Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate positive surgical margin (PSM) rates in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and assess PSM impact on cancer-specific mortality (CSM).

Positive Surgical Margins Predict Progression-free Survival After Nephron-sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Single Center Cohort of 459 Cases With a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years

Background

The role of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on the recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is debated, and available evidence lacks long-term data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of PSMs on progression-free survival (PFS) in a large cohort followed for at least 5 years.

Predictors of Cancer-specific Survival After Disease Recurrence in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Effect of Time to Recurrence

Introduction

A few studies addressed predictive factors of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following surgery. Time to recurrence (TTR) is an important predictor of CSM in various types of cancers. The aim of our study was to describe the course of RCC following disease recurrence and to identify prognostic factors that influence CSM with a special focus on TTR.

Differing Risk of Cancer Death Among Patients With Pathologic T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Identification of Risk Categories According to Fat Infiltration and Renal Vein Thrombosis

ObjectivesThe study objectives were to evaluate the prognostic impact of fat infiltration and renal vein thrombosis in patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify new prognostic groups.Material and MethodsWe analyzed 122 consecutive patients with pT3a who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC between 2000 and 2011 at the University of Bologna. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves; univariable and multivariable analyses were performed with Cox analysis.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 41.7 ± 35.4 months. Patients with peritumoral/hilar fat infiltration (n = 63) and patients with renal vein thrombosis (n = 18) experienced comparable CSS rates, whereas patients with both fat infiltration plus renal vein thrombosis (n = 41) showed worse survival outcomes than the first group (P = .026). Patients were divided in 2 groups: group A, with fat invasion or renal vein thrombosis, and group B, with concomitant fat invasion and renal vein invasion. Group B showed worse cancer-specific survival than group A (P = .024). At multivariate analysis, this new risk-group stratification was found to be an independent prognostic predictor of CSS (P < .05).ConclusionsPatients with T3a RCC with both fat invasion and renal vein thrombosis experience worse survival rates when compared with those patients with only 1 prognostic factor. The TNM classification should consider the concomitant presence of those parameters as a different prognostic predictor.     

Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 Study

BackgroundThe open-label, phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 study (NCT02596035) was conducted to validate the safety and efficacy of flat-dose nivolumab monotherapy 240 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) in previously treated advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Three cohorts included patients with predominantly clear cell histology, non-clear cell histologies, or brain metastases. We report safety and efficacy from the CheckMate 374 advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC) cohort.Patients and MethodsEligible patients received prior treatment regimens (1-2 antiangiogenic; 0-3 systemic) with progression on/after last treatment and ≤ 6 months of enrollment. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg Q2W for ≤ 24 months or until confirmed progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of high-grade (grade 3-5) immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs). Exploratory endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.ResultsNinety-seven patients had advanced predominantly ccRCC; 75.3% received only 1 prior systemic regimen in the advanced/metastatic setting. After a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 0.4-26.9 months), no grade 5 IMAEs occurred, and 9.3% of patients reported grade 3/4 IMAEs (hepatitis, 4.1%; diabetes mellitus, 2.1%; nephritis and renal dysfunction, 1.0%; rash, 1.0%; adrenal insufficiency, 1.0%). The objective response rate was 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.8%-32.3%). Three patients had a complete response; 19 had partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.5 months). The median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI, 17.4 months to not estimable).ConclusionsThis study validates the safety and efficacy of nivolumab 240 mg Q2W flat-dose monotherapy for previously treated advanced ccRCC and adds to previous safety and efficacy data using the 3 mg/kg Q2W dose.     

Prognostic Significance of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Sunitinib: A European Multiinstitutional Study

Introduction/BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of CN in patients with mRCC and synchronous metastases treated with the VEGF receptor TKI, sunitinib.Patients and MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of metastases before, at the time of, or within 3 months from the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and first-line treatment with sunitinib were included. Baseline characteristics were correlated with overall survival (OS) according to hazard ratios estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models. Significant factors were then included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsOne hundred eighty-six patients treated between January 2006 and March 2012 were selected. Thirty-six (19%) had not undergone CN. CN was offered to younger patients with better prognoses. Patients who underwent CN lived significantly longer than patients without CN (median OS, 23.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.8-28.8] vs. 9 [95% CI, 4-16.4] months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that CN had an independent prognostic significance. No specific subgroup benefiting from CN was identified.ConclusionCN was an independent favorable prognostic factor in patients with synchronous metastases from RCC, treated with sunitinib. Information regarding the selection of mRCC patients likely to benefit from CN might be derived by ongoing phase III trials.     

Standard vs Adapted Sunitinib Regimen in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Results From a Large Retrospective Analysis

BackgroundThere are no data on the patterns of care and outcome of elderly patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib. In a retrospective study, we assessed the routine use of first-line sunitinib in mRCC patients aged ≥ 70 years.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed the clinical files of 185 patients aged ≥ 70 years with mRCC treated with first-line sunitinib in 17 Italian oncology units from February 2006 to September 2011. One hundred twenty-three patients (66.5%) received a standard 50 mg/d for a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off regimen (SR), and 62 patients (33.5%) received an AR consisting of 37.5 mg/d for a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off in 67.7% of cases.ResultsMedian age was 74 years. Patients treated with an AR were older than those treated with the SR (P < .0001). In the overall population, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.5 months. Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 87 of 123 SR (70.7%) and 32 of 62 AR (51.6%), respectively; dose reductions were required in 82 SR (66.7%) and 26 AR (41.9%), respectively; discontinuations because of therapy-related adverse events occurred in 25 SR (20.3%) and 15 AR (24.2%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, only performance status and the Heng score were predictors of either PFS or OS.ConclusionSunitinib is active and feasible in elderly patients with mRCC. A sunitinib AR could be considered as an option in selected older mRCC patients. The optimal treatment of frail patients with mRCC remains to be established.     

Cabozantinib in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Brain Metastases: Safety and Efficacy in a Real-World Population

BackgroundCabozantinib showed efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study we aimed to describe the safety and to collect evidence on the potential efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients with brain metastases (BM) in a real-world experience.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively collected data of patients treated with cabozantinib within the Italian Managed Access Program. Patients were selected for the presence of BM before the start of treatment and for at least 1 previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment regimen for metastatic disease. Safety data were reported, and overall response rate (ORR), brain-specific response, progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed.ResultsOverall, 12 patients treated with cabozantinib were evaluated. Any grade adverse events (AEs) accounted for 92%, Grade 3/4 AEs rated at 36% with no major neurological side effects. The most common AEs included hypertension (33%), fatigue (24%), aminotransferase elevation (25%), hypothyroidism (16%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (16%). The ORR was 50% with a disease control rate of 75%. All 5 patients treated with a combined systemic and brain-directed approach obtained intracranial disease control, without increased toxicity. Median PFS and median OS were 5.8 and 8.8 months, respectively. Comparable safety and tolerability results for other TKI regimens were reported from the literature.ConclusionCabozantinib showed safety, acceptable tolerability, and promising antitumor activity in a population of mRCC patients with BM from a real-world experience. A combined modality approach for renal cell carcinoma with BM, whenever feasible, could be recommended to improve oncological outcomes.     

Renal Effects of Crizotinib in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced NSCLC

IntroductionWe retrospectively analyzed the effects of crizotinib on serum creatinine and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive advanced NSCLC across four trials (NCT00585195, NCT00932451, NCT00932893, and NCT01154140).MethodsChanges from baseline data in serum creatinine and eGFR, calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine-based equation, were assessed over time. eGFR was graded using standard chronic kidney disease criteria.ResultsMedian serum creatinine increased from 0.79 mg/dL at baseline to 0.93 mg/dL after 2 weeks of treatment (median percentage increase from baseline, 21.2%), was stable from week 12 (0.96 mg/dL) to week 104 (1.00 mg/dL), and decreased to 0.90 mg/dL at 28 days after last dose (median percentage increase from baseline, 13.1%). Median eGFR decreased over time (96.42, 80.23, 78.06 and 75.45 mL/min/1.73 m² at baseline, week 2, week 12, and week 104, respectively) and increased to 83.02 mL/min/1.73 m² at 28 days after the last dose. Median percentage decrease from baseline was 14.9%, 17.0%, and 10.4% at week 2, week 12, and 28 days after last dose of crizotinib, respectively. Overall, 12.6% of patients had a shift from eGFR grade less than or equal to 3a (≥45 mL/min/1.73 m²) at baseline to greater than or equal to 3b (<45 mL/min/1.73 m²) post-baseline.ConclusionsCrizotinib resulted in a decline in creatinine-based estimates of renal function mostly over the first 2 weeks of treatment. However, there was minimal evidence of cumulative effects with prolonged treatment and these changes were largely reversible following treatment discontinuation, consistent with previous reports suggesting this may be predominantly an effect on creatinine secretion as opposed to true nephrotoxicity.     

Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in pT3a Pathologically Upstaged Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis

BackgroundThe efficacy of partial nephrectomy (PN) in setting of pT3a pathologic-upstaged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. We compared oncologic and functional outcomes of radical nephrectomy (RN) and PN in patients with upstaged pT3a RCC.Patients and MethodsThis was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with cT1-2N0M0 RCC upstaged to pT3a postoperatively. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, with secondary outcomes of overall survival and de novo estimated glomular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for oncologic outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) were obtained to elucidate survival outcomes.ResultsA total of 929 patients had pT3a upstaging (686 [72.6%] RN; 243 [25.7%] PN; mean follow-up, 48 months). Tumor size was similar (RN 7.7 cm vs. PN 7.3 cm; P = .083). PN had decreased ΔeGFR (6.1 vs. RN 19.4 mL/min/1.73m²; P < .001) and de novo eGFR < 60 (9.5% vs. 21%; P = .008). Multivariable analysis for recurrence showed increasing RENAL score (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; P < .001), clinical T stage (HR, 1.8; P < .001), positive margin (HR, 1.57; P = .009), and high grade (HR, 1.21; P = .01) to be independent predictors, whereas surgery was not (P = .076). KMA revealed 5-year recurrence-free survival for cT1-upstaged PN, cT1-upstaged RN, cT2-upstaged PN, and cT2-upstaged RN of 79%, 74%, 70%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001). KMA revealed 5-year overall survival for cT1-upstaged PN, cT1-upstaged RN, cT2-upstaged PN, and cT2-upstaged RN of 64%, 65.2%, 56.4%, and 55.2%, respectively (P = .059).ConclusionsIn pathologically upstaged pT3a RCC, PN did not adversely affect risk of recurrence and provided functional benefit. Surgical decision-making in patients at risk for T3a upstaging should be individualized and driven by tumor as well as functional risks.     

Small Renal Masses Initially Managed Using Active Surveillance: Results From a Retrospective Study With Long-Term Follow-Up

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to provide outcomes of patients managed using active surveillance (AS) for small renal masses (SRMs).Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data of 62 patients diagnosed with 64 contrast enhancing SRMs suspicious for renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated the differences between patients who remained on AS and those who underwent delayed surgical intervention.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 75 years and the mean follow-up was 91.5 months. The median tumor size and the median estimated tumor volume were 2.6 cm and 8.7 cm³, respectively. The median linear growth rate and the median volumetric growth rate were 0.7 cm/y and 8.8 cm³/y, respectively. The mean linear and volumetric growth rates of the group of patients who underwent surgery was higher than in those who remained on surveillance (1.9 vs. 0.4 cm/y and 16.1 vs. 4.6 cm³/y, respectively; P < .001).ConclusionMost SRMs show an indolent course, with low metastatic potential. Faster linear and volumetric growth rates could be the expression of malignant disease, thus suggesting the need for a delayed surgical intervention. AS is a reasonable option for the management of SRMs in properly selected patients with low life expectancy.     

Hypertension and Circulating Cytokines and Angiogenic Factors in Patients With Advanced Non‐Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Sunitinib: Results From a Phase II Trial

Background.

We evaluated the significance of hypertension developing during vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) treatment and a group of cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) in advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) patients treated with sunitinib in a phase II study.

Materials and Methods.

Using multiplex assays, we analyzed the levels of 38 CAFs in plasma at baseline and after 4 weeks of sunitinib therapy. Sunitinib benefit was defined as a partial response or stable disease using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors lasting ≥4 months. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations among hypertension, CAFs, and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results.

Fifty-seven patients were evaluable; 53 had baseline CAF levels available. The median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–5.5) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 10.7–27.4), respectively. Sunitinib benefit was observed in 21 patients (37%). However, 33 patients (60%) developed hypertension during treatment, although no association was found with survival or response. Elevated baseline soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor I, interleukin-8, growth-regulated oncogene, transforming growth factor-α, and VEGFR-2 levels were associated with an increased risk of death on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion.

We found no association between the development of hypertension and survival or sunitinib benefit in advanced nccRCC. TNF and angiogenic/immunomodulatory mediators were identified for evaluation as markers of prognosis and VEGFR-TKI benefit in future studies.

Implications for Practice:

The present study describes the first analysis of hypertension and a relatively large set of circulating cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) treated with sunitinib. No association was found between hypertension and patient outcomes. However, a group of candidate circulating biomarkers was identified, in particular, those associated with tumor necrosis factor and CXCR1/2 signaling, with probable biological and clinical significance in nccRCC, warranting confirmation in future studies.     

Female Gender Predicts Favorable Prognosis in Patients With Non-metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Curative Surgery: Results From the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC)

BackgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding gender differences in the prognosis of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In the present study, we investigated the prognostic value of gender in patients with non-metastatic ccRCC undergoing curative surgery using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to balance the difference in baseline factors between females and males.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC) dataset and included 2055 patients with cT1-4N0M0 ccRCC who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy. The IPTW method was used to adjust for baseline characteristics between females and males (age, race, surgery type, and pT stage), and the association of gender with recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated.ResultsDuring the follow-up (median, 30 months), 162 (8%) patients had disease recurrence (5-year RFS rate, 88%). Female gender (n = 712; 35%) was significantly associated with a lower Fuhrman grade (unweighted, P = .022; IPTW-weighted, P < .001). Females had significantly better RFS compared with males (unweighted, 5-year RFS rate, 92% vs. 87%; P = .005; IPTW-weighted, 5-year RFS rate, 92% vs. 86%; P = .002). IPTW-weighted multivariate analysis showed that female gender was an independent predictor for better RFS (hazard ratio, 0.59; P = .005) along with lower pT stage and lower Fuhrman grade. The prognostic significance of female gender was also observed in the unweighted multivariate analysis.ConclusionFemale gender was significantly associated with a lower Fuhrman grade and better prognosis for patients with non-metastatic ccRCC undergoing curative surgery.     

Assessing Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for First-Line Therapy in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-Life Data From a Single United Kingdom Institution

BackgroundElderly metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients are under-represented in clinical trials, whose results are therefore difficult to translate into routine management of older patients. We aimed at exploring treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in our real-life elderly mRCC cohort receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment data of elderly (≥ 70 years old at first-line start) mRCC patients starting either pazopanib or sunitinib as first-line treatment in our institution between March 2012 and April 2018. Baseline characteristics included age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).ResultsIn total, the records of 35 elderly mRCC patients were identified and retrospectively analyzed. Overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 20%, 9.7 months, and 21.6 months, respectively. Karnofsky performance status ≤ 70%, sarcomatoid features, absolute neutrophil count greater than upper limit of normal, and treatment-related Grade 3 arterial hypertension were independently associated with survival after multivariate analysis. Age-adjusted CCI was significantly associated with survival in univariate analysis only. The overall incidence of Grade 3 to 5 toxicities was 74%. Seven patients (20%) received early crossover to either sunitinib or pazopanib because of toxicity. Dose reduction was applied in 24 (73%) of the 33 patients who completed at least 1 cycle.ConclusionFirst-line TKI monotherapy provided clinical benefit in our elderly mRCC cohort. Relatively frequent dose reductions helped to maintain an acceptable tolerability profile. Further research is warranted to explore the significance of prognostic factors in elderly mRCC patients.     

External Validation of a Novel Risk Model in Patients With Favorable Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Defined by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC): Results From the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) Database

BackgroundA novel prognostic model was recommended for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) by the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC). In this study, we aimed to externally validate a novel risk model for the IMDC-favorable risk group in patients with mRCC.MethodsThe Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) is a multicenter registry that includes 13 cancer centers in Turkey. As described by Schmidt et al., 3 parameters (ie, time from diagnosis to systemic therapy <3 vs. ≥3 years, Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] 80 vs. >80, and the presence of brain, liver, or bone metastasis) were used to divide the IMDC favorable risk group into 2 new categories: very favorable and favorable risk groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Time to treatment failure (TTF) and objective response rate (ORR) in the very favorable and favorable risk groups were the secondary endpoints.ResultsA total of 545 patients with mRCC from all IMDC risk groups and 112 patients from the favorable risk group were included in this study. According to the novel classification model, 44 (39.3%) and 68 (60.7%) patients with former favorable risk were categorized into very favorable and favorable risk groups, respectively. The median OS (55.8 months vs. 34.2 months, P = .025) and TTF (25.5 months vs. 15.5 months, P = .010) were longer in the very favorable risk group than in the favorable risk group. The concordance index of the new IMDC model in all patients was 0.65 for OS. Despite the higher ORR in the very favorable risk group than in the favorable risk group, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (52.4% vs. 44.7, P = .573).ConclusionsThis was the first study to externally validate the novel IMDC risk model presented in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium 2021.     

Characterization of PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Large Multicenter Study

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) play a decisive role as prognostic markers in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, the role of PD-1/PD-L1 as a prognostic marker in papillary RCC (pRCC) remains scarce.Patients and MethodsPatients’ sample collection was a joint collaboration of the nationwide PANZAR consortium – a multicenter study. Medical history and tumor specimens were collected from 245 and 129 patients with pRCC types 1 and 2, respectively. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was determined by immunohistochemistry in pRCC and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells.ResultsOf 374 pRCC specimens, 204 type 1 and 97 type 2 were evaluable for PD-1 and PD-L1 expression analysis. In total, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were found in 8 (4.9%) of 162 and 12 (7.2%) of 166 evaluable pRCC type 1 specimens. Comparably, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were found in 2 (2.4%) of 83 and 5 (6.2%) of 81 evaluable pRCC type 2 specimens. Hardly any clinically relevant associations between PD-1 and PD-L1 positivity and clinicopathologic or clinical courses were observed, neither in pRCC type 1 nor type 2.ConclusionThe analysis of a large pRCC cohort from a multicenter consortium revealed no impact of PD-1/PD-L1 expression on prognosis in patients with pRCC with predominantly limited disease status, neither for type 1 nor type 2. However, the impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 in more advanced pRCC disease needs further elucidation.     

Impact of the off-clamp endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) of clinical T1 renal tumors on the postoperative renal function: Results from a matched-pair comparison

Purpose

To evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes of a matched-paired series of on-clamp vs off-clamp endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) and standardized renorraphy in a tertiary referral institution, to search for predictors of functional drop after surgery and to investigate the influence of off-clamp technique in patients presenting these characteristics.

Survival Benefit of Palliative Local Treatments and Efficacy of Different Pharmacotherapies in Colorectal Cancer With Lung Metastasis: Results From a Large Retrospective Study

Background

For most colorectal cancer patients with initial lung metastasis (LM), the only suitable treatments are palliative, including palliative local therapy and pharmacotherapy. We investigated the role of palliative local treatments in prolonging survival and the efficacy of different pharmacotherapies.

Final Effectiveness and Safety Results of NABUCCO: Real-World Data From a Noninterventional,Prospective, Multicenter Study in 697 Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With nab-Paclitaxel

Background

One of the most effective chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is nab-paclitaxel (nab-P), which is approved for treatment of MBC after failure of first-line therapy and when anthracyclines are not indicated. Randomized clinical trials have shown high efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Real-world data of nab-P in MBC, however, are still limited.