Thrombolysis, stroke units and other strategies for reducing acute stroke costs.

Stroke is the leading cause of long term disability and the third leading cause of death in the US. Nearly $US40.9 billion (1997 values) are spent each year on direct and indirect stroke-related costs in the US alone. Length of hospital stay, hospital overheads and nursing-related and rehabilitation costs account for the majority of stroke-related expenditures. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy for patients presenting within 3 hours from onset of ischaemic stroke was shown to improve outcome at 3 months by the National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke (NINDS) investigators using a dosage of 0.9 mg/kg. When the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study results were examined using a Markov model, savings of $US4 to $US5 million (1996 values) per 1000 patients treated with rt-PA were projected. These savings were predicted to result from decreases in length of hospital stay, inpatient rehabilitation and nursing home costs, increases in the number of patients discharged directly to home and improvements in quality-adjusted life-years. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis has documented that the institution of stroke units, consisting of multidisciplinary specialised stroke teams, also decreased length of hospital stay, death and dependency. Because only a minority of patients who have a stroke are currently eligible for thrombolysis, implementation of specialised and standardised stroke care may further enhance cost benefits and improve patient outcomes.     

Acute medical costs of fluoxetine versus tricyclic antidepressants. A prospective multicentre study of antidepressant drug overdoses

Despite demonstrated differences in toxicity profiles between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), no studies have examined hospital costs associated with acute antidepressant overdoses. Given the high incidence of such overdoses, it is important to examine treatment patterns and associated costs. This prospective, multicentre cohort study compared the hospital and physician costs associated with TCA and fluoxetine drug overdoses. Over a 30-month period, 622 consecutive patients with a fluoxetine or TCA overdose presented to the emergency departments, or were admitted to intensive care or medical units, of 9 participating medical centres across the US. Inclusion criteria were: ingestion of a single antidepressant (fluoxetine or a TCA), without clinically significant co-ingestants; laboratory confirmation of the overdose; and retrievable hospital bills. Patients were followed until discharge from the emergency department or hospital. Hospital and physician charges were collected from billing data. Hospital charges were adjusted using Health Care Financing Administration cost: charge ratios to estimate costs; physician charges were adjusted to estimate costs. Patient demographic and clinical data were prospectively gathered during the course of medical treatment. Clinical data recorded included level of consciousness, cardiopulmonary complications, vital sign or ECG abnormalities, agitation, seizures, CNS depression and death. 136 patients (121 with TCA overdose and 15 with fluoxetine overdose), representing 21.8% of the 622 patients entered, met the inclusion criteria. Mean length of stay varied from 0.73 [+/-standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.33] days for fluoxetine overdose patients to 3.59 (+/-SEM 0.48) days for TCA overdose patients (p = 0.038). Mean hospital costs were $US668 for patients with a fluoxetine overdose compared with $US4691 for those with a TCA overdose (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed between the TCA and fluoxetine overdose groups with regard to physician costs. Median hospital and physician costs increased from $US3029 to $US4396 from the first 15-month period of the study to the second 15-month period of the study for the TCA overdose group, but decreased from $US881 to $US396 for the fluoxetine overdose group. Patients with fluoxetine overdoses had lower hospital and total medical costs compared with patients with TCA overdoses. There was some evidence supporting a reduction in the medical costs of treating fluoxetine overdoses over the 30-month study period.     

A multicentre, prospective study to evaluate costs of septic patients in Brazilian intensive care units

BACKGROUND: Sepsis has a high prevalence within intensive care units, with elevated rates of morbidity and mortality, and high costs. Data on sepsis costs are scarce in the literature, and in developing countries such as Brazil these data are largely unavailable. OBJECTIVES: To assess the standard direct costs of sepsis management in Brazilian intensive care units (ICUs) and to disclose factors that could affect those costs. METHODS: This multicentre observational cohort study was conducted in adult septic patients admitted to 21 mixed ICUs of private and public hospitals in Brazil from 1 October 2003 to 30 March 2004. Complete data for all patients admitted to the ICUs were obtained until their discharge or death. We collected only direct healthcare-related costs, defined as all costs related to the ICU stay.Enrolled patients were assessed daily in terms of cost-related expenditures such as hospital fees, operating room fees, gas therapy, physiotherapy, blood components transfusion, medications, renal replacement therapy, laboratory analysis and imaging. Standard unit costs (year 2006 values) were based on the Brazilian Medical Association (AMB) price index for medical procedures and the BRASINDICE price index for medications, solutions and hospital consumables. Medical resource utilization was also assessed daily using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28). Indirect costs were not included. RESULTS: With a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 61.1 +/- 19.2 years, 524 septic patients from 21 centres were included in this study. The overall hospital mortality rate was 43.8%, the mean Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 22.3 +/- 5.4, and the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at ICU admission was 7.5 +/- 3.9.The median total cost of sepsis was $US 9632 (interquartile range [IQR] 4583-18 387; 95% CI 8657, 10 672) per patient, while the median daily ICU cost per patient was $US 934 (IQR 735-1170; 95% CI 897, 963). The median daily ICU cost per patient was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors, i.e. $US 1094 (IQR 888-1341; 95% CI 1058, 1157) and $US 826 (IQR 668-982; 95% CI 786, 854), respectively (p < 0.001). For patients admitted to public and private hospitals, we found a median SOFA score at ICU admission of 7.5 and 7.1, respectively (p = 0.02), and the mortality rate was 49.1% and 36.7%, respectively (p = 0.006). Patients admitted to public and private hospitals had a similar length of stay of 10 (IQR 5-19) days versus 9 (IQR 4-16) days (p = 0.091), and the median total direct costs for public ($US 9773; IQR 4643-19 221; 95% CI 8503, 10 818) versus private ($US 9490; IQR 4305-17 034; 95% CI 7610, 11 292) hospitals did not differ significantly (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides the first economic analysis of direct costs of sepsis in Brazilian ICUs and reveals that the cost of sepsis treatment is high. Despite similar ICU management, there was a significant difference regarding patient outcome between private and public hospitals. Finally, the median daily costs of non-survivor patients were higher than survivors during ICU stay.     

Cost analysis of the treatment of severe spinal spasticity with a continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion system.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to analyse and evaluate the costs of continuous intrathecal baclofen administration as a modality in the treatment of severe spasticity in the Netherlands. DESIGN: A cost analysis was conducted as part of a prospective, multicentre, multidisciplinary, randomised and placebo-controlled clinical trial. The study covered the period from December 1991 to September 1995. The data on medical consumption and costs were collected over a 3-year period from different sources: administrative databases of health insurance companies, hospital registries and a patient survey. These data were structured by means of a flowchart analysis of the medical decision-making by specialists and general practitioners (GPs). They included data on in- and outpatient care, home care and care in nursing homes. The cost analysis was conducted using data from 18 patients included in the trial and from 15 so-called 'match' patients. The latter group are patients with comparable diseases leading to spasticity and living in comparable circumstances. Next to absolute costs (direct and indirect) of care and treatment for the 2 groups of patients, cost differences between the 2 groups were considered (differential cost analysis). SETTING: Per patient cost data, collected prospectively for 2 years during the phase of clinical evaluation, and retrospectively 1 year before implantation. The data were collected on patients from in- and outpatient care, home care and care in nursing home settings. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The trial patients (8 men) had a mean age of 46 years; 11 patients had multiple sclerosis and 7 patients had spinal cord injuries. The match patients (7 men) had a mean age of 48 years; 9 patients had multiple sclerosis and 6 patients had spinal cord injuries. INTERVENTIONS: Trial patients were treated with a subcutaneously implanted programmable continuous infusion pump (SynchroMed, Medtronic), filled with baclofen (a muscle relaxant) to treat patients with chronic disabling spasticity who did not respond to a maximum dose of oral baclofen, dantrolene and tizanidine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: An analysis of hospital stay between both groups showed a significant difference during the implantation year. The average number of hospital days per patient in the year in the treated group was 31.5 days and in the match group was 18.7 days. Significant cost differences between both groups in the year that started with pump implantation and the following year can be attributed mostly to the costs of implantation of the pump and related hospitalisation days. The total costs of patient selection, testing, implanting the pump and follow-up amounted to $US28,473 for the first year. Savings must be taken into consideration as well. The savings of direct costs were due to withdrawal of oral medication (estimated annual total of between $US1950 and $US2800 per patient). Indirect savings on employment and nursing home costs, amounted annually to $US1047 and $US5814, respectively. Scenarios make it possible to consider policy consequences. The case of 'extending' the indications for this treatment to a larger population has been calculated and visualised. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of the therapy (continuous intrathecal infusion of baclofen) can be attributed mostly to implantation of the pump and related hospitalisation days. Savings originated from withdrawal of oral medication, job preservation and avoidance or delay of admission to a nursing home.     

Economic evaluation of oral ofloxacin versus standard parenteral therapy in the treatment of pneumonia

The purpose of this study was to examine how inpatient use of oral ofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, affects utilisation of healthcare resources in the treatment of pneumonia. We collected data via chart review from a recent multicentre trial that randomised hospitalised adult patients with pneumonia to oral ofloxacin or standard parenteral therapy of the investigators' choice. We followed a total of 126 patients from randomisation until rule-out of pneumonia, death, loss to follow-up, or 30 days following cure, whichever occurred first. For each patient, we collected data on all inpatient antibiotic usage, duration of stay in hospital, and the utilisation of selected healthcare services following discharge from hospital. While length of stay did not differ between ofloxacin and standard-therapy patients (9.2 vs 11.1 days, respectively; p = 0.28), the cost of inhospital antibiotic therapy for those who received ofloxacin was one-fifth that of patients who were randomised to parenteral therapy ($US47 vs $US268). Costs of outpatient antibiotic therapy were slightly higher for the group receiving ofloxacin ($US26 vs $US3). No difference was noted in the rate of hospital readmission during follow-up. Our study therefore suggests that the use of oral ofloxacin among inpatients with pneumonia reduces the costs of antibiotic treatment compared to standard parenteral therapy.     

Cost-benefit analysis of risperidone and clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in Israel

In this study, the benefits and costs of treating schizophrenia with either risperidone or clozapine were examined. The lifetime drug-treatment cost incurred by a patient with schizophrenia in Israel was $US7561 (1996 values) with an initial 6-month trial with risperidone, compared with $US6326 with clozapine and $US3360 with typical antipsychotics. Total lifetime costs of psychiatric health services (excluding medications) by individuals who were continuously receiving typical antipsychotics were $US181,555 per patient. Assuming a 6.3% decrease in hospital use with typical antipsychotics and an absolute 30% decrease with risperidone or clozapine, the use of clozapine or risperidone reduced hospitalisation costs by $US7159 per patient, but increased community-care costs by $US1627 per patient, giving health-service benefit:cost ratios of 1.87:1 and 1.32:1, respectively. After adding indirect benefits resulting from increased work productivity (minus indirect costs related to increases in transport costs because of visits for blood monitoring during clozapine therapy), the benefit:cost ratios increased to 2.04:1 and 1.48:1, respectively. Assuming that clozapine caused a 30% decrease in hospital use by patients with new-onset schizophrenia, risperidone would have to decrease hospital use by 43.2% (i.e. a 13.2% relative advantage) for its societal benefits to justify its increased costs.     

Olanzapine versus risperidone. A prospective comparison of clinical and economic outcomes in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and economic outcomes associated with olanzapine and risperidone treatment for schizophrenia. DESIGN AND SETTING: An international, multicentre, double-blind, prospective study. To facilitate economic comparisons, our sample was restricted to patients enrolled in US sites. 150 patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder were randomised to therapy with either olanzapine 10 to 20 mg/day (n = 75) or risperidone 4 to 12 mg/day (n = 75) for a maximum of 28 weeks. In addition to tolerability and efficacy assessments, use of health services was assessed at baseline and prospectively, at 8-week intervals and at study completion. Clinically important response, defined as a 40% improvement in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, maintenance of response and rates of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms were compared between groups. Direct medical costs were estimated by assigning standardised prices to resource units. Median total, inpatient/outpatient service and medication acquisition costs were compared between treatment groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The mean modal dosages for the olanzapine and risperidone treatment groups were 17.7 +/- 3.4 mg/day and 7.9 +/- 3.2 mg/day, respectively. Olanzapine-treated patients were more likely to maintain response compared with risperidone-treated patients (p = 0.048). In addition, a smaller proportion of olanzapine-treated patients required anticholinergic therapy compared with risperidone-treated patients (25.3 vs 45.3%; p = 0.016). Total per patient medical costs over the study interval were $US2843 (1997 values) [36%] lower in the olanzapine treatment group than in the risperidone treatment group (p = 0.342). Medication costs were significantly higher for olanzapine-treated patients ($US2513 vs $US1581; p < 0.001), but this difference was offset by a reduction of $US3774 (52%) in inpatient/outpatient service costs for olanzapine-treated patients in comparison with risperidone-treated patients ($US3516 vs $US7291, p = 0.083). Median cost findings were consistent with results observed using other robust measures of central tendency and provide conservative estimates of potential savings that may be obtained from olanzapine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, olanzapine-treated patients experienced clinical improvements that translated into savings in costs of care for both inpatient and outpatient services. These savings offset the difference in medication acquisition cost between olanzapine and risperidone.     

The comparability of resource utilisation for Europeans and non-Europeans following stroke in New Zealand

AIMS: We sought to explore resource use both in hospital and the community twelve months after hospital discharge for patients of different ethnicity admitted to hospital with acute stroke. METHODS: Resource utilisation data were collected for consecutive patients admitted to each of three general hospitals in the Wellington region over a nine month period. Patients were interviewed, where possible, at three, six and twelve months after hospital discharge. Ethnicity was determined by self report. RESULTS: Non-Europeans had longer hospital stays than Europeans (median 36 days vs 18 days, p = 0.01). Contact with rehabilitation professionals in the community was low for all groups with no significant differences between Europeans and non-Europeans. For the entire cohort, spending on institutional care was around ten times higher than spending on community rehabilitation in the first twelve months following stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in hospital stay after stroke may reflect problems of access to inpatient rehabilitation services for younger people and not relate directly to the ethnicity of the patient. With the projected increasing proportion of Maori and Pacific people in the population, combined with the aging of that population, health policy-makers need to consider the implications of differences in resource utilisation for different ethnic groups in New Zealand. How to manage all the available resources for people with stroke to maximise outcome remains an important issue for health funders.     

Cost of treatment for onychomycosis. Data from a 9-month observational study

OBJECTIVES: To estimate component and total costs of treatment and to examine differences in cost and cost effectiveness between oral antifungal medication and local therapy for patients with toenail onychomycosis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of patients with onychomycosis who visited dermatologists and podiatrists in the US. Physicians provided data on clinical management, disease severity, nail improvement and resource utilisation. Patients completed questionnaires on resource utilisation and symptoms at base-line, 4 and 9 months. To estimate costs, reported utilisation was multiplied by unit costs expressed in 1997 US dollars ($US) and derived in 2 ways: first, using Medicare fees; and second, using standard physician fees. RESULTS: After adjustment for key demographic and clinical variables, participants receiving oral medication had higher total costs based on standard fees ($US794 vs $US575) and medication costs ($US564 vs $US109), lower procedure costs ($US0 vs $US122) and physician visit costs ($US200 vs $US330), and greater clinical effectiveness as measured by global improvement rating (86 vs 35%) and Toenail Symptom Index (94 vs 49%). For participants receiving oral medication, 90% of total costs were incurred during the first 4 months of follow-up, whereas for those receiving local therapy, costs were more evenly distributed throughout the study period. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed $US304 to $US491 per additional case improved with oral medication over a 9-month timeframe. Extrapolation of these results using 2 time-points (months 4 and 9) suggested that cost equivalence would be reached 17 to 21 months following the initiation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: During 9 months of follow-up in patients with toenail onychomycosis, the use of oral antifungal medication resulted in superior patient outcomes, but at higher total cost compared with local therapy.     

The economic costs of caring for people with HIV infection and AIDS in England and Wales

The objectives of this study were firstly to estimate total lifetime care costs for an individual with HIV/AIDS, and secondly to estimate the total costs of caring people with HIV infection and AIDS in England and Wales between 1992 and 1997 inclusive. Questionnaires and monthly diaries were used to collate data on healthcare utilisation from patients with HIV infection over a 6-month period. These data were then used to estimate the annual total direct costs of care (stratified by disease stage), total lifetime costs of care, and present and future total national care costs for England and Wales. Costing data were obtained from providers of services throughout Greater London. In total, 235 patients with HIV infection were recruited from 2 clinics in Greater London. All costs were calculated in 1992-93 pounds sterling (pound; 1 pound = $US1.58, December 1995). Annual care costs were estimated at 4515 pounds ($US7134) for a person with asymptomatic HIV disease, 8836 pounds ($US13,961) for a person with symptomatic non-AIDS and 15 268 pounds ($US24,123) for a person with AIDS. Lifetime care costs were estimated at 84,522 pounds ($US133,545) per patient. The total costs of care for England and Wales were forecast to increase from 116,627,400 pounds ($US184,271,300) in 1992 to 162,638,100 pounds ($US256,968,200) in 1997. In conclusion, our study further emphasises the continued shift in hospital services from the inpatient sector to the outpatient sector. The importance of community care and informal care, in terms of the associated direct economic costs, is also highlighted. This emphasises the need for close collaboration between different agencies and strategic coordination of services. Finally, the study forecasts an increase in care costs in England and Wales during the 1990s.     

An economic evaluation of atorvastatin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: The CARDS trial, a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial, found that atorvastatin 10 mg/day for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol significantly reduced cardiovascular (CV) events, including stroke. We estimated the cost effectiveness of atorvastatin as primary prevention against CV disease from the short-term and lifetime US payer perspectives. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We constructed a decision analytic (Markov) model to evaluate long-term costs and outcomes for atorvastatin 10 mg/day versus no HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of a CV event. CV event rates and survival were based on risk equations calibrated to CARDS and applied to a US type 2 diabetes population; the atorvastatin effect on CV events was based on hazard ratios from CARDS; direct medical care costs were based on US treatment patterns and published costs analyses of patients with diabetes. Costs were valued in $US, year 2005 values; costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS: Within the time horizon of the trial (5 years), the cost effectiveness of atorvastatin was $US137 276 per QALY. At 10 years, the incremental cost per QALY improved to $US3640 per QALY. At 25 years, overall costs were lower and QALYs higher in the atorvastatin arm. Costs of managing CV events were lower after 5 years for patients treated with atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with type 2 diabetes and one additional risk factor for CV disease, normal LDL-cholesterol and no history of a CV event, primary prevention with atorvastatin appears to be cost saving and improve outcomes over 25 years, although it is costly from a short-term US payer perspective. From both a medical and an economic viewpoint, primary prevention is desirable in this patient population.     

Healthcare costs of patients with heart failure treated with torasemide or furosemide

OBJECTIVE: To compare the direct healthcare costs of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) prescribed torasemide (torsemide) or furosemide (frusemide). DESIGN AND SETTING: As part of a prospective, randomised, nonblind study, we assessed the effects of torasemide and furosemide on readmission to hospital in 193 patients treated for CHF at a US urban public healthcare system. We also calculated total direct healthcare costs for the 2 drugs. The perspective of the analysis was that of the healthcare system. Healthcare charge and utilisation data, demographic information, and health status data were obtained from an electronic database containing data for all patients treated within the healthcare system. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Upon admission to the hospital, patients were eligible if they had evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, were at least 18 years old, and were receiving furosemide. INTERVENTION: Inpatients were randomised to either torasemide or furosemide treatment for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Patients treated with torasemide had fewer hospital admissions than those treated with furosemide [18 vs 34% for CHF (p = 0.013) and 38 vs 58% for any cardiovascular cause (p = 0.005)]. In the torasemide group, expected annual hospital costs per patient were lower for CHF admissions (by $US1054; 1998 values) and for all cardiovascular admissions (by $US1545) than in the furosemide group. Because the annual acquisition cost of torasemide was $US518 per patient higher than that of furosemide, the resulting net cost saving per patient was $US536 for CHF and $US1027 for all cardiovascular causes. Outpatient costs did not differ between treatment groups regardless of whether drug costs were considered. Total direct costs were $US2124 lower with torasemide than with furosemide (not statistically significant). CONCLUSIONS: Owing largely to reduced readmission to the hospital, the cost of inpatient care for patients with CHF is significantly lower with torasemide than with furosemide, despite the higher acquisition cost of torasemide. Treatment with torasemide resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in total direct costs (outpatient plus inpatient) compared with furosemide.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relative economic consequences of treating asthmatics with twice daily dry powder formoterol 12 micrograms as compared with salmeterol 50 micrograms from a societal perspective. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomised, 6-month, open-label study including 482 patients with asthma was conducted in Italy, Spain, France, Switzerland, the UK and Sweden. Medical costs included the costs of medications, physician services, emergency room visits, hospital admissions and lung function and other tests. Travel costs and costs of production loss were also calculated. Unit prices were estimated from external sources. To pool the costs of the 6 countries, European currencies were converted to US dollars using 1995 exchange rates. Outcome measures were the number of episode-free days (EFDs) and the number of patients reaching a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life as measured using the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment arms in the frequency of emergency room visits, hospital admissions, use of rescue medication or contacts with general practitioners (GPs), specialists or nurses. Median medical costs over 6 months were $US828 per patient with formoterol and $US850 with salmeterol. This difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, about 60% of all days were episode-free. Average costs per EFD were about $US9 for both treatments. The average cost per patient reaching a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life was between $US1300 and $US1400. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were not calculated because both costs and outcomes were not significantly different. Asthma-related absenteeism ranged between 3 days and 6 months per patient in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence to suggest that either treatment was more cost effective than the other.     

The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is widely considered the standard of care for stoke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation who are at high risk of stroke. Community-based studies in the US have reported that the effectiveness of anticoagulation varies by management approach and that patients receiving warfarin have international normalised ratio (INR) values within the target therapeutic range less than half the time. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the lifetime societal costs and health benefits of warfarin therapy to prevent strokes, specifically in elderly patients (mean age 70 years) with atrial fibrillation who are at high risk of stroke, when anticoagulation is managed through usual care versus anticoagulation management services, where dedicated anticoagulation professionals (e.g. physician or pharmacist) monitor and oversee patients. METHODS: Semi-Markov decision model with a 30-day cycle length and 10-year time horizon (to reflect the mean life expectancy of the study population). Univariate sensitivity analyses and Bayesian second-order multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation were performed. Outcomes measures were costs and QALYs. Most of the probability and outcome estimates included were derived from the recent SPORTIF (Stroke Prevention using ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation) V trial. Utility values were derived from a large, nationally representative sample of individuals in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and were adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, education and co-morbidity. Resource utilisation was based on experience at the University Medicine Group Practice Anticoagulation Clinic (University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA) and costs ($US; 2004 values) included were for warfarin and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) use and those associated with major bleeding, treatment of primary events, routine INR and biochemistry monitoring, ECGs, and clinic visits. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3% per annum. RESULTS: The anticoagulation management service improved effectiveness by 0.057 (95% credible interval 0, 0.36) QALYs and reduced costs by $US2100 (95% credible interval -$US19,800, $US300) [2004 values] compared with usual care. Results were sensitive to the extent of the increase in risk of primary events (all strokes and systemic embolic events attributable to usual care, but were robust to variation in other input variables). The anticoagulation management service was the dominant strategy in 91% of Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSION: The anticoagulation management service appears to cost less and provide greater effectiveness than usual care. To enhance stroke prophylaxis among high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation, physicians and Medicare plans may wish to consider augmenting 'usual care' by the addition of patient-monitoring technology strategies such as formally organised anticoagulation monitoring programmes.     

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill patients

The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic outcomes of drug options for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill and/or intensive care unit patients. Decision analytic modelling was used to compare the costs of stress ulcer prophylaxis and possible clinical outcomes [acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGB) and nosocomial pneumonia]. The regimens evaluated were: antacids, histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), sucralfate and no prophylaxis. The results of published studies were pooled to determine the expected probability of AUGB and nosocomial pneumonia following stress ulcer prophylaxis with each of the agents under study. The costs of stress ulcer prophylaxis, treatment of AUGB and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia were identified from various sources. Sucralfate was the least costly agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The average net costs per patient for sucralfate, antacids, no prophylaxis and H2RAs were $US1457, $US1737, $US2268, and $US2638 to $US2712, respectively (1994 dollars). No prophylaxis was found to be less costly than giving H2RAs. Sucralfate and antacids, which induced net savings of $US7373 and $US4321 per case of AUGB averted, respectively, were more cost effective than H2RAs. Sensitivity and threshold analyses revealed that the results were constant over a wide range of cost and probability values. Break-even analysis suggested that sucralfate was the optimal agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis unless the acquisition cost of a prophylactic course of sucralfate was > $US304.05 per patient. At that point, antacids become the optimal agent. Based on this analysis, sucralfate may be the most cost-effective agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill or intensive care patients.     

Evidence-based core clinical pharmacy services in United States hospitals in 2020: services and staffing

We developed a model for the provision of clinical pharmacy services in United States hospitals in 2020. Data were obtained from four National Clinical Pharmacy Services database surveys (1989, 1992, 1995, and 1998) and from the American Health-System Association's 2000 Abridged Guide to the Health Care Field. Staffing data from 1998 indicated that 45,734 pharmacist and 43,836 pharmacy technician full-time equivalent (FTE) staff were employed in U.S. hospitals; 17,325 pharmacist FTEs (38%) were devoted to providing clinical pharmacy services. To provide 14 specific clinical pharmacy services for 100% of U.S. inpatients in 2020, 37,814 new FTEs would be needed. For a more realistic manpower projection, using an evidence-based approach, a set of five core clinical pharmacy services were selected based on favorable associations with major health care outcomes (mortality rate, drug costs, total cost of care, length of hospital stay, and medication errors). The core set of services were drug information, adverse drug reaction management, drug protocol management, medical rounds, and admission drug histories. Implementing these core clinical pharmacy services for 100% of inpatients in 2020 would require 14,508 additional pharmacist FTEs. Based on the current deployment of clinical pharmacists and the services they perform in U.S. hospitals, change is needed to improve health care outcomes and reduce costs. The average U.S. hospital (based on an average daily census of 108.97 +/- 169.45 patients) would need to add a maximum of 3.32 pharmacist FTEs to provide these core clinical services (if they were not provided already by the hospital). Using this evidence-based approach, the five selected core clinical pharmacy services could be provided with only modest increases in clinical pharmacist staffing.     

Organisation of acute stroke care

Information from randomised trials and systematic reviews is used to address issues in the organisation of early stroke care. Specifically, the following areas are discussed: (i) hospital-based care versus home-based care; (ii) organisation of care in hospital; and (iii) discharge and post-discharge care.     

Economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Impact of new treatment options

The incidence, morbidity and mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is rising throughout the world. The total economic cost of COPD in the US in 1993 was estimated to be over $US15.5 billion, with $US6.1 billion for hospitalisation, $US4.4 billion for physician and other fees, $US2.5 billion for drugs, $US1.5 billion for nursing home care and $US1.0 billion for home care. Office visits, hospital outpatient visits and emergency department visits accounted for 17.3% of the direct costs for COPD in the US. When stratified by severity, COPD treatment costs strongly correlate with disease severity. The American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society and the British Thoracic Society have developed guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of COPD. However, the guidelines establish inhaled bronchodilators (anticholinergic agents and beta 2-adrenergic agonists) as the mainstay of therapy for patients with COPD. The guidelines were not based on cost analyses and thus are not a priori cost-effective guidelines. Since the publication of these guidelines, several new pharmacological products have been approved for use in patients with COPD including a combination of an anticholinergic and selective beta 2-adrenergic agonist [ipratropium/salbutamol (albuterol)] and a long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (salmeterol). Both products are effective bronchodilators in COPD. The purpose of this report is to place these new agents in an updated pharmacological guideline scheme, utilising recently published data on clinical efficacy as well as pharmacoeconomics. The annualised healthcare costs were computed to be $US788/patient/year for the combination ipratropium/salbutamol inhaler and $US1059/patient/year for salmeterol (1999 values). Based upon an improved understanding of the complexity of COPD, the response of patients to newer bronchodilators (given individually or in combination), and recent pharmacoeconomic data for COPD treatment, a new treatment algorithm with associated costs is proposed. The use of an algorithm, based on medical and pharmacoeconomic data, will improve lung function in patients with COPD, improve patient satisfaction (e.g. quality of life, dyspnoea) and outcomes (e.g. exacerbations). It will also result in a positive effect on healthcare costs.     

National use of thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine in Denmark: a model of budgetary impact and cost effectiveness

AIM: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the budgetary impact and cost effectiveness of the national use of thrombolysis with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) for acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine in Denmark. METHODS: Computations were based on a Danish health economic model of thrombolysis treatment of acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine. Cost data for stroke units and satellite clinics were taken from the first practical experiences in Denmark with implementing thrombolysis via telemedical linkage to the Stroke Department at Aarhus University Hospital. Effectiveness data were taken from a published pooled analysis of results from randomized controlled trials of alteplase. RESULTS: The calculations showed that the additional total costs to the hospitals of implementing thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine were approximately $US3.0 (range 2.0-5.8) million per year in the case of five centres and five satellite clinics, or $US3.6 (range 2.4-7.0) million per year based on seven centres and seven satellite clinics. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to be approximately $US50,000 when taking a short time perspective (1 year), but thrombolysis was dominant (both cheaper and more effective) after as little as 2 years and cost effectiveness improved over longer time scales. CONCLUSION: The budgetary impact of using thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine depends on the existing capacity and organizational conditions at the local hospitals. The health economic model computations suggest that the macroeconomic costs may balance with savings in care and rehabilitation after as little as 2 years, and that potentially large long-term savings are associated with thrombolysis with alteplase delivered by telemedicine, although the long-term calculations are uncertain.