The role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in distinguishing pancreatic cystic lesions

Distinguishing mucinous from nonmucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas often constitutes a diagnostic dilemma. The clinical management differs between such lesions; therefore it is important to make an accurate preoperative diagnosis. Various centers have reported conflicting results regarding their ability to detect mucin-producing neoplastic cells and appropriately reach a diagnosis based on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided FNA. The aim of this study is to assess the ability of EUS-FNA cytology to diagnose and differentiate mucinous from nonmucinous pancreatic cystic lesions. We reviewed records of patients who underwent EUS of pancreatic cystic lesions. If FNA was performed and mucinous neoplasm was suspected, aspirate was evaluated for cytomorphology and presence of mucin. FNA results were compared to final histologic diagnosis if surgery was performed.Cytologic diagnosis was provided for 28/30 (93%). By comparing EUS-FNA diagnoses with final surgical pathology, FNA accurately diagnosed in 10/11 cases with sensitivity and specificity for detection of malignancy of 100 and 89, respectively, while the accuracy for identification of mucinous cystic neoplasms was 100%. Our results indicate that in the appropriate clinical and imaging setting, EUS-FNA cytology with analysis for mucin production by tumor cells is an important test in distinguishing pancreatic cystic lesions and guiding further management.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration: Clinicopathologic features of 60 patients

Diagnosis of lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures is possible using an imaging modality, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a suitable and cost-effective technique for obtaining cytohistologic material to confirm the diagnosis. EUS is capable of both characterizing the lesion and then guiding the FNA under real-time (RT) ultrasound guidance using a through-the-scope needle aspiration system. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of this technique and to describe the clinicopathologic features. Sixty patients underwent EUS-guided RTFNA of 64 lesions, including pancreas (n = 45), periluminal lymph nodes (n = 12), mediastinal and retroperitoneal masses (n = 4), and hepatobiliary masses (n = 3). Follow-up data were obtained by surgery, histopathology, or clinical course. Thirty-one lesions were malignant, eight were atypical/suspicious, 16 were non-neoplastic, and nine were non-diagnostic. Of the 55 lesions with sufficient material for interpretation, 54 had follow-up confirmation of the RTFNA diagnosis. The calculated sensitivity and specificity for malignancy was 90% and 100%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was excellent for gastrointestinal associated lymph nodes (100%), mediastinal and retroperitoneal masses (100%), somewhat less so for pancreatic tumors (94%), and poor for hepatobiliary lesions (33%). EUS-guided RTFNA is accurate for sampling small gastrointestinal tract–associated lesions. EUS-guided RTFNA should be considered as a procedure of choice in selected patients when the results will influence management decisions. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1998; 18:98–109. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Evaluation of performance of EUS-FNA in preoperative lymph node staging of cancers of esophagus, lung, and pancreas

We reviewed the cytologic and histologic diagnoses and EUS report of 77 consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-FNA preoperative staging for esophageal, lung, and pancreatic cancers at our institution. A total of 122 EUS-FNA lymph nodes were identified. Thirty of 77 cases had histologic follow-up. Using surgical node staging and/or surgical resection as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were 75%, 95%, 89%, 86%, and 90%, respectively, for EUS-FNA node staging. We compared cytologically malignant and benign lymph node groups with eight EUS parameters including the total number of lymph nodes found by EUS, the shape, margin, long axis, short axis, echogenicity, location of the lymph node, and EUS tumor staging. We found that the short axis is the best EUS feature to predict malignancy. Lymph nodes found in an abdominal location in esophageal and lung cancer are likely malignant.     

A correlation study on diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes with histological and clinical diagnoses, the UCLA Medical Center experience

Endoscopic ultrasound guided (EUS) FNA procedure has two aspects, the endoscopic sampling and the FNA interpretation. The two aspects of the procedure are performed in two different disciplines; gastroenterology (EUS) and pathology (FNA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV).Sixty-one EUS-FNA procedures of the lymph nodes were analyzed by correlating the FNA results with histological or clinical diagnoses. The lymph nodes were divided in five groups; mediastinal, gastrohepatic, peripancreatic, portal, and perirectal.The study showed a concordance of 92% in mediastinal, 80% in gastrohepatic, 81% in peripancreatic, 95% in portal, and 100% in perirectal lymph nodes with an overall sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 88%, and NPV of 89%. In conclusion, EUS-FNA offers an invaluable approach for diagnostic examination of the internal lymph nodes where percutaneous FNA is either difficult or impossible. impossible.     

Diagnosis of deep-seated lymphoma and leukemia by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy

We retrospectively studied the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) as a tool for the diagnosis of deep-seated lymphoma. An on-site assessment at the time of EUS-FNAB was performed by a cytopathologist using Diff-Quik (American Scientific Products, McGraw Park, IL) stain. In addition, Papanicolaou stains were performed on EUS-FNAB smears, immunohistochemical stains were performed on cell blocks, and additional samples were sent for flow cytometric analysis. Final cytologic diagnosis was correlated with surgical pathology and/or clinical follow-up. We evaluated EUS-FNAB specimens of deep-seated lymph nodes, spleen, stomach, and pancreas, and 1 EUS-guided needle core biopsy specimen of a lymph node. Thirteen cases of deep-seated lymphoma were diagnosed, including non-Hodgkin lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphoma. One case of hairy cell leukemia was diagnosed. EUS-FNAB is a minimally invasive, cost-effective, and useful tool for the primary diagnosis or staging of deep-seated lymphomas.     

Fine needle aspirations in oncology

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an established highly accurate and cost effective method for diagnosing lesions in different organs, both superficial and deep seated. The method is minimal invasive without unwanted side effects and the skepticism by clinicians has been overcome by its high accuracy and minimal discomfort to the patient. The most frequent organs examined by FNAC are the breast, lung, thyroid, lymph nodes, abdominal masses and soft tissue tumors. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC depends on several factors, including site and type of lesion, the experience of the aspirator, quality of preparation and diagnostic scills of cytopathologist. FNAC is usually performed palpation guided but ultrasonography guidance has become more widely used the recent years. With FNAC it is easy to obtain fresh material of deep-seated lesions that is well suited for immunocytochemistry and different molecular techniques i.e. PCR, FISH, flowcytometry and cytogenetics. This is usually performed using radiographic image guidance or in combination with endoscopy (EUS, EBUS).     

Diagnostic usefulness and challenges in the diagnosis of mesothelioma by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm. It has been noted in the literature that fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a useful tool for the diagnosis of mesothelioma. However, the differential diagnosis may require use of a battery of immunohistochemical stains. Clinico-radiologic correlation is also crucial. Real time endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) combined with FNA has been shown to be a very sensitive technique to obtain samples from different organ sites, including mediastinal lesions. The use of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of mesothelioma, reinforces the role of a cytopathologist as a cohesive team player along with a radiologist and a clinician during on-site assessment for the proper triage of additional specimens for ancillary studies leading to a better patient management.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of metastatic alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma to the pancreas with fluorescence in situ hybridization: a case report

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) is a rare tumor in adults. Cytologic diagnosis of metastatic ARMS to the pancreas diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been reported rarely in the literature. A 20-year-old male with a history of ARMS in the right maxillary sinus resected one year earlier and pancreatitis treated two months earlier, presented on routine follow-up. Abdominal positron electron tomography-CT scan revealed a mass in the pancreas and fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the left paraaortic lymph node. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen showed a 3.6 × 6.4 cm mass in the tail of the pancreas. EUS-FNA was performed using a 22-gauge needle. Cytologic criteria and immunohistochemistry in the smears were analyzed. A diagnosis consistent with metastatic ARMS was rendered. Subsequent FISH analysis of the case and histologic review of the primary tumor supported the final diagnosis. A diagnosis of metastatic ARMS to the pancreas can be made by EUS-FNA. FISH can be used as an ancillary technique in diagnosing the tumor.     

内镜超声对54例异位胰腺的诊治分析

目的探讨内镜超声（EUS）对异位胰腺的诊断治疗意义。方法收集2005年6月至2009年5月经普通胃镜及EUS共检出的54例异位胰腺患者,其中男性28例,女性26例;年龄19～76岁,中位年龄49岁。回顾性分析异位胰腺的EUS图像特征及随访观察。结果在EUS下异位胰腺均表现为隆起型病变,可发生于胃壁任何一层或多层,以黏膜下层多见,呈低、中或混合回声。51例随访观察无特异性症状,其中33例内镜复查病变大小无改变。9例（≥15mm）局限于黏膜下层以内行内镜下切除者术后均无并发症。结论 EUS对异位胰腺有重要的诊断价值且内镜下治疗安全有效;异位胰腺恶变罕见,对于无症状且直径较小的异位胰腺可长期随访观察。     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes: the Hennepin County Medical Center experience

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) allows for the sampling and diagnosis of lesions of the gastrointestinal system and adjacent tissues. It has also proved helpful with the sampling of lymphadenopathy both for the staging of malignancy and for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy of other causes. We review our experience with EUS-guided FNA of lymph nodes. The cytology files were searched at Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) for all cases of lymph nodes sampled by EUS. Clinical history, biopsy site, diagnosis, and follow-up information (including ancillary testing) were reviewed. Between January 1, 2000 and December 5, 2002, 217 lymph nodes from 185 different patients were sampled by EUS at HCMC. Biopsy sites included 62 mediastinal, 9 paraesophageal, and 146 intra-abdominal lymph nodes. Diagnoses were as follows: metastatic non-small cell carcinoma (n = 69); benign, reactive lymph node (n = 76); granulomatous lymphadenopathy (n = 18); malignant lymphoma (n = 7); atypical-suspicious for malignancy (n = 5); metastatic small cell carcinoma (n = 2); necrotic debris (n = 4), and foreign material (n = 1); 35 cases were nondiagnostic (16.1%) in 22 of 185 patients (11.9%). Ancillary tests including flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and cultures were performed. EUS-guided FNA of mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymph nodes provides diagnostic material from which ancillary testing may be performed.     

Providing on-site diagnosis of malignancy on endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates: should it be done?

BACKGROUND: Rapid and accurate tissue diagnosis for a deep-seated malignancy would allow treating physicians to provide disease-specific interventions and help patients make early informed management decisions. Providing on-site tissue diagnosis for fine-needle aspirate samples obtained with endosonography would help develop such efficient patient management issues. Here we report our experience of prospectively providing on-site diagnosis on 485 endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspirate samples. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-five endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspirates from the pancreas (n= 305), lymph nodes (n = 91), biliary tree (n = 47), liver (n = 15), gastrointestinal tract (n = 19), and adrenal gland (n = 8) were reviewed. For all aspirates, the cytologic diagnoses, both preliminary and final, were categorized into the following: positive for malignancy, positive for neoplastic process, suspicious for malignancy, atypical cells, reactive process, and nondiagnostic. RESULTS: Of the 485 cases, 163 (33.6%) were diagnosed as benign, 43 (8.8%) as atypical, 21 (4.3%) as suspicious, 18 (3.7%) as positive for neoplasm, and 230 (47.4%) as malignant after final cytologic interpretation. A significantly (P < .001) higher degree of concordance was noted for unequivocal diagnosis of malignancy (196/198, 98.9%) vs nonmalignancy (200/250, 67.2%) between on-site and final cytologic diagnosis. Of the 52 discordant cases, 12 (2.6%) diagnoses were downgraded and 40 (8.9%) were upgraded from preliminary on-site diagnosis. Our overall sensitivity (87 vs 92), specificity (95% vs 100%), and accuracy (90% vs 94%) improved for final cytologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: On-site diagnosis of malignancy could be used to initiate informed patient management decisions. Cases where a diagnosis of malignancy is not rendered at on-site interpretation need further cytologic evaluation.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is useful for nodal staging in patients with pleural mesothelioma

Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and negative N2 stage lymph nodes may benefit from extrapleural pneumonectomy with adjuvant therapy. The objective of this study is to describe the use of EUS-FNA to determine N2 stage status in patients with mesothelioma and its impact in the management of such patients. Six patients (mean age, 62 yr; median age, 63 yr; range, 52-70 yr; 5 men; 1 woman) underwent EUS-FNA for staging of N2 lymph nodes from July 2000 to July 2006. Follow-up included operative notes, treatment summaries, and surgical pathology. Eight sites were aspirated: four subcarinal lymph nodes, three aorto-pulmonary window lymph nodes, and one paraesophageal mass. Two of 8 (25%) aspirates were positive for metastatic disease in two different patients. Two false negative EUS-FNAs were observed and were attributed to sampling error not diagnostic error. No complications were observed. EUS-FNA is a safe N2 node staging technique in patients with mesothelioma. A positive N2 lymph node by EUS-FNA may be a contraindication to definitive surgery in patients with malignant mesothelioma.     

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors: a retrospective analysis

Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor (IPMT) of the pancreas has become the accepted terminology for a group of mucin-producing epithelial proliferations lying within ectatic segments of the main pancreatic duct or its large branches. These neoplasms generally are associated with an indolent course, characteristic endoscopic ultrasonographic (EUS) findings, and a variable histo- and cytomorphology ranging from hyperplasia to carcinoma. Cytological specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided or percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are characterized by a background containing abundant mucin in which are entrapped single or loosely cohesive clusters of neoplastic cells characteristically showing a goblet-cell morphology. The degree of nuclear atypia, cell crowding, and cell shape varies between smears within a single case and between cases. Cytomorphological examination, when coupled with EUS features, is accurate for the diagnosis of these lesions but often it underdiagnoses the grade of the neoplasm.     

Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy--a potential pitfall

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is considered to be a reliable and accurate method for the evaluation of submucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Herein, we report our experience with the diagnosis of 10 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) using EUS-FNA. The materials obtained from the EUS-FNA were stained with the rapid Romanowsky or the Papanicolaou method for cytologic examination. The subsequent surgical resection specimens were submitted for histopathologic examination. Immunoperoxidase stains were performed on the cell blocks and/or representative histologic sections of the tumor using commercially available antibodies against c-kit (CD117), CD34, S-100, and smooth muscle actin. Of the 10 cases studied, there were five men and five women with an average age of 62 years (range, 38 to 87 years). Five tumors were located in the stomach, and five in the duodenum. Tumor size ranged from 3.5 to 16.2 cm. Immediate on-site evaluation and cytologic diagnoses were given in eight cases (80%) with an average of three passes. The diagnoses were confirmed by strong and diffuse tumor cell c-kit immunoreactivity in the cell blocks. However, the final diagnoses of two other cases (20%) were not established until surgical resections were obtained. Retrospectively, reviews of cytologic smears of both cases demonstrated rare cohesive sheets or clusters of spindle cells with cigar-shaped nuclei. These observations were initially misinterpreted as benign fibrous tissue and/or fragments of smooth muscle of the gastrointestinal wall such as one might encounter in a routine transgastric or transduodenal EUS-FNA. The current study showed that when combining cytologic and immunocytochemical studies, EUS-FNA is accurate and efficient in the diagnosis of GIST. It exemplified the importance of considering GIST in the differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal lesions and also demonstrated the potential pitfalls of EUS-FNA evaluation of submucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.     

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in lymph nodal and mediastinal lesions: a multicenter experience

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an established procedure in lung cancer (LC) staging and in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses. Most of the experiences reported refer to single specialized centers where dedicated teams of endoscopists and pathologists perform the procedure. We report the EUS-FNA experience of a cooperation group involving clinicians and cytopathologists from three hospitals. Fifty-seven consecutive EUS-FNA of mediastinal nodes in LC patients, eight mediastinal and two subdiaphragmatic masses were collected in 3 years. EUS-FNA was performed by two endoscopists and three experienced pathologists. On-site evaluation was performed in all cases by the three cytopathologists. Lymph node negative cases underwent surgery, which confirmed the cytological diagnoses but also detected two false negatives. Four of the 10 EUS cytological diagnoses of mediastinal and subdiaphragmatic masses were histologically confirmed. All EUS diagnoses were blindly reviewed by three pathologists to assess intra and interpersonal reproducibility. FNA-EUS diagnoses were: 10 inadequate (17%), 10 negative (17%), 4 suspicious (7%) and 33 positive (59%). Diagnoses of mediastinal and subdiaphragmatic masses were: relapse of lung carcinoma (3), mesenchimal tumor not otherwise specifiable (3), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (1), esophageal carcinoma (2) and paraganglioma (1). The sensitivity attained was 85% and the specificity 100%; revision of the slides demonstrated a significant diagnostic reproducibility of the three cytopathologists (P < 0.5). The sensitivity and specificity attained were similar to those reported in the literature suggesting that experienced cytopathologists and endoscopists from different institutions can employ the same procedure reaching comparable results.     

Bcl-2 expression in pancreas development and pancreatic cancer progression

Apoptosis is important for both tissue development and differentiation; its deregulation may contribute to tumourigenesis. In order to clarify the role of Bcl-2, an apoptosis-inhibiting protein, in pancreatic morphogenesis and tumour progression, its immunohistochemical expression was evaluated in 12 samples of fetal pancreas, in 10 samples of adult pancreas with ductal hyperplastic lesions, in 120 cases of primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and in 43 synchronous metastatic lymph nodes. To evaluate the role of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer, p53 expression was also studied in tumour samples. Bcl-2 cytoplasmic acinar and ductal immunostaining was found in all fetal and adult tissue samples; ductal hyperplastic lesions were constantly negative. Thirty out of 120 (25%) tumours and 3 out of 43 (7%) lymph nodes expressed Bcl-2, whereas 67 out of 120 (56%) expressed nuclear p53. Well-differentiated tumours (G1) were more frequently Bcl-2-positive (p=0.002); furthermore, there was an inverse correlation between Bcl-2 and p53 expression in primary tumours (p=0.02). Neither Bcl-2 nor p53 influenced patients' prognosis, which was instead affected by N (p=0.02) and M (p<0.0001) status and stage of the disease (p=0.002). It is concluded that Bcl-2 regulates pancreatic morphogenesis and tissue homeostasis from early fetal to adult life and can be considered a phenotypic marker of normal exocrine pancreas. On the other hand, the lack of expression in preneoplastic lesions and the low positivity found in primary tumours and lymph node metastases suggest that Bcl-2 does not play a centralrole in pancreatic tumourigenesis and cancer progression.     

The diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound‐guided needle biopsy in lung cancer and mediastinal adenopathy

Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) has emerged as a new diagnostic tool that allows the bronchoscopist to see beyond the airway, including pulmonary and mediastinal lesion. The real time EBUS‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has advanced the diagnostic yield in primary lung pathology and mediastinal lymph node staging of lung carcinoma. Sixty‐four patients (36 males, 28 females, ages ranging from 16 to 86 years) with peribronchial lung lesions and mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node lesions underwent EBUS‐TBNA. All patients had intraoperative cytological assessment by smears on aspiration samples or touch preparation on needle core biopsies. The cytological final diagnoses were categorized as negative, suspicious/positive, and non‐diagnostic. Forty‐nine samples were obtained from lymph node lesions and 15 samples were obtained from lung lesions. In cytology specimens, 32 patients had suspicious/positive diagnoses and 32 patients had negative diagnosis. In follow‐up histology specimens, 35 patients had malignant diagnoses, including 18 adenocarcinomas, 8 small cell carcinomas, 6 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 metastatic melanoma, and 1 lymphoma. Twenty‐nine patients had negative diagnoses. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% and 96.4%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97.0% and 87.1%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 92.2%. EBUS‐TBNA is an efficient and effective technique for diagnosis of intrapulmonary and mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes. It becomes significantly invaluable on clinical management for staging in those patients with lung cancer of other metastatic malignancies. This technique enables us to obtain tissue samples for quick diagnoses beyond central airway with minimal complications. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic mesenchymal tumors by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration

Involvement of the pancreas by metastatic sarcoma is rare, and can prove challenging to differentiate from sarcomatoid carcinomas which occur more commonly. The endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) technique has been successfully used for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinomas whether primary or metastatic, and is now considered the most effective noninvasive method for the identification of pancreatic metastases. However, to date very few reports detail the diagnosis of mesenchymal neoplasms by EUS‐FNA. Herein, we report a series of four patients who underwent EUS‐FNA of the pancreas, where the diagnosis of metastatic sarcoma was made based on morphology and ancillary studies. The cases include metastases of leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, and solitary fibrous tumor. The history of a primary sarcoma of the chest wall, mediastinum, and respectively lower extremity was known for the first three of these patients while in the case of the solitary fibrous tumor a remote history of a paraspinal “hemangiopericytoma” was only elicited after the EUS‐FNA diagnosis was made. We conclude that EUS‐FNA is efficient and accurate in providing a diagnosis of sarcoma, even in patients without a known primary sarcoma, thus allowing institution of therapy without additional biopsies. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic and staging tool for rectal and perirectal lesions—an institutional experience

The role of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in evaluating lesions adjacent to the upper gastrointestinal tract wall is well established. However, this tool is underused in evaluating rectal and perirectal lesions, possibly due to insufficient experience and underrecognized value of this procedure. In this study, we report our institutional experience with EUS-FNA as a diagnostic and staging tool for rectal and perirectal lesions. A retrospective chart review was performed and a cohort of 38 patients who underwent rectal EUS-FNA (41 specimens) at our institution between January 2002 and July 2012 was retrieved. The cytology diagnoses were compared with the concurrent or follow-up histologic and clinical diagnoses. Among the total 41 cases, rectal EUS-FNA was performed as a diagnostic procedure in 22 (54%) and a staging procedure in 19 (46%) cases. On cytology examination, 18 cases (44%) were diagnosed as malignant; 1 (2%), as atypical/suspicious for malignancy; 3 (7%), as benign neoplastic; 13 (32%), as nonneoplastic; and 6 (15%), as nondiagnostic cases. Concurrent or follow-up histologic diagnoses were available in 20 cases (48%), 19 of them had concordant cytological/histologic findings (10 benign, 9 malignant). One perirectal lymph node with negative cytology diagnosis was found to be positive on histologic examination, probably due to sampling error on cytology. The sensitivity and specificity of EUS-FNA for detecting malignant rectal/perirectal lesions in this study were 91% and 100%, respectively. Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration is a useful diagnostic tool for rectal/perirectal lesions; it confirms or excludes malignancy for lesions with high or low clinical suspicions. It serves as a reliable staging method to identify patients for proper clinical management.     

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the islet cell tumor of pancreas: a comparison between computerized axial tomography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy

The objective of the present study is to compare the cytologic features of islet cell tumor (ICT) of pancreas obtained by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and computed tomography guided FNA (CT-FNA). We also describe the cytologic features associated with malignant ICT. Eleven cytology samples from 121 CT- FNA and 30 EUS- FNA of the pancreas were obtained from nine patients with ICT. Diff-Quik, Papanicolaou, and immunohistochemical stains to determine neuroendocrine differentiation and the hormonal status were evaluated. Cytologic features and specimen adequacy were compared between the two techniques. Cytologic features noted in both benign and malignant ICT were also compared. Nine patients (5 men, 4 women) ranging in age from 29 to 84 years (mean age, 53.8 years). Diagnoses consisted of benign (4) and malignant (5) ICT. EUS-FNA was superior to CT-FNA in obtaining adequate cells (2/2 v 7/9) for the diagnosis and increased cellularity to perform additional immunohistochemical stains (2/2 v 4/7). Single, plasmacytoid cells with finely granular chromatin distribution characterized ICT on cytology. Mitoses (3/5) and necrosis (1/5) were noted in malignant ICT but not in benign ICT. EUS-FNA is superior to CT- FNA for obtaining cells for the diagnosis of ICT. Detection of mitoses and or necrosis from patients with ICT should initiate a search for metastasis.