Non-small-bowel abnormalities identified during small bowel capsule endoscopy

AIM:To investigate the incidence of non-small-bowelabnormalities in patients referred for small bowel capsule endoscopy,this single center study was performed.METHODS:Small bowel capsule endoscopy is an accepted technique to investigate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.This is defined as bleeding from the digestive tract that persists or recurs without an obviousetiology after a normal gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.Nevertheless,capsule endoscopy sometimesreveals findings outside the small bowel,i.e.,withinreach of conventional endoscopes.In this retrospectivesingle center study,595 patients undergoing capsuleendoscopy between 2003 and 2009 were studied.Theincidence of non-small bowel abnormalities was defined as visible abnormalities detected by capsule endoscopy that are located within reach of conventionalendoscopes.RESULTS:In 595 patients,referred for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or for suspected Crohn’s disease,abnormalities were found in 306(51.4%).Of these 306patients,85(27.7%)had abnormalities within reach of conventional endoscopes;63 had abnormalities apparently overlooked at previous conventional endoscopies,10 patients had not undergone upper and lower endoscopy prior to capsule endoscopy and 12 had abnormalities that were already known prior to capsule endoscopy.The most common type of missed lesions were vascular lesions(n=47).Non-small-bowel abnormalities were located in the stomach(n=15),proximal small bowel(n=22),terminal ileum(n=21),colon(n=19)or at other or multiple locations(n=8).Ten patients with abnormal findings in the terminal ileum had not undergone examination of the ileum during colonoscopy.CONCLUSION:A significant proportion of patients undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy had lesions within reach of conventional endoscopes,indicating that capsule endoscopy was unnecessarily performed.     

The Outcome Assessment of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy for Diagnosing and Managing Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Diagnosing and treating patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is clinically challenging. Most lesions responsible for the origin of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding are located in the small bowel. Double-balloon enteroscopy is a novel method for exploring the small intestine and has significant therapeutic potential. This study evaluated the value of double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosing and managing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. From October 2003 to January 2006, a total of 20 patients (6 men, 14 women; mean age, 55.2 years old) with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (18 obscure overt bleeding, 2 obscure occult bleeding) were investigated by double-balloon enteroscopy. A total of 29 procedures (15 via oral approach and 14 via rectal approach) were performed. The diagnostic yield, endoscopic therapeutic procedures, complications, and outcome were then assessed. Small bowel lesions potentially responsible for the bleeding were identified in 15 (75%) of 20 patients, including 9 angiodysplasias, 2 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 2 ulcers, 1 jejunal granulation polyp, and 1 Peutz-Jeghers polyposis. Endoscopic treatments including heater probe coagulation, polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection were performed in 11 patients. Two patients with GISTs received surgical intervention. Two patients with angiodysplasias that endoscopic treatment failed underwent laparoscopic resections following tattooing. There were no complications and the procedures were tolerated well. Among the 15 patients who had a lesion identified with subsequent treatment, rebleeding occurred in 3 (20%) patients with angiodysplasias. Of the five patients in whom no definite lesion was detected, rebleeding developed in four (80%). For patients with an identified lesion that was further treated, the rebleeding rate was lower than for those with “persistent” obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (P=0.031). We conclude that double-balloon enteroscopy offers a safe and effective method for diagnosing and managing patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.     

Small bowel tumors detected and missed during capsule endoscopy: Single center experience

AIM:To characterize small bowel(SB)tumors detected by capsule endoscopy(CE),and identify missed tumors.METHODS:The study included 145 consecutive patients in whom 150 CEs were performed.Following CE,the medical records of the study population were reviewed.Results of double-or single-balloon enteroscopy performed after CE and the results of surgery in all patients operated on were retrieved.The patients were contacted through telephone interviews or postal mail.In addition,the national cancer registry and the polish clinical gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)Registry were searched to identify missed neoplasms.RESULTS:Indications for CE included overt and occult obscure gastrointestinal bleeding(n=81,53.7%),anemia(n=19,12.7%),malabsorption(n=18,12%),abnormal CB follow through(n=9,6%),abdominal pain(n=7,5%),celiac disease(n=5,3%),neuroendocrine tumor(n=3,2%),Crohn’s disease(n=2,<2%),Peutz-Jeghers syndrome(n=2,<2%),other polyposes(n=2,<2%),and diarrhea(n=2,<2%).The capsule reached the colon in 115(76.6%)examinations.In 150 investigations,CE identified 15SB tumors(10%),14 of which were operated on or treated endoscopically.Malignancies included metastatic melanoma(n=1),adenocarcinoma(n=2),and GIST(n=3).Benign neoplasms included dysplastic Peutz-Jeghers polyps(n=4).Non-neoplastic masses included venous malformation(n=1),inflammatory tumors(n=2),and a mass of unknown histology(n=1).During the follow-up period,three additional SB tumors were found(2 GISTs and one mesenteric tumor of undefined nature).The National Cancer Registry and Polish Clinical GIST Registry revealed no additional SB neoplasms in the post-examination period(follow-up:range 4.2-102.5 mo,median 39 mo).The sensitivity of CE for tumor detection was 83.3%,and the negative predictive value was 97.6%.The specificity and positive predictive value were both 100%.CONCLUSION:Neoplasms may be missed by CE,especially in the proximal SB.In overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding,complementary endoscopic and/or radiologic diagnostic tests are indi     

A case of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the jejunum which was diagnosed by capsule endoscopy

More than 90% cases of chronic gastrointestinal bleeding can be diagnosed by upper endoscopy and/or colonoscopy, and therefore, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding has been defined as bleeding of unknown origin that persists after these conventional endoscopic evaluation. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors, but the most common form of mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Small bowel is the second most common primary site for GISTs, and accounts for 2-10% of chronic bleeding sites. GISTs usually present as a sporadic and solitary tumor, and a minority of the cases of multiple GISTs are discovered as forms of hereditary or idiopathic tumor syndromes. Small bowel tumor has been difficult to diagnose because of absence of accurate and proper diagnostic tools. Recently developed wireless capsule endoscopy helps in the diagnostic work-up of small bowel diseases. We report a case of multiple jejunal GISTs presenting melena in a 39-year-old male, which was diagnosed with wireless capsule endoscopy.     

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors:Imaging features with clinical and pathological correlation

AIM:To investigate computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) manifestations of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) in order to enhance the recognition of these rare tumors.METHODS:Fourteen patients with pathologically proven rectal GISTs were retrospectively reviewed.Patient histories were retrospectively reviewed for patient age,gender,presenting symptoms,endoscopic investigations,operation notes and pathologic slides.All tumors were evaluated for CD117,CD34 expression,and the tumors were stratified according to current criteria of the National Institutes of Health(NIH).In all cases the first pre-operation imaging findings(CT and MRI,n = 3;MRI only,n = 8;CT only,n = 3) were analyzed by two experienced radiologists by consensus,which include:tumor size,shape,CT density(hypodense,isodense and hyperdense),MRI signal intensity(hypointense,isointense and hyperintense),epicenter(intraluminal or extraluminal),margin(well-defined or ill-defined),internal component(presence of calcifications,necrosis,hemorrhage or ulceration),pattern and degree of enhancement,invasion into adjacent structures.After review of the radiologic studies,clinical and pathological findings were correlated with radiological findings.RESULTS:The patients,13 men and 1 woman,were aged 31-62 years(mean = 51.5 ± 10.7 years).The most common initial presentation was hematochezia(n = 6).The mean tumor diameter was 5.68 ± 2.64 cm(range 1.5-11.2 cm).Eight lesions were round or oval,and 6 lesions were irregular.Eleven lesions were welldefined and 3 had ill-defined margins.Ten tumors were extraluminal and 4 were intraluminal.The density and MR signal intensity of the solid component of the lesions were similar to that of muscle on unenhanced CT(n = 6) and T1-weighted images(n = 11),and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images.Calcification was detected in 2 tumors.Following intravenous injection of contrast media,3 lesions had mild enhancement and 11 lesions had moderate enhancement.Enhancement was homogenous in 3 lesions and hete     

Double-balloon enteroscopy for mesenchymal tumors of small bowel:Nine years’ experience

AIM:To assess the value of double-balloon enteroscopy(DBE) for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors(GIMTs) in the small bowel and clarify their clinical and endoscopic characteristics.METHODS:A retrospective review in a total of 783 patients who underwent a DBE procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 was conducted.Data from patients with pathologically confirmed GIMTs were analyzed at a single tertiary center with nine years’ experience.The primary outcomes assessed included characteristics of patients with GIMTs,indications for DBE,overall diagnostic yield of GIMTs,endoscopic morphology,positive biopsy,comparison of diagnosis with capsule endoscopy,and subsequent interventional management.RESULTS:GIMTs were identified and analyzed in 77 patients.The mean age was 47.74 ± 14.14 years(range:20-77 years),with 63.6% being males.The majority of individuals presented with gastrointestinal bleeding,accounting for 81.8%,followed by abdominal pain,accounting for 10.4%.Small bowel pathologies were found in 71 patients,the detection rate was 92.2%.The diagnostic yield of DBE for GIMTs was 88.3%.DBE was superior to capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of GIMTs(P = 0.006;McNemar’s χ2 test).Gastrointestinal stromal tumor was the most frequent and leiomyoma was the second frequent GIMT.Single and focal lesions were typical of GIMTs,and masses with smooth or unsmooth surface were the most common in the small bowel.GIMTs were removed from all the patients surgically except one patient treated with endoscopic resection.CONCLUSION:DBE is a safe and valuable procedure for patients with suspected GIMTs,and it provides an accurate position for subsequent surgical intervention.     

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the duodenum: single institution experience

Background

Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of the duodenum are rare. The aim of this study was to review the surgical management of GISTs in this anatomically complex region.

Methods

Retrospective review from January 1999 to August 2011 of patients with primary GISTs of the duodenum.

Results

Forty-one patients underwent resection of duodenal GISTs. All operations were performed with intent to cure with negative margins of resection. The most common location of origin was the second portion of the duodenum. Local excision (n = 19), segmental resection with primary anastomosis (n = 11) and a pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 11) were performed. Two patients underwent an ampullectomy with local excision. Peri-operative mortality and overall morbidity were 0 and 12, respectively. Patients with high-risk GISTs (P = 0.008) and those who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy (P = 0.021) were at a greater risk for morbidity. The median follow-up was 18 months. Eight patients developed recurrence. High-risk GISTs and neoplasms with ulceration had the greatest risk for recurrence (P = 0.017, P = 0.029 respectively). The actuarial 3- and 5-year survivals were 85% and 74%, respectively.

Conclusion

The choice and type of resection depends on the proximity to the ampulla of Vater, involvement of adjacent organs and the ability to obtain negative margins. The morbidity depends on the type of procedure for GIST.     

Small bowel ulcerative lesions are common in elderly NSAIDs users with peptic ulcer bleeding

AIM: To determine the frequency of small bowel ulcerative lesions in patients with peptic ulcer and define the significance of those lesions.METHODS: In our prospective study, 60 consecutive elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a peptic ulceration (cases) and 60 matched patients with a non-bleeding peptic ulcer (controls) underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy, after a negative colonoscopy (compulsory in our institution). Controls were evaluated for non-bleeding indications. Known or suspected chronic inflammatory conditions and medication that could harm the gut were excluded. During capsule endoscopy, small bowel ulcerative lesions were counted thoroughly and classified according to Graham classification. Other small bowel lesions were also recorded. Peptic ulcer bleeding was controlled endoscopically, when adequate, proton pump inhibitors were started in both cases and controls, and Helicobacter pylori eradicated whenever present. Both cases and controls were followed up for a year. In case of bleeding recurrence upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was repeated and whenever it remained unexplained it was followed by repeat colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy.RESULTS: Forty (67%) cases and 18 (30%) controls presented small bowel erosions (P = 0.0001), while 22 (37%) cases and 4 (8%) controls presented small bowel ulcers (P < 0.0001). Among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumers, 39 (95%) cases and 17 (33%) controls presented small bowel erosions (P < 0.0001), while 22 (55%) cases and 4 (10%) controls presented small bowel ulcers (P < 0.0001). Small bowel ulcerative lesions were infrequent among patients not consuming NSAIDs. Mean entry hemoglobin was 9.3 (SD = 1.4) g/dL in cases with small bowel ulcerative lesions and 10.5 (SD = 1.3) g/dL in those without (P = 0.002). Cases with small bowel ulcers necessitate more units of packed red blood cells. During their hospitalization, 6 (27%) cases with small bowel ulcers presented bleeding recurrence most possibly attributed to small bowel ulcers, nevertheless 30-d mortality was zero. Presence of chronic obstructive lung disease and diabetes was related with unexplained recurrence of hemorrhage in logistic regression analysis, while absence of small bowel ulcers was protective (relative risk 0.13, P = 0.05).CONCLUSION: Among NSAID consumers, more bleeders than non-bleeders with peptic ulcers present small bowel ulcers; lesions related to more severe bleeding and unexplained episodes of bleeding recurrence.     

Treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor of small bowel： Implications of imatinib mesylate

AIM: To examine the impact of imatinib mesylate (Glivec) on patient survival and response and its safety,and the correlation of the response rate with the kit gene mutation status. METHODS: Thirty-three of 74 (44.6%) small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients who developed recurrence after curative resection and not treated with Glivec were classified as group A patients. Twenty-two advanced small bowel GIST patients treated with Glivec were classified as group B patients. Clinicopathological features, post-recurrence and overall survival rates were compared. Each tumor in group B patients was investigated for mutations of kit or plateletderived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA). The mutation type was correlated with clinical outcomes. The antitumor effect and safety of Glivec in group B patients were also assessed. RESULTS: Advanced small bowel GIST patients treated with Glivec had substantially longer post-recurrence survival and higher overall survival rates than those not treated with Glivec. A total of 15 patients had a partial response (PR) (67.8%). Activated mutations of c-kit were found in 16 of 19 tested patients and no PDGFRA mutant was identified. In 13 patients with GISTs harboring exon 11 kit mutations, the partial response rate (PR) was 69.3%, whereas two of three patients with tumors containing an exon 9 kit mutation had an overall response rate (ORR) of 66.7% (not significant). CONCLUSION: Glivec significantly prolongs the post-recurrence and overall survival of Asian patients with advanced GISTs. Glivec induces a sustained objective response in more than half of Asian patients with advanced small bowel GISTs. Activated mutations of kit exon 11 are detectable in the vast majority of GISTs. There is no difference in the PR rate for patients whose GISTs have kit exon 9 and exon 11 mutations.     

Capsule endoscopy in small bowel tumors: A multicenter Korean study

Background and Aim: Capsule endoscopy (CE) has proven to be highly effective at detecting small bowel lesions in a variety of clinical conditions, but studies concerning the practical impact of CE on small bowel tumors are still scarce, especially in the Asian population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of CE in the field of small bowel tumors. Methods: CE records consecutively pooled from the beginning of use of CE in Korea, October 2001 until April 2008, in 14 centers throughout Korea were reviewed. Clinical information and CE video images of small bowel tumors were analyzed. Results: A total of 1332 cases undergoing CE were reviewed with all clinical indications. Small bowel tumors were diagnosed with CE in 57 (4.3%) of 1332 patients. The tumors were malignant in 33 cases, and included three adenocarcinomas, eight lymphomas, 20 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and two metastatic cancers. The most frequent indications for CE in malignant tumors were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, followed by abdominal pain and weight loss. Thirty of 57 tumors were identified exclusively by CE (diagnostic impact = 30/57), and they were smaller in size (mean, range: 14.3 mm, 2–35 mm) compared to the other tumors detected in radiological studies (48.7 mm, 10–110 mm). Seven patients underwent surgical resection (therapeutic impact = 7/57). Conclusion: CE effectively identifies small bowel tumors that are undetectable by conventional radiological studies (diagnostic impact = 52.6%) and can critically change the therapeutic course (therapeutic impact = 12.3%).     

不明原因消化道出血的DSA和介入治疗

背景：不明原因消化道出血的诊断和治疗是临床的一大难题．数字减影血管造影（DSA）对不明原因消化道出血的诊断具有独到的优势。目的：探讨DSA和介入治疗对不明原因消化道出血的诊断和治疗价值。方法：对2008年9月～2010年10月哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院收治的82例不明原因消化道出血患者行DSA．发现可疑病变行动脉栓塞或药物灌注等介入治疗。结果：DSA阳性者64例,诊断率78．0％,其中小肠出血58例,术后吻合口出血6例。22例患者表现为造影剂外溢的出血直接征象,42例表现为间接征象;26例（40．6％）患者的出血原因为小肠肿瘤,18例为憩室（28．1％）。17例患者（16例动脉栓塞、1例药物灌注）接受介入治疗,取得良好的疗效。结论：DSA能明确不明原因消化道出血的部位和病因。并能对部分患者行介入治疗．具有较高的诊断和治疗价值。     

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: clinical, pathologic features and effectiveness of new diagnostic criteria]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The effective and reproducible diagnostic parameters for differentiating benign from malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are still not clear. In this study, GISTs were diagnosed and classified by immunohistochemistry and their clinical and pathologic features were investigated. GISTs were re-evaluated by Amin's and NIH's criteria, and prognostic relevance of these two criteria were compared. METHODS: Fifty cases of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor diagnosed from May 1990 to February 2000, were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for CD117, CD34, smooth muscle actin, and S-100 protein. GISTs were diagnosed according to Amin's and NIH's criteria. The relationship between the prognosis and diagnosis based on Amin's or NIH's classification were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty cases of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors were diagnosed as GISTs. The stomach (40%) and small bowel (40%) were the most common origin for GISTs. Immunophenotypically, null, myoid, neural, combined type were 70.0%, 10.0%, 16.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Seven cases showed metastasis and one case showed recurrence. According to Amin's criteria, 5 benign, 8 borderline and 17 malignant tumors were diagnosed. The NIH's criteria showed 2 very low risk, 6 low risk, 7 intermediate risk, and 15 high risk tumors. Metastasis or recurrence of GISTs had no significant relationship with malignancy according to Amin's criteria (p=0.4069) but had significant correlation with high risk tumor based on NIH's criteria. (p=0.0352). CONCLUSIONS: GISTs showing local invasion, distant metastasis or recurrence were related with high risk tumors based on NIH's criteria. NIH's criteria might be better reliable scheme than Amin's for predicting the prognosis of GISTs.     

Double-Balloon Enteroscopy and Small Bowel Tumors: A South-European Single-Center Experience

Small bowel tumors are rare, accounting for 1–2% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. We sought to determine the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in patients with small bowel tumors. Between January 2005 and March 2008, 78 patients underwent 96 DBE. All nine patients (seven males; mean age 68 ± 11.3 years) with small bowel tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical presentation was: mid-gastrointestinal bleeding or iron-deficient anemia (55.6%); abdominal pain (22.2%); nausea/vomiting and abdominal distension (22.2%). Five patients had abnormal findings in previous capsule endoscopy and four in previous radiologic examinations. Route of insertion was exclusively oral and abnormal lesions were detected in all patients (jejunum 8; ileum 1). Biopsies were taken in seven patients and provided definitive histological diagnosis in all except one. There were no complications of DBE. Surgical resection took place in eight patients. Final histologic diagnosis were: primary carcinoma (33.3%), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (33.3%), malignant lymphoma (22.2%), and carcinoid tumor (11.1%). Mean follow-up time was 15.4 ± 12.7 months (range 2–34 months). Six patients were submitted to chemotherapy. Two patients died. Small bowel tumors are common in patients submitted to DBE. Given its safety and diagnostic capabilities, DBE should be considered the gold-standard method in the study of these neoplasms.     

Treatment recommendations for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: positive endoscopic resection

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection and discuss the treatment strategy of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) less than 2?cm.

Material and methods: The data of 713 patients, who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), were retrospectively analyzed. We investigated the clinicopathological features and analyzed the risk potential of small gastric GISTs, and documented therapeutic and follow-up outcomes. We also compared the follow-up results between operated patients and 58 patients who were suspected of small gastric GISTs and underwent regular surveillance under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the same period.

Results: GISTs were the most common gastric SMTs (289 cases, 40.5%), of which small GISTs were found in 250 cases. The mitotic index was less than 5 in all cases. However, 122 out of 250 cases (48.8%) had adverse factors under EUS, which were related to tumor size (p?<?.01). ESD was successfully performed in all patients, and no serious complication or perioperative death occurred. The follow-up period for 42.07?±?22.49 months revealed improvement of symptoms in 80.2% patients and showed no recurrence or metastasis. Of the 58 patients selected for EUS surveillance, 48 (82.8%) presented with gastrointestinal symptoms and 41 out of 48 (85.4%) were not relieved during follow-up and 16 (27.6%) with severe psychological problems.

Conclusions: ESD is a safe and effective treatment for small GISTs, which helps to confirm the diagnosis, improve symptoms and reduce the psychological pressure. Thus, we recommend endoscopic resection is a good option for small gastric GISTs once diagnosed.     

Small bowel metastases from primary carcinoma of the lung: clinical findings and outcome

OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic small bowel metastases from primary carcinoma of the lung have been rarely reported. The aim of this study was to describe clinical presentation and outcome in a series of patients. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1996, 1544 patients with lung cancer were referred to our institution for surgery and 1399 were operated on. Seven of them developed a symptomatic small bowel metastasis. Clinical, radiological, and pathology records were reviewed. RESULTS: In 6 of 7 patients, the lung cancer was previously operated on from 0.5 to 24 months before the diagnosis of small bowel metastasis. In 1 patient, the primary tumor was diagnosed after small bowel metastasis resection. Clinical symptoms at presentation were acute peritonitis in 2 patients, progressive digestive obstruction in 3, and gastrointestinal bleeding in 2. The diagnosis was suspected on abdominal ultrasonography in 2 cases, and small bowel radiography in 3 cases. It was confirmed either by computed tomographic scan or by push enteroscopy. All patients underwent operation (intestinal resection in 6 and bypass in 1) with no postoperative death. Small bowel metastases were located in the jejunum in 2 patients, in the ileum in 3, and in both sites in 2. Histological features of the metastases were identical to the primary tumor: squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3), undifferentiated large cell carcinoma (n = 2), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 1), and adenocarcinoma (n = 1). In 6 patients, small bowel metastases were associated with other metastatic sites. Six patients died within 8 months after metastasis resection. One patient was alive 22 months after bowel resection. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic small bowel metastases can occur early in the course of lung cancer. Resection should be considered as the best palliative treatment to prevent bowel obstruction or peritonitis.     

Clinicopathologic differences of mesenchymal submucosal tumors between the esophagogastric junction and the upper stomach

Objective

We compared the clinicopathologic features between mesenchymal tumors located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and upper stomach, that had been removed surgically.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with a submucosal tumor (SMT) of the stomach, including the EGJ, were surgically treated over the last decade. Of these, 23 patients with SMTs located in the upper third of the stomach (n = 15; UG-group) and EGJ (n = 8; EGJ-group) were studied.

Results

The mean age was younger in the EGJ-group than in the UG-group, and the EGJ-group frequently showed symptoms. Histopathologically, 4 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 4 leiomyomas were observed in the EGJ-group, while 14 GISTs and one schwannoma were observed in the UG-group (p = 0.0096). Two tumors macroscopically showed a horseshoe or spiral type in the EGJ-group, while all tumors showed a ball/ball-like appearance in the UG-group. Regarding surgical procedures, 7 patients underwent laparotomy in the EGJ-group, while 9 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery in the UG-group. The mean operating time was longer and operative bleeding was greater in the EGJ-group than in the UG-group, respectively (p = 0.0015 and p = 0.0095). Postoperative complications were frequently observed in the EGJ-group. The EGJ-group showed no patients with recurrence and/or metastasis after surgery, while three cases with GISTs had them in the UG-group. In GISTs, the mean mitotic index of the UG-group was relatively more than that of the EGJ-group and a case was classified into the high-risk group, although there was no significance in the risk classification between the two groups.

Conclusion

SMTs included GISTs and leiomyomas in the EGJ, while the majority demonstrated GISTs in the upper stomach. SMTs of the EGJ were removed by a tailored approach to prevent recurrence as well as postoperative complications. The biological behavior of GISTs may be different between the EJG and stomach.     

Synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

Background Little is known about the synchronous occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and other gastrointestinal tumors. We present two cases of an invasive colon cancer with a synchronous small-bowel GIST; immunohistochemistry studies were performed to evaluate possible genetic similarities. Methods This paper reports two cases of synchronous GISTs and colorectal cancer (CRC) with immunohistochemistry analysis of c-Kit expression. This paper is also a review of the existing literature on the association of GISTs and CRC and the role of c-Kit in CRC. Results In the last 2 years, we observed two patients with synchronous CRCs and GISTs of the small bowel. The GISTs were incidentally discovered during the work-up for CRCs and excised at the time of the colon resection. Immunohistochemistry study did not reveal an expression of c-Kit in CRCs. Clinical implications of the association between these two neoplasms are described in this paper. Conclusions Synchronous CRC and GIST has been more frequently reported. Because of the limited number of cases, we cannot exclude an incidental relationship. The genetic pathways of tumorigenesis appear different for the two neoplasms. Further studies are needed to clarify a possible role of c-Kit in the development of colonic adenocarcinomas.     

Transarterial embolization for massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage following abdominal surgery

AIM:To evaluate the clinical results of angiography and embolization for massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage after abdominal surgery.METHODS:This retrospective study included 26 patients with postoperative hemorrhage after abdominal surgery. All patients underwent emergency transarterial angiography,and 21 patients underwent emergency embolization. We retrospectively analyzed the angiographic features and the clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization.RESULTS:Angiography showed that a discrete bleeding focus was detected in 21(81%) of 26 patients.Positive angiographic findings included extravasations of contrast medium(n = 9),pseudoaneurysms(n =9),and fusiform aneurysms(n = 3). Transarterial embolization was technically successful in 21(95%) of 22patients. Clinical success was achieved in 18(82%) of 22 patients. No postembolization complications were observed. Three patients died of rebleeding.CONCLUSION:The positive rate of angiographic findings in 26 patients with postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage was 81%. Transcatheter arterial embolization seems to be an effective and safe method in the management of postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage.