Successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells after addition of ancestim (stem cell factor) in patients who had failed a prior mobilization with filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) alone or with chemotherapy plus filgrastim

This study assessed the ability of recombinant human stem cell factor (rHuSCF) to mobilize stem cells in 44 patients who had failed a prior mobilization (CD34(+) yield 0.5-1.9 x 10(6)/kg BW) with filgrastim-alone or chemotherapy-plus-filgrastim. The same mobilization regimen was used with the addition of rHuSCF. In the filgrastim-alone group (n=13), rHuSCF 20 microg/kg was started 3 days before filgrastim and continued for the duration of filgrastim. In the chemotherapy-plus-filgrastim group (n=31), rHuSCF 20 microg/kg/day plus filgrastim 5-10 microg/kg/day were administered concurrently. Leukaphereses were continued to a maximum of four procedures or a target of >or=3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. In both groups, CD34(+) yield (x 10(6)/kg BW) of the study mobilization was higher than that of the prior mobilization (median: 2.42 vs 0.84 P=0.002 and 1.64 vs 0.99 P=<0.001, respectively). In all 54 and 45% of patients in the filgrastim-alone group and chemotherapy-plus-filgrastim group, respectively, reached the threshold yield of 2 x 10(6)/kg. The probability of a successful mobilization was the same in those with a CD34+ yield of 0.5-0.75 x 10(6)/kg BW in the prior mobilization as in those with 0.76-1.99 x 10(6)/kg BW. Downmodulation of c-kit expression and a lower percentage of Thy-1 positivity in the mobilized CD34(+) cells were noted in the successful mobilizers compared with those in the poor mobilizers. This study shows that rhuSCF is effective in approximately half the patients who had failed a prior mobilization and allows them to proceed to transplant. It also points to the likely role of the SCF/c-kit ligand pair in mobilization.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF): a randomized evaluation of different doses of rhG-CSF

To date, no randomized study has compared different doses of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) following submyeloablative mobilization chemotherapy. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of different doses of rhG-CSF following mobilization chemotherapy on yields of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Fifty patients were randomized to receive 8 (n = 25) versus 16 microg/kg/d (n = 25) of rhG-CSF following mobilization chemotherapy. The median number of CD34+ cells collected after 8 microg/kg/d of rhG-CSF was 2.36 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.21-7.80), compared with 7.99 (2.76-14.89) after 16 microg/kg/d (P < 0.001). Twenty out of 25 (80%) patients in the low-dose and 23 out of 25 (92%) in the high-dose rhG-CSF arm underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Median days to white blood cell engraftment in patients mobilized with 8 microg/kg and 16 microg/kg of rhG-CSF were 12 (10-20) and 9 (8-11) respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups regarding the other parameters of peritransplant morbidity: days to platelet engraftment (P = 0.10), number of red blood cell (P = 0.56) and platelet transfusions (P = 0.22), days of total parenteral nutrition requirement (P = 0.84), fever (P = 0.93) and antibiotics (P = 0.77), and number of different antibiotics used (P = 0.58). These data showed that higher doses of rhG-CSF following submyeloablative mobilization chemotherapy were associated with a clear dose-response effect based on the collected cell yields. Based on the parameters of peritransplant morbidity, 8 microg/kg/d was as effective as 16 microg/kg/d except for a rapid neutrophil engraftment in the high-dose arm. Therefore, in routine clinical practice, despite some advantage in the use of higher doses of rhG-CSF, lower doses may be used for PBSC collections following chemotherapy-based mobilization regimens in this cost-conscious era.     

Stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim after chemotherapy improves peripheral blood progenitor cell yield and reduces apheresis requirements in multiple myeloma patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

Stem cell factor (SCF) has been shown to synergize with filgrastim to mobilize CD34(+) cells into the peripheral blood. To determine if addition of SCF to chemotherapy and filgrastim reduces the number of leukaphereses required to achieve a target yield of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, 102 patients with multiple myeloma were randomized to receive mobilization chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)) and either SCF (20 micrograms/kg/d) combined with filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d) or filgrastim alone (5 micrograms/kg/d), administered daily until leukaphereses were completed. After collection, patients were treated with myeloablative therapy supported by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) infusion and filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d). There was a significant difference between the treatment groups in the number of leukaphereses required to collect 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (median of 1 v 2 for SCF + filgrastim and filgrastim alone, respectively, P =.008). Patients receiving the combination of SCF plus filgrastim had a 3-fold greater chance of reaching 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in a single leukapheresis compared with patients mobilized with filgrastim alone. The median CD34(+) cell yield was significantly increased for the SCF group in the first leukapheresis (11.3 v 4.0 x 10(6)/kg, P =.003) and all leukaphereses (12.4 v 8.2 x 10(6)/kg, P =.007). Total colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and mononuclear cell counts were also significantly higher in the SCF group in the first leukapheresis and in all leukaphereses. As expected for patients mobilized to an optimal CD34(+) cell yield, the time to engraftment was similar between the 2 treatment groups. Cells mobilized with the combination of SCF plus filgrastim were thus considered effective and safe for achieving rapid engraftment. Treatment with SCF plus filgrastim was well tolerated, with mild to moderate injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. There were no serious allergic-like reactions to SCF. The addition of SCF to filgrastim after cyclophosphamide for PBPC mobilization resulted in a significant increase in CD34(+) cell yield and a concomitant reduction in the number of leukaphereses required to collect an optimal harvest of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg.     

A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation

To evaluate the schedule dependency of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization, we conducted a randomized comparison in 50 healthy donors, with one subcutaneous daily injection of 10 microg/kg G-CSF (n = 25) compared with twice injections daily of 5 microg/kg G-CSF (n = 25). The two groups were well balanced for age, body weight and sex. G-CSF application was performed on an out-patient basis and leukapheresis was started in all donors on day 5. The most frequent side-effects of G-CSF were mild to moderate bone pain (88%), mild headache (72%), mild fatigue (48-60%) and nausea (8%) without differences between the two groups. The CD34(+) cell count in the first apheresis was 5.4 x 10(6)/kg donor weight (range 2.8-13.3) in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group compared with 4.0 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.4-8.8) in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group (P = 0.007). The target of collecting > 3.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg donor weight with one apheresis procedure was achieved in 24/25 (96%) donors in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group and in 17/25 (68%) donors in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group. The target of collecting > 5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the first apheresis was achieved in 64% in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group, but in only 36% in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group. The progenitor cell assay for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) was higher in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group than in the 1 x 10 microg/kg group (7.0 vs. 3.5 x 10(5)/kg, P = 0.01; 6.6 vs. 5.0 x 10(5)/kg; P = 0.1). Administering G-CSF (filgrastim) at a dosage of 5 microg/kg twice daily rather than 10 microg/kg once daily is recommended; this leads to a higher CD34(+) cell yield and requires fewer apheresis procedures without increasing toxicity or cost.     

Optimising parameters for peripheral blood leukapheresis after r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) and r-metHuSCF (ancestim) in patients with multiple myeloma: a temporal analysis of CD34(+) absolute counts and subsets

Patients (n = 69) with multiple myeloma undergoing peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) were treated with cyclophosphamide and a combination of recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF, filgrastim) and recombinant methionyl human stem cell factor (r-metHuSCF, ancestim). The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) The proportion of patients reaching a target yield of >or=5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in one or two successive large-volume (20 liter) leukapheresis procedures; (2) the optimal collection time for leukapheresis; (3) mobilization kinetics of CD34(+) subsets in response to G-CSF/SCF. All patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (2.5 g/m(2)) on day 0 followed by filgrastim (10 microg/kg ) plus ancestim (20 microg/kg) commencing day 1 and continuing to day 11 or 12. Of the 65 evaluable patients, 57 were considered not heavily pretreated and 96.5% obtained a target of >or=5 x 10(6)/kg in one collection. The median CD34(+) cells/kg was 39.5 x 10(6) (range: 5.2-221.2 x 10(6)). Subset analysis demonstrated the number of CD38(-), CD33(-), and CD133(+) peaked at day 11; and CD34(+), CD90(+) cells peaked at day 10. The optimum day for leukapheresis was determined to be day 11. The median absolute peripheral blood CD34(+) cell numbers on day 11 was 665 x 10(6)/l (range: 76-1481 x 10(6)/l). Eight of the 10 heavily pretreated patients were evaluable: three achieved the target dose in one leukapheresis (37.5%) and three (37.5%) achieved the target dose with two leukaphereses. Use of this mobilization strategy allowed the collection of high numbers of CD34(+) cells and early progenitors and the ability to predictably schedule leukapheresis.     

Ancestim (recombinant human stem cell factor, SCF) in association with filgrastim does not enhance chemotherapy and/or growth factor-induced peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with a prior insufficient PBPC collection

Up to a third of autologous transplantation candidates fail to mobilize hematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood with chemotherapy and/or growth factor treatment, thus requiring innovative mobilization strategies. In total, 20 cancer patients unable to provide adequate PBPC products after a previous mobilization attempt were treated with ancestim (20 microg/kg/day s.c.) and filgrastim (10 microg/kg/day s.c.). In 16 patients, the pre-study mobilization was with filgrastim alone. Eight patients underwent single large volume leukapheresis (LVL) and 12 multiple standard volume leukaphereses (SVL) in both mobilizations. Pairwise comparison of peripheral blood CD34(+) cell concentrations on the day of first leukapheresis failed to document synergism - median CD34(+)/microl of 3.2 (<0.1 to 15.4) and 4.5 (1-28.56) for the pre-study and on-study mobilizations (P = 0.79, sign test), and 4.2 (<0.1-15.4) and 5 (1-28.56), respectively, for the 16 patients previously mobilized with filgrastim alone (P = 1, sign test). The number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected per unit of blood volume (BV) processed was similar in both mobilizations - median 0.1 x 10(6)/kg/BV and 0.09 x 10(6)/kg/BV, respectively (P = 1, sign test). In this phase II study, the combination of ancestim and filgrastim did not allow adequate PBPC mobilization and collection in patients with a previous suboptimal PBPC collection.     

Analysis of stem cell apheresis products using intermediate-dose filgrastim plus large volume apheresis for allogeneic transplantation

Previously, a dose-dependent influence of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) on CD34+ mobilization was demonstrated. In this single-center prospective analysis, 52 healthy donors were investigated to determine the efficacy of intermediate-dose rhG-CSF 2x8 microg/kg donor body weight (bw) and intermediate large volume apheresis (LVA, median 12 l) to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for allogeneic transplantation. The median number of CD34+ cells in apheresis products was 0.45% and 2.2x10(6)/kg recipient bw per single apheresis. A total of 5.4x10(6)/kg CD34+ cells were collected with two (range: one to three) LVA. In the analysis of donor subgroups, higher peripheral blood (PB) and apheresis results were obtained in male vs female donors; however, donor weight significantly differed in both groups. Heavier donors displayed higher PB and apheresis CD34+ counts; however, when CD34+ cells/kg were adjusted to a constant bw, similar harvest results were calculated in males and females, demonstrating that gender per se does not, whereas bw does affect apheresis results. Younger donors had significantly higher PB CD34+ counts, higher CD34+ numbers per single apheresis, increased CFU, more T, B, and CD61+, comparable NK, and less CD14+ cells. A correlation analysis of donor age and apheresis results displayed an age-related decline of 0.46x10(6)/kg CD34 cells per decade of donor aging. Cell subsets in apheresis products were CD14 (49%), CD3 (22%), CD4 (13%), CD8 (7%), CD61 (20%), CD19 (5%), and CD16/56+ (3%) cells, with increasing CD14+ cells and decreasing CD3, CD4, CD8, CD61, CD19, and CD16/56+ cells on subsequent days of apheresis. Compared to our previous analysis using high- (2x12 microg) and low-dose (1x10 microg) rhG-CSF for allogeneic PBPC mobilization, the intermediate-dose showed a similar CD34+ mobilization potential to 1x10 microg rhG-CSF; however, with use of LVA, two instead of three (p<0.05) aphereses were sufficient to mobilize > or =4x10(6)/kg bw CD34+ cells in most donors. Taken together, our results demonstrate that intermediate-dose rhG-CSF sufficiently mobilizes > or =4x10(6)/kg x bw CD34+ cells with use of LVA and that especially younger donors display increased CD34+ cell numbers.     

A randomized trial of assessment of efficacy of leukapheresis volumes, 8 liters vs 12 liters

It is logical to expect that large-volume leukapheresis may be able to collect adequate numbers of PBSC with fewer procedures. To date, there is no agreement on the optimal volume of leukapheresis. Therefore, in this study we compared 8 l volume with 12 l and assessed whether a 50% increase in the blood volume processed would decrease the number of leukaphereses each patient needed to collect > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in normal mobilizers. PBSC mobilization was done with cyclophosphamide etoposide followed by rhG-CSF in all patients. Forty patients were randomized to undergo 8 l leukaphereses (n = 20 patients) or 12 l leukaphereses (n = 20). The median numbers of leukaphereses required in order to collect > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in patients processed with 8 l and 12 l were 1 (range 1-5) and 1 (1-4), respectively (P = 0.50). The median number of total nucleated cells (TNC) collected per patient was greater for the 12 l group (7.47 x 10(8)/kg vs 3.90 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001), as was the median number of total mononuclear cells (TMNC) (4.26 x 10(8)/kg vs 2.16 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between the two groups for the median number of CD34(+)cells collected per patient (8.94 x 10(6)/kg vs 8.60 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.85). The TNCs and TMNCs collected per leukapheresis were again greater for the 12 l group (3.64 x 10(8)/kg vs 1.91 x 10(8)/kg, P = 0.001 and 2.17 x 10(8)/kg vs 0.88 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between the two groups for the median number of CD34(+) cells collected per leukapheresis (3.98 x 10(6)/kg vs 3.26 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.90). This study showed that there is no difference between 8 l and 12 l volumes in regard to collected CD34(+) cells/kg and also the use of a 12 l leukapheresis volume did not decrease the number of leukaphereses performed compared with a 8 l leukapheresis volume. In fact, the use of the larger leukapheresis volume had the disadvantage of adding 60 min to the time the patient was on the machine.     

Etoposide (VP-16) plus G-CSF mobilizes different dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that are critical to the generation of immunologic tumor responses. Myeloid DCs (DC1) express myeloid antigen CD11c; lymphoid DCs (DC2) express CD123(+) and are CD11c(-). Analysis of DC subsets from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected from normal donors mobilized with G-CSF shows a predominance of DC2 cells. Whether PBPCs mobilization by chemotherapy yields different subsets of DCs has not been studied. We analyzed DC subsets in apheresis products from 44 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation from 6/00 to 5/01. Patients received either G-CSF alone (10 microg/kg per day, n=11) or etoposide (2 g/m(2)) plus G-CSF (n=33) for progenitor cell mobilization. The patients were apheresed for 2-10 days (median 3) to reach a minimum of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Patients receiving G-CSF alone mobilized significantly more total DC2s than did those receiving etoposide plus G-CSF (median 6.2 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.9 x 10(6)/kg, P=0.001). The DC2/DC1 ratio was also significantly different in the two groups, with the G-CSF group having a higher ratio (median 1.2 vs 0.4, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of chemotherapy plus G-CSF yields different mobilized dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone.     

Association of CD34 cell dose with hematopoietic recovery, infections, and other outcomes after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation

Although CD34 cell dose is known to influence outcome of peripheral stem cell- and/or T-cell-depleted transplantation, such data on unmanipulated marrow transplantation are scarce. To study the influence of CD34(+) cell dose on hematopoietic reconstitution and incidence of infections after bone marrow transplantation, we retrospectively analyzed 212 patients from January 1994 to August 1999 who received a transplant of an unmanipulated graft from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Median age was 31 years; 176 patients had hematologic malignancies. Acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted mainly in cyclosporin associated with methotrexate (n = 174). Median number of bone marrow nucleated cells and CD34(+) cells infused were 2.4 x 10(8)/kg and 3.7 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. A CD34(+) cell dose of 3 x 10(6)/kg or more significantly influenced neutrophil (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37, P =.04), monocyte (HR = 1.47, P =.02), lymphocyte (HR = 1.70, P =.003), erythrocyte (HR = 1.77, P =.0002), and platelet (HR = 1.98, P =.00008) recoveries. CD34(+) cell dose also influenced the incidence of secondary neutropenia (HR = 0.60, P =.05). Bacterial and viral infections were not influenced by CD34 cell dose, whereas it influenced the incidence of fungal infections (HR = 0.41, P =.008). Estimated 180-day transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and 5-year survival were 25% and 56%, respectively, and both were highly affected by CD34(+) cell dose (HR = 0.55, P =.006 and HR = 0.54, P =.03, respectively). Five-year survival and 180-day TRM were, respectively, 64% and 19% for patients receiving a CD34(+) cell dose of 3 x 10(6)/kg or more and 40% and 37% for the remainders. In conclusion a CD34(+) cell dose of 3 x 10(6)/kg or more improved all hematopoietic recoveries, decreased the incidence of fungal infections and TRM, and improved overall survival.     

Allogeneic transplantation of CD34(+) selected cells from peripheral blood from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings: detrimental effect of a high number of donor CD34(+) cells?

Clinical results after T-cell-depleted allografts might be improved by modifying the graft content of progenitor and accessory cells. Although the association of the number of donor T cells with the clinical outcome has been studied extensively, the optimum number of progenitor cells that should be administered to patients is unknown. The characteristics of 84 consecutive human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling transplants of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells depleted of T cells by CD34(+) positive selection (allo-PBT/CD34(+)) were analyzed for their effect on clinical outcome. After a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 1-70 months), 50 patients remain alive (59.5%) and 34 have died (21 [25%] as a result of the transplant and 13 [15.5%] due to disease relapse). The median number of CD34(+) cells administered to the patients was 3.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 1.2-14.3 x 10(6)/kg). A number of CD34(+) cells in the inoculum of 1 x 10(6)/kg to 3 x 10(6)/kg was associated with increased survival: 21 of 28 (75%) patients are alive, as compared with 29 of 56 (52%) patients receiving more than 3 x 10(6)/kg (actuarial probability 75% vs. 42%, respectively; P =.01). In the multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic variables for survival were CD34(+) cell dose 1 x 10(6)/kg to 3 x 10(6)/kg (RR = 4.8; P =.0008), sex-pairing match (RR = 3.2; P =.002), and early stage of disease (RR = 2.8; P =.007). From these results it appears that, in allo-PBT/CD34(+) from HLA-identical siblings, a number of CD34(+) cells in the inoculum between 1 x 10(6)/kg to 3 x 10(6)/kg is an important factor for better survival, and that higher CD34(+) cell doses might be associated with a poorer outcome.     

Administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to normal donors: results of the Spanish National Donor Registry. Spanish Group of Allo-PBT.

A Spanish National PBPC Donor Registry has recently been established for short- and long-term safety data collection in normal donors receiving rhG-CSF. To date, 466 donors have been included in the Registry. Median (range) dose and duration of rhG-CSF administration was 10 microg/kg/day (4-20) and 5 days (4-8), respectively. Donors underwent a median of two aphereses (range, 1-5). Adverse effects consisted mainly of bone pain (90.2%), headache (16.9%) and fever (6. 1%), but no donor discontinued rhG-CSF prematurely due to toxicity. Side-effects were more frequent in donors receiving >10 microg/kg/day than in those with lower doses (82.8% vs 61.8%; P = 0. 004). A significant decrease between baseline and post-apheresis platelet counts was the most important analytical finding (229 x 10(9)/l vs 140 x 10(9)/l; P < 0.0001), with a progressive reduction in platelet count with each apheresis procedure. One donor developed pneumothorax that required hospitalization due to central venous line placement. The mean CD34+ cell dose collected was 6.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 1.3-36), with only 14 donors (2.9%) not achieving a minimum target of CD34+ cells of 2 x 10(6)/kg. No definitive information about potential long-term side effects is yet available. However, we hope this National Registry will serve as a useful basis for better monitoring of the efficiency and side-effects of cytokine administration in healthy people.     

Efficacy of further attempts to mobilize CD34+ peripheral stem cells with alternative procedures after primary failure

19 patients who failed the target collection of at least 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg underwent further mobilization procedures either with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone after failure to chemotherapy plus G-CSF (group 1), or with chemotherapy plus G-CSF (group 2), or with high-dose G-CSF (24 microg/kg) alone (group 3) after failure to respond to standard dose of G-CSF (10 microg/kg) alone. In all groups, an increase in median CD34+ cell yield could be observed following alternative procedures (1.1- to 1.9 x 10(6) kg; p = 0.02). The highest increase in CD34+ cell harvest was achieved in group 1 (0.85 to 2.2 x 10(6) kg), followed by group 2 (1. 2 to 1.7) and group 3 (1.0 to 1.4), but without statistically significant difference between the mobilization technologies. All patients with more than 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in the first apheresis procedure reached the overall target of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after a second or subsequent mobilization procedure. In contrast, only 3 of 8 patients (37%) with less than 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells in the first harvest could reach the target of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells after further mobilization attempts.     

The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients

A study was conducted to compare the efficiency and toxicity of two peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization procedures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Patients from group 1 (n=51) were treated by high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) plus G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day), and the second group (n=31) by VAD regimen plus G-CSF administration (10 microg/kg/day). Successful mobilization, defined by a minimal count of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg collected, was achieved in 96 and 90% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.15). The mean peripheral blood CD34(+) cells concentration and the mean CD34(+) cells/kg collected were higher in group 2 than in the group 1 (P=0.05). The mean number of leukaphereses necessary to collect a count of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg was reduced in group 2 compared to group 1. Adverse events, blood products consumption and time spent in the hospital were significantly greater after HD-CY. In conclusion, VAD plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg administration seems preferential to HD-CY plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for PBSC collection because of equivalent or better efficiency in stem cell mobilization, strong favorable toxicity profile and reduced cost.     

Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg)

We investigated the schedule dependency of G-CSF (10 microg/kg) alone in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in breast cancer patients. After a median of three cycles (range, 2-6) of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 49 patients with breast cancer (stage II/III, > or = 10+ Ln n = 36; locally advanced/inflammatory n = 8, stage IV (NED) n = 5) underwent PBPC collection after steady-state mobilization either with 1 x 10 microg/kg (n = 27) or with 2 x 5 microg/kg (n = 22) G-CSF daily for 4 consecutive days until completion of apheresis. Apheresis was started on day 5. Priming with 2 x 5 microg/kg resulted in a higher median number of CD34+ cells (5.8 vs 1.9 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.003), MNC (6.6 vs 2.6 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001) and CFU-GM (6.5 vs 1.3 x 10(4)/kg, P = 0.001) in the first apheresis than with 1 x 10 microg/kg. Also the overall number of collected BFU-E was higher in the 2 x 5 microg group (9.2 vs 3.1 x 10(4)/kg; P = 0.01). After high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/thiotepa/mitoxantrone (n = 46) hematopoietic engraftment with leukocyte count > 1.0/nl was reached in both groups after a median of 10 days (range, 8-15) and with platelets count > 50/nl after 12 (range, 9-40) and 13 days (range, 12-41), respectively. A threshold of > 2.5 x 10(6)/kg reinfused CD34+ cells ensured rapid platelet engraftment (12 vs 17 days; P = 0.12). Therefore, the target of collecting > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells was achieved in 21/27 (80%) patients of the 1 x 10 microg group and in 21/22 (95%) patients of the 2 x 5 microg/kg group with a median of two aphereses (range, 1-4). None in the 10 microg/kg group, but 6/22 (28%) patients in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group required only one apheresis procedure, resulting in fewer apheresis procedures in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group (mean, 1.8 vs 2.3, P = 0.01). These results demonstrate that priming with 10 microg/kg G-CSF alone is well tolerated and effective in mobilizing sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells in breast cancer patients and provide prompt engraftment after CTM high-dose chemotherapy. G-CSF given 5 microg/kg twice daily (2 x 5 microg) leads to a higher harvest of CD34+ cells and required fewer apheresis procedures than when given 10 microg/kg once daily (1 x 10 microg).     

Diagnostic and clinical relevance of the number of circulating CD34(+) cells in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.

The absolute content of CD34(+) cells in the peripheral blood of 84 patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) and 23 patients with other Philadelphia-negative (Ph(-)) chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMDs) was investigated. In MMM, the median absolute number of circulating CD34(+) cells was consistently high (91.6 x 10(6)/L; range, 0-2460 x 10(6)/L). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 15 x 10(6)/L as a decision criterion for CD34(+) cells produced an almost complete discrimination between MMM patients out of therapy and other Ph(-) CMDs (positive predictive value, 98.4%; negative predictive value, 85.0%). MMM patients with higher numbers of CD34(+) cells had a significantly longer disease duration (P =.019) and higher spleen volume index (P =.014), liver volume (P =.000), percentage of circulating immature myeloid cells (P =.020), and percentage of myeloid blasts (P =.000). When CD34(+) cells were correlated with the use of Dupriez risk stratification, CD34(+) cells increased significantly from low-risk (median, 68.1 x 10(6)/L) to intermediate-risk (median, 112.8 x 10(6)/L) and high-risk patients (median 666.1 x 10(6)/L) (F = 4.95; P =.009). When CD34(+) cells were correlated with a severity score on the basis of both myeloproliferative and myelodepletive characteristics of the disease, only the myeloproliferation index was significantly associated with CD34(+) cell level (F = 5.7; P =.000). Overall survival and interval to blast transformation from the time of CD34(+) cell analysis were significantly shorter in patients with more than 300 x 10(6)/L CD34(+) cells (P =.005 and.0005, respectively). In conclusion, the absolute number of CD34(+) circulating cells allows MMM to be distinguished from other Ph(-) CMDs; it is strongly associated with the extent of myeloproliferation and predicts evolution toward blast transformation.     

Myelopoietin, a chimeric agonist of human interleukin 3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptors, mobilizes CD34+ cells that rapidly engraft lethally x-irradiated nonhuman primates.

Myelopoietin (MPO), a multifunctional agonist of interleukin 3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptors, was evaluated for its ability to mobilize hematopoietic colony-forming cells (CFC) and CD34+ cells relative to control cytokines in normal nonhuman primates. Additionally, the engraftment potential of MPO-mobilized CD34+ cells was assessed in lethally irradiated rhesus monkeys. Normal rhesus monkeys were administered either MPO (200 microg/kg/day), daniplestim (a high-affinity interleukin 3 receptor agonist) (100 microg/kg/day), G-CSF (100 microg/kg/day), or daniplestim coadministered with G-CSF (100 microg/kg/day each), subcutaneously for 10 consecutive days. The mobilization kinetics were characterized by peripheral blood (PB) complete blood counts, hematopoietic CFC [granulocyte-macrophage CFC (GM-CFC), megakaryocyte CFC (MK-CFC)], and the immunophenotype (CD34+ cells) of PB nucleated cells prior to and on day 3 to days 7, 10, 12, and 14, and at intervals up to day 28 following initiation of cytokine administration. A single large-volume leukapheresis was conducted on day 5 in an additional cohort (n = 10) of MPO-mobilized animals. Eight of these animals were transplanted with two doses of CD34+ cells/kg. A maximum 10-fold increase in PB leukocytes (white blood cells) (from baseline 7.8-12.3 x 10(3)/microL to approximately 90 x 10(3)/microL) was observed over day 7 to day 10 in the MPO, G-CSF, or daniplestim+G-CSF cohorts, whereas daniplestim alone stimulated a less than onefold increase. A sustained, maximal rise in PB-derived GM-CFC/mL was observed over day 4 to day 10 for the MPO-treated cohort, whereas the daniplestim+G-CSF, G-CSF alone, and daniplestim alone treated cohorts were characterized by a mean peak value on days 7, 6, and 18, respectively. Mean peak values for PB-derived GM-CFC/mL were greater for MPO (5,427/mL) than for daniplestim+G-CSF (3,534/mL), G-CSF alone (3,437/mL), or daniplestim alone (155/mL) treated cohorts. Mean peak values for CD34+ cells/mL were noted within day 4 to day 5 of cytokine administration: MPO (255/microL, day 5), daniplestim+G-CSF (47/microL, day 5), G-CSF (182/microL, day 4), and daniplestim (96/microL, day 5). Analysis of the mobilization data as area under the curve indicated that for total CFCs, GM-CFC, MK-CFC, or CD34+ cells, the MPO-treated areas under the curve were greater than those for all other experimental cohorts. A single, large-volume (3.0 x blood volume) leukapheresis at day 5 of MPO administration (PB: CD34+ cell/microL = 438 +/- 140, CFC/mL = 5,170 +/- 140) resulted in collection of sufficient CD34+ cells (4.31 x 10(6)/kg +/- 1.08) and/or total CFCs (33.8 x 10(4)/kg +/- 8.34) for autologous transplantation of the lethally irradiated host. The immunoselected CD34+ cells were transfused into autologous recipients (n = 8) at cell doses of 2 x 10(6)/kg (n = 5), and 4 x 10(6)/kg (n = 3) on the day of apheresis. Successful engraftment occurred with each cell dose. The data demonstrated that MPO is an effective and efficient mobilizer of PB progenitor cells and CD34+ cells, such that a single leukapheresis procedure results in collection of sufficient stem cells for transplantation and long term engraftment of lethally irradiated hosts.     

An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy

The CD34 antigen is expressed by committed and uncommitted hematopoietic progenitor cells and is increasingly used to assess stem cell content of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections. Quantitative CD34 expression in PBPC collections has been suggested to correlate with engraftment kinetics of PBPCs infused after myeloablative therapy. We analyzed the engraftment kinetics as a function of CD34 content in 692 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients had PBPCs collected after cyclophosphamide based mobilization chemotherapy with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) until > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were harvested. Measurement of the CD34 content of PBPC collections was performed daily by a central reference laboratory using a single technique of CD34 analysis. Forty-five patients required a second mobilization procedure to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 15 patients with less than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg available for infusion received HDC. A median of 9.94 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 0.5 to 112.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) contained in the PBPC collections was subsequently infused into patients after the administration of HDC. Engraftment was rapid with patients requiring a median of 9 days (range, 5 to 38 days) to achieve a neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L and a median of 9 days (range, 4 to 53+ days) to achieve a platelet count of > or = 20 x 10(9)/L. A clear dose-response relationship was evident between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused and neutrophil and platelet engraftment kinetics. Factors potentially influencing the engraftment kinetics of neutrophil and platelet recovery were examined using a Cox regression model. The single most powerful mediator of both platelet (P = .0001) and neutrophil (P = .0001) recovery was the CD34 content of the PBPC product. Administration of a post-PBPC infusion myeloid growth factor was also highly correlated with neutrophil recovery (P = .0001). Patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin had more rapid platelet recovery than patients receiving other regimens (P = .006), and patients requiring 2 mobilization procedures versus 1 mobilization procedure to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg experienced slower platelet recovery (P = .005). Although a minimal threshold CD34 dose could not be defined, > or = 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg appears to be optimal for ensuring rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery.     

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF

We assessed the mobilization capacity of taxol with rhG-CSF, both as a single chemotherapeutic agent and in the presence of cyclophosphamide (CY), and compared the effect with yields achieved when mobilization was performed solely with rhG-CSF. Fifteen patients with breast cancer received taxol 170 mg/m2 (continuous infusion, day 1) and rhG-CSF (8 microg/kg/day, from day 2 until the end of apheresis) (T-G group), while seven breast cancer patients were additionally treated with CY (4 g/m2) on day 2, followed by rhG-CSF starting at similar doses on day 3 (T-CY-G group). The PBSC collections after taxol with/without CY were compared with those of 30 breast cancer patients who had received rhG-CSF (8 microg/kg/day) for mobilization. No differences were found in the characteristics of patients included in any of the three mobilization groups. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients included in taxol containing schedules was 9 x 106/kg (range 2-26) collected with a median of one apheresis procedure (range 1-4). Leukaphereses began earlier in the T-G group (median day 8, range 7-10) than in the T-CY-G group (median day 13, range 11-17). In most patients (20 out of 22) who received taxol containing regimens, more than 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, a threshold considered to be sufficient for hematopoietic reconstitution, were collected with a single apheresis. Those patients in the T-G group experienced less neutropenic and thrombocytopenic days, with all neutropenic fever episodes developing in patients treated with the T-CY-G schedule (43%). When considering priming with rhG-CSF alone in our historical cohort of 30 breast cancer patients, a significant detrimental effect was observed in comparison with taxol mobilizing schedules, in the number of aphereses performed, in the total yield CD34+cells and in the number of patients who achieved the target dose of 2.5 x 106/kg CD34+ cells within the first collection procedure. We conclude that taxol containing schedules are effective in mobilizing PBSC and facilitate the collection of high yields of CD34+ cells (usually more than 5 x 106/kg recipient body weight) with a reduced number of apheresis procedures. Taxol, as a single agent with rhG-CSF, exhibits less hematological toxicity than the combination chemotherapy mobilization regimen including CY. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 231-235.     

Analysis of remobilization success in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplants who fail an initial mobilization: risk factors, cytokine use and cost

Inadequate stem cell mobilization is seen in approximately 25% of patients undergoing autotransplantation for hematologic malignancies. Remobilization strategies include chemotherapy/cytokine combinations or high-dose cytokines alone or in combination. From 1/1997 to 7/2002, we remobilized 86 patients who failed an initial mobilization (median total CD34=0.72 x 10(6)/kg) in sequential cohorts using high-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) or G-CSF(10 microg/kg/day)+GM-CSF (5 microg/kg/day). No difference in CD34/kg yields were seen (G-CSF alone: 2.2 x 10(6) and G-CSF+GM-CSF 1.6 x 10(6)) in the median 3 aphereses performed (P=0.333). Of the 86, 23 (27%) failed the second mobilization; 14 were remobilized again (yield=1.5 x 10(6) CD34/kg; three aphereses). Of the 86, 93% went to transplant: three progressed, and three had inadequate stem cells. Significant risk factors for a failed remobilization were: number of stem-cell-damaging regimens (P=0.015), time between last chemotherapy and first mobilization (P=0.028), and higher WBC at initiation of first mobilization (P=0.04). High-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) was more costly @ USD $9,016, vs $5,907 for the G-CSF+GM-CSF combination (P<0.001). Most patients failing an initial mobilization benefit from a cytokine only remobilization. Lower cost G-CSF+GM-CSF is as effective as high-dose G-CSF.