Resection versus palliation: treatment of stage III and IVA carcinomas of the pancreas employing intraoperative radiation

Abstract Whether advanced pancreatic carcinomas should be surgically removed has been a basic issue because performing an extended resection is futile if it has only a minimum impact on survival. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of pancreatic resection with those of a bypass operation for patients with stage III or IVA pancreatic carcinomas while applying intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). The therapeutic outcomes of 132 patients who had received IORT for stage III or IVA carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 68 patients with locally unresectable tumors who underwent a bypass operation; group 2 included 64 patients with resectable tumors who underwent pancreatic resection. Postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was also delivered to 90 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that strong independent predictors of increased survival were EBRT for group 1 (p < 0.0001) and R0 resection for group 2 (p = 0.017). Twenty patients who had been subjected to R0 resection showed the best survival, with a 3-year survival rate of 45%. The survival of group 1 patients receiving EBRT (n = 47) nearly equaled that of group 2 patients undergoing R1 or R2 resection (n = 44) (p = 0.72); but group 1 patients with tumors ≤ 6 cm (n = 31) had a better survival rate than group 2 patients with tumors > 3 cm (n = 28) (p = 0.03). We concluded that postoperative EBRT is essential for improving the survival outcome, even after administering IORT. Patients with stage III lesions undergoing an R0 resection and receiving IORT demonstrated an excellent 3-year survival. A bypass operation plus IORT in combination with EBRT is preferred over IORT used as an adjuvant to R1 or R2 resection. Electronic Publication     

Radiofrequency ablation combined with palliative surgery may prolong survival of patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas

Background and aim The aim of this study is to identify the benefit acquired by the use of radiofrequency ablation in parallel to palliative therapy in patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas. Materials and methods Data on 25 consecutive patients who underwent palliative therapy with or without radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic cancer were included in this retrospective review. Thirteen patients received palliative therapy alone, whereas 12 patients received palliative therapy plus radiofrequency ablation. Results Overall mean survival rate in patients receiving paliative therapy alone was 13 months and the maximum survival was 30 months. Where radiofrequency ablation was applied, mean survival was estimated at 33 months (p = 0.0048). Stage III and IV patients treated with palliative therapy alone have a mean survival of 15 and 10 months, respectively. All stage III patients receiving radiofrequency ablation are alive at present and maximum survival has reached 38 months (p = 0.0032), whereas stage IV patients who were treated with radiofrequency ablation have an estimated mean survival period of 14 months (p = 0.1095). Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation in parallel to palliative therapy seems to provide survival benefit especially for stage III patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Further studies should be conducted to determine the usefulness of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy for resectable and unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

Eighty patients with pancreatic carcinoma were treated by intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with or without surgical resection of the tumor, and the results were compared with those of 111 patients treated by surgery alone. For resectable patients, the radiation dose was 30 Gy and the average field sizes were 8 or 10 cm; for unresectable patients, these values were 20–30 Gy and 6 or 8 cm, respectively. No side effects of IORT were observed. In 49 resectable stage III patients, the IORT group (n=16) had a higher survival rate than the non-IORT group (n=33); i.e., 1-year survival rates of 44.6% vs 23% and 2-year survival rates of 37.2% vs 7.7% after surgery (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in survival rate between the IORT group (n=28) and the non-IORT group (n=29) in 57 resectable patients in stage IV. In unresectable patients, the IORT group (n=31) (P<0.05) had a higher survival rate than the non-IORT group (n=38) (P<0.05). The palliative effect of IORT on abdominal or back pain was evaluated in 15 patients who had such symptoms and did not undergo tumor resection. Overall, pain decreased or disappeared in 13 of these patients (87%). Offprint requests to: A. Nakao     

Does Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Improve Local Tumor Control in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma? A Propensity Score Analysis

Background  Locoregional recurrence (LRR) is an important factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) administered to the resection bed may improve local tumor control. Methods  We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PD at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH) between 1995 and 2005 to identify patients who underwent resection with and without IORT. Data collected included age, gender, complications, margin status, stage, survival, and recurrence. Unadjusted analyses of the IORT and non-IORT groups were performed using Fisher’s chi-square method for discrete variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. To account for biases in patient selection for IORT, a propensity score was calculated for each patient and adjusted statistical analyses were performed for survival and recurrence outcomes. Results  Between January 1995 and November 2005, 122 patients underwent PD for periampullary tumors, including 99 pancreatic cancers. Of this group, 37 patients were treated with IORT, and there was adequate follow-up information for a group of 46 patients who underwent PD without IORT. The IORT group contained a higher percentage of Stage IIB or higher tumors (65%) than in the non-IORT group (39.1%), though differences in stage did not reach significance (P = .16). There was a nonsignificant decrease in the rate of LRR in patients who had IORT (39% non-IORT vs. 23% IORT, P = .19). The median survival time of patients who received IORT was 19.2 months, which was not significantly different than patients managed without IORT, 21.0 months (P = .78). In the propensity analyses, IORT did not significantly influence survival or recurrence after PD. Conclusions  IORT can be safely added to management approaches for resectable pancreatic cancer, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. IORT did not improve locoregional control and did not alter survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. IORT is an optional component of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer. In the future, IORT may be combined with novel therapeutic agents in the setting of a clinical trial in order to attempt to improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer. Presented as Poster Presentation at the American Hepatico-Pancreato-Biliary Association, April 2008, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.     

Total or Subtotal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma? A Study of Quality of Life

de principe in the treatment of gastric carcinoma, wherever the tumor may be sited in the stomach, remains controversial. The advocates of TG contend that when it can be performed safely, with relatively low operative mortality and morbidity, it yields better long-term survival than STG. Most surgeons, however, believe that the routine use of TG increases both operative mortality and morbidity and the risk of nutritional deficiency in the long term, without improving survival. TG may also be associated with poorer outcome in terms of quality of life (QOL), but the evidence for this is tenuous. Forty-seven consecutive patients who had undergone potentially curative (R0) gastric resection for carcinoma were studied: 26 had undergone TG and 21 STG. A radical D2 lymph node dissection had been performed in each, and all patients were free from recurrence at the time of the study. QOL was measured before operation and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation by means of five questionnaires to measure functional outcome: the Rotterdam symptom checklist (RSCL), the Troidl index, the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale, activities of daily living score, and Visick grades. Before operation there was no significant difference in QOL between the two groups of patients. At 1 year after operation, however, patients who had undergone STG had a significantly better QOL than patients who had undergone TG: Their median RSCL score was lower (10 versus 19 respectively, p < 0.05), and their Troidl index was higher (11 versus 9 respectively, p < 0.05). The QOL of patients who underwent STG was also significantly better after operation than it had been before operation, whereas the QOL of the TG group was not significantly better after operation than before operation. The QOL of patients was found to be significantly better after STG than after TG for gastric carcinoma. Because operative mortality is greater and long-term survival is no better after TG than after STG, the latter is recommended as the treatment of choice for tumors of the distal stomach.     

Improved Outcome With Cytoreduction Versus Embolization for Symptomatic Hepatic Metastases of Carcinoid and Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background Few data exist regarding outcomes after resection versus embolic treatment of symptomatic metastatic carcinoid and neuroendocrine tumors. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cytoreduction provides any benefit over embolic management of diffuse neuroendocrine tumors. Methods A prospective database of 734 patients treated at our institution was retrospectively queried for symptomatic metastatic tumors treated with embolization or cytoreduction. Patients were compared with regard to pretreatment performance status, relief of symptoms, and survival. Results A total of 120 patients were identified: 59 undergoing embolization and 61 undergoing cytoreduction. Twenty-three patients had palliative cytoreduction (gross residual disease). Pretreatment performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) was similar for both groups: .7 ± .70 (embolization) versus .8 ± .72 (cytoreduction; P = .27). Complete symptomatic relief was observed in 59% and partial relief in 32% of patients who underwent embolization, with a mean symptom-free interval of 22 ± 13.6 months. A total of 69% of patients who underwent cytoreduction had complete symptomatic relief, and 23% had partial relief (P = .08 vs. embolization). The mean duration of relief was 35 ± 22.0 months (P < .001 vs. embolization). The mean survival for the patients who underwent embolization was 24 ± 15.8 months versus 43 ± 26.1 months for those who underwent cytoreduction (P < .001). Survival in patients who underwent palliative cytoreduction was 32 ± 18.9 months (P < .001 vs. embolization), whereas it was 50 ± 27.6 months in patients who underwent curative resection (P < .001 vs. embolization; P < .001 vs. palliative). Conclusions Cytoreduction for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors resulted in improved symptomatic relief and survival when compared with embolic therapy in this nonrandomized study. Cytoreduction should be pursued whenever possible even if complete resection may not be achievable. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Is palliative resection necessary for gastric carcinoma patients?

Background and aims The benefit of palliative resection for gastric carcinoma patients remains controversial. We thus evaluated the survival benefit of palliative resection in advanced gastric carcinoma patients. Materials and methods We reviewed the hospital records of 466 gastric carcinoma patients who had palliative resection and compared the clinicopathologic findings to those of patients who underwent a bypass or exploration from 1986 to 2000. Results Cox’s proportional hazard regression model revealed only one independent statistically significant prognostic parameter, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (risk ratio, 0.739; 95% confidence interval, 0.564–0.967; P < 0.05). The 5-year survival rate of patients who had palliative resection was higher than that of patients who did not (7.03 vs 0%, P < 0.001). When the 5-year survival rates of patients with peritoneal dissemination were examined, the rate was higher for those who underwent resection (4.43 vs 0%, P < 0.001). Conclusion The results highlight the improved survivorship of gastric carcinoma patients with palliative resection compared to those who did not undergo the procedure. Although curative resection is not possible in this group of patients, we recommend performing resection aimed at palliation.     

Laparoscopic gastro- and hepaticojejunostomy for palliation of pancreatic cancer

Background: Most patients presenting with pancreatic cancer are irresectable at the time the diagnosis is made. Therefore, they are in need of palliative treatment that can guarantee minimal morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. To address this need, we designed a study to test the feasibility of laparoscopic gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy and to compare their results with those achieved with open techniques. Methods: We performed a case control study of a new concept in laparoscopic palliation based on the findings of preoperative imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy. Laparoscopic side-to-side gastroenterostomy and end-to-side hepaticojejunostomy (Roux-en-Y) were done in irresectable cases. Of 14 patients who underwent laparoscopic palliation, three had a laparoscopic double bypass, seven had a gastroenterostomy, and four underwent staging laparoscopy only. The results were compared with a population of 14 matched patients who had conventional palliative procedures. Results: Postoperative morbidity was 7% vs 43% for laparoscopic and open palliation, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no mortalities in the laparoscopic group, as compared to 29% in the group who had open bypass surgery (p < 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay averaged 9 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group (p < 0.06). Operating time tended to be shorter in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.25). Morphine derivatives were necessary for a significantly shorter period after laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.03). Conclusions: Our preliminary experience strongly suggests that laparoscopic palliation can reduce the three major drawbacks of open bypass surgery—i.e., high morbidity, high mortality, and long hospital stay. Received: 24 February 1999/Accepted: 13 May 1999     

The role of surgery in the treatment of recurrent gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to determine the role of surgery in the treatment of recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Of the 347 patients with recurrent gastric cancer, 61 patients (17.8%) who underwent surgery were evaluated retrospectively. The underlying causes and types of surgery, survival, and postoperative quality of life were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common cause of surgery was intestinal obstruction due to carcinomatosis. Complete resection was possible in 15 patients (24.6 %), including 10 gastric remnant recurrences, and 2 hepatic and 3 ovarian metastases. The survival of patients who had complete resection was significantly longer than the other groups (52.2 months for complete resections, 13.1 months for palliative procedures, and 8.7 months for laparotomy alone, respectively) (P < .05). The median hospital-free survival (HFS) durations were 9.4, 2.9, and 2.2 months for incomplete resection, bypass/enterostomy, and laparotomy only, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment in recurrent gastric cancer is rarely indicated; however, if complete resection could be accomplished, long-term survival can be expected. Bypass surgery for symptom palliation did not increase the HFS.     

Undertreatment of Gallbladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis

Background

Gallbladder cancer has a high mortality rate and an increasing incidence. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend resection for all T1b and higher-stage cancers. This study aimed to evaluate re-resection rates and the associated survival impact for patients with gallbladder cancer.

Methods

Patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004–2015). Re-resection was defined as definitive surgery within 180 days after the first operation. Propensity scores were created for the odds of a patient having a re-resection. Patients were matched 1:2. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods.

Results

The study identified 6175 patients, and 466 of these patients (7.6%) underwent re-resection. Re-resection was associated with younger median age (65 vs 72 years; p?<?0.0001), private insurance (41.6% vs 27.1%; p?<?0.0001), academic centers (50.4% vs 29.7%; p?<?0.0001), and treatment location in the Northeast (22.8% vs 20.4%; p?=?0.0011). Compared with no re-resection, re-resection was associated with pT stage (pT2: 47.6% vs 42.8%; p?=?0.0139) and pN stage (pN1-2: 28.1% vs 20.7%; p?<?0.0001), negative margins on final pathology (90.1% vs 72.6%; p?<?0.0001), and receipt of chemotherapy (53.7% vs 35.8%; p?<?0.0001). The patients who underwent re-resection demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the patients who did not undergo re-resection (median OS, 44.0 vs 23.0 months; p?<?0.0001). After propensity score-matching, re-resection remained associated with superior survival (median OS, 44.0 vs 31.0 months; p?=?0.0004).

Conclusions

Re-resection for gallbladder cancer is associated with improved survival but remains underused, particularly for early-stage disease.

     

Value of Nonpalliative Resection as a Therapeutic and Pre-Emptive Operation for Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Introduction  The value of nonpalliative resection in metastatic gastric cancer has not been clearly defined. Methods  The survival and incidence of subsequent palliative interventions in 72 patients with metastatic gastric cancer who underwent nonpalliative resection were retrospectively compared with those of 56 patients that did not undergo resection. Results  The median survival of patients who underwent resection was greater than that of patients who did not (12.0 months versus 4.8 months; p = 0.000). However, more patients in the resection group had a good performance status, no neighboring organ invasion, and only one metastatic site, and this might have caused the survival difference. Adjuvant chemotherapy was the only independent predictor of survival after resection. Incidences of subsequent palliative procedures were not significantly different in the two study groups (43.1% in resection group versus 39.3% in the nonresection group; p = 0.668). However, the mean interval between operation and the first procedure was significantly different in the two groups (287.3 days in the resection group versus 164.1 days in the nonresection group; p = 0.032). Conclusions  The survival of the patients that underwent nonpalliative resection was poor, and nonpalliative gastrectomy did not decrease requirements for subsequent palliative procedures. Only a few patients with a favorable response to adjuvant chemotherapy survived longer after resection and benefited from a longer symptom-free period until the subsequent palliative procedures were required. Nonpalliative resection should be reserved for selected patients based on performance status, resection feasibilities and metastatic tumor loads, and adjuvant chemotherapy should be combined as part of multimodality therapy.     

Long-Term Survival After Complete Resection of Melanoma Metastatic to the Adrenal Gland

Background: Survival of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma is generally poor, although there are occasional long-term survivors who have undergone surgical resection of a limited number of metastases. In the study, we examined the outcome of patients with adrenal gland metastases.Methods: Eighty-three patients with adrenal metastases were identified from our computerized melanoma database of 8250 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival differences were performed by using proportional hazards modeling.Results: Median survival for the 83 patients was 9.3 months (1–67 months). Of the 27 patients who underwent surgical exploration, 18 (66%) were rendered clinically free of disease by adrenalectomy alone (12 cases) or by adrenalectomy and resection of additional disease (6 cases). Nine patients underwent palliative adrenal resection. Median survival was 25.7 months after complete resection compared with 9.2 months after palliative resection (P = .02). Conclusions: Patients with adrenal metastases from melanoma, either isolated or with a limited number of additional metastases, may benefit from surgical resection if all visible disease can be removed. Patients with unresectable extra-adrenal disease achieve no survival benefit from adrenalectomy.Presented at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, California, March 26–29, 1998     

Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Background: CA 19-9 levels are useful for the diagnosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, interest has recently turned toward its use as a prognostic indicator. The purpose of this study is to determine whether postoperative CA 19-9 levels predict disease-free survival (DFS) and median survival (MS) in patients after resection. Methods: Between 1988 and 1996, 40 patients underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and were evaluated with postoperative CA 19-9 assays. Eight patients had low preoperative levels of CA 19-9 (<2) and were excluded. Results: CA 19-9 levels are good predictors of DFS and MS. Patients whose postoperative CA 19-9 values normalized by 3 to 6 months (<37 U/ml) had longer DFS (24 vs. 10 months,p<0.04) and MS (34 vs. 13 months,p<0.04). Patients with postoperative CA 19-9 values less than 180 U/ml at 1 to 3 months had a similar DFS (19 vs. 5 months,p<0.0009) and MS (34 vs. 13 months,p<0.0001) compared to patients with normal values at 3 to 6 months. Conclusions: Postoperative measurements of CA 19-9 were the best predictors of DFS and MS. Values<180 U/ml at 3 months were as predictive as normal values by 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Consequently, CA 19-9 levels should be obtained for use as a stratification parameter in phase III trials.Presented at a plenary session for 50th Annual Cancer Symposium, The Society of Surgical Oncology, Chicago, Illinois, March 20–23, 1997.     

Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinomas: pivotal prognostic factors and impact of tumor sclerosis

The well-known poor prognosis of proximal bile duct cancer is due to its unfortunate anatomical location and its late diagnosis. Successful tumor resection, which is considered to be optimal treatment, depends on many factors. Eighty-eight patients suffering from proximal bile duct cancer underwent surgical exploration at our institution between 1977 and 1998. In 37 patients the tumor was resectable; in the remaining 51 patients exploratory laparotomy or a palliative operation was performed. The median survival after tumor resection was 18.6 months, but median survival after a palliative procedure or an exploratory laparotomy was only 3.4 months (p < 0.001). A curative R0 resection was possible in 11 patients, an R1 resection was performed in 22 patients, and 4 patients had an R2 resection. The median survival rate after R0 resection was 83.6 months, 12.3 months after R1 resection, and 2.7 months after R2 resection (p < 0.001). Survival after resection in patients with negative lymph nodes (n = 30) was significantly longer than in those with positive lymph nodes (n = 7) (p = 0.022). Grade of tumor sclerosis tended to have an influence on resectability rate (p = 0.076). The pattern of tumor growth was without statistical influence. Multivariate analysis revealed resection (p < 0.001) as the only significant prognostic marker for patient survival. Radical resection is the only therapy that provides a chance for long-term survival, with sclerosis of the cancer tending to have an influence on univariate analysis.     

Protein deficiency after gastric bypass: The role of common limb length in revision surgery

BackgroundBariatric surgery, especially the gastric bypass procedure, is an effective therapy for morbid obesity, but may reduce protein absorption and induce protein deficiency (PD). A recent study reported an issue about common limb length for PD.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the prevalence of PD after gastric bypass surgery and investigate the role of common limb length in PD-related revision surgery.SettingHospital-based bariatric center.MethodsFrom 2001 to 2016, 2397 patients with morbid obesity who underwent bariatric/metabolic surgery with 1-year follow-up were recruited. Serum albumin and total protein were measured before and 1 year after surgery. Medical records of patients who underwent revision surgery due to PD were reviewed.ResultsThe overall prevalence of PD was .5% preoperatively. The prevalence of PD increased to 2.0% at 1 year after surgery. The incidence was highest in one-anastomosis gastric bypass (2.8%) followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (1.8%). Until the end of follow-up, all 19 patients who underwent revision surgery for intractable PD had a relatively short common limb length of <400 cm. After elongation of the common limb length to >400 cm in revision surgery, PD improved in all patients.ConclusionsA subset of patients can develop PD after gastric bypass surgery when the common limb length is <400 cm. In patients with intractable PD after gastric bypass surgery, revision surgery for elongation of common limb length to >400 cm is mandatory to avoid PD-related complications.     

Adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: factors influencing long-term survival

This single-institution retrospective analysis reviews the management and outcome of patients with surgically treated adenocarcinoma of the duodenum. Between February 1984 and August 1996, fifty-five patients with adenocarcinoma of the duodenum underwent surgery at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Univariate analysis was performed to identify possible prognostic indicators. Curative resection was performed in 48 patients (87%): 35 of these patients (73%) underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), whereas 27% (n = 13) underwent a pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD). Patients undergoing PD were comparable to those undergoing PSD with respect to demographic factors, presenting symptoms, and tumor pathology. The remaining 13% of patients (n = 7) were deemed unresectable at the time of surgery and underwent biopsy and/or palliative bypass. PD was associated with an increase in postoperative complications when compared to PSD (57% vs. 30%), but this difference was not statistically significant. One perioperative death occurred following PD (mortality 2.9%), The overall 5-year survival rate for the 48 patients undergoing potentially curative resection was 53 %. Negative resection margins (P <0.001), PD (P <0.005), and tumors in the first and second portions of the duodenum (P <0.05) were favorable predictors of long-term survival by univariate analysis. Nodal status, tumor diameter, degree of differentiation, and the use of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy did not influence survival. These data support an aggressive role for resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the duodenum Presented at the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Washington, D.C., May 11–14, 1997.     

Determinants of Survival following Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

p = 0.0001), resected versus nonresected ( p < 0.0001), and tumor-free surgical margins versus positive margins ( p = 0.001). Surprisingly, the disease-free interval and the original stage of the primary tumor did not predict survival ( p = not significant). Other factors that had no influence on survival were type of resection, size and number of liver metastases, ABO blood group, and the number of perioperative blood transfusions. For those patients who underwent resection of unilobar metastases with tumor-free margins, the 5-year survival rate was 29% with a median survival of 35 months and eight survivors > 7 years. In addition, one patient with bilobar disease had survival > 7 years and five patients who had resection of hepatic metastases and extrahepatic cancer simultaneously had survival > 3 years. Our data support the concept that patients with unilobar metastatic disease who undergo surgical resection with tumor-free surgical margins can be afforded a significant opportunity at long-term survival with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. Also, certain patients with bilobar or extrahepatic disease (or both) who undergo complete resection can enjoy a long-term survival. In these subgroups of patients resection should be considered on an individual basis.     

Salvage abdominoperineal resection following combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus

Background: Up to one-third of patients with anal epidermoid cancer will fail initial chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) or have local recurrence after treatment. This study evaluates the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) experience with salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) in these patients. Methods: Thirty-eight patients who underwent salvage APR following 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C, and radiotherapy over the past 12 years were analyzed by retrospective review. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons by log-rank analysis. Results: The indications for APR were recurrent disease after CT-RT in 14 patients and persistent disease in 24 patients. Median follow-up time and survival were 47 and 41 months, respectively. The actuarial 5-year survival was 44%. Twenty-three patients had recurrent disease after APR. Inguinal lymphadenopathy at initial presentation (p<0.05), fixation of tumor to the pelvic sidewall (p<0.01), and pathologic involvement of the perirectal fat (p<0.01) adversely affected survival. Age, gender, initial response to CT-RT, initial stage of the primary tumor, histologic levator muscle involvement, status of perirectal lymph nodes, and extent of lymphadenectomy did not affect survival. Conclusions: Salvage APR can be expected to yield a moderate number of long-term survivors, but the high rate of disseminated failure suggests the need for additional postoperative treatment. Presented at the 46th Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, California, March 18–21, 1993.     

Trends in Survival and Surgical Methods in Patients Surgically Treated for Metastatic Spinal Tumors: 25-Year Experience in a Single Institution

BackgroundThis study aimed to examine trends in postoperative survival and surgical methods over a 25-year period in patients surgically treated for metastatic spinal tumors.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical treatment for metastatic spinal tumors between 1996 and 2020. For trend analysis, the study cohort was divided into three groups according to the year of surgery: 1996–2004, 2005–2012, and 2013–2020. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to examine survival, and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival of the top six common cancers among the periods. The surgical methods were grouped and examined as follows: fixation only, palliative decompression and fixation, gross total removal and fixation, and total en bloc spondylectomy.ResultsThis study included a total of 608 patients. There were 78 patients in 1996–2004, 236 in 2005–2012, and 294 in 2013–2020. Regarding the overall survival trend, the group 2013–2020 had a significantly improved survival as compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). According to specific cancer sites, significant survival improvement was observed in patients with lung, kidney, and breast cancers (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.022, respectively). There were no significant changes in the primary sites of the liver, colorectum, or prostate. Regarding surgical methods, the proportion of gross total tumor removal declined, whereas the proportion of palliative decompression and fixation and fixation only procedures increased.ConclusionsDuring the past 25 years, significant survival improvement was observed in patients with lung, kidney, and breast cancers. There was no improvement in survival in patients with liver, colorectal, and prostate cancers. In terms of surgical techniques, palliative decompression and fixation only procedures increased, while gross total tumor removal declined.     

Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Following Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Very Advanced Gastric Cancer

Background The survival of patients with stage IV gastric cancer is poor due to frequent peritoneal failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) after cytoreductive surgery on the long-term survival of these patients, as determined by residual disease status. Methods A total of 154 patients with stage IV gastric cancer were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent potentially curative or palliative resections. After surgery, the residual disease states of the patients were recorded. All patients received EPIC. Results Of all 154 patients, R0 resection was achieved in 37, R1 in 56, and R2 in 61. All patients received a mean of 4.3 EPIC perfusions. After a mean followup period of 29 months, 14 patients remained alive. The median survival of all 154 patients was 11.4 months. Survival times were analyzed according to the type of residual tumor; the median survival time was 25.5 months in the R0 group, 15.6 months in the R1 group, and 7.2 months in the R2 group (p < .001). Upon multivariate analysis, the residual tumor states and the cycle of EPIC perfusion were found to be independent prognostic predictors (p < .001 and p = .018, respectively). Conclusions The residual tumor status is the most important predictor for the survival of very advanced gastric cancer patients who received cytoreductive surgery and EPIC. Therefore, complete cytoreductive surgery yielding R0 resection is mandatory for achieving the beneficial effects of EPIC. J.-H. Cheong and J. Y. Shen contributed equally to this work.