Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference"

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the measured real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) of audiometer output with the derived real-ear SPL obtained by adding the coupler to dial difference (CDD) and real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) to the audiometer dial reading. DESIGN: The real-ear SPL and RECD were measured in one ear of 16 normally hearing subjects using a probe-tube microphone. The CDD transform and the RECD transfer function were measured in an HA1 and an HA2 2-cc coupler using an EAR-LINK foam ear-tip or a customized earmold. The RECD transfer function was measured using the EARTone ER 3A and the Audioscan RE770 insert earphone. RESULTS: The procedures were very reliable with mean differences on retest of less than 1 dB. The mean difference between the measured and derived real-ear SPL was generally less than 1 dB and rarely exceeded 3 dB in any subject. CONCLUSIONS: The CDD measured for an individual audiometer and the RECD measured for an individual ear can be used to derive a valid estimate of real-ear SPL when it has not been possible to measure this directly.     

Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?

Direct measurement of real-ear hearing aid performance can be obtained using a probe tube microphone system. Alternatively, it can be derived by adding the real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) to the electroacoustic performance of the hearing instrument measured in a 2-cc coupler. Inherent in this derivation is the assumption that the RECD measured with one transducer can be applied to a coupler measurement performed with a different transducer. For the RECD procedure to be valid, it should be independent of the measurement transducer. The Audioscan RM500 is an example of a commercially available real-ear measurement system that incorporates a clinical protocol for the measurement of the RECD. The RECD can be measured on the Audioscan RM500 using a standard EAR-Tone ER-3A insert earphone or the Audioscan's own RE770 insert earphone. The aim of this study was to compare the RECDs obtained with these two earphones. The Audioscan RM500 was used to measure the RECD from the right ears of 18 adult subjects ranging in age from 22 to 36 years (mean 25 years). Measurements were made with the EAR-Tone ER-3A and RE770 insert earphone and three earmould configurations: (1) the EARLINK foam ear-tip; (2) a hard acrylic shell earmould with the same length of acoustical tubing as the foam ear-tip (25 mm); and (3) the shell ear mould with the appropriate length of tubing for a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid fitting (approximately 35-45 mm). The results show that the mean RECD was around 3 dB higher at 1.5 kHz with the foam ear-tip when measured with the RE770 earphone than when measured with the ER-3A earphone. The same magnitude of difference was obtained with the shell earmould and 25-mm tubing; however, this increased to 9 dB when the tubing was increased to around 40 mm for a BTE fitting. The difference in mean RECD with the two earphones was statistically significant on a repeated-measures ANOVA for every earmould configuration (p<0.001). The results of this study demonstrate that the RECD procedure that uses an HA2 coupler and earmould is not independent of the measurement earphone. This has important implications for clinical practice.     

The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the present study was to compare the derived and directly measured real-ear hearing instrument performance for a range of commonly used hearing instruments. A secondary aim was to compare the real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) measured using the ER-3A insert earphone and a selection of hearing instruments. DESIGN: The real-ear SPL was measured for four models of hearing instrument in 20 adult participants using an Audioscan RM500 real-ear system. This was compared with the derived real-ear SPL obtained by adding the RECD (measured using the ER-3A insert earphone) to the 2-cc coupler response of each hearing instrument. Measurements were made at 1/12 octave intervals from 0.2 to 6 kHz, using both the HA1 and HA2 2-cc coupler. In addition, the RECD was measured using four models of hearing instrument for comparison with the ER-3A insert earphone values. RESULTS: The procedures were very reliable with mean differences on retest of less than 1 dB. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences between the measured and derived real-ear SPL (p < 0.001) for several models of hearing instrument. The derived responses using the HA1 coupler yielded good accuracy, whereas the HA2 yielded less accuracy. For three models of hearing instrument, the maximum difference was between 5 and 10 dB when using the HA2 coupler. The mean RECD measured with the ER-3A insert earphone and HA2 coupler was not always equivalent to the RECD measured with the hearing instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the derived real-ear response obtained using an RECD, measured with an ER-3A insert earphone, is very good when an HA1 is used for the coupler component of the RECD. The accuracy diminishes somewhat with the HA2 coupler, especially for undamped hearing instruments. The accuracy of the derived real-ear response is very good when the RECD is measured using the hearing instrument and the HA1 or the HA2 coupler.     

Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the validity of predicting the real-ear aided response by adding customized acoustic transform functions to the performance of a hearing aid in a 2-cc coupler. DESIGN: The real-ear hearing aid response, the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD/HA2), and field to behind-the-ear microphone transfer functions were measured in both ears of 24 normally hearing subjects using probe-tube microphone equipment. The RECD/HA2 transform function was obtained using both insert earphones and with the hearing aid/ pressure comparison method. An RECD/HA2 transfer function was also obtained with a customized earmold, ER-3A foam tip, and an oto-admittance tip. RESULTS: Validity estimates were calculated as the difference between the derived and measured real-ear response. The derived response was generally within 5 dB of the measured real-ear response when it incorporated an RECD/HA2 transform function obtained with a customized earmold for the specific ear in question. Discrepancies increased when the RECD/HA2 transfer function was obtained from the same subject but the opposite ear. There were significant differences between the RECD/HA2 transform function obtained with customized and temporary earmolds. As a result, the derived response incorporating these transforms differed significantly from the measured real-ear response obtained with the customized earmold. The insert earphone and the hearing aid RECD/HA2 transfer function were equally valid. CONCLUSIONS: The derived response may be used as a substitute for in situ hearing aid response procedures when it incorporates acoustic transform functions obtained with a customized earmold from the specific ear in question.     

Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations. DESIGN: The RECD was obtained from both ears of 18 normal hearing adults by subtracting the HA2 2-cc coupler response from the real-ear response using an ER-3A insert earphone and a swept pure tone on the Audioscan RM500 probe-tube microphone system. The measurements were made with a personal earmold, foam eartip, and oto-admittance tip. RESULTS: The mean difference between the right and left RECD was close to 0 dB for all earmold configurations and was not statistically significant on a repeated-measures analysis of variance (p > 0.05). In 90% of participants, the difference between ears was generally less than 3 dB at 0.5 to 4 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: Cooperative participants with non-occluding wax and normal middle ear function (on tympanometry) show small differences in RECD between the right and left ear, irrespective of the earmold configuration. The study has yet to be extended to the clinical setting where subject cooperation and earmold fit may differ from the present study. In the meantime, the findings from the present study indicate that where an RECD can be obtained from only one ear of a participant, it is probably best to use this to derive real-ear SPL of both ears instead of relying on average age appropriate corrections.     

Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the real-ear to coupler difference (RECD) measured with an insert earphone and two models of hearing instrument. DESIGN: The RECD was obtained from one ear of 18 normal-hearing subjects by subtracting the 2-cc coupler (HA1 and HA2) response from a real-ear aided response, using a conventional probe-tube microphone system. The measurements were made with a conventional ER-3A earphone and two models of behind-the-ear hearing instrument (Unitron US80, Unitron, Kitchener, Canada; and Widex Diva, Widex, Vaerloese, Denmark). RESULTS: The procedures were very reliable, with mean differences on retest of less than 1 dB. There were statistically significant differences between the mean RECDs obtained using an insert earphone compared with those obtained with each hearing instrument (p < 0.05). The differences were greatest when using the HA2 2-cc coupler. For example, the maximum difference in mean RECD between the insert earphone and the Widex Diva was 6 dB and 11 dB when using the HA1 and the HA2 2-cc coupler, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RECD is dependent on the acoustic impedance of the sound source, the coupling system, and the coupler and ear. The acoustic impedance may be different for an insert earphone and a given hearing instrument. Therefore, the RECD measured with an insert earphone may not always accurately represent the difference in performance of a hearing instrument measured in the real ear and the 2-cc coupler.     

Interaural attenuation for tubephone insert earphones

Interaural attenuation of pure tone and speech signals was evaluated for a new audiometric insert earphone, the ER-3A tubephone, and a conventional TDH-49P supra-aural earphone in seven unilaterally deaf adult subjects. These results validate and extend the interaural attenuation data reported by the manufacturer of the ER-3A and his associates. At frequencies of 0.5 to 1 kHz, mean interaural attenuation for the deeply inserted ER-3A decreased from 94+ dB to 81 dB, with the lowest value for any subject, 75 dB. Interaural attenuation for speech approximated that of the 1 to 2 kHz frequency range. The ER-3A tubephone provides significantly greater acoustic isolation between the two ears in the low-mid frequency audiometric range than the conventional supra-aural earphone.     

A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.

One of the many reported advantages of the insert earphone over the supra-aural earphone is increased inter-aural attenuation (IA). Minimum values of IA determine the need for masking of the non-test ear in air-conduction audiometry. The aim of the present study was to measure inter-aural attenuation for the Etymotic Research ER-3A insert earphone (with deep and shallow insertion of the ear plug within the ear canal) and compare this with the supra-aural Telephonics TDH-39/MX41-AR earphone/cushion combination. Subjects were 18 adults ranging in age from 38 to 68 years (mean 50 years). Each subject had no hearing in one ear following translabyrinthine surgery for removal of an acoustic neuroma. The opposite ear had hearing thresholds better than 40 dB HL and an air-bone gap of less than 10 dB at any audiometric frequency. Pure tone air-conduction thresholds were obtained in the range 0.25-8 kHz. Deep insertion of the insert earphone was deemed to occur when the outside edge of the ear plug was flush with the entrance of the ear canal. Shallow insertion was deemed to occur when half of the ear plug (6 mm) was inside the entrance of the ear canal. IA was defined operationally as the difference between the good-ear and poor-ear not-masked air conduction threshold for a given audiometric frequency and earphone. The results show that the TDH-39/MX41-AR combination provides a median IA of approximately 60 dB with a lower limit of approximately 45 dB. Greater IA was obtained with the ER-3A insert earphone but this depended on the depth of insertion. With a deep insertion, the 1A values were some 15-20 dB greater than with the supra-aural earphone. Although frequency-specific IA values are provided, a simple rule of thumb is to apply masking to the non-test ear when the pure tone airconduction signal from the ER-3A insert earphone exceeds the bone conduction threshold of the non-test ear by 55 dB HL or more. If it is not possible to obtain a deep insertion depth this value should be reduced by 5 dB.     

Inter-aural attenuation with insert earphones

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine inter-aural attenuation (IA) values for pure tones and a broadband click obtained using an ER-3A insert earphone with a foam plug and with a customized hard acrylic earmould. Participants were 15 adults with a longstanding unilateral dead ear. IA was operationally defined as the difference between the good-ear and poorer-ear not-masked air conduction threshold. Minimum IA values for the foam earplug were 50 dB and 55 dB for pure tones and broadband click, respectively. Minimum IA values for the hard acrylic earmould were 45 dB and 50 dB for pure tones and broadband click, respectively.

Sumario

El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los valores de IA para tonos puros y para un clic de banda ancha utilizando los audífonos de inserción ER-3A con oclusión de esponja y con un molde de acrílico duro a la medida. Participaron 15 adultos con un oído muerto unilateral de larga evolución. Desde el punto de vista operacional se definió IA como la diferencia de umbral por conducción aérea sin enmascarar, entre el oído sano y el dañado. Los valores mínimos de IA con el tapón de esponja fue de 50dB y 55dB para los tonos puros y para el clic de banda ancha respectivamente. Los valores IA mínimos con el molde de acrílico duro fueron de 45dB y 50dB para tonos y clic de banda ancha respectivamente.     

Assessment of FM systems with an ear canal probe tube microphone system

A technique is described to measure the real-ear performance of an FM system using an ear canal probe tube microphone device. The method involves placement of the FM microphone next to the monitoring (compression) microphone of the probe tube assembly to produce a constant sound pressure level input to the FM system. With the probe tube in the ear canal, a hearing aid alone is measured with a 60 dB SPL input and the FM system attached to the hearing aid (personal FM system) is assessed with an 80 dB SPL input to account for the higher input levels that occur due to the 6 inch distance between the speaker's mouth and the FM microphone. This technique permits a rapid comparison of the real-ear response of the hearing aid and the FM system.     

Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the Etymotic Research ER-10C otoacoustic emission probe

Objective: To determine the equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for a commercially available distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) probe, and to study the impact of probe fitting and eartip size on the calibration. Design: Twenty-eight otologically normal test subjects participated in the ETSPL determination for the Etymotic Research ER-10C probe. Study sample: ETSPLs were determined up to 16 kHz and were compared to the reference hearing thresholds associated with the ER-3A insert earphone. Both ‘regular’ and ‘baby’ foam eartips were used. Results: At most frequencies, no significant threshold differences were observed between the insert earphone and the DPOAE probe. However, at 1 kHz and 4 kHz, the mean thresholds for the insert earphone were generally lower than those for the DPOAE probe, suggesting systematic differences at those frequencies. Repeated calibration runs resulted in deviations of about 0.6 dB. Similar deviations were noticed when using foam eartips of different sizes up to 10 kHz. Conclusions: Knowing the reference thresholds for DPOAE probes enables measurements of (subjective) hearing thresholds and (objective) otoacoustic emissions using the same probe. Probe fitting and eartip size had negligible effect on the determination of ETSPLs. The obtained data may be proposed for inclusion in future audiometry standards.     

Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal

The acoustical problems involved in matching the saturation sound pressure level for a 90 dB input signal (SSPL90) of a hearing aid to individual discomfort level were investigated. The real ear SPL (RE/SSPL90) produced by a supra-aural earphone used when measuring uncomfortable loudness (UCL), and RE/SSPL90 produced by three different hearing aids at 90 dB SPL input, were measured for nine subjects, using a miniature microphone technique, and compared to the corresponding coupler levels used when matching hearing aid maximum output to UCL. It was found that a hearing aid often gives about 5 dB, and sometimes 10 dB, higher RE/SPLs than the earphone, if the hearing aid output levels, as measured in a 2-cc coupler (IEC126), are equal to the earphone output levels as measured in a 6-cc coupler (NBS9A). It is recommended that a safety margin of at least 5 dB be used in the preliminary fitting when matching hearing aid SSPL90 to the patient's UCL, converted to dB SPL.     

Attenuation provided by four different audiometric earphone systems

The attenuation provided by TDH earphones in MX-41/AR and P/N 51 cushions, Audiocup earphone enclosures and ER-3A insert earphones with ER3-14 foam earplugs was determined for 30 normally hearing subjects using a real-ear attenuation at threshold paradigm. The MX-41/AR and P/N 51 cushions provided about the same amount of attenuation which was less than the attenuation provided by the Audiocup enclosures. The ER-3A/ER3-14 provided the highest amount of attenuation. The MX-41/AR and ER-3A/ER3-14 attenuation values were in agreement with other studies using similar methodology. However, the attenuation provided by the Audiocup enclosures was considerably less, in the lower frequencies, than reported in two other studies. ANSI S3.1-1977 supra-aural earphone cushion attenuation values, which were determined using pure-tones presented in a free-field, should be replaced by earphone cushion attenuation values determined with 1/3 octave bands of noise presented in a diffuse sound field.     

Perforation of the tympanic membrane and its effect on the real-ear-to-coupler difference acoustic transform function.

It is not always possible to undertake extensive real-ear measurements, especially in infants and young children. An alternative approach is to estimate the real-ear SPL by use of an acoustic transform function such as the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD). This may be used to estimate the real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) obtained from an insert transducer or a hearing instrument. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of tympanic membrane perforation on the RECD transform function. Subjects in the study comprised two groups of 12 individuals aged between nine and 65 years. One group of subjects had a tympanic membrane perforation and was recruited to the study before admission for myringoplasty. There was no evidence of middle ear pathology in the remaining subjects who comprised the control group. An RECD transform function for an insert transducer was measured on each subject using the standard clinical protocol on the Audioscan RM500 real-ear measurement system. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups; mean RECD transform value of the perforation group was 9-12 dB lower than the corresponding value in the control group at audiometric frequencies below 1.5 kHz. This difference is probably due to the perforation acting as a vent and allowing low-frequency acoustic energy to escape into the middle ear cavity. Use of an average RECD transform function to estimate real-ear SPL in subjects with a perforation will overestimate the SPL reaching the tympanic membrane. As a result, the derived real-ear SPL obtained by use of either an insert transducer or a hearing instrument will be overestimated. This has implications for the selection and verification of a hearing instrument. The difference in the mean RECD transform function between the control group and subjects with a tympanic membrane perforation supports the use of individually measured RECD values wherever possible.     

Probe-tube microphone measures in patients with open-mastoid surgery: real-ear-to-coupler differences and real-ear unaided responses

Real-ear-to-coupler differences (RECDs) and real-ear unaided responses (REURs) were measured using a probe-tube microphone system in 15 patients who underwent open mastoid surgery. The results show that RECDs are significantly smaller at higher frequencies (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 6.0 kHz) in mastoid ears. The intrasubject variability of RECDs measures in these patients is on average 2.6 dB larger than for controls. For REURs, mastoid surgery significantly reduced the mean peak resonant frequency without affecting the amplitude and bandwidth. In operated ears, mean resonant frequency is by a factor of 1.4 lower than that for normal ears. Reduced responses (negative gains) at frequencies above the resonance peak occurred in 7 out of the 15 patients. These reduced responses corresponded to the smaller RECD at the middle and high frequencies. The results support the need for individual RECD measures to be made in operated ears instead of using average values from normal subjects. Otherwise, real-ear measures of the aided response should be made for each patient with open-mastoid cavity and the fitting should be done in terms of the target response at the eardrum rather than by defining a target insertion gain.     

Three studies comparing performance of the ER-3A tubephone with the TDH-50P earphone

Three studies compared the performance of the ER-3A Tubephone insert earphone and the TDH-50P-MX41/AR supra-aural earphone. The three factors addressed were: threshold differences in children 7 to 10 yr old compared to adults, differences in real ear attenuation, and threshold differences in the presence of high background noise levels. The influence of insertion depth of the ER-3A Tubephone was also investigated. Findings showed no significant threshold differences between children and adults, significantly better real ear attenuation for the ER-3A Tubephone, and significantly better thresholds for the ER-3A in the presence of high background noise levels. Most critically, there was a significant change in attenuation characteristics of the ER-3A Tubephone, which was dependent on the insertion depth of the ear-tip.     

A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and comparability of the commercially available insert earphone Etymotic Research ER-3A and the commonly available supra-aural TDH earphone. Thirteen subjects were tested five times with the ER-3A and five times with TDH-49P with MX-41/AR cushions. Threshold determinations were obtained utilizing a sweep-frequency audiometer in the range 0.25-8 kHz. The results showed that the reliability of the ER-3A earphone as measured by intra-individual variation, was comparable to that obtained with the TDH earphone. No evidence was found indicating an increased variability due to the positioning of the insert earphone's coupling device in the ear canal. Comparison of thresholds obtained with both devices indicated that the manufacturer's suggested correction values were appropriate.     

Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones

HA coupler type SPLs were independently determined by two experimenters for five repeated measurements with and without replacement of two ER-3A and two EARTONE 3A insert earphones. Measurements were made using a B&K DB-0138 coupler configured as an HA-1, HA-2 earphone coupler and HA-2 earphone coupler with entrance through a rigid tube referred to as the DB-0138 coupler. The HA-1, HA-2, and DB-0138 SPLs were found to be very stable (+/- 0.2 dB) for all intra- and interexperimenter measurements for each insert earphone and coupler type from 125 to 8000 Hz. Averaged across both experimenters and all repeated measurements, the mean HA-1 and HA-2 coupler SPLs were similar for each insert earphone from 125 to 8000 Hz. The mean HA-1, HA-2, and DB-0138 coupler SPLs were similar for each insert earphone from 125 to 2000 Hz; however, from 3000 to 8000 Hz the DB-0138 coupler SPLs were higher than the HA-1 and HA-2 coupler SPLs for each insert earphone. This occurred because of the geometrical differences between the insert earphone to coupler connections and coupler types. The HA-1 minus DB-0138 and HA-2 minus DB-0138 coupler SPL differences, or coupler correction levels, could be explained by quarter-wave resonances and stepped-diameter tubing systems creating acoustic horn effects.     

Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults

The effect of age and earphone condition on test-retest intrasubject variability in audiometric threshold was investigated. Ten subjects in each of the following age groups were investigated: 6-9 years, 10-13 years and young adults. Test-retest audiometric thresholds were collected at six frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 and 8,000 Hz) under three earphone conditions (Telephonics TDH-50P supraaural and Etymotic Research ER-3A insert earphone coupled to an immittance probe cuff or a foam insert). No statistically significant differences were found in variability of test-retest differences as a function of age, earphone condition or test frequency (p greater than 0.05). The clinical application of the insert earphone is recommended with children and adults as it affords no greater test-retest variability and at the same time provides a solution to a number of limitations incurred with the use of the supraaural earphone.