Androgen modulation of adhesion and antiadhesion molecules in PC-3 prostate cancer cells expressing androgen receptor

The metastatic spread of cancer cells involves a complex process of detachment via antiadhesion molecules and attachment and migration through adhesion. In the prostate, androgens are generally thought to contribute to the development and progression of prostate cancer by promoting cell proliferation and survival through poorly defined mechanisms. We have reported previously that PC-3 prostate cancer cells, which are unresponsive to androgens, show androgen-dependent detachment and ultimately apoptosis when stably transfected with a full-length human androgen receptor (AR) cDNA. We now demonstrate that treatment of these cells with 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) for 24 or 48 h increased the expression of antiadhesion mucin MUC-1 at the cell surface as detected by flow cytometry with two independent antibodies. This increase in protein was concordant with up-regulation of MUC-1 mRNA in the AR-transfected PC-3 sublines, as determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Treatment with DHT for 48 h also down-regulated the cell surface expression of alpha2beta1-integrin but having little effect on the levels of alpha3beta1- and alpha5beta1-integrins. Androgen also decreased, in a dose-dependent manner, the adhesion of AR-transfected PC-3 cells to collagen type I, which was shown to be specifically inhibited by blocking antibody to alpha2beta1-integrin. The present data demonstrate that DHT can modulate expression of adhesion and antiadhesion molecules and suggest that this effect of androgen might contribute to prostate cancer progression.     

Androgen receptor corepressors and prostate cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) mediates the effects of male steroid hormones (androgens) and contributes to a wide variety of physiological and pathophysiological conditions. As such, the regulatory mechanisms governing AR activity are of high significance. Concerted effort has been placed on delineating the mechanisms that control AR activity in prostate cancer, as AR is required for survival and proliferation in this tumor type. Moreover, AR is the central therapeutic target for metastatic prostate cancers, and recurrent tumors evade therapy by restoring AR activity. It is increasingly apparent that AR cofactors which modulate receptor activity can contribute to prostate cancer growth or progression, and this has been particularly well established for AR coactivators. The present review is focused on the role of AR corepressors in governing androgen action, with a specific emphasis on their activities in prostate cancer.     

Androgen receptor is a tumor suppressor and proliferator in prostate cancer

Targeting androgens/androgen receptor (AR) functions via androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the standard treatment for prostate cancer. However, most tumors eventually recur despite ADT. Here we demonstrate that the prostate AR may function as both a suppressor and a proliferator to suppress or promote prostate cancer metastasis. Results from orthotopically recombining stromal WPMY1 cells with epithelial PC3 prostate cancer cells in mice demonstrated that restoring AR in epithelial PC3 cells or knockdown of AR in stromal WPMY1 cells suppressed prostate cancer metastasis. Knockdown of the AR in epithelial CWR22rv1 prostate cancer cells also resulted in increased cell invasion in vitro and in vivo. Restoring AR in PC3 cells (PC3-AR9) results in decreased invasion in bone lesion assays and in vivo mouse models. Mice lacking the prostate epithelial AR have increased apoptosis in epithelial luminal cells and increased proliferation in epithelial basal cells. The consequences of these two contrasting results led to the expansion of CK5/CK8-positive intermediate cells, and mice developed larger and more invasive metastatic tumors in lymph nodes and died earlier than wild-type littermates. Mechanistic dissection suggested that androgens/AR might directly or indirectly modulate metastasis-related genes and suppression of TGFβ1 signals results in the partial inhibition of AR-mediated metastasis. Collectively, our understanding of these opposing roles of prostatic AR may revolutionize the way we combat prostate cancer, and allow the development of new and better therapies by targeting only the proliferative role of AR.     

Inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth by second-site androgen receptor antagonists

The impact of ligand binding on nuclear receptor (NR) structure and the ability of target cells to distinguish between different receptor-ligand complexes are key determinants of the pharmacological activity of NR ligands. However, until relatively recently, these mechanistic insights have not been used in a prospective manner to develop screens for NR modulators with specific therapeutic activities. Driven by the need for unique androgen receptor (AR) antagonists that retain activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, we developed and applied a conformation-based screen to identify AR antagonists that were mechanistically distinct from existing drugs of this class. Two molecules were identified by using this approach, D36 and D80, which interact with AR in a unique manner and allosterically inhibit AR agonist activity. Unlike the clinically important antiandrogens, casodex and hydroxyflutamide, both D36 and D80 block androgen action in cellular models of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Mechanistically, these compounds further distinguish themselves from classical AR antagonists in that they do not promote AR nuclear translocation and quantitatively inhibit the association of AR with DNA even under conditions of overexpression. Although the therapeutic potential of these antiandrogens is apparent, it is the demonstration that it is possible, to modulate the interaction of cofactors with agonist-activated AR, using second-site modulators, that has the greatest potential with respect to the therapeutic exploitation of AR and other NRs.     

雄激素受体对前列腺癌PC3细胞株增殖能力的影响

目的研究雄激素受体（AR）对雄激素非依赖性前列腺癌细胞株PC3增殖能力的影响。方法将含有AR的质粒（Pbabe-AR）稳定转染到PC3细胞,建立起新的细胞系PC3-AR,并用实时逆转录聚合酶链反应（Q—PCR）、蛋白免疫印迹试验（Western blot）和荧光素酶法确认AR的表达水平和功能;用MTT法、软琼脂糖凝胶实验检测AR对体外培养PC3细胞增殖的影响。结果PC3-AR细胞能够稳定表达有功能的AR;MTT实验显示PC3-AR细胞体外生长慢于PC3-v细胞,加入DHT以后效果更加明显。相对于PC3-v,PC3-AR在软琼脂糖凝胶中形成的克隆明显减少。结论AR能够降低PC3-AR细胞在体外的增殖能力。     

The androgen receptor and prostate cancer invasion

Eppin (epididymal protease inhibitor) is a member of the whey acidic protein (WAP)-type four-disulfide core (WFDC) gene family. This study provides updated information on Eppin and the Eppin-like genes within the Eppin cluster on human chromosome 20. A virtual structural model of the Eppin protein demonstrates that the C-terminal half of Eppin is structurally homologous to the Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor. The Eppin N-terminal may have structural similarities to defensin-type molecules, rather than to that of the WAP consensus sequence. Human spermatozoa have a receptor for Eppin. When recombinant semenogelin (Sg) is digested with PSA many low molecular weight fragments are produced. However, when Eppin is bound to Sg, digestion by PSA is modulated. Addition of antibodies to the C-terminal of Eppin resulted in blocking PSA activity modulation. We can hypothesize from our analysis of anti-Eppin epitopes on Eppin that when anti-Eppin antibodies are bound to Eppin on the sperm surface they block the binding site for semenogelin.     

Androgen receptor mutations and androgen insensitivity

The androgen receptor (AR) is a high affinity receptor protein encoded on the human X-chromosome that mediates the actions of androgens during development and in the adult. Defects in this receptor protein result in a wide range of abnormalities of male sexual development. Studies in a number of different laboratories have identified mutations of the AR gene in subjects with androgen resistance syndromes. Defects that interrupt the AR open-reading frame have been traced to a number of distinct types of genetic alterations, have been identified in widely separated segments of the AR gene, and are invariably associated with the phenotype of complete androgen insensitivity. By contrast, mutations that cause single amino acid substitutions within the AR are localized to the DNA- or ligand-binding domains of the receptor protein and have been associated with the full range of androgen resistant phenotypes. The diversity of mutations that have been identified has prompted a consideration of the relationship between AR mutation and phenotype. Analyses of AR abundance and function suggest that the phenotypic abnormalities that result from mutation of the AR reflect the extent to which AR activity is impaired in target tissues. Such decreases in AR function may be the result of the diminished receptor function, decreases in receptor concentration, or a combination of these two effects.     

Altered endocytosis of epidermal growth factor receptor in androgen receptor positive prostate cancer cell lines

Although androgens and the androgen receptor (AR) are involved in tumorigenesis of prostate cancer (PC) in initial phases, less clear is the role played in advanced androgen-independent (AI) stages of the disease. Several recent reports indicated that re-expression of AR in PC-derived cell lines determines a less aggressive phenotype of the cells. We have previously demonstrated that re-expression of AR decreases the invasion ability of PC3 cells in vitro by affecting signalling and internalization processes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Here, we show that reduced EGFR internalization is also a characteristic of AR positive PC cell lines LNCaP and 22Rv1. Reduced internalization in PC3-AR cells is associated to a defective interaction between the EGFR and two adaptor proteins which mediate the endocytotic process, Grb2 and c-Cbl. As a consequence of such reduced interaction, ubiquitination of the receptor, which is mainly mediated by c-Cbl, is also altered. In addition, we show that internalized EGFR co-localizes with early endosome antigen-1, a marker of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, in PC3-Neo cells but not in AR positive cell lines. Conversely, EGFR maintains co-localization with caveolin-1 after EGF stimulation in PC3-AR cells. These data suggest that expression of AR affects clathrin-mediated endocytosis pathway of EGFR, which, according to recent findings, plays an essential role in the completeness of signalling of the receptor. Taken together, these data emphasize the role of AR in the regulation of EGFR endocytotic trafficking and active signalling in PC cells. In view of the role of EGFR signalling in invasion of carcinoma cells, our data may explain the lower invasive phenotype observed in AR-positive cell lines.     

Androgen receptor gene mutations in human prostate cancer.

We screened human prostate cancer tissues for the presence of somatic mutations in the hormone binding domain of the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Exons E-H were amplified from genomic DNA using the polymerase chain reaction and analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), which separates DNA fragments that differ by only a single base. We detected a mutation in exon E of the hormone binding domain in 1 of 26 specimens of untreated organ-confined stage B prostate cancer. The mutation was not detectable in peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA. Lymphocyte DNA (wild-type AR) migrated in DGGE as a single band. The tumor DNA migrated in DGGE as four bands, consistent with the presence of cells with mutant AR plus cells with wild-type AR and indicating that the tumor contained a somatic mutation. To our knowledge, a somatic AR gene mutation has not been reported previously. Sequencing revealed a G----A substitution in codon 730, changing valine to methionine. Codon 730 is in a region highly conserved among all steroid receptors. The abundance of the mutated fragment (about 50% of the DNA in the specimen) indicates its presence in cells with a growth advantage. A somatic mutation could be detected by DGGE if it represented at least 10% of the sample. Failure to detect mutations in other specimens analyzed may be due to this limit of sensitivity, the presence of mutations in other parts of the AR, or a low frequency of mutations in early stage disease.     

Androgen sensitivity related proteins in hormone-sensitive and hormone-insensitive prostate cancer cell lines treated by androgen antagonist bicalutamide

Members of the bcl-2 gene family and endogenous inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases participate in the regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle in a diverse range of cell types and are implicated in the development of hormone refractory prostate cancer and resistance to anti-cancer therapy. The expression of several of these genes can be regulated by steroid hormones and related agents via their nuclear receptors. However, insufficient information considering the protein expression after the treatment by hormone antagonists is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins, (Bcl-2, Bax), and to correlate this with the appearance of some nuclear receptors and cell cycle related proteins in androgen sensitive and androgen insensitive prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP and DU-145, after the treatment by androgen antagonist bicalutamide. Our results revealed that androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP cells decreased, however in DU-145 cells AR slightly increased following anti-androgen treatment. The same agent stimulated expression of p21Waf1/Cip5 and p27Kip1 in LNCaP, as well as in DU-145 cell lines. Bcl-2 level increased slightly in LNCaP cells and, in DU-145 cells was almost undetectable. Bax expression was not changed in LNCaP but significantly decreased in DU-145 cells. Similarly, retinoid X receptor beta (RXRbeta) level was significantly down regulated after 24 hours in DU-145 and also in LNCaP cells after 72 hours. These results confirm that androgen withdrawal therapy employing anti-androgens may elicit different signalling pathways in various types of prostate cancer that may be dependent on AR status and AR sensitivity.     

Expression of GnRH type II is regulated by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer

GnRH II has important functional effects in steroid hormone-dependent tumours. Here we investigated the expression and regulation of GnRH II in prostate cancer. GnRH II protein was equally expressed in benign (73%) and malignant (78%) biopsies studied in a prostate tissue microarray (P = 0.779). There was no relationship between expression and clinical parameters in the cancer cohort. GnRH II was, however, significantly reduced in tumour biopsies following hormone ablation. This was further investigated in a prostate xenograft model where androgens increased GnRH II levels, while their withdrawal reduced it. In cell lines, we confirmed high levels of GnRH II in androgen receptor (AR)-positive LNCaP cells but low levels in AR-negative PC3 cells. In LNCaP cells, GnRH II induction by androgens was blocked by the AR inhibitor casodex, but not by cycloheximide treatment. Sequence analysis subsequently revealed a putative androgen response element in the upstream region of the GnRH II gene and direct interaction with the AR was confirmed in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Finally, to test whether the effects of GnRH II were dependent on AR expression, LNCaP and PC3 cells were exposed to exogenous peptide. In both cell lines, GnRH II inhibited cell proliferation and migration, suggesting that its function is independent of AR status. These results provide evidence that GnRH II is widely expressed in prostate cancer and is an AR-regulated gene. Further studies are warranted to characterise the effects of GnRH II on prostate cancer cells and investigate its potential value as a novel therapy.     

Androgen receptor decoy molecules block the growth of prostate cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is activated by both ligand-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Current therapies for prostate cancer target the ligand-binding domain in the C terminus of the AR. However, ligand-independent activation of the AR occurs by the N-terminal domain (NTD), making the NTD a potential novel target for the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer. A possible therapeutic approach is to overexpress an AR NTD peptide to create decoy molecules that competitively bind the interacting proteins required for activation of the endogenous full-length AR. We provide evidence that in vivo expression of AR NTD decoys decreased tumor incidence and inhibited the growth of prostate cancer tumors. This growth inhibition was characterized by a 10-fold decrease in serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (46.7 ng/ml+/-19.9 vs. 432.4 ng/ml+/-201.3; P=0.0299) and a 4-fold decrease in tumor volume (92.2 mm3+/-43.4 vs. 331.4 mm3+/-85.5; P=0.011). AR NTD decoy molecules also delayed hormonal progression, as determined by time to rising PSA levels after castration of the host. The tumors treated with AR NTD decoys contained more apoptotic cells and fewer proliferating cells, whereas no effect was seen on the viability of cells that did not depend on the AR. This work provides further evidence of the importance of the NTD of the AR in the progression of prostate cancer and presents a target for the development of antagonists of the AR in the clinical management of this disease.     

Androgen receptor (AR) aberrations in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Genetic aberrations affecting the androgen receptor (AR) are rare in untreated prostate cancers (PCs) but have been found in castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs). Further, successful treatment with novel endocrine therapies indicates that CRPCs remain androgen-sensitive. Known AR aberrations include amplification of the AR gene leading to the overexpression of the receptor, point mutations of AR resulting in promiscuous ligand usage, and constitutively active AR splice variants. Gain, or amplification, of the AR gene is one of the most frequent genetic alterations observed in CRPCs. Up to 80% of CRPCs have been reported to carry an elevated AR gene copy number, and about 30% have a high-level amplification of the gene. AR mutations are also commonly observed and have been found in approximately 10-30% of the CRPC treated with antiandrogens; however, the frequency and significance of AR splice variants is still unclear. Because AR aberrations are found almost exclusively in CRPC, these alterations must have been selected for during therapy. Interestingly, these aberrations lead to activation of the receptor, despite treatment-induced emergence of therapy-resistant tumor clones. Therefore, future novel treatment strategies should focus on suppressing AR activity in CRPC.     

Androgen receptor in prostate cancer: cause or cure?

Growth of prostate tumours is dependent on androgens. Hence, therapy involves removing androgens and opposing their effects using antiandrogens. This is initially successful but inevitably fails and tumours recur. The cause of this transition to hormone-independence, and the precise role of the androgen receptor in this, is a matter of considerable debate. A recent study used a mouse model to assess the effects of increased androgen receptor expression in the prostate and found that, whereas increased expression of wild-type receptor had no effect, a mutation of the androgen receptor caused it to have oncogenic properties. This goes some way to elucidating how the androgen receptor affects tumour growth, and provides an exciting model for further study of androgen receptor mutations in prostate cancer.