Ambulatory venous pressure measurements: new parameters derived from a mathematic hemodynamic model

PURPOSE: The mechanism of venous pressure decrease during exercise still remains unclear. To explore the components involved with the regulation of ambulatory venous pressure, we reinvestigated the pattern of pressure decrease during tiptoe exercise with a newly developed mathematic model. METHODS: Seventeen healthy limbs of 16 volunteers (normal group) and 35 limbs of 33 patients with signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency were studied. Seventeen limbs had superficial venous incompetence (SVI), and 18 showed deep venous incompetence with or without concomitant superficial venous reflux. All subjects were examined with ambulatory venous pressure measurements. As parameters obtained from serial phasic changes in pressure during tiptoe movements, the pressure reduction fraction per step (decreasing component) and the pressure increase per step (increasing component) were calculated with application of the mathematic hemodynamic model and assessed comparatively in the three groups with different types of reflux (normal, SVI, and deep venous incompetence group). RESULTS: The pressure increase per step was significantly different in each of the three groups (P <.0001, with analysis of variance), whereas no apparent difference was seen in the mean pressure reduction fraction per step among the groups. With addition of the inflation of ankle cuff, the value of pressure increase in limbs with SVI was significantly reduced (P =.0004, with Wilcoxon signed rank test), although no changes were seen in the pressure reduction fraction in each group. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the pressure reduction fraction, representing calf muscle pump function, is independent of the existence or site of valve incompetence. On the other hand, the pressure increase, corresponding to the degree of reflux during exercise, correlates strongly with the severity of venous insufficiency. The theoretic model can separate the two components responsible for ambulatory venous pressure changes, calf muscle pump function and venous reflux, and provide better understanding of venous hemodynamics.     

Iliac venous pressure estimates central venous pressure after laparotomy

Background

Central venous pressure (CVP) is traditionally obtained through subclavian or internal jugular central catheters; however, many patients who could benefit from CVP monitoring have only femoral lines. The accuracy of illiac venous pressure (IVP) as a measure of CVP is unknown, particularly following laparotomy.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study. Patients who had both internal jugular or subclavian lines and femoral lines already in place were eligible for the study. Pressure measurements were taken from both lines in addition to measurement of bladder pressure, mean arterial pressure, and peak airway pressure. Data were evaluated using paired t-test, Bland-Altman analysis, and linear regression.

Results

Measurements were obtained from 40 patients, 26 of which had laparotomy. The mean difference between measurements was 2.2 mm Hg. There were no significant differences between patients who had laparotomy and nonsurgical patients (P = 0.93). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 1.63 ± 2.44 mm Hg. There was no correlation between IVP accuracy and bladder pressure, mean arterial pressure, or peak airway pressure.

Conclusions

IVP is an adequate measure of CVP, even in surgical patients who have had recent laparotomy. Measurement of IVP to guide resuscitation is encouraged in patients who have only femoral venous catheter access.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: mean blood pressure and blood pressure load

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is commonly used to diagnose pediatric hypertension. Using ABPM, hypertension is usually defined as a mean BP greater than the 95th percentile for height. A BP load >30% (% of BP readings greater than the 95th percentile) is also used for the diagnosis of hypertension. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load for the diagnosis of hypertension using ABPM. All ABPM records (n =1,009) of patients referred for hypertension to a pediatric center were retrieved. Scans were excluded if: age was >19 and height <115 cm or >185 cm. Mean BP and BP loads were calculated for 728 scans. Agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile for height and various BP loads were calculated using the kappa coefficient. The kappa coefficient of agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load was 0.56 and 0.57 for daytime systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. The agreement between mean night-time BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load was 0.70 and 0.66 for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. Agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load is only moderate to good. Maximum agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and BP load is achieved at 50% BP load.     

Peripheral venous pressure predicts central venous pressure poorly in pediatric patients

Purpose: Using peripheral venous pressure (PVP) instead of central venous pressure (CVP) as a volume monitor decreases patient risks and costs, and is convenient. This study was undertaken to determine if PVP predicts CVP in pediatric patients. METHODS: With ethical approval and informed consent, 30 pediatric patients aged neonate to 12 yr requiring a central venous line were studied prospectively in a tertiary care teaching hospital. In the supine position, PVP and CVP were simultaneously transduced. Ninety-six paired recordings of CVP and PVP were made. Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis of agreement of end-expiratory measurements were performed. RESULTS: The mean (SD; range) CVP was 10.0 mmHg (6.0; -1.0 to 27.0); the mean PVP was 13.7 mmHg (6.3; 0.0 to 33.0); offset (bias) of PVP > CVP was 3.7 mmHg with SD 2.6. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the bias were 3.2 to 4.1 mmHg. In the Bland-Altman analysis, lower and upper limits of agreement (LOA; CI in parentheses) were -1.5 (-2.3 to -0.7) and 8.8 (8.1 to 9.6) mmHg. Eight of 96 points were outside the limits of agreement. The correlation of PVP on CVP was r = 0.92, P < 0.0001. For a subset of ten patients (20 simultaneous recordings) with iv catheters proximal to the hand, limits of agreement were better - offset: 3.8 mmHg (+/- 1.4); lower LOA: 1.2 mmHg (0.25 to 2.1); upper LOA: 6.6 mmHg (5.7 to 7.5). CONCLUSION: Peripheral venous pressure measured from an iv catheter in the hand predicts CVP poorly in pediatric patients.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in healthy schoolchildren

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in 564 healthy schoolchildren during normal circadian activities. The data of two cohorts (155 boys and 139 girls aged 9–13 years and 184 boys and 168 girls with a body height between 120 and 155 cm) are presented. From the age of 9 to 13 years the mean 24-h systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) increases from 107±9/ 66 ± 7 mmHg to 115 ± 13/68 ± 9 mmHg in boys and from 104 ± 5/64 ± 6 mmHg to 109 ± 8/65 ± 9 mmHg in girls. When related to body height the values rise from 105 ± 6/ 64 ± 6 mmHg at 120 cm to 113 ± 8/67 ± 7 mmHg at 155 cm in boys and from 100±7/65±7 mmHg to 112±9/ 66 ± 9 mmHg in girls. In comparison with the casual blood pressure data obtained from European studies, the presented ABPM values (daytime BP) are higher throughout, which may be explained by the increased activity during daytime with ABPM. There is a mean difference of 4.4 mmHg in boys and of 3.0 mmHg in girls for SBP and of 10.8 mmHg in boys and of 9.0 mmHg in girls for DBP when related to age. In relation to body height, there is a mean difference of 4.4 mmHg in boys and of 3.5 mmHg in girls for SBP and of 10.9 mmHg in boys and of 10.5 mmHg in girls for DBP. We conclude that standards derived from casual blood pressure measurements should not be used for the evaluation of ABPM data.     

Correlation of peripheral venous pressure and central venous pressure in kidney recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Previous studies in adults have demonstrated a clinically useful correlation between central venous pressure (CVP) and peripheral venous pressure (PVP). The current study prospectively compared CVP measurements from a central versus a peripheral catheter in kidney recipients during renal transplantation. METHODS: With ethics committee approval and informed consent, 30 consecutive kidney recipients were included in the study. We excluded patients who had significant valvular disease or clinically apparent left ventricular failure. For each of 30 patients, CVP and PVP were measured on five different occasions. The pressure tubing of the transducer system was connected to the distal lumen of the central or to the peripheral venous catheter for measurements following induction of anesthesia, after induction, 1 hour after induction, reperfusion of the kidney, and the end of the operation, yielding 150 hemodynamic data points. Each hemodynamic measurement included heart rate, mean arterial pressure, mean CVP, and mean PVP determined at end-expiration. RESULTS: The mean PVP was 13.5 +/- 1.8 mm Hg and the mean CVP was 11.0 +/- 1.5 mm Hg during surgery. The mean difference was 2.5 +/- 0.5 (P < .01). Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated a highly significant relationship between PVP and CVP (P < .01) with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, PVP showed a consistently high agreement with CVP in the perioperative period among patients without significant cardiac dysfunction.     

Correlation of peripheral venous pressure and central venous pressure in surgical patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of agreement between central venous pressure (CVP) and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) in surgical patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients without cardiac dysfunction undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery (n = 150). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Simultaneous CVP and PVP measurements were obtained at random points in mechanically ventilated patients during surgery (n = 100) and in spontaneously ventilating patients in the postanesthesia care unit (n = 50). In a subset of 10 intraoperative patients, measurements were made before and after a 2-L fluid challenge. During surgery, PVP correlated highly to CVP (r = 0.86), and the bias (mean difference between CVP and PVP) was -1.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg (mean +/- SD). In the postanesthesia care unit, PVP also correlated highly to CVP (r = 0.88), and the bias was -2.2 +/- 1.9 (mean +/- SD). When adjusted by the average bias of -2, PVP predicted the observed CVP to within +/-3 mmHg in both populations of patients with 95% probability. In patients receiving a fluid challenge, PVP and CVP increased similarly from 6 +/- 2 to 11 +/- 2 mmHg and 4 +/- 2 to 9 +/- 2 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, PVP showed a consistent and high degree of agreement with CVP in the perioperative period in patients without significant cardiac dysfunction. PVP -2 was useful in predicting CVP over common clinical ranges of CVP. PVP is a rapid noninvasive tool to estimate volume status in surgical patients.     

Spurious central venous pressure

A patient is described in whom two different sites of cannulation of central veins produced markedly different pressures with potentially dangerous consequences. Falsely elevated pressures recorded from a catheter inserted via the subclavian vein were related to the patency in the arm of an arteriovenous shunt. The likely cause of this phenomenon is discussed.