UGT1A1*28 polymorphism predicts irinotecan-induced severe toxicities without affecting treatment outcome and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: It is known that the uridine-diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1)*28 polymorphism reduces UGT1A1 enzyme activity, which may lead to severe toxicities in patients who receive irinotecan. This study was conducted to assess the influence of this polymorphism on the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). METHODS: In total, 128 patients with metastatic CRC who had received previous treatment with irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin were analyzed retrospectively. Genomic DNA samples were obtained from patients' leukocytes, and genotypes were determined by analyzing the sequence of TATA boxes in the UGT1A1 gene. The influence of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on toxicity and treatment outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Approximately 20% of patients were identified with the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, including 15.6% (n = 20 patients) with the thymine-adenine (TA)6/TA7 genotype and 4.7% (n = 6 patients) with the TA7/TA7 genotype. The remaining 79.7% of patients (n = 102) had wild type TA6/TA6. Marked increases in grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (53.8% vs 4.9%; P < .01), neutropenic fever (38.5% vs 3.9%; P < .01), diarrhea (26.9% vs 5.9%; P < .01), and pretreatment bilirubin level (23.1% vs 8.8%; P = .04) were observed in patients who had the TA6/TA7 or TA7/TA7 genotypes. Patients' pretreatment bilirubin levels correlated well with irinotecan-induced neutropenia (P < .01). It was noted that, although the requirement for irinotecan dose reduction was significantly greater in patients who had this genetic variant (42.3% vs 12.7%; P < .01), it did not affect the response rate to irinotecan-based chemotherapy (42.3% vs 45.1%; P = .80), and it did not significantly affect progression-free survival (10 months vs 11 months; P = .94) or overall survival (19 months vs 18 months; P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggested that the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism may be a key determinant for predicting irinotecan-induced severe toxicities without affecting treatment outcome for patients with metastatic CRC. Further prospective studies are warranted for using this polymorphism to optimize irinotecan-based chemotherapy.     

UGT1A1基因多态性在FOLFIRI方案二线治疗转移性结直肠癌中的临床意义

目的 探讨尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶（UGT）1A1基因多态性在FOLFIRI方案二线治疗转移性结直肠癌（mCRC）中的安全性和作为疗效预测指标的价值。方法在FOLFIRI方案化疗前分离mCRC患者外周血中单核细胞,采用荧光定量PCR-HRM法测定UGT1A1基因型。根据NCI CTC 3.0和RECIST 10标准分别评价化疗的不良反应和疗效,并分析UGT1A1基因多态性与不良反应和近期有效率（RR）的关系。用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,Log-rank 检验分析UGT1A1基因型对无进展生存期（PFS）的影响。结果38例患者中,UGT1A1*28位点的野生型（TA6／6）有31例（81.6％）,杂合突变型（TA6／7）2例（5.3％）,纯合突变型（TA7／7）5例（13.2％）;UGT1A1*6位点的野生型（G／G）有28例（73.7％）,杂合突变型（G／A）8例（21.1％）,纯合突变型（A／A）2例（5.3％）。在3～4级延迟性腹泻和中性粒细胞减少的发生率方面,UGT1A1*28的野生型（TA6／6）显著低于TA6／7和TA7／7基因型（P＜0.05）,UGT1A1*6的野生型（G／G）也显著低于G／A和A／A基因型（P＜0.05）。RR和PFS在UGT1A1各种基因型之间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 在FOLFIRI方案二线治疗mCRC中,UGT1A1*28位点和UGT1A1*6位点突变可以作为严重的延迟性腹泻和中性粒细胞减少的预测指标,但UGT1A1基因多态性与疗效无关。     

Sequential Targeted Therapy After Pazopanib Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Efficacy and Toxicity

Introduction/BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in whom first-line therapies have failed might derive clinical benefit with sequential targeted agents. Limited data are available on the efficacy and toxicity of subsequent therapies after disease progression during pazopanib therapy.Patients and MethodsPatients with mRCC who received subsequent systemic treatment after pazopanib treatment failure were identified across 7 institutions. Pazopanib was given as first-line therapy in 28 patients and after cytokines therapy in 7 patients. Clinical outcome and toxicity analyses of 2 sequential treatment options (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor [mTORi]) is presented.ResultsSubsequent therapy was anti-VEGF in 22 patients and mTORi in 13. One patient who received bevacizumab and temsirolimus combination was excluded. VEGF-targeted therapies included sorafenib (n = 10), sunitinib (n = 3), bevacizumab (n = 2), cediranib (n = 4) and cabozantinib (n = 3). Patients treated with mTORi received everolimus. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months from the start of subsequent therapy with anti-VEGF and 2.4 months with mTORi (P = .009). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (P = .68). Clinical benefit (including partial response and stable disease) on subsequent therapy was observed in 15 patients (64%) and 4 patients (31%) of anti–VEGF- and everolimus-treated patients, respectively (P = .021).ConclusionIn this retrospective study, targeting VEGF was an effective strategy after disease progression during pazopanib treatment, although OS was not different among patients treated with VEGF or mTORi.     

Phase II study of a triplet regimen of S-1 combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: clinical and pharmacogenetic results

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (TIROX) in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) and the association between treatment outcome and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A polymorphisms.Patients and methodsPatients with previously untreated MGC received S-1 40 mg/m² b.i.d. on days 1–14 and irinotecan 150 mg/m² plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks.ResultsForty-four patients were enrolled. In intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 75%, including the complete response (CR) rate of 14%. The median time to progression and overall survival was 10.2 and 17.6 months, respectively. Ten (26%) of the 39 patients with primary gastric tumor showed biopsy-confirmed gastric CR. Grade 3/4 neutropenia developed in 66% of patients and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 16%. The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxic effects were abdominal pain (18%), anorexia (16%), and diarrhea (14%). UGT1A polymorphisms were associated with significantly higher incidence of grade 4 leukopenia (UGT1A1*6), neutropenia (UGT1A1*6, UGT1A6*2, and UGT1A7*3), grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (UGT1A1*6), and grade 3 abdominal pain (UGT1A1*6).ConclusionsThe TIROX regimen induced marked tumor reduction and promising survival with a manageable toxicity profile in MGC patients. UGT1A genotype may be predictive of TIROX toxicity.     

川东北地区人群结直肠癌患者UGT1A1*28基因多态性与伊立替康所致毒副反应的相关性

目的:观察结直肠癌患者UGT1A1*28基因多态性的分布频率,了解UGT1A1*28基因多态性与结直肠癌患者应用伊立替康联合5-氟尿嘧啶化疗毒副反应的相关性。方法:从384例接受伊立替康联合氟尿嘧啶一线化疗的晚期结直肠癌病例中采外周血提取DNA。采用PCR 法扩增目的基因片段,直接测序法分析UGT1A1*28基因多态性。临床观察并评价患者化疗毒副反应分级,统计分析UGT1A1*28基因表型与化疗毒副反应相关性。结果:全部 384例患者 UGT1A1*28基因多态性分布情况:TA6/6野生基因型287例(74.7％),TA6/7杂合基因型73例（19.0％）,TA7/7纯合基因型24例（6.3％）。化疗毒副反应和UGT1A1*28基因多态性进行临床单因素分析显示UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7、杂合型TA6/7与3-4度白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、腹泻、胆红素升高具有明显相关性（P<0.01）,UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7及杂合型TA6/7患者发生中性粒细胞减少的风险较UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6患者高5.625倍（OR=5.625）。UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7和UGT1A1*28基因杂合型TA6/7患者发生腹泻的风险较UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6患者高6.778倍（OR=6.778）。结论:UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7及杂合型TA6/7患者应用伊立替康化疗后发生重度中性粒细胞减少、重度腹泻的风险高于UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6,为临床伊立替康用药选择、剂量调整、毒副反应的提前干预提供理论依据。     

UGT1A1*6, 1A7*3, and 1A9*22 genotypes predict severe neutropenia in FOLFIRI‐treated metastatic colorectal cancer in two prospective studies in Japan

Retrospective studies have suggested that UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 predict severe toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan‐containing regimens. We prospectively evaluated the impact of UGT1A genotypes and haplotypes on severe toxicity and efficacy in patients treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan combination chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the two prospective multicenter phase II studies in Japan. The FLIGHT1 study was a first‐line FOLFIRI trial, and FLIGHT2 was a FOLFOX‐refractory, second‐line FOLFIRI trial. A total of 73 patients agreed to additional analysis, and were genotyped for UGT1A polymorphisms, UGT1A1*28 (TA6>TA7), UGT1A1*6 (211G>A), UGT1A1*27 (686C>A), UGT1A1*60 (?3279T>G), UGT1A1*93 (?3156G>A), UGT1A7 (?57T>G), UGT1A7*3 (387T>G, 622T>C), and UGT1A9*22 (T9>T10). Of 73 patients, 34 developed G3/4 severe hematological toxicities. The toxicities were significantly more frequent in patients with UGT1A1*6 (211A), UGT1A7 (387G), and UGT1A9*22 reference alleles (T9). Haplotype I, which consists of all favorable alleles, was associated with a significant reduction in hematologic toxicity (P = 0.031). In contrast, haplotype II, which contains four high‐risk alleles, showed significantly higher hematologic toxicity than the other haplotypes (P = 0.010). Six out of seven patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 or *6 experienced severe hematological toxicity despite the fact that their response rate was not impaired (42.9%). We concluded that UGT1A polymorphisms, especially UGT1A1*6, are important for the prediction of severe toxicity of FOLFIRI in northeast Asian populations. In this regard, haplotype analyses should substantially impact the prediction of severe hematological toxicities of FOLFIRI. (Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000002388 and UMIN000002476).     

中国人尿苷二磷酸葡糖苷酸转移酶1A基因多态性与伊立替康毒性的相关性

目的评价伊立替康(CVT-11)联合5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)和亚叶酸钙(LV)治疗晚期大肠癌的毒性与尿苷二磷酸葡糖苷酸转移酶1A(UGT1A)基因多态性的相关性。方法收集70例晚期大肠癌患者及健康志愿者的外周血,提取基因组DNA,PCR法扩增目的基因片段,直接测序法分析UGT1A基因多态性,并与毒性进行相关性分析。结果70例晚期大肠癌患者的3～4度中性粒细胞减少发生率为20.O%(14/70);2～4度迟发性腹泻发生率为22.9%(16/70),其中3-4度迟发性腹泻率仅为5.7%(4/70)。UGT1A1*28的野生基因型TA6/6患者的2-4度迟发性腹泻发生率为15.7%,低于TA6/7和TA7/7基因型的患者(P=0.027)。健康人群和大肠癌患者UGT1A基因家族中各个基因多态性的分布无差别。结论UGT1A1*28的野生基因型TA6/6在中国人中分布频率较高,这也是CPT-11为主方案治疗晚期大肠癌发生严重迟发性腹泻较少的原因。     

UGT1A1 polymorphism can predict hematologic toxicity in patients treated with irinotecan.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is approved in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and can cause severe toxicity. The main purpose of our study was to assess the role of different polymorphisms on the occurrence of hematologic toxicities and disease-free survival in high-risk stage III colon cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and CPT-11 adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in a prospective randomized trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Four hundred patients were randomized in a phase III trial comparing LV5FU2 to LV5FU2 + CPT-11. DNA from 184 patients was extracted and genotyped to detect nucleotide polymorphism: 3435C>T for ABCB1, 6986A>G for CYP3A5, UGT1A1*28 and -3156G>A for UGT1A1. RESULTS: Genotype frequencies were similar in both treatment arms. In the test arm, no significant difference was observed in toxicity or disease-free survival for ABCB1 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms. UGT1A1*28 homozygous patients showed more frequent severe hematologic toxicity (50%) than UGT1A1*1 homozygous patients (16.2%), P = 0.06. Moreover, patients homozygous for the mutant allele of -3156G>A UGT1A1 polymorphism showed more frequent severe hematologic toxicity (50%) than patients homozygous for wild-type allele (12.5%), P = 0.01. This toxicity occurred significantly earlier in homozygous mutant than wild-type homozygous patients (P = 0.043). In a Cox model, the hazard ratio for severe hematologic toxicity is significantly higher for patients with the A/A compared with the G/G genotype [hazard ratio, 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-37.2; P = 0.005]. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the clinical utility of identification of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphisms before LV5FU2 + CPT-11 treatment to predict early hematologic toxicity. The -3156G>A polymorphism seems to be a better predictor than the UGT1A1 (TA)(6)TAA>(TA)(7)TAA polymorphism.     

A randomised,double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final overall survival results and safety update

BackgroundIn this randomised phase III study (VEG105192; NCT00334282), pazopanib previously demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final overall survival (OS) and updated safety results are now reported.MethodsTreatment-naive or cytokine-pretreated mRCC patients (n = 435) stratified and randomised (2:1) to pazopanib 800 mg daily or placebo, were treated until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. Upon progression, placebo patients could receive pazopanib through an open-label study. Final OS in the intent-to-treat population was analysed using a stratified log-rank test. Rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) and inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) analyses were performed post-hoc to adjust for crossover.FindingsThe difference in final OS between pazopanib- and placebo-treated patients was not statistically significant (22.9 versus 20.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–1.16; one-sided P = .224). Early and frequent crossover from placebo to pazopanib and prolonged duration of crossover treatment confounded the OS analysis. In IPCW analyses, pazopanib decreased mortality (HR = 0.504; 95% CI, 0.315–0.762; two-sided P = .002). Similar, albeit non-significant, results were obtained in RPSFT analyses (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.215–1.388; two-sided P = .172). Since the last cutoff, cumulative exposure to pazopanib increased by 30%. The pazopanib safety profile showed no new safety signals or changes in the type, frequency and severity of adverse events.InterpretationAlthough no significant difference in OS was observed in this study, extensive crossover from placebo to pazopanib confounded final OS analysis. Post-hoc analyses adjusting for crossover suggest OS benefit with pazopanib treatment for mRCC patients.     

Validation of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model for first-line pazopanib in metastatic renal carcinoma: the Spanish Oncologic Genitourinary Group (SOGUG) SPAZO study

BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line pazopanib were not included in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model. SPAZO (NCT02282579) was a nation-wide retrospective observational study designed to assess the effectiveness and validate the IMDC prognostic model in patients treated with first-line pazopanib in clinical practice.Patients and methodsData of 278 patients, treated with first-line pazopanib for mRCC in 34 centres in Spain, were locally recorded and externally validated. Mean age was 66 years, there were 68.3% male, 93.5% clear-cell type, 74.8% nephrectomized, and 81.3% had ECOG 0-1. Metastatic sites were: lung 70.9%, lymph node 43.9%, bone 26.3%, soft tissue/skin 20.1%, liver 15.1%, CNS 7.2%, adrenal gland 6.5%, pleura/peritoneum 5.8%, pancreas 5%, and kidney 2.2%. After median follow-up of 23 months, 76.4% had discontinued pazopanib (57.2% due to progression), 47.9% had received second-line targeted therapy, and 48.9% had died.ResultsAccording to IMDC prognostic model, 19.4% had favourable risk (FR), 57.2% intermediate risk (IR), and 23.4% poor risk (PR). No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Response rate was 30.3% (FR: 44%, IR: 30% PR: 17.3%). Median progression-free survival (whole population) was 11 months (32 in FR, 11 in IR, 4 in PR). Median and 2-year overall survival (whole population) were 22 months and 48.1%, respectively (FR: not reached and 81.6%, IR: 22 and 48.7%, PR: 7 and 18.8%). These estimations and their 95% confidence intervals are fully consistent with the outcomes predicted by the IMDC prognostic model.ConclusionOur results validate the IMDC model for first-line pazopanib in mRCC and confirm the effectiveness and safety of this treatment.     

UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康临床用药安全性及疗效的关系

目的：研究 UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康治疗结直肠癌患者的不良反应及疗效之间的关系。方法：自外周血中抽提基因组 DNA,进行 PCR 扩增,应用直接测序法分析2012年3月至2013年3月,于我院行基因检测的65例结直肠癌患者 UGT1A1*28和 UGT1A1*6基因多态性的分布情况。并对这65例应用含伊立替康方案化疗的患者出现的不良反应及化疗疗效,进行观察记录,比较不同基因型间的差异。结果：65例患者中,UGT1A1*28野生型 TA6／6有49例（75．4％）,杂合突变型 TA6／7有14例（21．5％）,纯合突变型TA7／7有2例（3．1％）。UGT1A1*6野生型 G／G 有47例（72．3％）,杂合突变型 G／A 有15例（23．1％）,纯合突变型 A ／A 有3例（4．6％）。在以上65例结直肠癌患者中,UGT1A1基因启动子区28位点,TA6／6、TA6／7和TA7／7型,发生3级以上腹泻者分别为8．2％、37．5％;发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少者分别为28．6％、62．5％。UGT1A1基因启动子区6位点,G／G、G／A 和 A ／A 型,发生3级以上腹泻者分别为12．8％、44．4％;发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少者分别为14．9％、22．2％。各组之间疗效无统计学差异。结论：患者 UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6多态性分布基本一致,UGT1A1*28突变型可以使应用含伊立替康化疗患者发生3级以上腹泻和中性粒细胞减少的风险增加。UGT1A1*6突变型可增加3级以上腹泻的发生风险。因此,UGT1A1基因型的检测对伊立替康相关的不良反应有一定的预测作用,可提高用药安全性,在临床用药中起到了指导作用。     

Assessing Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for First-Line Therapy in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-Life Data From a Single United Kingdom Institution

BackgroundElderly metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients are under-represented in clinical trials, whose results are therefore difficult to translate into routine management of older patients. We aimed at exploring treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in our real-life elderly mRCC cohort receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment data of elderly (≥ 70 years old at first-line start) mRCC patients starting either pazopanib or sunitinib as first-line treatment in our institution between March 2012 and April 2018. Baseline characteristics included age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).ResultsIn total, the records of 35 elderly mRCC patients were identified and retrospectively analyzed. Overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 20%, 9.7 months, and 21.6 months, respectively. Karnofsky performance status ≤ 70%, sarcomatoid features, absolute neutrophil count greater than upper limit of normal, and treatment-related Grade 3 arterial hypertension were independently associated with survival after multivariate analysis. Age-adjusted CCI was significantly associated with survival in univariate analysis only. The overall incidence of Grade 3 to 5 toxicities was 74%. Seven patients (20%) received early crossover to either sunitinib or pazopanib because of toxicity. Dose reduction was applied in 24 (73%) of the 33 patients who completed at least 1 cycle.ConclusionFirst-line TKI monotherapy provided clinical benefit in our elderly mRCC cohort. Relatively frequent dose reductions helped to maintain an acceptable tolerability profile. Further research is warranted to explore the significance of prognostic factors in elderly mRCC patients.     

UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康安全性和有效性的临床研究

  目的  观察57例应用伊立替康治疗进展期消化道肿瘤患者的安全性和有效性。  方法  采用全血基因组DNA提取、PCR法扩增目的基因片段, 直接测序法分析UGT1A1基因多态性, 检测2011年8月至2012年6月在河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科住院治疗的57例进展期消化道肿瘤患者应用伊立替康的情况, 观察并记录化疗中出现的不良反应以及疗效。  结果  57例进展期消化道肿瘤患者中, UGT1A1基因启动子区28位点, TA序列6次重复的纯合野生型TA6/6有43例（75.4%）; 基因型为TA序列6次和7次重复的杂合型TA6/7有13例（22.8%）; 基因型为TA序列7次重复的纯合突变型TA7/7有1例（1.8%）。UGT1A1基因启动子区6位点野生型G/G有48例（84.2%）, 杂合突变型G/A有7例（12.3%）, 纯合突变型A/A有2例（3.5%）。在57例采用含伊立替康方案化疗的进展期消化道肿瘤患者中, UGT1A1基因启动子区28位点, TA6/6、TA6/7和TA7/7野生型和突变型发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少者分别为7.0%、14.3%, 发生3级以上腹泻者分别为9.3%、14.3%, 其中纯合突变型仅1例患者, 100%的发生率。UGT1A1基因启动子区6位点, G/G、G/A和A/A野生型和突变型发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少者分别为4.2%、55.6%, 发生3级以上腹泻者分别为12.5%、44.4%, 具有统计学差异。各组之间疗效无统计学差异。  结论  患者UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6多态性分布基本一致, UGT1A1*6突变型患者应用伊立替康化疗发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少和腹泻的风险增加, 而UGT1A1*28突变型与以上不良反应并无绝对相关性, UGT1A1各基因型之间疗效无明显差异。能否通过对UGT1A1的筛查, 选择合适患者安全有效的应用伊立替康, 值得临床进一步扩大样本量深入研究。      

Associations between UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients

Purpose

Neutropenia is a life-threatening side effect of irinotecan, and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) gene polymorphisms are considered to be one of the predictive markers of irinotecan-related toxicities. Many studies have demonstrated that patients bearing UGT1A1*28 have a higher risk of severe neutropenia on toxicity of irinotecan. However, UGT1A1 (TA7/TA7) was very rare in Asian populations. Some researches reported that UGT1A1*28 and/or UGT1A1*6 could predict irinotecan-induced toxicities in Asian populations, but controversial conclusions still remained. This study aims to investigate the association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms *6, *6/*28 and irinotecan-related neutropenia in Asian cancer patients receiving irinotecan regimen chemotherapy.

Experimental design

Meta-analyses were done to assess the relationship between UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*6/*28 and irinotecan-induced neutropenia.

Results

The risk of neutropenia was significantly higher among patients with a UGT1A1*6 genotype than among those carrying the UGT1A1*1 allele(s) [odds ratio (OR) 3.276; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.887–5.688; P = 0.000 (*6/*6 vs. *1/*6 or *1/*1)], [OR 1.542; 95 % CI 1.180–2.041; P = 0.001 (*6/*6 or *1/*6 vs. *1/*1)]. Also, the risk was significantly higher among patients with a UGT1A1*6/*28 than among those carrying the UGT1A1*1 allele(s) [OR 3.275; 95 % CI 2.152–4.983; P = 0.000 (*6/*6 or *28/*28 or *6/*28 vs. *1/*6 or *1/*28 or *1/*1)].

Conclusions

In conclusion, the UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*6/*28 genotypes were associated with an increased risk of irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients.     

An indirect comparison of the toxicity of sunitinib and pazopanib in metastatic clear cell renal cancer

BackgroundBoth sunitinib and pazopanib are widely used as first line therapy in metastatic renal cancer (mRCC). The efficacy of these agents appears similar but they may have distinct toxicity profiles. In this study we compare the severity of symptomatic and asymptomatic toxicity associated with sunitinib and pazopanib.MethodsTwo sequential prospective single arm phase II studies investigated either 12 weeks of sunitinib (n = 43) or pazopanib (n = 34) prior to nephrectomy in untreated mRCC. Toxicity was defined as either symptomatic (hand and foot syndrome, mucositis, nausea, fatigue, diarrhoea, oedema, headache, pain, anorexia and change in taste) or asymptomatic (liver toxicity or haematological toxicity). Pazopanib (800 mg once daily (OD)) and sunitinib (50 mg 4/2) were given. Regular Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) toxicity assessment was performed during the first 12 weeks of therapy.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the overall number of toxic events (grade 1–4) for sunitinib and pazopanib (mean number of toxic events/patients: 1.97 versus 1.96: p > 0.05). Increased grade 2–4 symptomatic toxicity events occurred with sunitinib (hazard ratio (HR) 1.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–2.56] p < 0.03). Sunitinib was associated with an increased grade 2–4 mucositis (16% versus 0% p = 0.02) and fatigue (42% versus 15% p = 0.01). Pazopanib was associated with more frequent grade 1 diarrhoea (39% versus 12%: p = 0.03). Dose reductions for symptomatic toxicity occurred more frequently with sunitinib (26% versus 6% p < 0.05). There was no difference in the occurrence of asymptomatic toxicity.ConclusionThis indirect analysis suggests sunitinib and pazopanib have distinct toxicity profiles which may help guide patient’s choice. Further comparative data from randomised trials are awaited.     

UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康治疗结直肠癌不良反应的关系

背景与目的：尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶1A1(uridine diphosphoglucu-ronosyltransferase 1A1,UGTlA1)是伊立替康代谢关键酶,其活性受基因多态性影响显著。本研究探讨结直肠癌患者中,UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6基因多态性与伊立替康治疗相关不良反应之间的关系。方法：入组2013年4月—2013年12月于复旦大学附属中山医院肿瘤内科接受治疗的消化道恶性肿瘤患者160例。抽提外周血中基因组DNA,分别采用STR方法和Sanger测序法,检测UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6基因型,分析UGT1A1基因多态性分布情况。对其中82例化疗方案中含伊立替康的结直肠癌患者进行随访,记录不良反应发生情况和严重程度,比较不同基因型患者之间的差异。结果：160例消化道肿瘤患者中,UTG1A1*28(启动子TATA盒区域TA重复次数)野生型TA6/6124例(77.5%);杂合子TA6/7 33例(20.5%);纯合子TA7/7 3例(2.0%)。UGT1A1*6位点(211G>A)野生型GG 105例(65.6%),杂合子GA 48例(30.0%);纯合子AA 7例(4.4%)。82例化疗方案中含伊立替康的结直肠癌患者中,*28基因型(TA6/7和TA7/7)显著增加发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少的风险(58.3% vs 0.0%,P<0.001),并增加整体不良反应发生率(76.0% vs 45.6%,P<0.001);*6基因型(GA和AA)、年龄、性别、化疗方案和伊立替康相关不良反应发生无显著相关性。结论：接受伊立替康化疗的结直肠癌患者,UGT1A1*28位点多态性显著增加中性粒细胞减少发生的风险,可预测伊立替康引起的骨髓抑制性不良反应,辅助临床选择合适的化疗方案。     

Rapid and sensitive detection of UGT1A1 polymorphisms associated with irinotecan toxicity by a novel DNA microarray

Recent developments in the field of human genomics have greatly enhanced the potential for precision and personalized medicine. We have developed a novel DNA microarray, using a 3‐mm square chip coated with diamond‐like carbon to enhance the signal‐to‐background ratio, for use as an in vitro diagnostic tool in precision medicine. To verify the genotyping effectiveness of this newly developed DNA microarray we examined UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphisms in DNA extracted from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is established that the polymorphisms of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 are significantly associated with severe toxicity induced by the anti‐cancer drug irinotecan. For each sample, the results obtained with the novel microarray platform were compared with those obtained using other, more established, methods, including direct sequencing and the Invader assay. The polymorphisms tested included a single nucleotide substitution (UGT1A1*6) and a TA‐repeat polymorphism (UGT1A1*28), both of which were detected simultaneously and accurately using our method. Moreover, our method required 1.5‐fold less time to assay and 20‐fold less sample than those required by the Invader assay. In summary, our newly developed DNA microarray is more practical than established methods, and is at least as accurate; this will increase the efficiency of polymorphism detection prior to diagnosis and the commencement of treatment, and can feasibly be applied in precision medicine.     

UGT1A1 genotypes and glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan

Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is metabolized by esterase to form a SN-38, which is further conjugated by UGT1A1. Genetic polymorphism has been shown in a promoter region of UGT1A1 and is related to its activity. We investigated whether there might be an inter-individual difference in pharmacokinetics of SN-38 and its glucuronide, depending on the genotypes of UGT1A1.Patients and methods: Nine male patients with lung cancer were treated with irinotecan (50 mg/m²) and carboplatin. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with full sampling plasma data. Genotypes were determined by analyzing the sequence of TATA box of UGT1A1 of genomic DNA from the patients.Results: The genotyping analysis revealed one heterozygote (6/7) and one homozygote (7/7) for (TA)₇TAA allele (UGT1A1^*28). The remaining seven patients were homozygote for (TA)₆TAA allele (6/6, wild type). The metabolic ratios (SN-38/SN-38 glucuronide) in the patient with 7/7 genotype were uncharacteristically higher than those in the patients with other genotypes (6/6 and 6/7). Biliary index was 6980 versus 2180 ± 1110 (range 840–3730) in patients with 7/7 versus 6/6 genotypes, respectively.Conclusion: These results support the idea that the patient with 7/7 genotype has an impaired capacity for glucuronidation of SN-38.     

UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism increases risk of nilotinib-induced hyperbilirubinemia.

Nilotinib is a novel BCR-ABL inhibitor with significantly improved potency and selectivity over imatinib. In Phase I and Phase II clinical studies of nilotinib in patients with a variety of leukemias, infrequent instances of reversible, benign elevation of bilirubin were observed. Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) glucuronidates bilirubin in humans, and a polymorphism in the promoter of the gene that encodes it has been associated with hyperbilirubinemia during treatment with a number of drugs. Pharmacogenetic analysis of that TA-repeat polymorphism found an association between the (TA)7/(TA)7 genotype and risk of hyperbilirubinemia in Phase I patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or relapsed/refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); this result was replicated in two separate analyses of the chronic phase (CP) and accelerated phase (AP) CML arms of a Phase II study. As nilotinib is not known to be glucuronidated by UGT1A1, the combined impact of inhibition of UGT1A1 activity by nilotinib and genetic polymorphism is the most likely cause of the increased rate of hyperbilirubinemia.     

A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Initial Treatment Choice in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to the Immunotherapy Era: The MaRCC Registry Experience

IntroductionThe Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (MaRCC) Registry provides prospective data on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Methods and MaterialsPatients with mRCC and no prior systemic therapy were enrolled at academic and community sites. End of study data collection was in March 2019. Outcomes included overall survival (OS). A survey of treating physicians assessed reasons for treatment initiations and discontinuations.ResultsOverall, 376 patients with mRCC initiated first-line therapy; 171 (45.5%) received pazopanib, 75 (19.9%) sunitinib, and 74 (19.7%) participated in a clinical trial. Median (95% confidence interval) OS was longest in the clinical trial group (50.3 [35.8-not reached] months) versus pazopanib (39.0 [29.7-50.9] months) and sunitinib 26.2 [19.9-61.5] months). Non-clear cell RCC (21.5% of patients) was associated with worse median OS than clear cell RCC (18.0 vs. 47.3 months). Differences in baseline characteristics, treatment starting dose, and relative dose exposure among treatment groups suggest selection bias. Survey results revealed a de-emphasis on quality of life, toxicity, and patient preference compared with efficacy in treatment selection.ConclusionThe MaRCC Registry gives insights into real-world first-line treatment selection, outcomes, and physician rationale regarding initial treatment selection prior to the immunotherapy era. Differences in outcomes between clinical trial and off-study patients reflect the difficulty in translating trial results to real-world patients, and emphasize the need to broaden clinical trial eligibility. Physician emphasis on efficacy over quality of life and toxicity suggests more data and education are needed regarding these endpoints.