A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Gefitinib With or Without Pemetrexed as First-line Treatment in Nonsquamous NSCLC With EGFR Mutation: Final Overall Survival and Biomarker Analysis

IntroductionClinical studies have shown that a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and pemetrexed overcame acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKI in NSCLC. Previously, pemetrexed+gefintib (P+G) had improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with gefitinib. We present OS, updated PFS, biomarker analysis, and safety of P+G versus gefitinib.MethodsThis was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized study conducted in East Asian patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR mutations. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive P+G (500 mg/m² intravenously 3-weekly + 250 mg/day orally) or gefitinib.ResultsIn total, 191 patients (P+G, n=126; gefitinib, n=65) comprised the intent-to-treat and safety populations. Median OS was 43.4 months in P+G versus 36.8 months in gefitinib arm; adjusted HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.5-1.2); one-sided P=0.105. Median PFS was significantly longer in the P+G (16.2 months) versus gefitinib arm (11.1 months); adjusted HR 0.67 (95% CI, 0.5-0.9); one-sided P=0.009. In the P+G and gefitinib arms, median PFS was 22.6 and 11.0 months, respectively, in patients with low thymidylate synthase (TS) expression, and 12.6 and 9.9 months, respectively, in patients with high TS expression. Common second-line post-discontinuation systemic therapies were EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy. Most patients experienced at least one adverse event.ConclusionsAddition of pemetrexed to EGFR TKI gefitinib resulted in significantly improved PFS and numerically longer OS compared with gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Low TS expression appeared to be a good predictor for treatment outcomes.     

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Tumor Proportion Score and Overall Survival From First-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Nonsquamous Versus Squamous NSCLC

IntroductionFor patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) has been validated as a predictive biomarker for improved overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, its histology-specific predictive value in patients with advanced squamous versus nonsquamous cancers remains unclear. To evaluate the differential value of PD-L1 TPS as a predictive biomarker for OS after first-line pembrolizumab in patients with squamous versus nonsquamous NSCLC.MethodsRetrospective, observational study of patients diagnosed with having advanced NSCLC who were treated between October 2015 and April 2019 at community oncology clinics and academic medical centers in a deidentified electronic health record–derived database. Included patients were diagnosed with having advanced or metastatic NSCLC, received treatment with first-line, single-agent pembrolizumab, and had documentation of PD-L1 testing with a numeric result. Exclusion criteria included alterations in EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. The primary end point was OS from start of first-line pembrolizumab therapy by squamous or nonsquamous histology and PD-1 expression level measured by TPS (low, <50% or high, ≥50%).ResultsThe cohort of 1460 patients with NSCLC who received pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy had a mean age of 72 years. Histology was 28% squamous and 72% nonsquamous. PD-L1 expression was low in 13% and high in 87%. No meaningful differences in age, sex, or smoking history were observed by PD-L1 TPS or histology type. A generalized gamma model adjusting for sex and stage at diagnosis found that for patients with nonsquamous histology, high PD-L1 TPS was significantly associated with improved OS by a median OS difference of 8.4 months (p < 0.001). In contrast, for patients with squamous histology, there was no evidence of association between PD-L1 expression level and OS (p = 0.283). PD-L1–related incremental differences in median OS between the patients with squamous and nonsquamous tumors were significantly different (p = 0.034).ConclusionsAmong patients with NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab, high PD-L1 TPS is associated with OS among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, but not among patients with squamous NSCLC.     

Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Beyond 5 Years of NSCLC Patients With Synchronous Oligometastases Treated in a Prospective Phase II Trial (NCT 01282450)

Introduction

Two randomized studies have shown an increased progression-free survival (PFS) by adding a radical local treatment to systemic therapy in responding patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, but long-term data are lacking. We updated the results of our previous phase II trial with a minimal follow-up exceeding 7 years.

Mocetinostat in Combination With Durvalumab for Patients With Advanced NSCLC: Results From a Phase I/II Study

BackgroundHistone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have potential to augment the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors and overcome treatment resistance. This dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT02805660) investigated mocetinostat (class I/IV HDAC inhibitor) plus durvalumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across cohorts defined by tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and prior experience with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) or anti-PD-L1 regimens.Patients and MethodsSequential cohorts of patients with solid tumors received mocetinostat (starting dose: 50 mg TIW) plus durvalumab at a standard dose (1500 mg Q4W) to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D: phase I primary endpoint), based on the observed safety profile. RP2D was administered to patients with advanced NSCLC across 4 cohorts grouped by tumor PD-L1 expression (none or low/high) and prior experience with anti-PD-L1 /anti-PD-1 agents (naïve, clinical benefit: yes/no). The phase II primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1).ResultsEighty-three patients were enrolled (phase I [n = 20], phase II [n = 63]). RP2D was mocetinostat 70 mg TIW plus durvalumab. ORR was 11.5% across the phase II cohorts, and responses were durable (median 329 days). Clinical activity was observed in NSCLC patients with disease refractory to prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment: ORR 23.1%. Across all patients, fatigue (41%), nausea (40%), and diarrhea (31%) were the most frequent treatment-related adverse events.ConclusionMocetinostat 70 mg TIW plus durvalumab at the standard dose was generally well tolerated. Clinical activity was observed in patients with NSCLC unresponsive to prior anti-PD­(L)1 therapy.     

Atezolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Pretreated Patients With NSCLC: Final Results From the Randomized Phase 2 POPLAR and Phase 3 OAK Clinical Trials

IntroductionThe phase 2 POPLAR and phase 3 OAK studies of the anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy atezolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC revealed significant improvements in survival versus docetaxel (p = 0.04 and 0.0003, respectively). Longer follow-up permits evaluation of continued benefit of atezolizumab. This study reports the final overall survival (OS) and safety findings from both trials.MethodsPOPLAR randomized 287 patients (atezolizumab, 144; docetaxel, 143) and OAK randomized 1225 patients (atezolizumab, 613; docetaxel, 612). The patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg fixed dose) or docetaxel (75 mg/m²) every 3 weeks. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated.ResultsA longer OS was observed in patients receiving atezolizumab versus docetaxel in POPLAR (median OS = 12.6 mo versus 9.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–1.00) and OAK (median OS = 13.3 versus 9.8 mo; hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68–0.89). The 4-year OS rates in POPLAR were 14.8% (8.7–20.8) and 8.1% (3.2–13.0) and those in OAK were 15.5% (12.4–18.7) and 8.7% (6.2–11.3) for atezolizumab and docetaxel, respectively. Atezolizumab had improved OS benefit compared with docetaxel across all PD-L1 expression and histology groups. Most 4-year survivors in the docetaxel arms received subsequent immunotherapy (POPLAR, 50%; OAK, 65%). Of the 4-year survivors, most had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 and nonsquamous histological classification and approximately half were responders (POPLAR: atezolizumab, seven of 15; docetaxel, three of four; OAK: atezolizumab, 24 of 43; docetaxel, 11 of 26). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 27% and 16% of atezolizumab 4-year survivors in POPLAR and OAK, respectively.ConclusionsLong-term follow-up suggests a consistent survival benefit with atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression, histology, or subsequent immunotherapy. Atezolizumab had no new safety signals, and the safety profile was similar to that in previous studies.     

NEPTUNE: Phase 3 Study of First-Line Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC

IntroductionNEPTUNE, a phase 3, open-label study, evaluated first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC).MethodsEligible patients with EGFR and ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomized (1:1) to first-line durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks until progression) plus tremelimumab (1 mg/kg every 4 weeks for up to four doses) or standard chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression (≥25% versus <25%), tumor histologic type, and smoking history. The amended primary end point was overall survival (OS) in patients with blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) greater than or equal to 20 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb and safety and tolerability in all treated patients.ResultsAs of June 24, 2019, 823 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT]); 512 (62%) were bTMB-evaluable, with 129 of 512 (25%) having bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb (durvalumab plus tremelimumab [n = 69]; chemotherapy [n = 60]). Baseline characteristics were balanced in the intention-to-treat. Among patients with bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb, OS improvement with durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.71 [95% confidence interval: 0.49–1.05; p = 0.081]; median OS, 11.7 versus 9.1 months); the hazard ratio for PFS was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.51–1.15; median PFS, 4.2 versus 5.1 months). In the overall safety population, incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 20.7% (durvalumab plus tremelimumab) and 33.6% (chemotherapy).ConclusionsNEPTUNE did not meet its primary end point of improved OS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC and bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb. Despite the amended study design, with a resultant small primary analysis population, therapeutic activity was aligned with expectations based on mechanistic biology and previous studies.     

Safety,Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in Patients With Advanced NSCLC With EGFR T790M Mutation: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation and Dose-Expansion Study

IntroductionRezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for EGFR-sensitizing and T790M mutations. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of rezivertinib for patients having advanced NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation.MethodsThis phase 1 study (NCT03386955) was conducted across 20 sites in the People's Republic of China. Patients received rezivertinib at six oral dose levels (30 mg, 60 mg, 120 mg, 180 mg, 240 mg, 300 mg) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary end points were safety for the dose-escalation phase and objective response rate by the blinded independent central review for the total study population.ResultsA total of 19 patients in dose-escalation phase using the standard 3 + 3 design principle and 153 patients in dose-expansion phase were enrolled from September 11, 2017, to August 23, 2019. The data cutoff date was on June 15, 2020. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the dose-escalation phase. The treatment-related adverse events were observed in 82.0% (141 of 172) of patients, and 17.4% (30 of 172) had grade greater than or equal to 3, among which decreased neutrophil count (2.9%), leukopenia (2.9%), and pneumonia (2.9%) were the most common. The overall blinded independent central review–evaluated objective response rate was 59.3% (102 of 172, 95% confidence interval: 51.6–66.7), and the median progression-free survival was 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 8.3–11.1) months.ConclusionsRezivertinib was found to have promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC. Further study is warranted.     

Progression-Free and Overall Survival for Concurrent Nivolumab With Standard Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Stage IIIA-B NSCLC: Results From the European Thoracic Oncology Platform NICOLAS Phase II Trial (European Thoracic Oncology Platform 6-14)

IntroductionThe NICOLAS study is the first completed single-arm phase II trial in stage III NSCLC evaluating hierarchically first the safety and then the efficacy of adding nivolumab concurrently to standard definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The safety end point was reported earlier; here, we present the efficacy results.MethodsStage IIIA-B unresectable treatment-naive patients with NSCLC received three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy (66 Gy, 33 fractions), along with nivolumab (360 mg, 3-weekly). Nivolumab was continued as monotherapy consolidation for a maximum of 1 year (480 mg, 4-weekly). The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), with a target improvement compared with historical data of at least 15%, from 45% to 60%. To test this efficacy hypothesis, a sample size of 74 assessable patients provided a power of 83% with a one-sided alpha of 5%.ResultsA total of 79 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 21.0 months (interquartile range: 15.8–25.8 mo) for the primary PFS analysis. A total of 35.4% of the patients had stage IIIA, and 63.3% had stage IIIB disease. The 1-year PFS was 53.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.0%–64.0%) and the median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 10.1–22.8 mo). Because 37 PFS events occurred in the first year posttreatment among the first 74 assessable patients, a 1-year PFS rate of at least 45% could not be rejected (p = 0.23). At an extended follow-up (median 32.6 mo), 37 deaths have been recorded, with a median overall survival (OS) of 38.8 months (95% CI: 26.8 mo–not estimable) and a 2-year OS rate of 63.7% (95% CI: 51.9%–73.4%). The OS of patients with stage IIIA disease was found to be significantly higher than patients with stage IIIB disease, with a 2-year OS of 81% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.037).ConclusionsPFS and OS are arithmetically higher in studies involving the same population. However, on the basis of the formal hierarchical efficacy analysis, we could not reject that the 1-year PFS rate is at least 45%.     

Osimertinib Improves Overall Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Leptomeningeal Metastases Regardless of T790M Mutational Status

IntroductionOsimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, efficiently penetrates the blood-brain barrier. This study explored whether treatment with osimertinib leads to improved overall survival (OS) for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) compared with those not treated with osimertinib.MethodsFrom October 2008 to October 2019, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and cytologically confirmed LM were retrospectively analyzed for OS according to osimertinib treatment and T790M mutational status. The OS was defined as the time from the diagnosis of LM to death.ResultsFor the 351 patients with LM included in the analysis, the median OS (mOS) was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.2–9.0). T790M mutation was detected in 88 of 197 patients tested, and a total of 110 patients were treated with osimertinib after LM. No difference in mOS according to T790M mutational status (10.1 mo [95% CI: 4.31–15.82] versus 9.0 [95% CI: 6.81–11.21], p = 0.936) was found. Nevertheless, patients treated with osimertinib had a superior OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 15.13–18.94) compared with those not treated with osimertinib who had a mOS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.34–6.63), regardless of T790M mutational status (hazard ratio: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.28–0.47], p < 0.001). This was also considerably longer even than the mOS of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.01–10.39) of those who were never treated with osimertinib but had first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.ConclusionsOsimertinib is a promising treatment option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM regardless of T790M mutational status.     

Efficacy and Safety of Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic/Recurrent EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC: A Phase 2b Study

IntroductionRezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both EGFR-sensitizing mutations and EGFR T790M mutation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC.MethodsPatients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC with confirmed EGFR T790M mutation who progressed after first-/second-generation EGFR TKI therapy or primary EGFR T790M mutation were enrolled. Patients received rezivertinib at 180 mg orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03812809).ResultsA total of 226 patients were enrolled from July 5, 2019, to January 22, 2020. By the data cutoff date on January 24, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 23.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.8–24.0). The ORR by blinded independent central review was 64.6% (95% CI: 58.0%–70.8%), and DCR was 89.8% (95% CI: 85.1%–93.4%). The median duration of response was 12.5 months (95% CI: 10.0–13.9), and median PFS was 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.6–13.9). The median overall survival was 23.9 months (95% CI: 20.0–not calculated [NC]). Among 91 (40.3%) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the median CNS PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.1–NC). In 29 patients with more than or equal to one brain target lesion at baseline, the CNS ORR and CNS DCR were 69.0% (95% CI: 49.2%–84.7%) and 100% (95% CI: 88.1%–100%), respectively. Time to progression of CNS was 16.5 months (95% CI: 9.7–NC). Of 226 patients, 188 (83.2%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event, whereas grade more than or equal to 3 occurred in 45 (19.9%) patients. No interstitial lung disease was reported.ConclusionsRezivertinib was found to have promising efficacy and favorable safety profile for patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation.     

Phase II Trial of Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With Docetaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of Overall Survival

BackgroundA randomized phase II study in first-line MBC demonstrated superior efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel. Final survival analyses and updated safety results are reported.Patients and MethodsThree hundred two patients with no previous chemotherapy for MBC were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m² q3w, nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² or 150 mg/m² the first 3 of 4 weeks (qw 3/4), or docetaxel 100 mg/m² q3w. The trial was powered for analyses of antitumor activity and safety.ResultsTreatment with nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m² qw 3/4 resulted in a median overall survival (OS) of 33.8 months compared with 22.2, 27.7, and 26.6 months for nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² qw 3/4, nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m² q3w, and docetaxel, respectively (overall P = .047). Patients receiving 150 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel had prolonged median OS compared with those in the 100 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel arm (hazard ratio, 0.575; P = .008). A trend toward a longer OS was noted in the 150 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel arm versus docetaxel arm (hazard ratio, 0.688). Grade 3 or 4 fatigue, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia were less frequent in all nab-paclitaxel arms compared with docetaxel.ConclusionsConsistent with previously published efficacy results, these data suggest that 150 mg/m² qw 3/4 may represent the most clinically efficacious nab-paclitaxel dosing regimen for patients with no previous chemotherapy for MBC. A phase III trial confirming these results would be necessary and prudent before widespread adoption of the 150 mg/m² dose in clinical practice.     

Detection of ALK and KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC With Disease Progression During Crizotinib Treatment

BackgroundIn patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disease progression occurs after a median of 9 to 10 months of crizotinib treatment. Several mechanisms of resistance have been identified and include ALK mutations and amplification or the activation of bypassing signaling pathways. Rebiopsy in NSCLC patients represents a critical issue and the analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has a promising role for the identification of resistance mechanisms.Patients and MethodsTwenty patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were enrolled after disease progression during crizotinib treatment; cfDNA was analyzed using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (BioRad, Hercules, CA) for ALK (p.L1196M, p.G1269A, and p.F1174L) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) (codons 12 and 13) mutations.ResultsALK secondary mutations (p.L1196M, p.G1269A, and p.F1174L) were identified in 5 patients; 1 patient had 2 ALK mutations (p.L1196M and p.G1269A). Overall, 10 patients presented KRAS mutations (7 p.G12D, 2 p.G12V, and 1 p.G12C mutations, respectively). In 3 patients KRAS mutations were associated with ALK mutations. cfDNA was monitored during the treatment with second-generation ALK inhibitors and the amount of ALK as well as KRAS mutations decreased along with tumor regression.ConclusionALK and KRAS mutations are associated with acquired resistance to crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. In particular, ALK acquired mutations can be detected in plasma and could represent a promising tumor marker for response monitoring.     

Atezolizumab Treatment Beyond Progression in Advanced NSCLC: Results From the Randomized,Phase III OAK Study

Introduction

Cancer immunotherapy may alter tumor biology such that treatment effects can extend beyond radiographic progression. In the randomized, phase III OAK study of atezolizumab (anti–programmed death-ligand 1) versus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC, overall survival (OS) benefit with atezolizumab was observed in the overall patient population, without improvement in objective response rate (ORR) or progression-free survival (PFS). We examine the benefit-risk of atezolizumab treatment beyond progression (TBP).

紫杉醇脂质体治疗非小细胞肺癌40例近期疗效及安全性分析

目的比较国产紫杉醇脂质体与紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。方法病理诊断明确的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机进入试验组和对照组。试验组每周期予以紫杉醇脂质体135 mg/m2,对照组每周期予以紫杉醇135 mg/m2。两组每周期均联合顺铂75 mg/m2,每三周为一周期,两周期后评价疗效及安全性。结果82例患者进入该研究。试验组40例,对照组42例。其中81例患者可评价疗效和不良反应。试验组总有效率27.5％,对照组总有效率24.4％,两组有效率差异无统计学意义。两组血液学毒性发生率差异无统计学意义。但周围神经病变及聚氧乙基代蓖麻油与无水乙醇的混合溶媒所产生的相关毒性,试验组发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论紫杉醇脂质体联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效与紫杉醇相当,但过敏反应和周围神经病变的发生率明显降低。     

Safety but Limited Efficacy of Ensartinib in ROS1-Positive NSCLC: A Single-Arm,Multicenter Phase 2 Study

IntroductionSome ALK inhibitors with good inhibition of ROS1 in preclinical studies have been reported to be possibly beneficial in ROS1-positive NSCLC. In this work, we studied the efficacy and safety of ensartinib in the treatment of patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC.MethodsThe exploratory study was a phase 2, single-arm, multicenter design (NCT03608007). Patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC with a previous chemotherapy line number of less than or equal to 1 who received ensartinib at the dose of 225 mg once daily were enrolled. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by an investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsFrom June 2018 to July 2019, a total of 59 patients were enrolled at 23 centers in the People’s Republic of China. At the time of data cutoff, the median follow-up was 19.8 months (range: 0.8–22.5). The median objective response rate was 27.0 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 13.8–44.1) with 10 partial responses. Median duration of response was 4.8 months (95 % CI: 1.8–10.8). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95 % CI: 4.0–6.4). The median overall survival was not estimable (95 % CI: 14.9–not estimable). Of four patients with brain metastases, intracranial disease control was reported in three (75.0 %, 95 % CI: 19.4–99.4). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash and liver enzyme abnormalities, with good prognosis after adjustment for dosage and concomitant medication. Most of the TRAEs were of grades 1 to 2, and incidence of grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs was 25.4 %.ConclusionsEnsartinib had a modest efficacy in patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC with an acceptable safety profile.