COPD in either the inpatient or outpatient setting requires attention to a number of key issues. In this review, issues regarding the management of acute exacerbations of COPD are discussed. An inhaled beta-2 agonist along with the inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator are recommended. Antibiotic therapy has been demonstrated to improve clinical recovery and physical outcomes. It should be directed against the most commonly occurring pathogens and, in more severe cases, coverage against Gram-negative bacteria is considered. Short course of systemic steroids does provide benefit in hospitalized patients. Supplemental oxygen is appropriate for all patients with hypoxemia. Ventilatory support treatment may be necessary, noninvasive ventilatory assistance being preferable early in the course of the acute episode. In a high number of cases, endotracheal intubation may be avoided. Promoting smoking cessation and the use of influenzae and pneumococcal vaccination may help decrease frequency of episodes of these exacerbations.     

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Bronchitis

The syndrome of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) consists of chronic bronchitis (CB), bronchiectasis, emphysema, and reversible airway disease that combine uniquely in an individual patient. Older patients are at risk for COPD and its components—emphysema, CB, and bronchiectasis. Bacterial and viral infections play a role in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) and in acute exacerbations of CB (AECB) without features of COPD. Older patients are at risk for resistant bacterial organisms during their episodes of AECOPD and AECB. Organisms include the more‐common bacteria implicated in AECOPD/AECB such as Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Less‐common nonenteric, gram‐negative organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gram‐positive organisms including Staphylococcus aureus, and strains of nontuberculosis Mycobacteria are more often seen in AECOPD/AECB episodes involving elderly patients with frequent episodes of CB or those with bronchiectasis. Risk‐stratified antibiotic treatment guidelines appear useful for purulent episodes of AECOPD and episodes of AECB. These guidelines have not been prospectively validated for the general population and especially not for the elderly population. Using a risk‐stratification approach for elderly patients, first‐line antibiotics (e.g., amoxicillin, ampicillin, pivampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and doxycycline), with a more‐limited spectrum of antibacterial coverage, are used in patients who are likely to have a low probability of resistant organisms during AECOPD/AECB. Second‐line antibiotics (e.g., amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, second‐ or third‐generation cephalosporins, and respiratory fluoroquinolones) with a broader spectrum of coverage are reserved for patients with significant risk factors for resistant organisms and those who have failed initial antibiotic treatment.     

Antibiotikatherapie bei Exazerbation

Bacterial infections are involved in approximately 50% of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Pneumococci, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis are the main pathogens. Studies using quantitative cultures and molecular typing suggest a causal relationship between bacterial infection and exacerbation. Furthermore, an association between infection and bronchial inflammation has been demonstrated. In contrast to steroid therapy and non-invasive ventilation, the benefits of antibiotic treatment are not well established. Current guidelines recommend antimicrobial therapy for AECB in type I exacerbations, for patients needing ventilatory support and for patients with cardiac comorbidity. Bacterial eradication is able to prolong the infection free interval.     

Pseudomonal Infections in Patients with COPD

COPD is a common disease with increasing prevalence. The chronic course of the disease is characterized by acute exacerbations that cause significant worsening of symptoms. Bacterial infections play a dominant role in approximately half of the episodes of acute exacerbations of COPD. The importance of pseudomonal infection in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD stems from its relatively high prevalence in specific subgroups of these patients, and particularly its unique therapeutic ramifications. The colonization rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with COPD in a stable condition is low.A review of a large number of clinical series of unselected outpatients with acute exacerbations of COPD revealed that P. aeruginosa was isolated from the patients’ sputum at an average rate of 4%. This rate increased significantly in COPD patients with advanced airflow obstruction, in whom the rate of sputum isolates of P. aeruginosa reached 8–13% of all episodes of acute exacerbations of COPD. However, the great majority of bacteria isolated in these patients were not P. aeruginosa, but the three classic bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The subgroup of patients, with acute exacerbations of COPD, with the highest rate of P. aeruginosa infection, which approaches 18% of the episodes, is mechanically ventilated patients. However, even in this subgroup the great majority of bacteria isolated are the above-mentioned three classic pathogens.In light of these epidemiologic data and other important considerations, and in order to achieve optimal antibacterial coverage for the common infectious etiologies, empiric antibacterial therapy should be instituted as follows. Patients with acute exacerbations of COPD with advanced airflow obstruction (FEV₁ <50% of predicted under stable conditions) should receive once daily oral therapy with one of the newer fluoroquinolones, i.e. levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, or gemifloxacin for 5–10 days. Patients with severe acute exacerbations of COPD who are receiving mechanical ventilation should receive amikacin in addition to one of the intravenous preparations of the newer fluoroquinolones or monotherapy with cefepime, a carbapenem or piperacillin/tazobactam. In both subgroups it is recommended that sputum cultures be performed before initiation of therapy so that the results can guide further therapy.     

Short-term and long-term outcomes of moxifloxacin compared to standard antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of oral moxifloxacin with standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). DESIGN: Multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind study of two parallel treatment arms. PATIENTS: Outpatients >or= 45 years old with stable chronic bronchitis, smoking history of >or= 20 pack-years, two or more AECBs in the previous year, and FEV(1) < 85% of predicted value. Patients were enrolled when in a stable condition, and patients with exacerbations within 12 months of enrollment were randomized. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization (stratified on steroid use) between moxifloxacin (400 mg qd for 5 days) and standard therapy (amoxicillin [500 mg tid for 7 days], clarithromycin [500 mg bid for 7 days], or cefuroxime-axetil [250 mg bid for 7 days]). MEASUREMENTS: Assessment at enrollment, randomization (Anthonisen type 1 exacerbation), 7 to 10 days after treatment, and monthly until next AECB or up to 9 months. The primary efficacy variable was clinical success (sufficient improvement, no alternative antimicrobial therapy required) 7 to 10 days after therapy. Secondary predefined end points were clinical cure (return to pre-exacerbation status), further antimicrobial use, time to next AECB, and bacteriologic success. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four patients received moxifloxacin, and 376 patients received standard therapy. At 7 to 10 days after therapy, clinical success rates were similar in intention-to-treat (ITT) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.7 to 9.5) and per-protocol (PP) patients (95% CI, - 3.0 to 8.5). Moxifloxacin showed superior clinical cure rates over standard therapy in both ITT patients (95% CI, 1.4 to 14.9) and PP patients (95% CI, 0.3 to 15.6), and higher bacteriologic success in microbiologically valid patients (95% CI, 0.4 to 22.1). Fewer ITT patients required antimicrobials after treatment with moxifloxacin than standard therapy (p < 0.01). Time to next exacerbation was longer with moxifloxacin; median and mean times to new AECBs in ITT patients who did not require any further antibiotics were 131.0 days and 132.8 days in moxifloxacin, and 103.5 days and 118.0 days in standard therapy, respectively (p = 0.03). The occurrence of failure, new exacerbation, or any further antibiotic was less frequent in moxifloxacin-treated patients for up to 5 months of follow-up (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin was equivalent to standard therapy for clinical success and showed superiority over standard therapy in clinical cure, bacteriologic eradication, and long-term outcomes.     

Acute exacerbation of COPD

The literature of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is fast expanding. This review focuses on several aspects of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) including epidemiology, diagnosis and management. COPD poses a major health and economic burden in the Asia‐Pacific region, as it does worldwide. Triggering factors of AECOPD include infectious (bacteria and viruses) and environmental (air pollution and meteorological effect) factors. Disruption in the dynamic balance between the ‘pathogens’ (viral and bacterial) and the normal bacterial communities that constitute the lung microbiome likely contributes to the risk of exacerbations. The diagnostic approach to AECOPD varies based on the clinical setting and severity of the exacerbation. After history and examination, a number of investigations may be useful, including oximetry, sputum culture, chest X‐ray and blood tests for inflammatory markers. Arterial blood gases should be considered in severe exacerbations, to characterize respiratory failure. Depending on the severity, the acute management of AECOPD involves use of bronchodilators, steroids, antibiotics, oxygen and noninvasive ventilation. Hospitalization may be required, for severe exacerbations. Nonpharmacological interventions including disease‐specific self‐management, pulmonary rehabilitation, early medical follow‐up, home visits by respiratory health workers, integrated programmes and telehealth‐assisted hospital at home have been studied during hospitalization and shortly after discharge in patients who have had a recent AECOPD. Pharmacological approaches to reducing risk of future exacerbations include long‐acting bronchodilators, inhaled steroids, mucolytics, vaccinations and long‐term macrolides. Further studies are needed to assess the cost‐effectiveness of these interventions in preventing COPD exacerbations.     

Role of bacteria in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background and study objective

Infections are major causes of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which result in significant mortality and morbidity. The primary aim of the study was to determine the microbiological spectrum including atypical agents in acute exacerbations. The secondary aim was to evaluate resistance patterns in the microorganisms.

Methods

The sputum culture of 75 patients admitted to our clinic from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2002 was evaluated prospectively, for aerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and serologically for Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Sensitivity patterns in potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs) were also investigated.

Results

An infectious agent was identified in 46 patients, either serologically or with sputum culture. Pathogens most commonly demonstrated were: Haemophilus influenzae (30%), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (17%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (9%). Mixed infections were diagnosed in 9 patients. PPMs showed a high resistance rate to commonly used antibiotics.

Conclusion

We have shown that microorganisms causing acute exacerbations of COPD are not only typical bacteria (46%) but also atypical pathogens (26%), with unpredictable high rates. Typical agents showed a high resistance to commonly used antibiotics.     

The role of antibiotics in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Our understanding of the pathogenesis and consequences of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has increased considerably in the past decade. Several new lines of evidence support bacterial causation of about half the exacerbations. Contrary to previous data, recent studies with improved methodology have demonstrated that exacerbations do contribute to the loss of lung function in COPD. Another interesting new observation is that colonization by bacterial pathogens may not be innocuous, and in fact may lead to airway inflammation and contribute to pathogenesis of COPD. Evidence that bacteria cause exacerbations, that exacerbations contribute to loss of lung function, and that chronic colonization by bacteria may be harmful, has emphasized the potential importance of appropriate antibiotics in the treatment of exacerbations. An unfortunate paucity of data does not allow evidence-based recommendations to be made for optimal choice of antibiotics for exacerbations of COPD. Emerging data that antibiotics differ in unconventional measures of efficacy such as time to next exacerbation, improvement in health-related quality of life, and bacteriologic eradication will help us make concrete recommendations in the future.