Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or etomidate

In combination with fentanyl, propofol was compared with etomidate for total intravenous anaesthesia in 21 women (ASA Grades I-II) admitted for elective hysterectomy. They received either propofol (bolus 1.5 mg kg-1, infusion 9 mg kg-1 h-1 for 10 min thereafter 6 mg kg-1 h-1) or etomidate (bolus 0.10 mg kg-1, infusion 3 mg kg-1 h-1 reduced to 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1). Fentanyl 10 micrograms kg-1 was given for induction followed by an infusion of 30 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for 10 min reduced to 6 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for the first hour and successively reduced over time. Induction was smooth and maintenance easy to manage in both groups. There was no difference in time from end of infusion until extubation, but the time until the patients could report their date of birth was significantly shorter in the propofol group. Nausea and vomiting were more pronounced in the etomidate group, and mental side-effects were only seen after etomidate. After 3 months, more patients in the etomidate group complained of reduced power of concentration. We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with either propofol or etomidate is equally easy to manage, but in the recovery situation propofol was advantageous in time and quality.     

Comparison of propofol and methohexital for dental and maxillofacial surgery

A prospective study has been undertaken to compare a new intravenous anaesthetic agent, propofol, to methohexitone in 40 ASA I or II patients aged between 18 and 50 years undergoing maxillo-facial surgery and divided into two groups. Intramuscular premedication was standardized for all patients. In group I, propofol 2 mg X kg-1 was injected over 1 min in a peripheral venous line with fentanyl 0.86 microgram X kg-1, followed by an infusion of propofol 5 mg X kg-1 X h-1 and fentanyl 3 micrograms X kg-1 X h-1. In group II, the fentanyl dosage was the same as in group I, whilst methohexitone 3 mg X kg-1 was given for induction and 4.5 mg X kg-1 X h-1 for maintenance of anaesthesia. The following were recorded during induction, maintenance and recovery; haemodynamic parameters using a non invasive method; respiratory parameters; quality of anaesthesia; side-effects. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and qualitative analysis using the Schwartz comparison test at 2%. The following results were found: the quality of anaesthesia with propofol was superior to that of methohexitone during the three stages of anaesthesia. The duration of induction was similar in both groups, but the quality of induction (occurrence of more minor side-effects; p less than 0.05) and intubation was in favour of propofol (p less than 0.05). During maintenance, stability of anaesthesia and a lesser incidence of side-effects were again in favour of the propofol group, in which a slower rate was also found (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Propofol anaesthesia and metabolic acidosis in children

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effect of propofol infusion anaesthesia on acid-base status and liver and myocardial enzyme levels of children during short-term anaesthesia. METHODS: Thirty-six children, aged 3-12 years, were randomized into two groups. In group P (n = 18), induction and maintenance were performed with propofol, 3 mg x kg-1 and 20, 15 and 10 mg x kg-1 x h-1, respectively. In group H (n = 18) following induction with 5 mg x kg-1 thiopenthal, anaesthesia was maintained with 2-3% halothane. Blood samples were obtained following anaesthesia induction and 30, 60 and 120 min after discontinuation of anaesthesia. RESULTS: There was no difference in lactate dehydrogenase, myocardial creatininephosphokinase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and cholesterol levels between and within the groups. All postoperative triglyceride levels were higher and pH levels were lower in group P than group H (P < 0.05) and there was no difference within the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In these healthy patients, short-term use of propofol did not result in significant acidaemia, nor alterations in hepatic or myocardial enzyme levels.     

The effect of pre-induction glycopyrronium on the haemodynamic response of elderly patients to anaesthesia with propofol

This study investigated whether pretreatment with glycopyrronium can attenuate the hypotension caused by anaesthesia of the elderly with propofol. Twenty elderly patients (77.1 +/- 2.44 years, mean +/- SEM) of ASA physical status 2 or 3 scheduled for elective urological procedures were given glycopyrronium 0 (n = 10) or 5 micrograms.kg-1 (n = 10) in a randomised, double-blind manner, 5 min before induction of anaesthesia with propofol infused at 600 ml.h-1 (average induction dose 1.7 +/- 0.06 mg.kg-1, mean +/- SEM) followed by maintenance with a propofol infusion at 10 mg.kg-1.h-1. Although glycopyrronium significantly increased heart rate (p less than 0.01, ANOVA), the decrease in blood pressure 2 and 5 min after induction was similar in both groups. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 20 mmHg difference in systolic arterial pressure between treatment groups with p less than 0.05.     

Effects of propofol on intraocular pressure in surgery of strabismus in children

Propofol was assessed for eye surgery in 20 children. ASA group I or II, 2-14 year-old, randomly assigned to 2 equal groups. Premedication, analgesia and muscle paralysis were similar in both groups. Group P patients were given an induction dose of 4 mg.kg-1 propofol, followed by an infusion of 15 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first half hour, and then 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 to maintain anaesthesia. Group C patients were given 10 mg.kg-1 thiopentone for induction and halothane for maintenance. The quality of anaesthesia was assessed by monitoring adverse effects, heart rate, blood pressure, the length of anaesthesia, the delay of the first spontaneous breath and eye opening, and extubation. Intraocular pressure was measured before and 3 min after intubation, and 5 min after extubation. The quality of anaesthetic induction and maintenance were very similar in both groups. Pain occurred more frequently at the injection site with propofol (p less than 0.01). Children in group P recovered more quickly, and extubation was possible much earlier in this group (p less than 0.05). However, restlessness was significantly more frequent in group P (n = 9) than in group C (n = 1) (p less than 0.01). Systolic, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower in group P (p less than 0.05; 0.001; 0.001 respectively). No significant decrease in intraocular pressure in both groups was observed. The use of propofol for eye surgery in children is acceptable, despite some restlessness during recovery.     

The effect of magnesium sulfate administration on cerebral and cardiac toxicity of bupivacaine in dogs

The effect of acutely elevated serum magnesium on the CNS and cardiac toxicity of bupivacaine was studied. Anesthesia was induced in mongrel dogs with thiopental, 25 mg/kg, and ventilation was controlled. Sedation was maintained with fentanyl (25 micrograms/kg bolus and 5 micrograms.kg-1h-1) and pancuronium (0.15 mg/kg bolus and 0.05 mg.kg-1h-1) provided paralysis. Two hours after the thiopental bolus, all animals received an intravenous (iv) infusion of bupivacaine (1 mg.kg-1 min-1). The control group (5 animals) received bupivacaine only. The Mg++ group (5 animals) received MgSO4 140 mg/kg iv and 80 mg.kg-1 h-1 15 min prior to beginning the bupivacaine infusion. Lead II ECG, cardiac hemodynamics, and two-channel EEG were continuously monitored. Serum magnesium concentrations in the Mg++ group rose from 0.67 mM (1.3 mEq/L) to 2.42 mM (4.8 mEq/L). The bupivacaine infusion caused PR and QRS interval prolongation in both groups, but QRS widening was greater in the control group. QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTIc) lengthened only in the control group. A depression of left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) occurred to an equal extent in both groups. The seizure dose of bupivacaine was not different between the two groups: 12.9 +/- 2.3 (SEM) mg/kg in the control group and 13.9 +/- 2.5 mg/kg in the Mg++ group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recovery and discharge of patients after long propofol infusion vs isoflurane anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery

Fifty unpremedicated patients scheduled for outpatient restorative dentistry and/or oral surgery lasting 2 to 4 h were anaesthetized with either propofol infusion or isoflurane inhalation. Before induction of anaesthesia with propofol (2.5 mg.kg-1), all patients were given 75 mg of diclofenac and 0.01 mg.kg-1 vecuronium intravenously. Intubation was facilitated with suxamethonium (1.5 mg.kg-1) and anaesthesia was maintained in random order either with propofol infusion (12 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 20 min, 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the next 20 min, and 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the rest of the anaesthesia) or with isoflurane (inspired concentration 1-2.5%), both with nitrous oxide and oxygen (30%). The patients breathed spontaneously using a non-rebreathing circuit. Patients given propofol infusion became re-orientated faster (11.0 +/- 5.5 min vs. 16.5 +/- 7.5 min; P less than 0.01) and at 30 min walked along a straight line better (P less than 0.01). At 60 min, none of the propofol patients displayed an unsteady gait, whereas 11 of the 25 isoflurane patients did (P less than 0.001). None of the patients receiving propofol had emesis at the clinic, compared with 10 of the 25 patients receiving isoflurane (P less than 0.001). The overall incidence of emesis was 2 of 25 and 14 of 25 in the propofol and isoflurane groups, respectively (P less than 0.01). Patients receiving propofol were discharged home earlier than patients receiving isoflurane (80 +/- 14 min and 102 +/- 32 min, respectively; P less than 0.01). It is concluded that propofol allows early discharge of patients, even after long anaesthesias.     

General anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for outpatient urological surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A variety of drugs and techniques have been introduced into ambulatory anaesthesia. The technique as well as the drugs used may hasten or delay home discharge. We compared recovery profiles and side-effects of spinal anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia. METHODS: Forty unpremedicated ASA I-II patients (18-65 yr) undergoing varicocele repair were randomly divided into two groups. Spinal anaesthesia (26-G atraumatic needle) with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 5 mg and fentanyl 25 microg were given to patients in Group Spinal (n = 20). Patients in Group TIVA (n = 20) received total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil given by continuous infusion; a laryngeal mask was used to secure the airway. The duration of surgery, time to home readiness and side-effects were recorded. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to patients' characteristics and duration of surgery. The times to achieve ambulation were similar between groups (Spinal = 78.4 +/- 40.9 min, TIVA = 75.9 +/- 13.8 min). Urinary voiding was a requirement for discharge after spinal anaesthesia and the time for home readiness was longer in Group Spinal (158.0 +/- 40.2 versus 94.9 +/- 18.8 min) (P < 0.05). Two patients reported pruritus and one reported postdural puncture headache in Group Spinal, whereas two patients reported nausea in Group TIVA. Patients in Group TIVA had a greater need for analgesia postoperation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy unpremedicated men undergoing minor urological operations, total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol provided as safe and effective anaesthesia as spinal block with the advantage of earlier home readiness.     

Continuous propofol infusion versus enflurane in children operated on for strabismus. Comparison of the quality of anesthesia and recovery conditions

In children, the use of a continuous infusion of propofol has not yet been reported. A study was therefore designed to compare the characteristics of anaesthesia and recovery when either propofol or enflurance was used as the main anaesthetic agent. All 42 children (14 girls, 28 boys), ASA I and scheduled for corrective squint surgery under general anaesthesia, received 350 micrograms.kg-1 midazolam and 40 micrograms.kg-1 atropine intrarectally 20 min before induction, which was carried out with 3 mg.kg-1 propofol intravenously in 20 s. The patients were then randomly assigned to two groups, according to the drug used for maintenance: group P (n = 21) received a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol, 18 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 30 min and 15 mg.kg-1.h-1 thereafter; group E (n = 21) received 2.5%, then, after 30 min, 2% enflurane. Both groups were given 15 micrograms.kg-1 dextromoramide and 0.09 mg.kg-1 vecuronium. During anaesthesia, the following parameters were monitored: systolic (Pasys), diastolic (Padia) and mean arterial (Pa) pressures, heart rate (fc), the presence or not of an oculocardiac reflex with or without a 20% fall in fc which responded to 10-15 micrograms.kg-1 atropine, the appearance of a cardiac dysrhythmia, duration of anaesthesia and the delay before extubation. Recovery was assessed 1, 2, 4 and 6 h postoperatively by using both clinical and psychomotor criteria, the latter being adapted to children having one or both eyes occluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of total intravenous anaesthesia with midazolam/alfentanil on the adrenocortical and hyperglycaemic response to abdominal surgery

The effect of anaesthesia on the hyperglycaemic and adrenocortical response induced by surgery was studied in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. The study group was anaesthetized with midazolam and alfentanil using a totally intravenous anaesthetic technique. A reference group received anaesthesia with thiopentone, alfentanil and nitrous oxide. Midazolam 0.42 mg.kg-1 was given as a loading infusion followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.125 mg.kg-1.h-1. Alfentanil was given as a bolus dose of 0.075 mg.kg-1 in both groups, followed by a loading infusion of 0.3 mg.kg-1.h-1 for 15 min and a maintenance infusion of 0.065 mg.kg-1.h-1. Increments of alfentanil were given whenever heart rate or systolic blood pressure exceeded pre-induction values by more than 10%. During anaesthesia mean arterial pressure and heart rate were similar in both groups and there was no difference in alfentanil requirement. An immediate increase in blood glucose concentrations was seen following incision, but maximum concentrations were measured in the early postoperative period. Serum cortisol concentrations decreased after induction of anaesthesia. During surgery they returned to pre-induction values, and in the postoperative period they increased to about twice the pre-induction values. It is concluded that midazolam/alfentanil anaesthesia is as effective as anaesthesia induced by thiopentone, alfentanil and nitrous oxide in suppressing the stress-response to surgery until the postoperative period. No signs of prolonged adrenocortical depression were observed.     

Anaesthesia for myocardial revascularisation

We studied the effects on myocardial performance and metabolism of fentanyl/propofol and fentanyl/enflurane anaesthesia in 20 patients before coronary artery bypass grafting. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl 20 micrograms.kg-1 and pancuronium 0.15 mg.kg-1. Patients received, by random allocation, either propofol by infusion, 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 reduced by half after 10 min then adjusted as necessary (mean rate 2.8 mg.kg-1.h-1), or enflurane 0.8% inspired concentration for 10 min reduced to 0.6% and adjusted as required (mean 0.7%). Measurements were made before induction, after tracheal intubation, after skin incision and after sternotomy. There were no significant differences between the groups in any haemodynamic variables during the study. Following intubation both groups showed a rise in heart rate (p < 0.01) and cardiac index (p < 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance decreased after intubation (p < 0.05) then returned to baseline during surgery; stroke index was unchanged after intubation but was reduced during surgery (p < 0.01) as systemic vascular resistance increased. Regional and global coronary blood flow were maintained in both groups, as were myocardial oxygen consumption and lactate extraction ratio. However, lactate production did occur in one patient receiving enflurane and Holter monitoring confirmed ischaemia. One patient receiving propofol showed lactate production not accompanied by any ECG changes. This study suggests that propofol may be a suitable alternative to enflurane as an adjunct to opioids in anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Effect of pre-treatment with intravenous atropine or glycopyrrolate on cardiac arrhythmias during halothane anaesthesia for adenoidectomy in children

We studied the effect of anticholinergics on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias during paediatric anaesthesia. ASA I-II children (n = 77) undergoing adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to three groups. Intravenous atropine 0.02 mg kg-1 was given in group A (n = 25), glycopyrrolate 0.004 mg kg-1 in group G (n = 27) and physiological saline in group P (n = 25) 3 min before the induction of anaesthesia. The children breathed spontaneously under halothane anaesthesia with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen after induction with thiopentone and succinylcholine. Perioperative monitoring of the ECG (Holter recordings) and oxygen saturation was carried out. Ventricular tachycardia occurred in 16.0%, 18.5% and 12.0% of the children in groups A, G and P respectively (ns). The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular bigeminy, ventricular premature beats > 10) was 20.0% in group A, 44.4% in group G and 36.0% in group P (ns). Bradycardia (< 70 beats min-1) was observed in 0.0%, 14.8% and 24.0% of patients in groups A, G and P respectively (A vs P, P < 0.05). The use of anticholinergics did not influence the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during halothane anaesthesia in children. Bradycardia was more common in the placebo group than in the atropine group.      

Effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide and midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during sufentanil anaesthesia for major spinal surgery

Recording of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) enables monitoring of spinal cord function. We studied the effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide or midazolam during sufentanil anaesthesia on CSEP monitoring during major spinal surgery. Thirty patients with normal preoperative CSEP were allocated randomly to one of the following anaesthesia regimens: propofol (2.5 mg kg-1 followed by 10-6 mg kg-1 h-1) with or without nitrous oxide, or midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1 followed by 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1) combined with sufentanil 0.5 microgram kg- 1 h-1 in the propofol and midazolam groups, or 0.25 microgram kg-1 h-1 in the propofol-nitrous oxide group. CSEP were elicited by alternate right and left tibial posterior nerve stimulation and recorded before and after induction (15 min, 1, 2 and 3 h), and during skin closure. CSEP latencies were not significantly modified in the three groups. CSEP amplitude decreased significantly in the propofol-nitrous oxide group (from mean 2.0 (SEM 0.3) to 0.6 (0.1) microV; P < 0.05) but not in the propofol (from 1.8 (0.6) to 2.2 (0.3) microV) or midazolam (1.7 (0.5) to 1.6 (0.5) microV) groups. The time to the first postoperative voluntary motor response (recovery) delay was significantly greater in the midazolam group (115 (19) min) compared with the propofol and propofol-nitrous oxide groups (43 (8) and 41 (3) min, respectively). Consequently, the use of propofol without nitrous oxide can be recommended during spinal surgery when CSEP monitoring is required.      

Randomized comparison of recovery after propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopentone-isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery

A randomized, prospective study was performed to compare recovery characteristics in 41 ASA physical status I-II patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery with either propofol or thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia. Particular attention was focused on the recovery time needed to meet discharge criteria. The propofol group received propofol 2 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by propofol infusion (6-9 mg.kg-1.h-1) 1 min after intubation. The thiopentone-isoflurane group received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by isoflurane (0.5-2%) 1 min after endotracheal intubation. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar between the groups. The propofol group had significantly (P less than 0.05) faster clinical recovery than the isoflurane group with respect to times to response to commands, eye opening, orientation, ability to stand and void, tolerance to oral fluids, "home-readiness", and recovery of perceptual speed. Patients in the propofol group had significantly less (P less than or equal to 0.05) emesis than the patients given isoflurane. We conclude that in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery propofol infusion is preferable to thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia, because it may allow faster discharge home.     

The effect of lidocaine on neutrophil respiratory burst during induction of general anaesthesia and tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Respiratory burst is an essential component of the neutrophil's biocidal function. In vitro, sodium thiopental, isoflurane and lidocaine each inhibit neutrophil respiratory burst. The objectives of this study were (a) to determine the effect of a standard clinical induction/tracheal intubation sequence on neutrophil respiratory burst and (b) to determine the effect of intravenous lidocaine administration during induction of anaesthesia on neutrophil respiratory burst. METHODS: Twenty ASA I and II patients, aged 18-60 years, undergoing elective surgery were studied. After induction of anaesthesia [fentanyl (2 microg kg-1), thiopental (4-6 mg kg-1), isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.5-1.5%) in nitrous oxide (66%) and oxygen], patients randomly received either lidocaine 1.5 mg kg-1 (group L) or 0.9% saline (group S) prior to tracheal intubation. Neutrophil respiratory burst was measured immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia, immediately before and 1 and 5 min after lidocaine/saline. RESULTS: Neutrophil respiratory burst decreased significantly after induction of anaesthesia in both groups [87.4 +/- 8.2% (group L) and 88.5 +/- 13.4% (group S) of preinduction level (P < 0.01 both groups)]. After intravenous lidocaine (but not saline) administration, neutrophil respiratory burst returned towards preinduction levels, both before (97.1 +/- 23.6%) and after (94.4 +/- 16.6%) tracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation using thiopentone and isoflurane, inhibit neutrophil respiratory burst. This effect may be diminished by the administration of lidocaine.     

Comparison of propofol and propanidid administered at a constant rate

So as to compare the anaesthesia obtained using propofol with that obtained using propanidid, 40 ASA I patients, aged between 18 and 50 years, who were to undergo elective orthopaedic or plastic surgery lasting more than 60 min, were randomly divided into two equal groups, one receiving propofol (PF) and the other propanidid (PD). All the patients received 0.5 mg atropine, 100 mg pethidine and 7.5 mg droperidol (10 mg if weight greater than 60 kg) intramuscularly 45 min before induction. Patients in group PF were then given 2 mg.kg-1 propofol over 1 min and 0.9 microgram.kg-1 fentanyl over 3 min, followed by a constant rate infusion of 5 mg.kg-1.h-1 propofol and 3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 fentanyl. For PD patients, the doses of fentanyl were identical; they were given 10.6 mg.kg-1 propanidid over 3 min for induction, and 37 mg.kg-1.h-1 for maintenance. All the patients were intubated and ventilated mechanically. The usual anaesthetic parameters were monitored at induction, during surgery, and during recovery. Consciousness was lost more quickly with propofol (p less than 0.05), but the corneal reflex returned more rapidly in group PD (p less than 0.02). The time required for a full return to normal consciousness was identical in both groups. The fall, during induction, and the increase, during recovery, of Pasys were greater in group PD (p less than 0.05 and less than 0.001 respectively). Padia and heart rate were lower in group PF after the 30th min (p less than 0.05 and less than 0.01 respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of midazolam and propofol in combination with alfentanil for total intravenous anesthesia

Hemodynamic function during induction of anesthesia, the alfentanil and naloxone requirements, and the speed of recovery from total intravenous anesthesia with alfentanil/midazolam (group M, n = 10) or alfentanil/propofol (group P, n = 10) were compared in patients undergoing lower limb surgery. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 mg/kg propofol in 5 min followed by 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for 30 min and 4.5 mg.kg-1.h-1 until skin closure, or 0.42 mg/kg midazolam in 5 min followed by 0.125 mg.kg-1.h-1 until skin closure. Simultaneously, a variable-rate infusion of alfentanil was given. Patients were ventilated with 30% oxygen in air. In both groups blood pressure and heart rate decreased significantly (P less than 0.02) and to a similar extent during induction. The total dose of alfentanil was similar in both groups. No patient in group P and nine patients in group M needed naloxone (average dose 130 +/- 70 micrograms, P less than 0.001). Recovery, as judged by psychomotor tests (90% score was reached at 1 h in the P group and at about 4 h in the M group, P less than 0.001), sedative scores, and orientation in time and place, was shorter in group P than in group M. The conclusion is reached that propofol is superior to midazolam in total intravenous anesthesia with alfentanil.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol,alfentanil, and oxygen-air: three different dosage schemes

Three different dosage schemes of propofol infusions combined with a fixed-rate alfentanil infusion were investigated in total intravenous anaesthesia. In 30 premedicated patients, divided at random into three groups, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg.kg-1 immediately followed by an alfentanil infusion 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 as a loading dose which was decreased after ten minutes to a maintenance dose of 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg.kg-1 was used as the muscle relaxant. After induction of anaesthesia a propofol infusion 2 mg.kg-1.hr-1 was started in group A, 3 mg.kg-1.hr-1 in group B and 4 mg.kg-1 hr-1 in group C. At signs of light anaesthesia supplementary bolus doses of 20 mg propofol and 1 mg alfentanil were given. The patients' lungs were ventilated with air-oxygen (FIO2 0.35). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no statistical significant differences between the three groups. A significant (P less than 0.01) decrease of the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures was present after induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Recovery was uneventful in all but one patient, who had ventilatory depression that responded to naloxone (0.2 mg IV). Awareness did not occur in any patient. The only difference between the three groups was the higher number of supplementary bolus doses of propofol and alfentanil needed in group A (P less than 0.01). In total intravenous anaesthesia propofol 3 and 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1 as a maintenance dose combined with a two-step fixed-rate alfentanil infusion provided smooth anaesthesia and uneventful rapid recovery.     

Volatile induction and maintenance (VIMA) versus total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for minor gynaecological procedures

We compared the techniques of volatile induction and maintenance (VIMA) and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in various aspects. Patients undergoing spontaneous respiration-general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups; Group P received iv fentanyl 1 μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg for induction followed by propofol 10 mg/min as required. Group S received vital capacity induction with sevoflurane and were maintained on 66% N₂O in O₂ with sevoflurane 2%. Induction times, complications and recovery times were recorded. Visual analogue scores for pain and satisfaction were assessed. The two groups did not differ significantly in emergence times or VAS scores for pain and satisfaction but more complications like apnoea and injection pain were encountered during TIVA compared to VIMA. Our results suggest that both techniques are comparable in efficacy for providing anaesthesia in minor gynaecological surgery with swift induction, good recovery and minimal postoperative complications.     

Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery

We propose the use of an intravenous propofol/propofol auto-co-induction technique as an alternative to propofol/midazolam for induction of anaesthesia. We have studied 54 unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients undergoing day-stay anaesthesia for minor orthopaedic surgery. All received 10 micrograms.kg-1 or alfentanil before induction, followed by either midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, propofol 0.4 mg.kg-1 or saline, and 2 min later, a propofol infusion at a rate of 50 mg.kg-1.h-1 until loss of eyelash reflex. We compared pre- and postinduction haemodynamic changes, complications at insertion of a laryngeal mask airway and recovery from anaesthesia in the three groups. Both co-induction techniques showed less postinduction hypotension and significant reduction of the total induction dose of propofol when compared to the control group. In the propofol/propofol group there was a decreased incidence of apnoea during induction of anaesthesia. These patients were discharged from hospital 2 h after the end of anaesthesia whereas patients in the midazolam/propofol group were discharged after 2 1/2 h (p < 0.001).