Outcome and prognostic factor analysis of 217 consecutive isolated limb perfusions with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan for limb-threatening soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND: Extensive and mutilating surgery is often required for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the limb. As it has become apparent that amputation for STS does not improve survival rates, the interest in limb-preserving approaches has increased. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) and melphalan is successful in providing local tumor control and enables limb-preserving surgery in a majority of cases. A mature, large, single-institution experience with 217 consecutive ILPs for STS of the extremity is reported. METHODS: At a prospectively maintained database at a tertiary referral center, 217 ILPs were performed from July 1991 to July 2003 in 197 patients with locally advanced STS of the extremity. ILPs were performed at mild hyperthermic conditions with 1-4 mg of TNF and 10-13 mg/L limb-volume melphalan (M) for leg and arm perfusions, respectively. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 75%. Limb salvage was achieved in 87% of the perfused limbs. Median survival post-ILP was 57 months and prognostic factors for survival were Trojani grade of the tumor and ILP for single versus multiple STS. The procedure could be performed safely, with a perioperative mortality of 0.5% in all patients with no age limit (median age, 54 yrs; range, 12-91). Systemic and locoregional toxicity were modest and easily manageable. CONCLUSION: TNF+M-based ILP can provide limb salvage in a significant percentage of patients with locally advanced STS and has therefore gained a permanent place in the multimodality treatment of STS.     

Multifocal soft tissue sarcoma: limb salvage following hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor and melphalan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prognosis for recurrent multifocal limb soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is dismal due to systemic spread. However, many of these patients undergo amputation due to ineffective local control. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan permits limb salvage and palliation for such patients. METHODS: Of 53 STS patients treated with hyperthermic ILP with TNF (3-4 mg) and melphalan (1-1.5 mg/kg), 13 (25%) had multifocal STS and were candidates for amputation. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 92% (12/13) with 38% complete response and 54% partial response. Two patients died during the early postoperative period. Limb salvage was achieved in 85% of patients. One patient (8%) had only stable disease and underwent amputation. Local recurrence occurred in 38% but did not result in amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of patients in this study is too small to allow definitive conclusions, it seems that ILP/TNF offer limb salvage and palliation for recurrent multifocal STS patients.     

Isolated limb perfusion for extremity soft-tissue sarcomas, in-transit metastases, and other unresectable tumors: Credits, debits, and future perspectives

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan is effective against melanoma in-transit metastases but has failed in the treatment of limb-threatening extremity sarcomas. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) has changed this situation completely. Now, ILP with TNF + melphalan is a very successful treatment to prevent amputation. In a multicenter European trial, ILP with TNF + melphalan resulted in a 76% response rate and a 71% limb salvage rate in patients with limb-threatening soft-tissue sarcomas, deemed unresectable by independent review committees, leading to approval of TNF in Europe. We have also reported on the success of this regimen against bulky melanomas, multifocal skin cancers, and drug-resistant bony sarcomas. High-dose TNF destructs tumor vasculature, and, most importantly, it enhances tumor-selective drug uptake (ie, melphalan and doxorubicin) by threefold to sixfold. Similar synergy is observed in well-vascularized liver metastases after isolated hepatic perfusion with TNF and melphalan. New (vasoactive) drugs and mechanisms of action and interaction with chemotherapy are in development. ILP is also a promising treatment modality for adenoviral vector-mediated gene therapy. Many clinical phase I/II evaluations in ILP are now underway.     

Repeat isolated limb perfusion with TNFalpha and melphalan for recurrent limb melanoma after failure of previous perfusion.

AIM: To assess the effectiveness of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) and melphalan for recurrent or persistent melanoma lesions after previous ILP. METHODS: Between 1978 and 2001, 21 patients (mean age 65, range 29-83 years) underwent repeat ILP for recurrent or persistent melanoma after a previous ILP. First ILPs had been performed with melphalan alone in 13 patients and with addition of TNFalpha in eight, for a median of nine lesions (interquartile (IQ) range 2-23 lesions). Repeat ILP was performed with TNFalpha and melphalan in all 21 patients for a median of nine lesions (IQ range 5-25 lesions). Median follow-up after repeat ILP was 18 months (IQ range 6-36 months). RESULTS: Thirteen patients attained a complete response (CR) after repeat ILP compared to 11 of 17 with measurable lesions after the first ILP. Nine patients relapsed after CR. Median limb recurrence-free survival was 13 months. Fourteen patients had mild acute regional toxicity after repeat ILP compared to 18 after the first ILP (n.s.). One patient underwent amputation for critical limb ischemia 10 months following repeat ILP. The limb salvage rate was 95%. Overall median survival was 62 months after CR compared to 13 months for those without CR (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: Repeat ILP with TNFalpha and melphalan is feasible after previous ILP with mild regional toxicity. The CR rate is relatively high and comparable to the first procedure with good limb recurrence-free survival and high limb salvage rate.     

Isolated limb perfusion for unresectable extremity sarcoma: results of 2 single-institution phase 2 trials

BACKGROUND:

Controversy has surrounded the role of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for unresectable extremity sarcomas. However, there remains a group of sarcoma patients for whom amputation is the only potential treatment. Because systemic therapies are limited, the authors evaluated ILP in an effort to provide a limb‐salvage option.

METHODS:

Since 1995, patients with unresectable extremity sarcomas were entered in 2 prospective trials using ILP. Study 1 used tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan in the perfusion circuit at hyperthermic temperatures (39‐41°C). Study 2 used doxorubicin at normothermic temperatures. All ILPs were performed using the standard, previously described technique.

RESULTS:

Seventeen patients were entered into study 1; there were 10 (58%) partial responses, 1 (6%) near complete response (CR), 1 (6%) CR, and 5 (30%) no response/minor response. Fourteen patients died of their disease, with a median follow‐up of 17 months. Seven (41%) patients maintained their limb intact until the time of death. Twelve patients were entered into study 2; there were no partial or CRs and 2 (20%) minor responses. With a median follow‐up of 35 months, there are 3 patients alive (2 with their extremity intact and 1 with an amputation). Six patients developed myonecrosis with creatine phosphokinase levels up to 54,000 U/dL.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although doxorubicin is active systemically, TNF and melphalan appear to have greater activity and less toxicity during ILP. Future clinical trials are needed to clearly identify the role for ILP in patients with unresectable extremity sarcomas. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Technology insight: Utility of TNF-alpha-based isolated limb perfusion to avoid amputation of irresectable tumors of the extremities

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan is effective in the treatment of small multiple melanoma intransit metastases and is utilized widely for this indication. The treatment is much less effective against bulky melanoma metastases and has uniformly failed in the treatment of irresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas. The addition of tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) to this treatment approach has changed the situation dramatically. High response rates and limb-salvage rates have been reported in multicenter trials that combined ILP with TNF-alpha plus melphalan; these trials resulted in the approval of TNF-alpha for bulky melanoma metastases and soft tissue sarcomas in Europe in 1998. Subsequently, many doctors working in European centers have been trained, and a series of confirmatory reports from single institutions have now been published regarding the efficacy of the procedure. TNF-alpha has an early and a late effect; it enhances tumor-selective drug uptake during the perfusion, and plays an essential role in the subsequent selective destruction of the tumor vasculature. These effects result in a high response rate in bulky tumors, soft tissue sarcomas, bulky melanomas, and various other tumor types. This induction therapy therefore allows tumor remnants to be resected some 3 months after ILP thus avoiding limb amputation. TNF-alpha-based ILP is a well-established treatment that aims to avoid amputations regardless of the tumor size and type. It represents an important example of combination therapy that modulates the tumor vasculature and should be offered in high-volume tertiary referral centers.     

Regional toxicity after isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor- alpha versus toxicity after melphalan alone.

AIMS: To determine whether the addition of high-dose tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan increases acute regional tissue toxicity compared to ILP with melphalan alone. METHODS: A retrospective, multivariate analysis of toxicity after normothermic (37--38 degrees C) and 'mild' hyperthermic (38--40 degrees C) ILPs for melanoma was undertaken. Normothermic ILP with melphalan was performed in 294 patients (70.8%), 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan in 71 patients (17.1%) and 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan combined with TNF alpha in 50 patients (12.0%). Toxicity was nil or mild (grades I--II according to Wieberdink et al.) in 339 patients (81.7%), and more severe acute regional toxicity (grades III--V) developed in 76 patients (18.3%). A stepwise logistic regression procedure was performed for the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for more severe toxicity. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan plus TNF alpha significantly increased the incidence of more severe acute regional toxicity compared to normothermic and 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan alone (36% vs 16% and 17%; P=0.0038). However, after ILP using TNF alpha no grade IV (compartment compression syndrome) or grade V (toxicity necessitating amputation) reactions were seen. Significantly more severe toxicity was seen after ILPs performed between 1991 and 1994 compared with earlier ILPs (33%vs 14%P=0.0001). Also, women had a higher risk of more severe toxicity than men (22% vs 7%; P=0.0007). After multivariate analysis, prognostic factors which remained significant were: sex (P=0.0013) and either ILP schedule (P=0.013) or treatment period (P=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Regional toxicity after 'mild' hyperthermic ILP with melphalan and TNF alpha was significantly increased compared to ILP with melphalan alone. This may be caused by increased thermal enhancement of melphalan due to the higher tissue temperatures (39--40 degrees C) at which the melphalan in the TNF alpha-ILPs was administered or by an interaction between high-dose TNF alpha and melphalan. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.     

The αVβ3/αVβ5 integrin inhibitor cilengitide augments tumor response to melphalan isolated limb perfusion in a sarcoma model

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α is used to treat bulky, locally advanced melanoma and sarcoma. However, TNF toxicity suggests a need for better‐tolerated drugs. Cilengitide (EMD 121974), a novel cyclic inhibitor of alpha‐V integrins, has both anti‐angiogenic and direct anti‐tumor effects and is a possible alternative to TNF in ILP. In this study, rats bearing a hind limb soft tissue sarcoma underwent ILP using different combinations of melphalan, TNF and cilengitide in the perfusate. Further groups had intra‐peritoneal (i.p.) injections of cilengitide or saline 2 hr before and 3 hr after ILP. A 77% response rate (RR) was seen in animals treated i.p. with cilengitide and perfused with melphalan plus cilengitide. The RR was 85% in animals treated i.p. with cilengitide and ILP using melphalan plus both TNF and cilengitide. Both RRs were significantly greater than those seen with melphalan or cilengitide alone. Histopathology showed that high RRs were accompanied by disruption of tumor vascular endothelium and tumor necrosis. Compared with ILP using melphalan alone, the addition of cilengitide resulted in a three to sevenfold increase in melphalan concentration in tumor but not in muscle in the perfused limb. Supportive in vitro studies indicate that cilengitide both inhibits tumor cell attachment and increases endothelial permeability. Since cilengitide has low toxicity, these data suggest the agent is a good alternative to TNF in the ILP setting.     

Isolated Limb Perfusion with Melphalan and TNF-α in the Treatment of Extremity Sarcoma

Opinion statement Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with chemotherapy alone has uniformly failed in the treatment of irresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas. The addition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) to this treatment approach contributed to a major step forward in the treatment of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). High response rates and limb salvage rates have been reported in multicenter trials, which combined ILP with TNF-α plus melphalan, which resulted in the approval of TNF-α for this indication in Europe in 1998. Subsequently a series of confirmatory single institution reports on the efficacy of the procedure have now been published. TNF-α has an early and a late effect; it enhances tumor-selective drug uptake during the perfusion and plays an essential role in the subsequent selective destruction of the tumor vasculature. These effects result in a high response rate in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas. This induction therapy thus allows for resection of tumor remnants some 3 months after ILP and thus avoidance of limb amputation. TNF-α-based ILP is a well-established treatment to avoid amputations. It represents an important example of tumor vasculatory-modulating combination therapy and should be offered in large volume tertiary referral centers.     

Isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan for unresectable bone sarcomas of the lower extremity.

AIMS: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with recombinant tumour necrosis factor-alpha (rTNF-alpha) and melphalan has recently been reported to induce major tumour responses and permit limb salvage in over 80% of patients with unresectable soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. We investigated whether TNF-based ILP could allow limb-sparing surgery in patients with primary, recurrent or metastatic bone sarcoma to the lower extremity who met the criteria for an amputation and had failed or refused chemotherapy. METHODS: From August 1992 to December 1997, we employed ILP with rTNF-alpha and melphalan in 13 patients with unresectable bone sarcoma of the lower extremity, all of whom were candidates for amputation. The aim was to reduce tumour size and allow the performance of a limb-sparing surgery (LSS). RESULTS: Following ILP, none of the patients had severe local toxicity and only one patient experienced significant systemic side-effects. LSS was subsequently performed in nine of the 13 patients. LSS was feasible in an additional three patients but was not performed because of the emergence of diffused metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: ILP with rTNF-alpha and melphalan can allow limb salvage in patients wih locally advanced bone sarcomas who had failed standard treatment options. Its potential role in the treatment of unresectable bone sarcomas of the extremities merits further evaluation.     

Outcomes of isolated limb perfusion in the treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review

Background

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) may provide a limb salvage option for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to local resection.

Methods

A systematic review was performed for studies reporting outcome of ILP for locally advanced STS performed after 1980 in patients aged ≥12 years old. The main endpoints were tumour response and limb salvage rates. Complication and recurrence rates were secondary endpoints.

Results

Eighteen studies were included, providing outcomes for 1030 patients. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha with melphalan was the commonest chemotherapy regime. When reported, 22% of cases achieved a complete tumour response (216/964, 15 studies) with an overall response rate of 72% (660/911, 15 studies). At median follow-up times ranging between 11 and 125 months, the limb salvage rate was 81% in patients who otherwise would have been subjected to amputation. However, 27% of patients suffered local recurrence and 40% suffered distant failure. ILP was associated with severe locoregional reactions in 4% (22/603) of patients. Amputation due to complications within 30 days was necessary in 1.2% of cases (7/586, nine studies). There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of ILP on survival.

Conclusion

ILP induces a high tumour response rate, leads to a high limb salvage rate but is associated with a high recurrence rate. It provides a limb salvage alternative to amputation when local control is necessary.     

Rapid increase in plasma tenascin-C concentration after isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interferon gamma (IFNγ) and melphalan for regionally advanced tumors

The matrix protein tenascin-C (TN-C) is present in the blood of healthy individuals at concentrations around 1 mg/1. Elevated serum levels have been reported in cancer patients. In this study we have measured the concentration of circulating TN-C in 40 patients with melanoma, soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) or squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the limbs, and have found a minor increase in the mean concentration compared with healthy subjects. Only 10 patients had TN-C levels above the normal range. No correlation was observed between TN-C levels and tumor burden. Nineteen patients were treated by isolation limb perfusion (ILP) with TNF, IFNγ, melphalan (11 melanoma, 2 SCC and 1 STS), melphalan alone (3 melanoma) or hyperthermia at 41.5°C (2 melanoma). ILP with TNF, IFNγ and melphalan induced a rapid increase in plasma TN-C levels, peaking in most patients between 24 to 48 hr after ILP. Two patients treated with hyperthermia only had a slow increase in TN-C concentration peaking at day 4, while the patients treated with melphalan alone had no significant change. In some cases elevated TN-C levels persisted for over 8 weeks after ILP. The early rise in TN-C concentration correlates with the increase in circulating C-reactive protein. Our findings suggest that circulating TN-C behaves, at least in part, as an acute-phase protein and that it may play a role in the inflammatory response. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Major amputation for intractable extremity melanoma after failure of isolated limb perfusion.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse indications and results of amputation for intractable extremity melanoma after failure of isolated limb perfusion (ILP). METHODS: Between 1978 and 2001, 451 patients with loco-regional advanced extremity melanoma underwent 505 ILPs. Amputation of the affected extremity had to be carried out for intractable recurrent disease in 11 of these patients. RESULTS: The indications for amputation were uncontrollable pain (n=2), extensive loco-regional tumour progression (n=4), loss of ankle function due to local tumour growth (n=1), and ulcerating and fungating lesions, not responding to other treatments (n=4). Four patients developed stump recurrence after amputation. Ten patients died of melanoma metastases after a median of 11 months (range 2-110 months). Two patients survived more than 5 years after amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Major amputation is rarely indicated for intractable extremity melanoma but long-term survival can be achieved in selected patients.     

Treatment modifications in tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF)-based isolated limb perfusion in patients with advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas

BackgroundTumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) and melphalan based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP) is an attractive treatment option for advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). This study reports on a 20-year single centre experience and discusses the evolution and changes in methodology since the introduction of TNF in ILP.Patients and methodsWe performed 306 TM-ILPs in 275 patients with extremity STS. All patients were candidates for amputation or mutilating surgery in order to achieve local control. Clinical response evaluation consisted of clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. To evaluate the importance of TNF-dose, treatment results of two periods (1991–2003 high dose (3–4 mg) TNF; 2003–2012 reduced dose (1–2 mg) TNF) were compared.ResultsDuring the study period, more femoral perfusions were done instead of iliac perfusions. Reduction of TNF dose and reduction of total ILP time did not lead to different clinical response rates (70% and 69% for periods 1 and 2 respectively) or different local recurrence rates, but was associated with less local toxicity (23% and 14% for periods 1 and 2 respectively). Hospital stay was significantly reduced during the study period. There was an improved pathological response in the high dose TNF group without consequences for clinical outcome.ConclusionTM-ILP remains a very effective treatment modality for limb threatening extremity STS. Moreover, reduction of dose and the growing experience in ILP led to less local toxicity and shorter hospital stay.     

Isolated Limb Perfusion for Malignant Melanoma: Systematic Review on Effectiveness and Safety

Background.

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) involves the administration of chemotherapy drugs directly into a limb involved by locoregional metastases. Unresectable locally advanced melanoma of the limbs represents one of the clinical settings in which ILP has demonstrated benefits.

Methods.

A systematic review of the literature on ILP for patients with unresectable locally advanced melanoma of the limbs was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database searches were conducted to identify studies fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: hyper- or normothermic ILP with melphalan with or without tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or other drugs providing valid data on clinical response, survival, or toxicity. To allocate levels of evidence and grades of recommendation the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network system was used.

Results.

Twenty-two studies including 2,018 ILPs were selected with a clear predominance of observational studies (90.90%) against experimental studies (9.10%). The median complete response rate to ILP was of 58.20%, with a median overall response rate of 90.35%. ILP with melphalan yielded a median complete response rate of 46.50%, against a 68.90% median complete response rate for melphalan plus TNF ILP. The median 5-year overall-survival rate was 36.50%, with a median overall survival interval of 36.70 months. The Wieberdink IV and V regional toxicity rates were 2.00% and 0.65%, respectively.

Conclusions.

ILP is effective in achieving clinical responses in patients with unresectable locally advanced melanoma of the limbs. The disease-free and overall survival rates provided by ILP are acceptable. ILP is safe, with a low incidence of severe regional and systemic toxicity.     

Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan,tumour necrosis factor‐alpha and oncolytic vaccinia virus improves tumour targeting and prolongs survival in a rat model of advanced extremity sarcoma

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment for advanced extremity sarcoma and in‐transit melanoma. Advancing this procedure by investigating the addition of novel agents, such as cancer‐selective oncolytic viruses, may improve both the therapeutic efficacy of ILP and the tumour‐targeted delivery of oncolytic virotherapy. Standard in vitro assays were used to characterise single agent and combinatorial activities of melphalan, tumour necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) and Lister strain vaccinia virus (GLV‐1h68) against BN175 rat sarcoma cells. An orthotopic model of advanced extremity sarcoma was used to evaluate survival of animals after ILP with combinations of TNF‐α, melphalan and GLV‐1h68. We investigated the efficiency of viral tumour delivery by ILP compared to intravenous therapy, the locoregional and systemic biodistribution of virus after ILP, and the effect of mode of administration on antibody response. The combination of melphalan and GLV‐1h68 was synergistic in vitro. The addition of virus to standard ILP regimens was well tolerated and demonstrated superior tumour targeting compared to intravenous administration. Triple therapy (melphalan/TNF‐α/GLV‐1h68) resulted in increased tumour growth delay and enhanced survival compared to other treatment regimens. Live virus was recovered in large amounts from perfused regions, but in smaller amounts from systemic organs. The addition of oncolytic vaccinia virus to existing TNF‐α/melphalan‐based ILP strategies results in survival advantage in an immunocompetent rat model of advanced extremity sarcoma. Virus administered by ILP has superior tumour targeting compared to intravenous delivery. Further evaluation and clinical translation of this approach is warranted.     

Long-term results of a double perfusion schedule using high dose hyperthermia and melphalan sequentially in extensive melanoma of the lower limb

The aim of this study was to assess the results of an isolated limb perfusion (ILP) schedule with high dose hyperthermia (42-43 degrees C) and melphalan, applied sequentially in patients with advanced melanoma of the limbs. Seventeen patients with extensive recurrent or bulky melanoma of a limb were treated with hyperthermic femoral ILP (42-43 degrees C) without drugs followed by normothermic (37-38 degrees C) ILP with melphalan. Eleven patients (65%) had a complete response. Three patients (27%) had limb recurrences after 5, 6 and 18 months, respectively. The 5 year limb recurrence-free interval for patients with a complete response was 63%. Limb toxicity was mild; pressure-related blistering and transient sensory disturbances occurred after the hyperthermic ILP, and 88% of the patients had a grade II reaction (mild erythema and oedema) after the second ILP. This sequential ILP schedule resulted in a high complete response rate and a low limb-recurrence rate in patients with extensive, recurrent melanoma of the limbs at the cost of only mild toxicity. This regimen could be an alternative to ILP with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan.     

Prognostic factors for survival after isolated limb perfusion for malignant melanoma

AIMS: Risk factors were determined for mortality within 1 year after isolated limb perfusion (ILP). METHODS: All of 439 patients who underwent ILP for melanoma of the extremities were studied. Ninety percent of the patients had MD Anderson stage IIB or III disease at the time of ILP. ILP was performed with melphalan with or without TNFalpha under mild hyperthermic (38-40 degrees C) or normothermic (37-38 degrees C) conditions in 80% of the cases. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients died within this period, 64 of metastatic melanoma. The indication for ILP was an unresectable primary (n=3), a local recurrence (n=24) or adjuvant to excision of primary lesions (n=17) in patients with stage IIIB regional lymph node metastases. These patients or patients with stage IIIAB melanoma with satellites and/or in-transit metastases with regional lymph node metastases had a relative risk of 4.6 (95% CI 2.0-6.6) and 3.6 (95% CI 2.1-10) of dying within 1 year from ILP, respectively (p<0.001). In patients with stage IV disease (distant metastases), the relative risk was 22 (95% CI 3.8-127, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced limb melanoma have an increased risk of death within 1 year after ILP when regional lymph node or distant metastases are present.     

Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor: an efficient agent for cancer treatment

Recombinant human TNF (rhTNF) has a selective effect on endothelial cells in tumour angiogenic vessels. Its clinical use has been limited because of its property to induce vascular collapsus. TNF administration through isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for regionally advanced melanomas and soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs was shown to be safe and efficient. When combined to the alkylating agent melphalan, a single ILP produces a very high objective response rate. ILP with TNF and melphalan provided the proof of concept that a vasculotoxic strategy combined to chemotherapy may produce a strong anti-tumour effect. The registered indication of TNF-based ILP is a regional therapy for regionally spread tumours. In soft tissue sarcomas, it is a limb sparing neoadjuvant treatment and, in melanoma in-transit metastases, a curative treatment. Despite its demonstrated regional efficiency TNF-based ILP is unlikely to have any impact on survival. High TNF dosages induce endothelial cells apoptosis, leading to vascular destruction. However, lower TNF dosage produces a very strong effect that is to increase the drug penetration into the tumour, presumably by decreasing the intratumoural hypertension resulting in better tumour uptake. TNF-ILP allowed the identification of the role of alphaVbeta3 integrin deactivation as an important mechanism of antiangiogenesis. Several recent studies have shown that TNF targeting is possible, paving the way to a new opportunity to administer TNF systemically for improving cancer drug penetration. TNF was the first agent registered for the treatment of cancer that improves drug penetration in tumours and selectively destroys angiogenic vessels.     

Isolated limb perfusion in the management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma

In conclusion, ILP is an interesting and important treatment option in the management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Large medical centers, dealing with referrals and an important caseload of STS patients, should develop this treatment option and have it readily available to offer patients the best chances for limb salvage. In Europe, the success of TNF-based ILP has lead to the training, accreditation, and activation of TNF-based ILP programs in over 30 cancer centers since the approval of TNF for this indication in 1999. Thus, country by country centers for referral programs are established to deal with those categories of patients that can greatly benefit from the availability and integration of this treatment option in the STS treatment programs.