剖腹腹腔内补片修补腹壁切口疝21例体会

目的 探讨、总结剖腹腹腔内补片修补腹壁切口疝的经验.方法 2007年2月至2010年3月收治的21例腹壁切口疝采用复合补片进行开放式完全腹腔内修补.结果 1例术后3d死于腹腔室间隔综合征,其余20例无并发症发生,随访 6个月～3年无复发.结论 腹壁切口疝采用复合补片进行开放式完全腹腔内修补方法安全、有效     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

戈尔（Gore）补片修补治疗成人腹股沟疝、腹壁切口疝185例临床疗效分析

目的探讨戈尔（Gore）补片无张力修补术治疗成人腹外疝的疗效。方法回顾分析2003年1月至2007年6月我院普通外科应用美国戈尔公司生产的戈尔平片修补185例成人腹股沟疝及腹壁切口疝。单侧腹股沟斜疝121例,单侧腹股沟直疝27例,双侧腹股沟直疝22例,腹壁切口疝15例。其中复发疝35例,原发性疝150例。巨大斜疝50例,巨大直疝6例,均为单例。复发巨大斜疝13例,复发巨大直疝2例。结果185例中,无阴囊血肿,无睾丸缺血坏死,无下肢血栓形成,无明显异物感、疼痛感,无切口感染,随访1～3年,无复发。结论戈尔（Gore）疝补片无张力修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝及腹壁切口疝,复发率低,疼痛感、异物感轻,无切口感染,适合于各种腹股沟疝及腹壁切口疝的手术治疗,安全可靠。     

复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例分析

目的 分析应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的临床效果，讨论应用复合补片的手术方法和经验体会。方法 1999年5月～2005年5月应用复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例，其中皮下置片法12例，腹腔内法18例。平均随访期36个月。结果 术后复发2例，占6．7％。切口并发症33．3％，切口感染5例，均为皮下法；皮下积液5例，其中皮下法3例，腹腔内法2例。结论 腹壁巨大切口疝，特别是传统法难以修补的，可应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合补片修补。应用腹腔内法及正确的术中、术后处理可减少术后并发症的发生。     

应用聚丙烯和e-PTFE复合补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝

目的回顾性分析应用聚丙烯和e鄄PTFE复合补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的效果,介绍腹腔内应用复合补片的方法和经验。方法1999年5月至2003年12月应用复合补片修补腹膜难以对合的腹壁巨大缺损22例,其中补片置于皮下12例,腹腔内10例。平均随访期39个月。结果手术后切口并发症的发生率为41%(9/22),1例修补术后复发,占4.6%。应用皮下法发生切口感染3例,其中1例因严重感染而将补片取出;切口处皮下积液2例。应用腹腔内法者中仅2例发生切口皮下少量积液。结论腹壁巨大切口疝,特别是难以关闭腹膜的病例,可应用聚丙烯和e鄄PTFE复合补片进行修补。应用腹腔内置补片法并辅以正确的术后处理可使局部并发症明显减少。     

人工合成补片修补腹壁切口疝临床探讨

目的探讨人工合成补片修补腹壁切口疝的有效方法。方法回顾性分析2004年3月至2008年9月经我院诊治的34例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。其中10例行肌筋膜前置补片修补法（Onlay），22例行腹膜前置补片修补法（Sublay），2例肌间置补片修补法（Inlay）。结果34例均痊愈出院，无严重并发症，随访1—54个月，Onlay组复发2例，Sublay组复发1例，Inlay组复发1例。结论Sublay治疗腹壁切口疝复发率低，是治疗腹壁切口疝的理想方法。     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝九例体会

目的　总结应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝。方法　回顾分析应用涤纶布 ,聚丙烯和膨体聚四氟乙烯补片修补 9例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的术前准备 ,手术方法和引流放置。结果　 9例均治愈 ,随访 4个月～ 1 2年无复发。结论　应用补片无张力修补巨大腹壁切口疝是一种简单、易行和有效的方法。     

腹壁疝补片修补术后补片感染14例分析

目的：探讨疝修补术后补片感染的原因、预防及治疗方法。方法回顾性分析1997年12月至2013年12月我院收治的14例使用补片修补腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床资料。其中腹股沟疝平片修补1例,腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙修补11例,切口疝1例,使用巴德Composix补片开放式腹腔内补片修补;造口疝1例,腹壁肌肉前置入补片修补。根据感染程度、材料不同采用相应的治疗方法,4例去除补片,10例开放换药。结果全组患者均治愈出院,无围手术期死亡。手术过程中无大出血和膀胱损伤。随访时间8～64个月,1例切口疝术后复发。结论产生补片感染的原因很多,预防感染最为重要。一旦发生补片感染,治疗方法应个体化,有效引流及合理运用抗生素可解决多数聚丙烯（PPM）补片感染,唯膨体聚四氟乙烯（ePTFE）补片需完全去除。     

双面复合补片在腹壁切口疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨复合补片治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2004年1月至2008年9月间6例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。结果应用BardComposixMesh和BardComposixKugel补片行腹腔内修补6例。术后所有患者均顺利恢复,局部感觉良好,未发生切口感染、皮下血清肿、肠梗阻、窦道形成和肠瘘,随访6～48个月,无1例复发。结论应用双面复合补片腹腔内置入修补切口疝是一种安全、有效、可靠的治疗腹壁切口疝的方法。     

老年巨大腹壁切口疝的外科治疗

目的 探讨老年巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法并总结围手术期处理经验.方法 我院普外科2002 年1月至2011年1月采用单丝聚丙烯补片行开放式腹壁巨大切口疝修补术共21例,其中行肌前补片修补法(Onlay)3例,肌肉间补片修补法(Inlay)1例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法(Sublay)15例,腹腔内补片修补法(IPOM)2例.结果 手术时间(140.5±22.7)min;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症.无围手术期死亡,无切口感染及复发病例.结论 应用单丝聚丙烯补片无张力修补术治疗老年巨大腹壁切口疝安全可靠,加强围手术期合并症的处理可以减少术后并发症的发生.     

Open intraperitoneal hernia repair for treatment of abdominal wall defects--early results by placement of a polypropylene-ePTFE-mesh

BACKGROUND: Large incisional hernias are mainly repaired today by tension free implantations of prosthetic meshes using various placement methods. The advantages of the intraperitoneal open technique (IPOM) using a polypropylene mesh that is coated with ePTFE on the side facing the intestine, are described. METHODS AND RESULTS: 62 patients underwent an incisional hernia operation with the intraperitoneal positioning of a prosthetic mesh. The follow-up examinations after a range of 16.1 months showed a hernial recurrence rate of 6.4 %. A part of the resulting mesh infections (11.2 %) healed without surgical removal of the mesh. Clinical complications due to adhesion formation were not observed. CONCLUSION: The tissue sparing intraabdominal positioning technique simplifies the necessary overlap using healthy tissue as a prerequisite for a sufficient hernia repair exploiting the intraabdominal pressure.     

Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair with prosthetic material is followed by fewer recurrences than primary repair. Polypropylene is the most commonly used prosthetic material but may cause entero- cutaneous fistulas. The aim of this study was to determine whether enterocutaneous fistulas developed after incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh and to evaluate clinical outcome after incisional hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the outcome of incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh between 1982 and 1998 was conducted. Follow-up data were obtained from medical records and questionnaires. RESULTS: Polypropylene incisional hernia repair was performed in 136 patients. Median follow-up was 34 months. No enterocutaneous fistulas developed. Wound infection occurred in 6 per cent. Wound sinus formation occurred in two patients. No mesh was removed because of infection and no persisting infection of the mesh occurred. CONCLUSION: Enterocutaneous fistula formation appears to be very rare after incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh, regardless of intraperitoneal placement, omental coverage or closing of the peritoneum.     

Abdominal incisional hernia repair. Intraperitoneal prosthetic technique using Bard Kugel Composix Mesh

The treatment of choice for incisional hernia is prosthetic repair Extensively debated issues are the materials used and the implantation site of the mesh. The authors report their personal experience with 17 cases operated on by placement of an intraperitoneal Bard Kugel Composix Mesh. From May 2003 to August 2005, 10 female and 7 male patients with incisional hernia, aged from 43 to 76 years (mean age: 65 years), were submitted to intraperitoneal prosthetic mesh implantation and monitored over a follow up period ranging from 2 to 28 months (median: 15 months). The technical aspects and the rationale for this approach are described. The advantages of this procedure are its simplicity and rapidity of execution, a reduced incidence of complications, and good tolerance in terms of patient pain and comfort. The mesh was removed in one case owing to infection of the prosthesis. Follow-up to date has revealed no instances of recurrence.     

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair as first therapeutic choice

AIM: Incisional hernias are one of the most frequent complications of open abdominal surgery. Historically, the best results have been obtained with the open rives-stoppa approach. This is done by fixing a large piece of prosthetic mesh behind the rectus muscle. Laparoscopic approach allows similar mesh placement with minimal dissection and lower recurrence rate compared to the open mesh repair. METHODS: Between October 2001 to September 2003, 75 consecutive patients were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with ePTFE mesh (Gore-Tex Dualmesh Plus). Postoperative complications were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Most were obese affected by multiple wall defects Conversion to open surgery was required in 1 case Postoperative complications occurred 13.3%. Recurrence occurred in one only case. CONCLUSIONS: The key to the success of this procedure is avoidance of complications. The laparoscopic approach is safe, effective and relatively complication-free option in the management of patients presenting with a first time or recurrent incisional hernia and recommended as the treatment of choice.     

Preliminary results in the use of a new composite prosthesis in incisional hernia repair

The repair of incisional hernias with the use of prosthetic biomaterials is the standard of care today. There are different prosthetic biomaterials that can be used to repair incisional hernias. These materials can be divided into products that are single component or a combination. Incisional hernia repair using the intraperitoneal implantation of a prosthesis requires mesh with impervious properties. This is preliminary study with a new composite non resorbable mesh in polyethylene terephthalate-polyurethane (HI-TEX PARP MP) used for incisional hernia repair in intraperitoneal implantation. This mesh has one permeable side in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for rapid tissue fixation and another side in polyurethane (PEU), hydrophobic in order to avoid cell penetration. This is a preliminary study of medical records of 24 patients (17 women and 7 men) in whom intraperitoneal placement of composite prosthetics in polyethylene terephthalate-polyurethane (HI-TEX PARP MP) was used between September 2004 and September 2006. The incisional hernias were recurrent in 8 patients. The underside of the mesh was placed in direct contact with the visceral peritoneum, whereas the upper side made contact with the subcutaneous tissue. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively, 1 had seromas, 1 had phlegmon of the wound without removing prosthetics. There was 1 death but not dependent of the surgical performance. The follow-up, was 12 months (range 1 month-2 years); none had discomfort; only one patient had recurrence. Intraperitoneal placement of HI-TEX PARP MP has several advantages over other techniques including minimal adhesions, a decreased risk of infection and recurrences. In addition this mesh is more economics than the other prosthetics in use.     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with extraperitoneal mesh: surgical technique and early results

Laparoscopic repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias involves intraperitoneal placement of a mesh, which may lead to adhesion formation and bowel fistulation. The first series of selected patients with ventral abdominal wall hernias treated laparoscopically by extraperitoneal placement of a polypropylene mesh is presented. Thirty-four patients (24 women and 10 men; median age, 52 years [range, 34-70]) were selected from among 122 patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Of these patients, 18 had a primary ventral abdominal wall hernia and 16 had an incisional hernia. After reduction of sac contents and adhesiolysis intraperitoneally, a large flap of peritoneum (with extraperitoneal fat, fascia, and posterior rectus sheath where present) was raised to accommodate a suitably sized polypropylene mesh, which was then covered again with the peritoneal flap at the end of the procedure. Intraoperatively, apart from circumcision of the hernial sac at the neck, a total of 24 iatrogenic peritoneal tears occurred in 20 patients, mainly at the site of the previous scar. In two patients, it was observed that greater than 25% of the mesh was exposed after the procedure. The median (+/-SD) duration of hospitalization postoperatively was 1 day (+/-0.56). One patient's hernia recurred 4 months after surgery, and one patient's infected mesh was removed 8 months after surgery. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal placement of a mesh is feasible and appears to be an advance over laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh placement for ventral abdominal wall hernias in selected patients. However, longer follow-up and controlled clinical trials will be necessary before any firm conclusions can be drawn.     

Primary closure of laparotomies with high risk of incisional hernia using prosthetic material: analysis of usefulness

Incisional hernia continues to be a serious postoperative complication in abdominal surgery. We present a prospective randomised study to evaluate the usefulness of placement of a supra-aponeurotic polypropylene mesh in the primary closure of laparotomies with a high risk of incisional hernia. Closure of a vertical laparotomy in 100 patients was accomplished with continuous suture using non-reabsorbable material, with placement of a polypropylene mesh on the aponeurotic surface in 50 patients. Three years after surgery, five patients in the group without the mesh had suffered incisional hernia. No incisional hernia was detected in the group in which closure was made using the mesh (P=0.02). Use of prosthetic material (polypropylene mesh) in the primary closure of laparotomies with a high risk of incisional hernia is useful for reduction of the rate of incisional hernias.     

复合补片修补腹壁切口疝十例的临床分析

目的评价应用复合补片腹膜内置入修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法2003年11月至2005年6月应用复合补片修补腹膜难以对合的腹壁切口疝10例，均采用腹膜内置入修补法。结果所有患者均顺利恢复，手术后早期未发生切口感染、皮下血肿和血清肿等并发症。10例患者术后均得到随访，随访6～24个月，平均18个月。随访期内未发现肠梗阻、窦道形成和肠瘘等远期并发症和切口疝复发，10例患者均局部感觉良好。结论应用复合补片腹膜内置入修补切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法。     

合成材料修补切口疝37例分析

目的;探讨合成材料修补腹壁切口疝的方法及效果。方法：用Marlex网片修补切口疝32例,Composix网片修补5例。补片放置位置：腹肌后15例,腹肌前12例,直接覆盖10例。结果：术后33例病人随访3－28个月,除1例病人外,其余病人均未见复发。结论：用生物合成材料修补腹壁切口疝安全、可靠,复发率低。     

An unusual cause of chronic anemia and abdominal pain caused by transmural mesh migration in the small bowel after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Mesh repair of incisional hernia is recommended to reduce recurrence. Recognized complications include mesh infection and fistula. Composite meshes with antiadhesive barriers were designed for intraperitoneal placement to reduce adhesion formation and fistulization to the viscera. Transmural mesh migration is a rare complication of hernia repair with composite mesh and can be present with a variety of symptoms. We report an interesting case of transmural mesh migration into the small bowel presenting with chronic microcytic anemia and abdominal pain 5 years after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with a composite polypropylene/ePTFE mesh.