Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not accurate in predicting lymph node status for patients with cervical carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in predicting lymph node status for patients with early cervical carcinoma. In particular, the authors set out to determine the false-negative rate associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy in this setting. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with early cervical carcinoma who were treated with pelvic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and radical surgery underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy following lymphatic mapping with patent blue dye. All sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes were evaluated for micrometastases via multilevel sectioning followed by immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: At least one sentinel lymph node was identified for each patient. On routine pathologic evaluation, 3 patients (10%) were found to have positive lymph nodes. Among the remaining 26 patients, multilevel sectioning in conjunction with immunohistochemical analysis identified 5 patients (19%) who had micrometastases in the pelvic lymph nodes. Two of these five patients had micrometastases in a sentinel lymph node; however, the more notable finding was that the other three patients had micrometastases in nonsentinel pelvic lymph nodes despite having negative findings on sentinel lymph node biopsy. Thus, the negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the current study was 87.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel sectioning followed by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry may identify additional patients who have lymph node micrometastases; in the current study, this technique identified cases in which micrometastases were present in nonsentinel lymph nodes even when sentinel lymph nodes were found to be negative for disease on biopsy. This high false-negative rate associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy, raises questions regarding the validity of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical carcinoma.     

The role of sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Aim

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an accepted alternative to lymphadenectomy in the case of invasive breast carcinoma, although the sentinel node's role in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed on core needle biopsy has not been well defined nevertheless guidelines recommend this procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of sentinel nodes in female patients with primary DCIS using core needle stereotactic biopsy.

Material and methods

Between the years 2000 and 2005, 261 patients were diagnosed with DCIS by core needle biopsy. In this group, 183 patients underwent SNB to determine lymph node involvement. Those patients with metastases to the sentinel node underwent axillary lymphadenectomy.

Results

In the group of 183 patients that underwent SNB, 10 patients (5.5%) showed metastases to the sentinel lymph node. Histopathological studies of the primary lesions of these 10 patients revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 6 cases (3.5%) and 1 case (0.5%) of invasive lobular carcinoma. Only 3 of the patients (1.5%) were given a final diagnosis of DCIS with metastases to sentinel lymph nodes, of which 2 cases were DCIS and 1 case was DCIS with microinvasion. Axillary lymphadenectomy performed on patients with abnormal SNB showed involvement of other axillary lymph nodes in 4 patients.

Conclusions

SNB as a diagnostic tool in DCIS remains controversial as the number of cases of axillary lymph node metastases is minuscule. The biggest clinical challenge in this situation is a group of patients with primary diagnosis of DCIS in which invasive components are seen by mammotomic biopsy.     

Blue nodes left behind after vital blue dye-guided axillary sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Vital dye-guided sentinel node biopsy is affordable in most hospitals, but may be of limited accuracy in identifying all sentinel nodes. Leaving sentinel nodes in the axilla may result in a false nodal staging of breast carcinomas. METHODS: From a series of 112 successful sentinel lymph node biopsies with Patent Blue dye followed by axillary dissection, 10 cases were identified where 1-3 blue nodes were found in the axillary dissection specimens. These 10 cases were compared with those which had all blue nodes identified during surgery. Five of the 10 patients with missed blue nodes also underwent lymphoscintigraphy with 99m-Tc-labeled colloidal human albumin and all of their nodes were subjected to external gamma well counting postoperatively. RESULTS: There were six false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsies overall, but none in patients with missed blue nodes. Patients with primarily unidentified blue nodes had more sentinel nodes and a higher rate of multiple sentinel nodes than the others. CONCLUSION: Blue nodes missed during surgery may be either true sentinel nodes or second echelon nodes labeled by dye overflow. This type of error may occur in <8% of patients and may lead to false-negative sentinel node-based staging in an even smaller proportion of cases (none in this series).     

Sentinel node guided surgery for melanoma in the head and neck region

Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be more technically challenging for melanoma of the head and neck compared with other locations because of the complex lymphatic drainage patterns. This study demonstrates the value of sentinel node biopsy for head and neck melanoma, and highlights the associated difficulties. Thirty consecutive patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (n=26) or draining to the neck (n=4) underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. This was followed by intraoperative lymphatic mapping using blue dye alone (n=8) or in combination with a hand-held gamma probe (n=22) and sentinel lymphadenectomy. Modified neck dissection was performed in all patients with positive sentinel nodes. The study population had a male predominance (73%). Most lesions were nodular and were not ulcerated. In two patients (6.2%) preoperative lymphoscintigraphy failed to demonstrate the draining nodes, which were retrieved by surgery, and in two patients (6.2%) the sentinel node was not found at surgery despite preoperative visualization. Overall, the sentinel node was identified 93% of the time: in seven out of eight cases (88%) using blue dye alone, and in 21 out of 22 cases (96%) using a combination of blue dye and gamma probe. Four out of 28 basins were deemed positive for metastases. Twenty-three of the 24 patients with negative sentinel nodes were free of disease at a median of 31 months (range 9-91 months). There was one false-negative case salvaged by surgery. The sentinel node technique is technically demanding but advantageous for most patients with head and neck melanoma. Identification rates seem to be better when preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is combined with intraoperative blue dye mapping and a hand-held gamma probe. The relative contribution of each component could not be determined.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer--is lymphoscintigraphy really necessary?

The role of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer remains debatable. This study assesses the value of lymphoscintigraphy in axillary sentinel node biopsy in women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Sixty-two patients underwent sentinel node biopsy using a combination of technetium-labelled nanocolloid, lympho-scintigraphy and patent blue dye. Lymphoscintigraphy was successful in 84% of patients. Axillary sentinel nodes were identified intraoperatively in all these patients. Internal mammary nodes were identified on lymphoscintigraphy in 19%. Despite lymphoscintigraphy being unsuccessful in 10 patients, axillary sentinel nodes were found intraoperatively in eight of these patients. Lymphoscintigraphy did not increase the detection rate of axillary sentinel nodes and a negative scan did not preclude identification of an axillary sentinel node intraoperatively. This study questions the contribution of lymphoscintigraphy in axillary sentinel node biopsy, however its value may lie in the detection of extra-axillary nodes.     

Sentinel lymph node procedure is highly accurate in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and to investigate whether step sectioning and immunohistochemistry of sentinel lymph nodes increase the sensitivity for detection of metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1996 and July 1999, 59 patients with primary vulvar cancer were entered onto a two-center prospective study. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid and intraoperative blue dye). Radical excision of the primary tumor with uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed subsequently. Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphadenectomy specimens were sent for histopathologic examination separately. Sentinel lymph nodes, negative at the time of routine pathologic examination, were re-examined with step sectioning and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In 59 patients, 107 inguinofemoral lymphadenectomies were performed (11 unilateral and 48 bilateral). All sentinel lymph nodes, as observed on preoperative lymphoscintigram, were identified successfully intraoperatively. Routine histopathologic examination showed lymph node metastases in 27 groins, all of which were detected by the sentinel lymph node procedure. The negative predictive value for a negative sentinel lymph node was 100% (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 95% to 100%). Step sectioning and immunohistochemistry showed four additional metastases in 102 sentinel lymph nodes (4%; 95% CI, 1% to 9%) that were negative at the time of routine histopathologic examination. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique is highly accurate in predicting the inguinofemoral lymph node status in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. Future trials should focus on the safe clinical implementation of the sentinel lymph node procedure in these patients. Step sectioning and immunohistochemistry slightly increase the sensitivity of detecting metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and should be included in these trials.     

Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Initial studies of sentinel lymphadenectomy for patients with breast carcinoma confirmed that the status of the sentinel lymph nodes was an accurate predictor of the presence of metastatic disease in the axillary lymph nodes. Sentinel lymphadenectomy, as an axillary staging procedure, has risks of morbidity that have yet to be defined. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a two-phase protocol that included concurrent data collection of patient characteristics and treatment variables. During the first (validation) phase, 72 patients underwent sentinel lymph node excision followed by a level I-II axillary dissection. After the technique had been established, the second phase commenced, during which only patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes underwent an axillary dissection. RESULTS: During the second phase, lymphedema was identified in 9 of 303 patients (3.0%) who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy alone and in 20 of 117 patients (17.1%) who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy combined with axillary dissection (P < 0.0001). Of 303 patients who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy alone, 8 of 155 patients (5.1%) with tumors located in the upper outer quadrant and 1 of 148 patients (0.7%) with tumors in other locations developed lymphedema (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing lymphedema after undergoing sentinel lymphadenectomy was measurable but significantly lower than after undergoing axillary dissection. Tumor location in the upper outer quadrant and postoperative trauma and/or infection were identifiable risk factors for lymphedema.     

cN0舌癌前哨淋巴结定位方法研究

背景与目的：由于没有任何临床检查方法或生化标志能准确的评价临床NO（clinically negative neck,cNO)舌癌颈部淋巴结转移的状况。因而,目前对cNO舌癌的颈部治疗存在一定的盲目性。前哨淋巴结（sentinel node,SN)活检的应用为指导cNO舌癌患者颈部的个体化治疗提供了依据。本研究旨在探讨SN活检能否准确评价cNO舌癌的颈部淋巴结转移状况,寻找舌癌前哨淋巴结定位的最佳方法。方法：使用术前核素扫描法和术中亚甲蓝示踪法对24例cNO舌癌患者进行SN示踪,研究SN活检在评价cNO舌癌颈部淋巴结转移状况中的作用。对比核素扫描法,亚甲蓝示踪法,两法结合示踪法的优缺点。结果：3种方法全组SN检出率均为100%,24例中有4例手术标本发现有颈淋巴结转移（即隐匿性颈淋巴结转移,cNOpN^ ),SN活检对全组病例颈部淋巴结转移状况评价的准确率为100%。无假阴性;平均检出SN数目;核素扫描法3.5枚/例,亚甲蓝示踪法2.7枚/例,两法结合示踪法2.2枚/例。结论：核素扫描法和亚甲蓝示踪法均能有效地对cNO舌癌进行SN定位并准确地评价颈部淋巴结转移状况,两法结合SN示踪法最为准确。并且具有可操作性和实用性。     

Lymphatic mapping with intralesional tracer administration in breast carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to determine how often a sentinel lymph node is visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in breast carcinoma patients, how often the sentinel lymph node is identified during surgery, and the sensitivity of these procedures to identify the presence of axillary lymph node metastasis. METHODS: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in 2 hospitals. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy were performed; in addition, both a vital dye and a gamma detection probe were used intraoperatively. The tracers were injected into the primary lesion. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. The sentinel lymph nodes and other axillary lymph nodes were examined routinely and by immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: A sentinel lymph node was visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in 118 patients (87%). During the operation a sentinel lymph node was localized in 126 patients (93%). A total of 224 sentinel lymph nodes were harvested (average of 1.7 and range of 1-4 sentinel lymph nodes per patient). Of all the sentinel lymph nodes, 37 were blue (17%), 68 were radioactive (30%), and 119 were both blue and radioactive (53%). The sentinel lymph nodes contained metastatic disease in 56 patients (44%). Three sentinel lymph node biopsies were false-negative (sensitivity 95%). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy after intralesional tracer administration and intraoperative use of both a gamma detection probe and a vital dye is a reliable technique for staging the axilla of breast carcinoma patients.     

Radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) and sentinel node biopsy for impalpable invasive breast cancer.

AIM: The aim of this study was to simplify the technique of ROLL and sentinel node biopsy without compromising tumour excision and sentinel node biopsy. METHODS: Twenty patients with impalpable primary invasive breast carcinoma underwent an injection of 99mTc-nanocolloid mixed with radiographic contrast medium Iohexol into the centre of the lesion under ultrasound or stereotactic guidance pre-operatively. No guidewire localisation was performed. Under general anaesthesia, a periareolar intradermal/subcutaneous injection of patent blue-V dye was performed. The sentinel node was identified by blue-stained lymphatics and node and a hot spot on the gamma probe. Surgical excision of the primary tumour was then carried out using the gamma probe. RESULTS: In eight of 20 cases an immediate re-excision was carried out and on histological assessment, all 20 patients were clear of invasive disease at the margins. In two patients, in situ disease was present at the margins and a further re-excision was therefore performed. The sentinel node was identified in all cases. In all, five of 20 patients were node positive on routine HE staining. In a further two patients, tumour cells were identified by immunohistochemistry with CAM5.2 antibody. Completion axillary clearance in six patients confirmed that the sentinel node was the only positive node. CONCLUSIONS: This modification of the previously described ROLL technique is feasible and safe and does not compromise tumour excision or sentinel node detection.     

Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in predicting nodal status in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While sentinel lymph node biopsy is considered by many to have replaced axillary node dissection in the management of breast cancer, concerns remain regarding false-negative results. METHODS: To investigate the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy, we reexamined all sentinel and nonsentinel nodes with multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemical staining in 42 consecutive cases of breast cancer in which sentinel node biopsy was performed and followed by axillary dissection. RESULTS: By routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, 34% of patients were found to be node positive, with no cases of false-negative sentinel node biopsy. Reevaluation of 775 negative sentinel and nonsentinel nodes with an additional two levels and immunohistochemistry identified three "node-negative" patients who had micrometastases in the sentinel node, increasing detection in 8% of cases. More important, is the fact however, that there were no cases where additional sections and immunohistochemistry identified metastases in nonsentinel nodes that had bypassed the sentinel node. The accuracy of the sentinel node in predicting the nodal status was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry will identify more patients with nodal micrometastases; however, it was unable to identify any cases where micrometastases were present in nonsentinel nodes when the sentinel node was negative. The status of the sentinel node accurately identifies the status of the axillary basin.     

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy reliable and indicated after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Many studies support the concept and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) for staging patients with breast carcinoma, which can be performed with low morbidity in lymph node negative patients. Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) plays an important role in the treatment of patients with operable breast carcinoma and is another approach with which to reduce radical surgery in patients with more advanced disease. It is of interest whether the sentinel lymph node accurately represents the axillary status after PC and, thus, whether the sentinel node concept can be applied to both groups. METHODS: Thirty-three patients underwent SNB after chemotherapy and prior to axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: The average greatest tumor dimension before chemotherapy (33 mm +/- 2 mm) was significantly larger (P = 0.000) than after therapy (20 mm +/- 3 mm). Histopathologic complete remission was seen in only three patients. One or two sentinel lymph nodes (average, 1.7 lymph nodes) were identified with certainty in 29 of 33 procedures and accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in all of these patients. Breast-conserving surgery was possible in 21 patients (64%), and axillary lymph nodes were involved in 22 patients (67%). CONCLUSIONS: Even after patients undergo PC, SNB seems to be a reliable method for accurate staging of the axilla in those more advanced breast carcinoma. Thus, axillary dissection may be avoided in certain patients. Lymph node involvement seems to be likely in women with suspicious axillary findings before chemotherapy who have no visible sentinel lymph nodes on preoperative lymphosintigraphy and in patients without recurrent tumors. Further investigation of the SNB concept in this patient group should be evaluated in larger studies.     

Desmoplastic and neurotropic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic and neurotropic melanoma (DNMM) occasionally metastasizes to regional lymph nodes and extranodal sites. The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has not been demonstrated clearly for patients with DNMM. The authors report on the utility of SLNB in the management of patients with DNMM. METHODS: The authors identified 33 patients with DNMM who were seen during a 5-year period in their institution who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB. Clinical and histopathologic data were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with DNMM underwent SLNB (mean Breslow depth, 4.0 mm; median, 2.8 mm). There were 25 male patients and 8 female patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 31-86 years). Fifty-two percent of tumors presented in the head and neck region, and 24% were associated with lentigo maligna. Four of 33 patients (12%) without clinical evidence of metastatic disease who underwent SLNB had at least 1 positive sentinel lymph node. No additional positive lymph nodes were found in subsequent therapeutic regional lymphadenectomy in any of these four patients. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB detected subclinical metastases of DNMM to regional lymph nodes. SLNB at the time of resection can provide useful information to guide early treatment and, coupled with lymphadenectomy in positive patients, may limit tumor spread and prevent recurrence at the draining lymph node basin.     

Sentinel node identification by scintigraphic methods in cutaneous melanoma

In melanoma patients lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor that indicates the need for therapeutic lymph node dissection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy mapping associated with radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy has become a well established procedure for cutaneous melanoma patients without clinically detectable lymph node metastases (stage I, II). This technique is a versatile way of characterizing the lymphatic basin at risk for metastases and identifying involved lymph nodes. The purpose of the present study was to examine the reproducibility of lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in detecting micro metastases in cutaneous melanoma. The study was a single-institution prospective analysis of 74 melanoma patients, with primary tumors having Breslow thickness > 0.7 mm, who underwent lymphoscintigraphies between May 2002 and September 2003. Technetium-99m sulfur colloid was injected intradermally at the primary tumor site and dynamic images were obtained for 40 minutes. Two observers evaluated the images. One to two weeks after the first lymphoscintigraphy, radioguided lymph node biopsy was performed. For the biopsy, technetium-99m sulfer colloid was injected intradermally in the same manner as performed before. Lymph nodes were identified and removed with the aid of a gamma ray detecting probe (GDP), and were submitted to histopathological analysis. The histopathological analysis of the sentinel lymph nodes collected during surgery was performed in a sequential manner. First, frozen sections were analyzed during surgery. The lymph nodes considered negative by frozen section were analyzed by H&E staining. Subsequently, the slides considered negative with H&E were sent for immunohistochemical analysis. Lymphoscintigraphy identified at least one sentinel lymph node in all patients. Sentinel node biopsy detected metastases in 20 patients (27.2%). In all cases the lymph node basins identified during lymphoscintigraphy were found to have at least one sentinel lymph node during surgery. Frozen section analysis of the lymph node was only able to identify the disease in 35% of the patients eventually found to have micrometastases with H&E and immunohistochemistry. Two lymph nodes were negative with H&E and positive with immunohistochemical analysis. In conclusion, lymphoscintigraphy is a simple procedure that is well tolerated by patients. It is useful in locating sentinel lymph nodes in patients with melanoma and is an important tool in the clinical practice of oncology. We recommend performing H&E, and if necessary, immunohistochemical analysis of all sentinel lymph nodes because of the high rate of false negative results with frozen sections alone.     

Follow-up of cases with false-negative pathologic sentinel nodes in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The clinical practice of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients started in 1999 in our hospital, to obviate unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection. The present study examines the pathological false-negative cases on intraoperative sentinel lymph node investigations and evaluates their outcomes. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 183 cases with clinically node-negative breast cancer who had undergone sentinel node biopsy. When the sentinel node was noted to contain malignant cells intraoperatively, a complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed subsequently. The patients with tumor free sentinel nodes underwent no further axillary surgery. The pathological false-negative cases in this series were defined as patients with lymph node involvement which was revealed postoperatively, despite negative intraoperative sentinel node examinations. After these surgeries and/or adjuvant therapies, interval clinical evaluations were performed for all patients. RESULTS: Intraoperative diagnosis of the sentinel node was 96.2% accurate compared with the results of permanent sections. There were six pathological false-negative cases, a false-negative rate of 4.1%, all of which had only micrometastasis. Five cases received systemic adjuvant therapy and have been disease-free, however, one patient who refused further therapy developed infraclavicular lymph node metastasis two years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of the patients with postoperatively revealed sentinel node micrometastasis, systemic adjuvant therapies might reduce local relapse without secondary lymph node dissection.     

Sentinel node-guided evaluation of drainage patterns for melanoma of the helix of the ear

The head and neck region, and especially the ear and its helix, is notorious for its ambiguous pattern of lymphatic drainage. Therefore, the primary nodal drainage basins in melanoma of the helix of the ear are often unpredictable. The aim of the study was to examine the value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma of the helix of the ear and to describe the natural history of the disease. Fifteen consecutive patients (14 men) with primary melanoma of the helix of the ear (median thickness, 1.2 mm; range, 0.7-10.0) underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, followed by intraoperative lymphatic mapping, using blue dye in combination with a hand-held gamma probe and sentinel lymphadenectomy. The melanomas were characterized by low mitotic rate, low lymphocytic infiltrate, low spontaneous-regression rate, and mostly epitheloid cell type. In one patient, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy failed to demonstrate the draining nodes. The sentinel lymph nodes were identified and retrieved in all patients during surgery. In 13 patients (87%), they were found in the upper jugular lymphatic basin (level IIA); none were found in the retroauricular region. All sentinel lymph nodes were tumor-negative. At a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 12-73), all 15 patients were disease-free. In conclusion, sentinel lymph node biopsy for helix melanoma is an excellent alternative to elective lymph node neck dissection and superficial parotidectomy, with a high success rate and low morbidity. Melanoma of the helix of the ear has an indolent natural history.     

The microanatomic location of metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes predicts nonsentinel lymph node involvement.

PURPOSE: Sentinel node biopsy is now widely accepted as the most accurate prognostic indicator in melanoma, and is important in guiding management of patients with clinical stage I or II disease. Patients with a positive sentinel node have conventionally undergone completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) of the involved basin, but only 20% have involvement beyond the sentinel node, suggesting that CLND may be unnecessary for the other 80% of patients. This study seeks to identify criteria that might be used to be more restrictive in selecting those who should undergo CLND. METHODS: A total of 146 patients were identified who had had a positive sentinel node biopsy for malignant melanoma. Their sentinel nodes and lymphadenectomy specimens were re-evaluated pathologically. The metastatic melanoma in each sentinel node was assessed according to its microanatomic location within the node (subcapsular, combined subcapsular and parenchymal, parenchymal, multifocal, or extensive), and this was correlated with the presence of involved nonsentinel nodes in the CLND. The depth of the metastases from the sentinel node capsule was also recorded. RESULTS: The metastatic deposits in the sentinel node were subcapsular in 26.0% of patients. None of these patients had any nonsentinel nodes involved on CLND. In the patients whose sentinel node metastases had a different microanatomic location, the rate of nonsentinel node involvement was 22.2% overall. CONCLUSION: The microanatomic location of metastases within sentinel nodes predicts nonsentinel lymph node involvement. In patients with only subcapsular deposits in the sentinel node, it is possible that CLND could safely be avoided.     

Feasibility and morbidity of sentinel lymph node detection in patients with vulvar carcinoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and the morbidity of sentinel lymph node detection in patients with vulvar carcinoma. In 15 patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, the inguinal sentinel lymph nodes was detected using both peritumoral injection of technetium-99m sulfur colloid and isosuflan blue before the surgical time. The detection of the inguinal sentinel lymph node was never completed by an inguinal lymphadenectomy. In case of metastatic lymph node, patients were treated by complementary inguinal irradiation. A total of 19 inguinal node dissection were performed. The sentinel lymph node was identified in 18/19 (94.7%) groin dissections. A total of 38 sentinel lymph nodes were removed. 4 patients were found to have metastatic lymph node (26.7%) with a total of 6 metastatic lymph nodes. The postoperative morbidity was minimal, with only one patient presenting a permanent edema of the extremity (6.7%) after complementary inguinal irradiation. We confirm the results of previous studies that sentinel node dissection appears to be technically feasible in patients with vulvar carcinoma. This may reduce the morbidity of usual inguinal lymphadenectomy without under-evaluate the nodal status. This procedure could be implemented in future therapy concepts.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now a widely implemented technique for evaluating the axilla in women with early stage breast carcinoma. Men who develop breast carcinoma are at similar risk as their female counterparts of developing the morbidities related to axillary dissection. SLNB is aimed at preventing these morbidities. In this study, the authors evaluated the role of SLNB in the treatment of men with early stage breast carcinoma. METHODS: Among the 1692 patients who underwent SLNB at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 16 men with breast carcinoma were identified. The charts and records of these 16 patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 57.2 years. The mean tumor size was 1.3 cm. In 15 of 16 patients (93.75%) and in all patients with T1 tumors, one or more sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified. SLNB failed in one patient, who had a T2 tumor (3 cm). Ten of the 15 patients had negative sentinel lymph nodes (66.7%). Four of these patients had no additional lymph nodes removed, whereas six patients had additional lymph nodes removed, all of which were negative. Two patients (13.3%) had positive sentinel lymph nodes on frozen-section analysis and underwent immediate completion axillary dissection: Both had additional positive lymph nodes. Three patients (20.0%) had positive sentinel lymph nodes on further sectioning or immunohistochemistry, and two patients underwent completion axillary dissection: Neither patient had additional positive lymph nodes. The third patient had one immunohistochemically positive lymph node and did not undergo completion axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB for patients with breast carcinoma was as successful in men as it has been shown to be in women and may be offered as a management option to men with early stage breast carcinoma by surgeons who are experienced with the technique.     

Sentinel node biopsy in early vulvar cancer

Lymph node pathologic status is the most important prognostic factor in vulvar cancer; however, complete inguinofemoral node dissection is associated with significant morbidity. Lymphoscintigraphy associated with gamma-probe guided surgery reliably detects sentinel nodes in melanoma and breast cancer patients. This study evaluates the feasibility of the surgical identification of sentinel groin nodes using lymphoscintigraphy and a gamma-detecting probe in patients with early vulvar cancer. Technetium-99m-labelled colloid human albumin was administered perilesionally in 37 patients with invasive epidermoid vulvar cancer (T1-T2) and lymphoscintigraphy performed the day before surgery. An intraoperative gamma-detecting probe was used to identify sentinel nodes during surgery. A complete inguinofemoral node dissection was then performed. Sentinel nodes were submitted separately to pathologic evaluation. A total of 55 groins were dissected in 37 patients. Localization of the SN was successful in all cases. Eight cases had positive nodes: in all the sentinel node was positive; the sentinel node was the only positive node in five cases. Twenty-nine patients showed negative sentinel nodes: all of them were negative for lymph node metastases. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel-node biopsy under gamma-detecting probe guidance proved to be an easy and reliable method for the detection of sentinel node in early vulvar cancer. This technique may represent a true advance in the direction of less aggressive treatments in patients with vulvar cancer.