Peripheral venous pressure is an alternative to central venous pressure in paediatric surgery patients

BACKGROUND: Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) is easily and safely measured. In adults, PVP correlates closely with central venous pressure (CVP) during major non-cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement between CVP and PVP in children during major surgery and during recovery. METHODS: Fifty patients aged 3-9 years, scheduled for major elective surgery, each underwent simultaneous measurements of CVP and PVP at random points during controlled ventilation intraoperatively (six readings) and during spontaneous ventilation in the post-anaesthesia care unit (three readings). In a subset of four patients, measurements were taken during periods of hypotension and subsequent fluid resuscitation (15 readings from each patient). RESULTS: Peripheral venous pressure was closely correlated to CVP intraoperatively, during controlled ventilation (r=0.93), with a bias of 1.92 (0.47) mmHg (95% confidence interval = 2.16-1.68). In the post-anaesthesia care unit, during spontaneous ventilation, PVP correlated strongly with CVP (r = 0.89), with a bias of 2.45 (0.57) mmHg (95% confidence interval = 2.73-2.17). During periods of intraoperative hypotension and fluid resuscitation, within-patient changes in PVP mirrored changes in CVP (r = 0.92). CONCLUSION: In children undergoing major surgery, PVP showed good agreement with CVP in the perioperative period. As changes in PVP parallel, in direction, changes in CVP, PVP monitoring may offer an alternative to direct CVP measurement for perioperative estimation of volume status and guiding fluid therapy.     

Correlation of peripheral venous pressure and central venous pressure in surgical patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of agreement between central venous pressure (CVP) and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) in surgical patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients without cardiac dysfunction undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery (n = 150). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Simultaneous CVP and PVP measurements were obtained at random points in mechanically ventilated patients during surgery (n = 100) and in spontaneously ventilating patients in the postanesthesia care unit (n = 50). In a subset of 10 intraoperative patients, measurements were made before and after a 2-L fluid challenge. During surgery, PVP correlated highly to CVP (r = 0.86), and the bias (mean difference between CVP and PVP) was -1.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg (mean +/- SD). In the postanesthesia care unit, PVP also correlated highly to CVP (r = 0.88), and the bias was -2.2 +/- 1.9 (mean +/- SD). When adjusted by the average bias of -2, PVP predicted the observed CVP to within +/-3 mmHg in both populations of patients with 95% probability. In patients receiving a fluid challenge, PVP and CVP increased similarly from 6 +/- 2 to 11 +/- 2 mmHg and 4 +/- 2 to 9 +/- 2 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, PVP showed a consistent and high degree of agreement with CVP in the perioperative period in patients without significant cardiac dysfunction. PVP -2 was useful in predicting CVP over common clinical ranges of CVP. PVP is a rapid noninvasive tool to estimate volume status in surgical patients.     

Peripheral venous pressure predicts central venous pressure poorly in pediatric patients

Purpose: Using peripheral venous pressure (PVP) instead of central venous pressure (CVP) as a volume monitor decreases patient risks and costs, and is convenient. This study was undertaken to determine if PVP predicts CVP in pediatric patients. METHODS: With ethical approval and informed consent, 30 pediatric patients aged neonate to 12 yr requiring a central venous line were studied prospectively in a tertiary care teaching hospital. In the supine position, PVP and CVP were simultaneously transduced. Ninety-six paired recordings of CVP and PVP were made. Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis of agreement of end-expiratory measurements were performed. RESULTS: The mean (SD; range) CVP was 10.0 mmHg (6.0; -1.0 to 27.0); the mean PVP was 13.7 mmHg (6.3; 0.0 to 33.0); offset (bias) of PVP > CVP was 3.7 mmHg with SD 2.6. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the bias were 3.2 to 4.1 mmHg. In the Bland-Altman analysis, lower and upper limits of agreement (LOA; CI in parentheses) were -1.5 (-2.3 to -0.7) and 8.8 (8.1 to 9.6) mmHg. Eight of 96 points were outside the limits of agreement. The correlation of PVP on CVP was r = 0.92, P < 0.0001. For a subset of ten patients (20 simultaneous recordings) with iv catheters proximal to the hand, limits of agreement were better - offset: 3.8 mmHg (+/- 1.4); lower LOA: 1.2 mmHg (0.25 to 2.1); upper LOA: 6.6 mmHg (5.7 to 7.5). CONCLUSION: Peripheral venous pressure measured from an iv catheter in the hand predicts CVP poorly in pediatric patients.     

Can peripheral venous pressure be an alternative to central venous pressure during right hepatectomy in living donors?

The safety of living donors is a matter of cardinal importance in addition to obtaining optimal liver grafts to be transplanted. Central venous pressure (CVP) is known to have significant correlation with the amount of bleeding during parenchymal transection and many centers have adopted CVP monitoring for right hepatectomy. However, central line cannulation can induce some serious complications. Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) has been suggested as a comparable alternative to CVP. The aim of this study was to determine whether a clinically acceptable agreement or a reliable correlation between CVP and PVP exist and if CVP can be replaced by PVP in living liver donors. A central venous catheter was placed through the right internal jugular vein and a peripheral venous catheter was inserted at antecubital fossa in the right arm. CVP and PVP were recorded in 15-minute intervals in 50 adult living donors. The paired data were divided into 3 stages: preparenchymal transection, parenchymal transection, and postparenchymal transection. A total of 1,430 simultaneous measurements of CVP and PVP were recorded. Overall, the PVP, CVP, and bias were 7.0+/-2.46, 5.9+/-2.32, and 1.16+/-1.12 mmHg, respectively. A total of 88.9% of all measurements were clinically within acceptable limits of bias (+/-2 mmHg). Regression analysis showed a high correlation coefficient between PVP and CVP (r=0.893; P<0.001) and the limits of agreement were -1.03 to 3.34 overall. In conclusion, frequencies of differences, bias, correlation coefficient, and limits of agreement between PVP and CVP remained relatively constant throughout the operation. Therefore, PVP measurement in the arm can be an alternative to predict CVP and further, obviate central venous catheter-related complications in living liver donors.     

Comparison of peripheral and central venous pressures in critically Ill patients

We conducted a prospective study to determine the relationship between central (CVP) and peripheral (PVP) venous pressures in critically ill patients. CVP and PVP were measured on five different occasions in 20 critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Results showed that the mean difference between PVP and CVP was 4.4 mmHg (95% CI = 3.7 to 5.0). However, PVP might be 1.9 mmHg below (95% CI = 0.7 to 3.1) or 10.6 mmHg above (95% CI = 9.4 to 11.8) the CVP. The mean difference between changes in PVP and corresponding changes in CVP was 0.3 mmHg (95% CI = -0.1 to 0.7). The actual change in PVP could be 3.0 mmHg below (95% CI = 2.3 to 3.7) or 3.6 mmHg above (95% CI = 2.9 to 4.3) the change in CVP. Overall, the direction of change in PVP (rise or drop) predicted a same direction of change in CVP with an accuracy of 78%. Changes in PVP > or = 2 mmHg predicted a change in same direction of CVP with an accuracy of 90%. The direction of changes in CVP > or = 2 mmHg were predicted by the direction of change in PVP with an accuracy of 91%. We conclude that PVP measurement does not give an accurate estimate of the absolute value of CVP in individual patients. However, as changes in PVP parallel, in direction, changes in CVP, serial measurements of PVP may have a value in determining volume status and guiding fluid therapy in critically ill patients.     

Peripheral venous pressure as a predictor of central venous pressure during orthotopic liver transplantation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of peripheral venous pressure (PVP) as a predictor of central venous pressure (CVP) in the setting of rapidly fluctuating hemodynamics during orthotopic liver transplant surgery. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. SETTING: UCLA Medical Center, main operating room-liver transplant surgery. PATIENTS: Nine adult patients with liver failure undergoing orthotopic liver transplant surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A pulmonary artery catheter and a 20-g antecubital peripheral intravenous catheter dedicated to measuring PVP were placed in all patients after standard general endotracheal anesthesia induction and institution of mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS: Peripheral venous pressure and CVP were recorded every 5 minutes and/or during predetermined, well-defined surgical events (skin incision, venovenous bypass initiation, portal vein anastamosis, 5 minute post graft reperfusion, abdominal closure). Pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output (via thermodilution) were recorded every 15 and 30 minutes, respectively. MAIN RESULTS: Peripheral venous pressure (mean +/- SD) was 11.0 +/- 4.5 mmHg vs a CVP of 9.5 +/- 5.0; the two measurements differed by an average of 1.5 +/- 1.6 mmHg. Peripheral venous pressure correlated highly with CVP in every patient, and the overall correlation among all nine patients calculated using a random-effects regression model was r = 0.95 (P < 0.0001). A Bland-Altman analysis used to determine the accuracy of PVP in comparison to CVP yielded a bias of -1.5 mmHg and a precision of +/-3.1 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that PVP correlates with CVP even under adverse hemodynamic conditions in patients undergoing liver transplantation.     

Effect of catheter site on the agreement of peripheral and central venous pressure measurements in neurosurgical patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggest a correlation of central venous pressure (CVP) with peripheral venous pressure (PVP) in different clinical setups. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of measurement site on PVP and its agreement with CVP in patients undergoing general anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTINGS: University hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II undergoing elective craniotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned into Group A (antecubital; n=15) and Group D (dorsum hand; n=15) for antecubital and hand dorsum catheterization sites, respectively. Central venous pressure and PVP were monitored throughout the study. A total of 1925 simultaneous measurements were recorded at 5-minute intervals. Bland-Altman assessment for agreement was used for CVP and PVP in 2 groups. MEASUREMENTS: Peripheral venous pressure measurements were within the range of +/-2 mm Hg of CVP values, in 93.9% of the measurements in Group A, and in 91.2% of the measurements in Group D. Considering all measurements, mean bias was -0.072 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.134 to -0.010). Group A measurements showed a bias (CVP-PVP) of 0.173+/-3.557 mm Hg, whereas the bias was -0.122+/-4.322 mm Hg (mean+/-SDcorrected for repeated measurements) in Group D. All of the measurements were within mean+/-2SD of bias, which means that PVP and CVP are interchangeable in our clinical setting. CONCLUSION: Peripheral venous pressure measurement may be a noninvasive alternative for estimating CVP in patients undergoing elective neurosurgical operations. Measuring PVP from hand dorsum does not interfere with the agreement of CVP and PVP.     

Association between central venous pressure and blood loss during hepatic resection in 984 living donors

Background: Although low central venous pressure (CVP) anesthesia has been used to minimize blood loss during hepatectomy, the efficacy of this technique remains controversial. We therefore assessed the association between blood loss and CVP during hepatic resection, and examined significant determinants associated with intraoperative hemorrhage during hepatectomy in living donors.
Methods: Between April 2004 and April 2008, 984 living donors who underwent a hepatic resection were assessed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the relationships between intraoperative blood loss and several variables including CVP.
Results: The mean intraoperative blood loss was 691.3 ± 365.5 ml. Only four donors required packed red blood cell transfusions (mean, 1.5 U). The mean duration of hepatic resection was 92.1 ± 26.3 min. The mean, maximum, and minimum values of CVP measured during hepatectomy were 4.6 ± 1.7, 5.3 ± 1.8, and 4.0 ± 1.8 mmHg, respectively, and were not significantly correlated with intraoperative blood loss. On multivariate analysis, predictors of hemorrhage were liver fatty change, gender, and body weight, but none of the mean CVP, surgeons, anesthesiologists, anesthesia duration, resected liver volume, hepatectomy type, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or body temperature were significant.
Conclusions: CVP during hepatic resection was not associated with intraoperative blood loss in living liver donors, suggesting that CVP may not be an important factor in predicting blood loss during hepatectomy in healthy subjects.     

Recipient Hemodynamics During Non-Heart-Beating Donor Kidney Transplantation Are Major Predictors of Primary Nonfunction

Non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) kidneys may substantially expand the donor pool, but many transplant centers are reluctant to use these kidneys because of the relatively high incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF). In heart-beating donor kidneys, intravascular fluid depletion during transplant surgery is associated with delayed graft function (DGF). Therefore, we studied the effect of the recipients' hemodynamic status on the outcome of 177 NHBD kidney transplantations. Independent statistically significant predictors of PNF were average central venous pressure (CVP) below 6 cmH(2)O (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.1 (95% CI: 1.4-7.1), p=0.007), average systolic blood pressure below 110 mmHg (AOR 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.9), p=0.03) and pre-operative diastolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg (AOR 2.4 (95% CI: 1.0-5.9), p=0.05). Donor characteristics were not independently associated with PNF (p>0.10). In a subgroup analysis of 56 paired kidneys, 29% of the recipients with the lower CVP of the pair experienced PNF compared with 11% of their counterparts with higher CVP (p=0.09). Our study indicates that recipient hemodynamics during transplant surgery are major predictors of PNF. Therefore, improving recipient hemodynamics by expansion of the intravascular volume is expected to enhance the results of NHBD kidney transplantations and may enlarge the donor pool by increasing the acceptance of NHBD kidneys.     

Effect of body temperature on peripheral venous pressure measurements and its agreement with central venous pressure in neurosurgical patients

Previous studies suggest a correlation of central venous pressure (CVP) with peripheral venous pressure (PVP) in different clinical settings. The effect of body temperature on PVP and its agreement with CVP in patients under general anesthesia are investigated in this study. Fifteen American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients undergoing elective craniotomy were included in the study. CVP, PVP, and core (Tc) and peripheral (Tp) temperatures were monitored throughout the study. A total of 950 simultaneous measurements of CVP, PVP, Tc, and Tp from 15 subjects were recorded at 5-minute intervals. The measurements were divided into low- and high-Tc and -Tp groups by medians as cutoff points. Bland-Altman assessment for agreement was used for CVP and PVP in all groups. PVP measurements were within range of +/-2 mm Hg of CVP values in 94% of the measurements. Considering all measurements, mean bias was 0.064 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -0.018-0.146). Corrected bias for repeated measurements was 0.173 +/- 3.567 mm Hg (mean +/- SD(corrected)). All of the measurements were within mean +/- 2 SD of bias, which means that PVP and CVP are interchangeable in our setting. As all the measurements were within 1 SD of bias when Tc was > or = 35.8 degrees C, even a better agreement of PVP and CVP was evident. The effect of peripheral hypothermia was not as prominent as core hypothermia. PVP measurement may be a noninvasive alternative for estimating CVP. Body temperature affects the agreement of CVP and PVP, which deteriorates at lower temperatures.     

腹腔镜肝切除术中肝下下腔静脉部分阻断对中心静脉压和出血量影响研究

目的 评估肝下下腔静脉部分阻断在腹腔镜肝切除术中的有效性和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2015年9月至2020年8月中国科学院大学重庆医院肝胆外科收治的行腹腔镜肝切除术的132例病人的临床资料。根据术中是否行肝下下腔静脉阻断分为阻断组（68例）和非阻断组（64例）,分析术中出血量、中心静脉压、断肝时间、断肝面积等指标。结果 所有病人均能耐受肝下下腔静脉部分阻断;与非阻断组比,肝下下腔静脉阻断后无血流动力学不稳定且中心静脉压明显下降,差异有统计学意义［（4.4±1.6）cmH2O vs. （1.9±1.2）cmH2O,P＜0.05］。在出血量方面,阻断组总出血量和断肝出血量与非阻断组差异无统计学意义［（289.3±113.5）mL vs. （302.4±124.6）mL,（241.2±107.9）mL vs. （277.3±114.5）mL,P均＞0.05］;但在合并中重度肝硬化病人的亚组中,相较于非阻断组,阻断组中总失血量和断肝失血量明显减少,差异有统计学意义［（342.7±70.2）mL vs. （468.2±87.8）mL,（328.7±68.9）mL vs. （427.9±93.2）mL,P均＜0.05］。两组手术时间、断肝手术时间、肝断面面积、术中液体输注量以及术后肝肾功能比较差异均无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。结论 腹腔镜肝切除术中行肝下下腔静脉阻断可减少中重度肝硬化病人术中出血量,且对肝肾功能无明显影响,安全有效。     

Stroke volume of the heart and thoracic fluid content during head-up and head-down tilt in humans

BACKGROUND: The stroke volume (SV) of the heart depends on the diastolic volume but, for the intact organism, central pressures are applied widely to express the filling of the heart. METHODS: This study evaluates the interdependence of SV and thoracic electrical admittance of thoracic fluid content (TA) vs. the central venous (CVP), mean pulmonary artery (MPAP) and pulmonary artery wedge (PAWP) pressures during head-up (HUT) and head-down (HDT) tilt in nine healthy humans. RESULTS: From the supine position to 20 degrees HDT, SV [112 +/- 18 ml; mean +/- standard deviation (SD)], TA (30.8 +/- 7.1 mS) and CVP (3.6 +/- 0.9 mmHg) did not change significantly, whereas MPAP (from 13.9 +/- 2.7 to 16.1 +/- 2.5 mmHg) and PAWP (from 8.8 +/- 3.4 to 11.3 +/- 2.5 mmHg; P < 0.05) increased. Conversely, during 70 degrees HUT, SV (to 65 +/- 24 ml) decreased, together with CVP (to 0.9 +/- 1.4 mmHg; P < 0.001), MPAP (to 9.3 +/- 3.8 mmHg; P < 0.01), PAWP (to 0.7 +/- 3.3 mmHg; P < 0.001) and TA (to 26.7 +/- 6.8 mS; P < 0.01). However, from 20 to 50 min of HUT, SV decreased further (to 48 +/- 21 ml; P < 0.001), whereas the central pressures did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: During both HUT and HDT, SV of the heart changed with the thoracic fluid content rather than with the central vascular pressures. These findings confirm that the function of the heart relates to its volume rather than to its so-called filling pressures.     

Iliac venous pressure estimates central venous pressure after laparotomy

Background

Central venous pressure (CVP) is traditionally obtained through subclavian or internal jugular central catheters; however, many patients who could benefit from CVP monitoring have only femoral lines. The accuracy of illiac venous pressure (IVP) as a measure of CVP is unknown, particularly following laparotomy.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study. Patients who had both internal jugular or subclavian lines and femoral lines already in place were eligible for the study. Pressure measurements were taken from both lines in addition to measurement of bladder pressure, mean arterial pressure, and peak airway pressure. Data were evaluated using paired t-test, Bland-Altman analysis, and linear regression.

Results

Measurements were obtained from 40 patients, 26 of which had laparotomy. The mean difference between measurements was 2.2 mm Hg. There were no significant differences between patients who had laparotomy and nonsurgical patients (P = 0.93). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 1.63 ± 2.44 mm Hg. There was no correlation between IVP accuracy and bladder pressure, mean arterial pressure, or peak airway pressure.

Conclusions

IVP is an adequate measure of CVP, even in surgical patients who have had recent laparotomy. Measurement of IVP to guide resuscitation is encouraged in patients who have only femoral venous catheter access.     

STARR with Contour® Transtar™: prospective multicentre European study

Objective  The stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with defecation disorders is limited by the shape and capacity of the circular stapler. A new device has been recently developed, the Contour^® Transtar^™ stapler, in order to improve the safety and effectiveness of the STARR technique. The study has been designed to confirm this declaration.
Method  From January to June 2007 a prospective European multicentre study of consecutive patients with defecation disorder caused by internal rectal prolapse underwent the new STARR technique. The assessment of perioperative morbidity and functional outcome after 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months was documented by different scores.
Results  In all 75 patients, median age 64, the Transtar procedure was performed with 9% intraoperative difficulties, 7% postoperative complications and no mortality. The mean reduction of the ODS score was −15.6 (95%−CI: −17.3 to −13.8, P  < 0.0001), mean reduction of SSS was −12.6 (95%−CI: −14.2 to −11.2; P  < 0.0001). 41% stated improvement of their continence status by CCF score, only 4 patients (5%) had deterioration.
Conclusion  The Transtar procedure is technically demanding, with good functional results similar to the conventional STARR.     

Anatomic relationship between the internal jugular vein and the carotid artery in preschool children--an ultrasonographic study

Background:  Central venous cannulation in young children is technically difficult and may lead to potentially serious complications especially when performed blindly or using anatomical landmarks only.
Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the anatomical relationship of the internal jugular vein (IJV) and the common carotid artery (CA) in preschool children using ultrasound.
Methods:  Forty five children aged 60 months and under were included prospectively and divided into three groups: group 1: <6 months, group 2: 7–18 months and group 3: 19–60 months. With the head in neutral position the location of the left and right IJV was noted as anterior (A), anterolateral (AL), lateral (L) or medial (M) in relation to the CA at the level of the cricoid cartilage. Depths of IJV and CA as well as time taken to locate the vessels were recorded.
Results:  The IJV was more commonly found in the AL position in all groups. The mean depth was 0.96 cm in group 1, 0.95 cm in group 2 and 3. Mean duration for localization of the vessels was 4.2 s in group 1, 4 s in group 2 and 4.3 s in group 3. The differences between the groups were not significant.
Conclusion:  This study demonstrates that the IJV cover the CA in the majority of young children. Depth of the IJV is rarely more than 1 cm deep to the skin. Ultrasound location of the IJV and CA is easy and does not necessarily delay the procedure. The findings of this study support the use of ultrasound guidance for CVC in children.     

Bronchoscopic suctioning may cause lung collapse: a lung model and clinical evaluation

Objective: To assess lung volume changes during and after bronchoscopic suctioning during volume or pressure-controlled ventilation (VCV or PCV).
Design: Bench test and patient study.
Participants: Ventilator-treated acute lung injury (ALI) patients.
Setting: University research laboratory and general adult intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Interventions: Bronchoscopic suctioning with a 12 or 16 Fr bronchoscope during VCV or PCV.
Measurements and results: Suction flow at vacuum levels of −20 to −80 kPa was measured with a Timeter^™ instrument. In a water-filled lung model, airway pressure, functional residual capacity (FRC) and tidal volume were measured during bronchoscopic suctioning. In 13 ICU patients, a 16 Fr bronchoscope was inserted into the left or the right main bronchus during VCV or PCV and suctioning was performed. Ventilation was monitored with electric impedance tomography (EIT) and FRC with a modified N₂ washout/in technique. Airway pressure was measured via a pressure line in the endotracheal tube. Suction flow through the 16 Fr bronchoscope was 5 l/min at a vacuum level of −20 kPa and 17 l/min at −80 kPa. Derecruitment was pronounced during suctioning and FRC decreased with −479±472 ml, P <0.001.
Conclusions: Suction flow through the bronchoscope at the vacuum levels commonly used is well above minute ventilation in most ALI patients. The ventilator was unable to deliver enough volume in either VCV or PCV to maintain FRC and tracheal pressure decreased below atmospheric pressure.     

Non-Insertion-Related Complications of Central Venous Catheterization—Temporary Vascular Access for Hemodialysis

The authors analyzed 309 central venous catheters (CVC) inserted in 147 hemodialysis patients before the maturation of the first or new arteriovenous fistula. One clinical manifestations of sepsis after CVC insertion was found. In all, 33.7% of the catheters were removed because of early minor complications: CVC occlusion, inadequate blood flow in CVC, shattered suture and malposition of CVC, fever, signs of infection at the site of CVC insertion, and bleeding at the site of CVC insertion. The most frequently isolated pathogenic bacteria at the tips of the catheters were coagulase-negative staphylococci highly sensitive to vancomycin and gentamicin.     

Accuracy and reliability of continuous blood glucose monitor in post-surgical patients

Background: The STG-22^™ is the only continuous blood glucose monitoring system currently available. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy and reliability of the STG-22^™ for continuously monitoring blood glucose level in post-surgical patients.
Methods: Fifty patients scheduled for routine surgery were studied in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. After admission to the ICU, the STG-22^™ was connected to the patients. An attending physician obtained blood samples from a radial arterial catheter. Blood glucose level was measured using the ABL^™800FLEX immediately after blood collection at 0, 4, 8, and 16 h post-admission to the ICU (total of 200 blood glucose values).
Results: The correlation coefficient ( R ²) was 0.96. In the Clarke error grid, 100% of the paired measurements were in the clinically acceptable zone A and B. The Bland and Altman analysis showed that bias±limits of agreement (percent error) were 0.04(0.7)±0.35(6.3) mmol (mg/dl) (7%), −0.11(−2)±1.22(22) (15%) and −0.33(−6)±1.28(23) (10%) in hypoglycemia (<70(3.89) mmol (mg/dl), normoglycemia (3.89(70)–10(180) mmol (mg/dl), and hyperglycemia (>10(180) mmol (mg/dl), respectively.
Conclusions: The STG-22^™ can be used for measuring blood glucose level continuously and measurement results are consistent with intermittent measurement (percentage error within 15%). Therefore, the STG-22^™ is a useful device for monitoring in blood glucose level in the ICU for 16 h.     

Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia: prospective study in a Moroccan medical intensive care unit

Objective

To determine the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) in a Moroccan medical intensive care unit, the microbiological profile of this infection and risk factors associated with its occurrence.

Study design

Prospective observational study.

Methods

Over a period of 8 months, patients who required central venous catheter (CVC) placement for a duration greater than 48 h were included in the study. The CRB has been defined by the criteria of the SRLF Consensus Conference. The proportions of colonization and CRB were expressed as incidence density (ID). Risk factors for colonization were studied in univariate analysis.

Results

One hundred and two CVC were inserted in 70 patients. The average age was 54 ± 20 years with an APACHE II of 28 ± 10. The ID of colonization and CRB were respectively 34 for 1000 days of CVC use and 8 for 1000 days of CVC use. The isolated microorganisms were Gram-negative bacilli in 73 %, Gram-positive cocci in 22 % and finally yeast in 5 %. A prolonged duration of catheterization and the absence of systemic antibiotic therapy before catheterization were the main risk factors for colonization.

Conclusion

The incidence of CRB was high. These results impose a reflection of the care team to improve protocols for prevention of such nosocomial infections.     

Routine X‐ray control of upper central venous lines: Is it necessary?

BACKGROUND: Insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) is a procedure associated with a varying risk of complications, depending on the setting and the skill of the clinician who undertakes the procedure. The aim of this study was to monitor the complication rate of CVC insertion and evaluate the value of routine chest X-ray control. METHODS: Anesthesiologists at eight hospitals filled in a questionnaire immediately after insertion of a CVC. The post-procedural clinical evaluation, including expected complications, was compared to actual radiological findings. Chest X-ray was ordered by the anesthesiologist, and described by staff radiologists. RESULTS: The clinicians had from 2 months to 30 years of experience as anesthesiologists, and trainees inserted 34% and specialists 66% of the catheters, using landmark techniques. Over a period of 2 months, 473 CVC-insertion procedures were included in the investigation.Two patients (0.4%) had a pneumothorax: one was among the 11 cases in which the clinician suspected complications after the procedure, and another was found in a high-risk patient 13 h after CVC insertion. Both patients were treated successfully with chest tubes.The favorite approach was right vena jugularis interna with 324 (69%) catheters; of these patients one had a pneumothorax, catheter-tip placement was correctly predicted in 317 (97%), and no catheters were repositioned. CONCLUSION: In the hands of trained clinicians, insertion of CVCs is a safe procedure. We found no value of routine X-ray control and omission of routine chest X-ray must be considered.