Treatment guidelines of metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG)

BackgroundSeveral guidelines dedicated to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Since 2013 no recent guidelines are specifically dedicated to older patients and based on a systematic review.Materials and methodsA multidisciplinary Task Force with digestive oncologists, geriatricians and methodologists from the SoFOG was formed in 2016 to update recommendations on medical treatment of mCRC based on a systematic review of publications from 2000 to 2018. Search strategy has followed a standardized protocol from the formulation of clinical questions and definition of a search algorithm to the selection of complete articles for recommendations.ResultsThe four selected key questions were: For which older patients with mCRC can we considered: (1) Any chemotherapy, (2) Mono or poly-chemotherapy, (3) Anti-angiogenic therapy, (4) Other targeted therapy. Main recommendations for older patients are: (1) Omission of chemotherapy should be discussed with a geriatrician for patients with severe comorbidities, advanced dementia, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or severe loss of autonomy. (2) If tumor response is not the main aim, a mono-chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil combined with bevacizumab is recommended as first-line. (3) For patients with symptoms related to metastases or with a planned metastasis ablation, a doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibody in the context of a RAS wild type tumor is recommended as first-line. Preliminary data suggest that regorafenib may be used, in its registered indication, in patients under 80 with a performance status of 0 and no autonomy alterations and that trifluridine-tipiracil may be used with a tight supervising of hematological function.     

Thymidylate synthase gene amplification in a colon tumor resistant to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy

We have identified amplification of the thymidylate synthase gene in a colonic tumor that had developed resistance to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination chemotherapy. The tumor had previously undergone a partial response to this combination but began to progress following a prolonged period of continuous therapy and relative disease stabilization. Since thymidylate synthase is a target enzyme for 5-fluorouracil, it is likely that the observed gene amplification is responsible for the resistance. Thus, gene amplification may be a relevant mechanism of acquired resistance to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the clinic.     

First-line chemotherapy with raltitrexed in metastatic colorectal cancer: an Association des Gastro-entérologues Oncologues (AGEO) multicentre study

BackgroundIn case of contraindication or intolerance to fluoropyrimidines, raltitrexed is a validated alternative in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), associated or not with oxaliplatin. Little is known about the outcomes of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan or targeted therapies.MethodsThis retrospective multicentre study enroled mCRC patients treated with first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy. Treatment-related toxicities were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from treatment start.Results75 patients were treated with raltitrexed alone, TOMOX, or TOMIRI with or without bevacizumab. Grade 3–4 adverse events were seen in 31% of patients, without significant difference between the different treatment schedules. amongst the 36 patients with a history of fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiac toxicity, none developed cardiovascular events on raltitrexed.Median PFS and OS were 10.6 (95% CI 8.2 – 13.1) and 27.4 months (95% CI 24.1–38.1), respectively. Considering the chemotherapy regimen, TOMOX was significantly associated with better PFS and OS compared to TOMIRI and raltitrexed alone.ConclusionsIn patients with mCRC not eligible for fluoropyrimidines, first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile. PFS and OS were consistent with usual survival data in mCRC, and significantly better in patients treated with TOMOX, independently of associated targeted therapies.     

MiR-31-3p do not predict anti-EGFR efficacy in first-line therapy of RAS wild-type metastatic right-sided colon cancer

BackgroundLow miR-31-3p expression was identified as predictive of anti-EGFR efficacy in RAS-wt mCRC. Primary tumor side was also proposed as a predictive factor of anti-EGFR benefit. This retrospective multicentric study evaluated the predictive role of miR-31-3p in right-sided RAS-wt mCRC patients treated with first-line CT+anti-EGFR or CT+bevacizumab (Beva).MethodsSeventy-two right-sided RAS-wt mCRC patients treated in first-line with CT+anti-EGFR (n = 43) or Beva (n = 29) were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) were analyzed and stratified according to tumor miR-31-3p expression level and targeted therapy (TT).ResultsBRAF V600E mutation was more frequent in high vs low miR-31-3p expressers (60.6% vs 15.4%, P < 0.001). PFS was significantly longer with CT+Beva than with CT+anti-EGFR (13 vs 7 months; P = 0.024). Among low miR-31-3p expressers, PFS, OS and RR were not significantly different between the two groups, while in high miR-31-3p expressers, only PFS was longer in the CT+Beva group (11 vs 6 months; P = 0.03). In patients treated with CT+anti-EGFR, low miR-31-3p expressers had a significantly longer OS (20 vs 13 months; P = 0.02) than high miR-31-3p expressers. ORR was not significantly different between the two groups of treatment, in both low and high miR-31-3p expressers. MiR-31-3p expression status was statistically correlated between primary tumors and corresponding metastases.ConclusionIn this study, miR-31-3p couldn't identify a subgroup of patients with right-sided RAS-wt mCRC who might benefit from anti-EGFR and suggest that Beva is the TT of choice in first-line treatment of these patients.     

Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial

AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with two chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized patients received cetuximab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 6 (arm A, n = 74) or 5-FU, FA and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (arm B, n = 77). KRAS mutation status was determined retrospectively in a subset of tumors (n = 117). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between treatment arms A and B ...     

Metronomic capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first line induction with XELOX for metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a priority strategy. However, which medicine is chosen is controversial. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with metronomic capecitabine vs observation.In this randomized controlled trial, patients who completed 18 weeks of induction chemotherapy with XELOX and achieved disease control were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to receive maintenance therapy with metronomic chemotherapy or observation until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from randomization; secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. Analyses were performed by intention to treat.Between January 1st, 2017 and December 31th 2018, 48 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive maintenance treatment with metronomic capecitabine (n = 25) or only observation (n = 23). The median progression-free survival in the metronomic capecitabine group was 5.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.25–6.07) months vs 3.98 (95%CI 3.71–4.24) months in the observation group (hazard ratio 0.11, 95% [CI] 0.04–0.26, P = .000). There was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival: 23.82 (95% CI 22.38–25.25) months in the metronomic capecitabine group vs 21.81 (95% CI 20.23–23.38) months in the observation group (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.21–1.11, P = .087). Subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the primary finding. Similar safety profiles were observed in both arms. The most frequent adverse events in metronomic capecitabine group included neutropenia, diarrhea, hand-foot skin reaction, and mucositis.Maintenance therapy with metronomic capecitabine can be considered an alternative option following first-line chemotherapy of XELOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with controlled toxicities.     

Avelumab versus standard second line treatment chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability: The SAMCO-PRODIGE 54 randomised phase II trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have failed in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients except those with dMMR/MSI tumors. However, until very recently we had only non-comparative promising data in this population with anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) antibodies alone or combined with anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) antibodies.This comparative phase II trial (NCT 03186326), conducted in more than 100 centers in France, will include dMMR/MSI mCRC patients with progression after a first-line treatment with chemotherapy ± targeted therapies, to evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-PDL1 Avelumab versus a standard second-line treatment. Main inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 75 years, ECOG performance status ≤2, dMMR/MSI mCRC and failure of a standard first-line regimen. Patient will be randomised to receive Avelumab 10 mg/kg versus standard second-line doublet chemotherapy plus a targeted agent according to tumor RAS status. Patients will be followed for 4 years. A gain of 5 months in median PFS is expected in favour of the Avelumab arm (12 vs 7 months; HR=0.58). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. In addition, circulating tumour DNA and microbiota will be explored to test their potential prognostic and predictive values. The study was opened in March 2018.     

Anti-angiogenic therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer:Current and future perspectives

Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States,with about 142820 new cases and 50830 deaths expected in 2013.Metastatic disease(mCRC)remains a challenge for oncologists worldwide due to its potential comorbidities.Recently,chemotherapy regimens containing 5-fluorouracil,leucovorin,oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations are a standard of care in the metastatic disease.Currently,biological therapies involving vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor pathways,such as bevacizumab and cetuximab,have emerged as good option for improving mCRC patient survival.Now,aflibercept plus standard chemotherapy has also been approved in second line regimen for mCRC patients.Our review will discuss novel biological drugs and their indications for mCRC patients and will bring future perspectives in this regard.     

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone in metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose  Bevacizumab has demonstrated survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients when combined with chemotherapy. Several randomized clinical studies have evaluated bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis was performed to better assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with chemotherapy for mCRC. Materials and methods  Five clinical trials randomizing a total of 3,103 mCRC patients to chemotherapy alone or to the combined treatment of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were identified. The efficacy data included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR), and the safety data contained the 60-day all-cause mortality rate, adverse events (AEs), and specific toxicity such as hypertension, thrombosis, bleeding, proteinuria, gastrointestinal perforation, diarrhea, and leucopenia. Result  There was a significant PFS benefit (P = 0.00; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.66) and OS benefit (P = 0.00; HR = 0.77) in favor of the combined treatment. The ORR was significantly higher on the bevacizumab-containing arm (P = 0.021; relative risk [RR] = 1.5), while CR was comparable between the two arms (P = 0.09). A higher incidence of grade 3/4 AEs, grade 3/4 hypertension, grade 3/4 thromboembolic/thrombotic events, grade 3/4 bleeding, and gastrointestinal perforation was associated with the bevacizumab group. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of grade 3/4 proteinuria, grade 3/4 leukopenia, grade 3/4 diarrhea, and the 60-day all-cause mortality rate. Conclusion  The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy confers a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in OS, PFS, and ORR. Its side effects are predictable and manageable and do not compound the incidence or severity of toxicities from chemotherapy.     

Prognostic value of treatment-related factors in metastatic colorectal cancer using a stop-and-go strategy

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify treatment-related factors prognostic of survival in a cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving a palliative, stop-and-go chemotherapy regimen.

Methods

Consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment with biweekly FLIRI plus bevacizumab were included. The outcome was overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of outcome. We analysed reduction in chemotherapy dosage (no vs. ≤25 or >25 % reduction), bevacizumab administrated to <50, or ≥50 % to chemotherapy treatments, best response during the first 24 weeks of treatment, and local treatment of metastases.

Results

We included 257 patients. Median survival was 23.6 months. Chemotherapy reduction did not influence outcome. Bevacizumab administrations (≥50 %) were associated with improved outcome: hazard ratios (HR) 0.56 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.90, p?=?0.018). Partial response (PR) vs. no change (NC) was borderline significant: HR 0.66 (95 % CI 0.43–0.99, p?=?0.048), whereas progressive disease (PD) vs. NC increased mortality HR 2.48 (95 % CI 1.19–5.19, p?=?0.016). Local treatment of metastases improved outcome: HR 0.30 (95 % CI 0.15–0.61, p?=?0.001).

Conclusions

In a cohort of mCRC patients, receiving a palliative, stop-and-go regimen, administration of bevacizumab to ≥50 % of chemotherapy treatments and local treatment of metastases were associated with better survival. PR improved outcome compared to NC, whereas PD was prognostic of increased mortality.     

Metabolic treatment with L-carnitine in acute anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Administration of L-carnitine in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prevents left ventricular remodeling. Current study was aimed to assess the effect of L-carnitine administration on mortality and heart failure in patients with anterior AMI. METHODS: CEDIM 2 trial was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial planned to enroll 4,000 patients with acute anterior AMI. The trial was interrupted after the enrolment of 2,330 patients because of the lower than expected enrolment rate. The primary end point was a composite of death and heart failure at 6 months; 5-day mortality was the secondary end point. RESULTS: During the 6-month follow-up, the primary end-point was not significantly different between the L-carnitine and placebo group (9.2 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.27). A reduction in mortality was seen in the L-carnitine arm on day 5 (secondary end-point) from randomization (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.98, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In CEDIM 2 trial L-carnitine therapy led to a reduction in early mortality (secondary end-point) without affecting the risk of death and heart failure at 6 months in patients with anterior AMI, leading to a non-significant finding with respect to the primary end-point.     

A rare hematological adverse event induced by bevacizumab: severe thrombocytopenia

BackgroundBevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor-A, is approved for the treatment of various malignancies, and its hematological toxicities are considered infrequent.MethodsA colorectal cancer patient receiving chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab developed acute, severe thrombocytopenia. We postulated that this thrombocytopenia could be directly triggered by bevacizumab.ResultsA man with stage IV colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis had received 10 cycles of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) without significant hematological toxicity. Due to thrombocytopenia, oxaliplatin was withdrawn after cycle 11. On cycle 12, shortly after bevacizumab infusion and before 5-fluorouracil infusion, the patient developed fever, lower limbs purpura, grade 1 proctorrhagia, and epistaxis. Platelets had decreased from 105,000/mm³ to 3000/mm³ within 1 hour after bevacizumab infusion. Flow cytometry identified platelet-associated immunoglobulins. Despite 2 apheresis-derived platelet transfusions, oral corticotherapy, and gamma globulin infusions, thrombocytopenia persisted, but was finally successfully treated with a peptibody thrombopoietin mimetic, which was introduced 28 days after the last bevacizumab infusion.ConclusionsClinicians should keep in mind that bevacizumab can induce acute and potentially severe immune-mediated thrombocytopenia.     

A clinical trial to evaluate the worth of preoperative multimodality therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the rectum

PURPOSE: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03 was designed to determine the worth of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of operable rectal cancer. METHODS: Thus far, 116 patients of an eventual 900 with primary operable rectal cancer have been randomized to receive multimodality therapy to begin preoperatively (59 patients) or identical therapy beginning after curative surgery (57). All patients received seven cycles of 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy. Cycles 1 and 4 through 7 used a high-dose weekly FU regimen. In Cycles 2 and 3, FU and low-dose LV chemotherapy was given during the first and fifth week of radiation therapy (5,040 cGy). The preoperative arm (Group 1) received the first three cycles of chemotherapy and all radiation therapy before surgery. The postoperative arm (Group 2) received all radiation and chemotherapy after surgery. Primary study end points included disease-free survival and survival. Secondary end points included local recurrence, primary tumor response to combination therapy, tumor downstaging, and sphincter preservation. RESULTS: Overall treatment-related toxicity was similar in both groups. Although seven preoperative patients had events after randomization that precluded surgery, eight events occurred during an equivalent follow-up period in the postoperative group. No patient was deemed inoperable because of progressive local disease. Sphincter-saving surgery was intended in 31 percent of Group 1 patients and 33 percent of Group 2 patients at the time of randomization. Such surgery was actually performed in 50 percent of the preoperatively treated patients and 33 percent of the postoperatively treated patients. The use of protective colostomy in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery and the development of perioperative complications in all surgical patients were similar in both groups. There was evidence of tumor downstaging in evaluable patients under-going preoperative therapy, with 8 percent of Group 1 patients having had a pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: These data do suggest that the preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimen used are, at least, as safe and tolerable as standard postoperative treatment. There is presently a trend to tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation in the preoperative arm. Whether this arm will have greater or lesser survival and long-term toxicity awaits the completion of this relevant study.Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants U10-CA-12027 and U10-CA-37377 and American Cancer Society Grant R-13.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Maintenance therapy with alternate-day prednisone improves survival in multiple myeloma patients

The role of maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma is controversial. Recent studies have shown an improvement in both progression-free and overall survival for patients receiving maintenance treatment with a combination of interferon and glucocorticoids, compared with interferon alone. The role of glucocorticoids alone as maintenance therapy has not been previously addressed. We compared alternate-day, oral prednisone at 2 different dose levels (10 mg versus 50 mg) for remission maintenance among previously untreated myeloma patients following a response to induction with standard-dose vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone with prednisone (VAD-P) or VAD-P plus quinine (VAD-P/Q). There were 250 eligible patients registered on Southwest Oncology Group study 9210 and randomized to receive VAD-P or VAD-P/Q. There were 125 patients achieving at least a 25% tumor reduction following induction therapy who were randomized to either physiologic (10 mg) or pharmacologic (50 mg) doses of alternate-day, oral prednisone until disease progression. At the time of study entry, patient characteristics were similar in VAD-P and VAD-P/Q patients and in the 2 arms randomized to maintenance therapy. After a median follow-up of 53 months, there was no difference in either progression-free or overall survival between the 2 induction regimens. However, from the time of maintenance randomization, both progression-free (14 versus 5 months; P =.003) and overall survival (37 versus 26 months; P =.05) were significantly improved in patients receiving 50 mg as compared with 10 mg alternate-day prednisone. There was no difference in treatment-related adverse events between the groups. Thus, 50 mg, oral, alternate-day prednisone is effective maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma patients who achieve a response to induction chemotherapy. (Blood. 2002;99:3163-3168)     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy for patients with advanced lung cancer and heavily treated with EGFR mutation: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundEGFR-mutated lung cancer poorly responded to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy. Whether patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer can benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with other drugs remains controversial. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor combined with other drugs (chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab) in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, who have progressed on EGFR–TKI treatment to determine the activity of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy or/and bevacizumab therapy in heavily treated patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer.MethodsWe identified 56 patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy. The objective response rates were assessed using RECIST v1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Academic Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. (NO. 2019 160), and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.ResultsObjective responses were observed in 6 of 56 (10.7%) patients, and the disease control rate was 53.6% (30/56). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.33 months with 95% CI of 1.58–5.08 months. No patient achieved a complete response. All six patients that achieved PR were treated with the PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy or bevacizumab therapy. Three of the six patients who achieved PR were treated with radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy. Patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as second-line therapy showed relatively longer PFS and higher objective response rates than those treated with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as third- or late-line therapy (PFS: 5.50 vs. 3.27 months, P=0.301; objective response rates: 25.0% vs. 6.82%, P=0.071). No additional AE profile was observed.ConclusionsThe PD-1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy showed acceptable toxicity profile and moderate efficacy on heavily treated advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer after the exhaustion of target therapy.     

Value of maintenance therapy with chemotherapy or interferon during remission of acute myeloid leukaemia

108 consecutive patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia at ages 15 to 59 years were treated in a prospective controlled multicentre trial. Induction with combination TAD resulted in a complete remission in 85 cases (79%). After a cyclic consolidation programme for 6 months, 73% of the remissions continued. The maintenance therapy was at random either nothing, or alpha interferon, or monthly 5 day courses with thioguanine and cytarabine. The median duration of all remissions was 13 months; that of those in the control and interferon arms 15 months each, and in the chemotherapy arm 18 months. The median survival of all the 108 patients was 16 months; that of those in the control arm 20 months, in the interferon arm 33 months and in the chemotherapy arm 26 months. At 5 yr, 31%, 22% and 31%, respectively, were alive. The survival curves did not differ from each other significantly. Maintenance treatment after an intensive induction and a moderately intensive consolidation was of no benefit in this study. Interferon did not improve the prognosis.     

Carcinoembryonic antigen kinetics predict response to first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis from PRODIGE 9 trial

BackgroundTo examine the relationship between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) kinetics and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy in the PRODIGE9 trial.MethodsAssociations between monthly CEA measurements within 6 months since baseline and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using a joint-latent class-mixed model. A validation set was used to test our prognosis model. Correlations between CEA trajectories (classes) and baseline characteristics were also investigated.ResultsThree classes were identified. Class 1 had low baseline CEA with small variations. Class 2 had high baseline CEA with a rapid decrease reaching the same CEA level at 6 months as in class 1. Class 3 had high baseline CEA with a transient decrease followed by an increase to reach, at 6 months, the same CEA level as at baseline. Six-month PFS was significantly lower in class 3 than in classes 1 and 2 (57% vs. 91% and 93% respectively; p<0.01). Class 3 was significantly associated with ECOG 2 status, a high LDH level and non-resected primary tumor.DiscussionVariations in CEA kinetics correlate with prognosis in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for mCRC. We propose here a user-friendly application to classify CEA trajectory.     

Randomized trial comparing weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus monthly 5-day 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of weekly intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil plus low-dose leucovorin with the Mayo Clinics' monthly 5-day schedule of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: A total of 96 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive either a weekly i.v. bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 (weekly arm), or i.v. bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days every 4 or 5 weeks (monthly arm). Therapy was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity appeared. In the presence of disease progression, the study regimen was stopped and second-line treatment was instituted after the patient was discontinued from this study. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of response rates between both regimens. The response rate were 14.3% in the weekly arm (2 CR and 5 PR, 95% CI: 2.6-25.2%) and 10.6% in the monthly arm (1 CR and 4 PR; 95% CI: 6.5-32.3%), respectively (P = 0.8957). The survival times were also similar between the two (P = 0.4207, log-rank test). The median survival were 15.8 months in the monthly arm and 18.4 months in the weekly arm. Hematologic toxicity was minimal in both arms. However, the monthly arm produced a higher toxicity in severe (grade 3-4) diarrhea (14.9% vs. 2%; P = 0.029) and stomatitis (8.5% vs. 0; P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin achieved a similar response rate and survival as compared with the Mayo Clinics' monthly 5-day schedule, but severe toxicity was less commonly seen using the weekly regimen. As current chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer is largely palliative rather than curative, the weekly bolus regimen may be a more favorable approach in managing metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma with liver metastasis of rectal cancer

Primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma is a particularly rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Curative resection is currently the only effective treatment, and the efficacy of chemotherapy is unclear. This represents the first case report of a patient with primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma co-existing with metastatic liver carcinoma. We present a 59-year-old man who was diagnosed preoperatively with rectal cancer with multiple liver metastases. He underwent a curative hepatectomy after a series of chemotherapy regimens with modified FOLFOX6 consisting of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab, FOLFIRI consisting of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan plus bevacizumab, and irinotecan plus cetuximab. One of the liver tumors showed a different response to chemotherapy and was diagnosed as a leiomyosarcoma following histopathological examination. This case suggests that irinotecan has the potential to inhibit the growth of hepatic leiomyosarcomas. The possibility of comorbid different histological types of tumors should be suspected when considering the treatment of multiple liver tumors.