The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Kujala score for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Purpose: To develop a Thai version of the Kujala score and show the evaluation of the validity and reliability of the score.

Method: The Thai version of the Kujala score was developed using the forward–backward translation protocol. The 49 PFPS patients answered the Thai version of questionnaires including the Kujala score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. The validity between the scores has been tested. The reliability was assessed using test–retest reliability and internal consistency.

Results: The Thai version of the Kujala score showed a good correlation with Thai IKDC Subjective Knee Form (Pearson’s correlation coefficient; r?=?0.74: p?r?=?0.586, 0.571 and 0.524, respectively: p?p?p?Conclusion: The Thai version of the Kujala score has shown good validity and reliability. This score can be effectively used for evaluating Thai patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Kujala score is a self-administered questionnaire for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).

• The validity and reliability of the Thai version of Kujala are compatible with other versions (Turkish, Chinese and Persian version).

• The Thai version of Kujala has been shown to have validity and reliability in Thai PFPS patients and can be used for clinical evaluation and also in the research work.

     

Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke

Purpose: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) into the Persian language and to test the reliability and validity of the Persian FIM (PFIM) in patients with stroke. Method: In this cross-sectional study carried out in an outpatient stroke rehabilitation center, 40 patients with stroke (mean age 60 years) were participated. A standard forward–backward translation method and expert panel validation was followed to develop the PFIM. Two experienced occupational therapists (OTs) assessed the patients independently in all items of the PFIM in a single session for inter-rater reliability. One of the OTs reassessed the patients after 1 week for intra-rater reliability. Results: There were no floor or ceiling effects for the PFIM. Excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was noted for the PFIM total score, motor and cognitive subscales (ICC_agreement 0.88–0.98). According to the Bland–Altman agreement analysis, there was no systematic bias between raters and within raters. The internal consistency of the PFIM was with Cronbach's alpha from 0.70 to 0.96. The principal component analysis with varimax rotation indicated a three-factor structure: (1) self-care and mobility; (2) sphincter control and (3) cognitive that jointly accounted for 74.8% of the total variance. Construct validity was supported by a significant Pearson correlation between the PFIM and the Persian Barthel Index (r?=?0.95; p?Conclusions: The PFIM is a highly reliable and valid instrument for measuring functional status of Persian patients with stroke.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is an outcome measure for disability based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

• The FIM was cross-culturally adapted and validated into Persian language.

• The Persian version of the FIM (PFIM) is reliable and valid for assessing functional status of patients with stroke.

• The PFIM can be used in Persian speaking countries to assess the limitations in activities of daily living of patients with stroke.

     

Further validation of the Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy Scale

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the factorial and construct validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy (MSSE) Scale in two samples of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Method: Two samples (n's?=?292, 275) of participants with MS were recruited from across the United States. Participants in both studies completed a questionnaire battery that included the MSSE and measures of symptoms, dysfunction, disability, psychosocial aspects, mental/emotional well-being, and quality of life. Factorial validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), whereas construct validity was examined based on bivariate correlations with scores from other measures. Results: The two-factor measurement model provided a poor fit for the 18 items on the MSSE in both the samples. This model provided a good fit for a modified, 10-item scale in both samples. The 10-item version of the MSSE was highly correlated with the original MSSE (r?=?0.97, p?<?0.001) and related constructs (e.g. disability, r?=?0.69, p?<?0.0001). The standardized Cronbach's αs of the two subscales (function and control) of the 10-item version ranged between 0.78 and 0.94 for both samples. Conclusions: Scores from the modified, 10-item version of the MSSE provide a valid and reliable measure of MS-specific self-efficacy among persons with MS.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The importance of self-efficacy in managing the consequences of multiple sclerosis (MS) has increased.

• The Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy (MSSE) Scale was developed and validated for measuring self-efficacy in function maintenance and control over MS from patients' perspectives. In the past almost 20 years, this scale has not undergone additional validation of its factor structure and construct validity in large-scale samples of persons with MS.

• The original two-factor construct did not provide a good fit for the 18 items on the MSSE in two independent samples. We modified the MSSE and found the 10 items fitted by the two-factor construct well with one sample and demonstrated cross-validity of the 10 items in the second sample.

• The 10-item version of the MSSE has good reliability and construct validity in both independent samples. Researchers and clinicians should adopt these 10 items when examining MS self-efficacy of patients.

     

The psychometric properties of the cervical nonorganic signs in patients with neck pain: an assessment of pain expression

Purpose: Neck pain is a common cause of disability. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the cervical nonorganic signs (CNOS), a tool for assessing abnormal illness behaviors in patients with neck pain.

Methods: The CNOS was administered on patients with neck pain. Reliability and validity analyses were used to evaluate the psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis was used to investigate the dimensionality. Correlations with the Short Form-36 were used to investigate the convergent validity.

Results: The results supported the reliability (inter-rater reliability intra-class correlation: 0.920), validity (correlated with body pain (|ρ|=0.31) and vitality (|ρ|?=0.30), and two-factor dimensionality (χ²=^?5.904, p=?0.66; χ²/df?=?0.738; RMSEAConclusion: The CNOS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing pain and vitality problems. It helps patients to express severe pain and lack of vitality. The rehabilitation discipline could use the scale to understand pain expression and to design proper rehabilitation programs.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The cervical nonorganic signs has two domains (pain and vitality).

• The scale is reliable and valid for patients with neck pain.

• Patients with high scores on the pain domain have severe body pain that may interfere with normal social activities.

• Clinicians should understand their suffering and try to help them to alleviate the pain.

     

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Persian version of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) short form

Abstract

Objective: To test the psychometric specifications of the Persian version of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) short form in an Iranian population. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Fifty-two individuals with a mean age of 49.3 years (SD 7.9, minimum 38 years and maximum 80 years), who had chronic spinal cord lesions, were included in this study. Most of them were paraplegic (88.5%) and unemployed (76.9%). Methods: Reliability (internal consistency) of the measure was examined by applying Cronbach’s alpha. In addition, validity (construct) was tested by Pearson’s correlation. Results: Overall, the internal consistency of the questionnaire was found to be satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha 0.613). Regarding construct validity, the minimum and maximum significant correlations were among Physical Component Summery and Cognitive Independence (r?=?0.267, p?<?0.05), Vitality and Social Integration (r?=??0.429, p?<?0.01) respectively. Conclusion: By analyzing data regarding the psychometric specifications of the Persian version of CHART, we can conclude that this version is a valid, reliable and unique measure that can be used for spinal cord–injured individuals. As demonstrated in our preliminary study, it is easy to be filled out and is not confusing.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Persian version of the CHART has been successfully validated.

• It can be used by those working specifically in the field of spinal cord injury and also more generally.

• It will enable both initial assessment and follow-up for people in Persian-speaking areas of the world.

     

Measuring static seated pressure distributions and risk for skin pressure ulceration in ice sledge hockey players

Purpose: To determine whether sledge hockey players with physical disability have higher average seated pressures compared to non-disabled controls. Method: Fifteen age-matched controls without physical disability and 15 experimental participants with physical disability were studied using a pressure mapping device to determine risk for skin pressure ulceration and the impact of cushioning and knee angle positioning on seated pressure distributions. Results: Regardless of participant group, cushioning, or knee angle, average seated pressures exceeded clinically acceptable seated pressures. Controls had significantly higher average seated pressures than the disability group when knees were flexed, both with the cushion (p?=?0.013) and without (p?=?0.015). Knee extension showed significantly lower average pressures in controls, both with the cushion (p?<?0.001) and without (p?<?0.001). Placement of the cushion resulted in significantly lower average pressure in controls when knees were extended (p?=?0.024) but not when flexed (p?=?0.248). Placement of the cushion resulted in no difference in pressure (p?=?0.443) in the disability group. Conclusions: Pressures recorded indicate high risk for skin ulceration. Cushioning was effective only in the control group with knees extended. That knee extension significantly lowered average seated pressures is important, as many sledge hockey players utilize positioning with larger knee flexion angles.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Ice sledge hockey is a fast growing adaptive sport.

• Adaptive sports have been associated with several positive improvements in overall health and quality of life, though may be putting players at risk for skin ulceration.

• Measured static seated pressure in sledges greatly exceeds current clinically accepted clinical guidelines.

• With modern improvements in wheelchair pressure relief/cushioning there are potential methods for improvement of elevated seated pressure in ice hockey sledges.

     

First episode of acute low back pain – an exploratory cluster analysis approach for early detection of unfavorable recovery

Purpose: To identify recovery patterns in patients with a first episode of acute low back pain (LBP) and to define risk factors for unfavorable outcome.

Methods: One hundred and eight patients (55 male, 53 female; mean age?=?40.8, SD 14.2 years) rated pain (NRS) and disability [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] before the first treatment and 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months later. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified recovery patterns based on NRS data. Clusters were compared for age, NRS and ODI at baseline, pain reduction in the first week, gender, radicular signs and traumatic onset using one-way ANOVA (post hoc Bonferroni) and χ² tests.

Results: The cluster analysis revealed four clusters: moderate baseline pain/fast recovery; high baseline pain/fast recovery; high baseline pain/persistent mild pain; high baseline pain/persistent high pain. These clusters differed in baseline NRS [F(3,104)?=?39.61, p?F(3,104)?=?12.17, p?F(3,104)?=?11.51, p?χ²(3)?=?9.20, p?=?0.027].

Conclusions: These results suggest that an initial and regularly repeated assessment of pain intensity and functional disability is important. Initial pain intensity does not seem to be a prognostic factor per se, as it did not negatively affect recovery provided that it decreased early in treatment.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Prediction of outcome is particularly important in patients with a first episode of acute LBP as one third did not completely recover.

• Pain intensity and functional disability should be initially assessed and regularly repeated in the first phase of treatment.

• High initial pain intensity and disability combined with small pain reduction during the first week might predict unfavorable outcome and require adequate treatment.

     

Reliability,validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the Disability of Arm,Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic)

Purpose: To investigate the psychometric properties (reliability, validity and responsiveness) of the DASH-Arabic in a cohort of Arabic patients presenting with various upper extremity conditions.

Methods: Participants were 139 patients with various upper extremity conditions, who completed the DASH-Arabic at the baseline, 2–5 days later and 30–36 days later. Participants completed demographic data forms, the SF-36 and VAS at baseline, and a Global Rating of Change scale at first and second follow-ups.

Results: Cronbach’s alpha of the DASH-Arabic was 0.94. Test–retest reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.97. The SEM was 3.50 and the MDC₉₅ was 9.28. Construct validity of the DASH-Arabic with the SF-36 subscales and VAS scores ranged from r??0.32 to??0.57, all statistically significant (p?CI?=?0.72–0.92, p?Conclusions: The DASH-Arabic is a reliable, valid and responsive upper extremity outcome measure for patients whose primary language is Arabic; it can be used to document patient status and outcomes and support evidence-based practice.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The DASH-Arabic demonstrated sound psychometric properties of reliability, validity and responsiveness.

• It is an effective patient status and outcome tool that will support evidence-based practice.

• This tool is recommended for evaluating upper extremity work-related injuries and tracking therapeutic outcomes.

     

Participation in life situations by persons with systemic sclerosis

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the frequency of participation in life situations. Methods: A sample of 83 persons with systemic sclerosis (SSc) completed questionnaires regarding the presence and severity of disease symptoms, disability [the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], depression [the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)], and participation [the Adelaide Activities Profile (AAP)]. On the AAP, individuals rate the frequency of participation in four domains: domestic chores, household maintenance, service to others and social activities. Results: Participants were predominantly female, married, educated, white, and had diffuse SSc. Mean age was 53.7 years and mean disease duration was 9.9 years. On the AAP, participation was significantly more frequent for domestic chores than for household maintenance, service to others, and social activities. More fatigue (p?<?0.05), disability (p?<?0.001), and fatigue (p?<?0.05) resulted in lower total AAP scores. More fatigue, pain, severe gastrointestinal symptoms, and depression related to lower household maintenance scores, while the presence of ulcers and more disability and depression were associated with lower domestic chores scores. Conclusions: Participation in life situations in persons with SSc is related to higher disability, depression, and severity of disease symptoms. Interventions to address the disability, depression and symptoms may increase participation.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• People with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have restrictions in participation including domestic chores, household maintenance, service to others compared to a normative sample.

• For practitioners, these findings show the need to assess participation in addition to impairments and activity limitations in persons with SSc.

• The Adelaide Activities Profile could be used to measure participation.

• Our findings also suggest that interventions addressing fatigue, disability and depression, may improve participation.

     

Translation,cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of COOP/WONCA charts in Persian-speaking Iranians with multiple sclerosis

Purpose: Translation, cross-culturally adaptation and validation of a Persian version of COOP/WONCA charts in Persian-speaking Iranians with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Method: The Persian version of COOP/WONCA charts was developed after a standard forward translation, synthesis and backward translation. A total of 197 subjects with MS participated in this study. They were asked to complete the COOP/WONCA charts and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The COOP/WONCA charts were re-administered to 50 patients, 4 weeks after the first session. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was also scored for each subject by the referring physician. Construct validity was assessed by testing linear relationship between corresponding domains of the COOP/WONCA charts, the SF-36 and the EDSS. Test–retest reliability was examined using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values.

Results: Related domains of COOP/WONCA charts and SF-36 demonstrated strong linear relationships with Spearman’s coefficients ranging from ?0.51 to ?0.75 (pp0.70) except for feelings and quality-of-life domains that were 0.50 and 0.51, respectively.

Conclusions: The Persian version of the COOP/WONCA charts was shown to be psychometrically appropriate to evaluate the functional level and quality of life in Persian-speaking Iranians with MS.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• COOP/WONCA charts are now available in Persian and demonstrate good psychometric properties.

• COOP/WONCA charts demonstrate excellent reliability and construct validity in a Persian-speaking Iranian population with MS.

• Minimal detectable change in COOP/WONCA is now available in MS to guide within and between group analyses.

• Knowledge on a wide variety of physical, mental and emotional parameters as well as the status of patients’ symptoms, daily activities and quality of life helps rehabilitation clinicians and service providers plan preventive and remedial interventions more effectively.

     

Transcultural adaptation and validation of Hindi version of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale

Abstract

Purpose: To transculturally adapt the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale for Hindi-speaking population and examine its psychometric properties in patients with low back pain.

Materials and methods: The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Hindi following international guidelines. Hindi version of the scale was completed by 120 patients with low back pain and 60 healthy controls. Patients with low back pain were also administered the Hindi-Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale. Psychometric evaluation included test–retest reliability, convergent and discriminative validity. Exploratory factor analysis was carried out to determine the factor structure.

Results: The factorial analysis revealed a four-factor solution (bending/carrying, ambulation/reach, prolonged postures and rest). Convergent validity was confirmed by high correlation of Hindi Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale to the Hindi version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (r?=?0.77 and p?<?0.001) as well as Visual Analog Scale (r?=?0.682 and p?<?0.001) scores. Discriminative validity was established by significantly different scores for patients with low back pain and the healthy controls (35.36?±?18.6 vs. 9.13?±?6.08 and p?<?0.001). The translated version of the scale showed remarkable internal consistency (Cronbach α?=?0.98) and the intraclass correlation coefficient of test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC_2,1=0.96). MDC₉₅ and SEM scores obtained were 10.28 and 3.71, respectively.

Conclusion: The Hindi version of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale has good test–retest reliability, discriminative and convergent validity and is appropriate for clinical and research use in Hindi-speaking low back pain patients.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• Linguistically and culturally adapted questionnaires help researchers make adequate inferences about instruments measuring health and quality of life.

• The translated version would serve as a valid research tool allowing comparability of data across cultures thus, providing opportunities for large multicenter, multicountry trials.

• A Hindi Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale version will help to improve the quality and efficacy of assessment of low back pain by developing in patients, a better understanding of the items which can be easily correlated with the activities of daily living.

     

Reliability,validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of Shoulder Activity Scale in a group of patients with shoulder disorders

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this methodological study was to cross-culturally translate the Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS) into the Persian and determine its clinimetric properties including reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with shoulder disorders. Method: Persian version of the SAS was obtained after standard forward-backward translation. Three questionnaires were completed by the respondents: SAS, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The patients completed the SAS, 1 week after the first visit to evaluate the test–retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the associations between the scores on the SAS and the scores obtained from the SPADI, SF-36, and age of the patients. To assess responsiveness, data were collected in the first visit and then again after 4 weeks physiotherapy intervention. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. To evaluate construct validity, Spearman’s rank correlation was used. The ability of the SAS to detect changes was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristics method. Results: No problem or language difficulties were reported during translation process. Test–retest reliability of the SAS was excellent with an ICC of 0.98. Also, the marginal Cronbach’s alpha level of 0.64 was obtained. The correlation between the SAS and the SPADI was low, proving divergent validity, whereas the correlations between the SAS and the SF-36/age were moderate proving convergent validity. A marginally acceptable responsiveness was achieved for the Persian SAS. Conclusions: The study provides some evidences to support the test–retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of the SAS in patients with shoulder disorders. Therefore, it seems that this instrument is a useful measure of shoulder activity level in research setting and clinical practice.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The shoulder activity scale (SAS) is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of shoulder activity level in Persian-speaking patients with different shoulder disorders.

• The results on clinimetric properties of the Persian SAS are comparable with its original, English version.

• Persian version of the SAS can be used in “clinical” and “research” settings of patients with shoulder disorders.

     

The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: a caregiver administered dyphagia-specific outcome instrument for children

Purpose: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Pediatric version of the caregiver administered Eating Assessment Tool.

Methods: The study included developmental phase and reported content, criterion validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool. Literature review and the original Eating Assessment Tool were used for line-item generation. Expert consensus assessed the items for content validity over two Delphi rounds. Fifty-one healthy children to obtain normative data and 138 children with cerebral palsy to evaluate test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and criterion validity were included. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to assess criterion validity.

Results: All items were found to be necessary. Content validity index was 0.91. The mean score of Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool for healthy children and children with cerebral palsy was 0.26?±?1.83 and 19.5?±?11, respectively. The internal consistency was high with Cronbach’s alpha =0.87 for test and retest. An excellent correlation between the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool and Penetration-Aspiration score for liquid and pudding swallowing was found (p?r?=?0.77; p?r?=?0.83, respectively). A score >4 demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.3% and specificity of 98.8% to predict penetration/aspiration.

Conclusions: The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool was shown to be a valid and reliable tool to determine penetration/aspiration risk in children.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• The pediatric eating assessment tool: a new dyphagia-specific outcome survey for children.

• The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool is a dysphagia specific, parent report outcome instrument to determine penetration/aspiration risk in children.

• The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool has good internal consistency, test–retest reliability and criterion-based validity.

• The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool may be utilized as a clinical instrument to assess the need for further instrumental evaluation of swallowing function in children.

     

The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: Italian translation,adaptation, and validation of the short form

Objective: We developed an Italian version of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for Manual Users-Short Form (WheelCon-M-I-short form) and examined its reliability and validity.

Methods: The original scale was translated from English to Italian using the “Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures–Principles of Good Practice” guidelines. The WheelCon-M-I-short form was administered to experienced manual wheelchair users who had a variety of diagnoses. Its internal consistency and test–retest reliability were examined. Its concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Italian version of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM-I) and the Italian version of the Barthel index (BI).

Results: The WheelCon-M-I-short form was administered to 31 subjects. The mean?±?SD of the WheelCon-M-I-short form score was 7.5?±?1.9. All WheelCon-M-I-short form items were either identical or similar in meaning to the WheelCon-M-short form items. Cronbach’s α for the WheelCon-M-I-short form was 0.95 (p?p?p?p?Conclusions: The WheelCon-M-I-short form was found to be reliable and a valid outcome measure for assessing manual wheelchair confidence in the Italian population.

• Implication for Rehabilitation

• The WheelCon-M-I-short form is a valid outcome measure available for assessing wheelchair confidence, according to Bandura’s social cognitive theory, self-efficacy is a better predictor of future behavior than skill itself.

• Translation of the WheelCon-M-short form into the WheelCon-M-I-short form provides a new tool for Italian professionals.

• Clinicians now have a method to measure this invisible barrier to wheelchair use, and they will be able to make informed decisions when prescribing the use of manual wheelchairs and when training clients in their use.

• The WheelCon-M-I-short form also provides researchers with a tool in an important and relevant area of study for future research.

     

Association between muscle power impairment and WHODAS 2.0 in older adults with physical disability in Taiwan

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the association between muscle power impairment and each World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule second edition (WHODAS 2.0) domain score among subjects with physical disability. Methods: Subjects (≥60 years) with physical disability related to neurological diseases, including 730 subjects with brain disease (BD) and 126 subjects with non-BD, were enrolled from a data bank of persons with disabilities from 1 July 2011 to 29 February 2012. Standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores ranging from 0 (least difficulty) to 100 (greatest difficulty) points were calculated for each domain. Results: More than 50% of subjects with physical disability had the greatest difficulty in household activities and mobility. Muscle power impairment (adjusted odds ratios range among domains, 2.75–376.42, p?<?0.001), age (1.38–4.81, p?<?0.05), and speech impairment (1.94–5.80, p?<?0.05) were associated with BD subjects experiencing the greatest difficulty in most WHODAS 2.0 domains. But a few associated factors were identified for the non-BD group in the study. Conclusions: Although the patterns of difficulty in most daily activities were similar between the BD and non-BD groups, factors associated with the difficulties differed between those two groups. Muscle power impairment, age and speech impairment were important factors associated with difficulties in subjects with BD-related physical disability.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Older adults with physical disability often experience difficulties in household activities and mobility.

• Muscle power impairment is associated with difficulties in daily life in subjects with physical disability related to brain disease.

• Those subjects with brain disease who had older age, a greater degree of muscle power impairment, and the presence of speech impairment were at higher risk of experiencing difficulties in most daily activities.

     

Activities of daily living in people with lower limb amputation: outcomes of an intervention to reduce dependence in pre-prosthetic phase

Purpose: The main objective was to assess the change in the functional independence in basic activities of daily living (ADL) following a pre-prosthetic intervention in people with lower-limb amputation (LLA). Secondary objectives were to identify the factors contributing to the success of this intervention, and to analyze the effects on the presence of unmet needs for home adaptation.

Method: The ADL intervention was early and pre-prosthetic; it was focused on six self-care activities. Fifty-two adults with LLA, who required assistance in self-care, were included. Functional independence (Barthel) was assessed at baseline and after intervention (T2). Successful intervention was defined as independent performance of all self-care activities.

Results: There was a significant improvement in Barthel scores between baseline and T2 in toileting (p?p?p?p?p?=?0.025). The proportion of homes with an unmet need for adaptation decreased significantly in bathroom (p?=?0.008) and other internal areas (p?=?0.031). Intervention was successful for 61.5% of participants. In a multivariate model, age was significantly associated with successful intervention (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.52–0.83).

Conclusions: A short and pre-prosthetic ADL intervention improves functional independence and reduces the need for home adaptation. ADL programs should be included in rehabilitation strategies.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Because basic activities of daily living (ADL) can be seriously compromised after a lower-limb amputation, it is important for this population to improve or maintain their level of independence.

• A short and pre-prosthetic ADL intervention is an effective method for an early recovery of functional independence in self-care activities and promotes home adaptation.

• Age is an important determinant of functional recovery, and most subjects can achieve independence in basic ADL regardless of the level of amputation.

• A pre-prosthetic ADL program should be included in rehabilitation strategies for adults with lower-limb amputation.

     

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and physical functioning: an exploration of associations between self-reported measures and physical performance tests

Background: Degenerative spinal stenosis is a common lumbar condition in the elderly population. Clinical decision-making in the physiotherapy settings is based on assessments of the patients physical status. The purpose of this study was to examine how self-reported measures on symptoms and physical function relate to responses on physical performance tests.

Methods: A total of 103 patients with LSS completed a comprehensive questionnaire and physical performance tests (functional leg-strength and dynamic balance). Associations between the subscales Symptom Severity (SYMP) and Physical Function (FUNC) from the Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, and the performance tests were examined. Univariate correlation and multivariable linear regression analyses were applied.

Results: The associations between SYMP or FUNC and the performance tests were moderate (?0.3?p?p?R²?=?0.31 and R²?=?0.38).

Conclusions: The present study indicates that both self-reported symptoms and walking limitation are associated with leg strength, while only symptoms are associated with balance. The results suggest that a combination of simple performance tests will add information needed to map the patients disability and guide interventions.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• One-leg-standing, 30-s sit-to-stand and stair climb test are easy to use and applicable for examining physical function in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

• Simple performance tests add information needed to map the patients’ disability and guide interventions.

• Leg strength is a key factor for both symptoms and walking ability. Also, balance is of importance for the symptoms in LSS patients.

     

Validity of the single limb heel raise test to predict lower extremity disablement in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the validity of the single limb heel raise (SLHR) test as a potential screening tool to detect lower extremity disability in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). Methods: We compared gait speed and fall history between subjects with sIBM who either could complete one SLHR (SLHR group) or could not complete one SLHR. Discriminative validity was established by comparing between group differences in functional measures based on group assignment. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was used to determine the predictive validity of completing one repetition on the SLHR test. Spearman correlations were used to determine the association between gait kinematics and number of repetitions achieved on the SLHR test. Results: Forty-three subjects (13 females) were studied. The SLHR group (n?=?21) showed significantly greater gait speed (p?<?0.001) and decreased gait aid use (p?<?0.05) compared to the no SLHR group (n?=?22). SLHR cut scores of 1, 20, and 22 repetitions maximized positive likelihood ratios (+LR) for the ability to walk at 54.9 (+LR. 2.2), 63.2 (+LR. 9.5), and 73.1?m/min (+LR. 5.0), respectively. Conclusion: The SLHR test demonstrates adequate discriminative and predictive validity as a screening tool for lower extremity disablement in patients with sIBM.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The SLHR test has adequate reliability and validity to screen for the presence of lower extremity disablement in patients with sIBM.

• Results of this rapid field test may be used to guide the need for rehabilitation services to mitigate the effects of slow gait speeds in patients with sIBM.

     

History of violence and subjective health of mother and child

Objective: To study the self-reported prevalence of experienced violence among a cohort of women about two years after giving birth, their health during pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes and their experience of their child’s health.

Setting and subjects: In 2011, a total of 657 women participated in phase III of the Childbirth and Health Cohort Study in Icelandic Primary Health Care, 18 to 24 months after delivery. The women had previously participated in phase I around pregnancy week 16 and phase II 5–6 months after delivery. Data were collected by postal questionnaires.

Main outcome measures: Women’s reported history of experienced violence, sociodemographic and obstetric background, self-perceived health, the use of medications and their child’s perceived health.

Results: In phase III, 16% of women reported experiencing violence. These women felt less support from their current partner (p?p?p?p?p?p?=?0.008).

Conclusions: Our study confirms that a history of violence is common among women. A history of violence is associated with various maternal health problems during and after pregnancy, a higher rate of caesarean sections and maternal reports of health problems in their child 18–24 months after birth.

• KEY POINTS

• Violence is a major concern worldwide. Understanding the impact of violence on human health and developing effective preventive measures are important elements of any public health agenda.

• ??The reported prevalence of experiencing violence was 16% among women attending antenatal care in the primary health care setting in Iceland.

• ??Women with a history of violence reported worse health in general during pregnancy and delivered more often by caesarean section, compared to women with no such history.

• ??Mothers with a history of violence also evaluated the general health of their child as worse than women with no such history.

• ??The findings of this study support the importance of recognizing and addressing experienced violence among women in primary care.