共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 10 毫秒
1.
2.
– | Because treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients can be frustrating to the clinician and patient as well, the physician should strive to gain the patient’s confidence with a concise, appropriate work-up and by offering reassurance and education that IBS is a functional disorder without significant long-term health risks. |
– | First-line treatment should be aimed at treating the most bothersome symptom. |
– | Tricyclic antidepressants are superior to placebo in reducing abdominal pain scores, as well as improving global symptom severity [1••]. |
– | Loperamide is superior to placebo in managing IBS-associated diarrhea [2••]. |
– | Whereas fiber has a role in treating constipation, its value for IBS or, specifically, in the relief of abdominal pain or diarrhea associated with IBS is controversial [2••]. |
– | Although certain antispasmodics have demonstrated superiority over placebo in managing abdominal pain, none of these agents are available in the United States [3••]. |
– | Probiotic therapy using Lactobacillus plantarum has demonstrated superiority to placebo in improving pain, regulating bowel habits, and decreasing flatulence [4]. |
– | As studied in a recent placebo-controlled prospective study, Chinese herbal medicines significantly improved bowel symptom scores and global symptom profile, and reduced IBS-related quality of life impairment [5]. |
– | Some of the most promising emerging therapies in IBS revolve around targeted pharmacotherapeutic modulation of serotonin receptors (ie, 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 subtypes), which are involved in sensory and motor functions of the gut. Other investigational agents that are also being explored include cholecystokinin antagonists, α2-adrenergic agonists (eg, clonidine), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (eg, citalopram), and neurokinin antagonists [6]. |
– | IBS is best understood through the biopsychosocial paradigm, and therefore, its effective management requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach based on patient education and reassurance, enhanced by diet recommendations and lifestyle modifications, and complemented by pharmacotherapy and psychosocial intervention in more severe cases. |
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Uday C Ghoshal 《Gut and liver》2022,16(3):331
Following acute gastroenteritis (AGE) due to bacteria, viruses, or protozoa, a subset of patients develop new onset Rome criteria positive irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), called postinfection IBS (PI-IBS). The pooled prevalence of PI-IBS following AGE was 11.5%. PI-IBS is the best natural model that suggests that a subset of patients with IBS may have an organic basis. Several factors are associated with a greater risk of development of PI-IBS following AGE including female sex, younger age, smoking, severity of AGE, abdominal pain, bleeding per rectum, treatment with antibiotics, anxiety, depression, somatization, neuroticism, recent adverse life events, hypochondriasis, extroversion, negative illness beliefs, history of stress, sleep disturbance, and family history of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), currently called disorder of gut-brain interaction. Most patients with PI-IBS present with either diarrhea-predominant IBS or the mixed subtype of IBS, and overlap with other FGIDs, such as functional dyspepsia is common. The drugs used to treat non-constipation IBS may also be useful in PI-IBS treatment. Since randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of drugs to treat PI-IBS are rare, more studies are needed on this issue. 相似文献
8.
Gwee KA 《Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology》2001,4(4):287-291
Opinion statement
相似文献
– | Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) should be considered in patients who present with a change in bowel habits or an onset of new abdominal pain or discomfort following a recent confirmed or presumed exposure to infectious organisms, or in those who have recently returned from a tropical or developing country. |
– | In patients who are greatly distressed by their symptoms, an extended workup early in the course of their illness may give physician and patient confidence in focusing on IBS. |
– | The author favors a proactive, multicomponent approach to management, as it gives the physician and patient a sense of control. |
– | Treatment should include stress management, dietary advice to minimize exposure to trigger foods, and pharmacotherapy to alleviate anxiety and target disturbed physiology. |
9.
10.
Peter R. Evans Young-Tae Bak Borys Shuter Radmil Hoschl John E. Kellow 《Digestive diseases and sciences》1997,42(10):2087-2093
Alterations in both gastric emptying (GE) andsmall bowel motility have been reported in irritablebowel syndrome (IBS); the relationship, however, betweenthese different measures of upper gut motor function in IBS has not been assessed. The aims of thisstudy were therefore: (1) to compare the prevalence andcharacteristics of altered small bowel motility in IBSpatients with and without delayed GE; and (2) to assess the interrelationships betweenfasting and postprandial small bowel motility in IBS,accounting for delayed GE. Forty-four IBS patients and25 healthy controls underwent 24 hr ambulant recording of interdigestive and digestive small bowelmotility. On a separate occasion the IBS patients had GEof both solids and liquids measured by a dual-isotopescintigraphic technique. Thirty-nine percent of IBS patients had delayed GE. Patients withnormal GE had no interdigestive small bowelabnormalities. However, in patients with delayed GEfasting phase II burst frequency was higher than incontrols [median 0.21/hr (IQR 0.15–0.34) vs 0.06/hr(0–0,16), P = 0.004]. Postprandially, abnormalphase III-like activity was higher indiarrhea-predominant IBS patients (0–0.08/hr vs0/hr, P = 0.01), than in patients with normal GE or controls. Furthermore, IBSpatients with delayed GE did not have the normalcorrelation between fasting and postprandial motorparameters (percentage occurrence of clusteredcontractions, postprandial pattern duration vs preceding MMC cyclelength). In conclusion, small bowel motor dysfunctionoccurs more frequently in IBS patients with concomitantgastroparesis than in patients with normal GE. These findings provide further evidence that aneuropathic process may contribute to the pathogenesisof IBS in a subgroup of IBS patients. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
Jun DW Lee OY Yoon HJ Lee HL Yoon BC Choi HS Lee MH Lee DH Kee CS 《Digestive diseases and sciences》2005,50(9):1688-1691
Extraintestinal symptoms are often found in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Recent studies suggest that IBS
is associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness. But it is still arguable that the bronchial hyperresponsiveness is associated
with IBS patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the possible relationship between IBS and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
Forty-two patients with IBS and 42 control subjects were included in this study. All patients underwent pulmonary function,
methacholine challenge, and skin prick tests. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with respect to percentage
of all pulmonary function test parameters, including FEV1%, FCV%, FVC/FEV1, and FEF25 − 75%. Only two persons in the alternating-type IBS patient group and one person in the control group tested positive in the methacholine
provocation test. But all PC20 values were above 16 mg/ml. These results do not demonstrate a relationship between bronchial hyperresponsiveness and IBS.
However, a relationship might exist in a subpopulation of IBS patients. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.