内耳畸形小儿人工耳蜗植入术后电极阻抗测试的研究

目的探讨内耳畸形小儿人工耳蜗植入手术后,植入体电极阻抗值的变化特点及规律。方法对36例澳大利亚Cochlear Nucleus 24型内耳畸形小儿人工耳蜗植入手术患儿,测试手术中及手术后1年阻抗值,并分析其特点及变化规律。结果患儿术中及开机后1年内高中低频段电极阻抗值变化趋势相同。电极阻抗值术中自开机显著增大,术中阻抗值最低,开机达到最大值,其后呈下降趋势,于开机3月后趋于平稳。结论内耳畸形小儿人工耳蜗植入手术后电极阻抗值开机3个月内变化明显,故需多次调机,以使患者语言感知达到最佳状态。     

人工耳蜗植入术后电极阻抗特性分析

目的对使用人工耳蜗系统患者的电极阻抗数值进行分析,总结电极阻抗的变化规律,为临床制定合理的术后调试计划提供依据。方法对152位使用澳大利亚Cochlear Nucleus24M型人工耳蜗系统的患者于术后4周左右安装体外设备并进行测试,使用澳大利亚Cochlear公司提供的R116或R126软件进行电极阻抗测试。结果患者电极阻抗数值自术中至术后开机时呈显著增加的趋势,在开机时达到最大,其后随开机时间的增长显著降低,至开机3个月后趋于稳定,不同部位的电极显示了相同的变化趋势。结论电极阻抗数值随术后使用时间及电极部位的变化而变化。在开机3个月内需多次进行调试,从而为患者提供最适合的程序,使患者的言语感知达到最佳状态。     

Nucleus人工耳蜗弯电极和直电极植入后的心理物理指标比较

目的对比Nucleus CI 24导Contour弯电极与Nucleus CI 24导直电极植入后的电阻阻抗、刺激阈值和舒适阈。方法植入澳大利亚NucleuS人工耳蜗的患者分为2组,1组（19例）植入Nucleus CI 24导Contour电极阵列（弯电极）,另1组（11例）植入CI 24M电极阵列（直电极）。所有患者耳蜗植入术后15天开机调试,并于开机时及开机后1周、1月、3月分别记录各电极的电阻、刺激闽值和最大舒适阈。结果开机后由于Nucleus 24直电极的刺激阈值呈上升趋势,3月和6月时弯电极的阈值明显低于直电极阈值,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。开机1周、1月和6月2组的舒适阈接近。开机后弯电极和直电极的电阻值接近。结论Nucleus CI 24导Contour弯电极的刺激阈值稳定,刺激阈和舒适阈之间动态范围较宽。     

神经反应遥测技术在人工耳蜗植入术中的应用

目的 探讨人工耳蜗植入术中神经反应遥测(neural response telemetry，NRT)技术的应用情况。方法 对10例Nucleus CI24M及4例Nucleus CI24R(CS)人工耳蜗植入术的患儿在术中及术后一个月进行NRT检测，比较两者术中和术后的电诱发复合动作电位(electrically-evoked compound action potential，ECAP)阈值差异，并利用术中ECAP阈值指导首个言语处理器映射图。结果 14例患儿术中各电极的ECAP平均阈值均高于术后一个月开机时相应电极的ECAP平均阈值，CI24M植入体各电极的术中ECAP阈值比术后相应电极的ECAP阈值平均高11CL；术中10个电极相应的ECAP波形采集只需5分钟；术后开机整个过程约1小时。结论 术中应用NRT技术可快捷地了解植入体安置的情况，指导术后首个映射图的调试，明显节省了术后开机调试的时间，操作简单、方便，值得推广。     

Nucleus 24CA型人工耳蜗植入后电极阻抗及T/C值变化分析

目的观察Nucleus 24CA型人工耳蜗植入后电极阻抗、行为反应阈值(T-level,T级)及最大舒适级(C-level,C级)的变化规律,分析其内在联系,探讨其对术后调机的指导意义。方法对81例植入Nucleus 24CA型人工耳蜗患儿,分别在术中、术后1、2、6个月进行电极阻抗阈值测试,收集术后对应T、C值,并对其变化规律及相关性进行统计学分析。结果电极阻抗值术中检测最低,术后1月开机最高,此后逐渐减低(P<0.01);自蜗顶至蜗底各通道间电极阻抗值无显著差异(P>0.05)。各电极通道T值、C值随术后时间延长逐渐增高(P<0.05),并与电极阻抗值呈线性相关。结论测定电极阻抗值是评估人工耳蜗刺激电极状态的有效手段;术后2月应同时调试T值及C值,此后则应对C值进行重点调试。     

Nucleus24M型人工耳蜗植入后电极阻抗的变化

目的：研究人工耳蜗植入后电极阻抗的变化规律，以便确定术后进行映射调图的时间表。方法：对16例植入Nucleus CI24M型人工耳蜗患者，于术中及术后1、1．5、2、4、6个月进行电极阻抗测试，统计分析电极阻抗的变化规律。结果：患者电极阻抗在术中检测时最低，开机时最高，以后若干次随访时，阻抗逐渐下降，并在2～4个月左右趋于稳定。结论：电极阻抗的稳定提示耳蜗内生物组织的病理过程渐趋稳定；对心理物理测试配合良好的患者，术后只进行2～4个月左右的映射调图即可。     

368例人工耳蜗植入手术分析

目的探讨人工耳蜗植入手术的操作程序,以提高手术效率及手术安全性。方法回顾性分析人工耳蜗植入手术368例,手术均采用经后鼓室径路。术中行电极阻抗测试和神经反应遥测,术后拍耳蜗位X线平片判断电极植入情况,术后一个月开机调试及跟踪随访。结果所有患者电极全部顺利植入,人工耳蜗装置工作状态正常。术后3天1例出现迟发型面瘫,用激素保守治疗后逐渐恢复,术后45天1例患儿发生外耳道炎,术后2个月1例出现乳突及耳后骨膜下脓肿,术后7个月1例由于头部外伤致植入体损坏更换植入体,经积极处理后均恢复良好。全部病例术后随访24个月无永久性面瘫、植入体移位及脑膜炎等严重并发症发生,但术后4年3例患儿出现植入体外露合并皮肤感染。结论熟练掌握手术技巧并根据个体特点进行人工耳蜗植入手术对于提高植入成功率、重建听觉、减少手术并发症有着非常重要的意义,术后的长期随访甚至终生随访是必要的。     

直电极与弯电极序列人工耳蜗植入深度的比较

目的测量比较Nucleus CI 24M直电极序列和CI24 Contour弯电极序列两种型号植入体的电极植入深度。方法对41例CI 24M和8例CI 24 Contour植入者,术后拍摄耳蜗位X线平片。应用图像处理技术,比照耳蜗螺旋模板,建立电极序列的极坐标图形,测量第22号电极与耳蜗开窗处的极坐标角度,两者之差代表了电极序列的植入深度。以t检验比较两种型号植入体的植入深度状况。结果 无内耳畸形、手术条件相当的情况下,CI 24 Contour植入体的平均插入角度为413°,CI 24M植入体的平均插入角度为316°,P=0.0001。结论CI 24 Contour植入体的植入深度明显深于CI 24M。前者更有利于医师进行植入。     

儿童人工耳蜗植入术后神经反应遥测阈值的变化

目的:通过对儿童患者术后神经反应遥测 (NRT) 阈值的分析,总结其变化规律,为儿童人工耳蜗植入术后调试提供帮助.方法:测试40例接受Nucleus CI24R 型多导人工耳蜗单侧植入术的患儿.测试使用澳大利亚Cochlear公司提供的便携式调试系统及NRT3.1版本软件.采用削减算法提取NRT反应波形,分别测试每位患者的第1、5、10、15、20号电极,NRT阈值使用NRT软件计算.分别在开机时、开机3、6和12个月时进行测试.结果:在术后同一测试时间,位于耳蜗不同部位电极的NRT阈值存在差异.耳蜗底部和顶部电极的NRT阈值较低,而位于耳蜗中部的电极NRT阈值较高.经单因素方差分析,不同部位NRT阈值均差异有统计学意义.同一测试电极,随术后开机时间的增长,NRT阈值呈逐渐增加的趋势.经单因素方差分析,术后不同测试时间NRT阈值均差异有统计学意义.结论:术后开机1年内,NRT阈值呈逐渐增加的趋势.若人工耳蜗植入术后调试需要NRT进行辅助,每次均应测试NRT阈值,以便更准确估算患者的行为反应T、C级,尤其对植入术后1年内的儿童患者更为重要.     

糖皮质激素对儿童人工耳蜗植入后早期电极阻抗的影响

目的探讨糖皮质激素不同使用方法对儿童人工耳蜗植入者术后早期电极阻抗的影响。方法回顾性收集于我院行澳大利亚Nucleus 24CA型多导人工耳蜗植入儿童患者资料,根据糖皮质激素使用方法纳入经鼓室圆窗给药组(A组)及经鼓室圆窗联合全身静脉给药组(B组);以各组22个电极相对于耳蜗内位置分为高频段(3-6)、中频段(10-13)及低频段(17-20)3个亚组,检测各组术中、开机(术后1月)、术后3月及术后6月电极阻抗值,并进行统计学分析。结果两组22个电极阻抗平均值均在术中较低,开机时最高,术后6个月达最低值;开机、术后3月及术后6月两组电极阻抗值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在各亚组间比较中,两组在术中不同频段比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),开机时两组间各频段电阻抗值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组各频段电极阻抗值小于A组,且两组开机与术中电阻抗差值均在高频段较大;术后3月及6月两组高频段比较仍具统计学差异(P<0.05),而低频段无明显差别(P>0.05)。结论经鼓室圆窗联合全身静脉给药途径在降低术后电极阻抗效果方面优于局部单独使用,在高频段尤为明显,提示糖皮质激素联合应用更有利于降低耳蜗植入后电极周围纤维化组织形成。     

Nucleus 24人工耳蜗系统直电极与弯电极神经反应遥测值的比较

目的:测试和比较Nucleus 24人工耳蜗系统中直电极与弯电极神经反应遥测(NRT)值的差别,分析内耳螺旋神经节细胞对不同电极电刺激反应特性的差异。方法:对46例进行耳蜗植入和编程的Nucleus 24人工耳蜗系统直电极与弯电极患者进行配对分析,计算患者vNRT值的均值,并进行统计学比较。结果:直电极的NRT值为160～170μV,弯电极为150～160μV,总的趋势是低频值较低而高频值较高。结论:Nucleus 24人工耳蜗系统弯电极较直电极所需电刺激量略低。     

Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation according to types of Nucleus 24-channel electrode arrays

Conclusion. In this study, we concluded that electrode design and location did not have a high level of influence on the prevalence of facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in normal cochleae. Objective. To analysis the prevalence of FNS after cochlear implantation with Nucleus 24-channel devices according to types of electrodes arrays. Patients and methods. We retrospectively analyzed medical and mapping records of 394 patients who received cochlear implants (CIs) manufactured by Cochlear Corporation from April 1999 to March 2007. Results. In all, 23 of 394 (5.8%) patients had FNS (CI24M 4 of 39 [10.3%], CI24RCS 9 of 192 [4.7%], CI24RST 9 of 21 [42.9%], and CI24RECA 1 of 87 [1.1%]). In addition, 4 of 324 (1.2%) patients with normal cochleae complained of FNS (CI24M 1 of 33 [3.0%], CI24RCS 2 of 173 [1.2%], and CI24RECA 1 of 71 [1.4%]). There was no difference between straight and perimodiolar electrode arrays in patients with normal cochleae. In addition, when comparing two types of Contour? electrodes, Contour Advance? (soft-tip) electrodes offered significantly lower incidence of FNS than Contour? electrode arrays. We could manage these patients with methods such as decrease of C-level, selective channel turning off, and changes of mapping strategies.     

Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels

The objective of this study was to investigate electrode impedance in cochlear implant recipients in relation to electrically evoked stapedius reflex measurements during surgery, and to electrode design, stimulation mode, and T and C levels over a nine month period after surgery. Seventy-five implant recipients, implanted with a Nucleus straight electrode array or a Contour array, were included. The results show that: (1) during surgery electrode impedance decreases markedly after electrically evoked stapedius reflex measurements, (2) after surgery, during the period without stimulation until speech processor switch-on, impedance increases, (3) after processor switch-on impedance decreases. The lower impedance values after a period of stimulation are found at the higher T and C levels. Impedances of the straight array electrodes are lower than those of the Contour array. The difference corresponds mainly to their respective surface areas. In addition, the straight array shows a larger increase of impedance in the apical direction than the Contour array, probably because of the larger fluid environment around the basal electrodes of the straight array.     

Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the incidence and nature of facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in patients receiving cochlear implants (CI) manufactured by Cochlear Corporation, Advanced Bionics Corporation, and MedEl. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: The charts of 600 patients who received CIs from 1993 to 2003 with at least 1 year of follow-up were reviewed for significant FNS (FNS on at least 1 channel at functional stimulation levels). Data collected included age, sex, etiology of deafness, device type, electrode, FNS onset after initial stimulation, number and location of electrode contacts causing FNS, and loudness level at which FSN occurred. Nucleus straight and perimodiolar electrodes were also compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 600 (6.5%) patients had FNS on at least one channel, (MedEl 3 of 43 [7.0%], Nucleus 29 of 440 [6.6%], and Clarion 7 of 117 [6.0%]). The incidence of FNS in Nucleus perimodiolar electrodes (16 of 250 [6.4%]) was similar to straight electrodes (13 of 190 (6.8%]), as was the mean number of electrodes causing FNS per patient (11 vs. 12). However, straight electrodes caused stimulation at significantly softer perceived loudness levels than perimodiolar electrodes (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of CI FNS, the overall incidence of FNS is consistent with previous reports. All devices had a similar incidence of FNS, but perimodiolar electrodes produced FNS only at significantly higher loudness levels than straight electrodes, making them preferable for patients at risk for FNS receiving Nucleus devices.     

Nucleus24型人工耳蜗使用者电诱发听神经复合动作电位的测定

目的 :探讨电诱发听神经复合动作电位 (ECAP)的特点及在人工耳蜗临床中的应用价值和意义。方法 :应用NRT(neuralresponsetelemetry)软件 ,通过体外言语处理器和耳蜗内的植入电极系统 ,采用单极模式电极刺激和近场记录方法 ,对 37例NucleusCI2 4M装置使用者进行ECAP的记录。对其中 12例使用者做了行为测试。结果 :87.6 %的使用者记录到ECAP波形。分析了有行为阈值的 12例测试者的ECAP阈值和行为阈值的关系 ,二者之间存在显著的相关性。结论 :ECAP的检出率高且波形稳定可靠 ,在临床人工耳蜗装置的调试中可作为对行为测试的补充 ;对于年幼儿童和首次开机的患者的调试尤其重要     

儿童人工耳蜗植入术后电诱发复合动作电位分析

目的 应用神经反应遥测(NRT)技术,观察人工耳蜗植入后不同时间段的电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)阈值变化,探讨其对人工耳蜗术后调机的指导意义。方法 对33例使用Nucleus CI24R(CA)型人工耳蜗植入的患儿,于术中及术后1、1.5、2、4、6个月进行ECAP 阈值测试,统计分析其变化规律。结果 33例165个电极的波形检出率为93.3%。电极1、7、11、17、22的术中ECAP阈值与术后30d开机时的ECAP阈值的差异有统计学意义。同一测试电极,随术后开机时间的增长,ECAP阈值呈逐渐增加的趋势。经单因素方差分析,术后不同测试时间ECAP阈值差异有统计学意义。结论 ECAP检出率高,术中可用于检测神经反应;术后可协助估算患者的行为反应T、C级,指导调机,尤其对儿童患者更为重要。     

Comparison of electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds in nucleus CI24R cochlear implant recipients

In this study, differences between electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential (EAP) and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) measurements within Nucleus CI24R cochlear implant recipients were evaluated. Precurved modiolus-hugging internal electrode arrays, such as the CI24R, are designed to provide more direct stimulation of neural elements of the modiolus. If the electrode array is closer to the modiolus, electrically evoked and behavioral levels might be lower than were previously recorded for the straight electrode array, the CI24M. EAP and EABR growth functions and behavioral levels were obtained for 10 postlingually deafened adults. Results revealed no significant differences between EAP and EABR threshold levels, and these levels were not significantly lower than those obtained using the CI24M.